Towards Estimating the Indigenous Population in Circumpolar Regions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Southern Denmark Towards estimating the indigenous population in circumpolar regions Young, T Kue; Bjerregaard, Peter Published in: International Journal of Circumpolar Health DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2019.1653749 Publication date: 2019 Document version: Final published version Document license: CC BY-NC Citation for pulished version (APA): Young, T. K., & Bjerregaard, P. (2019). Towards estimating the indigenous population in circumpolar regions. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 78(1), [1653749]. https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2019.1653749 Go to publication entry in University of Southern Denmark's Research Portal Terms of use This work is brought to you by the University of Southern Denmark. Unless otherwise specified it has been shared according to the terms for self-archiving. If no other license is stated, these terms apply: • You may download this work for personal use only. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying this open access version If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details and we will investigate your claim. Please direct all enquiries to [email protected] Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 International Journal of Circumpolar Health ISSN: (Print) 2242-3982 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/zich20 Towards estimating the indigenous population in circumpolar regions T. Kue Young & Peter Bjerregaard To cite this article: T. Kue Young & Peter Bjerregaard (2019) Towards estimating the indigenous population in circumpolar regions, International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 78:1, 1653749, DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2019.1653749 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2019.1653749 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 22 Aug 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 241 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=zich20 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIRCUMPOLAR HEALTH 2019, VOL. 78, 1653749 https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2019.1653749 Towards estimating the indigenous population in circumpolar regions T. Kue Younga and Peter Bjerregaardb aSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; bDepartment of Health, Centre for Public Health Research in Greenland, Greenland Government and University of Greenland, Copenhagen, Denmark, Nuuk, Greenland ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Despite the importance of indigenous people in the Arctic, there is no accurate estimate of their Received 28 June 2019 size and distribution. We defined indigenous people as those groups represented by the “per- Revised 20 August 2018 manent participants” of the Arctic Council. The census in Canada, Russia and the United States Accepted 1 August 2019 records status as an indigenous person. In Greenland, a proxy measure is place of birth supple- KEYWORDS mented by other information. For the Nordic countries we utilized a variety of sources including Circumpolar health; arctic; registered voters’ lists of the various Sami parliaments and research studies that established Sami indigenous people; cohorts. Overall, we estimated that there were about 1.13 million indigenous people in the population; census; registry northern regions of the 8 Member States of the Arctic Council. There were 8,100 Aleuts in Alaska and the Russian North; 32,400 Athabaskans in Alaska and northern Canada; 145,900 Inuit in Alaska, northern Canada and Greenland; 76,300 Sami in northern Norway, Sweden, Finland and Russia; and 866,400 people in northern Russia belonging to other indigenous groups. Different degrees and types of methodological problems are associated with estimates from different regions. Our study highlights the complexity and difficulty of the task and the consider- able gaps in knowledge. We hope to spur discussion of this important issue which could ultimately affect strategies to improve the health of circumpolar peoples. Introduction while in others it is recorded but with varying degree of completeness and accuracy. An important demographic characteristic of the This paper attempts to assemble available statistics Arctic is the presence of indigenous peoples, who from diverse sources to estimate the size of the indigen- constitute the majority of the population in some ous population in the 8 Arctic States and their northern regions. The importance of indigenous people in regions. We present regional estimates of the total indi- circumpolar issues is recognised by the fact that genous population as well as the population of specific the Arctic Council, the intergovernmental forum of indigenous groups across the Arctic. We do not present the 8 Arctic States – Canada, Kingdom of Denmark, data on the health status of Arctic indigenous peoples, as Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russian Federation, these are extensively documented elsewhere [2,3]. Sweden, and USA – includes also “permanent parti- Wedonotattempttodefine“indigenous people” in this cipants”. Permanent participants are international paper. While various definitions exist, including some from organisations of indigenous peoples whose home- international organisations, there are vastly different landscrossnationalbordersaswellasthenational national contexts, legislations and practices that defy organisation in Russia. These are the Aleut a comprehensive, universal definition. The diverse perspec- International Association [AIA], Arctic Athabaskan tives and many challenges in identifying indigenous peo- Council [AAC], Gwich’in International Council [GIC], ples globally were reviewed by Bartlett et al.[4]. As an Inuit Circumpolar Council [ICC], Russian Association operational definition, we include in this paper only those of Indigenous People of the North [RAIPON], and groups that are represented by one of the permanent Saami Council[1]. participants of the Arctic Council. AIA is an organisation of Despite the importance of the indigenous popula- Aleuts in the USA and Russia. AAC and GIC represent tion in the Arctic, an accurate estimate of its size and Athabaskan and Gwich’in communities in Alaska and north- distribution remains elusive. In some countries, ethnic ern Canada. While the Gwich’in language is a member of identity is not recorded by national statistical systems, the Athabaskan (also spelt Athabascan, Athapaskan) CONTACT T. Kue Young [email protected]; [email protected] School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article. © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 2 T. K. YOUNG AND P. BJERREGAARD language family, Gwich’in communities formed a separate political organisation. ICC has member organisations in Alaska, Canada, Greenland and Russia. We follow the ICC usage of “Inuit” to refer to Inuit collectively across all four countries, recognising that there are different regional xxx x xx terms for self-designation. The Saami Council represents the Sami in Norway, Sweden, Finland and Russia. Table 1 cross-tabulates the various indigenous groups and circumpolar regions covered in this paper. We use “ethnicity” to refer to different cultural groups of people, as the term is used in Canada and the Nordic countries. In the USA, the term “race” is used, while the term “ethnicity” is used by the Census Bureau to refer to Hispanic or Latino identity only. In Russia, the equivalent would be “nationality” [natsional’- nost’]. We also use the term “indigenous” across all the circumpolar regions, recognising that there are other terms such as “Aboriginal”, “Native”, etc., that are also in Norway Sweden Finland Russian Federation use in some regions. xxxxxx x x xxxxxx x x In presenting our data, we proceed eastward from the International Date Line, starting in Alaska, followed by northern Canada, the North Atlantic, Fennoscandia, and across Russia to Chukotka, its easternmost region directly across from Alaska. x x Methods, definitions and data sources Where available, data on indigenous populations were obtained from various national statistical agencies. Additional sources included the published literature Kingdom of Denmark and relevant websites of indigenous peoples’ organisa- tions. For each of the Arctic States, we identified various administrative regions as constituting their “North”, x with the exception of Iceland, which was treated as both a sovereign nation-state and a northern region. Greenland and Faroe Islands, self-governing territories of the Kingdom of Denmark, were regarded as its north- Canada ern regions. As indicated in Table 1, indigenous people x x x x as defined in this paper were not present in either Iceland or the Faroe Islands. USA and Alaska The State of Alaska is the only Arctic region of the USA. USA xx x x x x x x x x x x x The US Census Bureau publishes data on “American x x Indians and Alaska Natives” [AIAN] collectively,