History, Observations and Monitoring of Pediocactus Peeblesianus Var

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History, Observations and Monitoring of Pediocactus Peeblesianus Var History, Observations and Monitoring of Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae on the Arizona Strip Item Type Article Authors Hughes, Lee Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 06/10/2021 05:57:41 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/554196 PediocactusHughes 15 The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has conducted searches for P ediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae since the late 1970s and has found it to be rare and not present in History, Observations andmany limestone areas that appear to be good habitat. P Monitoring of Pediocactuspeeblesianus var. fickeiseniae usually grows near Coryphantha vivipara var. rosea (foxtail cactus). The au- peeblesianus van fickeiseniae onthor has never found this variety in the absence of this com- panion plant. The Coryphantha grows more often in lime- the Arizona Strip stone derived soils, where P peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae rarely grows. Lee Hughes Many of the region's professional and amateur botanists The Bureau of Land Management have developed an interest in the conservation and study of 345 East Riverside Drive Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae. A review of the St. George, Utah 84770 records of BLM's Arizona Strip District reveals several dis- coveries of P peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae (U.S. Dept. of Introduction the Interior, 1992, 1994). In May of 1977, H. Kuenaler and Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae is a small desert Ralph Gierisch found a small number ofP.. peeblesianus var. grassland cactus commonly known as the Fickeisen plainsfickeiseniae in the Sunshine Ridge area. This was followed cactus. This cactus if one of the plants monitored on theby the discovery of larger populations of P peeblesianus Arizona Strip, a strip of land along the Arizona -Utah border var. fickeiseniae in Sunshine Ridge by Lowell and Dorothy (Figure 1). Like the Brady pincushion cactus which grows Woodbury in September, 1979. In May, 1979, Ralph Gierisch, on the Marble Canyon rim of the Strip, during dry spells thethis time accompanied by D.C. Anderson, found a popula- taproot of Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae con-tion on the west side of House Rock Valley. In that same year, tracts causing the plant to retreat into the soil. It re- emergesArt Phillips located P peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae on the in response to precipitation. P peeblesianus var. fickeiseniaerims of Bedrock, Marble, and North Canyons (phillips et al., is a study- friendly cactus, whose soft spines allow it to be 1979). Ralph Gierisch, Dorothy Woodbury, and Lowell measured with few if any punctures. Woodbury found P peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae near Toquer Tank in Hurricane Valley and in Mainstreet Valley. In Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae is a Category 1981, the Woodburys found P. peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae one candidate species for federal protection; "taxa for whichon the top of Hurricane Cliffs. BLM records then skip to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has sufficient information 1985 -87 when Lee Hughes and Ralph Gierisch (Gierisch, 1979- on vulnerability and threats to support a proposal to list1987) discovered other populations of P peeblesianus var. them as threatened or endangered" (U.S. Fish and Wildlifefickeiseniae in Hurricane Valley. These two botanists set up Service, 1992). monitoring plots and transects in 1987 at Mainstreet (Dutch- man), Toquer Tank, Clayhole Ridge, Sunshine Ridge and Earle (1963) described Pediocactus peeblesianus var.North Canyon. From 1987 to the present, searches have con- fickeiseniae as follows: tinued for P peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae, however, none of the recent findings have been far from populations found " A 7.5 cm (3 inch) tall plant, 4 cm (1 5/8 inches) in diameter; in the late 1970's and early 1980's. All of the above searchers 5 cm (2 inches) of its height is usually underground; thedescribed the species occurrence as scarce and rare, but the prominent tubercles are 5 to 9 mm (3/16 to 3/8 inch) tall andfew plants found were reported as healthy. form 6 to 8 spiralled rows around the plant; central spine is 6 mm (3/16 inch) long, spreading, ashy- white). Flowers appear Habitat Description in April, creamy to yellow, 1.85 cm (3/4 inch) in diameter; fruit greenish- maroon, 0.65 cm (1/4) inch) in diameter; seeds gray- Soils ish- black." (Figures 2,3,4) Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae grows on soils derived from exposed layers of Kaibab limestone on the mar- Benson's (1969) comparison table (Table 1) describesgins of canyons or well- drained hills in the Navajoan Desert Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae and two other at an elevation of 4,000 -5,000 feet. The composition and chem- varieties of Pediocactus peeblesianus. istry of these soils are shown in Table 2. The soil samples were taken from one or two soil pits at each of the localities Occurrences of Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae are listed. The sampling was intended to be cursory and to give geographically disjointed on the Arizona Strip, from Mainstreet a hint of the soil physics and chemistry whereP. peeblesianus Valley on the west to Marble Canyon on the east. This speciesvar. fickeiseniae grows. grows on limestone ridges back from limestone cliffs, and on the toe slopes of limestone- derived.soils. 16 Desert Plants1996 Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae General Locations - Arizona Strip District RIB II Mimi iiiiMISFLOOems 31 F1111111111111111n1P MEW 11111111111111 iv- MINIM ISIII 1/4I IIEl a Ell NM NW Ern Legend - Paved Highway Bureau of Land Management Miles Primary Unpaved Roads St. George, Utah o 510 15 Figure 1. The Arizona Strip Climate mined. Fruiting is noted if plots and transects are monitored The climate of the Arizona Strip is typical for the Southwest.at the proper time of the year. At the Sunshine transect, two The winter precipitation pattern is influenced by large storms plots were established in 1994. off the north Pacific. These slow, steady storms last several days, after which low temperatures give the precipitation time The width ofPediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae has to soak into the soil. Summer brings rain in the form of in-been measured in the Dutchman and North Canyon plots. tense thunderstorms from July into September. These storms Two transects have also been read annually at the Clayhole often result in flash flooding. March and August are gener-and Sunshine locations. These transects give less accurate ally the wettest months (Green and Sellers, 1979). Table 3 is data than the plots and smaller cacti are often missed in for an elevation range of 3500 to 7500 feet above sea level. transect monitoring. However, the data is accurate enough to detect changes in width similar to those changes shown in Vegetation plots. Other small populations in outlying habitats are marked Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae is associated withwith rebar placed in the center of cactus clusters. These rebar vegetation of the desert grasslands. The dominant speciessites are visited once every five to ten years, and the data is are blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), black grama (Boutelouaused to determine if the cactus is still present. eriopoda), galleta ( Hilaria jamesii), fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens), snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae),Since 1986, Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae has and sagebrush ( Artemisia tridentata). When it has long softbeen monitored at four locations across the Strip. Table 4 spines, P peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae often appears like shows annual measurements of width; table 5 shows mortality, the basal leaves of the blue grama or galleta grass. and fruiting is shown in table 6. All data are from 1986 to 1993. Monitoring Studies Discussion At the plots and transects set up to monitor PediocactusOn the Dutchman plot, site of the most dense Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae, the cacti are tagged, mapped,peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae population, the number of and measured. Size is measured by width in millimeters, andplants have fluctuated according to growing conditions (Fig- mortality is noted along with cause of death if it can be deter- ure 5). Data from the first three years shows no very small PediocactusHughes 17 Dutchman Plot 15 40 10 0 -4.9mm 5 -10mm 10.1- 20 mm 20.1-30mm 30.1 +=I Size: Wfdlh Rainfall One Year Previous to Monitoring of the above Plots Seasonal Rainfall Fall Fall WinterWinterSpringSpringSummerSummerTotalTotal Ave. Ave. Ave. Ave. Ave. 1987 1.841.752.32 2.91 2.35 2.43 3.06 3.53 9.57 10.61 1991 .37 1.53 2.81 2.19 .90 2.01 1.53 3.29 5.61 9.02 1993 1.91 1.525.84 2.38 3.45 2.16 2.02 3.24 13.229.30 Figure 5.Width measurements at the Dutchman Plot and rainfall from the season previous to data collection. cacti (0 -9 mm), but good recruitment of very small cacti fromover a 1/4 mile length. Mortality is low, and most deaths result 1989 through 1992. The plot is dominated by the 10 to 20 mm from depredation and rot. Cattle trampling killed three cacti in 1988. width size, which is the size at which fruiting begins. All plant widths outside the 0 -4.9 mm size are well represented in The North Canyon plot is dominated by the 10 -30 mm size the plot. The difficulty of finding the 0 -4.9 mm size on theclass (Figure 6). The very small cacti 0 -4.9 mm, were sought grass- covered site could partially explain the absence of thisbut not found. Timing, however, is crucial for finding very class in the charts. In some dry years for a few months beforesmall cacti, which may be only rarely visible. Quite a few cacti monitoring, small cacti usually retract first (table 4 ). Timingshow up in the 5 -10 mm size.
Recommended publications
  • Threatened, Endangered, Candidate & Proposed Plant Species of Utah
    TECHNICAL NOTE USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho and Salt Lake City, Utah TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 52 MARCH 2011 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, CANDIDATE & PROPOSED PLANT SPECIES OF UTAH Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Loren St. John, PMC Team Leader, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Casey Burns, State Biologist, NRCS, Salt Lake City, Utah Last Chance Townsendia (Townsendia aprica). Photo by Megan Robinson. This technical note identifies the current threatened, endangered, candidate and proposed plant species listed by the U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service (USDI FWS) in Utah. Review your county list of threatened and endangered species and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Conservation Data Center (CDC) GIS T&E database to see if any of these species have been identified in your area of work. Additional information on these listed species can be found on the USDI FWS web site under “endangered species”. Consideration of these species during the planning process and determination of potential impacts related to scheduled work will help in the conservation of these rare plants. Contact your Plant Material Specialist, Plant Materials Center, State Biologist and Area Biologist for additional guidance on identification of these plants and NRCS responsibilities related to the Endangered Species Act. 2 Table of Contents Map of Utah Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Plant Species 4 Threatened & Endangered Species Profiles Arctomecon humilis Dwarf Bear-poppy ARHU3 6 Asclepias welshii Welsh’s Milkweed ASWE3 8 Astragalus ampullarioides Shivwits Milkvetch ASAM14 10 Astragalus desereticus Deseret Milkvetch ASDE2 12 Astragalus holmgreniorum Holmgren Milkvetch ASHO5 14 Astragalus limnocharis var.
    [Show full text]
  • "Micropropagation of Members of the Cactaceae Subtribe Cactinae"
    J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 115(2):337-343. 1990. Micropropagation of Members of the Cactaceae Subtribe Cactinae Philip W. Clayton1, John F. Hubstenberger, and Gregory C. Phillips2 Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003- 0003 S. Ann Butler-Nance Department of Experimental Statistics, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003-0003 Additional index words. cactus, in vitro, Escobaria, Mamillaaria, Pediocactus, Sclerocactus, Toumeya Abstract. Micropropagation of 11 rare or endangered cacti species belonging to the subtribe Cactinae was achieved by rooting of proliferated axillary shoots. Shoot tip explants were obtained from seedlings of Escobaria missouriensis D.R. Hunt, E. robbinsorum (Earle) D.R. Hunt, Sclerocactus spinosior (Engelm.) Woodruff & L. Benson, and Toumeya papyracantha (Engelm.) Br. & Rose, and from mature plants of Mammillaria wrightii Engelm., Pediocactus bradyi L. Benson, P. despainii Welsh & Goodrich, P. knowltonii L. Benson, P. paradinei B.W. Benson, P. winkleri Heil, and S. mesae-verdae (Boissevain) L. Benson. Three or four species were used in each of a series of experiments investigating the effects of basal media and auxin and cytokinin types and concentrations on axillary shoot proliferation. Low or no auxin but moderate to high cytokinin concentrations were required for axillary shoot production. All species rooted spontaneously on hormone-free media; however, several species rooted better on media containing auxin. All species were re-established in the greenhouse. The propagation of native cacti is usually done with seed and painii, P. paradinei, P. winklerii, Toumeya papyracantha), rooted offshoots; however, conventional propagation methods threatened (E. robbinsorum, S. mesae-verdae), or endangered are inadequate for those species that exhibit no to few offshoots, (P.
    [Show full text]
  • March Show Plants
    March 2020, Vol 24 NO.3 The Colorado Cactus & Succulent Society promotes education, enjoyment, cultivation, and conservation of cacti and other succulents among our members and the larger community Remember, Dues are due Newsletter editor, Linda Meyer Please send ideas, comments, critiques,and kudos to enhance future newsletters March Show Plants: Meeting Tuesday, March 17 Echinocereus 6:00 pm, Mitchell Hall Adromischus See more info about show plants on p 3 Snacks: Last names starting with Q-Z The CCSS March program will be a presenta- A Message from the CCSS Board: tion by Panayoti Kelaidis from the Denver Bo- Out of concern for the health of our guests and tanic Gardens entitled “Succulents Around The volunteers plus the staff of the Event Center, and World.” He writes, “Everyone has their 15 min- to help slow the overall spread of the coronavirus utes of fame, as Andy Warhol assured us. With outbreak, we are postponement the 2020 CCSS plants, it’s a little different: Succulents have had Show and Sale. The CCSS Board has discussed a decade of increasing popularity, with no end and debated this action continuously over the past in sight. I have had the privilege to travel quite week, but this was a unanimous decision. a bit in my work, and over the last few years, I’ve been astonished to find succulents thriving and being displayed proudly and ubiquitously We are looking at various options, in terms of in New Zealand, China, Tibet, even in Greece! dates and locations, to hold the Show and Sale lat- I’ll share some of these unlikely cameos of our er in the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Cactaceae) with Special Emphasis on the Genus Mammillaria Charles A
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2003 Phylogenetic studies of Tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae) with special emphasis on the genus Mammillaria Charles A. Butterworth Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Butterworth, Charles A., "Phylogenetic studies of Tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae) with special emphasis on the genus Mammillaria " (2003). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 565. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/565 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Years of Cultivation I Primi Anni Di Coltivazione
    Cactus & Co. – cultivation – cultivation – cactus nordamericani north american cacti Pediocactusi primi anni di the early coltivazione years of Text & Photos: Jean Bonnefond cultivation Introduzione Introduction Alla fine del 2007, in seguito alla pubblicazione di un At the end of 2007, following the publication of an ar- articolo sui Pediocactus sulla rivista Succulentes, sono ticle of mine on Pediocactus in the journal Succulentes, stato invitato a tenere presso l’ELK 2009 una confe- I was invited to give a lecture at ELK 2009 dedicated renza dedicata a questo genere. Dopo aver accettato to this genus. I accepted the invitation, but decided l’invito, mi è parso subito logico non ripercorrere straight away not to go back over what I had written quanto già scritto nel precedente articolo. Incomin- in the previous article. I was beginning to have a fair ciavo ad avere una buona conoscenza dei Pediocactus a knowledge of Pediocactus after my numerous trips to seguito dei miei numerosi viaggi negli Stati Uniti e in the United States, where in particular I had travelled particolare nel vasto settore intorno a Four Corners, e in the huge area around Four Corners; and I had long il mio interesse sulla coppia Pediocactus – Sclerocactus been extremely interested in the pair Pediocactus - era vivo ormai da tempo. Sclerocactus. Avevo già sperimentato all’inizio degli anni ’90 la In the early 1990s I had already experimented with semina di queste cactacee, rigorosamente coltivate growing these cacti from seed, rigorously cultivating sulle proprie radici, e, quindi mi proposi di incentra- them on their own roots, and so I thought I would re la conferenza sull’esperienza acquisita in materia.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 1995
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 1995 / Notices 49855 considered necessary for conservation of Authority: The authority for this action is recovery levels for downlisting or the species, establish criteria for the Section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, delisting them, and estimate time and recovery levels for downlisting or 16 U.S.C. 1533(f). cost for implementing the recovery delisting them, and estimate time and Dated: September 21, 1995. measures needed. cost for implementing the recovery Linda LaClaire, The Endangered Species Act (Act) of measures needed. Acting Field Supervisor. 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et The Endangered Species Act of 1973 [FR Doc. 95±23955 Filed 9±26±95; 8:45 am] seq.), requires the development of (Act), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et BILLING CODE 4310±55±M recovery plans for listed species unless seq.), requires the development of such a plan would not promote the recovery plans for listed species unless conservation of a particular species. such a plan would not promote the Availability of a Draft Recovery Plan Section 4(f) of the Act, as amended in conservation of a particular species. for the Utah Pediocactus: San Rafael 1988, requires that public notice and an Section 4(f) of the Act, as amended in Cactus (Pediocactus despainii) and opportunity for public review and 1988, requires that a public notice and Winkler Cactus (Pediocactus winkleri) comment be provided during recovery an opportunity for public review and for Review and Comment plan development. The Service will comment be provided during recovery consider all information presented plan development.
    [Show full text]
  • October-On the Dry Side 2017
    OCTOBER 2017 On the Dry Side Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Area Cactus & Succul;ent Society Contents President’s Message ........................ 1 Contents ......................................... 1 MBACSS Board Meeting ................. 2 Nomination of Officers .................... 2 October Program ............................. 3 In Members’ Gardens ...................... 4 MBACSS Calendar for 2017 ............ 5 Gymnocalycium vatteri Succulent Glory - Photos ................ 6 by Sarah Martin Succulents on the Move ................... 7 Member Update .............................. 8 Officers & Chairpersons ................... 8 President’s Message By Tom Karwin Our Fall Show & Sale was a pleasant and smooth-running experience, due to the diligent and thoughtful efforts of the organizers and volunteers. We will recognize them individually and collectively at our meeting. The occasion also seemed quite successful! We’ll get the official reports at our board and general meetings. This newsletter is two days later than intended. Sorry about that! The problem begins when the first day of the month falls on a Sunday; that just messes up my calendar! I hope your calendar is working better, and I'll see you at the meeting! Save the Date! MBACSS Meets Board Meets Future Meetings Oct. 15, 2017 Oct. 15, 2017 Third Sundays Gathering @ 12:00 Board @ 11:00 Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post 1716 Agave victoria reginae alba Potluck @ 12:30 Members always by Gardener’s Home 1960 Freedom Blvd. welcome to attend Program @ 1:00 Watsonville, CA 2 ON THE DRY SIDE OCTOBER 2017 Minutes of the September Board Meeting Recorded by Stan Verkler and Edited by Tom Karwin Board Members in Attendance: Naomi Bloss, Tom Karwin, Sharon Luchessi. Sarah Martin, Linda McNally, Ruth Pantry, Stan Verkler. Board Members Absent: Gary Stubblefield, Manson Waters Guests: Ellen Stubblefield Approval of Minutes: The board approved September’s minutes as published but corrected to list Naomi Bloss as present.
    [Show full text]
  • Sclerocactus Mesae-Verdae (Mesa Verde Cactus)
    Status Assessment Report for Sclerocactus mesae-verdae (Mesa Verde cactus) Prepare d for: The Navajo Natural Heritage Program, Window Rock, Arizona By: Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates, LLC Centennial, CO 80122 December 13, 2004 PREAMBLE FOR THE RECOVERY OF SCLEROCACTUS MESAE-VERDAE. Excerpt of the 1984 US Fish and Wildlife Recovery Plan (Heil 1984): “The primary objective of this recovery plan is to restore the Mesa Verde cactus to non- threatened status by: 1) Securing the five known populations from present and future human threats. 2) Ensuring that the Mesa Verde cacti are maintained as vigorous and self-sustaining populations throughout their natural habitat. As this objective is met, delisting will be initiated when the following criteria have been met: I.) Establishment of at least two restricted use areas for selected portions of Mesa Verde cactus habitat on the Navajo Indian Reservation and on BLM administered land. II.) Provision of Mesa Verde cactus stock to trade outlets to help relieve the black market demand through the addition of 10,000 plants per year into the commercial pipeline for 5 years. These goals are to be evaluated for adequacy upon attainment and prior to delisting.” 1 STATUS ASSESSMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY..........................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................5 MANAGEMENT STATUS AND NATURAL HISTORY
    [Show full text]
  • Southwestern Rare and Endangered Plants
    Knowlton’s Cactus (Pediocactus knowltonii): Eighteen Years of Monitoring and Recovery Actions 1 2 ROBERT C. SIVINSKI AND CHARLIE MCDONALD 1New Mexico Forestry Division, P.O. Box 1948, Santa Fe, NM 87504 2USDA-Forest Service, 333 Broadway Blvd., SE, Rm. 209, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 ABSTRACT. Pediocactus knowltonii is a rare, endemic cactus that is presently known to occur on a single 10-hectare hill in northwestern New Mexico near the Colorado border. It was listed as federally endangered in 1979. Population monitoring and recovery actions were initiated when the Recovery Plan was adopted in 1985. The land at the type locality has been donated to The Nature Conservancy and long-term monitoring plots have been annually studied since 1986. This population reached peak density in 1994 and is presently in decline. A total of 301 clones were made and transplanted to two nearby habitats above the Los Pinos arm of Navajo Lake, beginning in 1985. Transplant survival and flowering were good, but natural recruitment has been slow. Seeding trials were also conducted at both locations in 1985 and 1991. Only 4% of seeds planted became established as adult plants and no new recruitment has yet been observed. INTRODUCTION by the New Mexico Cactus and Succulent Society in 1960, which was Pediocactus knowltonii L. Benson under the mistaken perception that this (Knowlton's cactus), listed as site would be flooded by the newly endangered by U.S. Fish & Wildlife constructed Navajo Reservoir. Field Service (USFWS) on November 28, trips were organized to salvage the cacti 1979, is one of the rarest cacti in the from the type locality.
    [Show full text]
  • And Pediocactus Peeblesianus Var
    Vol. 78 Tuesday, No. 190 October 1, 2013 Part V Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Echinomastus erectocentrus var. acunensis (Acun˜a Cactus) and Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae (Fickeisen Plains Cactus) Throughout Their Ranges; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:36 Sep 30, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\01OCR4.SGM 01OCR4 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES4 60608 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (TDD) may call the Federal Information For the Fickeisen plains cactus, the Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. threats to the species and its habitat Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: result from habitat destruction, modification, and degradation from 50 CFR Part 17 Executive Summary livestock grazing (Factor A) in This document consists of a final rule combination with predation by small [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2012–0061; mammals (Factor C) and natural 4500030113] to list as endangered Echinomastus erectocentrus var. acunensis (acun˜ a environmental variability and the effects RIN 1018–AY51 cactus) and Pediocactus peeblesianus of climate such as drought. When var. fickeiseniae (Fickeisen plains combined with the above mentioned Endangered and Threatened Wildlife cactus) under the Act. For the remainder threats, small population size (Factor E) and Plants; Endangered Species of this document, these species will be likely exacerbates the effects of these Status for Echinomastus erectocentrus referred to by their common names. threats on the Fickeisen plains cactus.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft RECOVERY PLAN
    Winkler cactus (Pediocactus winkleri) AND San Rafael cactus (Pediocactus despainii) Draft RECOVERY PLAN December 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado DISCLAIMER Recovery plans use the best available information to identify reasonable actions for protecting and recovering listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, or others. Attainment of recovery objectives and availability of funds are subject to budgetary and other constraints as well as the need to address other priorities. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement for any Federal agency to obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341, or any other law or regulation. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views, official position, or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in plan formulation other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director. Approved plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. The literature citation for this document should read: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Winkler cactus (Pediocactus winkleri) and San Rafael cactus (Pediocactus despainii) recovery plan. Technical/agency draft. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado. xii + 133 pp. Additional copies of the draft document can be obtained from: Utah Ecological Services Office U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Cacti
    Haseltonia (2002) 9: 17-25 Cota-Sánchez – Canadian Cacti TAXONOMY, DISTRIBUTION, RARITY STATUS AND USES OF CANADIAN CACTI J. HUGO COTA-SÁNCHEZ University of Saskatchewan Department of Biology Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2 – Canada Email: [email protected] Summary. The cacti of Canada include four taxa: Escobaria vivipara var. vivipara, Opuntia fragilis var. fragilis, O. humifusa, and O. polyacantha var. polyacantha. These species are well adapted to survive the freezing temperatures prevalent during the long Canadian winters. Although they are widely distributed in the southern portion of the country, some species are rare or uncommon at the provincial level, e.g., E. vivipara var. vivipara in Saskatchewan and O. polyacantha var. polyacantha in British Columbia. O. humifusa is listed as rare at the national level but is common in the U.S. This paper presents an overview of the taxonomy, distribution, current status, and traditional aboriginal and modern uses of Canadian cacti. It also discusses the reproductive strategies and the correlation in the distribution of cacti at high latitudes with chromosome number variation (polyploidy). Introduction The cactus family includes remarkable plants with several morphological and physiological adaptations that enable them to survive the harsh Canadian winters. Unlike most flowering plant families that have fairly narrow ranges of distributions in terms of environment and latitude, the Cactaceae are distributed over a wide range of environments that include the humid, wet tropics, the tropical and temperate deserts, and the cold sub-arctic regions of Canada and Patagonia, where temperatures are often below -300C. In spite of the severe winters with prevailing low temperatures that limit the distribution of many plant families, Canada’s flora contains several succulent plants, including four species of cacti, which are the subject of this paper.
    [Show full text]