Female-Driven Army on Iraq/Iran Border Gets Bombed by the Bush Administration, Snubbed by Anti-War Activists Last Updated May 27, 2007

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Female-Driven Army on Iraq/Iran Border Gets Bombed by the Bush Administration, Snubbed by Anti-War Activists Last Updated May 27, 2007 War Story: Female-driven army on Iraq/Iran border gets bombed by the Bush Administration, snubbed by anti-war activists Last updated May 27, 2007 ost in the debate over Iraq troop pullouts and the carnage of civilians in that country is the murky status of a little known army that has been con- Lfined to base ever since the United States invaded in 2003. The soldiers represent an Iranian opposition group called the Mujahedeen Khalq, or MEK, which has battled the Islamic re- gime across the border for the past 27 years. In what may be a first for modern warfare, about a third of the MEK’s combatants, and some Calm Between the Desert Storms. British author of The Olive Readers Christine 70 percent of its commanders, are Aziz (right) met with members of the Iranian opposition army and their tanks in Iraq in female. Those demographics are 2004. probably not so incredible when you consider that Iranian women With several camps set up along Camp Ashraf, as the compound is have suffered the brunt of perse- the Iran/Iraq border, the opposi- known. Filmed sometime before cution under Sharia Law. That’s tion army’s 300 tanks and experi- the start of the second Gulf War in the draconian penal code imposed ence battling Islamic militants 2003, the video shows platoons of on the nation in 1979 when Islamic could have been deployed to stop young women marching alongside fundamentalists took over in the Al-Qaida and other foreign jihad- their male counterparts in a large chaotic aftermath of a national ists from infiltrating Iraq after the square, with a huge statue of a rebellion that deposed Shah Reza American invasion. lion in the background. Pahlavi. Instead, the Pentagon autho- The CNN segment then cuts to the Even though the MEK helped rized U.S. and British jets to bomb desert to follow the tanks on field overthrow Pahlavi, the group sup- the main MEK compound outside maneuvers. After that, we see ports a return of secular govern- of Baghdad, killing or injuring female recruits performing routine ment to Iran. As a political party, about 50 soldiers out of a force of maintenance on armored vehicles. it opposed the adoption of the 3,800. They’re dressed in khaki trousers Islamic constitution, which led The situation there has been and shirts, combat boots, and the Ayatollah Khomeini to outlaw touch and go ever since. (being Muslims) matching Khaki its members from politics. The headscarves. MEK says tens of thousands of Welcome to Camp Ashraf Through an underground its supporters were executed or network operating within Iran, imprisoned during the years that In April of this year, CNN broad- the MEK first reported the in- followed. cast some exclusive footage of continued stallation of nuclear centrifuges Like the CNN video, the strange discuss arrangements for using in the country a few years ago. scenario that unfolded before the compound. The Iranians sur- The International Atomic Energy Aziz’s eyes seemed like something prised the Americans by serving Agency verified the claim during out of Alice in Wonderland. a chicken dinner. The resistance a surprise inspection, prompting “Ashraf is 14 square miles of movement seemed prepared to ac- the U.N. Security Council to adopt impeccable tidiness,” Aziz re- cept the Americans, but made the sanctions. ported. “The first impression is point it was their compound and Before that, the MEK briefly of a holiday camp rather than a that they eventually expected to grabbed headlines within the military base. Eucalyptus trees line get it back.” Islamic state when it attacked the long driveways, men and women heavily fortified headquarters of tend gardens, and there’s the smell Terrorists or Bargaining Chips the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, of bread from the bakery.” a special military wing controlled The article continued: “Several Since the Iran-Contra scan- by the ayatollahs. weeks after the fall of Saddam, dal in the mid 1980s, successive By early 2003, the opposition the U.S. General Ray Odierno of American administrations have army had consolidated its person- the 4th Infantry division entered either shunned the MEK or acted nel into its two largest camps in Ashraf camp to negotiate the to criminalize it as part of secret Ashraf City. Althought it notified disarming of the NLA [National deals with the Islamic regime the Pentagon of the locations prior Liberation Army - the MEK’s which later became public. to the March 20th invasion, the air armed forces]. He found himself The U.S. State Department went strikes proceeded, and sometime in a room lined with cream Re- so far as to declare the opposition later, the Army’s 4th Infantry ar- gency furniture and Persian rugs, group a “foreign terrorist organi- rived to negotiate a “ceasefire”. drinking coffee from white and zation” in 1997. Officials within The U.S. commanders on scene gold china cups and eating home- the Clinton Administration said noted in their reports that MEK made sweetmeats with a group of the designation was meant to re- soldiers never fired a shot at any female army commanders consid- ward Iran for electing a moderate, Coalition forces. ered to be terrorists by his govern- Mohammad Khatami, as president A year later, British author and ment.” that year. journalist Christine Aziz visited Michael Gordon of the New York Yet Tehran had been implicated the camp to interview the women Times related a similarly cordial just the year before in directing soldiers there. Her article “Tank meeting in June of 2003. “The and financing a group of Hesbol- Girls: The Frontline Feminists”, Spartan Brigade’s commander, lah fighters who bombed Khobar was subsequently published in The Col. David Perkins, met with a Towers in Saudi Arabia. The Independent, a British news journal. woman who is one of the Iranian attack killed 19 U.S. air men and group’s military commanders to injured 400. It seemed an inauspicious time to let bygones be bygones. In 1999, the geopolitics turned positively bizarre when the State Department designated a second Iranian opposition group as a terrorist organization. This time it was the National Council of Re- sistance of Iran (NCRI), a broad- based coalition of Iranian expatri- ate groups who formed an Iranian Parliament in exile in 1985. NCRI President Maryam Rajavi presides over a council of 530 members, not all of whom support the armed resistance at Camp Ashraf. Mrs. Rajavi, who is married to An MEK soldier services an armored vehicle at Camp Ashraf, Iraq. continued MEK leader Massoud Rajavi, says that in the event the MEK were to dislodge the Islamic dictatorship from Iran, she will serve a six- month interim term, followed by Democratic elections. Her hus- band, however, has not been seen since the U.S. invasion. Questioned about the addition of the NCRI to the terrorist list, former Assistant Secretary of State Martin Indyk told Reuters, “The Iranian Government had brought this to our attention. We looked into it and saw that there were good reasons for designating the Photo: NCRI NCR[I] as an alias for the MEK.” President Maryam Rajavi of the National Council of Resisance for Iran (center) arriving The admission that a hostile at the Council of Europe in April of 2006. foreign government long associ- incident, suddenly found herself ated with terrorism itself was now or People’s Mujahhedin, a major shackled and led away along shaping American policy prompt- group opposing the Iranian gov- with 167 other Iranian dissidents. ed U.S. Congress people on both ernment.” In return, it’s alleged Among those detained, Moham- sides of the aisle to scratch their that Iran agreed to secure the bor- mad Mohaddessin, the group’s heads in amazement. Nearly 200 der and turn over any Iraqi troops foreign affairs spokesman, de- representatives have signed onto attempting to flee the jurisdiction. scribed the raid afterwards as a petitions asking for the terrorist Relations between Tehran and gigantic publicity stunt aimed at designation of both the MEK and Washington cooled in 2004. Af- helping French corporations get NCRI to be revoked. ter an 18-month review by the contracts in Iran. However, it wasn’t until Ameri- F.B.I. and other federal agencies There were enough police, he can legal and human rights or- found no links to terrorism among told the Wall Street Journal, “for a ganizations that interact with the any MEK soldier living at Camp coup in an African country.” NCRI filed a lawsuit that a judge Ashraf, the U.S. Central Com- A search of the group’s head- revoked its terror tag. mand announced that it would quarters did not turn up any Secretary of State Colin Pow- comply with a determination by evidence to support the CIA’s ell ignored that ruling two years the International Committee of claim of imminent terrorist attacks later when he ordered the arrest the Red Cross that the MEK was a in Europe or anywhere else, and a of the group’s representatives legitimate party to a civil war. The judge ordered Mrs. Rajavi released in Washington and Los Ange- ICRC - and more recently, the U.N. from jail. (The other detainees les, along with the freezing of its High Commissioner on Refugees were freed shortly after the raid.) assets. While subsequent litiga- – has stipulated that the Geneva At this point, American news tion reversed those actions, seven Conventions preclude the expul- organizations began investigating Iranian American fundraisers are sion of the MEK from Iraq or its the phenomenon of a War on Ter- currently in jail awaiting trial on forcible repatriation back to Iran.
Recommended publications
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 1.19
    Tuesday Volume 618 20 December 2016 No. 85 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 20 December 2016 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2016 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1291 20 DECEMBER 2016 1292 Heidi Alexander (Lewisham East) (Lab): In a year House of Commons when the Health Secretary has spent quite a lot of time knocking clinicians, it is good to hear him speak so positively about them. After four years in the job, what Tuesday 20 December 2016 responsibility does he accept for the lack of suitably qualified individuals—not just clinicians—who are prepared The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock to take on the top jobs in the NHS on a permanent basis? PRAYERS Mr Hunt: I will tell the hon. Lady what I take responsibility for: more doctors, more nurses and more funding than ever before in the history of the NHS. We [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] know that the highest standards are often achieved when there is strong clinical leadership. Only 54% of managers in this country are clinicians, compared with Oral Answers to Questions 74% in Canada and 94% in Sweden. That is why it is right that we do everything we can to encourage more clinicians into leadership roles. HEALTH Andrew Selous (South West Bedfordshire) (Con): Does the Secretary of State agree that the clinical leadership involved in the Getting It Right First Time initiative is The Secretary of State was asked— important, not only because it will save £1.5 billion, Clinical Leadership which could be put back into patient care, but because patients will be in less pain and will end up having fewer revision operations, and some will even survive treatment 1.
    [Show full text]
  • IRAN COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service
    IRAN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service Date 28 June 2011 IRAN JUNE 2011 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN IRAN FROM 14 MAY TO 21 JUNE Useful news sources for further information REPORTS ON IRAN PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 14 MAY AND 21 JUNE Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Maps ...................................................................................................................... 1.04 Iran ..................................................................................................................... 1.04 Tehran ................................................................................................................ 1.05 Calendar ................................................................................................................ 1.06 Public holidays ................................................................................................... 1.07 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 3.01 Pre 1979: Rule of the Shah .................................................................................. 3.01 From 1979 to 1999: Islamic Revolution to first local government elections ... 3.04 From 2000 to 2008: Parliamentary elections
    [Show full text]
  • What Do Iranians Think of the MEK?
    Volume 3 Numbers 32&33 Date: Feb/Mar 2019 What do Iranians think of the MEK? Ali Alavi March 03 2019: Reporters who talk about the MEK usually want to talk about the politics and the money. They say, for example, that John Bolton supports them, that they get Inside this issue: money from Saudi Arabia, that they want regime change in Iran. What do Iranians think of the 1 Sometimes these reporters even mention Iranians. MEK? IT’S A MISTAKE TO 2, 3 When they do, they say the MEK doesn’t have much support in Iran be- TREAT THE MEK AS A cause of siding with Saddam Hussein in the war that ended in 1988. NORMAL OPPOSITION That’s all. GROUP Female Defectors Of The 3 Maybe they don’t say anything else because they don’t know anything MKO (MEK) In EU Parlia- else. ment. March 8th THE SPECIAL MOMENT 4, 5 Maybe they don’t care what Iranians think of the MEK because they are TO SAY NO TO THE too busy talking about what America wants and what Europe wants from CULT OF RAJAVI (MEK, NCRI, …) Iran. THE MOJAHEDIN-E 6, 7, Iranians have a lot to say about the MEK. KHALQ AREN’T AMERI- 8, 9 CA’S FRIENDS. EVEN IRANIANS WHO HATE Not just inside Iran. THE REGIME DON’T WANT MEK Not just ex-members. INTERNATIONAL LIBER- 10, TY ASSOCIATION, 11 The Iranian opposition outside Iran has its own view of the MEK. MEK’S SO-CALLED CHARITY BREACHES Let’s hear more from Iranians about the MEK.
    [Show full text]
  • Íránská Opozice Za Vlády Mahmúda Ahmadínežáda Případová Studie Národní Rady Íránského Odporu
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA FAKULTA SOCIÁLNÍCH STUDIÍ Katedra mezinárodních vztahů a evropských studií Obor: Mezinárodní vztahy Íránská opozice za vlády Mahmúda Ahmadínežáda Případová studie Národní rady íránského odporu Bakalářská práce Karolína Pawlusová Vedoucí práce: PhDr. Pavel Pšeja, Ph.D UČO: 416684 Obor: MV Imatrikulační ročník: 2012 Brno, 2016 Čestné prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem bakalářskou práci Íránská opozice za Ahmadínežáda: Případová studie Národní rady íránského odporu vypracovala samostatně za použití uvedených zdrojů. V Brně, 18. 12. 2016 …………………………………. Karolína Pawlusová Poděkování Tímto bych chtěla poděkovat PhDr. Pavlu Pšejovi, Ph.D za odborné rady, trpělivost a vstřícný osobní přístup během konzultací. Anotace Tato bakalářská práce se zabývá íránskou opozicí, konkrétně Národní radou íránského odporu. Cílem práce je zjistit, jakým způsobem probíhala interakce mezi touto organizací a íránským režimem za Ahmadínežádova prezidentství. První část práce je věnována popisu íránského režimu a identifikování základních konfliktů zájmů a hodnot. Na základě Hlaváčkovy definice a typologie opozice v nedemokratických režimech je pak v druhé části Národní rada íránského odporu analyzována ze čtyř různých úhlů, a to v širším kontextu existující íránské opozice let 2005 – 2013. Klíčová slova Írán, NCRI, MKO, MEK, PMOI, Národní rada íránského odporu, Lidoví Mudžahedíni, Ahmadínežád, Rajavi, Nedemokratické režimy, Opozice. Abstract This Bachelor’s thesis handles the Iranian opposition, in more particular the National Council of Resistance of Iran. The goal of this Study is to ascertain in which way the interaction between this organization and the Iranian regime during Ahmadinejad’s Presidency takes place. The first part of the Study is dedicated to describing the Iranian regime and identifying the basic conflicts of values and interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Weapons of Mass Destruction
    - IRANIAN WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION: THE BROADER STRATEGIC CONTEXT Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy And Adam C. Seitz [email protected] [email protected] Working Draft for Review and Comments: December 5, 2008 Cordesman and Seitz: Iranian Weapons of Mass Destruction 12/8/08 Page ii Table of Contents THE STRATEGIC CONTEXT .................................................................................................................. 1 IRAN‘S CONVENTIONAL AND ASYMMETRIC FORCES .................................................................................. 2 THE IMPACT OF WEAK AND AGING CONVENTIONAL FORCES ..................................................................... 4 The Lingering Impact of Past Defeats .................................................................................................. 4 Resources: The Causes of Iranian Weakness ....................................................................................... 5 Iran and the Regional Conventional Balance ......................................................................................13 IRAN‘S OPTIONS FOR ASYMMETRIC WARFARE ..........................................................................................32 THE INTERACTION BETWEEN WMDS, CONVENTIONAL FORCES, AND FORCES FOR ASYMMETRICAL WARFARE ..................................................................................................................................................32 IRAN‘S ASYMMETRIC WARFIGHTING CAPABILITIES (REAL AND POTENTIAL) ...........................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Free Iran World Summit 2021: the Democratic Alternative on the March to Victory
    Free Iran World Summit 2021: The Democratic Alternative on the March to Victory Maryam Rajavi President-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) Maryam Rajavi’s Ten-Point Plan for the Future of Iran JUNE 2020 1. Rejection of velayat-e faqih (absolute clerical rule). Affirmation of the people’s sovereignty in a republic founded on universal suffrage and pluralism; 2. Freedom of speech, freedom of political parties, freedom of assembly, freedom of the press and the internet. Dissolution and disbanding of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the terrorist Qods Force, plainclothes groups, the unpopular Bassij, the Ministry of Intelligence, Council of the Cultural Revolution, and all suppressive patrols and institutions in cities, villages, schools, universities, offices, and factories; 3. Commitment to individual and social freedoms and rights in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Disbanding all agencies in charge of censorship and inquisition. Seeking justice for massacred political prisoners, prohibition of torture, and the abolishment of the death penalty; 4. Separation of religion and state, and freedom of religions and faiths; 5. Complete gender equality in the realms of political, social, cultural, and economic rights, and equal participation of women in political leadership. Abolishment of any form of discrimination; the right to choose one’s own clothing freely; the right to freely marry and divorce, and to obtain education and employment. Prohibition of all forms of exploitation against women under any pretext; 6. An independent judiciary and legal system consistent with international standards based on the presumption of innocence, the right to defense counsel, right of appeal, and the right to be tried in a public court.
    [Show full text]
  • JAN 2018 Part A.Pdf
    Page | 1 CBRNE-TERRORISM NEWSLETTER – January 2018 www.cbrne-terrorism-newsletter.com Page | 2 CBRNE-TERRORISM NEWSLETTER – January 2018 CBRNE-Terrorism Newsletter – 2018© January 2018 Website: www.cbrne-terrorism-newsletter.com Editor-in-Chief BrigGEN (ret) Ioannis Galatas MD, MA, MC (Army) PhD cand Consultant in Allergy & Clinical Immunology Medical/Hospital CBRNE Planner & Instructor Senior Asymmetric Threats Analyst Manager, CBRN Knowledge Center @ International CBRNE Institute (BE) Athens, Greece Contact e-mail: [email protected] Editorial Team Bellanca Giada, MD, MSc (Italy) Hopmeier Michael, BSc/MSc MechEngin (USA) Kiourktsoglou George, BSc, Dipl, MSc, MBA, PhD (cand) (UK) Photiou Steve, MD, MSc EmDisaster (Italy) Tarlow Peter, PhD Sociol (USA) Advertise with us! CBRNE-Terrorism Newsletter is published on-line monthly and distributed free of charge. Sponsors of the International CBRNE Institute can advertise for free. CBRNE related companies: negotiable (very low) fees upon request. PUBLISHER Mendor Editions S.A. 3 Selinountos Street 14231 Nea Ionia Athens, Greece Tel: +30 210 2723094/-5 Fax: +30 210 2723698 Contact e-mail: Valia Kalantzi [email protected] DISCLAIMER: The CBRNE-Terrorism Newsletter® is a free online publication for the fellow civilian/military First Responders worldwide. The Newsletter is a collection of papers/articles related to the stated thematology. Relevant sources/authors are included and all info provided herein is from open Internet sources. Opinions and comments from the Editor, the Editorial group or the authors publishing in the Newsletter do not necessarily represent those of the Publisher or the IPW-Group. www.cbrne-terrorism-newsletter.com Page | 3 CBRNE-TERRORISM NEWSLETTER – January 2018 CBRNE-Terrorism Newsletter is: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy
    Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs August 14, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32048 Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy Summary Since the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, a priority of U.S. policy has been to reduce the perceived threat posed by Iran to a broad range of U.S. interests, including the security of the Persian Gulf region. In 2014, a common adversary emerged in the form of the Islamic State organization, reducing gaps in U.S. and Iranian regional interests, although the two countries have often differing approaches over how to try to defeat the group. The finalization on July 14, 2015, of a “Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action” (JCPOA) between Iran and six negotiating powers could enhance Iran’s ability to counter the United States and its allies in the region, but could also pave the way for cooperation to resolve some of the region’s several conflicts. During the 1980s and 1990s, U.S. officials identified Iran’s support for militant Middle East groups as a significant threat to U.S. interests and allies. A perceived potential threat from Iran’s nuclear program emerged in 2002, and the United States orchestrated broad international economic pressure on Iran to try to ensure that the program is verifiably confined to purely peaceful purposes. The international pressure contributed to the June 2013 election as president of Iran of the relatively moderate Hassan Rouhani, who campaigned as an advocate of ending Iran’s international isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mujahedin-E Khalq in Iraq: a Policy Conundrum
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. The Mujahedin-e Khalq in Iraq A Policy Conundrum Jeremiah Goulka, Lydia Hansell, Elizabeth Wilke, Judith Larson Sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense Approved for public release; distribution unlimited NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE The research described in this report was prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD).
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Country Fact Sheet
    Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/Country Fact... Français Home Contact Us Help Search canada.gc.ca Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets Home Country Fact Sheet IRAN December 2007 Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Research Directorate of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada on the basis of publicly available information, analysis and comment. All sources are cited. This document is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed or conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. For further information on current developments, please contact the Research Directorate. Table of Contents 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 2. POLITICAL BACKGROUND 3. POLITICAL PARTIES 4. ARMED GROUPS 5. FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS ENDNOTES REFERENCES 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Official name Islamic Republic of Iran (Jomhori-e Islami-e Irân). Geography Iran is in western Asia, in the Middle East. It is bordered by Turkey and Iraq to the west and Afghanistan and Pakistan to the east; it is bordered by the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman to the south and Armenia, Azerbaijan, the Caspian Sea and Turkmenistan to the north. The country’s total 1 of 18 9/17/2013 7:52 AM Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/Country Fact... area is 1.65 million km2. Iran’s climate is mostly arid and semi-arid, with a humid rainforest zone along the Caspian coast.
    [Show full text]
  • CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
    Order Code IB93033 CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iran: Current Developments and U.S. Policy Updated June 26, 2003 Kenneth Katzman Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Regime Power Struggle and the Opposition Exiled Oppositionists Iran’s Strategic Capabilities Conventional Weapons Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Nuclear Program Chemical and Biological Weapons Missiles Iranian Foreign Policy and Involvement in Terrorism Persian Gulf Saudi Arabia/Khobar Towers Gulf Islands Dispute With UAE Iraq Middle East/North Africa Lebanon/Hizballah Sudan Central and South Asia/Azerbaijan/Former Yugoslavia Al Qaeda/Afghanistan/Pakistan Former Yugoslavia Human Rights Concerns Religious Persecution Trial of 13 Jews U.S.-Iran Relations and Sanctions Possibility of Military Action Economic Sanctions Terrorism/Foreign Aid Proliferation Sanctions Counternarcotics Trade Ban The Iran-Libya Sanctions Act (ILSA) Caspian/Central Asian Energy Routes Through Iran Europe and Japan’s Relations With/Lending to Iran Multilateral Lending to Iran WTO Travel Sanctions Assets Disputes/Victims of Terrorism IB93033 06-26-03 Iran: Current Developments and U.S. Policy SUMMARY The Bush Administration is re-evaluating Another U.S. concern has been Iran’s policy toward Iran. During the late 1990s, opposition to the U.S.-led Middle East peace signs of moderation in Iran had stimulated the process since its inception in October 1991. United States to try to engage Iran in broad, Iran continues to provide material support to official talks. Relations took another Hizballah in Lebanon and to Palestinian downturn when Iran was grouped with North groups that oppose the Arab-Israeli peace Korea and Iraq as part of the “axis of evil” process, such as Hamas and Palestinian Is- identified in President Bush’s January 29, lamic Jihad.
    [Show full text]
  • IPC: US Policy Options for Iran and Iranian Political
    Iran Policy Committee ________________________________________________ 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 202- 742 - 6517 (o); 202-742-6501 (f); [email protected] www.iranpolicy.org White Paper U.S. Policy Options for Iran and Iranian Political Opposition 13 September 2005 Table of Contents Executive Summary Chapter One: Iran in the Global War on Terrorism and Proliferation Introduction Role in the War on Terrorism and Proliferation Globalists vs. Regionalists in the War for Washington Islamist Export of Revolution via Terrorism Iraq Al Qaeda Regional Instability: Israel, Iraq, Levant, Gulf MEK Capabilities in Comparison with those of Other Groups Active Proliferator of Weapons of Mass Destruction Conclusions Chapter Two: The Case for Removal of the Mujahedeen-e Khalq (MEK) from the U.S. State Department Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO) List Introduction Legal Criteria for FTO Designation Allegations against the MEK Killing of Americans Support for the U.S. Embassy Takeover Suppression of Kurds Cross-Border Attacks and Assassinations Terrorist Capability and/or Intent Accusation of “Cult” Conclusions: Legal Allegations Background on the MEK The MEK’s Relationship with the U.S. Military in Iraq The MEK relationship with Iraqis MEK Capabilities Delisting the MEK Serves U.S. National Security Interests Conclusions 2 Appendix Documents Appendix A: Methodology and Content Analysis of Iranian Opposition Groups Appendix B: US-MEK Interaction After the 2003 War in Iraq A) US says Iran opposition in Iraq agrees
    [Show full text]