DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft RECOVERY PLAN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Winkler cactus (Pediocactus winkleri) AND San Rafael cactus (Pediocactus despainii) Draft RECOVERY PLAN December 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado DISCLAIMER Recovery plans use the best available information to identify reasonable actions for protecting and recovering listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, or others. Attainment of recovery objectives and availability of funds are subject to budgetary and other constraints as well as the need to address other priorities. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement for any Federal agency to obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341, or any other law or regulation. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views, official position, or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in plan formulation other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director. Approved plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. The literature citation for this document should read: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Winkler cactus (Pediocactus winkleri) and San Rafael cactus (Pediocactus despainii) recovery plan. Technical/agency draft. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado. xii + 133 pp. Additional copies of the draft document can be obtained from: Utah Ecological Services Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2369 West Orton Circle, Suite 50 West Valley City, Utah 84119 Phone: 801-975-3330 / Fax: 801-975-3331 Recovery plans can be downloaded from http://www.fws.gov/endangered/recovery/index.html. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This recovery plan was prepared through the collaborative efforts of Tracey Switek (Contractor), Tova Spector (Botanist, USFWS Utah Ecological Services Field Office), Paul Abate (Supervisory Aquatics and Plant Biologist, USFWS Utah Ecological Services Field Office), and Laura Romin (Deputy Field Supervisor, USFWS Utah Ecological Services Field Office). In our efforts to move through the recovery planning process as efficiently as possible, the oversight, guidance, and review provided by Seth Willey (Acting Regional ESA Chief, USFWS Region 6) and Kevin Burgess (Fish & Wildlife Biologist, Region 6 Regional Office) has been vital. In our efforts to establish an effective recovery program for Winkler cactus and San Rafael cactus, the USFWS has benefited greatly from contributions of many individuals and agencies who participated in recovery meetings, provided information and review, and supported our efforts to draft and finalize this Plan. We would particularly like thank representatives from the BLM Richfield and Price Field Offices, the BLM State Office, and Capital Reef National Park as well as the following individuals for their participation and guidance: Ron Bolander, Sandra Borthwick, Deborah Clark, Tom Clark, Robert Fitts, Karl Ivory, Leigh Johnson, Jennifer Lewinsohn, Rita Reisor, Dustin Rooks, Daniela Roth, Vincent Tepedino, and Dana Truman. The Plan also benefitted from much appreciated contributions of photographs by Dustin Rooks, Daniela Roth, Tova Spector, and Dana Truman. Much-needed GIS support was provided by Brent Jorgensen. iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Current Species Status: Winkler cactus was listed as threatened in 1998 with a Recovery Priority Number of 11 (see Table 2) and San Rafael cactus was listed as endangered in 1987 with a Recovery Priority Number of 11C (see Table 2) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Winkler cactus (Pediocactus winkleri) and San Rafael cactus (Pediocactus despainii) occur in south-central Utah. The two species are closely related with a blending of morphological characteristics where their ranges meet. For management purposes those individuals found in Emery County are considered San Rafael cactus and those found in Wayne County or Sevier County are considered Winkler cactus. Distribution and Range: Both species occur primarily on federal lands, including lands managed by the Price and Richfield Field Offices (FO) of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and on Capitol Reef National Park (CRNP). Both species have also been found on land owned by the State of Utah and managed by the School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA). Winkler cactus comprises four known populations (three in Wayne County and one in the southeast corner of Sevier County) and a total of 5,411 documented individuals (NatureServe 2004). San Rafael cactus comprises twenty-one known populations, all in Emery County and a total of 8,159 documented individuals. New populations of both species were identified as recently as 2013, suggesting that additional populations of both species may remain to be discovered. Many of the threats facing these species are the same, and actions required to manage the species and reduce threats are similar. Habitat Requirements: Winkler cactus is endemic to specific, fine textured soils derived from the Dakota formation and Morrison formation in the lower Fremont River in Wayne County and southeast Sevier Counties of south-central Utah. It is generally found at elevations between 1,500 - 2,130 meters (m) (4,900 - 7,000 feet (ft)) on rocky, alkaline hill tops and benches, and gentle slopes on barren, open sites in salt desert shrub communities. These communities are associated with species such as Indian rice grass (Achnatherum hymenoides), blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), curly grass (Pleuraphis jamesii), alkali sacaton (Sporobolus airoides), sand hill muhly (Muhlenbergia pungens), prickly pear cactus (Opuntia polyacantha), Mormon tea (Ephedra torreyana), little-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus intricatus), shadscale (Atriplex confertifolia), four-wing salt bush (Atriplex canescens var. canescens), phlox (Phlox spp.), locoweed (Astragalus spp.), halogeton (Halogeton glomeratus), snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae), and viscid rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus). It is also found among piñon- juniper (Pinus edulis-Juniperus osteosperma) woodland stands (Clark 2008; Welsh et al. 2003). San Rafael cactus grows in a wide variety of soils, although it may favor fine textured mildly alkaline soils rich in calcium and derived from limestone substrates of the Carmel Formation and the Sinbad member of the Moenkopi formation. It has also been found on shale barrens of the Brushy Basin member of the Morrison, Carmel, Mancos and Dakota geologic formations and in areas of primarily alluvial and colluvium soils. The species most commonly occurs on benches, v hill tops, and gentle slopes, and most abundantly on sites with a south exposure at elevations of 1450-2080 m (4760-6820 ft). San Rafael cactus populations are a component of the vegetative community occurring at the lower elevations of a piñon-juniper woodland plant community and the upper elevations of a galleta three awn shrub-steppe community of the Canyonlands section of the Colorado Plateau Floristic Division. The vegetative community is characterized by open woodlands of scattered Utah juniper and piñon pine with an understory of shrubs and grasses within the Colorado Plateau (Clark 2008; Welsh et al. 2003). Factors Limiting Viability: We consider livestock grazing and climate change to be high-level threats to Winkler cactus. Moderate-level threats to Winkler cactus are off-highway vehicle (OHV)-related activities, illegal collection, and the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms. Low-level threats are native ungulate disturbance, invasive species, predation, and energy and mineral development. We consider off-highway vehicle (OHV)-related activities, livestock grazing, energy and mineral development, and climate change to be high-level threats to San Rafael cactus. Moderate-level threats to San Rafael cactus are illegal collection, and the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms. Low-level threats are native ungulate and wild horse disturbance, invasive species, predation, and energy and mineral development. Recovery Plan: This recovery plan includes Parts 1 through 5. Part 1 of this plan includes the biological and status information pertinent to recovering both cactus species. Part 2 presents a general strategy for achieving the species’ long-term recovery in the wild. Part 3 outlines the recovery goals, objectives, and criteria specific to each cactus and describes the action program for achieving recovery objectives. Part 4 provides a schedule for implementing each action. Part 5 provides the references used in compiling this document. Recovery of these species is in an early stage; thus, it should be anticipated that the recovery program will change over time as informed by new information and the outcomes of implementing recovery actions. The recovery plan will be revised when needed to reflect changes in information, strategies, and/or actions. Recovery Strategy: Recovery of Winkler cactus and San Rafael cactus will hinge on conserving extant populations, primarily by abating threats such as illegal collection, grazing impacts, OHV related disturbances and through demonstration of increasing trends within existing populations or additional populations to ensure long-term demographic and genetic viability. Recovery of the Winkler and San Rafael cactus will include: (1) the sustained and stable
Recommended publications
  • Reproductive Biology, Hybridization, and Flower Visitors of Rare Sclerocactus Taxa in Utah's Uintah Basin

    Reproductive Biology, Hybridization, and Flower Visitors of Rare Sclerocactus Taxa in Utah's Uintah Basin

    Western North American Naturalist Volume 70 Number 3 Article 10 10-11-2010 Reproductive biology, hybridization, and flower visitors of rare Sclerocactus taxa in Utah's Uintah Basin Vincent J. Tepedino Utah State University, Logan, [email protected] Terry L. Griswold Utah State University, Logan, [email protected] William R. Bowlin Utah State University, Logan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Tepedino, Vincent J.; Griswold, Terry L.; and Bowlin, William R. (2010) "Reproductive biology, hybridization, and flower visitors of rare Sclerocactus taxa in Utah's Uintah Basin," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 70 : No. 3 , Article 10. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol70/iss3/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 70(3), © 2010, pp. 377–386 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, HYBRIDIZATION, AND FLOWER VISITORS OF RARE SCLEROCACTUS TAXA IN UTAH’S UINTAH BASIN Vincent J. Tepedino1,2, Terry L. Griswold1, and William R. Bowlin1,3 ABSTRACT.—We studied the mating system and flower visitors of 2 threatened species of Sclerocactus (Cactaceae) in the Uintah Basin of eastern Utah—an area undergoing rapid energy development. We found that both S. wetlandicus and S. brevispinus are predominantly outcrossed and are essentially self-incompatible. A third presumptive taxon (unde- scribed; here called S. wetlandicus-var1) is fully self-compatible but cannot produce seeds unless the flowers are visited by pollinators.
  • Elaboración De Una Guía Ilustrada De Cactáceas En Honduras

    Elaboración De Una Guía Ilustrada De Cactáceas En Honduras

    Elaboración de una guía ilustrada de Cactáceas en Honduras Juan Pablo Schulze Rojas ZAMORANO Carrera de Desarrollo Socioeconómico y Ambiente Diciembre, 2004 i Elaboración de una guía ilustrada de Cactáceas en Honduras Proyecto especial presentado como requisito parcial para optar al título de Ingeniero en Desarrollo Socioeconómico y Ambiente en el Grado Académico de Licenciatura. Presentado por: Juan Pablo Schulze Rojas Honduras Diciembre, 2004 ii El autor concede a Zamorano permiso para reproducir y distribuir copias de este trabajo para fines educativos. Para otras personas físicas o jurídicas se reservan los derechos de autor. ________________________________ Juan Pablo Schulze Rojas Honduras Diciembre, 2004 iii Elaboración de una guía ilustrada de Cactáceas en Honduras Presentado por Juan Pablo Schulze Rojas Aprobada: __________________________ __________________________ José L. Linares, Ing. Agr. Mayra Falck, M.Sc. Asesor Principal Coordinadora de la Carrera de Desarrollo Socioeconómico y Ambiente __________________________ __________________________ George Pilz, Ph.D. Aurelio Revilla, M.S.A. Asesor Decano Académico Interino __________________________ Kenneth L. Hoadley, D.B.A. Rector iv DEDICATORIA A mi mamá Toya. A mi papá Juanca. A mi hermano Javier. A Claire. A mis abuelitos. A mis compañeros. A todos los que me apoyaron. A la naturaleza. A la esperanza por la PAZ. v AGRADECIMIENTOS A José L. Linares, por su asesoría, alegría y buena cocina. Al Dr. Pilz, por la tranquilidad. A mis padres, por todo su gran apoyo, soporte, aguante y cariño brindado. A Javier por ser mi hermano. A los clanes Rojas y Muñoz-Reyes, por haberme acogido. A los Babos, por ser un ejemplo de valores. A la Mimi, por su alegría.
  • December 2012 Number 1

    December 2012 Number 1

    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Utah Field Office Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Botanical Inventories and Monit

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Utah Field Office Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Botanical Inventories and Monit

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Utah Field Office Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Botanical Inventories and Monitoring of Federally Listed, Proposed and Candidate Plants August 31, 2011 Jones cycladenia Daniela Roth, USFWS Barneby ridge-cress Holmgren milk-vetch Jessi Brunson, USFWS Daniela Roth, USFWS Uinta Basin hookless cactus Bekee Hotze, USFWS Last chance townsendia Daniela Roth, USFWS Dwarf bear-poppy Daniela Roth, USFWS INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE These guidelines were developed by the USFWS Utah Field Office to clarify our office’s minimum standards for botanical surveys for sensitive (federally listed, proposed and candidate) plant species (collectively referred to throughout this document as “target species”). Although developed with considerable input from various partners (agency and non-governmental personnel), these guidelines are solely intended to represent the recommendations of the USFWS Utah Field Office and should not be assumed to satisfy the expectations of any other entity. These guidelines are intended to strengthen the quality of information used by the USFWS in assessing the status, trends, and vulnerability of target species to a wide array of factors and known threats. We also intend that these guidelines will be helpful to those who conduct and fund surveys by providing up-front guidance regarding our expectations for survey protocols and data reporting. These are intended as general guidelines establishing minimum criteria; the USFWS Utah Field Office reserves the right to establish additional standards on a case-by-case basis. Note: The Vernal Field Office of the BLM requires specific qualifications for conducing botanical field work in their jurisdiction; nothing in this document should be interpreted as replacing requirements in place by that (or any other) agency.
  • Threatened, Endangered, Candidate & Proposed Plant Species of Utah

    Threatened, Endangered, Candidate & Proposed Plant Species of Utah

    TECHNICAL NOTE USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho and Salt Lake City, Utah TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 52 MARCH 2011 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, CANDIDATE & PROPOSED PLANT SPECIES OF UTAH Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Loren St. John, PMC Team Leader, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Casey Burns, State Biologist, NRCS, Salt Lake City, Utah Last Chance Townsendia (Townsendia aprica). Photo by Megan Robinson. This technical note identifies the current threatened, endangered, candidate and proposed plant species listed by the U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service (USDI FWS) in Utah. Review your county list of threatened and endangered species and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Conservation Data Center (CDC) GIS T&E database to see if any of these species have been identified in your area of work. Additional information on these listed species can be found on the USDI FWS web site under “endangered species”. Consideration of these species during the planning process and determination of potential impacts related to scheduled work will help in the conservation of these rare plants. Contact your Plant Material Specialist, Plant Materials Center, State Biologist and Area Biologist for additional guidance on identification of these plants and NRCS responsibilities related to the Endangered Species Act. 2 Table of Contents Map of Utah Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Plant Species 4 Threatened & Endangered Species Profiles Arctomecon humilis Dwarf Bear-poppy ARHU3 6 Asclepias welshii Welsh’s Milkweed ASWE3 8 Astragalus ampullarioides Shivwits Milkvetch ASAM14 10 Astragalus desereticus Deseret Milkvetch ASDE2 12 Astragalus holmgreniorum Holmgren Milkvetch ASHO5 14 Astragalus limnocharis var.
  • Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Echinomastus Erectocentrus Var

    Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Echinomastus Erectocentrus Var

    Vol. 78 Tuesday, No. 190 October 1, 2013 Part V Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Echinomastus erectocentrus var. acunensis (Acun˜a Cactus) and Pediocactus peeblesianus var. fickeiseniae (Fickeisen Plains Cactus) Throughout Their Ranges; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:36 Sep 30, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\01OCR4.SGM 01OCR4 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES4 60608 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (TDD) may call the Federal Information For the Fickeisen plains cactus, the Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. threats to the species and its habitat Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: result from habitat destruction, modification, and degradation from 50 CFR Part 17 Executive Summary livestock grazing (Factor A) in This document consists of a final rule combination with predation by small [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2012–0061; mammals (Factor C) and natural 4500030113] to list as endangered Echinomastus erectocentrus var. acunensis (acun˜ a environmental variability and the effects RIN 1018–AY51 cactus) and Pediocactus peeblesianus of climate such as drought. When var. fickeiseniae (Fickeisen plains combined with the above mentioned Endangered and Threatened Wildlife cactus) under the Act. For the remainder threats, small population size (Factor E) and Plants; Endangered Species of this document, these species will be likely exacerbates the effects of these Status for Echinomastus erectocentrus referred to by their common names. threats on the Fickeisen plains cactus.
  • Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants

    Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants

    35906 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 118 / Monday, June 20, 2011 / Notices Screen outs Stayers Movers ALL MODES Total Number Responses ..................................................................................................... 8572 ........................ ........................ Total Burden Hours .............................................................................................................. 602 ........................ ........................ Status of the proposed information FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act requires us to collection: Continuing under current request information, see ‘‘VIII. review each listed species’ status at least authorization. Contacts.’’ Individuals who are hearing once every 5 years. Then, under section Authority: Section 8(C)(1) of the United impaired or speech impaired may call 4(c)(2)(B), we determine whether to States Housing Act of 1937. the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877– remove any species from the List 8337 for TTY (telephone typewriter or (delist), to reclassify it from endangered Dated: June 9, 2011. teletypewriter) assistance. to threatened, or to reclassify it from Raphael W. Bostic, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are threatened to endangered. Any change Assistant Secretary for Policy Development initiating 5-year status reviews under in Federal classification requires a & Research. the Act of 2 animal and 10 plant separate rulemaking process. [FR Doc. 2011–15275 Filed 6–17–11; 8:45 am] species: Autumn buttercup (Ranunculus In classifying,
  • Clover's Cactus Transplant Data Review

    Clover's Cactus Transplant Data Review

    PETITION TO LIST THE Clover’s Cactus (Sclerocactus cloverae) UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Clover’s cactus. Photo: Robert Sivinski Petition Submitted to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior, Acting through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Petitioner: WildEarth Guardians Address correspondence to: Taylor Jones [email protected] (720) 443-2615 May 29, 2020 INTRODUCTION WildEarth Guardians (Guardians) respectfully requests that the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) list Clover’s cactus (Sclerocactus cloverae) as “threatened” or “endangered” under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) (16 U.S.C. §§ 1531- 1544). Guardians also requests that the Service designate critical habitat for the species concurrent with listing. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT AND IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS The ESA, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1544, was enacted in 1973 “to provide a means whereby the ecosystems upon which endangered species and threatened species depend may be conserved, [and] to provide a program for the conservation of such endangered species and threatened species.” 16 U.S.C. § 1531(b). The protections of the ESA only apply to species that have been listed as endangered or threatened according to the provisions of the statute. The ESA delegates authority to determine whether a species should be listed as endangered or threatened to the Secretary of Interior, who has in turn delegated authority to the Director of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. As defined in the ESA, an “endangered” species is one that is “in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” 16 U.S.C.
  • Draft RECOVERY PLAN

    Draft RECOVERY PLAN

    Winkler cactus (Pediocactus winkleri) AND San Rafael cactus (Pediocactus despainii) Draft RECOVERY PLAN December 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado DISCLAIMER Recovery plans use the best available information to identify reasonable actions for protecting and recovering listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, or others. Attainment of recovery objectives and availability of funds are subject to budgetary and other constraints as well as the need to address other priorities. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement for any Federal agency to obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341, or any other law or regulation. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views, official position, or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in plan formulation other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director. Approved plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. The literature citation for this document should read: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Winkler cactus (Pediocactus winkleri) and San Rafael cactus (Pediocactus despainii) recovery plan. Technical/agency draft. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado. xii + 133 pp. Additional copies of the draft document can be obtained from: Utah Ecological Services Office U.S.
  • "Micropropagation of Members of the Cactaceae Subtribe Cactinae"

    "Micropropagation of Members of the Cactaceae Subtribe Cactinae"

    J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 115(2):337-343. 1990. Micropropagation of Members of the Cactaceae Subtribe Cactinae Philip W. Clayton1, John F. Hubstenberger, and Gregory C. Phillips2 Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003- 0003 S. Ann Butler-Nance Department of Experimental Statistics, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003-0003 Additional index words. cactus, in vitro, Escobaria, Mamillaaria, Pediocactus, Sclerocactus, Toumeya Abstract. Micropropagation of 11 rare or endangered cacti species belonging to the subtribe Cactinae was achieved by rooting of proliferated axillary shoots. Shoot tip explants were obtained from seedlings of Escobaria missouriensis D.R. Hunt, E. robbinsorum (Earle) D.R. Hunt, Sclerocactus spinosior (Engelm.) Woodruff & L. Benson, and Toumeya papyracantha (Engelm.) Br. & Rose, and from mature plants of Mammillaria wrightii Engelm., Pediocactus bradyi L. Benson, P. despainii Welsh & Goodrich, P. knowltonii L. Benson, P. paradinei B.W. Benson, P. winkleri Heil, and S. mesae-verdae (Boissevain) L. Benson. Three or four species were used in each of a series of experiments investigating the effects of basal media and auxin and cytokinin types and concentrations on axillary shoot proliferation. Low or no auxin but moderate to high cytokinin concentrations were required for axillary shoot production. All species rooted spontaneously on hormone-free media; however, several species rooted better on media containing auxin. All species were re-established in the greenhouse. The propagation of native cacti is usually done with seed and painii, P. paradinei, P. winklerii, Toumeya papyracantha), rooted offshoots; however, conventional propagation methods threatened (E. robbinsorum, S. mesae-verdae), or endangered are inadequate for those species that exhibit no to few offshoots, (P.
  • Proposal for Amendment of Appendix I Or II for CITES Cop16

    Proposal for Amendment of Appendix I Or II for CITES Cop16

    Original language: English CoP17 Prop. XXX CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa), 24 September – 5 October 2016 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal Transfer of fishhook cacti Sclerocactus spinosior ssp. blainei (= Sclerocactus blainei), Sclerocactus cloverae (CITES-listed synonym of Sclerocactus parviflorus), and Sclerocactus sileri from Appendix II to Appendix I, as per the outcome of the CITES Periodic Review of the Appendices, in accordance with Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP16), Annex 1, paragraph B) iii): Populations are restricted and are characterized by a high vulnerability to intrinsic and extrinsic factors and an observed, inferred, or projected decrease in the number of subpopulations and the number of individuals. Nomenclature amendment to the Appendix-I listing of Sclerocactus glaucus, formerly treated as a complex, to three distinct species: Sclerocactus glaucus, Sclerocactus brevispinus, and Sclerocactus wetlandicus (the last two are CITES-listed synonyms of S. glaucus), as per the outcome of a Periodic Review of the Appendices. The three species continue to meet the criteria for Appendix I in accordance with Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP16), Annex 1, paragraph B) iii): Populations are restricted and are characterized by a high vulnerability to intrinsic and extrinsic factors and an observed, inferred, or projected decrease in the number of subpopulations and the number of individuals. B. Proponent United States of America* C. Supporting statement 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Magnoliopsida 1.2 Order: Caryophyllales 1.3 Family: Cactaceae 1.4 Genus, species or subspecies, including author and year: The scientific names Sclerocactus blainei (CITES-listed Sclerocactus spinosior ssp.
  • PC20 Doc. 16.3 Annex 2

    PC20 Doc. 16.3 Annex 2

    PC20 Doc. 16.3 Annex 2 ASSESSMENT OF TRADE IN EPIPHYTIC CACTI AND REVIEW OF LISTING OF CACTACEAE SPP. IN APPENDIX II 1. This document has been prepared by Mr James Grogan under contract with the CITES Secretariat.1 2. Background information can be found in two key CITES documents: CoP15 Doc. 55, submitted by the Management Authority of Switzerland, describes the issue under consideration in this report, whether certain genera of epiphytic cacti (seven as listed below) should be excluded from Appendix II based on the preponderance of artificially propagated compared to wild- collected specimens in international trade; IUCN Red List conservation status is reviewed, and trade data for gross exports of wild-collected specimens from range nations during 1975–2008 are presented; PC19 Doc. 14.1, prepared by the Chair of the Working Group on the Periodic Review with assistance from the Scientific Authority of Mexico, presents further analysis of trade data during 1998–2008 including the number of specimens of epiphytic cacti in trade that were artificially propagated, number of records and specimens that were wild collected, confiscated or seized, or of unknown origin during this period, and geographic ranges of species in question. Natural range, morphology & taxonomy of the epiphytic cacti 3. The Cactaceae are a New World family except for one species, the epiphytic Rhipsalis baccifera, which is also found in Africa, Madagascar and as far east as Sri Lanka. Seven genera are considered here: Disocactus, Epiphyllum, Hatiora, Lepismium, PseudoRhipsalis, Rhipsalis, and Schlumbergera. 4. These genera are grouped in two tribes of the subfamily Cactoideae within the Cactaceae family: Hylocereeae: Disocactus, Epiphyllum, PseudoRhipsalis Rhipsalideae: Hatiora, Lepismium, Rhipsalis, Schlumbergera 5.