Bristol, Africa and the Eighteenth Century Slave Trade To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bristol, Africa and the Eighteenth Century Slave Trade To BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY'S PUBLICATIONS General Editor: JOSEPH BE1TEY, M.A., Ph.D., F.S.A. Assistant Editor: MISS ELIZABETH RALPH, M.A., F.S.A. VOL. XLII BRISTOL, AFRICA AND THE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY SLAVE TRADE TO AMERICA VOL. 3 THE YEARS OF DECLINE 1746-1769 BRISTOL, AFRICA AND THE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY SLAVE TRADE TO AMERICA VOL. 3 THE YEARS OF DECLINE 1746-1769 EDITED BY DAYID RICHARDSON Printed for the BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY 1991 ISBN 0 901538 12 4 ISSN 0305 8730 © David Richardson Bristol Record Society wishes to express its gratitude to the Marc Fitch Fund and to the University of Bristol Publications Fund for generous grants in support of this volume. Produced for the Society by Alan Sutton Publishing Limited, Stroud, Glos. Printed in Great Britain CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements vi Introduction . vii Note on transcription xxxii List of abbreviations xxxiii ·Text 1 Index 235 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In the process of ·compiling and editing the information on Bristol voyages to Africa contained in this volume I have received assistance and advice from various individuals and organisations. The task of collecting the material was made much easier from the outset by the generous help and advice I received from the staff at the Public Record Office, the Bristol Record Office, the Bristol Central Library and the Bristol Society of Merchant Venturers. I am grateful to the Society of Merchant Venturers for permission to consult its records and to cite material from them. I am also indebted to the British Academy for its generosity in awarding me a grant in order to allow me to complete my research on Bristol voyages to Africa. Publication of the volume has been generously assisted by grants from the Bristol University Publications Fund and the Marc Fitch Fund. Finally, I am very grateful to Miss Mary Williams, former City Archivist in Bristol, and Professor Patrick McGrath, formerly General Editor of the Bristol Record Society, for their warm response to my original proposal for a series of volumes on Bristol voyages to Africa, and to Dr Joseph Bettey, the Society's present General Editor, for his patience and assistance in producing this third volume on African voyages. vi INTRODUCTION Bristol's emergence as a major slaving port was one of the more striking features of the development of British trade to Africa during the first forty years of the eighteenth century. Reflected in a growth in annual clearances of ships to Africa from less than 5 around 1700 to 50 or more at various times during the 1730s, the rapid expansion of Bristol's trade to Africa contributed substantially to the general increase in British slaving activity that occurred in the quarter century after 1713 and made it Britain's premier slaving port during the decade prior to the War of Jenkins' Ear. Bristol's ascendancy in Britain's African trade was relatively short lived, however, for after the outbreak of war with France in 1743, clearances of ships from Bristol to Africa fell abruptly and allowed Liverpool to begin to dominate the British slave trade. Despite conceding supremacy to its northern rival, Bristol's interest in the African trade revived strongly during the closing years of the War of Austrian Succession and generally remained substantial during the 1750s and 1760s. The data collected in this volume show, in fact, that Bristol merchants fitted out almost 600 voyages to Africa, the vast majority for slaves, between 1746 and 1769. The level of annual clearances of ships from Bristol to Africa in these decades still remained nevertheless only about half what it was at the peak of the port's involvement in the African trade in 1728-32 and 1737-8. The modest nature of the recovery of Bristol's African trade after the slump of 1743-6 is intriguing, for British trade in general with Africa expanded rapidly after 1748, largely as a result of a substantial growth in demand for slaves in the Caribbean and North America during the quarter century before the American Revolution. 1 The latest figures available suggest that exports of slaves from Africa by the British doubled during this period, rising from about 20,000 a year around 1750 to about 40,000 a year in the early 1770s. This expansion in slave shipments was reflected in turn by an increase in clearances of ships from British ports to Africa from approximately 90 to 160-190 a year. Almost all of this increase was accounted for by ports in north-west England, notably Liverpool, as well as London. Not surprisingly, therefore, Bristol's share of Britain's trade to Africa fell sharply from 1 David Richardson, "The Slave Trade, Sugar, and British Economic Growth, 1748-1776", Journal of Interdisciplinary History, XVII: no. 4 (1987), pp. 739-769. vii over 40 per cent in the 1730s to around 15 per cent in the early 1770s. 2 Despite their diminished importance in the Africa trade, Bristol merchants still remained one of the largest British and indeed European groups of investors in the Atlantic slave trade in the 1750s and 1760s. As a result, the material on Bristol voyages to Africa presented in this volume is an important source of information about the conduct and organisation of the Atlantic slave trade from Africa to America in these years. In the remaining sections of this introduction, I shall first discuss the major sources of evidence available for tracing Bristol voyages to Africa between 1746 and 1769 and then outline the major features of Bristol's slave trade in this period. /. SOURCES AND METHODOLOGY Although there are very few surviving collections of papers of Bristol merchants involved in the African trade in the early eighteenth century, official commercial and shipping records, as earlier volumes in this series have shown, still provide a large amount of information about the voyages of Bristol ships to Africa during the first half of the eighteenth century. Particularly useful in this respect are the Exchequer K.R. Port Books (PRO E190 series), the Mediterranean Passes (PRO ADM 7 series), the Bristol Wharfage Books (Society of Merchant Venturers Hall), and the Colonial Naval Office Shipping Lists (PRO CO series). The nature of these records and the sort of information they supply have been discussed in earlier volumes in this series and readers are referred to them for a detailed discussion of these matters. On certain aspects of Bristol's trade to Africa in the early eighteenth century, particularly its distribution along the coast and the numbers of slaves loaded per ship, these records provide only limited evidence. Nevertheless, they do supply important information about the ships involved in the African trade, their owners, their voyage patterns, and the numbers of slaves delivered to America. These records continue to supply vital data about Bristol voyages to Africa during the 25 years covered by the present volume. Sadly, there are no outward overseas Port Books available for Bristol between 1743 and 1751 and the inward books cease altogether after 1742. There is, however, a fairly continuous series of outward books from 1752 to 1769 and beyond, as well as good, though not complete, 2 Detailed estimates of the level of British slaving activity are to be found in David Richardson, "The Eighteenth-Century British Slave Trade: Estimates of its Volume and Distribution", Research in Economic History, XII (1989), pp. 151-195. These figures are slightly amended in David Richardson, "Slave Exports from West and West-Central Africa, 170(}..1810: New Estimates of Volume and Distribution", Journal of African History, 30 (1989), pp. 1-22. viii series of Mediterranean Passes and Wharfage Books throughout the period from 1746 to 1769. 3 As in earlier years, the survival rate of Naval Office Shipping Lists varies considerably from one colony to another in this period. There are only scattered lists for Barbados and apparently none at all for the four Leeward Islands of Antigua, Montserrat, Nevis and St Kitts. The lack of lists for Antigua and St Kitts is especially disappointing, for other evidence suggests these two colonies were important markets for Bristol slave traders in the quarter century after 1745. By comparison with the smaller British islands in the Caribbean, there are relatively good series of Naval Office Shipping Lists for South Carolina, Virginia and Jamaica throughout the period as well as lists for Grenada, one of the West Indian islands ceded by France to Britain in 1763, from 1764 to 1767. 4 The comparatively high survival rate of Jamaican lists after 1745 is important, for the island was the largest single market for slaves supplied by Bristol traders in this period. Information about Bristol voyages to Africa in 174(M)9 is also to be found in several other sources. Three deserve to be noted. First, there are several surveys of British trade to Africa during this period. These include a record kept by Gilbert Petrie, an official of the Company of Merchants Trading to Africa, of British &hips trading at the Gold Coast between 1755 and 1768; lists of Bristol ships trading to Africa in 1747, 1749 and 1754, together with the costs of their outlays, expected numbers of slaves, and intended trading location at the coast; and an annual listing of ships clearing Bristol for Africa that covers the whole period from 1750 to 1776. 5 Contained in the Board of Trade papers, this last document is particularly useful, for it lists the names of ships and their masters and allows one to cover some of the gaps that exist in other sources, notably the Port Books and Mediterranean Passes. Second, there is from 1752 onward a fairly complete series of a local newspaper, Felix Parley's Bristol Journal.
Recommended publications
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1997, Volume 92, Issue No. 2
    i f of 5^1- 1-3^-7 Summer 1997 MARYLAND Historical Magazine TU THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY Founded 1844 Dennis A. Fiori, Director The Maryland Historical Magazine Robert I. Cottom, Editor Patricia Dockman Anderson, Associate Editor Donna B. Shear, Managing Editor Jeff Goldman, Photographer Angela Anthony, Robin Donaldson Coblentz, Christopher T.George, Jane Gushing Lange, and Robert W. Schoeberlein, Editorial Associates Regional Editors John B. Wiseman, Frostburg State University Jane G. Sween, Montgomery Gounty Historical Society Pegram Johnson III, Accoceek, Maryland Acting as an editorial board, the Publications Committee of the Maryland Historical Society oversees and supports the magazine staff. Members of the committee are: John W. Mitchell, Upper Marlboro; Trustee/Ghair Jean H. Baker, Goucher Gollege James H. Bready, Baltimore Sun Robert J. Brugger, The Johns Hopkins University Press Lois Green Garr, St. Mary's Gity Gommission Toby L. Ditz, The Johns Hopkins University Dennis A. Fiori, Maryland Historical Society, ex-officio David G. Fogle, University of Maryland Jack G. Goellner, Baltimore Averil Kadis, Enoch Pratt Free Library Roland G. McGonnell, Morgan State University Norvell E. Miller III, Baltimore Richard Striner, Washington Gollege John G. Van Osdell, Towson State University Alan R. Walden, WBAL, Baltimore Brian Weese, Bibelot, Inc., Pikesville Members Emeritus John Higham, The Johns Hopkins University Samuel Hopkins, Baltimore Gharles McG. Mathias, Ghevy Ghase The views and conclusions expressed in this magazine are those of the authors. The editors are responsible for the decision to make them public. ISSN 0025-4258 © 1997 by the Maryland Historical Society. Published as a benefit of membership in the Maryland Historical Society in March, June, September, and December.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Chamber of Commerce, Members 1768-75, and 1779-83
    1 New York chamber of commerce, Members 1768-75, and 1779-83. Sources: Directories; Stevens, J. A. (1867), Colonial records of the New York chamber of commerce 1768-1784 (New York: John Trow), 2 vols.; Bishop, J. B. (1918) A chronicle of one hundred and fifty years: the chamber of commerce of the State of New York (New York: Charles Scribner). • Membership was 69 in the first year, about 109 in 1773, of which about 104 were still active in 1774. Directories state the membership was ‘about 90’ in 1775 and 1776 (Gaine’s Register). See R. J. Bennett (2011) Local Business Voice, pp. 132-43, 683-5. • Business details in period 1768-83; ptnr = formal business partner. • Note there are many vendue masters (an American term, from Dutch); these have been rephrased as auctioneers, though it seems likely that many were dealers in used goods as much as auctioneers. Officers - P: President; VP: Vice President; T: Treasurer; S: Secretary. Members 1768-74: names in italics are those elected in the first year of the chamber 1768-9. Name Office Birth/death Business Alexander, Robert c. 1745- Ptnr with Thompson; Importers beer, Irish beef, wine Allicocke, Joseph c. 1733- Merchant, wine spirits Alsop, John T: 1773-4 c. 1720-94 General imports VP: 1774-6 Amiel, John General groceries Bache, Theophylacte T: 1770-1 1735-1807 Imports Europe and India, shipowner, owned land VP: 1771-3 with Chas. McEvers and Young P: 1773-4 VP: 1788-92 Bayard, Samuel Imports Europe and India Bayard, William 1729- Sugar refiner, distilling; govt.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE from the FRICK COLLECTION
    ARCHIVED PRESS RELEASE from THE FRICK COLLECTION 1 EAST 70TH STREET • NEW YORK • NEW YORK 10021 • TELEPHONE (212) 288-0700 • FAX (212) 628-4417 First Special Presentation on Frick Porcelain in Fifteen Years Rococo Exotic: French Mounted Porcelains and the Allure of the East March 6 through June 10, 2007 In 1915 Henry Clay Frick acquired a magnificent group of eighteenth- century objets d’art to complete the décor of his new home at 1 East 70th Street. Among these was a striking pair of large mounted porcelains, the subject of an upcoming decorative arts focus presentation on view in the Cabinet gallery, the museum’s first ceramics exhibition in fifteen years. Visually splendid, delightfully inventive, and quintessentially French, the jars fuse eighteenth-century French Pair of Deep Blue Chinese Porcelain Jars with French Gilt-Bronze Mounts; porcelain, China, 1st half of the collectors’ love of rare Asian porcelains eighteenth century; gilt-bronze mounts, France, 1745–49; 17 7/8 x 18 5/8 x 10 11/16 in. (45.4 x 47.3 x 27.1 cm) and 18 7/16 x 18 5/8 x 10 5/8 in. (47 x 47.3 x 27 cm); The with their enthusiasm for natural exotica. Frick Collection, New York; photo: Michael Bodycomb Assembled in Paris shortly before 1750, the Frick jars are a hybrid of imported Chinese porcelain and French gilt-bronze mounts in the shape of bulrushes (curling along the handles) and shells, sea fans, corals, and pearls (on the lids). Displayed alongside these objects are French drawings and prints as well as actual seashells and corals, all from New York collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Piracy, Illicit Trade, and the Construction of Commercial
    Navigating the Atlantic World: Piracy, Illicit Trade, and the Construction of Commercial Networks, 1650-1791 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Jamie LeAnne Goodall, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2016 Dissertation Committee: Margaret Newell, Advisor John Brooke David Staley Copyright by Jamie LeAnne Goodall 2016 Abstract This dissertation seeks to move pirates and their economic relationships from the social and legal margins of the Atlantic world to the center of it and integrate them into the broader history of early modern colonization and commerce. In doing so, I examine piracy and illicit activities such as smuggling and shipwrecking through a new lens. They act as a form of economic engagement that could not only be used by empires and colonies as tools of competitive international trade, but also as activities that served to fuel the developing Caribbean-Atlantic economy, in many ways allowing the plantation economy of several Caribbean-Atlantic islands to flourish. Ultimately, in places like Jamaica and Barbados, the success of the plantation economy would eventually displace the opportunistic market of piracy and related activities. Plantations rarely eradicated these economies of opportunity, though, as these islands still served as important commercial hubs: ports loaded, unloaded, and repaired ships, taverns attracted a variety of visitors, and shipwrecking became a regulated form of employment. In places like Tortuga and the Bahamas where agricultural production was not as successful, illicit activities managed to maintain a foothold much longer.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2. Black Indies
    THE ‘BLACK INDIES’: THE NORTH EAST CONNECTIONS WITH THE SLAVERY BUSINESS Slavery and Abolition and People of African Descent in the North East. Part 2. Sean Creighton History & Social Action Publications August 2020 1 Introduction Although in the 18th Century the North East was called the ‘Black Indies’ because of its coal, its landed gentry and businessmen were involved in more than just coal. They exploited new opportunities that arose, including land and ownership of, and trading in, enslaved Africans to cultivate and harvest produce in the colonies in North America up to independence and the creation of the United States of America. Profits from these involvements helped shape the North East’s built environment, landed gentry estates, and industries to a greater extent than previously thought. Other North Easterners were involved in the army and naval forces used to defend the British colonies and to capture those of Britain’s European rivals, and to suppress revolts by the enslaved. It appears that before 2007 research concentration on the slave trade and the cotton towns, particularly Bristol, Liverpool and Manchester, limited understanding of the way other local and regional economies were interlinked into the slavery system. It was impossible for people in any part of Britain involved in industry and trade not to have had connections however tenuous with the slave economies. Those interlinks could be reinforced through the complexities of land ownership, marriage and inheritance across the country. This pamphlet is the second part of a series on the North East’s connections with the slavery business and involvements in campaigning for the abolition of the slave trade and slavery in the British Caribbean colonies and then in the United States, and the region’s history of people of African heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • This Month in Latin American History March 12, 1671 Henry Morgan
    This Month in Latin American History Depiction of the sack of Panama March 12, 1671 Henry Morgan returns to Port Royal following the sack of Panama As convoys of silver and other valuable cargo Between Spain and its New World colonies grew, Spain’s European rivals sought ways to profit from that trade. One of the most common tactics was to hire privateers- licensed pirates who sought to pick off ships or raid coastal communities along the main trade routes. In the 1660s, one of the most successful privateers was Henry Morgan of Wales, who had already staged several successful raids around the Caribbean before undertaking his most daring assault yet- an attack on Panama City. Even Before the construction of the Panama Canal in the early 20th century, the city was a crucial nexus of trade, But since it was on the Pacific side of the isthmus, the defenders were not prepared for Morgan’s force, which landed on the Caribbean side and marched across difficult terrain, taking the city almost completely By surprise. Despite the Spanish governor destroying most of the city’s treasury, Morgan’s crew remained for three weeks, and in the aftermath the Spanish reBuilt Panama city in a different, more defensible location. Upon his return to Port Royal, Jamaica, Morgan received a hero’s welcome, But not long afterward he was arrested, since he had technically broken a peace treaty between England and Spain. Though never punished, the Crown made it clear that Morgan was to retire- he was named deputy governor of Jamaica and awarded a large estate there, where he lived out his days in luxury.
    [Show full text]
  • Common and Noteworthy Instruments from 1750S-1800S' Eastern
    Common and Noteworthy Instruments from 1750s-1800s’ Eastern USA Emory Jacobs Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Scott Marosek Department of Music During the 1700s and 1800s, residents of the eastern seaboard of North America enjoyed a wide variety of instruments, many of them built for “contrast and variety.”1 Availability, on the other hand, was a different story. While few accounts of the musical scene in that time period exist for more rural settings, records of the area and the events of the period from 1750 through the 1800s paint an interesting picture of how specific social classes and needs determined an instrument’s popularity. At the time, instruments were highly controversial, especially among specific religious groups.2 The religious restrictions on music occurred in relatively isolated sub- cultures in America, whereas notable sources from Germany would spend a novel’s worth of pages praising how perfect the organ was and would carefully list the detail of instruments’ tuning, mechanisms, and origins.3 When comparing these European instrument lists or collections with confirmed colonial instruments, one finds that very few of the elaborate, most prized instruments were exported to North America. Even outside America’s religious institutions, instruments were sometimes considered profane.4 While some instruments and some musical styles escaped such stigma, other instruments and styles had more ominous ties or were considered inelegant; the violin and fiddle offer one illustration.5 The phenomenon suggests that American society’s acceptance of music may have been a sensitive or subtle affair, as the difference between the violin and fiddle is often described as the fiddle being a poorly crafted violin or, in some cases, as a different musical style performed on the violin.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing America
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCING AMERICA (PRE-1754) PAGES SAMPLE CHAPTER OVERVIEW PAGES SAMPLE PAGES SAMPLE INTRODUCTION The story of the United States began in Europe, with competition among imperial powers to settle the great landmass of North America. From the 1500s onwards the wealthy but land-strapped kingdoms of Europe – England, France, Spain, Holland and Portugal – became aware of the economic and strategic potential of this bountiful new continent across the Atlantic. Explorers, settlers, conquistadors,1 captains, merchants and speculators braved perilous sea voyages into the unknown to plant their flag in a land they knew little about. By the late 1600s, several European powers had claimed their own piece of North America, leading to territorial competition and nationalist tensions. For a time it seemed as if this ‘new world’ might develop as a mirror of the old, divided Europe. Arguably the strongest of these imperial powers was Great Britain. Britain’s African American slave military strength, naval dominance and mastery of trade gave it the edge in being sold. matters of empire; this was reflected in the claim that ‘Britons … never will be slaves!’2 in the popular anthem Rule, Britannia! The true purpose of British imperialism, however, was not to conquer or rule but to make money. London maintained the colonies as a valuable source of raw materials and a market for manufactured products. Most imperial legislation was therefore concerned with the regulation of trade. By the mid-1760s, British America had evolved into a remarkably independent colonial system. Under a broad policy of ‘salutary A questionable neglect’, each of the thirteen colonies had become used to a significant degree representation of of self-government.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in the Colonies
    CHAPTER 4 Life in the Colonies 4.1 Introduction n 1723, a tired teenager stepped off a boat onto Philadelphia’s Market Street wharf. He was an odd-looking sight. Not having luggage, he had I stuffed his pockets with extra clothes. The young man followed a group of “clean dressed people” into a Quaker meeting house, where he soon fell asleep. The sleeping teenager with the lumpy clothes was Benjamin Franklin. Recently, he had run away from his brother James’s print shop in Boston. When he was 12, Franklin had signed a contract to work for his brother for nine years. But after enduring James’s nasty temper for five years, Franklin packed his pockets and left. In Philadelphia, Franklin quickly found work as a printer’s assistant. Within a few years, he had saved enough money to open his own print shop. His first success was a newspaper called the Pennsylvania Gazette. In 1732, readers of the Gazette saw an advertisement for Poor Richard’s Almanac. An almanac is a book, published annually, that contains information about weather predictions, the times of sunrises and sunsets, planting advice for farmers, and other useful subjects. According to the advertisement, Poor Richard’s Almanac was written by “Richard Saunders” and printed by “B. Franklin.” Nobody knew then that the author and printer were actually the same person. In addition to the usual information contained in almanacs, Franklin mixed in some proverbs, or wise sayings. Several of them are still remembered today. Here are three of the best- known: “A penny saved is a penny earned.” “Early to bed, early to rise, makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise.” “Fish and visitors smell in three days.” Poor Richard’s Almanac sold so well that Franklin was able to retire at age 42.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaving the Mm:J.In to Ply About Lundy, for Securing Trade
    Rep. Lundy Field Soc. 4 7 IN THE SHADOW OF THE BLACK ENSIGN: LUNDY'S PART IN PIRACY By C.G. HARFIELD Flat 4, 23 Upperton Gardens, Eastboume, BN21 2AA Pirates! The word simultaneously conjures images of fear, violence and brutality with evocations of adventure on the high seas, swashbuckling heroes and quests for buried treasure. Furthermore, the combination of pirates and islands excites romantic fascination (Cordingly 1995, 162-6), perhaps founded upon the popular and sanitised anti-heroes of literature such as Long John Silver and Captain Hook (Mitchell discusses how literature has romanticised piracy, 1976, 7-10). This paper aims to discover, as far as possible, the part Lundy had to play in piracy in British waters, and to place that in perspective. The nature of the sources for piracy around Lundy will be discussed elsewhere (Harfield, forthcoming); here the story those sources tell is presented. It is not a story of deep-water pirates who traversed the oceans in search of bullion ships, but rather an illustration of the nature of coastal piracy with the bulk of the evidence coming from the Tudor and Stuart periods. LUNDY AS A LANDMARK IN THE EVIDENCE The majority of references to Lundy and pirates mention the island only as a landmark (Harfield, forthcoming). Royal Navy ships are regularly recorded plying the waters between the Scilly Isles, Lundy and the southern coasts of Wales and Ireland (see fig. I) with the intention of clearing these waters of pirates, both British and foreign. For instance, Captain John Donner encountered English pirates ':fifteen miles distant from Lundy Isle" in April 155 7 (7.3.1568, CSP(D)).
    [Show full text]
  • The Circulating Medium of Exchange in Colonial Pennsylvania, 1729-1775
    The Circulating Medium of Exchange in Colonial Pennsylvania, 1729-1775: * New Estimates of Monetary Composition and Economic Growth Farley Grubb Economics Dept. Univ. of Delaware Newark, DE 19716 USA July 3, 2001 Preliminary Draft Comments Welcome * The author is Professor of Economics, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA. E-mail: [email protected]. The author thanks Peter Coclanis, Joseph Mason, Ronald Michener, and Richard Sylla for helpful suggestions. Anne Pfaelzer de Ortiz provided research and editorial assistance. The Circulating Medium of Exchange in Colonial Pennsylvania, 1729-1775: * New Estimates of Monetary Composition and Economic Growth Market transaction data are used to estimate the composition and quantity of specie in circulation. This estimate is used to provide the first comprehensive measure of the colony's money supply. This estimate, along with data on population and prices, is used to measure the growth in output using the quantity theory of money. Output growth is found to depend on periodization and the extent to which rising commercialization increased the velocity of circulation. Specie was scarce but becoming less so as the Revolution approached, and specie and paper currency were both substitutes and complements depending on the period of analysis. Nobody knows the amount of specie in circulation in colonial America. The absence of this one piece of information has left unanswered a number of important questions about how colonial economies worked. One such question is whether specie was scarce in colonial America. Some writers believe it was scarce (Brock 1975, pp. 86, 267, 386; Bouton 1996; Lester 1938; Walton and Shepard 1979, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Loyalists in War, Americans in Peace: the Reintegration of the Loyalists, 1775-1800
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800 Aaron N. Coleman University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Coleman, Aaron N., "LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800" (2008). University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. 620. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/620 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF DISSERATION Aaron N. Coleman The Graduate School University of Kentucky 2008 LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800 _________________________________________________ ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION _________________________________________________ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky By Aaron N. Coleman Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Daniel Blake Smith, Professor of History Lexington, Kentucky 2008 Copyright © Aaron N. Coleman 2008 iv ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800 After the American Revolution a number of Loyalists, those colonial Americans who remained loyal to England during the War for Independence, did not relocate to the other dominions of the British Empire.
    [Show full text]