January 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nvironmental Management and Performance
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE LAND AND WATERBORNE TRANSPORT Hong Kong is one of the most densely populated cities in the world. A safe, efficient, reliable and environment friendly transport system is important to the sustainable development of the city. On environmental management, we will continue to press ahead with the following initiatives - priority for efficient and environment friendly transport modes; reduction in traffic congestion and better inter-modal co-ordination; greater emphasis on pedestrian facilities; and application of Information Technology (IT) to transport management. Priority for Efficient and Environment Friendly Transport Modes Railways are environment friendly, safe and efficient mass carriers in Hong Kong, carrying about 40% of our public transport passengers. At present, the total length of our railways under operation is about 219 km. We are taking forward the following five railway projects in full swing - West Island Line; South Island Line (East); Kwun Tong Line Extension; Shatin to Central Link; and Hong Kong section of the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link. 7 Upon completion of these railway passenger lines by 2020, the total length of railways in operation in Hong Kong will be increased to about 280 km. We launched the consultancy study on the Review and Update of the Railway Development Strategy 2000 in March 2011 to further our policy for better use of railways as the backbone of the passenger transport system. Development of rail transport will significantly speed up passenger flow, alleviate road traffic congestion and reduce vehicle-induced air pollution. The study is expected to be completed in 2013. The Government will continue with its efforts to enhance the co-ordination between railway and other public transport modes to avoid unnecessary duplication of public transport resources and alleviate traffic congestion. -
Signalling on the High-Speed Railway Amsterdam–Antwerp
Computers in Railways XI 243 Towards interoperability on Northwest European railway corridors: signalling on the high-speed railway Amsterdam–Antwerp J. H. Baggen, J. M. Vleugel & J. A. A. M. Stoop Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands Abstract The high-speed railway Amsterdam (The Netherlands)–Antwerp (Belgium) is nearly completed. As part of a TEN-T priority project it will connect to major metropolitan areas in Northwest Europe. In many (European) countries, high-speed railways have been built. So, at first sight, the development of this particular high-speed railway should be relatively straightforward. But the situation seems to be more complicated. To run international services full interoperability is required. However, there turned out to be compatibility problems that are mainly caused by the way decision making has taken place, in particular with respect to the choice and implementation of ERTMS, the new European railway signalling system. In this paper major technical and institutional choices, as well as the choice of system borders that have all been made by decision makers involved in the development of the high-speed railway Amsterdam–Antwerp, will be analyzed. This will make it possible to draw some lessons that might be used for future railway projects in Europe and other parts of the world. Keywords: high-speed railway, interoperability, signalling, metropolitan areas. 1 Introduction Two major new railway projects were initiated in the past decade in The Netherlands, the Betuweroute dedicated freight railway between Rotterdam seaport and the Dutch-German border and the high-speed railway between Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and the Dutch-Belgian border to Antwerp (Belgium). -
Twinning Conference Presentation – 12Th December 2017
Welcome to the conference Network rail 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 1 Agenda 10:00 - 10:15 The value of twinning (Keir Fitch, European Commission) 10:15 – 10:30 Welcome (Lisbeth Fromling, Network Rail) 10:30 – 11:30 Group 1 presentation (Network Rail, CFR, Infrabel and HZ) 11:30 – 11:50 Break 11:50 – 12:40 Group 2 presentation (ProRail, Irish Rail and OBB) 12:40 – 13:15 Lunch 13:15 – 14:05 Group 3 presentation (Trafikverket, Adif and PLK) 14:05 – 14:35 Group 4 presentation (RFI and SNCF Reseau) 14:35 – 14:55 Learning activity based on safety culture evaluation 14:55 – 15:15 Opportunity for questions 15:15 – 15:30 Summary of event and closure 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 2 Welcome from Keir Fitch Head of Unit C4 "Rail Safety & Interoperability”, European Commission 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 3 Welcome from Lisbeth Fromling Chief Health, Safety, Quality and Environment Officer, Network Rail 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 4 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning Programme Welcome to the final conference • Thank you for joining us • Today is a good day! • Purely pro-active project • All information is good • Lots to share PRIME Safety Culture Sub-Group / 5 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning Programme Co-ordinator Participant PRIME Safety Culture Sub-Group / 6 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture collaboration PRIME Safety Culture Sub-Group / 7 Group 1 Presentations Network Rail, CFR, Infrabel and HZ 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 8 Group 1 Presentations Network Rail 10-Apr-18 Safety -
TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Formats
STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE formats. For alternate format information, contact the Forms Management Unit TR0003 (REV 10/98) at (916) 445-1233, TTY 711, or write to Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION NUMBER 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER CA-17-2969 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE A Comparative Analysis of High Speed Rail Station Development into Destination and/or Multi-use Facilities: The Case of San Jose Diridon February 2017 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris Ph.D. / Deike Peters, Ph.D. MTI Report 12-75 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NUMBER Mineta Transportation Institute College of Business 3762 San José State University 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER San José, CA 95192-0219 65A0499 12. SPONSORING AGENCY AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED California Department of Transportation Final Report Division of Research, Innovation and Systems Information MS-42, PO Box 942873 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 16. ABSTRACT As a burgeoning literature on high-speed rail development indicates, good station-area planning is a very important prerequisite for the eventual successful operation of a high-speed rail station; it can also trigger opportunities for economic development in the station area and the station-city. At the same time, “on the ground” experiences from international examples of high-speed rail stations can provide valuable lessons for the California high-speed rail system in general, and the San Jose Diridon station in particular. -
Overview of Priority Rules in Operation
RNE_OverviewOfthePriorityRulesInOperation_v10 Overview of priority rules in operation Delivered by RNE Operation & After- sales WG – March 19th 2012 Approved by RNE General Assembly – May 9th 2012 Updated 04th December 2020 RailNetEurope Oelzeltgasse 3/8 AT-1030 Vienna Phone: +43 1 907 62 72 00 Fax: +43 1 907 62 72 90 [email protected] www.rne.eu RNE_OverviewOfthePriorityRulesInOperation_v10 Content 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Aim and content of the Overview ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Updates and new features ................................................................................................................. 5 2 Overview of the priority rules in operation ................................................................................................. 6 2.1 General considerations ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 IM/Network Dossiers - Content ........................................................................................................ 10 2.3 Single IM/Network Dossier .............................................................................................................. 10 2.3.1 ADIF ........................................................................................................................................ -
DB Netz AG Network Statement 2016 Valid from 14 April 2015 DB Netz
DB Netz AG Network Statement 2016 valid from 14 April 2015 DB Netz AG Headquarters I.NMN Version control Date Modification 12.12.2014 Amendment of Network Statement 2015 as at 12 December 2014 (Publication of the Network Statement 2016) Inclusion of detailed information in sections 1.9 ff and 4.2.5 ff due to 14.10.2015 commissioning of rail freight corridors Sandinavian-Mediterranean and North Sea-Balitc. Addition of connection to Port of Hamburg (Hohe Schaar) in section 13.12.2015 3.3.2.5 Printed by DB Netz AG Editors Principles of Network Access/Regulation (I.NMN) Theodor-Heuss-Allee 7 60486 Frankfurt am Main Picture credits Front page photo: Bildschön, Silvia Bunke Copyright: Deutsche Bahn AG Contents Version control 3 List of Annexes 7 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 9 1.1 Introduction 9 1.2 Purpose 9 1.3 Legal basis 9 1.4 Legal framework of the Network Statement 9 1.5 Structure of the Network Statement 10 1.6 Term of and amendments to the Network Statement 10 1.7 Publication and opportunity to respond 11 1.8 Contacts at DB Netz AG 11 1.9 Rail freight corridors 12 1.10 RNE and international cooperation between DB Netz AG and other RIUs 14 1.11 List of abbreviations 15 2 CONDITIONS OF ACCESS 16 2.1 Introduction 16 2.2 General conditions of access to the railway infrastructure 16 2.3 Types of agreement 17 2.4 Regulations and additional provisions 17 2.5 Special consignments 19 2.6 Transportation of hazardous goods 19 2.7 Requirements for the rolling stock 19 2.8 Requirements for the staff of the AP or the involved RU 20 2.9 Special conditions -
Barrier Free Conditions of Mass Rapid Transit Stations in Hong Kong
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Muroran-IT Academic Resource Archive Barrier Free Conditions of Mass Rapid Transit Stations in Hong Kong 著者 OSAKAYA Yoshiyuki, AOYAMA Takeshi, RATANAMART Suphawadee journal or Proceedings of TRANSED 2010 publication title volume 2010 number A078 page range 1-10 year 2010-06-02 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10258/1148 Barrier Free Conditions of Mass Rapid Transit Stations in Hong Kong 著者 OSAKAYA Yoshiyuki, AOYAMA Takeshi, RATANAMART Suphawadee journal or Proceedings of TRANSED 2010 publication title volume 2010 number A078 page range 1-10 year 2010-06-02 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10258/1148 BARRIER FREE CONDITIONS OF MASS RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS IN HONG K ONG Osakaya Yoshiyuki ,Muroran Institute of Technology Muroran ,Japan ,E-mail : osakaya@mmm .muroran-i t. ac .jp Aoyama Takeshi ,Muroran City Council Muroran ,Japan ,E-mail : t-aoyama@beige .plala .or .jp Ratanamart Suphawadee , King Mongkut Institute of Technology Ladkrabang Bangkok ,Thailand ,E-mail : nuibooks@yahoo .com SUMMARY In In Hong Kong ,it is estimated that aging will be rapidly going on after 2010 Increase Increase of the elderly means increase of the disabled . In Hong Kong , there are 3 KCR lines (East Li ne ,West Li ne and Ma On Shan Li ne) and 7 MTR lines (Kwun Tong Li ne ,Tsuen Wan Li ne , Island Li ne ,Tsueng Wan 0 Li ne ,Tung Chung Li ne , Airport Airport Li ne and Disneyland Li ne) in 2006 This This study firstly made the actual conditions of barrier free at all 81 stations clear It It secondly made problems clear . -
Announcement of Unaudited Results for the Six Months Ended 30 June 2020
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this announcement, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this announcement. MTR CORPORATION LIMITED 香港鐵路有限公司 (the “Company”) (Incorporated in Hong Kong with limited liability) (Stock code: 66) ANNOUNCEMENT OF UNAUDITED RESULTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED 30 JUNE 2020 RESULTS Six months ended 30 June HK$ million 2020 2019 Change Revenue from recurrent businesses 21,592 28,272 -23.6% Profit from recurrent businesses^ 433 2,665 -83.8% Profit from property development 5,200 775 +571.0% Investment property revaluation (loss) / gain (5,967) 2,066 n/m Net (loss) / profit attributable to shareholders of the Company (334) 5,506 n/m ^ : including share of profit /( loss) of associates and joint venture n/m : not meaningful - Interim ordinary dividend of HK$0.25 per share declared (with scrip dividend alternative) HIGHLIGHTS Hong Kong Businesses - Hong Kong transport operations, station commercial and property rental businesses have been significantly and adversely affected as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Various relief measures have been offered to our passengers as well as tenants to ease their financial burden during the pandemic - In spite of the pandemic, train service delivery and passenger journeys on-time in our heavy rail remained at 99.9% world-class level - Tuen Ma Line Phase 1 was opened in February 2020. -
Whole Fruit Address Store List
Whole Fruit Address Store List Shop C, G/F., Elle Bldg., 192-198 Shaukiwan Road, Shaukiwan, HK Shop 3 & 4 Yue Fung House, Yue Wan Estate, HK Shop 120 & Portion of Shop 119 Level 1, New Jade Shopping Arcade, Chai Wan, HK Shop E, G/F, Hing Cheung Building, 15-31 Shaukiwan Road, HK Shop A, G/F, Healthy Village, 180-182 Tsat Tsz Mui Rd, Podium Lvl, NP, HK G/F & C/L, Siu King Bldg., 14-16 Tsat Tsz Mui Rd, North PoiN.T., HK G/F., 98 Electric Road, North PoiN.T., HK Shop G14 on G/F., Fu Shan Mansion, Stage III, Tai Koo Shing, HK Shop No.47 + 48, Harmony Garden, 9 Siu Sai Wan Road, Chai Wan, HK Shop C,D,E & F, G/F., 8 North PoiN.T. Road, North PoiN.T., HK G/F., Shop 3, Hing Wah Shopping CeN.T.re, Hing Wah Estate, Chai Wan, HK Shop No.G5, G/F., Fok Cheong Building, Nos.1032-1044 King's Rd., HK G/F., King's Road 963A, Quarry Bay, HK Shop 6 G/F, Home World, ProvideN.T. CeN.T.re, 21-53 Wharf Rd, North PoiN.T., HK Shop 3, G/F., Youth Outreach Jockey Club Building,1-18 Hing Man Street, Shaukeiwan, HK Shop No.1 on Lower Ground Floor, Braemar Hill Shopping CeN.T.re, No.45 Braemar Hill Road, Braemar Hill, HK Shop GC04, G/F., Lei King Wan, Site C, 35 Tai Hong Street, HK Shop C & D, G/F, Yan Wo Building, 70 Java Road, North PoiN.T., HK Shop No. -
Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020
Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020 List of contents List of country abbreviations and regulatory bodies .................................................. 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 9 2. Network characteristics of the railway market ........................................ 11 2.1. Total route length ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Electrified route length ............................................................................................. 12 2.3. High-speed route length ........................................................................................... 13 2.4. Main infrastructure manager’s share of route length .............................................. 14 2.5. Network usage intensity ........................................................................................... 15 3. Track access charges paid by railway undertakings for the Minimum Access Package .................................................................................................. 17 4. Railway undertakings and global rail traffic ............................................. 23 4.1. Railway undertakings ................................................................................................ 24 4.2. Total rail traffic ......................................................................................................... -
284248 Carl-William Palmqvist
Delays and Timetabling for Passenger Trains CARL-WILLIAM PALMQVIST FACULTY OF ENGINEERING | LUND UNIVERSITY 2019 317 Travel by train has increased steadily for the last 30 years. In order to build trust in and shift even more traffic to railways, more trains must arrive on time. In practice, many train delays are caused by small disturbances at stations, which add up. One issue is that the scheduled dwell times are simply too short. Another is that punctuality falls quickly if it is either warm or cold. A third is that interactions between trains rarely go as planned. One suggestion for how to reduce delays is to paint markings that show where passengers should wait. Another is to remove switches, so that remaining ones can be better maintained. A third is to make railways more resilient to the weather variations of today, and to the climate changes of tomorrow. Cost-effective improvements can also be made with timetables. More of the planning can be automated, so that planners can focus more on setting appropriate dwell times and on improving the timetabling guidelines. This way, many more trains can be on time. Lund University Faculty of Engineering Department of Technology and Society Bulletin 317 953103 ISBN 978-91-7895-310-3 ISSN 1653-1930 789178 CODEN: LUTVDG/(TVTT-1059)1-105 9 317 Delays and Timetabling for Passenger Trains Delays and Timetabling for Passenger Trains Carl-William Palmqvist DOCTORAL DISSERTATION by due permission of the Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Sweden. To be defended at V:C, V-House. John Ericssons väg 1, Lund. -
On Stage, Stagecoach Group, Stagecoach South West Mark Whittle 01392 889747 Operating Companies
Going topless Reaching a in New new level York of control The newspaper of Stagecoach Group Issue 54 Spring 2004 Stagecoach joins Danes in bid for rail franchise tagecoach Group has linked up with Danish State SRailways (DSB) to bid for a major UK rail franchise. Carry on The Group has taken a 29.9% majority of passenger rail services in stake in South Eastern Railways Ltd, a Denmark and has further franchise company set up by DSB, to bid for operations in other Scandinavian the new Integrated Kent franchise in countries. logging on south-east England. It is an independent Public Three other companies – GNER, Corporation, owned by the Danish Carry on megabus.com! First Group and a consortium of Go- Government, and is managed by a That was the message Ahead and Keolis, of France – have Board of Directors and an Executive from bubbly actress been shortlisted for the seven to 10- Committee, who are responsible for Barbara Windsor when year franchise. the day-to-day business. she helped launch Integrated Kent, which will be let Executive Vice President and CFO Britain’s first low-cost from early 2005, of DSB, Søren internet bus service. will include routes Eriksen said: And, with tickets on the national rail ‘Both Stagecoach “Stagecoach has available from just £1 network throug- extensive through megabus.com, the hout Kent, parts of and DSB share a experience with initiative is catching the Sussex and South- train operations in public’s imagination for East London. It will commitment to the UK and DSB is catching a bus.