DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Dc Historic Preservation Plan Produced by the DC Historic Preservation Ofce Designed by Kim Elliott Printed September 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 Dc Historic Preservation Plan Produced by the DC Historic Preservation Ofce Designed by Kim Elliott Printed September 2013 2016 District of Columbia Historic Preservation Plan Enriching Our Heritage 1 introduction 5 Enriching our heritage The district of columbia’s vision for historic preservation 2 dc history and heritage 13 People and progress A legacy of visionary plans Landmarks and milestones A succession of eras 3 preservation achievements 49 What works about preservation in dc 4 preservation challenges 59 Constituents talk about preservation Another round of public dialogue Evaluating government resources New opportunities for a growing city 5 goals, objectives, and actions 65 Setting shared goals Taking action together Recognizing historic resources Appreciating our history Protecting historic properties Planning for our heritage 6 implementation 77 Achieving our goals 7 resources and appendices 87 Bibliography Credits and acknowledgements introduction 1 Enriching our heritage Introduction A Path Forward to 2016 A Guide for Everyone Plan Organization Now almost 225 years old, the District of Columbia is This plan is a guide to a broad range of historic preservation This plan is intended for everyone in the District of The plan is organized in seven chapters: uncommonly fortunate in its cultural, historical, and eforts through 2016. It lays out a manageable list of goals Columbia. It is not merely a program plan for the architectural legacy. It is a heritage that is rich and varied, and suggests the actions the HPO, city agencies, federal operations of the DC Historic Preservation Ofce. On First, it portrays images for a common vision, and reviews manifesting itself in the city’s majestic museums and partners, cultural organizations, preservation non-profts, its most basic level, preservation is a group activity. It our history and heritage — Chapters 1 and 2. monuments, cohesive neighborhoods, diverse places of and other partners can take collectively in the near term to is property owners—whether government agencies, work and worship, and scenic parks and landscapes. Its help achieve a long-range vision. It strives to include a wide businesses, or homeowners—who actually preserve the Then it assesses our strengths and challenges, and layers of history extend well beyond the built environment, range of activities and be responsive to many opinions, District’s historic resources. Community organizations proposes the goals we should set and actions we to the stories of people, communities, and institutions that while also setting priorities that will allow us to focus on the and volunteers foster pride in our history and advocate should take to reinforce our strengths and confront our have contributed to the making of this place. most pressing of our needs. for the benefts of preservation through the democratic challenges — Chapters 3, 4, and 5. process. Schools, cultural institutions, and a multitude of This legacy survives not just by chance. It is the result of the Several major themes weave through this plan and underlie congregations preserve and pass on our heritage to the In Chapter 6, it looks in depth at our goals and charts concerted eforts of citizens, organizations, business leaders, many of its recommendations. They refect a critical next generation. Everyone enjoys our civic spaces and draws how to respond over the next four years to the and government ofcials advocating for the value of the assessment of where preservation stands now, based upon inspiration from the life of our city. preservation mandates of the District’s Comprehensive city’s historic resources. Fifty years ago, when an organized the public comments received and a thoughtful look at Plan. approach to preservation frst began in the District, the what the city’s preservation community is doing well and Inevitably, most of the goals in this plan involve the And fnally, in Chapter 7, it includes a list of planning population was declining and traditional urbanism was not so well. Historic Preservation Ofce (HPO) and Historic Preservation resources and describes how to give critical feedback losing favor. Advocates for history fought not just the Review Board (HPRB), the government bodies responsible throughout the life of this plan. Your thoughts, random demolition of “obsolete” structures for parking lots, These fve themes are: for implementing preservation laws. But government suggestions, observations, and participation are needed but massive renewal schemes that could destabilize whole ofcials cannot fulfll the purposes of these laws without as we move forward together. neighborhoods. They advanced an alternative vision that Preservation should get back to basics. Preservation the participation and support of the community at large. our communities are irreplaceable assets, and most of their 1 should concentrate on what most people Government relies on the commitment and contributions of fabric can be sustained and renewed rather than replaced. understand is valuable. many partners working for the common good of the city. During the past 50 years, preservation of our heritage has We should build from an understanding of history. become an inseparable part of the District’s revitalization. 2 Telling the story of our communities is the way to A Tens of thousands of historic buildings have been protected foster civic pride in the accomplishments of the past. and adapted to meet modern needs. There has not always beenA agreement in every case, but the general goal of Preservationists should work together. Partnerships respecting the city’s historic buildings and character enjoys 3 are essential to draw on all available talents and widespread support. resources, communicate efectively, and make progress toward common goals. Now, with a strong economy, surging population, and rising land and housing costs, the pressure for redevelopment in We should celebrate our achievements. Our historic the District has intensifed. Smart growth and sustainability 4 environment is in remarkable condition overall, and are important policy goals, and must be accommodated preservationists can take credit for decades of solid along with preservation. New residents bring vitality, but accomplishment. perhaps diferent expectations about the city they now live in. And they may not share the same understanding or Preservation should consider new possibilities. A awareness of local heritage as long-time District residents. 5 changing city presents new opportunities, but new tools and approaches are also needed to address the In this changing environment, we cannot rely on the same challenges we face. assumptions and the past approaches to preservation alone. We can sustain and improve upon tools that work well, but we must also look for new strategies to ensure that the methods of preservation keep pace in a changing city. This plan aims to start down that road in order to ensure that our historic heritage remains a vital and valued part of our daily lives. 6 Duplex McGill House in LeDroit Park A Plan Methodology Connections to Long-Range Planning B Seeking Public Views This document is unlike, and we hope better than, any This plan builds on the broad vision outlined in the District’s Planning for this document began in earnest in early previous plan produced by the DC Historic Preservation Comprehensive Plan, Growing An Inclusive City: From Vision 2012. To help us with the efort, HPO convened a steering Ofce. With it we begin a new chapter in how we as a to Reality, which serves as the framework document for all committee of local preservation leaders and stakeholders. community plan cooperatively for the District’s cultural planning eforts in the city. The DC Council adopted the The committee met twice in the summer of 2012 to review resources, and how we communicate with each other about Comprehensive Plan in 2006 after substantial review by the the previous plan, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of preservation in the city. community at large—and for the Historic Features Element, local preservation eforts, and provide guidance on priorities by the preservation community in particular. for the future. A public working session was convened at In 2000, HPO became a part of the DC Ofce of Planning. the Sumner School Museum and Archives on September 13, That merger came from the recognition that protection of Since this Historic Preservation Plan fulflls the District’s 2012, open to all and attended by about 50 city residents. the city’s cultural heritage was more of a planning function requirement for the State Historic Preservation Ofce to Participants at the public meeting discussed ideas and than one of reviewing construction permits when plans prepare and periodically update a state historic preservation recommendations in a series of small-group sessions. reached the implementation stage—in other words, once plan, it has also been informed by National Park Service the train was already leaving the station. guidelines for preservation planning. Preparation of the The frst draft of this plan was released for public comment plan has been further supported by a review of the recent in early 2013. This led to another round of revision and Some were initially skeptical about what that move might Annual Reports submitted to the Council of the District of consultation, described further in Chapter 4 mean for the integrity of the city’s historic preservation Columbia, describing achievements in implementing the program. In the dozen years since that merger, however, the DC historic preservation law. Recent accomplishments are We continue to welcome public comments about the 2016 city’s planning and preservation eforts have intermeshed summarized in an Implementation Report that accompanies DC Historic Preservation Plan, and yours are welcome: see in unforeseen ways that have strengthened both. We now this plan. Chapter 7 for how to share your thoughts. function as inseparable parts of a more inclusive planning process that is helping to propel the growth of the city by building on its natural strengths and competitive A advantages. We can now focus on attracting the kind of new economic engines that thrive in the cultural and physical D environment that the District of Columbia provides in abundance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Active Tanks
    All Active Tanks As of 10/14/2020 Facility Id Owner Name Facility Name Street Address Tank# Substance Capacity Installed Status 5000360 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-5377 1 FLORIDA AV NE 1 Gasoline 12000 4/28/1982 Currently In LLC Use 5000360 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-5377 1 FLORIDA AV NE 2 Gasoline 8000 4/28/1982 Currently In LLC Use 5000360 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-5377 1 FLORIDA AV NE 3 Gasoline 8000 4/28/1982 Currently In LLC Use 7000592 DEPARTMENT OF DPW-FMA 6TH DISTRICT 100 42ND ST NE 5 Gasoline 10000 6/8/2000 Currently In PUBLIC WORKS FUEL SITE Use 7000592 DEPARTMENT OF DPW-FMA 6TH DISTRICT 100 42ND ST NE 6 Diesel 10000 6/8/2000 Currently In PUBLIC WORKS FUEL SITE Use 9000855 ARCHITECT OF THE RUSSEL BUILDING 100 CONSTITUTION AV NE 1 Diesel 5000 5/10/2011 Currently In CAPITOL C ST & DELAWARE AVE NE Use 2000414 DEPARTMENT OF FORRESTAL BUILDING. 1000 INDEPENDENCE AV SW 2 Diesel 6000 5/1/1998 Currently In ENERGY Use 2001135 CAPITAL PARK CAPITAL PARK 101 G ST SW 2 Heating Oil 20000 5/1/1998 Currently In APARTMENTS LTD APARTMENTS LP Use PARTNERSHIP 2000287 DC FIRE DCFD ENGINE CO. #16 1018 13TH ST NW 1 Diesel 1000 7/17/1947 Temporarily DEPARTMENT Out of Use 4000180 NATIONAL NATIONAL 102 IRVING ST NW 2 Heating Oil 10000 12/1/1997 Currently In REHABILITATION REHABILITATION Use HOSPITAL HOSPITAL 5000201 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-7582 1020 MICHIGAN AV NE 3 Gasoline 10000 5/26/1981 Currently In LLC Use 5000201 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-7582 1020 MICHIGAN AV NE 4 Gasoline 10000 5/26/1981 Currently In LLC Use 5000201 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-7582 1020 MICHIGAN AV NE 5 Gasoline 10000 5/26/1981 Currently In LLC Use 5000201 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-7582 1020 MICHIGAN AV NE 6 Diesel 10000 5/26/1981 Currently In LLC Use 2001061 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Americaspeaks
    AMERICASPEAKS ENGAGING CITIZEN VOICES IN GOVERNANCE Skyland Town Hall Meeting Report to the National Capital Revitalization Corporation November 13, 2004 Made Possible in part by a Grant from the Annie E. Casey Foundation Summary Report of Proceedings District residents from Wards 7 and 8 came together on Saturday, November 13 to set priorities for the redevelopment of Skyland Shopping Center. Over the course of the five hour meeting, participants listened to presentations about the redevelopment process, discussed the retail mix of the future site, considered its look and feel, and discussed how the community could best take advantage of economic opportunities created by the redevelopment. When asked to evaluate the Town Meeting, 100 percent of participants said they had learned something from their participation in the Town Meeting. Eighty-four percent of participants rated the meeting as “excellent” or “good” (49 percent rating it as “excellent”.) Ninety-one percent of participants rated the use of technology at the Town Meeting as “excellent” or “good” (82 percent rating it as “excellent). Seventy percent of participants said they were “very unsatisfied” with the mix of stores currently at Skyland. Similarly, 66 percent of participants said they were “very unsatisfied” with the physical condition of Skyland and 63 percent said they were “very unsatisfied” with the level of safety there. The heart of the meeting was a discussion of the future retail mix for the new Skyland Shopping Center. Participants first considered the kinds of stores that they would like to see in the site. After prioritizing the kinds of stores to go on the site, they identified specific brands for each of the top categories.
    [Show full text]
  • District Columbia
    PUBLIC EDUCATION FACILITIES MASTER PLAN for the Appendices B - I DISTRICT of COLUMBIA AYERS SAINT GROSS ARCHITECTS + PLANNERS | FIELDNG NAIR INTERNATIONAL TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A: School Listing (See Master Plan) APPENDIX B: DCPS and Charter Schools Listing By Neighborhood Cluster ..................................... 1 APPENDIX C: Complete Enrollment, Capacity and Utilization Study ............................................... 7 APPENDIX D: Complete Population and Enrollment Forecast Study ............................................... 29 APPENDIX E: Demographic Analysis ................................................................................................ 51 APPENDIX F: Cluster Demographic Summary .................................................................................. 63 APPENDIX G: Complete Facility Condition, Quality and Efficacy Study ............................................ 157 APPENDIX H: DCPS Educational Facilities Effectiveness Instrument (EFEI) ...................................... 195 APPENDIX I: Neighborhood Attendance Participation .................................................................... 311 Cover Photograph: Capital City Public Charter School by Drew Angerer APPENDIX B: DCPS AND CHARTER SCHOOLS LISTING BY NEIGHBORHOOD CLUSTER Cluster Cluster Name DCPS Schools PCS Schools Number • Oyster-Adams Bilingual School (Adams) Kalorama Heights, Adams (Lower) 1 • Education Strengthens Families (Esf) PCS Morgan, Lanier Heights • H.D. Cooke Elementary School • Marie Reed Elementary School
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 DC HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN Plan Methodology Connections to Long-Range Planning B Seeking Public Views
    2020 District of Columbia Historic Preservation Plan Preserving For Progress 1 introduction 1 Preserving for progress The district of columbia’s vision for historic preservation 2 dc history and heritage 9 People and progress A legacy of visionary plans Landmarks and milestones A succession of eras 3 preservation achievements 45 What works about preservation in dc 4 preservation challenges 55 Gathering public views Balancing growth and character Protecting neighborhoods Communicating preservation basics Leading the nation Planning for preservation Evaluating available resources 5 goals, objectives, and actions 65 Setting shared goals Sustaining our progress Preservation in context A new planning cycle Recognizing historic resources Engaging communities Improving protections Maintaining our heritage 6 implementation 79 Achieving our goals 7 resources and appendices 89 Bibliography Credits and acknowledgements introduction 1 Preserving for progress Introduction Continuing on a Path Forward A Guide for Everyone Plan Organization Now well into its third century, the District of Columbia is This plan for 2020 updates the goals established in the Preservation requires collective action. Community The 2020 plan is organized in seven chapters: fortunate in the exceptional value of its cultural, historical, District’s historic preservation plan for the four years ending organizations and volunteers foster pride in our history and and architectural heritage. This is a rich and varied legacy, in 2016. That plan introduced a new framework for planning advocate for the benefits of preservation. Schools, cultural • First, it describes a common vision, and reviews our manifested not just in the city’s majestic museums and that could be sustained through regular updates in the institutions, and a multitude of congregations maintain history and heritage — Chapters 1 and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward 7 Heritage Guide
    WARD 7 HERITAGE GUIDE A Discussion of Ward 7 Cultural and Heritage Resources Ward 7 Heritage Guide Text by Patsy M. Fletcher, DC Historic Preservation Office Design by Kim Elliott, DC Historic Preservation Office Published 2013 Unless stated otherwise, photographs and images are from the DC Office of Planning collection. This project has been funded in part by U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund grant funds, administered by the District of Columbia’s Historic Preservation Office. The contents and opinions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Depart- ment of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the U.S. Department of the Interior. This program has received Federal financial assistance for the identification, protection, and/or rehabilitation of historic properties and cultural resources in the District of Columbia. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability in its Federally assisted programs. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction......................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • 0104FITP-Public Hearing
    1 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DDOT) + + + + + PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED D.C. CIRCULATOR MAJOR SERVICE CHANGES + + + + + THURSDAY, JANUARY 4, 2018 + + + + + The Public Hearing was held in the Miracle Theater, 535 8th Street, SE, Washington, DC, at 7:30 p.m., Sean Egan, Deputy Associate Director of Transit Operations, DDOT, presiding. PRESENT: SEAN EGAN, Deputy Associate Director for Transit Operations, DDOT DAVID KOCH, Transportation Analyst, DDOT CIRCE TORRUELLAS, Citywide Planner, DDOT SAM ZIMBABWE, Chief Project Delivery Officer, DDOT ALSO PRESENT: RACHEL LESNIAK, Foursquare Integrated Transportation Planning DAVID MILLER, Foursquare Integrated Transportation Planning Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 2 1 P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S 2 7:31 p.m. 3 MR. EGAN: All right. If everyone 4 could please take their seats, we'd really like 5 to get started. So, good evening, everyone. 6 On behalf of the District Department 7 of Transportation, I'd like to welcome you to 8 tonight's public hearing for the major service 9 changes that we're proposing. 10 So, my name's Sean Egan. I'm the 11 Deputy Associate Director for Transit Operations 12 at DDOT, and I have some other DDOT colleagues 13 that I'm joined by here tonight, that some of you 14 met during the Q & A session. 15 So, I'm joined by Circe Torruellas, 16 there, who's the Manager of the D.C. Circulator 17 Program, as well as Sam Zimbabwe, who's the Chief 18 Project Delivery Officer for DDOT.
    [Show full text]
  • ANC-7B-2020-Annual-Report
    2020 ANNUAL REPORT Advisory Neighborhood Commission 7B Government of the District of Columbia Prepared by: ANC Commissioner – Nicole Smith-McDermott 1 2 Commissioners Patricia Howard-Chittams – 7B01 (Interim Secretary) Tiffany L. Brown – 7B02 (Vice Chair) Benjamin Crane – 7B03 (Treasurer) Nicole Smith-McDermott – 7B04 Villareal Johnson – 7B05 (Secretary) April Pradier – 7B06 Lynell Humphrey – 7B07 (Chair) www.anc7b.com 3 OVERVIEW Advisory Neighborhood Commission 7B Introduction Advisory Neighborhood Commission 7B herein referred to as ANC 7B or 7B, unanimously voted to file this Annual Report with the Mayor and DC Council and publish the Report on the Commission’s website at www.anc7b.com. This Report satisfies the Commission’s statutory reporting obligations. For further guidance please see DC Code § 1-309.10(j)(1) (providing that each Commission may file an annual report with the Council and the Mayor for the preceding fiscal year), (n-1) (providing that each Commission shall publish an annual report summarizing its activities over the preceding 12 months). www.anc7b.com 4 Achievements Advisory Neighborhood Commission 7B (ANC7B or “The Commission”) serving the Randall Highlands, Dupont Park, Hillcrest, Fairfax Village, Naylor Gardens, Park Naylor, Twinning, Penn Branch and Fort Davis communities, holds public meetings which are open to every member of the community to discuss matters impacting the area, share important information, and make policy recommendations to city officials by way of resolutions and letters of support as needed. The Commission is made up of seven (7) members, each representing about 2,000 residents within their community. ANC7B’s executive meetings are held on the first (1st) Thursday of every month.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing in the Nation's Capital
    Housing in the Nation’s2005 Capital Foreword . 2 About the Authors. 4 Acknowledgments. 4 Executive Summary . 5 Introduction. 12 Chapter 1 City Revitalization and Regional Context . 15 Chapter 2 Contrasts Across the District’s Neighborhoods . 20 Chapter 3 Homeownership Out of Reach. 29 Chapter 4 Narrowing Rental Options. 35 Chapter 5 Closing the Gap . 43 Endnotes . 53 References . 56 Appendices . 57 Prepared for the Fannie Mae Foundation by the Urban Institute Margery Austin Turner G. Thomas Kingsley Kathryn L. S. Pettit Jessica Cigna Michael Eiseman HOUSING IN THE NATION’S CAPITAL 2005 Foreword Last year’s Housing in the Nation’s Capital These trends provide cause for celebration. adopted a regional perspective to illuminate the The District stands at the center of what is housing affordability challenges confronting arguably the nation’s strongest regional econ- Washington, D.C. The report showed that the omy, and the city’s housing market is sizzling. region’s strong but geographically unbalanced But these facts mask a much more somber growth is fueling sprawl, degrading the envi- reality, one of mounting hardship and declining ronment, and — most ominously — straining opportunity for many District families. Home the capacity of working families to find homes price escalation is squeezing families — espe- they can afford. The report provided a portrait cially minority and working families — out of of a region under stress, struggling against the city’s housing market. Between 2000 and forces with the potential to do real harm to 2003, the share of minority home buyers in the the quality of life throughout the Washington District fell from 43 percent to 37 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • THE COMMUNICATOR! Marshall Heights Community Development Organization, Inc
    Link Viewing Tip: To open links in a new window, right click on the link and select “ Open link in new tab” August 1, 2018 THE COMMUNICATOR! Marshall Heights Community Development Organization, Inc. Newsletter News, and Updates of What’s Going On, In, And Around Ward 7! In this issue: August National Immunization Awareness Month AUGUST IS NATIONAL IMMUNIZATION MHCDO's Upcoming Affordable Housing Events AWARENESS MONTH Celebrate National Night Out 2018 - 8/7/18 VACCINES ARE NOT JUST FOR KIDS DC Public School Beautification—8/18/18 ARE YOUR VACCINES UP TO DATE??? All adults should get recommended vaccines to protect Inclusionary Zoning “New Changes” their health. Even healthy adults can become ill and pass Free Bike Repair—8/11 & 8/25 diseases on to others especially to those who are most Ward 7 and 8 Community Calendar vulnerable to serious complications (such as infants and Free Resources and/or Reduced Fee Programs young children, the elderly and those with chronic condi- News from Ward 7 Councilmember Vincent Gray tions and weakened immune systems). News From Mayor Muriel Bowser Everyone should have their vaccination needs assessed Deanwood Residents Want Grocery Store & Market-rate Homes by a health care professional. Certain vaccines are recom- Introduction to Grant Writing Free class — 8/11/18 mended based on a person’s age, occupation or health Hillcrest A Haven For DC's Black Middle Class conditions (such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary Deanwood Metro Station Public Hearing Staff Report — 8/3/18 disease, diabetes or heart disease). Penn Branch Wins out Development 1.
    [Show full text]
  • U Street Historic District Brochure Has Been Funded with the Assistance of a Matching Grant from the U.S
    GREATER USTREET HISTORIC DISTRICTU th 16 PriorPrior toto thethe CivilCivil War,War, thethe areaarea toto becomebecome thethe GreaterGreater UU StreetStreet HistoricHistoric DistrictDistrict waswas sparselysparsely developed,developed, asas illustratedillustrated onon thisthis 18571857 MapMap ofof WWashingtonashington City,City, byby A.A. Boschke.Boschke. Library of Congress, Geography/Map Division. GREATER USTREET HISTORIC DISTRICT Once described as a “city within a city” for its early-to-mid- 20th-century days as Washington’s preeminent African-American community, the Greater U Street Historic District is currently a thriving residential and commercial neighborhood of northwest Washington. The district’s main artery, U Street, flows through the center of the neighborhood, offering a variety of stores, restaurants, small businesses, night clubs and other entertainment venues in renovated 19th and early 20th-century buildings. Some of these buildings, which today cater to a diverse crowd of residents and tourists, were built by and for the African-American community as fraternal organizations, theaters, and jazz clubs, earning U Street its national designation as “Black Broadway” and a reputation as a center of African-American life. Leaders in the civil rights movement, law, education, music, the arts, and humanities were residents, founders, and frequent patrons of U Street and its establishments. On all sides of U Street, the surrounding grid of streets is defined by cohesive collections of 19th-century residential row houses punctuated by individual churches, corner stores and schools. These buildings, the majority of which were built between 1870 and 1905, are typical of the city’s post-Civil War speculative development and preceded the area’s rise as the center of Washington’s African-American community.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS form 10-900 OMS Mo. 70244010 (R«v. &46) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places NOV 2 8 1988 Registration Form NATIONAL This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property___________________________________________________ historic name True Reformer Building_________ ______ __ other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number 1200 U Street. N.W. I I not tor publication city, town Washington |_) vicinity N/A state District of Columbia code DC county N/A code 001 zip code ?mnQ 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property [fl private IY1 building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I I public-local I I district 1 0 buildings [~~i public-State I site 0 sites [ 1 public-Federal I I structure 0 . structures I I object 0 0 . objects 1 0 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A listed in the National Register 0______ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this B nomination I_i request for.
    [Show full text]
  • Far Southeast II Livability Study TO
    RIDGE RD GORMAN TER VE H ST A ADRIAN ST C G ST ST MA G TO H I ST O I F I Legend P V O L ES PL R LT T OP T BAYLEY PL D ER 15THST U K ST BARNEY CIR Anacostia 32ND ST P O 31STST K ST CROISSANT PL N 13THST H ST H ST Park T L ST 30THST D Streets M PL R BURNS ST AY HILDRETH ST REEW LYNDALE PL SOUTHEAST F M ST River M ST Anacostia Fwy LOUD PL Fort Dupont Park Parks M ST MINNESOTA AVE R D Ward 7 WATER ST WY N ST IA F BURNS ST OST TIAN ANAC OS IC N ST C 34THST 30THST Ward 8 H 34TH PL NA O T N ST A L N S Q BRANCHAVE SO A MASSACHUSETTS AVE Anacostia N F Y NASH PL Massa ST N NASH PL Study Area Boundary O E POPE ST ' 31STPL U L 37TH PL Park 29THST Anacostia River N Pennsylvania Ave SE O ST NAYLORG RD O ST Twining chusetts Ave SE S Pope Branch Park 11TH ST BRIDGE T P ST PALMER PL NASH ST ANACOSTIAFAIRLAWN FWY AVE P ST 35TH ST NASH ST ANACOSTIA DR PARK PL 34TH ST Q ST Fairlawn Penn Branch Dupont Park BARKER LN POPE ST T Q ST H S I E G T P S O Minnesota Ave SE H P Fort Davis Fairlawn Ave SE 27THST H 23RD ST W ARPENT 19THST C E R O ST T 8 28THST O D 3 Park 21STPL R ST D R 17THST 25THST Randle RIDGE PL 33RD PL NASH ST 28THPL E RIDGE PL West OverBranch Ave SE WestST OverR V 18THST Fort Davis D A Fort Davis S ST 16THST Highlands T PENNSYLVANIA AVE S 29THST S ST 22ND ST Highlands S ST S R A 38TH ST 1 View E EX Q ST 3 V T 23RD ST TEXAS AVE O T ST T S ST T 24TH PL L W S S ST P S PL 42ND Marbury Plaza E T 42ND ST T ST IS N T ST V O T ST T P GOOD HOPE RD S R T A D U VIS S D D A D U ST 21ST PL D IS T Fort Davis R T R T T PL 33 R V O R O A F R S 41STST D O F U
    [Show full text]