DOCSLIB.ORG

American Indian and Alaska Native Classification (Source: 2010 Census Race Classification)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2020 Census Tribal Consultation Meetings American Indian and Alaska Native Classification (Source: 2010 Census Race Classification) AMERICAN INDIAN TRIBES Abenaki Abenaki Nation of Missisquoi Koasek (Cowasuck) Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation Algonquian Algonquian Apache Apache Fort Sill Apache (Chiricahua) Jicarilla Apache Nation Lipan Apache Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation, New Mexico Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Tonto Apache Tribe of Arizona San Carlos Apache Tribe of the San Carlos Reservation White Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort Apache Reservation, Arizona Arapaho Arapaho Northern Arapaho Southern Arapaho Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming Assiniboine Assiniboine Assiniboine Sioux Assiniboine Sioux Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation Fort Peck Assiniboine Fort Peck Sioux Blackfeet Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation of Montana Brotherton Brotherton Burt Lake Burt Lake Chippewa Burt Lake Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Burt Lake Ottawa Page 1 of 33 2020 Census Tribal Consultation Meetings American Indian and Alaska Native Classification (Source: 2010 Census Race Classification) Caddo Caddo Caddo Nation of Oklahoma Caddo Adais Indians Cahuilla Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Cahuilla Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians Morongo Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians Ramona Band or Village of Cahuilla California Tribes Cahto Indian Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria Chimariko Kawaiisu Kern River Paiute Council Mattole Red Wood Santa Rosa Indian Community Takelma Wappo Yana Yuki Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria California Valley Miwok Tribe Redding Rancheria, California Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria Catawba Catawba Indian Nation Cayuse Cayuse Chehalis Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, Washington Chemakuan Chemakuan Hoh Indian Tribe of the Hoh Reservation, Washington Quileute Tribe of the Quileute Reservation, Washington Chemehuevi Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Page 2 of 33 2020 Census Tribal Consultation Meetings American Indian and Alaska Native Classification (Source: 2010 Census Race Classification) Cherokee Cherokee Cherokee Alabama Cherokee Tribe of Northeast Alabama Cher-O-Creek Intratribal Indians (Cherokees of Southeast Alabama) Eastern Band of Cherokees Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama Georgia Eastern Cherokee Northern Cherokee Nation of Missouri and Arkansas Tuscola United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma (Western Cherokee) Southeastern Cherokee Council Sac River Band of the Chickamauga-Cherokee White River Band of the Chickamauga-Cherokee Four Winds Cherokee Cherokee of Georgia Piedmont American Indian Association-Lower Eastern Cherokee Nation SC (PAIA) United Cherokee Ani-Yun-Wiya Nation Cherokee Bear Clan of South Carolina Cheyenne Cheyenne Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Reservation, Montana Southern Cheyenne Cheyenne-Arapaho Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, Oklahoma Chickahominy Chickahominy Indian Tribe Chickahominy Eastern Band Chickasaw Chickasaw Nation Chaloklowa Chickasaw Chinook Chinook Clatsop Columbia River Chinook Kathlamet Upper Chinook Wakiakum Chinook Willapa Chinook Wishram Page 3 of 33 2020 Census Tribal Consultation Meetings American Indian and Alaska Native Classification (Source: 2010 Census Race Classification) Chippewa Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe Bay Mills Indian Community Bois Forte Band of Chippewa Chippewa Fond du Lac Grand Portage Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Keweenaw Bay Indian Community Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Lac du Flambeau Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians Lake Superior Chippewa Leech Lake Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana Mille Lacs Minnesota Chippewa Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe St. Croix Chippewa Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians Sokaogon Chippewa Community Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians of North Dakota White Earth Swan Creek Black River Confederate Tribe Chippewa Cree Chippewa-Cree Indians of the Rocky Boy's Reservation Chitimacha Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana Pointe Au-Chien Indian Tribe Choctaw Choctaw Clifton Choctaw Jena Band of Choctaw Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians MOWA Band of Choctaw Indians Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Choctaw-Apache Choctaw-Apache Community of Ebarb Chumash Chumash Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians San Luis Rey Mission Indian Clear Lake Clear Lake Page 4 of 33 2020 Census Tribal Consultation Meetings American Indian and Alaska Native Classification (Source: 2010 Census Race Classification) Coeur D’Alene Coeur D’Alene Tribe Coharie Coharie Indian Tribe Colorado River Indian Colorado River Indian Tribes Colville Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation Comanche Comanche Nation, Oklahoma Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians Coos Coos Coquille Coquille Indian Tribe Costanoan Costanoan Coushatta Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas Coushatta Cowlitz Cowlitz Indian Tribe Cree Cree Creek Alabama Creek Alabama Quassarte Tribal Town Muscogee (Creek) Nation Eastern Creek Eastern Muscogee Kialegee Tribal Town Lower Muscogee Creek Tama Tribal Town MaChis Lower Creek Indian Tribe Creek--Con. Poarch Band of Creek Indians Principal Creek Indian Nation Lower Creek Muscogee Tribe East, Star Clan Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Page 5 of 33 2020 Census Tribal Consultation Meetings American Indian and Alaska Native Classification (Source: 2010 Census Race Classification) Tuckabachee Croatan Croatan Crow Crow Tribe of Montana Cumberland Cumberland County Association for Indian People Cupeno Agua Caliente Cupeno Delaware Delaware (Lenni-Lenape) Delaware Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma Munsee Delaware Nation Ramapough Lenape Nation (Ramapough Mountain) New Jersey Sand Hill Band of Indians, Inc Allegheny Lenape Diegueno (Kumeyaay) Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians Diegueno (Kumeyaay) La Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians Manzanita Band of Diegueno Mission Indians Mesa Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians San Pasqual Band of Diegueno Mission Indians Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation Viejas (Baron Long) Group of Capitan Grande Band Inaja Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Inaja and Cosmit Reservation Jamul Indian Village Eastern Tribes Attacapa Biloxi Georgetown Moor Eastern Tribes--Con. Nansemond Indian Tribe Natchez Indian Tribe of South Carolina (Kusso-Natchez; Edisto) Nausu Waiwash Golden Hill Paugussett Pocomoke Acohonock Southeastern Indians Page 6 of 33 2020 Census Tribal Consultation Meetings American Indian and Alaska Native Classification (Source: 2010 Census Race Classification) Susquehanock Biloxi-Chitimacha-Choctaw Confederation Tunica Biloxi Indian Tribe of Louisiana Waccamaw Siouan Indian Tribe Beaver Creek Indians Wicomico Meherrin Indian Tribe Santee Indian Organization Santee Indian Nation of South Carolina Pee Dee Indian Tribe of South Carolina Pee Dee Indian Nation of Upper South Carolina Esselen Esselen Fort Belknap Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Reservation Three Affiliated Tribes of North Dakota Three Affiliated Tribes of Ft. Berthold Reservation, North Dakota Mandan Hidatsa Arikara (Sahnish) Fort McDowell Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Fort Hall Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation Lemhi-Shoshone Bannock Gabrieleno Gabrieleno Fernandeno Tataviam Band of Mission Indians Fernandeno Tataviam Band of Mission Indians Grand Ronde Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon Guilford Guilford Native American Association Gros Ventres Atsina Gros Ventres Haliwa-Saponi Haliwa-Saponi Indian Tribe Ho-Chunk Nation Page 7 of 33 2020 Census Tribal Consultation Meetings American Indian and Alaska Native Classification (Source: 2010 Census Race Classification) Ho-Chunk Nation Hoopa Hoopa Valley Tribe Trinity Whilkut Hopi Hopi Tribe of Arizona Arizona Tewa Hoopa Extension Hoopa Extension Houma United Houma Nation Iowa Iowa Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma Sappony (Indians of Person County) Sappony Iroquois Cayuga Nation Iroquois Mohawk Oneida Onondaga Nation Seneca Seneca Nation Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians Tuscarora Nation Wyandotte Nation, Oklahoma Oneida Nation of New York Juaneno (Acjachemem) Juaneno (Acjachemem) Kalispel Kalispel Indian Community Karuk Karuk Tribe of California Kaw Kaw Nation Kickapoo Page 8 of 33 2020 Census Tribal Consultation Meetings American Indian and Alaska Native Classification (Source: 2010 Census Race Classification) Kickapoo Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas Kickapoo Tribe of Indians in Kansas Kiowa Kiowa Kiowa Indian Tribe of Oklahoma S’Klallam Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe of Washington Klallam Lower Elwha Tribal Community of the Lower Elwha Reservation, Washington Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe Klamath Klamath Indian Tribe of Oregon Konkow Konkow Kootenai Kootenai Kootenai Tribe of Idaho Lassik Lassik Long Island Matinecock Montauk Poospatuck Setauket Luiseno La Jolla Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Luiseno Pala Band of Luiseno Mission Indians
Recommended publications
  • Tribal Relations and Consultation at Txdot

    Tribal Relations and Consultation at Txdot

    Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT Draft Strategic Plan 2016 Archeological Studies Branch, Cultural Resources Management (CRM) Section, Environmental Affairs Division (ENV) Vision for Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT The Texas Department of Transportation is a best-in-class agency that goes above and beyond the spirit of consultation to work collaboratively with federally recognized Native American tribes toward mutually beneficial outcomes during all levels of the transportation process. Mission of the Tribal Relations and Consultation Program: Build relationships and purposefully collaborate with tribal nations in the planning and implementation of TxDOT projects and programs. In working with tribal nations, TxDOT: . Recognizes the inherent sovereign status and reserved rights of tribes; . Practices and promotes cultural sensitivity when working with tribes; . Honors the spirit of various federal requirements and orders to consult with tribes; . Aims to go above and beyond current practices to foster trust and productivity; . Commits to providing meaningful and substantive consultation with tribes on transportation projects; and . Promotes collaborative consultation opportunities during planning and review processes within TXDOT. 2 Draft Tribal Relations and Consultation Strategic Plan 2016 Foreword Texas’ long and rich cultural history is rooted in the indigenous people who once inhabited the land. Tribal nations continue to have an inherent interest in the state’s natural and cultural resources. Today, the federal government recognizes tribes’ inherent sovereign status, a unique relationship that is embodied in the U.S. Constitution, treaties, court decisions, federal statutes and executive orders. As TxDOT builds a safe and reliable transportation system, the agency (on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration) consults with tribes on statewide transportation plans and projects with federal funding.
  • FEMA Flood Boundary

    FEMA Flood Boundary

    MAY 4, 2021 COUSHATTA TRIBE OF LOUISIANA TRIBAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT MAY 2021 Prepared by BEVERLY O'DEA BRIDGEVIEW CONSULTING, LLC 915 N. Laurel Lane Tacoma, WA 98406 (253) 380-5736 Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana 2021 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Prepared for Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana Coushatta Tribal Fire Department P.O. Box 818 Elton, LA 70532 Prepared by Bridgeview Consulting, LLC Beverly O’Dea 915 N. Laurel Lane Tacoma, WA 98406 (253) 380-5736 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... xiii Plan Update ................................................................................................................................................. xiv Initial Response to the DMA for the Coushatta Tribe ........................................................................... xv The 2021 Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana Update—What has changed? ................................................. xv Plan Development Methodology ............................................................................................................... xvii Chapter 1. Introduction to Hazzard Mitigation Planning ............................................... 1-1 1.1 Authority .............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................
  • Robinson V. Salazar 3Rd Amended Complaint

    Robinson V. Salazar 3Rd Amended Complaint

    Case 1:09-cv-01977-BAM Document 211 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 125 1 Evan W. Granowitz (Cal. Bar No. 234031) WOLF GROUP L.A. 2 11400 W Olympic Blvd., Suite 200 Los Angeles, California 90064 3 Telephone: (310) 460-3528 Facsimile: (310) 457-9087 4 Email: [email protected] 5 David R. Mugridge (Cal. Bar No. 123389) 6 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID R. MUGRIDGE 2100 Tulare St., Suite 505 7 Fresno, California 93721-2111 Telephone: (559) 264-2688 8 Facsimile: (559) 264-2683 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Kawaiisu Tribe of Tejon and David Laughing Horse Robinson 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 KAWAIISU TRIBE OF TEJON, and Case No.: 1:09-cv-01977 BAM DAVID LAUGHING HORSE ROBINSON, an 14 individual and Chairman, Kawaiisu Tribe of PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED 15 Tejon, COMPLAINT FOR: 16 Plaintiffs, (1) UNLAWFUL POSSESSION, etc. 17 vs. (2) EQUITABLE 18 KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as ENFORCEMENT OF TREATY 19 Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; TEJON RANCH CORPORATION, a (3) VIOLATION OF NAGPRA; 20 Delaware corporation; TEJON MOUNTAIN VILLAGE, LLC, a Delaware company; COUNTY (4) DEPRIVATION OF PROPERTY 21 OF KERN, CALIFORNIA; TEJON IN VIOLATION OF THE 5th RANCHCORP, a California corporation, and AMENDMENT; 22 DOES 2 through 100, inclusive, (5) BREACH OF FIDUCIARY 23 Defendants. DUTY; 24 (6) NON-STATUTORY REVIEW; and 25 (7) DENIAL OF EQUAL 26 PROTECTION IN VIOLATION OF THE 5th AMENDMENT. 27 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 28 1 PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Case 1:09-cv-01977-BAM Document 211 Filed 03/19/12 Page 2 of 125 1 Plaintiffs KAWAIISU TRIBE OF TEJON and DAVID LAUGHING HORSE ROBINSON 2 allege as follows: 3 I.
  • Indian Country Women Leading in Prescribed Fire

    Indian Country Women Leading in Prescribed Fire

    U.S. Department of the Interior Branch of Wildland Fire Management Bureau of Indian Affairs National Interagency Fire Center Tweet us @BIAFireForestry Boise, ID. 83705 Facebook: @BIAFireForestry https://www.bia.gov/bia/ots/dfwfm/bwfm First-of-its-kind Project for the Southern Border Fuels Management Initiative Underway at Cocopah Indian Reservation July, 2019 Located along the Colorado River 13 miles south of Yuma, Arizona, and 15 miles north of San Luis, Mexico is the Cocopah Reservation. Its unique boundaries border Mexico, Arizona and California. Thriving along the banks is an invasive and dangerous plant called salt cedar. Its roots drink deeply, helping to lower the water table and adding large deposits of salt to the soil. As its roots and branches grow, its prolific and highly flammable branches threaten wetland ecosystems and create a significant fire hazard to neighboring communities when wildfires occur. It is also choking out the native willow, cottonwood, and mesquite trees the Cocopah people use for cultural and spiritual purposes. Firefighters from Fort Apache Agency remove invasive salt cedar brush from the Cocopah Reservation as part of the Southern Border Fuels Management Initiative, 2019. Image courtesy of the Cocopah Indian Tribe. While removing salt cedar is a common management practice along the Reservation’s land mass. In total, 1,359 to help them thrive. When conditions Colorado River, this $563 thousand, acres of invasive and foreign salt cedar cool and become wetter, firefighters four-year treatment plan, funded by the will be treated, preserving the tribe’s will also burn the piles created from the Department of the Interior, Office of valuable economic investments and debris, returning nutrients to the soil.
  • THE UNIVERSITY of ARIZONA PRESS Celebrating 60 Years

    THE UNIVERSITY of ARIZONA PRESS Celebrating 60 Years

    THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA PRESS FALL 2019 Celebrating 60 Years The University of Arizona Press is the premier publisher of academic, regional, and literary works in the state of Arizona. We disseminate ideas and knowledge of lasting value that enrich understanding, inspire curiosity, and enlighten readers. We advance the University of Arizona’s mission by connecting scholarship and creative expression to readers worldwide. CONTENTS AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDIES, 10 ANTHROPOLOGY, 18, 19, 21, 25, 26 ARCHAEOLOGY, 30 ARTS, 2–3 BORDER STUDIES, 9, 18, 19, 20, 29 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 4–5 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 24, 26, 27 ETHNOBIOLOGY, 27 HISTORY, 2–3, 9, 16, 20, 29 INDIGNEOUS STUDIES, 6, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 25, 28 LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29 LATINX STUDIES, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15 LITERATURE, 7 POETRY, 6, 8 SOCIAL JUSTICE, 10, 13, 14, 15, 24 SPACE SCIENCE, 31 WATER, 4–5 RECENTLY PUBLISHED, 32–35 RECENT BEST SELLERS, 36–42 OPEN ARIZONA, 43 SALES INFORMATION, 44 CATALOG DESIGN BY LEIGH MCDONALD COVER PHOTO [FRONT] COMPOSITE BY LEIGH MCDONALD [INSIDE] BY NOSHA/FLICKR PRAISE FOR JAMES S. GRIFFITH TITLE OF THE BOOK SUBTITLE OF THE BOOK GOES HERE “Griffith recognizes the interdependence that has grown between the Tucsonese culture AUTHORand its folk NAME arts traditions.” —High Country News Keynote keynote keynote keynote keynote keynote keynote keynote Keynote keynote keynote keynote “Like a friend or relative who is eager to introduce visitors to the sights and sounds of his hometown, Griffith leads readers on a whirlwind tour celebrating Mexicano arts and crafts.” Repudant.
  • TREATY 8: a British Columbian Anomaly

    TREATY 8: a British Columbian Anomaly

    TREATY 8: A British Columbian Anomaly ARTHUR J. RAY N THE ANNALS OF NATIVE BRITISH COLUMBIA, 1999 undoubtedly will be remembered as the year when, in a swirl of controversy, Ithe provincial legislature passed the Nisga'a Agreement. The media promptly heralded the agreement as the province's first modern Indian treaty. Unmentioned, because it has been largely forgotten, was the fact that the last major "pre-modern" agreement affecting British Columbia -Treaty 8 - had been signed 100 years earlier. This treaty encompasses a sprawling 160,900-square-kilometre area of northeastern British Columbia (Map 1), which is a territory that is nearly twenty times larger than that covered by the Nisga'a Agreement. In addition, Treaty 8 includes the adjoining portions of Alberta and the Northwest Territories. Treaty 8 was negotiated at a time when British Columbia vehemently denied the existence of Aboriginal title or self-governing rights. It therefore raises two central questions. First, why, in 1899, was it ne­ cessary to bring northeastern British Columbia under treaty? Second, given the contemporary Indian policies of the provincial government, how was it possible to do so? The latter question raises two other related issues, both of which resurfaced during negotiations for the modern Nisga'a Agreement. The first concerned how the two levels of government would share the costs of making a treaty. (I will show that attempts to avoid straining federal-provincial relations over this issue in 1899 created troublesome ambiguities in Treaty 8.) The second concerned how much BC territory had to be included within the treaty area.
  • Cowlitz Indian Tribe YOOYOOLAH!

    Cowlitz Indian Tribe YOOYOOLAH!

    Cowlitz Indian Tribe Cowlitz Indian Tribe S p r I n g 2 0 1 2 N e w s l e t t e r S p r I n g 2 0 1 2 N e w s l e t t e r YOOYOOLAH!YOOYOOLAH! YOOYOOLAH!YOOYOOLAH! THE CHAIRMAN’S CORNER THE CHAIRMAN’S CORNER It took the U.S. government decades to acknowledge the Cowlitz people It took the U.S. government decades to acknowledge the Cowlitz people as an Indian Tribe. Recognition brought the Cowlitz Tribe minimal fed- as an Indian Tribe. Recognition brought the Cowlitz Tribe minimal fed- eral dollars to operate a sovereign tribal government and offer a range of eral dollars to operate a sovereign tribal government and offer a range of social, housing, and cultural services and to receive health care from the social, housing, and cultural services and to receive health care from the Indian Health Services. Our leaders have accomplished a lot with those Indian Health Services. Our leaders have accomplished a lot with those funds already. funds already. With the announcement in 2002 of our recognition, Chairman John Barnett said, "After all these With the announcement in 2002 of our recognition, Chairman John Barnett said, "After all these years, justice has finally been done. We're not extinct. They are finally recognizing that we've al- years, justice has finally been done. We're not extinct. They are finally recognizing that we've al- ways been here and have always been a historic tribe." After the unsuccessful appeal by the ways been here and have always been a historic tribe." After the unsuccessful appeal by the Quinault Indian Nation, the Interior Department affirmed the earlier decision that acknowl- Quinault Indian Nation, the Interior Department affirmed the earlier decision that acknowl- edged the Cowlitz as a tribe.
  • Kawaiisu Basketry

    Kawaiisu Basketry

    Kawaiisu Basketry MAURICE L. ZIGMOND HERE are a number of fine basket Adam Steiner (died 1916), assembled at least 1 makers in Kern County, Califomia," 500 baskets from the West, and primarily from wrote George Wharton James (1903:247), "No Cahfornia, but labelled all those from Kern attempt, as far as I know, has yet been made to County simply "Kem County." They may weU study these people to get at definite knowledge have originated among the Yokuts, Tubatula­ as to their tribal relationships. The baskets bal, Kitanemuk, or Kawaiisu. Possibly the they make are of the Yokut type, and I doubt most complete collection of Kawahsu ware is whether there is any real difference in their to be found in the Lowie Museum of Anthro­ manufacture, materials or designs." The hobby pology at the University of Califomia, Berke­ of basket collecting had reached its heyday ley. Here the specimens are duly labelled and during the decades around the turn of the numbered. Edwin L. McLeod (died 1908) was century. The hobbyists were scattered over the responsible for acquiring this collection. country, and there were dealers who issued McLeod was eclectic in his tastes and, unhke catalogues advertising their wares. A Basket Steiner, did not hmit his acquisitions to items Fraternity was organized by George Wharton having esthetic appeal. James (1903:247) James who, for a one dollar annual fee, sent observed: out quarterly bulletins.^ Undoubtedly the best collection of Kern While some Indian tribes were widely County baskets now in existence is that of known for their distinctive basketry, the deal­ Mr.
  • Mattole River Cumulative Effects

    Mattole River Cumulative Effects

    Mattole River Watershed Analysis Cumulative Watershed Effects Public Review Draft September 2011 Cumulative Watershed Effects TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS ........................................................................................................ vi LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF MAPS ........................................................................................................................ viii LIST OF ATTACHMENTS .......................................................................................................... x LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... xi 1.0 ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 OVERVIEW OF WATERSHED ANALYSIS PROCESS .................................................................. 6 2.2 PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION OF REPORT .......................................................................
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview

    Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
  • The Camper's Guide to Alberta Parks

    The Camper's Guide to Alberta Parks

    Discover Value Protect Enjoy The Camper’s Guide to Alberta Parks Front Photo: Lesser Slave Lake Provincial Park Back Photo: Aspen Beach Provincial Park Printed 2016 ISBN: 978–1–4601–2459–8 Welcome to the Camper’s Guide to Alberta’s Provincial Campgrounds Explore Alberta Provincial Parks and Recreation Areas Legend In this Guide we have included almost 200 automobile accessible campgrounds located Whether you like mountain biking, bird watching, sailing, relaxing on the beach or sitting in Alberta’s provincial parks and recreation areas. Many more details about these around the campfire, Alberta Parks have a variety of facilities and an infinite supply of Provincial Park campgrounds, as well as group camping, comfort camping and backcountry camping, memory making moments for you. It’s your choice – sweeping mountain vistas, clear Provincial Recreation Area can be found at albertaparks.ca. northern lakes, sunny prairie grasslands, cool shady parklands or swift rivers flowing through the boreal forest. Try a park you haven’t visited yet, or spend a week exploring Activities Amenities Our Vision: Alberta’s parks inspire people to discover, value, protect and enjoy the several parks in a region you’ve been wanting to learn about. Baseball Amphitheatre natural world and the benefits it provides for current and future generations. Beach Boat Launch Good Camping Neighbours Since the 1930s visitors have enjoyed Alberta’s provincial parks for picnicking, beach Camping Boat Rental and water fun, hiking, skiing and many other outdoor activities. Alberta Parks has 476 Part of the camping experience can be meeting new folks in your camping loop.
  • Afro-Mexicans and the Struggle for Recognition Kimberly Medina

    Afro-Mexicans and the Struggle for Recognition Kimberly Medina

    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Senior Theses Honors College 5-2017 Afro-Mexicans and the Struggle for Recognition Kimberly Medina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/senior_theses Part of the Ethnic Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Medina, Kimberly, "Afro-Mexicans and the Struggle for Recognition" (2017). Senior Theses. 212. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/senior_theses/212 This Thesis is brought to you by the Honors College at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AFRO-MEXICANS AND THE STRUGGLE FOR RECOGNITION By Kimberly Medina Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation with Honors from the South Carolina Honors College May 2017 Approved: Kimberly Simmons Director of Thesis Terrance Weik Second Reader Steve Lynn, Dean For South Carolina Honors College Table of Contents Summary........................................................................................................................................................3 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................5 Afro-MeXicans..............................................................................................................................................7 Who are Afro-MeXicans? ................................................................................................................7