DOCSLIB.ORG

657985.Pdf (2.373Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
657985.Pdf (2.373Mb) ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ ANABİLİM DALI EĞİTİMİN FELSEFİ, SOSYAL VE TARİHİ TEMELLERİ PROGRAMI DASKYLEİON (HİSARTEPE) SATRAPLIĞI’NDA EĞİTİM VE KÜLTÜR YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ OSMAN DENİZ DÖNER ANKARA OCAK, 2021 ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ ANABİLİM DALI EĞİTİMİN FELSEFİ, SOSYAL ve TARİHİ TEMELLERİ PROGRAMI DASKYLEİON (HİSARTEPE) SATRAPLIĞI’NDA EĞİTİM VE KÜLTÜR YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ OSMAN DENİZ DÖNER DANIŞMAN: PROF. DR. İSMAİL DOĞAN ANKARA OCAK, 2021 ÖZET DASKYLEİON (HİSARTEPE) SATRAPLIĞI’NDA EĞİTİM VE KÜLTÜR DÖNER, Osman Deniz Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı Tez Danışmanı: Prof. Dr. İsmail DOĞAN Ocak, 2021, xii + 69 Eski Çağ kültürleri, düşünürleri ve eğitim sistemleri, çağımızın kökleri hakkında bilgi sağlarken bu konudaki ilgiyi de canlı tutmaktadır. Bu bağlamda Anadolu’nun tarihsel ve toplumsal geçmişi de diğerleri kadar çok sorunu aydınlatmakta, bu çalışma da bu konuya ilişkin bir parça sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Kaynaklar tarafından bildirilen tarihsel olgular, olaylar ve diğer günümüze kadar ulaşan kalıntılar tarihsel ve toplumbilimsel karşılaştırmalı yöntemle yorumlanacaktır. Akhamenid idaresindeki Kuzeybatı Anadolu kendi uygarlıkları, Trakya ve Grek anakarası arasında kültürel etkileşimin olduğu bir bölge ve aynı zamanda da ayıran bir sınırdı. Bu çok kültürlü bağlamda ilerlemeci düşünceler olgulara yönelik olarak ortaya çıktı. Öğretme ve öğrenme de sorunsallaştırıldı ve konular değişiklik gösterdi. Bu değişimle birlikte Daskyleion Satraplığı’ndaki seçkinler ve diğerleri okullara daha fazla ilgi duymaya başladı. Anahtar Sözcükler: Kültür, eğitim, ilk çağ, uygarlık iv ABSTRACT EDUCATION AND CULTURE IN SATRAPY OF DASKYLEION (HISARTEPE) DONER, Osman Deniz Master Degree, Department of Educational Sciences Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ismail DOGAN January, 2021, xii + 69 Ancient cultures, scholars and education systems provides a knowledge and gives a perception for contemporary civilizations’ roots. In this regard historico – sociological past of Anatolia gives much perspective as others and this work intended to figure it out. Historical facts, events and other artificial informations provided by sources are subject of interpretation within a historico sociological comparison method. Troughout an Achaemenid administration in northwestern region of Anatolia kept its importance of being a cultural interaction zone and a border between Anatolian civilizations, Thracians and mainland Greeks. In this multicultural context much of progressive ideas occured through facts. Teaching and learning was also to considered as problematics and subjects were in changed as well. Within the shift elites or people in Daskyleion territory were gave much attention to schooling. Key Words: Culture, education, antiquity, civilization v ÖNSÖZ Bu tezin yazılmasında gereken desteği ve ilgiyi gösterdikleri için başta Eğitim Tarihinin Ana Evreleri dersi hocam ve tez danışmanım Prof. Dr. İsmail Doğan’a olmak üzere, Dr. Cengiz Aslan’a, çalışmanın konu aldığı bölgeyi fiziksel yönden görmemi sağlayan babam Mehmet Döner‘e ve bu süreç içerisinde beni yalnız bırakmayan annem Sevim Yılmaz’a teşekkürlerimi sunarım. vi İÇİNDEKİLER Sayfa ETİK İLKELERE UYGUNLUK BİLDİRİMİ ........................................................................ iii ÖZET ........................................................................................................................................ iv ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... v ÖNSÖZ ..................................................................................................................................... vi İÇİNDEKİLER ........................................................................................................................ vii TABLOLAR DİZİNİ ........................................................................................................................... x GÖRSELLER DİZİNİ ........................................................................................................................ xi KISALTMALAR ..................................................................................................................... xii BÖLÜM 1 ............................................................................................................................................. 1 GİRİŞ ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Problem .................................................................................................................................. 1 Amaç ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Önem ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Sınırlılıklar ............................................................................................................................. 6 Tanımlar ................................................................................................................................. 6 BÖLÜM 2 ............................................................................................................................................. 8 YÖNTEM .................................................................................................................................. 8 Olgular ve Kaynakları ........................................................................................................... 8 İlerlemeci Yaklaşım ............................................................................................................ 10 Araştırma Modeli ................................................................................................................. 10 Alanyazın taraması ........................................................................................................... 11 Evren ve Örneklem............................................................................................................... 13 Verilerin Toplanması............................................................................................................ 13 Verilerin Çözümlenmesi ...................................................................................................... 14 BÖLÜM 3 ................................................................................................................................ 15 BULGULAR VE YORUMLAR ...................................................................................................... 15 İ. Ö. IX. YY. a Kadar Genel Durum .................................................................................... 15 Dönemin Genel Karakteristiği (İ. Ö. IX. – VI. YY.) ........................................................... 15 Demir Çağında Anadolu’ya Göçler .................................................................................. 16 İ. Ö. VII. – VI. YY. da Yakın Doğu ve Anadolu’daki Siyasi Gelişmeler ........................ 18 Sakalar ve Akhamenid İmparatorluğu .............................................................................. 18 vii Lidya – Akhamenid (Pteria) Savaşı .................................................................................. 19 İ. Ö. VIII. – VI. YY. Arası Anadolu’da İdari Yapı .............................................................. 20 Kent Devletleri (Polis) ve Batı Anadolu’da Koloniler ..................................................... 20 Akhamenid Dönemi İdaresi’nin Ana Hatları ................................................................... 23 Akhamenidler’de Siyasal Anlayış ve İdari Yapı .............................................................. 24 Anadolu’da Akhamenid Satraplık Sistemi ....................................................................... 27 Tiranlıklar ......................................................................................................................... 28 Akhamenid Döneminde Batı Anadolu’daki Siyasi Olaylar ................................................. 29 İyonya’da İlk Hoşnutsuzluklar ......................................................................................... 29 Delos Birliği ve Peloponez Savaşları ............................................................................... 30 Satraplar Savaşı ................................................................................................................ 31 Helenistik Döneme Geçiş ................................................................................................. 31 Fiziki ve Beşeri Özellikler ................................................................................................... 32 Daskyleion Satraplığı’nın Coğrafi Sınırları ve Önemli Yerleşim Merkezleri ..................... 32 Önemli Kentler ve Yerleşim Yerleri ................................................................................ 33 Ekonomik Etkinlikler ve Yol Ağları ................................................................................ 34 Daskyleion’un Satrapları ..................................................................................................... 35 Nüfus ve Özellikleri ............................................................................................................. 35 Daskyleion Satraplığı’nın Uyrukları ...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Artaxerxes II
    Artaxerxes II John Shannahan BAncHist (Hons) (Macquarie University) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Ancient History, Macquarie University. May, 2015. ii Contents List of Illustrations v Abstract ix Declaration xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Conventions xv Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 THE EARLY REIGN OF ARTAXERXES II The Birth of Artaxerxes to Cyrus’ Challenge 15 The Revolt of Cyrus 41 Observations on the Egyptians at Cunaxa 53 Royal Tactics at Cunaxa 61 The Repercussions of the Revolt 78 CHAPTER 2 399-390: COMBATING THE GREEKS Responses to Thibron, Dercylidas, and Agesilaus 87 The Role of Athens and the Persian Fleet 116 Evagoras the Opportunist and Carian Commanders 135 Artaxerxes’ First Invasion of Egypt: 392/1-390/89? 144 CHAPTER 3 389-380: THE KING’S PEACE AND CYPRUS The King’s Peace (387/6): Purpose and Influence 161 The Chronology of the 380s 172 CHAPTER 4 NUMISMATIC EXPRESSIONS OF SOLIDARITY Coinage in the Reign of Artaxerxes 197 The Baal/Figure in the Winged Disc Staters of Tiribazus 202 Catalogue 203 Date 212 Interpretation 214 Significance 223 Numismatic Iconography and Egyptian Independence 225 Four Comments on Achaemenid Motifs in 227 Philistian Coins iii The Figure in the Winged Disc in Samaria 232 The Pertinence of the Political Situation 241 CHAPTER 5 379-370: EGYPT Planning for the Second Invasion of Egypt 245 Pharnabazus’ Invasion of Egypt and Aftermath 259 CHAPTER 6 THE END OF THE REIGN Destabilisation in the West 267 The Nature of the Evidence 267 Summary of Current Analyses 268 Reconciliation 269 Court Intrigue and the End of Artaxerxes’ Reign 295 Conclusion: Artaxerxes the Diplomat 301 Bibliography 309 Dies 333 Issus 333 Mallus 335 Soli 337 Tarsus 338 Unknown 339 Figures 341 iv List of Illustrations MAP Map 1 Map of the Persian Empire xviii-xix Brosius, The Persians, 54-55 DIES Issus O1 Künker 174 (2010) 403 333 O2 Lanz 125 (2005) 426 333 O3 CNG 200 (2008) 63 333 O4 Künker 143 (2008) 233 333 R1 Babelon, Traité 2, pl.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercenaries, Poleis, and Empires in the Fourth Century Bce
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts ALL THE KING’S GREEKS: MERCENARIES, POLEIS, AND EMPIRES IN THE FOURTH CENTURY BCE A Dissertation in History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies by Jeffrey Rop © 2013 Jeffrey Rop Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 ii The dissertation of Jeffrey Rop was reviewed and approved* by the following: Mark Munn Professor of Ancient Greek History and Greek Archaeology, Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Gary N. Knoppers Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies, Religious Studies, and Jewish Studies Garrett G. Fagan Professor of Ancient History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Kenneth Hirth Professor of Anthropology Carol Reardon George Winfree Professor of American History David Atwill Associate Professor of History and Asian Studies Graduate Program Director for the Department of History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines Greek mercenary service in the Near East from 401- 330 BCE. Traditionally, the employment of Greek soldiers by the Persian Achaemenid Empire and the Kingdom of Egypt during this period has been understood to indicate the military weakness of these polities and the superiority of Greek hoplites over their Near Eastern counterparts. I demonstrate that the purported superiority of Greek heavy infantry has been exaggerated by Greco-Roman authors. Furthermore, close examination of Greek mercenary service reveals that the recruitment of Greek soldiers was not the purpose of Achaemenid foreign policy in Greece and the Aegean, but was instead an indication of the political subordination of prominent Greek citizens and poleis, conducted through the social institution of xenia, to Persian satraps and kings.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Barsine, Daughter of Artabazus
    Alexander’s Lovers by Andrew Chugg 4. Barsine, Daughter of Artabazus Barsine was by birth a minor princess of the Achaemenid Empire of the Persians, for her father, Artabazus, was the son of a Great King’s daughter.197 It is known that his father was Pharnabazus, who had married Apame, the daughter of Artaxerxes II, some time between 392 - 387BC.198 Artabazus was a senior Persian Satrap and courtier and was latterly renowned for his loyalty first to Darius, then to Alexander. Perhaps this was the outcome of a bad experience of the consequences of disloyalty earlier in his long career. In 358BC Artaxerxes III Ochus had upon his accession ordered the western Satraps to disband their mercenary armies, but this edict had eventually edged Artabazus into an unsuccessful revolt. He spent some years in exile at Philip’s court during Alexander’s childhood, starting in about 352BC and extending until around 349BC,199 at which time he became reconciled with the Great King. It is likely that his daughter Barsine and the rest of his immediate family accompanied him in his exile, so it is feasible that Barsine knew Alexander when they were both still children. Plutarch relates that she had received a “Greek upbringing”, though in point of fact this education could just as well have been delivered in Artabazus’ Satrapy of Hellespontine Phrygia, where the population was predominantly ethnically Greek. As a young girl, Barsine appears to have married Mentor,200 a Greek mercenary general from Rhodes. Artabazus had previously married the sister of this Rhodian, so Barsine may have been Mentor’s niece.
    [Show full text]
  • Daskyleion'un Ye- Rinin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Yap~Lan Tart~~ Malarda 2 Propontis Bölge- Sinde Iki Ayr~~ Yer Önerilmekteydi
    DASKYLE~~ ON Prof. TOMRIS BAKIR Hasluck ile yüzy~l~m~z~n ba~~nda ba~layan Daskyleion'un ye- rinin belirlenmesi üzerine yap~lan tart~~ malarda 2 Propontis bölge- sinde iki ayr~~ yer önerilmekteydi. Bunlardan biri için Ryndakos'un (Nilüfer Çay) Marmara Denizine döküldü~ü noktada yer alan E~ke1 3, di~eri için ise Ku~gölünün güneydo~usunda, Ergili Köyünün bat~s~n- da yer alan Hisartepe dü~ünülüyordu. 1952 y~l~~ Nisan ay~nda Kurt Bittel, ad~~ geçen bu her iki yerde de ara~t~rmalar yapm~~~ ve görü~- lerini bir y~l sonra yay~nlanan makalesinde bildirmi~ti 4. Kurt Bit- tel, her iki yerin çevrelerinde ele geçen arkeolojik malzemeleri de de- ~erlendirmi~~ ve sonuçta, Hisartepe üzerinde Herodot'un bahsetti~i 5 ~ satrapl~k merkezinin yer almas~~ gerekti~ini vurgulam~~t~r. 1954 y - ~ l~nda ba~lay~p, birkaç y~l devam eden ve Ekrem Akurgal ba~kanl - ~~nda bir heyet taraf~ndan yürütülen bir inceleme kaz~s~~ da ° Hisar- tepe'de, Daskyleion'un yer ald~~~n~~ kesinle~tiren buluntular~~ vermi~- tir. Hisartepe'de gerçekle~tirilen bu ilk sondajlardan otuzdört y~l son- ra, 1988 y~l~nda burada yeniden kaz~lara ba~lam~~~ bulunmaktay~z 7 (Fig. 1). F. W. Hasluck, "Poemanenum" JHS XXVI, 1906, 23-31. Th. Wiegand, AM XXIX, 1904, 286 vd.; J. A. Munro, "Dascylium" JHS XXXII, 1912, 57-67. 3 J. A. R. Munro, a.g.e., 62 vd. 4 K. Bittel, "Zur Lage von Daskyleion" AA, 1953, 1-16. Herodot III 120, 126; VI 33. E. Akurgal, "Les Fouilles de Daskyleion" Anatolia I, 1956, 20-24, Lev.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of the Rise in Violence in the Eastern Campaigns of Alexander the Great
    “Just Rage”: Causes of the Rise in Violence in the Eastern Campaigns of Alexander the Great _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _____________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by Jenna Rice MAY 2014 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled “JUST RAGE”: CAUSES OF THE RISE IN VIOLENCE IN THE EASTERN CAMPAIGNS OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT presented by Jenna Rice, a candidate for the degree of master of history, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Ian Worthington Professor Lawrence Okamura Professor LeeAnn Whites Professor Michael Barnes τῷ πατρί, ὅς ἐμοί τ'ἐπίστευε καὶ ἐπεκέλευε ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my committee, Professors Worthington, Okamura, Whites, and Barnes, for the time they spent reading and considering my thesis during such a busy part of the semester. I received a number of thoughtful questions and suggestions of new methodologies which will prompt further research of my topic in the future. I am especially grateful to my advisor, Professor Worthington, for reading through and assessing many drafts of many chapters and for his willingness to discuss and debate the topic at length. I know that the advice I received throughout the editing process will serve me well in future research endeavors. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ iv INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 Chapter 1. THE GREEK RULES OF WAR ..............................................................................5 2. ALEXANDER IN PERSIA ...................................................................................22 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Companion Cavalry and the Macedonian Heavy Infantry
    THE ARMY OP ALEXANDER THE GREAT %/ ROBERT LOCK IT'-'-i""*'?.} Submitted to satisfy the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in the School of History in the University of Leeds. Supervisor: Professor E. Badian Date of Submission: Thursday 14 March 1974 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH X 5 Boston Spa, Wetherby </l *xj 1 West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ. * $ www.bl.uk BEST COPY AVAILABLE. TEXT IN ORIGINAL IS CLOSE TO THE EDGE OF THE PAGE ABSTRACT The army with which Alexander the Great conquered the Persian empire was "built around the Macedonian Companion cavalry and the Macedonian heavy infantry. The Macedonian nobility were traditionally fine horsemen, hut the infantry was poorly armed and badly organised until the reign of Alexander II in 369/8 B.C. This king formed a small royal standing army; it consisted of a cavalry force of Macedonian nobles, which he named the 'hetairoi' (or Companion]! cavalry, and an infantry body drawn from the commoners and trained to fight in phalangite formation: these he called the »pezetairoi» (or foot-companions). Philip II (359-336 B.C.) expanded the kingdom and greatly increased the manpower resources for war. Towards the end of his reign he started preparations for the invasion of the Persian empire and levied many more Macedonians than had hitherto been involved in the king's wars. In order to attach these men more closely to himself he extended the meaning of the terms »hetairol» and 'pezetairoi to refer to the whole bodies of Macedonian cavalry and heavy infantry which served under him on his campaigning.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTAXERXES III OCHUS and His Reign
    't\ Class __lil^^-^^ Book_ —A\^ Gopyrightl^"._- COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT. ARTAXERXES III OCHUS AND His Reign WITH SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF THE OLD TESTAMENT SOURCES BEARING UPON THE PERIOD ^, AN INAUGURAL DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OP BERN IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DOCTOR'S DEGREE BY NOAH CALVIN HIRSCHY OP BERNE, INDIANA ACCEPTED BY THE PHILOSOPHICAL FACULTY UPON THE PROPOSAL OF PROFESSOR DR. K. MARTI PROFESSOR DR. G. TOBLER BERN DEAN JULY 16. 1907 CHICAGO THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS 1909 Copyright igog By The University of Chicago Published May igog Composed and Printed By The University of Chicago Press Chicago, Illinois, U. S. A. LIBRARY Of CONGRESS! Two Copies Received I my ! 9 1809 ( iC'-OiiS lA ^AC. ,'.0. PREFACE In this attempt to gather all the historic data of a dark and weary period of the world's history on which the sources of information are rather indefinite and unsatisfactory, it may at first appear that too much attention is paid to the general historic situation. But when we remember that some of the biblical sources claimed for the reign of Ochus are placed by scholars at different periods from the eighth to the first century, then this objection loses its force. The final solution of the acceptance or rejection of the Old Testament sources for this period seems to the writer to depend very largely on the clearness of our conception of the history of the last seven centuries before the Christian era. The reign of Ochus forms only a fragment of the two and a fourth centuries of Persian suprem- acy.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Memory in and After the Persian Empire Persian the After and Memory in Political
    POLITICAL IN MEMORY AND AFTER THE PERSIAN EMPIRE At its height, the Persian Empire stretched from India to Libya, uniting the entire Near East under the rule of a single Great King for the rst time in history. Many groups in the area had long-lived traditions of indigenous kingship, but these were either abolished or adapted to t the new frame of universal Persian rule. is book explores the ways in which people from Rome, Egypt, Babylonia, Israel, and Iran interacted with kingship in the Persian Empire and how they remembered and reshaped their own indigenous traditions in response to these experiences. e contributors are Björn Anderson, Seth A. Bledsoe, Henry P. Colburn, Geert POLITICAL MEMORY De Breucker, Benedikt Eckhardt, Kiyan Foroutan, Lisbeth S. Fried, Olaf E. Kaper, Alesandr V. Makhlaiuk, Christine Mitchell, John P. Nielsen, Eduard Rung, Jason M. Silverman, Květa Smoláriková, R. J. van der Spek, Caroline Waerzeggers, IN AND AFTER THE Melanie Wasmuth, and Ian Douglas Wilson. JASON M. SILVERMAN is a postdoctoral researcher in the Faculty of eology PERSIAN EMPIRE at the University of Helsinki. He is the author of Persepolis and Jerusalem: Iranian In uence on the Apocalyptic Hermeneutic (T&T Clark) and the editor of Opening Heaven’s Floodgates: e Genesis Flood Narrative, Its Context and Reception (Gorgias). CAROLINE WAERZEGGERS is Associate Professor of Assyriology at Leiden University. She is the author of Marduk-rēmanni: Local Networks and Imperial Politics in Achaemenid Babylonia (Peeters) and e Ezida Temple of Borsippa: Priesthood, Cult, Archives (Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten). Ancient Near East Monographs Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente Society of Biblical Literature Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente (UCA) Edited by Waerzeggers Electronic open access edition (ISBN 978-0-88414-089-4) available at Silverman Jason M.
    [Show full text]
  • Anadolu'da Pers Satraplık Sistemi the System of Persıan
    cedrus.akdeniz.edu.tr CEDRUS Cedrus IV (2016) 75-90 The Journal of MCRI DOI: 10.13113/CEDRUS/201606 ANADOLU’DA PERS SATRAPLIK SİSTEMİ THE SYSTEM OF PERSIAN SATRAPIES IN ANATOLIA ∗ SEVGİ SARIKAYA Öz: Bu makalede, Akhaimenid İmparatorluğu’nun yö- Abstract: The aim of this paper is to analyze the system netim sisteminde Anadolu’daki satraplık teşkilatının a- of Persian satrapies in Anatolia. There are various nalizinin yapılması amaçlanmaktadır. Satraplıklarda böl- administrative changes, consequences of the regional gesel ve kültürel farklılıklardan kaynaklanan çeşitli yö- and cultural differences of each satrapy. However, in the netimsel değişiklikler söz konusudur. Ne var ki, epigrafik ancient sources and from the epigraphic documenta- belgeler ve antik kaynaklarda her eyalet için idari biçim- tion there is insufficient information concerning this leri belirleyecek yeterli bilgi bulunmamaktadır. Bu ne- subject. For this reason, adding this data to the public denle var olan eksik verilere her satraplık merkezinde administrative structure which must be included in the olması gereken ortak idari yapılar da eklenerek en azın- center of each satrapy, this paper aims to identify the dan bütün satraplıklar için geçerli hizmetli kadrosu tespit complement of common officials for all satrapies. In edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu bağlamda makalede, eyaletlere this context, this work has focused on the satrap assign- satrap atama kriterleri; satrapların altındaki memur ment criteria; the staff under the satraps; sub-satrapies kadrosu; alt satraplık bölgeleri ve yönetim birimlerine and the local government/management units. The ilişkin bilgiler sunulmuştur. Çalışma, kullanılan verilerin study ends with a general evaluation and compilation of derlendiği genel bir değerlendirmeyle sonlandırılmıştır. the data employed.
    [Show full text]
  • Περίληψη : Pharnabazus II (C
    IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Παλαιοθόδωρος Δημήτρης Μετάφραση : Κούτρας Νικόλαος Για παραπομπή : Παλαιοθόδωρος Δημήτρης , "Pharnabazus", Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Μ. Ασία URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=9946> Περίληψη : Pharnabazus II (c. 450‑373 BC), was satrap of Hellespontine Phrygia and one of the protagonists in the Greco‑Persian wars fought for the control of Asia Minor. He fought against the Athenians (411‑407 BC) during the Ionian War and against the Spartans under Dercylidas and Agesilaus (399‑393 BC). He defeated the Spartans in the sea battle at Cnidus (394 BC) and paved the way for Persian ascendancy in Asia Minor. He later led two abortive campaigns in Egypt. Τόπος και Χρόνος Γέννησης Between 450 and 445 BC Τόπος και Χρόνος Θανάτου c. 373 BC Κύρια Ιδιότητα Satrap of Hellespontine Phrygia 1. Family Pharnabazus was an official of royal descent in the Achaemenid Empire.1His birth is dated to before 444 BC.2 Between 414 and 412 BC he inherited the office of satrap of Hellespontine Phrygia from his father Pharnaces II.3 He had a legitimate brother, whose name is unattested,4 while another, illegitimate, brother and his uncle, Susamithras, are also mentioned.5 He was married to Apame (387 BC),6 daughter of king Artaxerxes II (404-351 BC) and had three sons: Artabazus III,7 later satrap of Phrygia (362-330 BC), Oxythres and Dibictus.8 His heir, Ariobarzanes (387-362 BC) belonged to the same family; it is unclear, however, whether he was his legitimate brother or an older legitimate son from an unknown spouse.9 He also had an illegitimate son by one Parapita.10 His family controlled estates around Dascylium, where he had his palace on a naturally fortified position, surrounded by hamlets and paradises.
    [Show full text]
  • Dascylium: an Overview of the Achaemenid Satrapal City
    The Kyoto Journal of AncientDascylium: History ,An Vol. Overview12（2012） of the Achaemenid Satrapal City 1 《Article》 Dascylium: An Overview of the Achaemenid Satrapal City Takuji ABE 【Summary】 Dascylium was an Achaemenid administrative centre, and a satrapal seat of north-western Anatolia. This paper investigates this satrapal capital’s status, particularly its cultural association with the Persian heartland, and in addition serves to compare Dascylium to similar studies of Lydia, and its capital of Sardis. Archaeological evidence reveals that Dascylium’s governors did not inherit monumental structures which they could adopt for their use as public buildings, despite the fact that history of the city dates back to the pre-Persian period. Instead, a new landscape evolved that we assume is the ideal satrapal centre, which can now be studied as a result of the excavations at Dascylium. Among them is included the most intriguing find; an assemblage of bullae – clay lumps bearing seal impressions – recovered from the site of the acropolis. A great number of king’s legends shown on the bullae likely point to an intimate relationship between Persian sovereigns and subjects in the capital of their westernmost satrapy. The motifs of impressions also help reconstruct our image of cultural life as it was experienced by the Persian immigrants; for instance, the worship of Ahura Mazda, and hunting in paradeisoi. The reflections gleaned from these materials seem to represent those aspects of life colonists enjoyed at the empire’s centre and thus brought with them to their new homeland. Some evidence also suggests the persistence of local cultures, but in a much reduced form compared to what is seen in Lydian or Sardian studies.
    [Show full text]