DOCSLIB.ORG

Sac and Fox Tribe Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sac and Fox Tribe Brief Case: 13-2446 Document: 003111429913 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/23/2013 Nos. 13-2446 & 13-2451 _________________ In The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit _________________ JOHN THORPE; SAC AND FOX NATION OF OKLAHOMA; WILLIAM THORPE; and RICHARD THORPE; Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. BOROUGH OF JIM THORPE; MICHAEL SOFRANKO; RONALD CONFER; JOHN McGUIRE; JOSEPH MARZEN; W. TODD MASON; JEREMY MELBER; JUSTIN YAICH; JOSEPH KREBS; GREG STRUBINGER; KYLE SHECKLER; and JOANNE KLITSCH; Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees. _________________ On Appeal from an Order Entered by the Honorable A. Richard Caputo, United States District Judge, Middle District of Pennsylvania, No. 3:10-cv-1317-ARC. _________________ BRIEF OF THE APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS _________________ CHARLES L. RIDDLE STEPHEN R. WARD RIDDLE PATENT LAW, LLC DANIEL E. GOMEZ 434 LACKAWANNA AVENUE, SUITE 200 CONNER & WINTERS, LLP SCRANTON, PENNSYLVANIA 18503 4000 ONE WILLIAMS CENTER (570) 344-4439 TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74172-0148 (918) 586-8978 Attorneys for Appellees/Cross-Appellants October 23, 2013 Case: 13-2446 Document: 003111429913 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/23/2013 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Third 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, the Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants hereby make the following disclosures: For purposes of this action, the following are the parent companies and publicly held corporations, along with their subsidiaries and affiliates, that own a ten percent (10%) or more interest in any Appellee/Cross-Appellant, or that have a financial interest in the outcome of this litigation: None. The Appellees are individuals and a federally-recognized Indian tribe. Respectfully submitted, s/ Stephen R. Ward Charles L. Riddle Stephen R. Ward, Okla. Bar No. 13610 RIDDLE PATENT LAW, LLC CONNER & WINTERS, LLP 434 Lackawanna Avenue, Suite 200 4000 One Williams Center Scranton, Pennsylvania 18503 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74172-0148 (570) 344-4439 (918) 586-8978 [email protected] Attorneys for Appellees/Cross-Appellants i Case: 13-2446 Document: 003111429913 Page: 3 Date Filed: 10/23/2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ................................................................................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..................................................................................... v JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT .......................................................................... 1 ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ..................................................................... 2 STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES AND PROCEEDINGS .............................. 3 STATEMENT OF THE CASE .................................................................................. 4 STATEMENT OF FACTS ........................................................................................ 7 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ...................................................................... 16 STANDARDS OF REVIEW ................................................................................... 17 ARGUMENT & AUTHORITIES ........................................................................... 19 I. BASED UPON ITS PLAIN STATUTORY LANGUAGE, THE DISTRICT COURT CORRECTLY APPLIED NAGPRA TO THE REMAINS OF JIM THORPE AND TO THE BOROUGH ......................... 19 A. NAGPRA Unambiguously Encompasses All Native American Human Remains and Is Not Limited to Ancient or Prehistoric Burials.................................................................................................. 20 B. Although Resort to Legislative History is Unnecessary, Application of NAGPRA in the Case is Consistent with the Purpose of the Law .............................................................................. 25 C. Application of NAGPRA to the Facts of this Case is Consistent with its Purpose and is Not Legally “Absurd” or “Bizarre” ............... 29 ii Case: 13-2446 Document: 003111429913 Page: 4 Date Filed: 10/23/2013 D. The Borough Has Failed to Identify Any Valid Constitutional or Other Concerns that Would Prevent the Application of NAGPRA ............................................................................................. 33 II. THE BOROUGH FALLS WITHIN THE BROAD DEFINITION OF A “MUSEUM” UNDER NAGPRA, AND IT HAS OFFERED NO VALID DEFENSE TO THE STATUTE’S APPLICATION ................ 38 A. The Borough Has Received “Federal Funds” and Therefore Falls Within Congress’s Definition of a “Museum” ........................... 39 B. The Borough’s “Right of Possession” Argument Has Been Waived and is Not a Defense to Repatriation of Human Remains ............................................................................................... 44 III. EVEN IF SUCH A DEFENSE IS APPLICABLE TO NAGPRA, THE EQUITABLE DOCTRINE OF LACHES WOULD NOT BAR A REPATRIATION, ..................................................................................... 49 A. The District Court Properly Found No Prejudice that Would Allow the Borough to Assert a Laches Defense to the Mandates of NAGPRA ........................................................................................ 50 B. The Borough Has, as a Matter of Law, Failed to Meet Its Burden in Establishing a Laches Defense ........................................... 52 IV. THE CROSS-APPELLANTS SATISFIED THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A CLAIM UNDER § 1983 TO REMEDY THE BOROUGH’S DENIAL OF THEIR RECOGNIZED RIGHTS .......... 55 A. The Borough’s Refusal to Comply with NAGPRA Comprised a Longstanding Practice or Custom that Supports a Claim Under § 1983 .................................................................................................. 56 B. Section 1983 Claims Are Unavailable Only Where Congress Specifically Has Foreclosed the Remedy Through Elaborate Enforcement Mechanisms ................................................................... 58 C. The Enforcement Provisions in NAGPRA Do Not Provide a Comprehensive or Exclusive Remedy that Forecloses a Claim Under § 1983 ....................................................................................... 64 iii Case: 13-2446 Document: 003111429913 Page: 5 Date Filed: 10/23/2013 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 66 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ..................................................................... xiii CERTIFICATE OF BAR MEMBERSHIP ............................................................. xiv CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ................................................................................ xv iv Case: 13-2446 Document: 003111429913 Page: 6 Date Filed: 10/23/2013 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, ___ U.S. ___, 133 S. Ct. 2552 (2013) .................... 34 Bentley v. Cleveland County Board of County Commissioners, 41 F.3d 600 (10th Cir. 1994) ................................................................................. 40, 42-44 Bermuda Express, N.V. v. M/V Litsa (Ex. Laurie U), 872 F.2d 554 (3d Cir. 1989) .................................................................................................. 18, 19, 51 Blessing v. Freestone, 520 U.S. 329, 117 S. Ct. 1353 (1997) ........................... 59-61 Bonnichsen v. United States Department of the Army, 367 F.3d 864 (9th Cir. 2004) .............................................................................................................. 25 Bushman v. Halm, 798 F.2d 651 (3d Cir. 1986) ...................................................... 18 Chapman v. Higbee Co., 319 F.3d 825 (6th Cir. 2003) ........................................... 29 Cheruku v. Attorney General of the United States, 662 F.3d 198 (3d Cir. 2011) .............................................................................................................. 54 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S. Ct. 2778 (1984) ........................................................................... 21 City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams, 544 U.S. 113, 125 S. Ct. 1453 (2005) ....................................................................................................... 62-64 City of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Austin, 816 F. Supp. 351 (E.D. Pa. 1993) .... 52, 54 Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia, 6 F.3d 990 (3d Cir. 1993) ....................................................... 35 County of Yakima v. Yakima Indian Nation, 502 U.S. 251, 112 S. Ct. 683 (1992) ............................................................................................................. 20 Covelo Indian Community v. Watt, 551 F. Supp. 366 (D.D.C. 1982) ............... 53-54 v Case: 13-2446 Document: 003111429913 Page: 7 Date Filed: 10/23/2013 Cyberworld Entertainment Technologies, Inc. v. Napolitano, 602 F.3d 189 (3d Cir. 2010) ................................................................................................. 50 Dutton v. Wolpoff & Abramson, 5 F.3d 649 (3d Cir. 1993) .................................... 30 E.E.O.C. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F.2d 69 (3d Cir. 1984) ............ 50 English v. General Electric Co., 496 U.S. 72, 110 S. Ct. 2270 (1990) ................... 36 Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee, 555 U.S. 246, 129 S. Ct. 788 (2009) ............................................................................................. 2, 59, 63-65 Free v. Bland, 369
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Family Type and Incidence
    EVER TOWARDS THE SETTING SUN THEY PUSH US: AMERICAN INDIAN IDENTITY IN THE WRITINGS OF MARY ALICIA OWEN _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by GREG OLSON Dr. Susan Flader, Thesis Supervisor Dr. Jeffrey Pasley, Thesis Supervisor JULY 2009 The undersigned, approved by the Dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled EVER TOWARDS THE SETTING SUN THEY PUSH US: AMERICAN INDIAN IDENTITY IN THE WRITINGS OF MARY ALICIA OWEN Presented by Greg Olson A candidate for the degree of Master of Arts And hereby certify that in their opinion it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Susan Flader Professor Jeffery Pasley Professor Joanna Hearne To Rebecca Schroeder, who introduced me to the work of Mary Alicia Owen. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my thesis committee for their support, suggestions, and dedication. Their patience and guidance were critical in helping me complete this project. This thesis began as a research paper, which I wrote for Dr. Robert Collins in a history seminar at the University of Missouri-Columbia. Thanks to Dr. Collins and to my fellow students for their ideas and suggestions. I would also like to thank Dr. R. Lee Lyman, chair of the Department of Anthropology at the University of Missouri-Columbia, for taking the time to comment on an early version of this thesis. Thanks also to Bill Stolz at the Western Historical Manuscripts Collection- Columbia, to Kate Kiel and Linda Endersby at the Missouri State Museum, and to the staff of the special collections department of the Missouri Western State University Library for their help in steering me to many of the primary sources used in this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
    [Show full text]
  • The Sauk Language of the Sac and Fox of Oklahoma
    Language Preservation with the Help of Written Language: The Sauk Language of the Sac and Fox of Oklahoma KERSTIN MULLER REINSCHMIDT University of Tucson Ta ka we na nu ta ma. Ke ne no ta we?1 The chances of coming across a tribal member who can understand these phrases are small, because the tribe's main spoken language today is English. The Sac and Fox of Oklahoma2 have not been spared by history and share the fate of native language loss along with the majority of Indian communities across North America. Writing about the Mohawk language, Mithun and Chafe (1979:8) see the value of native languages as "the clearest symbols of their Indianness", and they ask: "Is such a loss inevitable, or, given the desire, can a community do something to retard or reverse it?" In this paper, I focus on Sauk orthography. Brandt (1988:328), who shows how linguists have served as consultants for North American tribes in various contexts, notes that "A central [context] is in orthography development and in teaching people to read and write their own languages."3 Within the contemporary context of literacy, Sauk needs to be visible as well as audible. Unfortunately, there has never been any agreement about the orthography to be used. While linguistic transcriptions vary from very detailed phonetic ones to more simplified phonemic representa­ tions, the Sac and Fox themselves have adopted what they call a "syllabic spelling" for their language. 1 "I speak a little Sauk. Do you understand?" The spelling is adopted from the Sac and Fox Primer Book (1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 94-189 94Th Congress an Act to Provide for the Disposition of Funds Appropriated to Pay Certain Indian Claims Dec
    PUBLIC LAW 94-189—DEC. 31, 1975 89 STAT. 1093 Public Law 94-189 94th Congress An Act To provide for the disposition of funds appropriated to pay certain Indian Claims Dec. 31. 1975 Commission judgments in favor of the Sac and Fox Indians, and for other [H.R. 4016] purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following Indians. funds: Sac and Fox (1) the funds appropriated by the Act of October 21, 1968 Indians. Judgement funds. (82 Stat. 1190,1198), to pay a judgment to the Sac and Fox Tribe of Oklahoma and the Sac and Fox Tribe of Mississippi in Iowa in Indian Claims Commission docket 219; (2) the funds appropriated by the Acts of July 6, 1970 (84 Stat. 376), and March 21, 1972 (86 Stat. 86), to pay judgments to the Sac and Fox Nation in Indian Claims Commission dockets 153 and 135, respectively; (3) any funds whioh are now or which may hereafter be appro­ priated to satisfy any final award of the Indian Claims Commis­ sion to the Sac and Fox Nation in dockets 158, 231, and 83; and (4) the amount of $20,421.78 from funds appropriated by the Act of June 12, 1975 (89 Stat. 193, 194), to pay a judgment to the Sac and Fox Nation in Indian Claims Commission docket 95, shall, together with interest earned thereon and after the payment of attorney fees and other litigation expenses, be distributed as here­ inafter provided.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chickasaw Nation, Muscogee Creek Nation, Sac & Fox Nation, and Choctaw Nation Present
    The Chickasaw Nation, Muscogee Creek Nation, Sac & Fox Nation, and Choctaw Nation present NATIVE AMERICAN Language & Culture Newspapers for this educational program provided by: Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................3 List of Tribes in Oklahoma ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 The Chickasaw Nation ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................5-8 Sac & Fox Nation ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................9-13 Choctaw Nation ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................14-18
    [Show full text]
  • Central Plains Region
    Research Guides for both historic and modern Native Communities relating to records held at the National Archives Arkansas Kansas Missouri Oklahoma Introduction Introduction Introduction Introduction Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Sample Document Delegates from 34 tribes in front of Creek Council House, Indian Joseph Matthews, Osage council member, author, historian, and Territory, 1880. National Archives. Rhodes Scholar, seated at home in front of his fireplace, https://catalog.archives.gov/id/519141 Oklahoma. December 16, 1937. National Archives. https://www.archives.gov/research/native- americans/pictures/select-list-082.html National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Arkansas Native Communities There was a great deal movement of Native People from, to and across Arkansas in the early nineteenth century. Therefore, in order to perform a simple search of the GENERAL records of Arkansas’ Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog it is best to focus on National Park Service historic place applications, Osage and Quapaw records before 1824, and records of the Five Civilized Tribes as they traveled across Arkansas. Use the following search terms: Removal (Advanced Search, using Record Group 75) and “Arkansas Indian” (include quotation marks). The much broader search, Arkansas Indian, will have to be narrowed further by date range and document type. There are several great resources available for general information and material for kids about the Native People of Arkansas, such as the Native Languages and National Museum of the American Indian websites.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Jurisdictions in Oklahoma
    TRIBAL JURISDICTIONS IN OKLAHOMA IKE 385 69 P 59 N 325 R 23 U 83 283 183 CHILOCCO35 INDIAN 169 T 8 81 18 44 54 281 SCHOOL LANDS 75 56 10 NOWATA 136 64 132 95 10 59 10C TEXAS 64 11 KAW WOODS GRANT 177 64 KAY ALFALFA 11A OSAGE 64 58 99 DELAWARE TRIBE 25 OTTAWA 325 412 94 11 11 11 60 64 OF INDIANS 10 64 BEAVER CIMARRON HARPER 11 CRAIG 125 74 2 171 50 77 RS 270 60 GE 3 149 RO L 38 IL 14 385 60 W 69 60 28 60 95 TONKAWA N 136 64 64 59 54 3 183 123 O 412 270 34 25 8 T 287 54 PONCA 83 OSAGE G 82 45 N 59 I 66 23 CHEROKEE 283 64 156 11 H 45 15 177 S 46 169 A ROGERS 270 75 28 W 45 28 34C 50B 15 15 20 20 15 OTOE - E K NOBLE 77 66 I MISSOURIA P MAYES 15 88 N 60 R WOODWARD 60 64 U 20 281 CIMARRON 20 44 T 69 59 15 50 412 PAWNEE 74 99 58 412 20 34 MAJOR DELAWARE 116 64 64 S 164 R 18 E 69A G 88 TURNPIKE PAWNEE O 412A TURNPIKE 266 R 412B 8 L CHEROKEE GARFIELD 412 L 412 183 60 I 412A 132 81 W 58 35 412 E 82 108 244 K I 60 P 60 132 N 51A R 51 51 U 51 51 T ELLIS 97 44 10 281 45 51 TULSA M ADAIR 99 48 U 8 KINGFISHER 74D 177 18 EK SK RE O Inset of Northeast Corner PAYNE C GE 82 77 CREEK E 283 E IK 62 81 33 P CHEROKEE N WAGONER E 33 R 64 LOGAN U 51 59 K 34 58 T I TU P 74C R R 51 DEWEY E 66 NP 183 N IK 80 UNITED KEETOOWAH N 8A R 75 E U 69 51 69A R IOWA 16 T 72 16 BAND OF CHEROKEES U 51B T 105 105 3 QUAPAW 47 33 MUSCOGEE (CREEK) 104 100 33 62 82 MIAMI 69 47 66 44 270 74F 44 75A 30 177 35 M 47 81 74 16 64 16 U E NPIK 165 S TUR 66 K ROGER CUSTER O 100 44 G 10 33 52 E MILLS BLAINE SAC AND FOX E 33 283 54 4 66 R RNE MUSKOGEE 47 TU 56 T 10A CHEYENNE - ARAPAHO TURNPIKE
    [Show full text]
  • American Indians in Oklahoma OKLAHOMA HISTORY CENTER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
    American Indians in Oklahoma OKLAHOMA HISTORY CENTER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Nawa! That means hello in the Pawnee language. In Oklahoma, thirty-eight federally recognized tribes represent about 8 percent of the population. Most of these tribes came from places around the country but were removed from their homelands to Oklahoma in the nineteenth century. Their diverse cultures and rich heritage make Oklahoma (which combines the Choctaw words “okla” and “huma,” or “territory of the red people”) a special state. American Indians have impacted Oklahoma’s growth from territory to statehood and have made it into the great state it is today. This site allows you to learn more about American Indian tribes in Oklahoma. First, read the background pages for more information, then go through the biographies of influential American Indians to learn more about him or her. The activities section has coloring sheets, games, and other activities, which can be done as part of a group or on your own. Map of Indian Territory prior to 1889 (ITMAP.0035, Oklahoma Historical Society Map Collection, OHS). American Indians │2016 │1 Before European Contact The first people living on the prairie were the ancestors of various American Indian tribes. Through archaeology, we know that the plains have been inhabited for centuries by groups of people who lived in semi-permanent villages and depended on planting crops and hunting animals. Many of the ideas we associate with American Indians, such as the travois, various ceremonies, tipis, earth lodges, and controlled bison hunts, come from these first prairie people. Through archaeology, we know that the ancestors of the Wichita and Caddo tribes have been in present-day Oklahoma for more than two thousand years.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Consultation Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas Joint EIS/BLM Resource Management Plan and BIA Integrated Resource Management Plan
    OKLAHOMA, KANSAS, AND TEXAS OKLAHOMA, KANSAS, AND TEXAS DRAFT JOINT US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DRAFT JOINT ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IMPACT STATEMENT STATEMENT BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT AND BLM BLMRESOURCE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN PLAN AND BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS BIA INTEGRATEDBIA INTEGRATED RESOURCE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT PLANPLAN Tribal Consultation Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas Joint EIS/BLM Resource Management Plan and BIA Integrated Resource Management Plan Consultation with Federally recognized Indian tribes is part of the National Environmental Policy Act process and a requirement of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act. During the preparation of this Joint EIS, the BLM and BIA have engaged with the following Federally recognized Indian tribes in the planning area: • Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of • Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Oklahoma • Modoc Tribe of Oklahoma • Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas • Muscogee (Creek) Nation • Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town • The Osage Nation • Apache Tribe of Oklahoma • Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians • Caddo Nation of Oklahoma • Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma • Cherokee Nation • Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma • Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes • Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma • The Chickasaw Nation • Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma • The Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma • Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation • Citizen Potawatomi Nation • Quapaw Tribe of Indians • Comanche Nation • Sac and Fox Nation • Delaware Nation • Sac and Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas • Delaware Tribe of Indians
    [Show full text]
  • 42 Ibia 160 (01/25/2006)
    INTERIOR BOARD OF INDIAN APPEALS Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. Director, Office of Self-Governance, Bureau of Indian Affairs 42 IBIA 160 (01/25/2006) Related Board case: 28 IBIA 169 Judicial review: Defendant's (Interior's) Motion for Summary Judgment Granted, Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. Salazar, 624 F.Supp.2d 103 (D.D.C. 2009) United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS INTERIOR BOARD OF INDIAN APPEALS 801 NORTH QUINCY STREET SUITE 300 ARLINGTON, VA 22203 CITIZEN POTAWATOMI NATION, : Order Affirming Decision Appellant, : : v. : : Docket No. IBIA 04-16-A DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF SELF- : GOVERNANCE, BUREAU OF : INDIAN AFFAIRS, : Appellee. : January 25, 2006 Appellant Citizen Potawatomi Nation (Citizen Potawatomi) seeks review of a pre- award dispute with the Director, Office of Self-Governance (Director), regarding the Citizen Potawatomi’s 2004 Annual Funding Agreement (AFA) with the Department of the Interior (Department). The dispute pertains to a determination by the Director not to include $65,521 in the 2004 AFA that the Citizen Potawatomi claim is owed to them, and to the Director’s manner of applying a funding formula agreed to in 1988 by the five tribes served by the Shawnee Agency of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). For the reasons stated below, the Board affirms the Director’s decisions. Background Under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDA), 25 U.S.C. §§ 450 et seq., the United States is authorized to enter into compacts with Indian tribes. Pursuant to that Act, tribes do not contract to take over specific programs; rather, they assume comprehensive responsibility for the planning and administration of programs and services previously provided by the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins and Meanings of the Meskwaki Powwow
    AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURE AND RESEARCH JOURNAL 33:4 (2009) 1–28 “To Show the Public That We Were Good Indians”: Origins and Meanings of the Meskwaki Powwow STEPHEN WARREN On 19 June 1916, one hundred thousand tourists gathered together in Rock Island, Illinois, to watch an “Old Indian Village” go up in flames. President Wilson foreshadowed this theater of genocide earlier that evening. From the oval office, Wilson pushed a button that resulted in the electrification of the Fort Armstrong Centennial Celebration. The following morning celebrants woke up from this awesome display of regeneration through violence and attended a historical pageant named Progress.1 Members of the Red Men of Davenport and the Ladies Auxiliary reenacted the 1780 battle in which George Rogers Clark descended on a Sac Indian village on the Rock River and destroyed it. After the 1916 reenactment, The Rock Island Argus reported that as the village smoldered, “an Indian prophet rose proclaiming the early close of the supremacy of the red man and the approach of the day when the white would rule.” The newspaper promoted the event with a headline that read: “Tribal Ceremonies Exemplified, After Which Whites Attack and Leave Place Mass of Ruins.” At first glance, the Fort Armstrong Centennial Celebration confirms the scientific racism of the age. But the Progress exhibit could not have taken place without the help of Meskwaki tribal members who were paid to build the Old Indian Village that later went up in flames. The Fort Armstrong Centennial Celebration was just one event in a series of field days, powwows, and pageants in which Native and non-Native worlds came together.
    [Show full text]
  • Sac & Fox of Oklahoma Housing Authority Title VI Program Creating
    ONAP BEST PRACTICE January 2016 Sac & Fox of Oklahoma Housing Authority Title VI Program Creating an effective team can mean a successful project with minimal complications. The Sac & Fox Nation Housing Authority (SFHA), Sac & Fox Nation, Bear Claw Construction, BancFirst, the SFHA general counsel, City of Shawnee, Pottawatomi County Officials and HUD collaborated and held a series of focus driven meetings to foster the progression of a loan through the Title VI loan process. Joint underwriting between the Southern Plains Office of Native American Programs and HUD’s Office of Loan Guarantee seamlessly provided on-going technical assistance to the partnership. The collaboration resulted in the development of a $2.5 million dollar apartment complex that will address 46% of the SFHA needs for immediate housing assistance. The $1.5 million dollar NAHASDA Title VI Loan supplemented with an additional $1 million in NAHASDA funding from the annual block grant for the SFHA means that 23 families will have a new place to call home. This is the first large scale project the SFHA has taken on since the termination of the 1937 Housing Act funding. The SFHA has continued to develop units; however, a large scale multifamily dwelling is a welcome boost to their ability to serve the Native population. Brad Campbell, CEO and Principal Owner of Bear Claw Construction stated, “It has been a pleasure working together collaboratively with HUD, The Sac and Fox Nation and Amanda Procter - the lead attorney for the Housing Authority. It is an honor and privilege to work with our Tribal Communities and Housing Directors, like Billy Komacheet, to ensure our team of professionals is providing the best housing possible for our Tribal Members.
    [Show full text]