DOCSLIB.ORG

March 10, 2016 Mr. Todd Noethen Vice President, Distribution Support

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

March 10, 2016 Mr. Todd Noethen Vice President, Distribution Support Services AVDC, Inc. 300 Phillipi Road Columbus, Ohio 43228 RE: Archaeological and Paleontologic Assessment Jupiter Project – Navajo Road Apple Valley, San Bernardino, California Project # 2070.01 Dear Mr. Noethen: Northgate Environmental Management, Inc. (Northgate) is submitting the attached Final Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Phase I Assessment, for the Jupiter Project property located on Navajo Road in the City of Apple Valley, San Bernardino County, California. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call at (949) 716-0050 ext. 101. Sincerely, Northgate Environmental Management, Inc. Derrick Willis Principal Attachment: Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Phase I Assessment, cc: Roland M. Longo, Haskell Architects & Engineers PA Michael H. Wheeler, Haskell Architects & Engineers PA 428 13th Street, 4th Floor 24411 Ridge Route Drive, Suite 130 20251 Century Boulevard, Suite 315 Oakland, California 94612 Laguna Hills, California 92653 Germantown, Maryland 20874 tel 510.839.0688 tel 949.716.0050 tel 301.528.1500 www.ngem.com ATTACHMENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES PHASE I ASSESSMENT Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Phase I Assessment Jupiter Project – Navajo Road, Town of Apple Valley, San Bernardino County, California Prepared for: Northgate Environmental Management, Inc. 24411 Ridge Route Drive, Suite 130 Laguna Hills, California 92653 Prepared by: Denise Ruzicka, M.A., M.S., RPA Edited by: Robin Turner, M.A. Michael X. Kirby, Ph.D. ArchaeoPaleo Resource Management Inc. 1531 Pontius Ave, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90025 424.248.3316 USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle: Apple Valley North (1970 revised 1993) Area: 106.4 acres March 2016 This document contains sensitive information regarding the location of archaeological sites which should not be disclosed to the general public or other unauthorized persons. Archaeological and other heritage resources can be damaged or destroyed through uncontrolled public disclosure of information regarding their location. Therefore, information regarding the location, character, or ownership of archaeological or other heritage resources is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act pursuant to 16 USC 470w-3 (National Historic Preservation Act) and 16 USC Section 470(h) (Archaeological Resources Protections Act). This report and records that relate to archaeological sites information maintained by the Department of Parks and Recreation, the State Historical Resources Commission, or the State Lands Commission are exempt from the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250 et seq., see Government Code Section 6254.19). In addition, Government Code Section 6254 explicitly authorizes public agencies to withhold information from the public relating to Native American graves, cemeteries, and sacred places maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. ii ArchaeoPaleo Resource Management, Inc. Jupiter Project – Navajo Road March 2016 Cultural Phase I Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ArchaeoPaleo Resource Management, Inc. (APRMI) was contracted to perform an Archaeological and Paleontological Phase I Assessment of the Jupiter Project – Navajo Road in the Town of Apple Valley. This Project is located on 106.4 acres of undeveloped land southwest of the intersection of Navajo Road and Lafayette Road. The Project involves excavation and grading for a 1.36 million square-foot one-story Big Lots distribution warehouse and associated at-grade parking. One historic refuse site (CA-SBr-6842H) and one historic isolate (P36-012856) that were previously recorded within the Project boundaries were relocated during the field reconnaissance for this Project. The site consists of an amethyst and aqua glass scatter as well as metal brackets/straps, a rusted bolt, tin cans, and non-diagnostic white earthenware sherds. It appears to date to the early-20th century, specifically the 1920s. The previously recorded historic isolate is a KC baking powder can with a date range of 1925 to 1950. One additional historic site and five additional historic resources were encountered during the field reconnaissance. The newly recorded site consists of three artifacts within a 15-foot radius: a vent-hole can, the top of a colorless glass milk bottle, and the base of a colorless glass probable beverage bottle. The site probably dates to the mid-20th century. The newly recorded historic isolates include three vent-hole cans and two church-key-opened flat top beverage cans. Three previously recorded resources were not relocated and include a Pennzoil bucket, a hole-in-top can, and a prehistoric white chert flake. In addition to the resources on site, six resources are located within a mile of the Project. They consist of a prehistoric artifact scatter, an isolated prehistoric black chert flake, another historic refuse site, two historic wood-lined shallow depressions, and a historic U-shaped rock enclosure that probably served as a fire pit. No paleontological resources have been previously recorded on the Project site. However, six fossil localities are present in the Project region in similar sediment as is present on the surface of the Project (older Quaternary alluvium). These fossil localities yielded vertebrate specimens of horse, bison, camel, hare, and meadow vole. The Native American Heritage Commission’s search of the Sacred Lands Inventory did not locate any recorded Native American traditional sites or places, but such searches do not preclude the possibility of subsurface sites or unrecorded Native American sites. In addition, a response was received from one of the names on the Native American Contacts List, which expressed concern regarding the Project area. Due to the quantity of artifacts observed in the Project area during the field reconnaissance, there is a high potential to uncover archaeological resources in Project-related excavations at least up to five feet below the surface. Therefore, full-time archaeological monitoring of any construction-related earth-moving activities for the Project is required until the archaeologist determines that there is no further potential for archaeological materials to be observed or collected. In addition, if any prehistoric artifacts or sites are observed during Project-related ground disturbances, it is recommended that a Native American monitor be retained from that point on for any excavations on the Project. Due to the potential to uncover paleontological resources below the surface, full-time paleontological monitoring of all construction- related earth-moving activities below three feet is required unless the paleontologist determines that there is no potential for fossil remains within the Project area, based on observations of subsurface sediment and stratigraphy. iii ArchaeoPaleo Resource Management, Inc. Jupiter Project – Navajo Road March 2016 Cultural Phase I Assessment ACRONYMS amsl above mean sea level APN Assessor’s Parcel Number APRMI ArchaeoPaleo Resource Management, Inc. AT&SF Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway AVIM Antelope Valley Indian Museum BNSF Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway CCR California Code of Regulations CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CHL California Historical Landmarks CHRIS California Historical Resources Information System CPHI California Points of Historical Interest CRHR California Register of Historical Resources CRM Cultural Resource Management CSRR California Southern Railroad DPR (California) Department of Parks and Recreation EIR Environmental Impact Report GIS Geographic Information Systems HRI (California State) Historic Resources Inventory HSC Health and Safety Code LACM Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County MBA Michael Brandman Associates MLD Most Likely Descendent MMRP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program mya million years ago NAGPRA Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NRHP National Register of Historic Places OHP Office of Historic Preservation PRC Public Resources Code RPA Registered Professional Archaeologist SCA Society for California Archaeology SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center SPRR Southern Pacific Railroad SRS Scientific Resource Surveys SVP Society for Vertebrate Paleontology TCP Traditional Cultural Property UCMP University of California Museum of Paleontology USC United States Code USGS United States Geological Survey iv ArchaeoPaleo Resource Management, Inc. Jupiter Project – Navajo Road March 2016 Cultural Phase I Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... iii ACRONYMS ...............................................................................................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ...................................................................................................................... 1 NATURAL SETTING .................................................................................................................................................... 3 PROJECT PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Chino Basin Water Bank Strategic Plan

    Chino Basin Water Bank Strategic Plan

    attExperience statements for each of the ARCADIS team members can be found in the ARCADIS Chinoproposal (AttachmentBasin C). Water Bank Strategic Plan WaterSMART Grants: Water Marketing Strategy Grants Funding Opportunity BOR-DO-1ϴ-F01Ϭ Inland Empire Utilities AgencyAgency JasonJason Gu, Grants OfficerOfficer 66075075 Kimball Avenue |Chino|Chino |CA|CA 91708 [email protected]@ieua.org Table of Contents Technical Proposal and Evaluation Criteria .................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 Background Data ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Project Description.................................................................................................................................... 4 Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................................................................... 11 Evaluation Criterion A – Water Marketing Benefits ........................................................................... 11 Evaluation Criterion B – Level of Stakeholder Support and Involvement ..........................................13
  • An Overview of the Cultural Resources of the Western Mojave Desert

    An Overview of the Cultural Resources of the Western Mojave Desert

    BLM LIBRARY BURE/ IT 88014080 An Overview of the Cultural Resources of the Western Mojave Desert by E . G ary Stic kel and - L ois J . W einm an Ro berts with sections by Rainer Beig ei and Pare Hopa cultural resources publications anthropology— history Cover design represents a petroglyph element from Inscription Canyon, San Bernardino County, California. : AN OVERVIEW OF THE CULTURAL RESOURCES OF THE WESTERN TOJAVE DESERT by Gary Stickel and Lois J. Weinman- Roberts Environmental Research Archaeologists: A Scientific Consortium Los Angeles with sections by Rainer Berger and Pare Hopa BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LIBRARY Denver, Colorado 88014680 Prepared for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert Planning Program 3610 Central Avenue, Suite 402 Riverside, California 92506 Contract No. YA-512-CT8-106 ERIC W. RITTER GENERAL EDITOR Bureau of Land RIVERSIDE, CA Management Library 1980 Bldg. 50, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 *•' FOREWORD Culture resource overviews such as this bring together much of the available information on prehistoric and historic peoples and present- day Native American groups along with their associated environments. The purpose behind these studies is to provide background information for the management of and research into these prehistoric, historic, and contemporary resources. This overview is one of seven covering the southern California deserts undertaken as part of a comprehensive planning effort by the Bureau of Land Management for these deserts. Overviews aid in the day-to-day management of cultural resources and in the completion of environmental analyses and research projects. Its general value to the public in the fields of education and recreation-interpretation must also be stressed.
  • Fiscal Years 2021 & 2022 Cucamonga Valley Water

    Fiscal Years 2021 & 2022 Cucamonga Valley Water

    CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA BUDGET FISCAL YEARS 2021 & 2022 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS BUDGET MESSAGE ....................................... 3 Debt .............................................................................................99 District-Wide Goals and Strategies ........................................ 4 DEPARTMENT INFORMATION .................. 102 Notable accomplishments ......................................................... 5 Position Summary Schedule ..................................................103 Short-Term Factors Influencing the Budget .......................... 5 Departmental Descriptions ..................................................105 Significant Budgetary Items ...................................................... 6 Executive Division .................................... 106 Budget Overview ........................................................................ 8 Board of Directors .................................................................107 Resolution NO. 2020-6-1 ........................................................10 Office of the General Manager ............................................109 Goals & Objectives ...................................................................11 Administrative Services Division ............. 111 Budget Guide .............................................................................14 Office of the Assistant General Manager ...........................112 History & Profile .......................................................................16
  • Water Writes Spring 2011 Newsletter

    Water Writes Spring 2011 Newsletter

    CALIFORNIA water writes Esri • Spring 2011 GIS for Water/Wastewater In This Issue Fine Wine to Enterprise GIS Esri on the Road p2 Cucamonga Valley Water District Esri Online p2 Esri News p2 The Cucamonga Valley is an area that lies Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) GIS Puts Culver City Sewer Maps in p6 Their Place between the cities of Los Angeles and San was formed in 1955 as a special district under Bernardino in San Bernardino County, the provisions of Division 12 of the California Subsurface Utilities Mapping Program p8 Decreases Cost and Reduces Risk California. Originally known for its vast State Water Code and is an independent unit of vineyards and wineries, the valley hosted local government. It was formed from 23 small iWater—Take Your GIS to the Next Level p11 60 wineries and over 35,000 acres of vine from agricultural water systems and pipelines and the mid-1800s to the 1940s. In recent years, serves the City of Rancho Cucamonga and sewer connections and an average daily de- most of the vineyards have given way to unprec- portions of the cities of Fontana, Ontario, and mand of approximately 50 million gallons. edented growth in residential, commercial, and Upland. CVWD serves over 180,000 custom- Its water source is from purchased water industrial development, with two wineries and ers within a 47-square-mile service area that (Metropolitan Water District), ground water under 1,000 acres of vineyard remaining. includes 50,000 water connections and 35,000 wells, and surface runoff from the local foot- hill canyons.
  • Listing of Self-Governed Special Districts San Bernardino County

    Listing of Self-Governed Special Districts San Bernardino County

    Listing of Self-Governed Special Districts San Bernardino County Presented courtesy of the Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County 215 North D Street, Suite 204 San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 (909) 383-9900; FAX (909) 383-9901 E-mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.sbclafco.org Updated July 2013 LISTING OF SELF-GOVERNED SPECIAL DISTRICTS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page AIRPORT DISTRICTS 2 CEMETERY DISTRICTS 3 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTS 4 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS 10 HEALTHCARE DISTRICTS 14 MOSQUITO ABATEMENT & VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICTS 16 RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICTS 17 RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICTS 18 SANITATION DISTRICT 19 WATER DISTRICTS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICTS 20 WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS 22 WATER DISTRICTS 23 SPECIAL ACT WATER AGENCIES 32 ASSOCIATION OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SPECIAL DISTRICTS 34 1 Local Agency Formation Commission, County of San Bernardino 215 North D Street, Suite 204, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 AIRPORT DISTRICTS BIG BEAR AIRPORT DISTRICT CONTACT: James “Pete” Gwaltney, Manager 3rd District Formed: 12/17/79 PHONE: (909) 585-3219 Powers: Airport FAX: (909) 585-2900 EMAIL: [email protected] Office Hours: WEBSITE: www.bigbearcityairport.com M – F 7:00 am – 6:00 pm Sat & Sun 8:00 am – 5:00 pm MAIL: P.O. Box 755 Big Bear City, CA 92314 OFFICE: 501 Valley Boulevard Big Bear City, CA 92314 Board of Directors Title Name Term End Date President Julie Smith 2016 Vice President Gary Stube 2014 Director Steve Castillo 2016 Director Steve Baker 2014 Director Chuck Knight 2016 YUCCA VALLEY AIRPORT DISTRICT CONTACT: Chris Hutchins, Board President 3rd District Robert “Bob” Dunn, Vice President/Manager Formed: 6/7/82 Powers: Airport PHONE: (760) 401-0816 FAX: (760) 228-3152 EMAIL: [email protected] Office Hours: WEBSITE: www.yuccavalleyairport.com M – F 8:00 am – 5:00 pm MAIL: P.O.
  • Cucamonga Valley Water District Board of Directors Meeting Agenda

    Cucamonga Valley Water District Board of Directors Meeting Agenda

    ~ ~ Cucamonga Valley ® ~ Water District Service Beyond Expectation CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA February 25, 2020 - 6:00 p.m. District Office, Board Room I 0440 Ashford Street; Rancho Cucamonga, California OUR MISSION The mission of the Cucamonga Valley Water District is to provide high quality, safe and reliable water and wastewater services, while practicing good stewardship of natural and financial resources. I. CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE 2. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO AGENDA 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may comment on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. Comments related to noticed public hearing items will be heard at the time the public hearing is conducted. Speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than five (5) minutes. The President may reduce the time to not less than three (3) minutes depending upon the number of speakers wishing to address the Board. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the Board is prohibited from taking action on items not listed on the agenda. 4. GENERAL MANAGER/CEO REPORTS John Bosler, General A) District Updates Manager/CEO B) IEUA Board Meeting Agenda 5. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the Board request specific items be removed for separate action. A) Approve Minutes of the February I I, 2020 Regular Board Meeting. B) Approve Board Calendar of Events. C) Approve Cash & Investment Report for month ending December 31, 2019.
  • Cucamonga Valley Water District Board of Directors Meeting Agenda

    Cucamonga Valley Water District Board of Directors Meeting Agenda

    .! .! Cucamonga Valley® ~ Water District Service Beyond Expectation CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA October 12, 2021 – 6:00 p.m. District Office, Board Room 10440 Ashford Street; Rancho Cucamonga, California As permitted under AB 361, in an effort to protect public health, prevent the spread of COVID-19 (Coronavirus), and because state and/or local officials are recommending or imposing measures to promote social distancing, the public may participate in this Board meeting virtually. For those who wish to participate virtually, please use the following information: (877) 568-4106, Access Code: 955- 106-309 https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/955106309. Please be advised that members of the public are permitted to attend this meeting in person at the location listed above. OUR MISSION The mission of the Cucamonga Valley Water District is to provide high quality, safe and reliable water and wastewater services, while practicing good stewardship of natural and financial resources. 1. CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE 2. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO AGENDA 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may comment on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. Comments related to noticed public hearing items will be heard at the time the public hearing is conducted. Speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than five (5) minutes. The President may reduce the time to not less than three (3) minutes depending upon the number of speakers wishing to address the Board. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the Board is prohibited from taking action on items not listed on the agenda.
  • Round 3 Program/Project Concepts

    Round 3 Program/Project Concepts

    Round 3 Program/Project Concepts Color Name Agency Program/Project Email Glenn Cajar Chino CA Resident Garden Friendly landscapes [email protected] Nancy Horton City of Canyon Lake Friendly Landscaping [email protected] Linda Nixon City of Hemet Water Rate Structures - efficient Use [email protected] Eric Grubb Cucamonga Valley Water District Tiered Rates [email protected] Eric Grubb Cucamonga Valley Water District Fixed Network/Smart Meters [email protected] Nehal Thumar David Taussig & Associates Water Rate Structures with leak detection [email protected] Brian Powell Eastern Municipal Water District Landscape Guidance Manual [email protected] Brian Powell Eastern Municipal Water District Smart Controllers & Nozzles [email protected] Jesus Gastelum Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Task force to share & Evaluate demand Reduction/Efficiency [email protected] LeAnne Hamilton Inland Empire Utilities Agency Coordinated Rebate Program - Mult. Agencies [email protected] Jason Uhley Riverside County Flood Control and Water LID/StormWater/Use Efficiency/ Flow reduction [email protected] Demand Reduction Conservation District and Water Use Jolene Church Riverside Public Utility Smart Irrigation Controllers [email protected] Efficiency Mark Adelson RWQCB Santa Ana Region Community Based vegetable Gardening project/provide [email protected] community nutrition and produce water quality services Sarah Miggins Southern California Mountain Foundation Outreach [email protected] James
  • 12402 Industrial Boulevard | Victorville, California

    12402 Industrial Boulevard | Victorville, California

    :: OFFERING MEMORANDUM Capital Markets | Private Client Group :: INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT 12402 Industrial Boulevard | Victorville, California Capital Markets | Private Client Group Value Add Institutional Quality Industrial/Office Incubator Park Priced at 50% Below Replacement Cost. TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 Property Summary Investment Summary Investment Highlights 02 Property Location Aerial Photographs Local and Regional Maps 03 Property Description Property Description Site Plan 04 The Market City Overview County Overview Sale Comparables 05 Financials Executive Summary Financing Assumptions Cash Flor Projections Leveraged Summary In-Place NOI vs. Pro-Forma NOI IPRO Forma Income Existing vs. Market Comparison Vacant Space Assumptions Lease Expirations For more information on Foxborough Business Park, please visit our website at Rent Roll www.pcgnb.com/FoxboroughBP Replacement Cost 3 FOXBOROUGH BUSINESS PARK | Property Summary 01 Property Summary Investment Summary Investment Highlights PROPERTY SUMMARY Investment Summary Investment Highlights Foxborough Business Park “Value Add” Industrial/Office Park Opportunity Priced at $8,250,000 ($64 PSF) which is significantly below 12402 Industrial Boulevard x Rare opportunity to acquire a seven building business the estimated replacement cost of $16,095,765 ($126 PSF) Victorville, CA 92395 park that is divided into 35 units. x Low future risk once the project is leased, of major Ideal Victorville Business Park Location Purchase Price ....................................$8,250,000 vacancy due to 35
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

    16576 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Rules and Regulations Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *. establishment of definite American bonded wineries within the proposed Par. 2. Section 18.0 is revised to read viticultural areas. The regulations also area, and approximately 2,000 acres are as follows: allow the name of an approved planted to wine grapes. The petitioner viticultural area to be used as an notes ``the area's great history and § 18.0 Effective date of temporary appellation of origin in the labeling and heritage of wine growing and regulations under the Subchapter S advertising of wine. winemaking is truly more impressive Revision Act of 1982. On October 2, 1979, ATF published than the number of acres currently The temporary regulations provided Treasury Decision ATF±60 (44 FR farmed.'' under §§ 18.1361±1, 18.1377±1, 56692) which added a new part 9 to 27 The petition was also signed by Philo 18.1379±1, and 18.1379±2 are effective CFR, providing for the listing of Biane of Rancho de Philo Winery, Rene with respect to taxable years beginning approved American viticultural areas. Biane of Guasti Plaza, Don Galleano of after 1982, and the temporary Section 4.25a(e)(1), Title 27, CFR, Galleano Winery, Paul Hofer III of Hofer regulations provided under § 18.1378±1 defines an American viticultural area as Ranch, LeAnn Smothers of the City of are effective with respect to elections a delimited grape-growing region Rancho Cucamonga, and Jeff Wilson, of made after October 19, 1982. distinguishable by geographical Inland Empire West Resource Cynthia E.
  • Milebymile.Com Personal Road Trip Guide California State Highway #18

    Milebymile.Com Personal Road Trip Guide California State Highway #18

    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide California State Highway #18 Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 San Bernardino, CA Community of San Bernardino, California, a large city located in San -Junction of California Bernardino County, California, Attractions: Arrowhead Springs Hotel State Route #210/30 and Spa, a historic hotel & Spa located in the Arrowhead Springs neighborhood, Arrowhead geological monument, which is California Historical Landmark, Original McDonald's Site and Museum, SB Raceway Indoor Karting. Altitude: 1234 feet 2.9 Arrowhead Springs Road: Arrowhead Springs Road, Old Waterman Canyon Road, Campus Hot Springs Crusade for Christ, Arrowhead Springs Hot Lake, Altitude: 1788 feet 4.9 Cloudland Truck Trail Cloudland Truck Trail, Sweetwater Percolation Basin, Altitude: 2477 feet 11.3 Junction Junction California State Route #138, to, Crestline, California, a community in the San Bernardino Mountains of San Bernardino County, California, Lake Gregory Regional Park, Lake Gregory, a man-made lake and a county park Crestline, California, Altitude: 4390 feet 14.1 Squirrel Inn Squirrel Inn Road/California Route #189, N Road, Twin Pikes Road/California Route #189 Community Church, Calvary Chapel Conference Center, Blue Jay, California, a town in San Bernardino County, California. Altitude: 5144 feet 16.8 Daley Canyon Road: Daley Canyon Road, connects with California Route #189, Lake Country Club Arrowhead Country Club, Grass Valley Lake Park, State Route #173 traverses the Sand Bernardino Mountains, Blue Jay Bay, on Lake Arrowhead, a community in San Bernardino County, California, within the San Bernardino National Forest. Altitude: 5581 feet 17.2 Access Road: Robert Access Road, to, Robert Brownlee Observatory, an astronomical Brownlee Observatory observatory, located in Lake Arrowhead, California, just off California State Highway #18, Altitude: 5699 feet 18.2 California Route #173: California Route #173, to, Lake Arrowhead, California, a community in Lake San Bernardino County, California, within the San Bernardino National Forest.
  • APPENDIX a Revised Cultural Resources Technical Report

    APPENDIX a Revised Cultural Resources Technical Report

    APPENDIX A Revised Cultural Resources Technical Report CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT for the ETIWANDA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD AND CONSERVATION PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Sargent Town Planning 706 South Hill Street, 11th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90014 Contact: David Sargent Prepared by: Adriane Dorrler, BA, Micah Hale, PhD, RPA, Kate Kaiser, MSHP, Linda Kry, BA, and Rachel Hoerman, PhD, RPA 38 N. Marengo Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 JUNE 2019 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan, Rancho Cucamonga, California NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE (NADB) INFORMATION Authors: Adriane Dorrler, BA, Micah Hale, PhD, RPA, and Kate Kaiser, MSHP Firm: Dudek Project Proponent: Sargent Town Planning 706 South Hill Street, 11th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90014 Contact: David Sargent Report Date: June 2019 Report Title: Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan, Rancho Cucamonga, California Type of Study: Cultural Resources Inventory and Significance Evaluation New Sites: Temporary Designations: 9020-AD-02, 9020-AV-01, 9020-BC-01, 9020- ISO-PH-01, 9020-ISO-AD-01, 9020-ISO-KS-01 Updated Sites: None USGS Quads: Rancho Cucamonga Peak, Mount Baldy, Devore, CA 1:24,000; T 1N / R 6W, 7W Acreage: Approximately 4,388 acres Keywords: survey, intensive, positive results, evaluation, historic refuse scatter, bedrock milling station, 4,388 acres, City of Rancho Cucamonga 9020 i January 2019 Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan, Rancho Cucamonga, California INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 9020 ii January 2019 Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan Rancho Cucamonga, California TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No.