DOCSLIB.ORG

And Pediocactus Peeblesianus Var

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
And Pediocactus Peeblesianus Var Vol. 78 Tuesday, No. 190 October 1, 2013 Part V Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Echinomastus erectocentrus var. acunensis (Acun˜a Cactus) and Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae (Fickeisen Plains Cactus) Throughout Their Ranges; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:36 Sep 30, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\01OCR4.SGM 01OCR4 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES4 60608 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (TDD) may call the Federal Information For the Fickeisen plains cactus, the Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. threats to the species and its habitat Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: result from habitat destruction, modification, and degradation from 50 CFR Part 17 Executive Summary livestock grazing (Factor A) in This document consists of a final rule combination with predation by small [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2012–0061; mammals (Factor C) and natural 4500030113] to list as endangered Echinomastus erectocentrus var. acunensis (acun˜ a environmental variability and the effects RIN 1018–AY51 cactus) and Pediocactus peeblesianus of climate such as drought. When var. fickeiseniae (Fickeisen plains combined with the above mentioned Endangered and Threatened Wildlife cactus) under the Act. For the remainder threats, small population size (Factor E) and Plants; Endangered Species of this document, these species will be likely exacerbates the effects of these Status for Echinomastus erectocentrus referred to by their common names. threats on the Fickeisen plains cactus. var. acunensis (Acun˜ a Cactus) and Why we need to publish a rule. On In addition, the existing regulatory Pediocactus peeblesianus var. October 3, 2012 (77 FR 60509), we mechanisms are not ameliorating threats fickeiseniae (Fickeisen Plains Cactus) published proposed rules to list acun˜ a to the species. Throughout Their Ranges cactus and Fickeisen plains cactus as Peer review and public comment. We endangered species and to designate sought comments from independent AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, specialists to ensure that our Interior. critical habitat for both species. In this document, we finalize our designation is based on scientifically ACTION: Final rule. determinations as endangered species sound data, assumptions, and analyses. We invited these peer reviewers to SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and for these species under the Act. The Act comment on our listing proposal. We Wildlife Service (Service), determine requires that a final rule be published obtained peer reviews from two that Echinomastus erectocentrus var. within one year of a proposed rule in knowledgeable individuals for the acunensis (acun˜ a cactus) and order to add species to the lists of acun˜ a cactus and two knowledgeable Pediocactus peeblesianus var. endangered and threatened plants to individuals for the Fickeisen plains fickeiseniae (Fickeisen plains cactus) provide protections under the Act. We cactus, all with scientific expertise to meet the definition of endangered have determined that critical habitat for review our technical assumptions, species under the Endangered Species the acun˜ a cactus and the Fickeisen analysis, and whether or not we had Act of 1973, as amended. This final rule plains cactus is prudent and used the best available information for implements the Federal protections determinable in the proposed rule and both plants. These peer reviewers provided by the Act for these species. will soon publish in the Federal generally concurred with our methods The effect of this regulation will be to Register our final determination and conclusions and provided add these species to the List of designating critical habitat for both additional information, clarifications, Endangered and Threatened Wildlife cacti. The final critical habitat and suggestions to improve this final and Plants under the Endangered designation and supporting documents rule. Information we received from peer Species Act. will publish under Docket No. FWS– R2–ES–2013–0025, and can also be review is incorporated in this final DATES: This rule becomes effective revised designation. We also considered October 31, 2013. found at the above locations. The Endangered Species Act provides all comments and information received ADDRESSES: This final rule is available basis for our action. Under the during the comment period. on the Internet at http:// Endangered Species Act, we can Organization of Document www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FWS– determine that a species is an The layout of this rule is as follows: R2–ES–2012–0061. Comments and endangered or threatened species based the final listing determination of the materials we received, as well as on any of five factors: (A) The present acun˜ a cactus and the final listing supporting documentation used in the or threatened destruction, modification, determination for the Fickeisen plains preparation of this final rule, are or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) cactus. available for public inspection at http:// Overutilization for commercial, www.regulations.gov. All of the recreational, scientific, or educational Previous Federal Actions comments, materials, and purposes; (C) Disease or predation; (D) documentation that we considered in Please refer to the proposed listing The inadequacy of existing regulatory rule for the acun˜ a cactus and Fickeisen this rulemaking are available by mechanisms; or (E) Other natural or appointment, during normal business plains cactus (77 FR 60509; October 3, manmade factors affecting its continued 2012) for a detailed description of hours at: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, existence. Arizona Ecological Services Office, 2321 previous Federal actions concerning For the acun˜ a cactus, the threats to these species. West Royal Palm Rd., Suite 103, the species and its habitat result from Phoenix, AZ 85021; by telephone 602– the effects of drought and climate Summary of Changes From Proposed 242–0210; or by facsimile 602–242– change (Factor A) in combination with Rule 2513. predation by native insect and small Since the publication of the October FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: mammal predators (Factor C). Threats 3, 2012 (77 FR 60509), proposed rule to Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor, U.S. also result from habitat destruction, list and designate critical habitat for the Fish and Wildlife Service, Arizona modification, and degradation from acun˜ a cactus and Fickeisen plains Ecological Services Field Office, 2321 United States-Mexico border activities cactus, we have made the following W. Royal Palm Road, Suite 103, (Factor A) and nonnative, invasive plant changes in this final rule: Phoenix, AZ 85021; by telephone (602) species issues (Factor A). In addition, (1) Based on information received 242–0210; or by facsimile (602) 242– the existing regulatory mechanisms in from public comments, we reevaluated 2513. Persons who use a place do not directly address the threats the threat of nonnative, invasive plants telecommunications device for the deaf to the species. on the acun˜ a cactus. As a result, we VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:36 Sep 30, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01OCR4.SGM 01OCR4 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES4 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 60609 determined that nonnative, invasive The first comment period, associated peer reviewer commented that Flora of plants currently occur in the vicinity of with the publication of the proposed North America considers the Fickeisen several populations of acun˜ a cactus, rule (77 FR 60509), opened on October plains cactus a subspecies of including the largest known population, 3, 2012, and closed on December 3, Pediocactus peeblesianus. The peer and will become a threat to the acun˜ a 2012. We requested written comments reviewer pointed out that we stated that cactus in the near future. Therefore, we on the proposed listing and critical the variety fickeiseniae was never conclude nonnative, invasive species habitat rule and the associated draft validly published; therefore, we should pose a threat to the acun˜ a cactus and its economic analyses during a comment use the current taxonomy. habitat. period that opened on March 28, 2013, Our Response: We have corrected our (2) Based on information received and closed on April 29, 2013, (78 FR statement in the rule (see ‘‘Taxonomy’’ from public comments that both 18938). We contacted all appropriate under ‘‘Species Description’’) that there affirmed and refuted the threat of Federal, State, tribal, and local agencies; are nine recognized species of nonnative, invasive plants on the scientific organizations; and other Pediocactus in the United States, eight Fickeisen plains cactus, we reevaluated interested parties and invited them to of which are endemic to the Colorado this threat. We conducted a thorough comment. Newspaper notices Plateau. We have referred to the review of available information and concerning the proposed rule and Fickeisen plains cactus (Pediocactus reassessed the distribution of nonnative, inviting the general public to comment peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae) as a invasive species to Fickeisen plains were published by two local variety since it was categorized as a cactus populations, including their risk newspapers. We did not receive any candidate species in 1980 based on
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum
    Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum By Colorado Natural Heritage Program For The Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative June 2011 Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative Members David Anderson, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Rob Billerbeck, Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) Leo P. Bruederle, University of Colorado Denver (UCD) Lynn Cleveland, Colorado Federation of Garden Clubs (CFGC) Carol Dawson, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Michelle DePrenger-Levin, Denver Botanic Gardens (DBG) Brian Elliott, Environmental Consulting Mo Ewing, Colorado Open Lands (COL) Tom Grant, Colorado State University (CSU) Jill Handwerk, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Tim Hogan, University of Colorado Herbarium (COLO) Steve Kettler, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Andrew Kratz, U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Sarada Krishnan, Colorado Native Plant Society (CoNPS), Denver Botanic Gardens Brian Kurzel, Colorado Natural Areas Program Eric Lane, Colorado Department of Agriculture (CDA) Paige Lewis, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Ellen Mayo, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mitchell McGlaughlin, University of Northern Colorado (UNC) Jennifer Neale, Denver Botanic Gardens Betsy Neely, The Nature Conservancy Ann Oliver, The Nature Conservancy Steve Olson, U.S. Forest Service Susan Spackman Panjabi, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Jeff Peterson, Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Josh Pollock, Center for Native Ecosystems (CNE) Nicola Ripley,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 It's All Geek to Me: Translating Names Of
    IT’S ALL GEEK TO ME: TRANSLATING NAMES OF INSECTARIUM ARTHROPODS Prof. J. Phineas Michaelson, O.M.P. U.S. Biological and Geological Survey of the Territories Central Post Office, Denver City, Colorado Territory [or Year 2016 c/o Kallima Consultants, Inc., PO Box 33084, Northglenn, CO 80233-0084] ABSTRACT Kids today! Why don’t they know the basics of Greek and Latin? Either they don’t pay attention in class, or in many cases schools just don’t teach these classic languages of science anymore. For those who are Latin and Greek-challenged, noted (fictional) Victorian entomologist and explorer, Prof. J. Phineas Michaelson, will present English translations of the scientific names that have been given to some of the popular common arthropods available for public exhibits. This paper will explore how species get their names, as well as a brief look at some of the naturalists that named them. INTRODUCTION Our education system just isn’t what it used to be. Classic languages such as Latin and Greek are no longer a part of standard curriculum. Unfortunately, this puts modern students of science at somewhat of a disadvantage compared to our predecessors when it comes to scientific names. In the insectarium world, Latin and Greek names are used for the arthropods that we display, but for most young entomologists, these words are just a challenge to pronounce and lack meaning. Working with arthropods, we all know that Entomology is the study of these animals. Sounding similar but totally different, Etymology is the study of the origin of words, and the history of word meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera) (Excluding Anthribidae
    A FAUNAL SURVEY AND ZOOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE CURCULIONOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) (EXCLUDING ANTHRIBIDAE, PLATPODINAE. AND SCOLYTINAE) OF THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY OF TEXAS A Thesis TAMI ANNE CARLOW Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 1997 Major Subject; Entomology A FAUNAL SURVEY AND ZOOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE CURCVLIONOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) (EXCLUDING ANTHRIBIDAE, PLATYPODINAE. AND SCOLYTINAE) OF THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY OF TEXAS A Thesis by TAMI ANNE CARLOW Submitted to Texas AgcM University in partial fulltllment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved as to style and content by: Horace R. Burke (Chair of Committee) James B. Woolley ay, Frisbie (Member) (Head of Department) Gilbert L. Schroeter (Member) August 1997 Major Subject: Entomology A Faunal Survey and Zoogeographic Analysis of the Curculionoidea (Coleoptera) (Excluding Anthribidae, Platypodinae, and Scolytinae) of the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. (August 1997) Tami Anne Carlow. B.S. , Cornell University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Horace R. Burke An annotated list of the Curculionoidea (Coleoptem) (excluding Anthribidae, Platypodinae, and Scolytinae) is presented for the Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) of Texas. The list includes species that occur in Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and Wigacy counties. Each of the 23S species in 97 genera is tteated according to its geographical range. Lower Rio Grande distribution, seasonal activity, plant associations, and biology. The taxonomic atTangement follows O' Brien &, Wibmer (I og2). A table of the species occuning in patxicular areas of the Lower Rio Grande Valley, such as the Boca Chica Beach area, the Sabal Palm Grove Sanctuary, Bentsen-Rio Grande State Park, and the Falcon Dam area is included.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Utah Field Office Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Botanical Inventories and Monit
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Utah Field Office Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Botanical Inventories and Monitoring of Federally Listed, Proposed and Candidate Plants August 31, 2011 Jones cycladenia Daniela Roth, USFWS Barneby ridge-cress Holmgren milk-vetch Jessi Brunson, USFWS Daniela Roth, USFWS Uinta Basin hookless cactus Bekee Hotze, USFWS Last chance townsendia Daniela Roth, USFWS Dwarf bear-poppy Daniela Roth, USFWS INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE These guidelines were developed by the USFWS Utah Field Office to clarify our office’s minimum standards for botanical surveys for sensitive (federally listed, proposed and candidate) plant species (collectively referred to throughout this document as “target species”). Although developed with considerable input from various partners (agency and non-governmental personnel), these guidelines are solely intended to represent the recommendations of the USFWS Utah Field Office and should not be assumed to satisfy the expectations of any other entity. These guidelines are intended to strengthen the quality of information used by the USFWS in assessing the status, trends, and vulnerability of target species to a wide array of factors and known threats. We also intend that these guidelines will be helpful to those who conduct and fund surveys by providing up-front guidance regarding our expectations for survey protocols and data reporting. These are intended as general guidelines establishing minimum criteria; the USFWS Utah Field Office reserves the right to establish additional standards on a case-by-case basis. Note: The Vernal Field Office of the BLM requires specific qualifications for conducing botanical field work in their jurisdiction; nothing in this document should be interpreted as replacing requirements in place by that (or any other) agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened, Endangered, Candidate & Proposed Plant Species of Utah
    TECHNICAL NOTE USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho and Salt Lake City, Utah TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 52 MARCH 2011 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, CANDIDATE & PROPOSED PLANT SPECIES OF UTAH Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Loren St. John, PMC Team Leader, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Casey Burns, State Biologist, NRCS, Salt Lake City, Utah Last Chance Townsendia (Townsendia aprica). Photo by Megan Robinson. This technical note identifies the current threatened, endangered, candidate and proposed plant species listed by the U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service (USDI FWS) in Utah. Review your county list of threatened and endangered species and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Conservation Data Center (CDC) GIS T&E database to see if any of these species have been identified in your area of work. Additional information on these listed species can be found on the USDI FWS web site under “endangered species”. Consideration of these species during the planning process and determination of potential impacts related to scheduled work will help in the conservation of these rare plants. Contact your Plant Material Specialist, Plant Materials Center, State Biologist and Area Biologist for additional guidance on identification of these plants and NRCS responsibilities related to the Endangered Species Act. 2 Table of Contents Map of Utah Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Plant Species 4 Threatened & Endangered Species Profiles Arctomecon humilis Dwarf Bear-poppy ARHU3 6 Asclepias welshii Welsh’s Milkweed ASWE3 8 Astragalus ampullarioides Shivwits Milkvetch ASAM14 10 Astragalus desereticus Deseret Milkvetch ASDE2 12 Astragalus holmgreniorum Holmgren Milkvetch ASHO5 14 Astragalus limnocharis var.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Echinomastus Erectocentrus Var
    Vol. 78 Tuesday, No. 190 October 1, 2013 Part V Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Echinomastus erectocentrus var. acunensis (Acun˜a Cactus) and Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae (Fickeisen Plains Cactus) Throughout Their Ranges; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:36 Sep 30, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\01OCR4.SGM 01OCR4 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES4 60608 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (TDD) may call the Federal Information For the Fickeisen plains cactus, the Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. threats to the species and its habitat Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: result from habitat destruction, modification, and degradation from 50 CFR Part 17 Executive Summary livestock grazing (Factor A) in This document consists of a final rule combination with predation by small [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2012–0061; mammals (Factor C) and natural 4500030113] to list as endangered Echinomastus erectocentrus var. acunensis (acun˜ a environmental variability and the effects RIN 1018–AY51 cactus) and Pediocactus peeblesianus of climate such as drought. When var. fickeiseniae (Fickeisen plains combined with the above mentioned Endangered and Threatened Wildlife cactus) under the Act. For the remainder threats, small population size (Factor E) and Plants; Endangered Species of this document, these species will be likely exacerbates the effects of these Status for Echinomastus erectocentrus referred to by their common names. threats on the Fickeisen plains cactus.
    [Show full text]
  • DARKLING BEETLE Or STINK BEETLE Class Order Family Genus Species Insecta Coleoptera Tenebrionidae Eleodes Spp
    DARKLING BEETLE or STINK BEETLE Class Order Family Genus Species Insecta Coleoptera Tenebrionidae Eleodes spp Range: Found worldwide. 100 species in this genus in California. Habitat: Forests, grasslands, and deserts. Found under rocks and logs during the day. Niche: Herbivorous, terrestrial, nocturnal Diet: Wild: Scavenge on a wide variety of decaying and fresh plant and animal matter Zoo: Apple, monkey chow, lettuce Special Adaptations: The forewing (elytra) is fused so this beetle is flightless. They have chewing mouthparts and adults have a hard exoskeleton, smooth and black and are a little over an inch long. Antennae are thread-like, but some species’ are slightly enlarged at the terminal end and appear club-like. Darkling beetles undergo a complete metamorphosis. The eggs are laid in soil. The mealworm is the larval state of the darkling beetle and may molt 9-20 times. The adults will live 3-15 years. Compound eyes are kidney-shaped or notched rather than round. These beetles do not need to drink and can produce water metabolically; also their wings are fused to reduce water loss. Other: When disturbed, they will stand on their heads and elevate their rear end and emit a foul-smelling odor. This emission makes them unpalatable to would-be predators. Hence an alternate common name of “stink beetle”. They are sexually dimorphic. The cactus longhorn beetle mimics the darkling beetle because of the smell. Complete metamorphosis. ▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼ DERMESTID BEETLE or SKIN BEETLE Class Order Family Genus Species Insecta Coleoptera Dermestidae Dermestes maculatus Range: Worldwide distribution except Antarctica Habitat: on dead animals Niche: Scavengers, omnivorous, terrestrial Diet: Wild: dry animal or plant material such as skin or pollen, animal hair, feathers, dead insects and natural fibers Zoo: Special Adaptations: Undergo complete metamorphosis.
    [Show full text]
  • "Micropropagation of Members of the Cactaceae Subtribe Cactinae"
    J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 115(2):337-343. 1990. Micropropagation of Members of the Cactaceae Subtribe Cactinae Philip W. Clayton1, John F. Hubstenberger, and Gregory C. Phillips2 Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003- 0003 S. Ann Butler-Nance Department of Experimental Statistics, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003-0003 Additional index words. cactus, in vitro, Escobaria, Mamillaaria, Pediocactus, Sclerocactus, Toumeya Abstract. Micropropagation of 11 rare or endangered cacti species belonging to the subtribe Cactinae was achieved by rooting of proliferated axillary shoots. Shoot tip explants were obtained from seedlings of Escobaria missouriensis D.R. Hunt, E. robbinsorum (Earle) D.R. Hunt, Sclerocactus spinosior (Engelm.) Woodruff & L. Benson, and Toumeya papyracantha (Engelm.) Br. & Rose, and from mature plants of Mammillaria wrightii Engelm., Pediocactus bradyi L. Benson, P. despainii Welsh & Goodrich, P. knowltonii L. Benson, P. paradinei B.W. Benson, P. winkleri Heil, and S. mesae-verdae (Boissevain) L. Benson. Three or four species were used in each of a series of experiments investigating the effects of basal media and auxin and cytokinin types and concentrations on axillary shoot proliferation. Low or no auxin but moderate to high cytokinin concentrations were required for axillary shoot production. All species rooted spontaneously on hormone-free media; however, several species rooted better on media containing auxin. All species were re-established in the greenhouse. The propagation of native cacti is usually done with seed and painii, P. paradinei, P. winklerii, Toumeya papyracantha), rooted offshoots; however, conventional propagation methods threatened (E. robbinsorum, S. mesae-verdae), or endangered are inadequate for those species that exhibit no to few offshoots, (P.
    [Show full text]
  • PC20 Doc. 16.3 Annex 2
    PC20 Doc. 16.3 Annex 2 ASSESSMENT OF TRADE IN EPIPHYTIC CACTI AND REVIEW OF LISTING OF CACTACEAE SPP. IN APPENDIX II 1. This document has been prepared by Mr James Grogan under contract with the CITES Secretariat.1 2. Background information can be found in two key CITES documents: CoP15 Doc. 55, submitted by the Management Authority of Switzerland, describes the issue under consideration in this report, whether certain genera of epiphytic cacti (seven as listed below) should be excluded from Appendix II based on the preponderance of artificially propagated compared to wild- collected specimens in international trade; IUCN Red List conservation status is reviewed, and trade data for gross exports of wild-collected specimens from range nations during 1975–2008 are presented; PC19 Doc. 14.1, prepared by the Chair of the Working Group on the Periodic Review with assistance from the Scientific Authority of Mexico, presents further analysis of trade data during 1998–2008 including the number of specimens of epiphytic cacti in trade that were artificially propagated, number of records and specimens that were wild collected, confiscated or seized, or of unknown origin during this period, and geographic ranges of species in question. Natural range, morphology & taxonomy of the epiphytic cacti 3. The Cactaceae are a New World family except for one species, the epiphytic Rhipsalis baccifera, which is also found in Africa, Madagascar and as far east as Sri Lanka. Seven genera are considered here: Disocactus, Epiphyllum, Hatiora, Lepismium, PseudoRhipsalis, Rhipsalis, and Schlumbergera. 4. These genera are grouped in two tribes of the subfamily Cactoideae within the Cactaceae family: Hylocereeae: Disocactus, Epiphyllum, PseudoRhipsalis Rhipsalideae: Hatiora, Lepismium, Rhipsalis, Schlumbergera 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Cactaceae) with Special Emphasis on the Genus Mammillaria Charles A
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2003 Phylogenetic studies of Tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae) with special emphasis on the genus Mammillaria Charles A. Butterworth Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Butterworth, Charles A., "Phylogenetic studies of Tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae) with special emphasis on the genus Mammillaria " (2003). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 565. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/565 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobusch Fishhook Cactus Species Status Assessment - Final
    Tobusch Fishhook Cactus Species Status Assessment - Final SPECIES STATUS ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR TOBUSCH FISHHOOK CACTUS (SCLEROCACTUS BREVIHAMATUS SSP. TOBUSCHII (W.T. MARSHALL) N.P. TAYLOR) February, 2017 Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, NM Tobusch Fishhook Cactus Species Status Assessment - Final Prepared by Chris Best, Austin Ecological Services Field Office, Suggested citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Species status assessment of Tobusch Fishhook Cactus (Sclerocactus brevihamatus ssp. tobuschii (W.T. Marshall) N.P. Taylor). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southwest Region, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 65 pp. + 2 appendices. i Tobusch Fishhook Cactus Species Status Assessment - Final EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tobusch fishhook cactus is a small cactus, with curved “fishhook” spines, that is endemic to the Edwards Plateau of Texas. It was federally listed as endangered on November 7, 1979 (44 FR 64736) as Ancistrocactus tobuschii. At that time, fewer than 200 individuals had been documented from 4 sites. Tobusch fishhook cactus is now confirmed in 8 central Texas counties: Bandera, Edwards, Kerr, Kimble, Kinney, Real, Uvalde, and Val Verde. In recent years, over 4,000 individuals have been documented in surveys and monitoring plots. Recent phylogenetic evidence supports classifying Tobusch fishhook cactus as Sclerocactus brevihamatus ssp. tobuschii. It is distinguished morphologically from its closest relative, S. brevihamatus ssp. brevihamatus, on the basis of yellow versus pink- or brown-tinged flowers, fewer radial spines, and fewer ribs. Additionally, subspecies tobuschii is endemic to limestone outcrops of the Edwards Plateau, while subspecies brevihamatus occurs in alluvial soils in the Tamaulipan Shrublands and Chihuahuan Desert. A recent investigation found genetic divergence between the two subspecies, although they may interact genetically in a narrow area where their ranges overlap.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems and Pests of Agave, Aloe, Cactus and Yucca
    ARIZONA COOPERATIVE E TENSION Problems and Pests of Agave, Aloe, Cactus and Yucca AZ 1399 October 2008 Problems and Pests of Agave, Aloe, Cactus and Yucca Jack Kelly Commercial Horticulture Agent Pima County Cooperative Extension Mary Olsen Extension Plant Pathology Department of Plant Sciences This information has been reviewed by university faculty. cals.arizona.edu/pubs/garden/az1399.pdf AZ1399 Revised October 2008 (First published July 2006) Cooperative Extension College of Agriculture and Life Sciences The University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, James A. Christenson, Director, Cooperative Extension, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, The University of Arizona. The University of Arizona is an equal opportunity, affirmative action institution. The University does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, veteran status, or sexual orientation in its programs and activities. Table of Contents Abiotic (non-living) problems .............................................................................................................5 Selecting the correct plant and planting location .........................................................................5 Freeze Damage .........................................................................................................................5 Sunburn ....................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]