Establishment of Strawberry Guava Biocontrol in Hawaii M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Establishment of Strawberry Guava Biocontrol in Hawaii M Session 4 Abstracts Establishment of strawberry guava biocontrol in Hawaii M. Tracy Johnson* and Nancy L. Chaney USDA Forest Service, PO Box 236, Volcano, HI 96785, USA. [email protected] Strawberry guava, Psidium cattleianum (Myrtaceae), is a fast-growing Brazilian fruit tree that is a major threat to wet forests in Hawaii and other tropical islands. The biocontrol agent Tectococcus ovatus (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae), a leaf-galling scale insect from Brazil, was released and established in demonstration plots in Hawaii during 2012. The agent has begun to reproduce and spread within individual trees at these sites, although population growth is notably slower in Volcano (1200m elevation) compared to Hilo (150 m elevation). These initial release sites are within common gardens planted with three well-known genotypes of strawberry guava (red, yellow and spindle-fruited) to demonstrate impacts and specificity of the biocontrol agent. Results so far indicate that all three genotypes are susceptible to T. ovatus. Releases into forest sites were begun in 2013 at the request of land managers state-wide, who view biocontrol as an essential tool for slowing the spread of strawberry guava across hundreds of thousands of acres of native forest. Methods for establishing and dispersing the agent efficiently are under development. Our Hawaii program is designed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of this new biocontrol agent, to monitor its impacts in rainforest plots along invasion fronts, and to develop strategies for integrating biocontrol with restoration of already degraded forest areas state-wide. We also are beginning a project to monitor the potential for strawberry guava biocontrol to suppress a major agricultural pest, the fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), which develops in seasonally abundant P. cattleianum fruits and then invades dozens of fruit crops. Release and initial establishment of a seed-feeding weevil, Cissoanthonomus tuberculipennis, a biological control agent for balloon vine, Cardiospermum grandiflorum, in South Africa David O. Simelane*1, Khethani V. Mawela1 and Maria S. Ferrucci2 1Agricultural Research Council - Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X134, Queenswood 0121, South Africa. [email protected] 2Instituto de Botanica del Nordeste, IBONE, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias Universidad Nacional del Nordeste Sgto, Cabral 2131, C.C. 209 3400, Corrientes, Argentina. After 10 years of research, approval to release a seed-feeding weevil, Cissoanthonomus tuberculipennis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), against balloon vine, Cardiospermum grandiflorum (Sapindaceae), in South Africa was granted by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries in July 2013. Over 400 C. tuberculipennis, ranging from larval to adult stages, were collected from the native range in Corrientes province of Argentina in March 2013. Field release of the weevil commenced in August 2013 in South Africa, and since then over 450 C. tuberculipennis adults have been released at nine sites located in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), Limpopo and Gauteng provinces, with 50 adults released per site. Of these, initial establishment has been recorded at eight sites in KZN and Gauteng, with seed-predation ranging from 5-30% per site. Seed predation by C. tuberculipennis was also conducted in an open-field, in the native range, to determine the contribution of this weevil to seed destruction in relation to other seed feeders. Cissoanthonomus tuberculipennis alone destroyed up to 44% of seeds per site despite competitive interactions with other seed-attacking insects in the native range. Lack of seed-feeding competitors of C. tuberculipennis on C. grandiflorum in South Africa is likely to increase the reproductive output of this weevil and thereby increase levels of seed destruction. Progress on the biological control of two of Hawaii’s worst invasive alien species Djamila H. Djeddour*1, Robert A. Tanner1, Corin Pratt1 and Tracy Johnson2 1CABI Europe-UK, Bakeham Lane, Egham, Surrey, TW20 9TY, United Kingdom. [email protected] 2Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Quarantine Facility, Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry, USDA Forest Service, P.O. Box 236, Volcano, 96785 Hawaii, USA. The Himalayan yellow raspberry, Rubus ellipticus var. obcordatus (Rosaceae), and Kahili ginger, Hedychium gardnerianum (Zingiberaceae) are two of the most serious threats to the unique habitat of the Hawaiian Islands. Considered beyond chemical and mechanical control, these large, thicket-forming invasive plants are capable of altering ecosystem processes and displacing 93 Session 4 Abstracts natives across a range of habitats, including native montane rain forests. Both species are extraordinarily adaptable and aggressive vegetative-colonisers whose fruits are also readily dispersed by birds. Both are of Asian origin and are valued as ornamental plants in the Hawaiian community. Although mechanical and herbicidal control has been performed on a limited scale for both species, large-scale eradication is not feasible across such rugged terrain and the infested areas are increasing. Classical biological control is widely believed to be the only long-term solution to both these intractable invaders. A biocontrol initiative for Kahili ginger was initiated by CABI in 2008 for Hawaii and for New Zealand, whilst the Rubus biocontrol prospects for Hawaii are being rekindled focusing on natural enemies from the western Himalayas. This poster provides a review of the biological control efforts undertaken to date for Hawaii and elsewhere, as well as the potential of some of the arthropod and fungal agents that are under investigation. Biological control of the environmental weed Madeira vine in Australia W.A. Palmer*, E.L. Snow and K. Dhileepan Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Ecosciences Precinct, GPO Box 267, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia. [email protected] Australia commenced a small biocontrol project against the South American invasive, Madeira vine, Anredera cordifolia (Basellaceae), following the finding of two potential agents in Argentina by South African and local scientists. Two beetle species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) were then imported into quarantine in Queensland from laboratory cultures in South Africa: (i) Phenrica species did not prosper in Australia under quarantine conditions and the colony soon died out as did, ultimately, the South African culture, and later efforts to find new populations in Argentina were unsuccessful; (ii) in contrast, Plectonycha correntina (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) was very successfully cultured and considered highly promising. Host range studies on P. correntina indicated its safety for release in Australia and it has now been widely distributed in Queensland and northern New South Wales. Establishment has been partially successful, on occasion causing significant damage, but the ultimate effect of this agent is not yet known. New priorities, following a change in government in Australia, place less emphasis on environmental weeds such as Madeira vine and it is therefore unlikely that further effort will be made against A. cordifolia. Post release evaluation of Anthonomus santacruzi and Gargaphia decoris released against bugweed, Solanum mauritianum in the Lowveld of South Africa Archbold Sasa*, Marcus Byrne and Edward Witkowski School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa. [email protected] Bugweed, Solanum mauritianum (Solanaceae), is a South American invasive perennial weed of economic and ecological importance, mainly in the high rainfall regions of South Africa (Category 1 of the Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act). Chemical and mechanical control methods have not proved cost-effective in controlling this weed, hence biological control was introduced. Two biocontrol agents, Gargaphia decoris (Hemiptera: Tingidae) and Anthonomus santacruzi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) were released in South Africa in 1999 and 2008 respectively, with establishment reported in some regions. A post-release evaluation of these biocontrol agents to assess their impact on bugweed’s population growth and reproduction was carried out seasonally from December 2012 to November 2013. The study also looked at the effects of biotic and abiotic habitat characteristics on the growth and spread of the biocontrol agents on populations of bugweed. The approach to the study was observational field studies using 12 ‘riparian’ plots (six release, and six non-release) and 12 ‘plantation’ plots (six release, and six non-release) in the Lowveld (Sabie River catchment area of Mpumalanga Province, South Africa). In each plot (20 m x 50 m) five ‘permanent’ >2m tall plants were selected and used throughout the study. Insecticide exclusion, carbofuran at 10 g per plant once every season was used to exclude the biological control agents on the selected plants in the control (non-release) plots. 94 .
Recommended publications
  • Invasive Alien Species: the Application of Classical Biological Control for the Management of Established Invasive Alien Species Causing Environmental Impacts
    CBD Distr. GENERAL CBD/COP/14/INF/9 12 November 2018 ENGLISH ONLY CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Fourteenth meeting Item 26 of the provisional agenda* Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, 17-29 November 2018 INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES: THE APPLICATION OF CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ESTABLISHED INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES CAUSING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Note by the Executive Secretary BACKGROUND 1. The Executive Secretary is circulating herewith, for the information of participants in the fourteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties, a document on the application of classical biological control for the management of established invasive alien species causing environmental impacts. 2. The document is relevant to the work of the Convention on Biological Diversity, in particular with regard to addressing (a) tools for conducting analysis for the management of invasive alien species, (b) the risks associated with trade in live alien organisms, and (c) achieving Aichi Biodiversity Target 9. 3. The document is being circulated in the form and language in which it was received by the Secretariat. * CBD/COP/14/1. The application of classical biological control for the management of established invasive alien species causing environmental impacts Summary for Policy Makers Prepared by: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Species Survival Commission Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) *Note that the full report follows on from this Summary for Policy Makers document. Summary for policy makers Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) COP13 Decision XIII on Invasive Alien Species (IAS) recognized ‘that classical biological control can be an effective measure to manage already established invasive alien species’, and encouraged ‘Parties, other Governments and relevant organizations, when using classical biological control to manage already established invasive alien species, … [to take] into account the summary of technical considerations1’ that was annexed to the decision.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGY and HOST SPECIFICITY of Tectococcus
    BIOLOGY AND HOST SPECIFICITY OF Tectococcus ovatus (HEMIPTERA: ERIOCOCCIDAE), A POTENTIAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT OF THE INVASIVE STRAWBERRY GUAVA, Psidium cattleianum (MYRTACEAE), IN FLORIDA By FRANCIS JAMES WESSELS IV A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005 Copyright 2005 by Frank J. Wessels This document is dedicated to my parents, for their support and generosity throughout my educational career. Without them, this work would not have been possible. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my major professor Dr. James P. Cuda for his invaluable guidance and help throughout my degree program. I also thank my other committee members, Dr. Kenneth A. Langeland and Dr. William A. Overholt, for their comments and suggestions on my research and this manuscript. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... viii ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Page 2017 James P. Cuda, Ph.D. Professor and Fulbright
    IPM Award Nomination 1 James Cuda Cover Page 2017 James P. Cuda, Ph.D. Professor and Fulbright Scholar Charles Steinmetz Hall UF/IFAS Entomology & Nematology Dept. Bldg. 970, Natural Area Drive PO Box 110620 Gainesville, FL 32611-0620 (352) 273-3921 [email protected] IPM Award Nomination 2 James Cuda College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Steinmetz Hall, Bldg. 970 Entomology and Nematology Department 1881 Natural Area Drive P.O Box 110620 Gainesville, FL 32611-0620 352-273-3901 352-392-0190 Fax January 24, 2017 Southeastern Branch of the ESA Awards Committee Dear Committee: Although I have only recently joined the Entomology and Nematology Department at the University of Florida, I have quickly come to learn of Dr. Jim Cuda’s accomplishments and passion for research and education in in biocontrol and integrated pest management. As a consequence, I have decided to nominate him for the ESA SEB Recognition Award in IPM and believe he is deserving of your strongest consideration. Jim has developed an internationally recognized program in biocontrol of invasive weeds and has become a globally recognized authority in identifying and evaluating potential biocontrol agents of invasive weeds. He has made significant contributions to the successful management of important invasive weed species in both aquatic and terrestrial environments. He also has made important discoveries in understanding the attributes of successful introduction of exotic biocontrol agents in a manner that successfully mitigates the invasion without disruption of native species. Information from this work has been critical to the management of important invasive plant species such as the tropical soda apple.
    [Show full text]
  • Session 4: Target and Agent Selection
    Session 4: Target and Agent Selection Session 4 Target and Agent Selection 123 Biological Control of Senecio madagascariensis (fireweed) in Australia – a Long-Shot Target Driven by Community Support and Political Will A. Sheppard1, T. Olckers2, R. McFadyen3, L. Morin1, M. Ramadan4 and B. Sindel5 1CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia [email protected] [email protected] 2University of KwaZulu-Natal, Faculty of Science & Agriculture, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa [email protected] 3PO Box 88, Mt Ommaney Qld 4074, Australia [email protected] 4State of Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Plant Pest Control Branch, 1428 South King Street, Honolulu, HIUSA [email protected] 5School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351 Australia [email protected] Abstract Fireweed (Senecio madagascariensis Poir.) biological control has a chequered history in Australia with little to show after 20 plus years. Plagued by local impacts, sporadic funding, a poor understanding of its genetics and its origins, and several almost genetically compatible native species, the fireweed biological control program has been faced with numerous hurdles. Hope has risen again, however, in recent years through the staunch support of a very proactive team of local stakeholders and their good fortune of finding themselves in a key electorate. The Australian Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry has recently funded an extendable two year project for exploration in the undisputed native range of fireweed in South Africa and a detailed search for agents that are deemed to be both effective and unable to attack closely related Australian Senecio species.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of Strawberry Guava Biocontrol in Hawaii Release And
    Session 4 Abstracts Establishment of strawberry guava biocontrol in Hawaii M. Tracy Johnson* and Nancy L. Chaney USDA Forest Service, PO Box 236, Volcano, HI 96785, USA. [email protected] Strawberry guava, Psidium cattleianum (Myrtaceae), is a fast-growing Brazilian fruit tree that is a major threat to wet forests in Hawaii and other tropical islands. The biocontrol agent Tectococcus ovatus (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae), a leaf-galling scale insect from Brazil, was released and established in demonstration plots in Hawaii during 2012. The agent has begun to reproduce and spread within individual trees at these sites, although population growth is notably slower in Volcano (1200m elevation) compared to Hilo (150 m elevation). These initial release sites are within common gardens planted with three well-known genotypes of strawberry guava (red, yellow and spindle-fruited) to demonstrate impacts and specificity of the biocontrol agent. Results so far indicate that all three genotypes are susceptible to T. ovatus. Releases into forest sites were begun in 2013 at the request of land managers state-wide, who view biocontrol as an essential tool for slowing the spread of strawberry guava across hundreds of thousands of acres of native forest. Methods for establishing and dispersing the agent efficiently are under development. Our Hawaii program is designed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of this new biocontrol agent, to monitor its impacts in rainforest plots along invasion fronts, and to develop strategies for integrating biocontrol with restoration of already degraded forest areas state-wide. We also are beginning a project to monitor the potential for strawberry guava biocontrol to suppress a major agricultural pest, the fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), which develops in seasonally abundant P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Strawberry Guava in Hawaii
    CHAPTER 12 Managing conflict over biological control: the· case of strawberry guava in Hawaii M. Tracy Johnson USDA Forest Service, PacificSouthwest Research Station, Volcano, USA Introduction invaders with no viable management alternatives, it may be necessary to consider biological control even Conflict can be a part of virtually any decision about when it is likely to generate conflict. Discussed here is a management of natural resources, not least decisions case study, strawberry guava (Psidium cattleianum regarding use of biological control. The shared, public Sabine) in Hawaii, in which conflicting views of the character of natural resources and the permanent, targeted plant engendered substantial opposition to irrevocable nature of biological control releases ensure biological control. The processes followed and lessons that many people will have opinions, sometimes learned may be useful for others considering biological strongly held, regarding use of a particular biological control as a management option for widespread plant control agent in an area they care about. Conflicts asso­ invasions in natural areas, especially where there are ciated with the use of biological control have been groups with conflicting interests. reviewed elsewhere, along with approaches for resolving conflict and the challenges these present (Turner, 1985; Stanley and Fowler, 2004; Hayes et al., Strawberry guava in Hawaii 2008). A variety of conflict-resolution approaches exist; however, the time and effort involved in gathering the Following its introduction into Hawaii in the early necessary data and engaging in the required processes 1800s, strawberry guava (Figure 12.1) was cultivated to resolve conflicts tend to be seen as onerous, moti­ widely in gardens and used occasionally in efforts to vating weed biological control scientists to select only reforest degraded landscapes (Degener, 1939; Wagner targets with low potential for conflict (Stanley and et al., 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • New State Records and Additions to the Alien Terrestrial Arthropod Fauna in the Hawaiian Islands Janis N
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i1 at Manoa Proceedings of the hawaiian entomological society (2019) 51(1) 1–71 New State Records and Additions to the Alien Terrestrial Arthropod Fauna in the Hawaiian Islands Janis N. Matsunaga1, Francis G. Howarth2, and Bernarr R. Kumashiro1 1Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Plant Pest Control Branch, 1428 S. King St. Honolulu, Hawaii 96814. 2Distinguished Research Associate, Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii. Email: [email protected] Abstract. An annotated list of 393 adventive terrestrial arthropod species plus three new varieties of known established species, which have been recorded in Hawaii since the Fourth Edition of Bishop Museum’s Hawaiian Terrestrial Arthro- pod Checklist (Nishida 2002), is presented. This compilation includes records of over 362 nonnative arthropod species published between the years of 2001 and 2017 as well as over 30 new Hawaii State records that have not been previously recorded. Annotations include date first detected, island distribution, citation, relevant biological notes, and for new state and island records, the collection data. A separate table with about 150 entries lists the synonyms, misidentifications, dele- tions, and changes of status for species included in the 2002 checklist that were discovered during our research. However, the latter list is not comprehensive as a complete revision of the 2002 checklist was beyond the scope of our project. Also included is a bibliography of the approximately 270 source documents that were consulted. We intend for this publication to be a useful supplement to the 2002 edition of the Hawaiian Terrestrial Arthropod Checklist.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2019 Hawaiʻi Conservation Conference Abstract Book
    Abstract Book 41 Sampling, fast and slow: Examining tradeoffs in surveying low-density populations Jake Ferguson1, John Fieberg2 1University of Hawai`i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States, 2University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States There likely exists an empirical tradeoff between survey efficiency and survey coverage in most study designs. Surveys performed slowly are time-consuming and thus cover a limited area; however, they also have a higher probability of detecting individuals. On the other hand, when surveys are performed quickly, they cover more area at the expense of lower detection rates. Here we explored two types of surveys for the aquatic invasive species, zebra mussel. We applied two types of surveys. The first, transect surveys with distance sampling, covers a larger area but has imperfect detection. The second, quadrat surveys, represents a low-efficiency survey with high detection probability. We examined how each design performed under a range of densities of an invasive freshwater mussel. Finally, we used these empirical studies to explore a general model that allowed us to examine the determine the best survey approach for a given problem based on empirical tradeoffs in survey coverage and detection. 2 67 Native Hawaiian ecological knowledge (NHEK) as a culturally- and place-based learning platform in Hawaiʻi's education system: a case study on the 2018 Nā Hopena Aʻo (HĀ) Summit Leland Williams1 1Hawaiʻi Pacific University, Honolulu, United States The 2018 Nā Hopena Aʻo (HĀ) Summit held March 9th-10th at Windward Community College in Kaneʻohe on the island of Oʻahu allowed teachers, principals, administrators, and other educational staff throughout Hawaiʻi and elsewhere to come together for the second time to be introduced and trained in an educational framework that emphasizes the integration of Hawaiian culture and values throughout all forms of learning in Hawaiʻi's schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Crapemyrtle Bark Scale: a New Threat for Crapemyrtles, a Popular Landscape Plant in the U.S
    insects Review Crapemyrtle Bark Scale: A New Threat for Crapemyrtles, a Popular Landscape Plant in the U.S. Zinan Wang 1, Yan Chen 2, Mengmeng Gu 3, Erfan Vafaie 4, Michael Merchant 5 and Rodrigo Diaz 1,* 1 Department of Entomology, Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA; [email protected] 2 Hammond Research Station, Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University, Hammond, LA 70403, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Horticultural Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, College Station, TX 77843, USA; [email protected] 4 Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research & Extension Center, Overton, TX 75684, USA; [email protected] 5 Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research & Extension Center, Dallas, TX 75252, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-225-578-1835 Academic Editor: Mary L. Cornelius Received: 25 October 2016; Accepted: 9 December 2016; Published: 16 December 2016 Abstract: Crapemyrtle bark scale, Acanthococcus (=Eriococcus) lagerstroemiae (Kuwana) (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae), is a newly introduced insect pest on crapemyrtles, Lagerstroemia spp. (Myrtales: Lythraceae), one of the most popular flowering shrubs in the U.S. Since first detected in Texas in 2004, this pest has spread to twelve states causing losses to stakeholders. To develop a management plan, we reviewed current knowledge about the pest’s biology and ecology, and suggested research approaches including studying its thermal tolerance, host range, plant resistance and biological control. Parasitoids and predators have been reared from A. lagerstroemiae in the U.S. and China. However, new surveys of natural enemies should be conducted in China, and studies on the host range and impacts of natural enemies on A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Hawai'i Conservation Conference ABSTRACTS What
    2012 Hawai‘i Conservation Conference ABSTRACTS What Difference Does 20 Years Make? Reflections on Change, Innovation, and the Work that Remains July 31 – August 2, 2012 Hawai‘i Convention Center, Honolulu, HI Hawai‘i Conservation Alliance Hawai‘i Conservation Alliance Foundation TABLE OF CONTENTS Index of Oral Presentation Abstracts by Presenting Author .................................................... ii Oral Presentation Abstracts by Session Concurrent Session 1: July 31, 2012 .......................................................................................... 1 Concurrent Session 2: July 31, 2012 .......................................................................................... 8 Concurrent Session 3: August 1, 2012 ..................................................................................... 14 Concurrent Session 4: August 1, 2012 ..................................................................................... 27 Concurrent Session 5: August 1, 2012 ..................................................................................... 37 Concurrent Session 6: August 2, 2012 ..................................................................................... 47 Concurrent Session 7: August 2, 2012 ..................................................................................... 59 Index of Poster Presentation Abstracts by Presenting Author ............................................... 72 Poster Presentation Abstracts by Category Agriculture ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Suppressing Over-Abundant Invasive Plants and Insects in Natural Areas by Use of Their Specialized Natural Enemies Edited by Roy G
    United States Department of Agriculture SUPPRESSING OVER-ABUNDANT INVASIVE PLANTS AND INSECTS IN NATURAL AREAS BY USE OF THEIR SPECIALIZED NATURAL ENEMIES Edited by Roy G. Van Driesche and Richard C. Reardon Forest Health Technology FHTET-2017-02 Enterprise Team April 2017 The Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ Cover Photos: (a) Rainbow falls, Hawaii (Credit: Kyle Hawton); (b) healthy brood of a vegetarian ground finches,Platyspiza crassirostris (Credit: George Heimpel); (c) Philornis downsi, an invasive parasitic fly (Credit: David L. Hansen, University of Minnesota); (d) dead vegetarian ground finch chick killed by P. downsi (Credit: Jody O’Connor and Sonia c d Kleindorfer); (e) Conura annulifera, a parasitoid of P. downsi (Credit: David L. Hansen, University of Minnesota); (f) the melaleuca weevil, Oxyops vitiosa (Credit: Ellen C. Lake, b e USDA ARS); (g) O. vitiosa adult and feeding scars on melaleuca foliage (Credit: Willey Durden, USDA ARS, bugwood.org); (h) the melaleuca psyllid, Boreioglycaspis melaleucae f g (Credit: Paul D. Pratt, USDA ARS); (i) waxy flocculence produced by B. melaleucae nymphs on melaleuca foliage (Credit: Susan A. Wright, USDA ARS); (j) melaleuca h i j infestation (Credit: Randy Westbrooks, bugwood.org) For additional copies of this publication, contact: Richard Reardon FHTET, USDA Forest Service, 180 Canfield Street, Morgantown, WV 26505 304.285.1566; [email protected] This publication is available online at: https://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/pdfs/FHTET-2017-02_Biocontrol_Natural_Areas.pdf The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader.
    [Show full text]