Heterosexual College Students Who Hookup with Same-Sex Partners

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heterosexual College Students Who Hookup with Same-Sex Partners Archives of Sexual Behavior https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1194-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Heterosexual College Students Who Hookup with Same‑Sex Partners Arielle Kuperberg1 · Alicia M. Walker2 Received: 9 December 2016 / Revised: 13 March 2018 / Accepted: 14 March 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Individuals who identify as heterosexual but engage in same-sex sexual behavior fascinate both researchers and the media. We analyzed the Online College Social Life Survey dataset of over 24,000 undergraduate students to examine students whose last hookup was with a same-sex partner (N = 383 men and 312 women). The characteristics of a signifcant minority of these students (12% of men and 25% of women) who labelled their sexual orientation “heterosexual” difered from those who self- identifed as “homosexual,” “bisexual,” or “uncertain.” Diferences among those who identifed as heterosexual included more conservative attitudes, less prior homosexual and more prior heterosexual sexual experience, features of the hookups, and sentiments about the encounter after the fact. Latent class analysis revealed six distinctive “types” of heterosexually identifed students whose last hookup was with a same-sex partner. Three types, comprising 60% of students, could be clas- sifed as mostly private sexual experimentation among those with little prior same-sex experience, including some who did not enjoy the encounter; the other two types in this group enjoyed the encounter, but difered on drunkenness and desire for a future relationship with their partner. Roughly, 12% could be classifed as conforming to a “performative bisexuality” script of women publicly engaging in same-sex hookups at college parties, and the remaining 28% had strong religious practices and/or beliefs that may preclude a non-heterosexual identity, including 7% who exhibited “internalized heterosexism.” Results indicate several distinctive motivations for a heterosexual identity among those who hooked up with same-sex partners; previ- ous research focusing on selective “types” excludes many exhibiting this discordance. Keywords Hookups · Same-sex sexual behavior · Sexual identity · Internalized heterosexism Introduction when given that option, and same-sex attraction was reported by 5% of men and 13% of women, but only 2% of men and Many people engage in same-sex sexual encounters or desire 4% of women identifed as LGB (Savin-Williams & Ream, them but maintain a heterosexual identity; others who adopt a 2007). Another study representative of U.S. 15–44 year olds lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB) or other sexual minority identity found 9% of women and 3% of men who identifed as het- later relinquish it for a heterosexual one (Diamond, 2003; erosexual had same-sex sexual experience (Chandra, Copen, Hamilton, 2007; Walker, 2014a, 2014b; Ward, 2015). One & Mosher, 2013). study of college students found 30% of women and 19% of Several theoretical frameworks have been proposed to men who identifed as heterosexual reported same-sex attrac- explain this discordance. Some studies with limited samples tion (Hoburg, Konik, Williams, & Crawford, 2004). A study examined “the closet” or “the down low” (Boykin, 2005; Ford, representative of 18–26 year olds in the U.S. found 3% of Whetten, Hall, Kaufman, & Thrasher, 2007; King, 2004; Phil- men and 11% of women identifed as “mostly heterosexual” lips, 2005). Others focused on college “hookup culture” and expectations of sexual experimentation, including young women hooking up with other women at parties, ostensibly to * Arielle Kuperberg attract men (Diamond, 2005; Kimmel & Plante, 2002; Kuper- [email protected] berg & Padgett, 2015; Wade, 2017; Ward, 2015). A third line 1 Sociology Department, The University of North Carolina of research examined LGB identity acquisition (Cass, 1979, at Greensboro, PO Box 26170, Greensboro, NC 27402‑6170, 1996; Horowitz & Newcomb, 2002; Kaufman & Johnson, USA 2004). Negative feelings about homosexuality among those 2 Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Missouri State with same-sex attractions or “internalized heterosexism” may University, Springfeld, MO, USA Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Archives of Sexual Behavior also be a factor (Kaufman & Johnson, 2004; Taylor, 1999). We sexual encounters, they rejected a bisexual identity, instead examined whether a heterosexual identity among these students explaining these acts as due to their “freakiness,” which they correlated with characteristics that would be predicted by these felt was the accurate term for their sexual orientation (Walker, distinct and sometimes-competing frameworks, and the extent 2014b). Budnick (2016) found women with the least edu- to which students comprised distinguishable groups described cation reported the most lifetime same-sex sexual events, by these theories. but for some early entry into motherhood closed-of sexual exploration and possible development of a LGBQ identity. Same‑Sex Hookups Among Self‑Identifed Heterosexuals College Hookup Scripts and Same‑Sex Hookups Among Heterosexuals Public fascination with self-identifed heterosexuals hooking up with same-sex partners arose in the 1990s, along with phrases Recent literature examined college hookups, casual sexual “on the down low” and “on the D.L.” Originating among Afri- encounters which most college students participate in, that can-Americans, these idioms originally referred to any act done can range from an intense “make-out” session to intercourse secretly, but became associated with men who “publicly pre- (Bogle, 2008; England, Shafer, & Fogarty, 2008; Kuperberg sent as heterosexual while secretly having sex with other men” & Padgett, 2015, 2016; Reiber & Garcia, 2010). Hookup (Boykin, 2005; Ford et al., 2007; Phillips, 2005). Others used rates and risk-taking during hookups have been found to dif- “in the closet” to describe LGB individuals hiding their sexual fer by gender, GPA, race, religiosity, mother’s education, and identity in public, or even to themselves (Seidman, Meeks, & age (Kuperberg & Padgett, 2015, 2016, 2017). The college Traschen, 1999). Academic literature opted for “men who have hookup scene is an opportunity for students to experiment sex with men” or “MSM,” a term potentially obscuring the with and afrm non-heterosexual sexual identities or to con- meaning-making of sexuality (Young & Meyer, 2005). frm a heterosexual one (Rupp, Taylor, Regev-Messalem, Research on same-sex sexual encounters is generally lim- Fogarty, & England 2013). Social “scripts,” or expectations ited and subject to sample bias. Some examined risk-taking of behavior, position college as a “time to experiment” sexu- and sexual activity in same-sex hookups from a larger sample, ally (Kuperberg & Padgett, 2015; Simon & Gagnon, 2003) but most research focused on select groups, such as couples in and may encourage same-sex hookups even among those long-term relationships or those identifying as LGB (Eisenberg, without same-sex attractions. Many dismiss these hookups 2001; Kuperberg & Padgett, 2015, 2017; Peplau & Fingerhut, as “experimentation” or “accidental” (Ward, 2015). 2007; Rust, 1992). Past research also mostly focused on men Some women engage in same-sex hookups to attract men’s and recruited subjects from biased sources, including web- attention as an established part of the college hookup “sexual sites, bars, or parks known to be frequented by MSM or LGBT script” (Diamond, 2005; Wade, 2017). Women often conduct organizations and magazines (Brady & Busse, 1994; CDC, this “performative bisexuality” in public spaces for the bene- 2010; Cole, Kemeny, Taylor, & Visscher, 1996; Hightow et al., ft of a male audience, as it is a commonly reported “turn-on” 2006; Kaufman & Johnson, 2004; Koblin et al., 2000; Lindley, for heterosexual men (Kimmel & Plante, 2002). Hamilton Nicholson, Kerby, & Lu, 2003; Rhodes, DiClemente, Cecil, (2007) described a campus culture where heterosexually- Hergenrather, & Yee, 2002; Rosario, Schrimshaw, Hunter, & identifed women engaged in same-sex erotic behavior during Braun, 2006; Rowen & Malcolm, 2002). Much research on parties, later posting the pictorial evidence to social media. self-identifed heterosexuals hooking up with same-sex partners Often attributed to alcohol consumption, these encounters focused on African-American men, despite White men more included kissing and fondling breasts or buttocks, but no commonly exhibiting this disparity (Bleich & Taylor-Clark, genital contact, and allowed young women to mark them- 2005; Ford et al., 2007; King, 2004; Ross, Essien, Wiliams, & selves as “edgy” (Hamilton, 2007). Fernandez-Esquer, 2003; Ward, 2015). This focus may stem However, suggesting that women engage in this behavior only from perceptions that “the down low” is limited to African- to attract men may obscure some functions of these encoun- American men due to the origins of the term or heightened ters. In one study, two female roommates reported dancing surveillance of the sexuality of men of color (Ward, 2015). naked together when they were alone in their room, but jok- Women also seek out same-sex sexual partners while iden- ingly dismissed it as an activity for “when they were bored,” tifying as heterosexual (Walker, 2014a, b), although research while another study found women dismissing private same-sex on students included only small samples of 80 or fewer (Dia- hookups as a result of inebriation (Hamilton, 2007; Wade, 2017). mond, 2003; Hamilton, 2007; Peterson & Gerrity, 2006), and Hooking up with other
Recommended publications
  • I Think I Might Be Gay Pamphlet
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI The ommittC ee to Eliminate Heterosexism and Gender and Sexuality Center Homophobia 1990 I think I Might be Gay Pamphlet Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cmte-eliminate Recommended Citation "I think I Might be Gay Pamphlet" (1990). The Committee to Eliminate Heterosexism and Homophobia. Paper 182. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cmte-eliminate/182https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cmte-eliminate/182 This Pamphlet is brought to you for free and open access by the Gender and Sexuality Center at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in The ommittC ee to Eliminate Heterosexism and Homophobia by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. • Toll-free Hotlines I think I might You may want to call a hotline to speak to someone about being gay. You may want to be gay . .. call from a phone booth for privacy The people at the hotline will let you talk about your feelings, and will direct you to organiza­ tions that help gay people There may even be a gay youth group in your area. These hotline numbers are accurate as of ;\ugust 1990 and are toll-free from anywhere in the United States. Hotlines sometimes This brochure was written by Kevin Cran­ change If these don't work, try looking in a ston and Cooper Thompson with help from phone book. Most major cities have a lesbian members of BAGLY, Boston Alliance of Gay and gay hotline and Lesbian Youth, Inc r,Jational Lesbian and Gay Hotline: Produced and distributed by The Cam­ 1-800-SOS-GA YS paign to End Homophobia.
    [Show full text]
  • Masculinity As Prison: Sexual Identity, Race, and Incarceration Russell K
    Berkeley Law Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2011 Masculinity as Prison: Sexual Identity, Race, and Incarceration Russell K. Robinson Berkeley Law Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/facpubs Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Russell K. Robinson, Masculinity as Prison: Sexual Identity, Race, and Incarceration, 99 Cal. L. Rev. 1309 (2011) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Masculinity as Prison: Sexual Identity, Race, and Incarceration Russell K. Robinson* The Los Angeles County Men's Jail segregatesgay and transgender inmates and says that it does so to protect them from sexual assault. But not all gay and transgenderinmates qualify for admission to the K6G unit. Transgender inmates must appear transgender to staff that inspect them. Gay men must identify as gay in a public space and then satisfactorily answer a series of cultural questions designed to determine whether they really are gay. This policy creates harms for those who are excluded, including vulnerable heterosexual and bisexual men, men who have sex with men but do not embrace gay identity, and gay-identified men who do not mimic white, affluent gay culture. Further,the policy harms those who are included in that it stereotypes them as inherent victims, exposes them to a heightened risk of HIV transmission, and disrupts relationships that cut across gender identity and sexual orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Invisible Majority: the Disparities Facing Bisexual People and How to Remedy Them
    INVISIBLE MAJORITY: THE DISPARITIES FACING BISEXUAL PEOPLE AND HOW TO REMEDY THEM September 2016 Author Partners This report was authored by: This report was developed in partnership with: 2 Movement Advancement Project American Foundation for Suicide Prevention The Movement Advancement Project (MAP) is an BiNet USA independent think tank that provides rigorous research, Bisexual Organizing Project (BOP) insight, and analysis that help speed equality for Bi Queer Alliance Chicago LGBT people. MAP works collaboratively with LGBT Bisexual Resource Center (BRC) organizations, advocates and funders, providing Center for Culture, Sexuality, and Spirituality information, analysis and resources that help coordinate Los Angeles Bi Task Force (LABTF) and strengthen efforts for maximum impact. MAP’s policy National Black Justice Coalition research informs the public and policymakers about the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs legal and policy needs of LGBT people and their families. National LGBTQ Task Force For more information, visit www.lgbtmap.org. See page 28 for more information about these organizations. Contact Information MAP thanks the following major* funders, without Movement Advancement Project (MAP) whom this report would not have been possible. 2215 Market Street Denver, CO 80205 Craig Benson 1-844-MAP-8800 David Bohnett Foundation www.lgbtmap.org David Dechman & Michel Mercure David Geffen Foundation Ford Foundation Gill Foundation Esmond Harmsworth Jim Hormel Johnson Family Foundation Andy Lane Jeff Lewy & Ed Eishen
    [Show full text]
  • CLOSING the GAP: the TURNING POINT for LGBTQ HEALTH WHAT YOU NEED to KNOW to READ THIS REPORT Definitions
    Research by One Colorado Education Fund, the state’s largest advocacy organization dedicated to securing protections and opportunities for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Coloradans and their families. The Turning Point for LGBTQ Health www.one - colorado.org TABLE OF CONTENTS WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TO READ THIS REPORT Definitions Executive Summary Introduction Background The Impact of the Affordable Care Act on LGBTQ Coloradans Notable Policy Changes that Have Impacted LGBTQ Health Since 2011 HOW THE REPORT WAS DONE AND WHAT IT INCLUDES Methodology and Limitations Demographic Information WHAT THE HEALTH ASSESSMENT SAID Access to Health Care Personal Health and Well-Being Gender-Affirming Health Care WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO? Recommendations for Policy Makers and Health Systems Recommendations for Health Providers Recommendations for the LGBTQ Community and Organizations that Serve the Community CONCLUSION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS REFERENCES Release Date: June 2019 1 CLOSING THE GAP: THE TURNING POINT FOR LGBTQ HEALTH WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TO READ THIS REPORT Definitions Access - The ability of LGBTQ Coloradans to obtain quality health care services. Affordability - The ability of LGBTQ Coloradans to cover the monetary expenses of quality health care services. Behavioral Health - An inclusive term that encompasses the connection between physical and mental health, as well as considers external environmental factors that influence an individual’s well-being, such as poverty, discrimination, or trauma. This differs from mental health, although they are sometimes used interchangeably. Bisexual - A term used to describe a person whose romantic, physical, and emotional attractions are with both men and women. Clinical Competence - The ability to provide care based on standards or principles that satisfy the health needs of a given patient.
    [Show full text]
  • Coming out As Bisexual Guide
    A RESOURCE GUIDE TO COMING OUT AS BISEXUAL 1 Contents 3 Welcome 4 What Does It Mean to Come Out as Bisexual? 6 Coming Out to Yourself 7 Some Tips for Coming Out to Yourself 8 Coming Out to Others 8 Why Come Out? 9 Making a Plan to Come Out 11 Making Sure You Are Safe 11 Dealing With Negative Reactions 12 Coming Out to Different Groups of People 12 Coming Out to Family 14 Coming Out to Friends 15 Coming Out to Your Spouse or Partner 15 Coming Out to Your Children 16 Coming Out in Other Contexts 18 After You Come Out 18 Coming Out Again…and Again 19 Finding Community 20 Glossary of Terms 22 HRC Resources 23 Connecting with the Bi Community 2 Welcome Coming out –– the process of being open about your sexual orientation or gender identity –– is different for every person. For bisexual people, coming out can present some unique challenges. As bisexual people, we face skepticism and stereotypes about our sexuality, we are ignored and excluded from lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) spaces, and we are often invisible to each other –– challenges that can make coming out a complicated process. Coming out can also be wonderful. It can relieve the stress of having to hide part of yourself, and it gives you the ability to bring your whole self to your life and your relationships. It can also give you the chance to be a role model to others and help you connect with the bisexual community and others who support and celebrate your identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Collecting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SO/GI) Data in Electronic Health Records
    Collecting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SO/GI) Data In Electronic Health Records Alex S. Keuroghlian, MD MPH and Chris Grasso, MPH The National LGBT Health Education Center The Fenway Institute Fenway Health . Independent 501(c)(3) FQHC . Founded 1971 . Mission: To enhance the wellbeing of the LGBT community as well as people in our neighborhoods and beyond through access to the highest quality health care, education, research and advocacy . Integrated primary care model, including HIV services and transgender health The Fenway Institute . Research, Education, Policy www.lgbthealtheducation.org 2 LGBTQ Education and Training The National LGBT Health Education Center offers educational programs, resources, and consultation to health care organizations with the goal of providing affirmative, high quality, cost-effective health care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) people. Training and Technical Assistance . Grand Rounds . ECHO Programs . On Line Learning . Webinars and Learning Modules . CE, and HEI Credit . Resources and Publications . www.lgbthealtheducation.orgwww.lgbthealtheducation.org 3 Where We Work in the U.S. www.lgbthealtheducation.org 4 Learning Objectives This presentation will enable participants to: 1. Summarize how to incorporate SO/GI data collection into your EHR to improve communication, quality care, and data and quality management activities. 2. Describe the impact SO/GI data collection and development of related decision support will have on key stakeholders (patients, staff, and management). 3. Identify at least one method to actively engage and educate staff on the importance of collecting SO/GI data, how to do so, the data’s impact on health disparities, and how SO/GI can be used to direct education and clinical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • I Kissed a Girl: Do Women Feel Pressured to Engage in Public Same-Sex Sexual Behaviour?
    I Kissed a Girl: Do Women Feel Pressured to Engage in Public Same-Sex Sexual Behaviour? by Lucinda Leanne Brown M.A., University of Victoria, 2000 B.Ed., University of Calgary, 1988 B.A., University of Calgary, 1986 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies © Lucinda Brown, 2014 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee I Kissed a Girl: Do Women Feel Pressured to Engage in Public Same-Sex Sexual Behaviour? by Lucinda Leanne Brown M.A., University of Victoria, 2000 B.Ed., University of Calgary, 1988 B.A., University of Calgary, 1986 Supervisory Committee Dr. Joan Martin, (Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies) Supervisor Dr. Susan Tasker, (Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies) Departmental Member Dr. Carmen Gress, (Faculty of Graduate Studies) Outside Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Joan Martin, (Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies) Supervisor Dr. Susan Tasker, (Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies) Departmental Member Dr. Carmen Gress, (Faculty of Graduate Studies) Outside Member “Girl-on-girl” behaviour is portrayed as sexy, liberating, and edgy in contemporary popular culture, mass media, and public settings such as bars and parties. This study looked at the relation of women’s participation in public same-sex sexual behaviour (PSSSB), age, and sexual orientation (heterosexual versus some degree of same-sex orientation) with the following dependent variables: perceptions of PSSSB pressure, reasons for and feelings after engaging in PSSSB, sexual depression, sexual assertiveness, sexual self-efficacy, sexual locus of control, sexual monitoring, and use of PSSSB to explore sexual orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Tolerance: Gays, Lesbians, and Bisexuals on Campus. Hi.S Words Set the Tone for This Book and Give Urgency to the Material That Follows
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 336 682 CG 023 656 AUTHOR Evans, Nancy J., Ed.; Wall, Vernon A., Ed. TITLE Beyond Tolerance: Gays, Lesbians and Bisexuals on Campus. INSTITUTION American Coll. Personnel Association, Alexandria, VA. REPORT NO ISBN-1-55620-088-9 PUB DATE 91 NOTE 253p. AVAILABLE FROMAmerican Association for Counseling and Development, 5999 Stevenson Ave., Alexandria, VA 22304 (Order No. 72595; $23.95). PUB TYPE Reports - General (140) -- Collected Works - General (020) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Career Counseling; Colleges; *College Students; Counseling Techniques; Emotional Development; Higher Education; *Homosexuality; *Lesbianism; Personality Development; Sexuality; Social Development; *Student Personnel Services IDENTIFIERS *Homophobia ABSTRACT This book provides strategies for using what is known about gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals in a college student affairs setting. These chapters are included: (1) "The Development of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identities" (Heidi Levine and Nancy J. Evans); (2) "Using Psychosocial Development Theories To Understand and Work with Gay and Lesbian Persons" (Vernon A. Wall and Nancy J. Evans); (3) "Homophobia" (Kathy Obear);(4) "Understanding Gay and Lesbian Students of Color" (Vernon A. Wall and Jamie Washington); (5) "Addressing Lesbian and Gay Issues in Residence Hall Environments" (Donna Bourassa and Bill Shipton); (6) "Addressing Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Issues in Fraternities and Sororities" (Michael J. Hughes); (7) "Working with Gay and Lesbian Student Organizations" (Dick Scott);(8) "Life Planning and Career Counseling with Gay and Lesbian Students" (Cheryl Hetherington);(9) "Counseling Gay and Lesbian Students" (Natalie S. Eldridge and David C. Barnett); (10) "Issues of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Student Affairs Professionals" (Maura Cullen and Jim Smart); (11) "Becoming an Ally" (Jamie Was)ington and Nancy J.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT Welcoming Toolkit for Primary Care Practices
    LGBT Welcoming Toolkit for Primary Care Practices BWHC LGBT & Allies Employee Resource Group www.brighamandwomens.org/lgbt [email protected] www.brighamandwomens.org/lgbt [email protected] Message from the BWHC LGBT & Allies ERG Board EXECUTIVE SPONSORS Our LGBT Welcoming Toolkit aims to help the BWHC primary Michael Gustafson, MD, MBA care practices meet the needs of their lesbian, gay, bisexual, President, BWFH and transgender (LGBT) patients by delivering high quality, Erin McDonough, MBA patient-centered care. Generally speaking, one in twenty VP Communication and patients identifies as L, G, B or T. Do you consider your practice Public Affairs, BWH particularly welcoming to members of the LGBT community? ERG CO-CHAIRS Harry Reyes Nieva In this toolkit you will find information about our LGBT & Allies Primary Care, BWHC Employee Resource Group, a glossary of terms, a checklist to gauge just how welcoming and inclusive your practice might Pothik Chatterjee, MBA be, information about ways to signal to LGBT patients that you Strategic Planning, BWPO want to meet their needs, tips on gathering information about EDUCATION & sexual orientation and gender identity from patients and storing ADVOCACY CHAIR that information in eCare, and common stumbling blocks or W. Emily Leung, MS misconceptions that even those with the best of intentions may General Medicine, BWH unconsciously commit or have. We also point you to other COMMUNICATION & resources about LGBT health and care for LGBT patients. PUBLIC AFFAIRS CHAIR Meredith Solomon, MLS This toolkit is very much a living document that will Medical Library, BWH continue to grow. We encourage you to provide us with SOCIAL EVENTS CHAIR your feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Understanding of Bisexuality
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bournemouth University Research Online “AREN’T WE ALL A LITTLE BISEXUAL?” 1 “Aren’t we all a little bisexual?” The Recognition of Bisexuality in an Unlikely Place The hypermasculine subculture of men’s teamsports has traditionally been characterized by the one-time rule of homosexuality, where one same-sex sexual experience is normally equated with a homosexual orientation. Thus, men have been polarized into sexual identity categories, erasing bisexuality as a legitimate or viable category of sexual identification. However, in this research we examine the perspectives on bisexuality among 60 male soccer players from three strategically selected U.S. universities, showing that these athletes accept bisexuality as a legitimate and non-stigmatized sexual identity. We find that they intellectualize an understanding of bisexuality in highly complex ways. We also highlight that while only a very small minority have engaged in same-sex sexual behaviors, at some level, most players recognize some degree of bisexuality in their own identities. We suggest that these results are a product of increased exposure to and contact with homosexual persons, leading to decreasing cultural homohysteria, finally resulting in increasingly open discussion and complex understanding of sexual behaviors and identities that were once erased or stigmatized in men’s teamsport culture. Keywords: bisexuality, heteromasculinity, homophobia, homosexuality, sport, “AREN’T WE ALL A LITTLE BISEXUAL?” 2 Sport and the One-Time Rule of Homosexuality From early youth, and throughout young adulthood, boys and men are encouraged to participate in teamsports (c.f.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultures of Heterosexuality in the Secondary School Mary Jane Kehily
    Learning sex and doing gender: cultures of heterosexuality in the secondary school Mary Jane Kehily A thesis submitted to the Institute of Education, University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Culture, Communications and Society Institute of Education University of London 20 Bedford Way London WC1H OAL August 1999 MDL Abstract The thesis uses an inter-disciplinary, feminist and cultural studies approach to sexuality and schooling. The study documents the ways in which issues of sexuality feature in the school context and the implications of this for sexual learning and the production of sexual identities. The study examines the ways in which pupil cultures negotiate issues of sexuality. Pupil cultures can be understood as constitutive of informal groups of school students who actively ascribe meanings to events within specific social contexts. This approach points to the ways in which such encounters produce individual and collective identities which carry both social and psychic investments. The study focuses upon two key areasin the field of sexuality and schooling; the shaping of pupil cultures and the production of sexual identities; and secondly, the role of the school in relation to issues of sexuality. The thesis develops an analysis of pedagogic approachesto Personal and Social Education (PSE)and the ways in which the meanings and messagesof the curriculum are mediated by pupil cultures. The emphasis on pupil cultures can be seen as a way of giving epistemological status to school students who receivethe curriculum but play no part in the structuring of the school organisation or the plannýng of lessons. However, this approach can have the effect of seeing teachers as an oppressive, monolithic force, defined in opposition to pupils.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invisibility of Bisexuality Samantha Ulrich Sarah Lawrence
    The Invisibility of Bisexuality Samantha Ulrich Sarah Lawrence College Introduction The term "bisexual" is defined as a person who experiences sexual attraction for one or more genders. However, it is more commonly known as a person who experiences sexual desire for both men and women. While we might expect that this would mean that "bisexuality" is a third term equal to "straight' and "gay," many people today view bisexuality as a kind of spectrum with "straight" at one end and "gay" at the other. This view comes partly from the work of the psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud and partly from the work of the researcher Alfred Kinsey. In his essay, "The Epistemic Contract of Bisexual Erasure," author Kenji Yoshino quotes Freud, who said in Civilization and its Discontents (1930) that, “Man, too, is an animal organism with an unmistakably bisexual disposition” (Yoshino 374). Yoshino also notes that in another work, “Analysis Terminable and Interminable” (1937), Freud says, "We have come to learn, however, that every human being is bisexual in this case and that his libido is distributed either in a manifest or latent fashion, over objects of both sexes” (Yoshino 374). Building on Freud, Alfred Kinsey made bisexuality into a kind of scale or spectrum, and his research showed that most people have sexual experiences and desires that put them somewhere in the middle, and not exclusively "straight" or "gay" (Yoshino 380-85). If this so, and most people are naturally in between straight or gay, why is "bisexual" identity usually erased and made invisible in our society? "Bisexual erasure" means the systematic invalidation and underrepresentation of bisexual identity in discourses about sexuality.
    [Show full text]