DOCSLIB.ORG

State of the English Cities (Volume 1)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

State of the English Cities 1 Volume State of the English Cities Volume 1 Price £60 (two volumes not to be sold separately) State of the English Cities A Research Study Volume 1 Authors Professor Michael Parkinson, European Institute for Urban Affairs, Liverpool John Moores University Professor Tony Champion, University of Newcastle Professor James Simmie, Oxford Brookes University Professor Ivan Turok, University of Glasgow Martin Crookston, Llewelyn Davies Yeang Bruce Katz, The Brookings Institution Alison Park, National Centre for Social Research with Alan Berube, The Brookings Institution Professor Mike Coombes, University of Newcastle Professor Danny Dorling, University of Sheffield Richard Evans, European Institute for Urban Affairs, Liverpool John Moores University Norman Glass, National Centre for Social Research Mary Hutchins, European Institute for Urban Affairs, Liverpool John Moores University Professor Ade Kearns, University of Glasgow Professor Ron Martin, University of Cambridge Professor Peter Wood, University College London March 2006 Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: London Photographic Acknowledgements: Images reproduced by kind permission of: Top left: Trams in Nottingham, Nottingham City Council Centre right: Couple on sofa, Newcastle Gateway Initiative Bottom left: Manchester Millennium Quarter, Manchester City Centre Management Co. Ltd The findings and recommendations in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of proposed policies of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone 020 7944 4400 Web site www.odpm.gov.uk © Crown Copyright 2006 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. For any other use of this material, please write to HMSO Licensing, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected]. Further copies of this publication are available from: ODPM Publications PO Box 236 Wetherby West Yorkshire LS23 7NB Tel: 0870 1226 236 Fax: 0870 1226 237 Textphone: 0870 120 7405 E-mail: [email protected] This document is also available on the ODPM website. Printed in the UK on material containing 75% post-consumer waste and 25% ECF pulp ISBN: 10 1-851128-45-X 13 978185112845-7 Reference No: 05 HC 03595/1 Contents Volume 1 Page no. Acknowledgements 4 Foreword 5 Section 1 Places Matter Chapter 1 Towards a new urban agenda 9 Chapter 2 Evaluating policy for English cities 14 Section 2 Processes, places and people Chapter 3 The demographic shape of urban England 33 Chapter 4 The competitive economic performance of English cities 65 Chapter 5 Social cohesion in English cities 109 Chapter 6 Liveability in English cities 155 Chapter 7 Public attitudes in English cities 178 Chapter 8 English cities in an international context 204 References 245 Glossary 263 Volume 2 Acknowledgements 4 Foreword 5 Section 3 Policies – helping or hindering? Chapter 9 Have policies made cities more socially cohesive and liveable? 7 Chapter 10 Have policies made cities more competitive? 37 Chapter 11 Have policies made cities better governed? 67 Chapter 12 Policies on the ground 95 Section 4 Positions and prospects Chapter 13 English cities: picking up, catching up, staying up? 111 Chapter 14 Policies for cities – what's next? 133 Appendix 1 State of the Cities database current indicators 151 Appendix 2 Primary urban areas by local authority district 155 References 161 Glossary 177 State of the English Cities: A Research Study Acknowledgements This project would not have been possible without the sustained help and support from a wide range of colleagues. In particular we would like to acknowledge the invaluable contributions made by the following: The members of our research teams: Jay Karecha, Richard Meegan, Jean Parry (European Institute for Urban Affairs, Liverpool John Moores University), Juliet Carpenter, Andrew Chadwick (Oxford Brookes University), Dimitris Ballas, John Pritchard, Bethan Thomas (University of Sheffield), Joanne Abbots, Dave Fitch, John Flint, Carol McKenzie (University of Glasgow), Mark Johnson, Miranda Phillips (National Centre for Social Research), Peter O’Brien (Llewellyn Davies) Colleagues in the SOCR project team at the ODPM: Greg Clark, Rachel Conner, Joanna Disson, Sarah Fielder, Christine Gough, Mark Kleinman, David Lunts, Angela Ruotolo, Keith Thorpe. The members of the SOCR Project Advisory Group: Joan Bailey, Jon Bright, Greg Clark, Sarah Fielder, Christine Gough, Paul Hildreth, Michael Kell, Mark Kleinman, Jacky Moran, Keith Thorpe (ODPM), Jacob Nell, Simon Ridley (HMT), Maria Kenyon (DTI, Small Business Service), Peter Bunn, Paul Steeples (DTI), Angelina Cannizzaro (DWP), James Shaw, John Shaw (DfES), Vanessa Brand (DCMS), Sue Woddington (DfID), Barbara Noble (DfT), David Lunts (Greater London Authority), Robin Benn (Scottish Executive), Bob Kerslake (Sheffield City Council), Lin Homer (Birmingham City Council), Alan Clarke (One North East), Eamonn Boylan (Manchester City Council), Richard Williamson (GOSW), Manny Lewis (LDA), Graham Garbutt (GOWM), Hazel Baird (CRE), Chris Brown (AMEC/Igloo), Roger Madelin (Argent), Tony Hawkhead (Groundwork), Trevor Beattie (English Partnerships), Joanna Averley (CABE), Derek Long (Housing Corporation), Geoff Mulgan (Institute of Community Studies), Lesley Chalmers (English Cities Fund), Alistair Parker (Cushman & Wakefield Healey & Baker), Rosemary Feenan (Jones Lang LaSalle), Dermot Finch (IPPR). The very many colleagues across the country who gave us their time and views from a range of institutions, especially in the cities of: Birmingham, Bristol, Burnley, Cambridge, Derby, Leeds, Leicester, London, Manchester, Medway, Sheffield, Sunderland. We are immensely grateful to all of them. 4 Foreword This independent report to Government fulfils our commitment to publish a detailed update on the urban renaissance, 5 years after the Urban White Paper. Since then, there's been remarkable progress in creating sustainable communities in our major towns and cities. We do not underestimate the scale of the challenges which remain. But the clear message of this Report is that our cities are very much back in business as more successful places to live, work and enjoy. They are engines of growth once again. After years of industrial change, our cities are competing more effectively in a rapidly changing global economy in which capital, goods and knowledge travel faster than ever before. Old industrial assets like the canals and waterways have been transformed into attractive places to live and work. People and jobs are coming back into our city centres – in many ways thanks to our planning policies which require retailers and developers to use brownfield sites before green fields. Overall, a combination of sustained economic growth, increased investment through public private partnerships, and entrepreneurial local leadership means that our cities are better placed than at any time for a century or more. After 8 years of economic growth, sustained investment, and local leadership, our cities are more confident than they've been for decades. But we recognise the need to continue to develop and improve. The economic and social gains of urban renewal need to be shared and sustained. This Report provides an analysis – unprecedented in its scope and detail – of how our cities stand and they could improve. It offers detailed ideas for change to which the Government will respond. The Government is determined to work with local people, businesses, local government and other stakeholders to seize the best opportunities for cities they have enjoyed for 100 years. John Prescott Rt Hon David Miliband Deputy Prime Minister Minister of Communities and Local Government 5 State of the English Cities: A Research Study 6 Section 1 Places Matter Page no. Chapter 1 Towards a new urban agenda 9 Introduction 9 Cities matter globally 9 Some key messages from the report 11 Chapter 2 Evaluating policy for English cities 14 Introduction 14 The changing landscape of policy for English cities 14 The Methodology of the State of the English Cities Report 22 The structure of the report 27 Chapter 1: Towards a new urban agenda 1. Introduction 1.1.1 In its Urban White Paper of 2000, Towards an Urban Renaissance, the Government made a commitment to commission a report on the progress and performance of English cities in the last five years. This State of the Cities report to government by a consortium of research organisations fulfils that commitment. It provides a comprehensive assessment of urban conditions and drivers of urban change in England. It reviews the impact of government policies upon cities, explores how they contribute to local, regional and national success and identifies key policy messages. Its four main themes, which reflect current government policy ambitions as well as much academic analysis of urban performance are – social cohesion; economic competitiveness and performance; liveability and governance. 1.1.2 This report is based on a series of reports prepared by the team, which contain a much richer mix of evidence, opinions
Recommended publications
  • London Clerical Workers 1880-1914: the Search for Stability

    London Clerical Workers 1880-1914: the Search for Stability

    London Clerical Workers 1880-1914: The Search For Stability By Michael Heller (University College London, University of London) Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in July 2003 UMI Number: U602595 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U602595 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Contents Abstract............................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements........................................................................................... 4 Introduction................................................................................................ 5 Chapters: 1. A Definition of the Late Victorian and Edwardian London........ Clerk35 2. Work, Income, Promotion and Stability.................................................68 3. The Clerk, the Office and Work............................................................108 4. Attitudes of the Clerk towards Work.....................................................142
  • Hotel Needs Assessment

    Hotel Needs Assessment

    GVA RGA FINAL GVA 10 Stratton Street London W1J 8JR Hotel Needs Assessment Preston, Lancashire Prepared for: Preston City Council April 2013 Preston City Council Contents Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 6 3. PRESTON MARKET OVERVIEW........................................................................................................... 12 4. PRESTON HOTEL SUPPLY..................................................................................................................... 27 5. PRIMARY DEMAND RESEARCH ......................................................................................................... 38 6. PRESTON HOTEL PERFORMANCE ..................................................................................................... 43 7. HOTEL BENCHMARKING APPRAISAL................................................................................................ 48 8. HOTEL OPERATOR CONTEXT ............................................................................................................. 55 9. HOTEL DEVELOPMENT APPRAISAL ................................................................................................... 60 10. APPENDIX 1.........................................................................................................................................
  • The History of Transport Systems in the UK

    The History of Transport Systems in the UK

    The history of transport systems in the UK Future of Mobility: Evidence Review Foresight, Government Office for Science The history of transport systems in the UK Professor Simon Gunn Centre for Urban History, University of Leicester December 2018 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr Aaron Andrews for his help with the research for this review, especially for creating the graphs, and Georgina Lockton for editing. The review has benefited from the input of an Advisory Group consisting of Professor Colin Divall (University of York); Professor Gordon Pirie (University of Cape Town); Professor Colin Pooley (Lancaster University); Professor Geoff Vigar (University of Newcastle). I thank them all for taking time to read the review at short notice and enabling me to draw on their specialist expertise. Any errors remaining are, of course, mine. This review has been commissioned as part of the UK government’s Foresight Future of Mobility project. The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent those of any government or organisation. This document is not a statement of government policy. This report has an information cut-off date of February 2018. The history of transport systems in the UK Executive summary The purpose of this review is to summarise the major changes affecting transport systems in the UK over the last 100 years. It is designed to enable the Foresight team to bring relevant historical knowledge to bear on the future of transport and mobility. The review analyses four aspects of transport and mobility across the twentieth century. The first section identifies significant points of change in the main transport modes.
  • The Great British Brain Drain an Analysis of Migration to and from Newcastle

    The Great British Brain Drain an Analysis of Migration to and from Newcastle

    The great British brain drain An analysis of migration to and from Newcastle March 2017 Introduction The economic performance of UK cities is increasingly dependent on the skills of their workforce. Cities across the UK face the challenge of both attracting and retaining high-skilled talent. The Great British Brain Drain investigates migration within the UK, specifically between cities.1 It finds that migrants tend to be younger and more highly-skilled than the population overall. Looking specifically at graduate migration, many university cities lose some of their graduates to London and this movement is especially strong for the highest performing graduates with 2.1 or 1st class degrees from Russell Group universities. Despite this, most university cities experience a ‘graduate gain’; they gain more graduates than they lose. This is because the majority of movements to and from cities consist of students moving to a new city for university, and then moving again for work, with over half of all graduates following this pattern. This briefing is a complementary piece of analysis to the main report, in which we look in detail at the nature of migration and graduate mobility to and from Newcastle. Firstly, it looks at overall migration patterns into and out of Newcastle. Secondly, it looks specifically at the movements of students and new graduates. Finally, it looks at the new graduate labour market in the city. Centre for Cities uses the Primary Urban Area (PUA) definition of cities. For Newcastle this comprises of Gateshead, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, North Tyneside and South Tyneside local authorities. For more information visit: www.centreforcities.org/puas.
  • The Impact of Population Change and Demography on Future Infrastructure Demand

    The Impact of Population Change and Demography on Future Infrastructure Demand

    THE IMPACT OF POPULATION CHANGE AND DEMOGRAPHY ON FUTURE INFRASTRUCTURE DEMAND NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE COMMISSION National Infrastructure Commission report | The impact of population change and demography on future infrastructure demand CONTENTS Introduction 3 1. How population affects the demand for infrastructure services 4 2. How many people will there be? 8 3. Where will people live? 13 4. Age, household size and behaviour change 18 5. Feedback from infrastructure to the population 22 6. Conclusion 25 References 27 2 National Infrastructure Commission report | The impact of population change and demography on future infrastructure demand INTRODUCTION The National Infrastructure Commission has been tasked with putting together a National Infrastructure Assessment once a Parliament. This discussion paper, focused on population and demography, forms part of a series looking at the drivers of future infrastructure supply and demand in the UK. Its conclusions are designed to aid the Commission in putting together plausible scenarios out to 2050. The National Infrastructure Assessment will analyse the UK’s long-term economic infrastructure needs, outline a strategic vision over a 30-year time horizon and set out recommendations for how identified needs should begin to be met. It will cover transport, digital, energy, water and wastewater, flood risk and solid waste, assessing the infrastructure system as a whole. It will look across sectors, identifying and exploring the most important interdependencies. This raises significant forecasting challenges. The Assessment will consider a range of scenarios to help understand how the UK’s infrastructure requirements could change in response to different assumptions about the future. Scenarios are a widely-used approach to addressing uncertainty.
  • 1 Hull City Council Fair Funding Needs Review Consultation

    1 Hull City Council Fair Funding Needs Review Consultation

    Hull City Council Fair Funding Needs Review Consultation Response Hull City Council’s responses to the individual questions are attached at Annex A. The narrative below sets out the factors the Council sees as key to both the Needs and Resources elements of any system of Fair Funding for Local Government. In recent years the city has been very successful in drawing in additional investment into the City. Hull has experienced its highest ever levels of public and private sector investment, with developments totalling £1bn now being delivered in the city. The Council has invested in a £100m ‘destination Hull’ programme which has begun to transform city centre streets, public spaces and cultural venues, setting the stage for a spectacular cultural programme for the city’s year as City of Culture in 2017. The work will also ensure Hull secures a lasting legacy from its year in the spotlight in the shape of increased participation in the arts, a strengthened cultural economy and a regenerated and vibrant city. Specifically the Council is funding investment in the public realm within the City Centre, major refurbishment of the New Theatre and Ferens Art Gallery as well as a new conference/music venue However, despite this recent economic success, the city still faces economic and social challenges engrained through 30 years of economic ‘stagnation’ which present themselves through the city’s position in the Indices of Multiple Deprivation. Income levels, child poverty and health related challenges persist and those distanced from work, in the longer term, measured through Employment Support Allowance / Incapacity Benefit are at 9.5%, the highest on record.
  • Why the Industrial Revolution Was British: Commerce, Induced Invention, and the Scientific Revolution Author(S): R

    Why the Industrial Revolution Was British: Commerce, Induced Invention, and the Scientific Revolution Author(S): R

    Why the industrial revolution was British: commerce, induced invention, and the scientific revolution Author(s): R. C. ALLEN Source: The Economic History Review, Vol. 64, No. 2 (MAY 2011), pp. 357-384 Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Economic History Society Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41262428 Accessed: 29-10-2018 16:15 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Economic History Society, Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Economic History Review This content downloaded from 168.122.222.242 on Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:15:11 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Economie History Review, 64, 2 (2011), pp. 357-384 Why the industrial revolution was British: commerce, induced invention, and the scientific revolution1 By R. C. ALLEN Britain had a unique wage and price structure in the eighteenth century, and that structure is a key to explaining the inventions of the industrial revolution. British wages were very high by international standards, and energy was very cheap. This configuration led British firms to invent technologies that substituted capital and energy for labour. High wages also increased the supply of technology by enabling British people to acquire education and training.
  • The Impact of the English Civil War on the Economy of London, 1642-1650, by Ben Coates

    The Impact of the English Civil War on the Economy of London, 1642-1650, by Ben Coates

    The Impact of the English Civil War on the Economy of London, 1642-1650, by Ben Coates. Abstract. The purpose of this thesis is to ask to what extent and in what ways the economy of London was affected by the English Civil War. This w ill be placed in the context of the evolution o f London’s economy and society in the 16th and 17th centuries. Comparisons with the impact of the C ivil War on the economy of other parts of England will be made. The focus w ill be on the short term effects of the C ivil War. In the first part of thesis the impact on the economy of London of Parliamentary taxation, loans and contracts for Parliament’s war effort w ill be assessed, as well as the policies of economic blockade pursued by the belligerents. Subsequently the impact of disruption brought about by the English C ivil War on the major props of the London economy w ill be examined, namely London’s role in the internal and external trades of England, and manufacturing in London. It w ill be argued that the C ivil War caused a major economic crisis in London partly because the economy of the metropolis rested on its interrelationship with the test of England, and also because of its function as the capital as the centre for the social and economic networks of the kingdom. The Civil War disrupted those networks. However the impact of the war was limited because the disruption of the national economic networks was partial, and because different aspects were disrupted at different times.
  • Cities Outlook 1901 Sheffield, C1900

    Cities Outlook 1901 Sheffield, C1900

    Cities Outlook 1901 Sheffield, c1900. Copyright The Francis Frith Collection. Front cover photographs: Birmingham, 1890, Sunderland, 1900 & York, 1908. Copyright The Francis Frith Collection. Cities Outlook 1901 by Naomi Clayton & Raj Mandair 00 Cities Outlook 1901: Summary 4 01 Introduction: Lessons from history 7 02 Cities Outlook 1901: Historic urban Britain 10 03 From 20th to 21st century: Urban growth and decline 36 04 Future cities: Lessons for policy 51 Acknowledgements The Centre for Cities would like to thank the Heritage Lottery Fund for their support of Cities Outlook 1901. All views expressed are those of Centre for Cities. Centre for Cities Cities Outlook 1901 Cities Outlook 1901: Summary A city’s economic past has a profound influence on its future. Current geographical differences across the UK can be traced back not just decades but a century or more. The majority of economic differences between The 20th century was marked by two major urban cities can be attributed to a complex range of changes: the north to south shift and the coastal internal and external factors, rather than to policy to inland shift. Cities in the Industrial North, which decisions. The implications of the shift away from depended much more on manufacturing, experienced manufacturing towards services provides much of the rising unemployment as their core industries restructured explanation for why cities such as Blackburn and Hull and fewer jobs were required. Port cities saw their 4 experience continued economic decline while others such competitive advantage decline as alternative modes of as London and Cambridge have seen rising prosperity. transport were developed and manufacturing declined.
  • 2016 Research Note: 'Brexit and Real Estate'

    2016 Research Note: 'Brexit and Real Estate'

    OAK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP JUNE (2) 2016 Brexit and Real Estate If General de Gaulle had not lost a popular referendum in France in 1969 (by a margin of 52/48) maybe the Britain would not have been admitted finally into the EEC in 1973. Britain had tried to join twice in 1963 and 1967. De Gaulle sensed with his intimate knowledge of the British from his wartime sojourn in London and North Africa that they could not belong to his vision for European co-operation. Maybe it was their merchant- nature, their pragmatism or their ruthlessness. Certainly, all of these characteristics were on display when the UK voted to leave the European Union on 23rd June 2016. Economically speaking, the EEC/EU had served the UK well between accession in 1973 and the financial crash of 2008 but then the block has failed to recover its GDP, its vivacity and its allure for UK voters. Unlike other European countries the community / Union was never a political project - so when the tangible economic argument was lost in the minds of the people, all the political irritants that had been boiling away for over forty years came to the fore. ‘Taking back control’ - the slogan of the leave campaign was predominantly a political not an economic argument. Now that the people of the UK have made a political decision (decision is derived from the Latin to cut), the economic question of free market access comes back to the fore. On what basis may goods and services be sold to and from the European continent? The UK is exposed as never before since (perhaps even including) the time of Napoleon to ‘fortress’ Europe that has mercantilism in its DNA - and which the UK found so restrictive when it was part of the EU.
  • Berkshire Functional Economic Market Area Study

    Berkshire Functional Economic Market Area Study

    Berkshire Functional Economic Market Area Study Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership Final Report February 2016 Berkshire Functional Economic Market Area Study Final Report Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership February 2016 14793/MS/CGJ/LE Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners 14 Regent's Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL nlpplanning.com This document is formatted for double sided printing. © Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Ltd 2016. Trading as Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners. All Rights Reserved. Registered Office: 14 Regent's Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL All plans within this document produced by NLP are based upon Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright reserved. Licence number AL50684A Berkshire Functional Economic Market Area Study: Final Report Executive Summary This report has been prepared by Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners (‘NLP’) on behalf of the Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership (‘TVBLEP’) and the six Berkshire authorities of Bracknell Forest, Reading, Slough, West Berkshire, Windsor and Maidenhead and Wokingham. It establishes the various functional economic market areas that operate across Berkshire and the wider sub-region, in order to provide the six authorities and the TVBLEP with an understanding of the various economic relationships, linkages and flows which characterise the sub-regional economy. The methodological approach adopted for this study has been informed by national Planning Practice Guidance for assessing economic development needs and investigating functional economic market areas within and across local authority boundaries, and been subject to consultation with a range of adjoining authorities and other relevant stakeholders. A range of information and data has been drawn upon across a number of themes as summarised below: Economic and Sector Characteristics Berkshire has recorded strong job growth in recent years, outperforming the regional and national average.
  • Download Date: 30

    Download Date: 30

    Heriot-Watt University Research Gateway Spatial Economy and the geography of Functional Economic Areas Citation for published version: Jones, CA 2017, 'Spatial Economy and the geography of Functional Economic Areas', Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 486-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516642226 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1177/0265813516642226 Link: Link to publication record in Heriot-Watt Research Portal Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via Heriot-Watt Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy Heriot-Watt University has made every reasonable effort to ensure that the content in Heriot-Watt Research Portal complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 Spatial Economy and the Geography of Functional Economic Areas Colin Jones, Institute for Social Policy, Housing, Environment and Real Estate The spatial economy can be visualised as a web of overlapping markets or functional areas linked to different activities but research and policy practicalities require linear boundaries to such areas. As a result the definition of functional economic areas (FEAs) has been a long term challenge of urban and regional analysis.