DOCSLIB.ORG

Jeff Jarvis, “Before Trust in Media: Trust in Facts, Institutions and Each Other,”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jeff Jarvis, “Before Trust in Media: Trust in Facts, Institutions and Each Other,” Before trust in media: Trust in facts, institutions and each other Jeff Jarvis Tow-Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism Graduate School of Journalism City University of New York Asking how to bring trust to American media may be the wrong question and perhaps only a collateral outcome of the real tasks at hand. To protect democracy and society, we must first restore citizens’ trust in facts, diminishing the influence of those who would manipulate information and emotions. We must restore trust and respect among communities so citizens might conduct civil, credible, and productive public conversation. We also need to restore trust in certain challenged institutions — from science to education, government to democracy. Then, rather than changing citizens’ attitudes toward the institution of media, isn’t it media that should change to earn back public trust? It is a mistake to view “fake news” and “hate speech” as commodities — like content — that can be controlled by media, technology platforms, or government. Our problem is human behavior. Data & Society’s excellent report, “Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online,”1 catalogues the manipulators: trolls, the alt-right, gamergaters, the so-called men’s rights movement. Their methods have much in common with Russian manipulation as laid out in NATO’s “Handbook of Russian Information Warfare.”2 Their motives are also similar: “Our media, our tools, and our politics are being leveraged to help breed polarization,” says3 Data & Society founder danah boyd. “Sometimes, it’s for the lulz. Sometimes, the goals are much more disturbing.” Sometimes, it is to bring down institutions, even nations. At the highest level, these manipulators attack truth. “Multiple untruths, not necessarily consistent, are in part designed to undermine trust in the existence of objective truth, whether from media or from official sources,” says NATO [with my emphasis]. “This contributes to eroding the comparative advantages of liberal democratic societies when seeking to counter disinformation.” How do we fight a war for truth? Fact-checking is necessary but insufficient. As Data & Society cautions, the bad guys feed on the fight. When we debunk them, we play into their hands by simultaneously spreading their message. This is the insidious paradox of fake news. As the RAND Corporation points out in “The Russian ‘Firehose of Falsehood’ Propaganda Model,”4 the forces of fake have the advantage of speed (it takes no time to make up lies) and volume (it costs nothing to spread them). Thus, they set the public agenda and we are stuck playing catch up in their game. 1 Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis, “Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online,” Data & Society Research Institute. https://datasociety.net/pubs/oh/DataAndSociety_MediaManipulationAndDisinformationOnline.pdf 2 Keir Giles, “Handbook of Russian Information Warfare,” Nato Defense College, November 2016. http://www.ndc.nato.int/download/downloads.php?icode=506 3 danah boyd, “Google and Facebook Can’t Just Make Fake News Disappear,” Wired, March 27, 2017. https://www.wired.com/2017/03/google-and-facebook-cant-just-make-fake-news-disappear/ 4 Christopher Paul and Miriam Mathews, “The Russian ‘Firehose of Falsebood’ Propaganda Model,” RAND, 2016. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE198.html 1 News literacy is another weapon often called upon today, but I will argue that it, too, is inadequate. News literacy is media-centric and often self-serving. It does not grapple with the harsh truth that vast swaths of America — for various reasons — do not trust news or its purveyors. So where do we turn? What do can citizens, platforms, and media do? With citizens, I am coming to believe that our ultimate goal is to promote civility. Can we, in Dan Gillmor’s words,5 make spreading lies uncool? Can we promote responsible sharing? The internet is yet young and society is just beginning to renegotiate social norms around it. Will people come to understand the impact of their twisted ways before it is too late? (Witness courtroom photos6 of sobbing Americans caught spewing racist hate; it is as if they are transported back to a land of decency from a nation hypnotized by manipulation of fear.) Such a civil impulse is a necessary precondition to the exercise of critical judgment fed by fact and journalism. What can technology platforms do? They can no more fix the problem with magic algorithms than they caused it. The internet has been a conduit for the release of perhaps centuries of frustration with institutions that did not listen to, represent, and serve communities whose members have been lumped together as a faceless, voiceless mass. The mass, let us confess, is media’s creation. As we make demands of the technologists, we need to keep in mind all the good the net unleashes: connections, creativity, empowerment, a magnificent symphony of diverse voices that only some see as a fearsome challenge to their dwindling power. We must not descend into a moral technopanic, blaming technology for revealing society’s ills and attempting to limit its opportunities before we even know what they could be. That said, there is much the platforms can and should do, and they are beginning to do it. Google’s head of search engineering, Ben Gomes, recently said7 that search’s ranking algorithm will now take into account the reliability, authority, and quality of sources. That is, in responding to the query, “is climate change real?” the search engine now favors the institution of science over the speculations of conspiracy theorists. Mark Zuckerberg has said that he wants8 Facebook to favor good over bad as it now turns its attention to helping build communities. Both companies — along with brands, agencies, and ad networks — promise to help cut off the economic air supply to hate and fraud. We can support this flight to quality. I also want to see all the platforms transparently map the manipulation aimed at them — thus us — by sharing data with researchers and media so that we can all compensate for and deflect its impact on the news. I want to see Facebook and especially Twitter wipe out the ability to create the fake accounts and bots manipulators enlist to spread their bile. Though no one — least of all 5 Dan Gillmor, “News Literacy Working Group; Initial Thoughts,” March 9, 2017. http://dangillmor.com/2017/03/09/news-literacy-working-group-initial-thoughts/ 6 See https://twitter.com/briskwalk/status/885576468822151170 7 Ben Gomes, “Our latest quality improvements for Search,” Google blog, April 25, 2017. https://www.blog.google/products/search/our-latest-quality-improvements-search/ 8 Mark Zuckerberg, “Building Global Community,” Facebook, February 16, 2017. https://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-zuckerberg/building-global-community/10154544292806634 2 the platforms — wants technologists to become the editors and censors of the world, I do want them to recognize their public responsibility in the rules they make, favoring civility when possible. Finally, I dream that Facebook could create a safe space in which people of every background and worldview could tell their stories so we could meet each other, making the stranger less strange and robbing the manipulators of their most lethal weapon: fear of the Other. As for media, we have the most work to do. Like the platforms, we need to better understand the manipulation aimed at us so we avoid supporting it. We must learn to listen to the great diversity of communities that have not been reflected and heard through our pages and screens, understanding, empathizing with, and serving their needs and goals. That is the path to trust. I believe we should concentrate on building diversity not just in newsrooms but in the larger news ecosystem, investing in and supporting new news outlets that serve many communities: African-American youth, Latino workers, LGBTQ families, and, yes, the conservatives who lost their trust in news media starting in the ‘70s, whom liberal media (let us please concede our worldview) abandoned to a vacuum filled by talk radio, Fox News, Breitbart, Drudge, InfoWars, and worse. We need to share power with the people — to borrow Jay Rosen’s phrase9 — formerly known as the audience, recognizing that journalism is a service to them that begins with their needs. (See, for example, Hearken,10 a platform that allows the public to assign journalists to answer their information needs.) We should learn new skills in convening communities in conflict into civil and informed conversation. (See Spaceship Media’s experiment11 with AL.com, using Facebook to convene Trump voters and Clinton voters to conversation. They still disagreed, but they came to ask journalists for facts to inform their conversation; they trusted journalism.) We need to learn how to take journalism to the public conversation where it occurs, no longer depending on the notion that we control media as destinations. Through this, we will learn how to share journalism in many new forms: as tools, data bases, classes, convenings, and fact-filled memes. Rather than playing catch up to the manipulators, RAND suggests we must get ahead of them, making it our mission to educate and inform the public so well that we inoculate them against lies. (See, for example, how the manipulators are starting to attack the Census.) We must leave the presumptions of mass media behind, abandoning the moral corruption of clickbait as we seek new forms that serve people as individuals and members of communities 9 Jay Rosen, “The People Formerly Known as the Audience,” Pressthink, June 27, 2006. http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr_p.html 10 See https://www.wearehearken.com/ 11 See http://spaceshipmedia.org/projects/ 3 and new business models that reward relevance, value, and quality, without building walls around journalism to serve only the privileged elite.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Feedback and Input on the Facebook Oversight Board for Content Decisions Appendix
    Global Feedback and Input on the Facebook Oversight Board for Content Decisions Appendix Appendix A 02 Appendix B 07 Appendix C 26 Appendix D 100 Appendix E 138 Appendix F 177 APPENDIX A Draft Charter: An Oversight Board for Content Decisions Every day, teams at Facebook make difficult decisions about Facebook takes responsibility for our content decisions, what content should stay up and what should come down policies and the values we use to make them The purpose of the board is to provide oversight of how we exercise that As our community has grown to more than 2 billion people, responsibility and to make Facebook more accountable we have come to believe that Facebook should not make so many of those decisions on its own — that people should be The following draft raises questions and considerations, while able to request an appeal of our content decisions to an providing a suggested approach that constitutes a model for independent body the board’s structure, scope and authority It is a starting point for discussion on how the board should be designed To do that, we are creating an external board The board will and formed What the draft does not do is answer every be a body of independent experts who will review Facebook’s proposed question completely or finally most challenging content decisions - focusing on important and disputed cases It will share its decisions transparently and We are actively seeking contributions, opinions and give reasons for them perspectives from around the world on each of the questions outlined below
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook's Newsfeed Changes
    LSE Business Review: Facebook’s newsfeed changes: a disaster or an opportunity for news publishers? Page 1 of 6 Facebook’s newsfeed changes: a disaster or an opportunity for news publishers? Social media and digital executives in newsrooms already have a tough job connecting their content to consumers via social media, but Facebook’s proposed changes in the algorithms of its ‘newsfeed’ are going to make it a lot harder. Social networks offer immense opportunities for reaching vast new audiences and increasing the engagement of users with journalism. The most important platform in the world is about to make that more difficult. Clearly, this is a blow for news publishers who have spent the last decade or so fighting a battle for survival in a world where people’s attention and advertising have shifted to other forms of content and away from news media brand’s own sites. They are clearly very concerned. Yet, could this be a wake-up call that will mean the better, most adaptive news brands benefit? The Atlantic’s Franklin Foer even argues that this is a good thing that could be the move that ends news media’s dependency on advertising and platforms like Facebook: “Facebook has just done media the biggest favor of them all. It has forced media to face the fact that digital advertising and ever-growing web traffic will never sustain the industry, especially if that traffic comes from monopolies like Facebook hoping to claim the entirety of digital advertising dollars for themselves.” I’m not going to argue that this is great news for news publishers, but blind panic or cynical abuse of Facebook is not a sufficient response.
    [Show full text]
  • Can "Anonymous" Take Down the Internet?
    Security Now! Transcript of Episode #341 Page 1 of 26 Transcript of Episode #341 Can "Anonymous" Take Down the Internet? Description: This week, after catching up with the week's security and privacy news, Steve and Leo examine the feasibility of the hacker group "Anonymous" successfully taking the Internet offline after a disavowed Internet posting has claimed they intend on March 31st. High quality (64 kbps) mp3 audio file URL: http://media.GRC.com/sn/SN-341.mp3 Quarter size (16 kbps) mp3 audio file URL: http://media.GRC.com/sn/sn-341-lq.mp3 SHOW TEASE: It's time for Security Now!. Steve Gibson is here, and we are going to get in a fight over Google, Apple, and the iOS cookie incident. That and a look at why Anonymous may or may not be able to take down the Internet next month. It's all coming up next on Security Now!. Leo Laporte: This is Security Now! with Steve Gibson, Episode 341, recorded February 22, 2012: The Anonymous Threat. Time to protect yourself online with - boy, there couldn't be a better time for this show - Security Now!. Steve Gibson is here, the Explainer in Chief. And, well, first of all, welcome, Steve. Good to talk to you. Steve Gibson: Thank you, Leo. Our recorded audience don't know that you and I have spent the last 30 minutes talking about coffee, before we pressed the Record button. Leo: And we're feeling so good now. Steve: And we're a little self-conscious about whether they would not have enjoyed our exploration as much as we did.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating the New Media Landscape
    IPI ReportProduced in Partnership with Uhe Poynter Institute Brave News Worlds Navigating the New Media Landscape Preface or the past three years, discussions about the future of the news media have centered Fon the decline of the so-called golden age of journalism and the descent into a chaos characterised by splintered audiences, decimated balance sheets, and the muscling-in of amateurs. Fearing that their halcyon days as the guardians of information are num- bered, many editors and journalists have engaged in collective navel-gazing, asking themselves: What went wrong? But is the future really so bleak? Is the decline a global phenomenon? Are we moving into a new ‘golden age’? And what does it mean for press freedom? To find answers to these pressing questions, the International Press Institute teamed up with the Poynter Institute, one of the premier journalism training centers in the world, to set out on a global investigation assembling an international group of editors, jour- nalists, visionaries and sceptics to discover how the future of the news is developing around the world. The result is that after a 10-year absence, the IPI Report series has returned, revamped and reinvigorated with a new edition entitled “Brave News Worlds”, a report that charts the exciting times ahead for the news media and uncovers the many different global perspectives thereof. Picking up where the IPI Report series left off in 2000, “Brave News Worlds” explores what the next 10 years hold for the news and journalism industry and offers insight into how journalists and non-journalists alike can take advantage of changes in the media and technology to make the future of news a bright one.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted Siqnature Redacted
    The Print that Binds: Local Journalism, Civic Life and the Public Sphere by Sara Rafsky B.A. Spanish, Georgetown University, 2007 SUBMITTED TO THE PROGRAM IN COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES/WRITING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE 2018 @2018 Sara Rafsky. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature redacted Signature of Author: Department of Comparatib-tIedia Studies May 11, 2018 Certified by: Signature redacted William Uricchio Professor of Comparative Media Studies I I j Ttesis Supervisor Accepted by: Siqnature redacted Heather Hendershot Professor of Comparative Media Studies Director of Graduate Studies MAS ACHUSES INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MAY 3 0 2018 LIBRARIES ARCHIVES The Print that Binds: Local Journalism, Civic Life and the Public Sphere by Sara Rafsky Submitted to the Department of Comparative Media Studies/ Writing on May 11, 2018 in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies Abstract In the current political climate in the United States, much attention has been paid to the role of the press in our increasingly polarized society and to what extent it exacerbates or mends divisions. While the majority of that analysis is focused on national politics and news outlets, the role of local media and the crucial role it plays in civic life has been often neglected in the wider debate.
    [Show full text]
  • December-January 2014 Is Technology the Cause of Car Crashes
    START UP SUCCESS: TIPS FOR PERFECTING YOUR PITCH AND SELLING TO BIG BUSINESS DECEMBER/JANUARY 2014 IS TECHNOLOGY THE CAUSE OF CAR CRASHES? OR THE CURE? PLUS OVERCOMING RESISTANCE TO SELF-DRIVING CARS > TOP ICT TRENDS FOR 2014 > 3D PRINTING FOR BUSINESS INNOVATION > MOBILE: AN ERGONOMIC NIGHTMARE! CONTENTS Information Age December/January 2014 | 3 Gartner: the top 10 IT changing 16 predictions for 2014 What’s your The consultancy’s list of what will affect the ICT industry in the near future. new year’s 26 Five ways to prepare for wearable devices at work resolution? The technology industry has a new challenge after smartphones and tablets in the workplace: wearable computing. Get set for new tech 3D printing adds new dimension 36 to innovation Amid the consumer hype, companies are using the machines for product development. 29 Do’s and don’ts for tech start-ups When launching a new product, these common mistakes could cost start-ups valuable opportunities. 31 Perfect pitch How start-ups should sell to the enterprise. Information Age December/January 2014 | 4 CONTENTS 6 Focus on professionalism a feature for Tate As he comes to the end of his term as ACS president, 44 All in the mind Nick Tate reflects on some of the highlights of his time User-centric computing now requires more than in office. lip service. 19 Is technology the cause of car 46 There’s no vacation from fitness crashes or the cure? Going on holiday? That’s no excuse to stop working Are smartphones and other tech products unfairly out with apps and gear for exercising anywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Tablet Magazines and the Affects on the Magazine Industry
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@CalPoly Tablet Magazines and the Affects on the Magazine Industry By Kylee Staughton A Senior Project presented to the faculty of the Graphic Communication Department California Polytechnic State University March 2012 Abstract The purpose of this study is to determine the affects tablet magazines have on the magazine industry. It includes research on past and present circulation trends for print and digital magazine consumption. Interviews of industry professionals were conducted, giving their insight into the development and consumer attitudes toward iPad tablet magazines. An online survey questioning subscription, functionality and general views of both tablet and print magazines was distributed as well as an in person case study that allowed users to physically navigate, observe and compare an iPad magazine and its print counterpart. The results of this study can be used to predict the impact of a recent technological introduction—the iPad magazine and its affects on the current and future magazine industry. Table of Contents Chapter Page I. Introduction 1 II. Review of Literature 5 III. Methodology 11 IV. Development of Study 19 V. Conclusion 28 References 32 Chapter 1. Introduction The past few decades have been filled with revolutionizing technological advancements. Setting the stage in the 1960’s was the release of the Internet; eventually transforming how the world interacted and consumed information and entertainment. In April 2010, there was yet another revolutionizing invention; the touchscreen iPad developed by Apple Inc. Unlike its smartphone forerunners, the Apple iPhone and Google Android both of which integrate touchscreen interactivity; Apple’s iPad has a much larger touchscreen.
    [Show full text]
  • Attack of the Customers
    Sample Chapter Attack of the Customers Why Critics Assault Brands Online and How To Avoid Becoming a Victim By Paul Gillin with Greg Gianforte AttackOfTheCustomers.com Buy on Amazon: bit.ly/AOTCBook Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the authors have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no repre- sentations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or complete- ness of its contents and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situa- tion. Consult with a professional where appropriate. The authors shall not be liable for any loss of profit or any commercial damag- es, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential or other damages. Do not read while operating heavy machinery. May cause agitation. For questions about reprints, excerpts, republication or any other issues, send an e-mail to [email protected]. Copyright © 2012 Paul Gillin and Greg Gianforte All rights reserved. ISBN: 1479244554 ISBN-13: 978-1479244553 For Lillian and Blair Contents INTRODUCTION VII CHAPTER 1: WHEN CUSTOMERS ATTACK 1 Attacks come from nowhere and strike even the biggest brands. Poor customer service is often the cause. CHAPTER 2: HOW ATTACKS HAPPEN.......15 Analysis of three recent attacks shows the power of social media to both accelerate and distort their magnitude. CHAPTER 3: STUDIES IN SOCIAL MEDIA CRI- SIS.......27 Learn from the experience of seven attack victims. CHAPTER 4: WHY CUSTOMERS ATTACK.......46 The surprising truths about what foments customer dissatisfaction and why attackers can also be valuable allies.
    [Show full text]
  • What Would Google Do?
    What Would Google Do? Jeff Jarvis For Tammy, Jake, and Julia Contents WWGD? 1 Google Rules 9 New Relationship 11 • Give the people control and we will use it • Dell hell • Your worst customer is your best friend • Your best customer is your partner New Architecture 24 • The link changes everything • Do what you do best and link to the rest • Join a network • Be a platform • Th ink distributed New Publicness 40 • If you’re not searchable, you won’t be found • Everybody needs Googlejuice • Life is public, so is business • Your customers are your ad agency New Society 48 • E l e g a n t o r g a n i z a t i o n New Economy 54 • Small is the new big • The post-scarcity economy • Join the open- source, gift economy • The mass market is dead—long live the mass of niches iv Contents • Google commodifi es everything • Welcome to the Google economy New Business Reality 70 • Atoms are a drag • Middlemen are doomed • Free is a business model • Decide what business you’re in New Attitude 82 • There is an inverse relationship between control and trust • Trust the people • Listen New Ethic 91 • Make mistakes well • Life is a beta • Be honest • Be transparent • Collaborate • Don’t be evil New Speed 103 • Answers are instantaneous • Life is live • Mobs form in a fl ash New Imperatives 109 • Beware the cash cow in the coal mine • Encourage, enable, and protect innovation • Simplify, simplify • Get out of the way If Google Ruled the World 119 Media 123 • The Google Times: Newspapers, post-paper • Googlewood: Entertainment, opened up • GoogleCollins: Killing
    [Show full text]
  • ITAGENDA 2014 Priorities Include Datacenter Modernization and Support for Mobile, Cloud, Social and Big Data Initiatives, While Windows XP Migration Tops the List
    Foley: 5 Products Microsoft Could Deliver This Year January 2014 VOL.20 NO.1 REDMONDMAG.COM ITAGENDA 2014 Priorities include datacenter modernization and support for mobile, cloud, social and big data initiatives, while Windows XP migration tops the list. Next-Gen Virtualization › Extend your datacenter with SDN using the new Hyper-V in Windows Server 2012 R2 › A fi rst look at Microsoft System Center 2012 R2 Virtual Machine Manager › Some Microsoft Licensing Fees Could Rise This Year › Are You Failing Your IT Team? Go beyond one-dimensional performance monitoring. Visualize, analyze and optimize your entire virtual data center. Dell Foglight for Virtualization delivers heterogeneous operations performance management to help you increase VM density and lower operational expenditures. software.dell.com/FoglightforVirtualizationPerformance © 2013 Dell, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Dell, Dell Software, the Dell Software logo and products—as identified in this document—are registered trademarks of Dell, Inc. in the U.S.A. and/or other countries. All other trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners. PrintAd-PerfMon-VirtCIO2013-US-KS Untitled-3 1 10/21/13 3:21 PM Redmond The Independent Voice of the Microsoft IT CommunityContentsJANUARY 2014 COVER STORY REDMOND REPORT 4 Some Microsoft IT Agenda: Licensing Fees Could Rise This Year 2014 5 Microsoft Joins Tech Migrating to new platforms such as Firms Denouncing mobile devices, bolstering security Surveillance and new usage models such as social networking and analyzing 5 Windows Azure Active big data in real time, will drive this Directory Gains Group year’s IT initiatives. Management Page 10 " Microsoft has 12 New Era of Enterprise IT 17 Microsoft Steps announced two Analysts expect mobile, cloud, big up Windows Cadence data and social media to dominate the The new mobile-centric vision for Windows broad licensing technology agenda this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Search Box: the Political Economy of a Global Internet Industry
    BEHIND THE SEARCH BOX: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF A GLOBAL INTERNET INDUSTRY BY SHINJOUNG YEO DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Library and Information Science in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2015 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Dan Schiller, Chair Professor Linda Smith Professor Christian Sandvig, University of Michigan Professor Fred Turner, Stanford University Abstract With the rapid proliferation of the Web, the search engine constituted an increasingly vital tool in everyday life, and offered technical capabilities that might have lent themselves under different circumstances to a sweeping democratization of information provision and access. Instead the search function was transformed into the most profitable large-scale global information industry. This dissertation examines the evolution of search engine technologies within the context of the commercialization and commodification of the Internet. Grounded in critical political economy, the research details how capital has progressively shifted information search activities further into the market, transforming them into sites of profit-making and poles of capitalist growth. It applies historical and political economic analysis by resorting to an extensive array of sources including trade journals, government documents, industry reports, and financial and business newspapers. The first chapter situates the development of the search engine within the wider political economy of the Internet industry. The second shows how the technology of search was reorganized to enable profitable accumulation. The third and fourth chapters focus on another primary concern of political economy: the labor structures and labor processes that typify this emergent industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Sidewalk
    Security Now! Transcript of Episode #796 Page 1 of 27 Transcript of Episode #796 Amazon Sidewalk Description: At the beginning of this podcast, you're going to receive some details about another update to Chrome, and news of a few new high-profile ransomware victims. You'll learn about a breathtaking, remotely exploitable zero-click complete iPhone security compromise, as well as another significant big step forward for DNS privacy beyond DoH. We'll explain the nature of another serious and probably lingering problem within many Android apps. I have a few interesting bits of miscellany and SpinRite news to share. And before this is over, you will have obtained a full working sense for exactly what it is that Amazon has created and why, with their Amazon Sidewalk neighborhood IoT network concept, coming soon to all of your Amazon devices. High quality (64 kbps) mp3 audio file URL: http://media.GRC.com/sn/SN-796.mp3 Quarter size (16 kbps) mp3 audio file URL: http://media.GRC.com/sn/sn-796-lq.mp3 SHOW TEASE: It's time for Security Now!. Steve Gibson is here. Lots to talk about, including one of the most breathtaking iPhone hacks ever. Thank goodness it's been patched. We'll also take a look at a replacement for DoH known as ODoH. ODoH. And Steve's going to analyze the security and privacy model of Amazon's Sidewalk technology. Should you leave it on? Steve answers that question next on Security Now!. Leo Laporte: This is Security Now! with Steve Gibson, Episode 796, recorded Tuesday, December 8th, 2020: Amazon Sidewalk.
    [Show full text]