DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 184 Program Approved Tribes 7152021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SECTION 184 PROGRAM APPROVED TRIBES 8/30/2021 Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Reservation Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians aka Barona Band of Mission Indians Bay Mills Indian Community Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Big Lagoon Rancheria Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians of California Bishop Paiute Tribe Blackfeet Tribe Blue Lake Rancheria Burns Paiute Tribe Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Cahuilla Band of Indians Catawba Indian Nation aka Catawba Tribe of South Carolina Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Cherokee Nation Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Chickasaw Nation Chippewa Cree Indians of the Rocky Boy's Reservation Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Citizen Potawatomi Nation Cocopah Tribe of Arizona Coeur d'Alene Tribe Coharie Tribe Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Colorado River Indian Tribes Comanche Nation Confederated Tribes of Siletz Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Confederated Tribes of the Colville Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Coquille Indian Tribe Cowlitz Indian Tribe Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Crow Tribe of Montana Delaware Nation Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians Duckwater Shoshone Tribe Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Page 1 of 5 SECTION 184 PROGRAM APPROVED TRIBES 8/30/2021 Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Eastern Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River Reservation Ely Shoshone Tribe of Nevada Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa aka Fond du Lac Band of Minnesota Chippewa Forest County Potawatomi Community Fort Belknap Indian Commuity aka Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Tribes of Fort Belknap Fort McDowell Yavapai Tribe Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of Arizona, California and Nevada Gila River Indian Community Grand Portage Band of Minnesota Chippewa Grand Ronde Confederated Tribes Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Guidiville Rancheria of California Haliwa Saponi Indian Tribe Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin Hoh Indian Tribe Hoopa Valley Tribe Hopi Tribe of Arizona Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Hualapai Indian Tribe Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma Isleta del Sur Pueblo aka Tigua Pueblo Jicarilla Apache Nation Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians Kalispel Indian Community Kashia Band of Pomo Indians of the Stewarts Point Rancheria Kaw Nation Kewa Pueblo formerly known as Pueblo of Santa Domingo Keweenaw Bay Indian Community Kialegee Tribal Town Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas Kiowa Indian Tribe of Oklahoma Klamath Tribes Kootenai Tribe of Idaho La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Lac du Flambeaux Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe aka Leech Lake Band of Minnesota Chippewa Little River Band of Ottowa Indians Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odowa Indians Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Lower Elwha Tribal Community Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina Lummi Tribe Makah Tribe Page 2 of 5 SECTION 184 PROGRAM APPROVED TRIBES 8/30/2021 Manchester Band of Pomo Indians of the Manchester Rancheria Manzanita Band of Diegueno Mission Indians aka Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation Mashantucket Pequot Indian Tribe Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin Mescalero Apache Tribe Metlakatla Indian Community Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Mille Lacs Band of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe Minnesota Chippewa Tribe-Bois Forte Band Mississippee Band of Choctaw Indians Mooretown Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Morongo Band of Mission Indians MOWA Band of Choctaw Indians Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Muscogee (Creek) Nation Narragansett Indian Tribe Navajo Nation Nez Perce Tribe Nisqually Indian Tribe Nooksack Indian Tribe Northern Arapaho aka Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation Northern Cheyenne Tribe Northwestern Band of Shoshoni Indians Oglala Sioux Tribe Ohkay Owingeh formerly known as Pueblo of San Juan Omaha Tribe of Nebraska Oneida Nation Osage Nation Oteo-Missouria Tribe of Indians Paiute-Shoshone Tribe of the Fallon Reservation and Colony Pala Band of Mission Indians Pauma Bank of Luiseno Mission Indians Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona Passamaquoddy Tribe of Indian Township Passamaquoddy Tribe of Pleasant Point Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma Penobscot Nation Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Poarch Band of Creeks aka Poarch Band of Creek Indians Pokagaon Band of Pottawatomi Indians Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Ponca Tribe of Nebraska aka Northern Ponca Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Pueblo of Acoma Pueblo of Cochiti Page 3 of 5 SECTION 184 PROGRAM APPROVED TRIBES 8/30/2021 Pueblo of Isleta Pueblo of Jemez Pueblo of Laguna Pueblo of Nambe Pueblo of Pojoaque Pueblo of San Felipe Pueblo of San Ildefonso Pueblo of Sandia Pueblo of Santa Ana Pueblo of Santa Clara Pueblo of Taos* Pueblo of Zia Pueblo of Tesuque Puyallup Tribe Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Quapaw Nation Quinault Indian Nation Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Redwood Valley or Little River Band of Pomo Indians of the Redwood Valley Rancheria Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Robinson Rancheria Rosebud Sioux Saboba Band of Luiseno Indians Sac & Fox Nation of Oklahoma Sac & Fox Nation Tribe of Mississippi in Iowa Sac and Fox Nation Sac and Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe Salish and Kootenai Tribe Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Samish Indian Nation San Carlos Apache Tribe Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians Santa Ysabel Band of Diegueno Mission Indians Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians Seminole Nation of Oklahoma Seminole Tribe of Florida Seneca Nation of Indians Sherwood Valley Rancheria Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe Shoshone Bannock Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate formerly Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe Skokomish Indian Tribe Snoqualmie Indian Tribe Page 4 of 5 SECTION 184 PROGRAM APPROVED TRIBES 8/30/2021 Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Sokaogan Chippewa Community Southern Ute Indian Tribe Spirit Lake Tribe Spokane Tribe Squaxin Island Tribe St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Stillaguamish Tribe Stockbridge-Munsee Community aka Mohican Nation Stockbridge-Munsee Band Suquamish Indian Tribe Susanville Indian Rancheria Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada The Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Michigan Three Afiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation aka Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation Tohono O'odham Nation Tolowa Dee-ni' Nation formerly Smith River Rancheria Tulalip Tribes of Washington Tule River Indian Tribe of California Tunica Buloxi Indian Tribe Tuolumne Band of Me-Wak Indians of the Tuolumne Rancheria Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians of North Dakota United Auburn Indian Community Upper Skagit Indian Tribe Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Res Waccamaw Siouan Tribe Wampanoag Tribe of Gayhead (Aquinnah) Washoe Tribes of Nevada and California White Earth Band of Minnesota Chippewa Tribe White Mountain Apache Tribe Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska Witchita and Affiliated Tribes Yakama Nation Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota Yarrington Paiute Tribe Yavapai -Prescott Indian Tribe Yavapai-Apache Nation Yurok Tribe Zuni Tribe aka Zuni Pueblo Page 5 of 5.
Recommended publications
  • Family Type and Incidence

    Family Type and Incidence

    EVER TOWARDS THE SETTING SUN THEY PUSH US: AMERICAN INDIAN IDENTITY IN THE WRITINGS OF MARY ALICIA OWEN _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by GREG OLSON Dr. Susan Flader, Thesis Supervisor Dr. Jeffrey Pasley, Thesis Supervisor JULY 2009 The undersigned, approved by the Dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled EVER TOWARDS THE SETTING SUN THEY PUSH US: AMERICAN INDIAN IDENTITY IN THE WRITINGS OF MARY ALICIA OWEN Presented by Greg Olson A candidate for the degree of Master of Arts And hereby certify that in their opinion it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Susan Flader Professor Jeffery Pasley Professor Joanna Hearne To Rebecca Schroeder, who introduced me to the work of Mary Alicia Owen. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my thesis committee for their support, suggestions, and dedication. Their patience and guidance were critical in helping me complete this project. This thesis began as a research paper, which I wrote for Dr. Robert Collins in a history seminar at the University of Missouri-Columbia. Thanks to Dr. Collins and to my fellow students for their ideas and suggestions. I would also like to thank Dr. R. Lee Lyman, chair of the Department of Anthropology at the University of Missouri-Columbia, for taking the time to comment on an early version of this thesis. Thanks also to Bill Stolz at the Western Historical Manuscripts Collection- Columbia, to Kate Kiel and Linda Endersby at the Missouri State Museum, and to the staff of the special collections department of the Missouri Western State University Library for their help in steering me to many of the primary sources used in this project.
  • FY 2020 Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation Combined Award List Page 1 of 8 Nunakauyarmiut Tribe $500,950 1

    FY 2020 Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation Combined Award List Page 1 of 8 Nunakauyarmiut Tribe $500,950 1

    Department of Justice Fiscal Year 2020 Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation Combined Award List ALASKA AMOUNT: $13,596,823 Alaska Native Justice Center $450,000 6. Children’s Justice Act Partnerships for Indian Communities (OVC) $450,000 Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association, Inc. $880,702 5. Violence Against Women Tribal Governments Program (OVW) $880,702 Asa'carsarmiut Tribal Council $387,415 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $387,415 Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska $1,208,431 4. Tribal Justice System Infrastructure Program (BJA) $1,208,431 Fairbanks Native Association $416,030 9. Tribal Youth Program (OJJDP) $416,030 Kawerak, Inc. $1,229,928 3. Justice Systems and Alcohol and Substance Abuse (BJA) $813,898 9. Tribal Youth Program (OJJDP) $416,030 Koyukuk Native Village $437,628 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $437,628 Maniilaq Association $699,015 5. Violence Against Women Tribal Governments Program (OVW) $699,015 Manokotak Village Council $362,390 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $362,390 Native Village of Fort Yukon $390,820 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $390,820 Native Village of Kwinhagak $306,123 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $306,123 Native Village of Napakiak $453,859 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $453,859 Native Village of Nunapitchuk $465,365 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $465,365 Native Village of Port Graham $272,618 5. Violence Against Women Tribal Governments Program (OVW) $272,618 Native Village of Port Heiden $385,000 5. Violence Against Women Tribal Governments Program (OVW) $385,000 Native Village of Shageluk $413,426 1.
  • California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A

    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A

    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Written and Designed by Nicole Mullen Contributors: Ira Jacknis, Barbara Takiguchi, and Liberty Winn. Sources Consulted The former exhibition: Food in California Indian Culture at the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Ortiz, Beverly, as told by Julia Parker. It Will Live Forever. Heyday Books, Berkeley, CA 1991. Jacknis, Ira. Food in California Indian Culture. Hearst Museum Publications, Berkeley, CA, 2004. Copyright © 2003. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology and the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. All Rights Reserved. PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Table of Contents 1. Glossary 2. Topics of Discussion for Lessons 3. Map of California Cultural Areas 4. General Overview of California Indians 5. Plants and Plant Processing 6. Animals and Hunting 7. Food from the Sea and Fishing 8. Insects 9. Beverages 10. Salt 11. Drying Foods 12. Earth Ovens 13. Serving Utensils 14. Food Storage 15. Feasts 16. Children 17. California Indian Myths 18. Review Questions and Activities PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Glossary basin an open, shallow, usually round container used for holding liquids carbohydrate Carbohydrates are found in foods like pasta, cereals, breads, rice and potatoes, and serve as a major energy source in the diet. Central Valley The Central Valley lies between the Coast Mountain Ranges and the Sierra Nevada Mountain Ranges. It has two major river systems, the Sacramento and the San Joaquin. Much of it is flat, and looks like a broad, open plain. It forms the largest and most important farming area in California and produces a great variety of crops.
  • Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance

    Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance

    [email protected] Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance In October 2011, the Bishop Tribal Council held the 1st of a series of Pub- lic Hearings regarding proposed changes in the enrollment ordinance. The pro- posed changes would be to amend the ordinance to add new criteria such as: blood quantum, a residency clause, and having a contin- ual generational enrollment of descendents. Question: How did we arrive at Each meeting scheduled has discussed a “proposing” a blood quantum different topic. The most recent meeting on Janu- or enrollment changes? ary 25, 2012, the Bishop Tribal Council had invited On December 17, 2009 a tribal ENROLLMENT survey was taken asking if COMMITTEE representatives from the Bureau of Indian Affairs Tribal members would like to in Sacramento, California to give a presentation include a blood quantum in the LAURINE NAPOLES and answer any questions regarding blood quan- tum and when it is used or if it is still used. The current Tribal Enrollment Ordi- RUTH CHAVEZ nance. (134 people responded) meeting with the Bureau of Indian Affairs was in- PATTY MANRIQUEZ This lead to proposed changes formative for both the Enrollment Committee and and public hearings. GERALD HOWARD the community. ROBIN HOWARD The importance of these Public Hearings is for the community to become informed and be involved in the decision making process. Hopefully, the Enrollment Committee and Department can answer some ENROLLMENT DEPARTMENT of the misconceptions that have been mentioned during the Public Hearings. (i.e., GERTRUDE BROWN, We have members coming out of the “wood works”.
  • Nps-Waso-Nagpra-23208; Ppwocradn0-Pcu00rp14.R50000]

    Nps-Waso-Nagpra-23208; Ppwocradn0-Pcu00rp14.R50000]

    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/02/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-11453, and on FDsys.gov 4312-52 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS-WASO-NAGPRA-23208; PPWOCRADN0-PCU00RP14.R50000] Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Ocmulgee National Monument, Macon, GA AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Ocmulgee National Monument, in consultation with the appropriate Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations, has determined that the cultural items listed in this notice meet the definition of unassociated funerary objects. Lineal descendants or representatives of any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to claim these cultural items should submit a written request to Ocmulgee National Monument. If no additional claimants come forward, transfer of control of the cultural items to the lineal descendants, Indian tribes, or Native Hawaiian organizations stated in this notice may proceed. DATES: Lineal descendants or representatives of any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to claim these cultural items should submit a written request with information in support of the claim to Ocmulgee National Monument at the address in this notice by [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Jim David, Superintendent, Ocmulgee National Monument, 1207 Emery Highway, Macon, GA 31217, telephone (478) 752-8257, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C.
  • Agenda Item – Staff Report

    Agenda Item – Staff Report

    AGENDA ITEM – STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND COMMISSIONERS FROM: JEFFREY O’NEAL, AICP, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: APPLICATION NO. 20-23, THE VALLEY AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS, LLC COMMERCIAL CANNABIS PROJECT DATE: DECEMBER 29, 2020 ISSUE In the matter of Application No. 20-23, the Valley Agricultural Holdings LLC project, shall the Planning Commission: 1. Make a determination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, make a determination of General Plan consistency for the disposal of real property, and approve a conditional use permit; and 2. Make recommendations to the City Council regarding a general plan amendment, rezone, and development agreement? BACKGROUND The State of California’s Medical and Adult Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) is the primary statute that regulates personal, medicinal, and commercial cannabis activity in the state. In addition to MAUCRSA, Chapters 8.37 (Commercial Cannabis Businesses) and 17.99 (Commercial Cannabis Overly District) of the Mendota Municipal Code (MMC) provide regulations applicable to non-personal cannabis activities at the local level. Pursuant to these local regulations, an applicant wishing to undertake commercial cannabis activities must meet certain location criteria, receive approval of a conditional use permit, and enter into a development agreement with the City. Dating to early 2019, the City has been in discussions with various entities regarding development of a commercial cannabis facility on a portion of a City-owned parcel (APN 013-030-68ST) adjacent to the City’s wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). In October 2019, the City entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Valley Agricultural Holdings, LLC. On October 13, 2020 the Planning Department received an application from Valley Agricultural Holdings, LLC requesting a variety of entitlements and actions to facilitate the construction and operation of a commercial cannabis facility as discussed.
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries

    Tribal and House District Boundaries

    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
  • The Geography and Dialects of the Miwok Indians

    The Geography and Dialects of the Miwok Indians

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS IN AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY VOL. 6 NO. 2 THE GEOGRAPHY AND DIALECTS OF THE MIWOK INDIANS. BY S. A. BARRETT. CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction.--...--.................-----------------------------------333 Territorial Boundaries ------------------.....--------------------------------344 Dialects ...................................... ..-352 Dialectic Relations ..........-..................................356 Lexical ...6.................. 356 Phonetic ...........3.....5....8......................... 358 Alphabet ...................................--.------------------------------------------------------359 Vocabularies ........3......6....................2..................... 362 Footnotes to Vocabularies .3.6...........................8..................... 368 INTRODUCTION. Of the many linguistic families in California most are con- fined to single areas, but the large Moquelumnan or Miwok family is one of the few exceptions, in that the people speaking its various dialects occupy three distinct areas. These three areas, while actually quite near together, are at considerable distances from one another as compared with the areas occupied by any of the other linguistic families that are separated. The northern of the three Miwok areas, which may for con- venience be called the Northern Coast or Lake area, is situated in the southern extremity of Lake county and just touches, at its northern boundary, the southernmost end of Clear lake. This 334 University of California Publications in Am. Arch.
  • California Gambling Control Commission Revenue Sharing Trust Fund Recipients March 4, 2009

    California Gambling Control Commission Revenue Sharing Trust Fund Recipients March 4, 2009

    CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION REVENUE SHARING TRUST FUND RECIPIENTS MARCH 4, 2009 TRIBE CASINO LOCATION 1 Alturas Indian Rancheria Desert Rose Casino Alturas 2 Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria Bear River Casino Loleta 3 Benton Paiute Reservation N/A Benton 4 Big Lagoon Rancheria N/A Trinidad 5 Big Pine Reservation N/A Big Pine 6 Big Sandy Rancheria Mono Wind Casino Auberry Konocti Vista 7 Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians Lakeport Casino Paiute Palace 8 Bishop Paiute Tribe Bishop Casino 9 Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony N/A Bridgeport 10 Buena Vista Rancheria N/A Ione 11 Cahto Indian Tribe of Laytonville Rancheria Red Fox Casino Laytonville Cahuilla Creek 12 Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians Anza Casino 13 California Valley Miwok Tribe N/A Stockton 14 Cedarville Rancheria N/A Alturas Havasu Landing 15 Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Havasu Lake Resort and Casino Cher-Ae-Heights 16 Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community Trinidad Casino Chicken Ranch 17 Chicken Ranch Rancheria Jamestown Bingo and Casino 18 Cloverdale Rancheria N/A Cloverdale 19 Cold Springs Rancheria N/A Tollhouse CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION REVENUE SHARING TRUST FUND RECIPIENTS MARCH 4, 2009 TRIBE CASINO LOCATION 20 Colorado River Indian Tribes N/A Parker, AZ 1 21 Cortina Rancheria N/A Williams Coyote Valley 22 Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians Redwood Valley Shodakai Casino 23 Death Valley Timba-Sha Shoshone Tribe N/A Death Valley 24 Elem Indian Colony N/A Clearlake Oaks 25 Elk Valley Rancheria Elk Valley Casino Crescent City 26 Enterprise Rancheria N/A Oroville
  • Plants Used in Basketry by the California Indians

    Plants Used in Basketry by the California Indians

    PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS BY RUTH EARL MERRILL PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS RUTH EARL MERRILL INTRODUCTION In undertaking, as a study in economic botany, a tabulation of all the plants used by the California Indians, I found it advisable to limit myself, for the time being, to a particular form of use of plants. Basketry was chosen on account of the availability of material in the University's Anthropological Museum. Appreciation is due the mem- bers of the departments of Botany and Anthropology for criticism and suggestions, especially to Drs. H. M. Hall and A. L. Kroeber, under whose direction the study was carried out; to Miss Harriet A. Walker of the University Herbarium, and Mr. E. W. Gifford, Asso- ciate Curator of the Museum of Anthropology, without whose interest and cooperation the identification of baskets and basketry materials would have been impossible; and to Dr. H. I. Priestley, of the Ban- croft Library, whose translation of Pedro Fages' Voyages greatly facilitated literary research. Purpose of the sttudy.-There is perhaps no phase of American Indian culture which is better known, at least outside strictly anthro- pological circles, than basketry. Indian baskets are not only concrete, durable, and easily handled, but also beautiful, and may serve a variety of purposes beyond mere ornament in the civilized household. Hence they are to be found in. our homes as well as our museums, and much has been written about the art from both the scientific and the popular standpoints. To these statements, California, where American basketry.
  • Distribution List

    Distribution List

    table of contents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Distribution List Distribution List The lists that follow show tribes, federal, state, and local government agencies, elected officials, and libraries who were on the mailing list to receive the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision as of December 11, 2000. In November 2000 the 15,000 people and organizations on the Sierra Nevada Framework Project mailing list were sent a return postcard by which they could request a copy of the Final EIS. As of December 11, 2000 the Forest Service had received approximately 1300 requests. FEIS Volume 1, Distribution List Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Distribution List California and Nevada Tribes Rancheria (Tribe) Local Office Name Last Name First Name Title Big Sandy Rancheria Baty Loren Chairman BIA Office Western Nevada Field Office Hunter Robert L Chairman Cedarville Rancheria Northern California Agency Lash Virginia Chairperson Choinumni Choinumni Tribe Alec Stanley Chairman Eel River Blue Lake Rancheria Brundin Claudia Chairperson Maidu Chico Rancheria Ward Arlene Chairperson Maidu Enterprise Rancheria Angle Harvey Chairman Maidu Greenville Rancheria Timmons Angela Chairman Maidu Maidu Nation Lecompte Clara Chairperson Maidu Mooretown Rancheria Pursia Shirley Chairperson Me-Wuk Tuolumne Me-Wuk Rancheria Kevin Day Sonny Chairman Miwok Buena Vista Rancheria Potts Donna Marie Spokesperson Miwok Calaveras Band of Miwok Indians Jeff Virginia Spokesperson Miwok Ione Band of Miwok
  • Waterman 1934: 3-4

    Waterman 1934: 3-4

    a state society (i.e., Euro-American) in the historic past, manu- factured either by direct political or indirect economic pressures (1975). Thus, the concept "triblet" may, indeed, describe the situation in the entire Country. To reiterate, in California, triblets were organized around a central community for a number of nearby sub-ordinate settlements. However, in northwestern California, political organization was characterized by extreme fractionalism; the triblet was a loosely connected set of separate settlements, and people clustered in a town or village which did not have the sense of cohesiveness and continuity of other areas. Individualism, or atomism, was the rule for the Tolowa, Hupa, Chil- ula, Wiyot, Karok, and Yurok. Within certain class boundaries, north- western California was characterized by a man struggling for himself and his immediate family--competition rather than cooperation was the ideal (Bean 1974). Factionalism of the typical triblet pattern was reflected in other aspects of northwestern California culture. For instance in regard to marriage practices: ... apart from the generic tendency to seek wives 'downstream,' the Tolowa and Karok sought wives not only in the immediately adjacent Yurok dis- tricts, but also to some degree in farther ones; and the Yurok reciprocated correspondingly. The Hupa and Chilula, on the contrary, exchanged wives and husbands with the Yurok almost exclu- sively in the Weitspus district. This differ- ence seems to be connected with the Tolowa and Karok being on the upstream-downstream line, as the Yurok construe the world, but the Hupa and Chilula living in a 'side-stream' or 'up-hill' direction. Intercourse and relations evidently flowed most freely along the main thoroughfare of the Klamath and its coastwise 'continuation' (Waterman 1934: 3-4).