DOCSLIB.ORG

The Pros and Cons of Learning Assessments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Pros and Cons of Learning Assessments The pros and cons of learning assessments Debate Learning assessments are considered essential for measuring and improving the quality of an education system; yet for some they also raise serious concerns. The controversy over Hong Kong SAR’s Territory Wide System Assessment illustrates the issues at stake. It has become widely accepted that students’ learning must be assessed in order for education systems to evaluate and improve on their own quality over time. Around the world, the majority of countries apply one or more forms of assessments and examinations at different educational stages (see the UNESCO Institute of Statistics catalogue of assessments). Regional and international assessment programmes and tools have proliferated, and data on international indicators is already being collected to measure progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals on indicators such as proficiency in reading, mathematics, and basic ICT skills. Yet there has also been marked resistance from some education stakeholders to the rising use of learning assessments. Opponents argue that over-reliance on learning assessments leads to a narrowing of the educational experience, places undue pressure on students and weakens their intrinsic love for learning, and—despite advancements in measurement—can ultimately provide only a very limited picture of many important aspects of a quality education. It has often been argued that low-stakes assessments can overcome many of these concerns by simply offering a snapshot of quality among a sample of students, without tying reward or punishment directly to the results. However, in many contexts even low-stakes assessments have been the subject of intense public debate. One case in point is the controversy over the Territory-wide System Assessment (TSA) in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. “TSA has dominated learning and teaching as well as the test and examination modes in schools, thus causing a metamorphosis of education.” Dr. Honourable Kenneth Chan Ka-lok, Member of the Hong Kong SAR Legislative Council "The TSA is the only assessment at primary levels that can provide objective, comprehensive and quality territory-wide data on basic competencies.” Mr. Eddie Ng Hak-kim, Hong Kong SAR Secretary for Education 1 / 5 Following are excerpts from discussions in Hong Kong SAR’s Legislative Council, illustrating the public controversy over the Territory-wide System Assessment. Dr. Kenneth Chan: Constituents’ concerns over the Territory-wide System Assessment “Currently, students of Primary 3 and 6 as well as Secondary 3 are all required to take part in the Territory-wide System Assessment (TSA) administered by the Education Bureau. The purpose of TSA is to gauge students' attainment of basic competencies in the three subjects of Chinese Language, English Language and Mathematics at various stages, with a view to improving learning and teaching. However, some education concern groups and parents have earlier remarked that some schools drill their students in the hope that they will get good scores in TSA, and this practice has exerted great pressure on teachers, students and parents. Also, TSA has dominated learning and teaching as well as the test and examination modes in schools, thus causing a metamorphosis of education. Hence, they request the Education Bureau to abolish TSA. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council […] whether it will conduct a comprehensive consultation with teachers, parents, students and the public to gauge their views on TSA's operations and future direction, and decide, in the light of the consultation outcome, if TSA should be abolished or maintained; if it will, of the details of such a consultation exercise; if not, the reasons for that?” [1] Mr. Eddie Ng Hak-kim, Secretary of Education: In defence of the TSA “[T]he territory-wide assessment data help the Government review policies and provide focused support to schools, [and] individual schools can make use of the school-level report to devise plans for enhancing learning and teaching. TSA is a low-stakes assessment that does not assess and report performance of individual students. Neither does it affect advancement in education nor allocation of school places for admission to Secondary 1. The data is not used for ranking or classifying schools. It is also not an index for imposing measures on schools to cease operation. The "five nots" are very clear. […] Since the implementation of the TSA at P3 in 2004, the Education Bureau (EDB) and the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (HKEAA) have been continuously attending to and collecting views and suggestions from various stakeholders on the TSA, including their concerns of workload for teachers and impact on schools and students. […] On the whole, stakeholders recognised the significance of the TSA assessment data for learning and teaching. However, we are aware of the concerns expressed recently by education groups and parents about drilling for TSA in schools. Due to the different situations of individual schools, some schools might misconceive that assigning a huge quantity of homework, supplementary exercises and practice drills could consolidate learning of content knowledge, which leads to the impression that the drilling culture in individual schools is attributable to TSA. However, they are two different issues. The EDB has updated and issued circulars and guidelines on homework and tests on October 31, 2015. It is clearly stated in the circular that with the incorporation of the curriculum targets into daily learning activities, the effective use of different student learning evidence collected (including that not from test or examination), as well as the application of appropriate tools for monitoring, recording and reporting performance and learning progression of students, teachers can devise teaching plans for the next stage of learning without the need to change the teaching and learning as well as 2 / 5 assessment approaches for the purpose of TSA. Schools are also reminded in the circular to formulate an appropriate school-based homework and assessment policy. […] The TSA is the only assessment at primary levels that can provide objective, comprehensive and quality territory-wide data on BCs [basic competencies]. It is irreplaceable by internal tests or examinations in schools. Thus, the decision to abolish the assessment should not be taken lightly. Besides, the TSA is not an assessment administered on a frequent basis. They are conducted at the end of the key learning stages of P3, P6 and S3. In other words, primary students will take part in TSA only once or twice. In fact, both local and international research evidence indicates that students' learning gap normally starts to widen at P3 or P4 levels. In this connection, the TSA data, which helps teachers understand the attainment level of BCs of P3 students, can be used together with other internal assessment data by teachers to identify learning difficulties and make necessary improvement in learning and teaching at an early stage. Otherwise, the gap between the high and low achieving students will be widened as they progress towards P6 level. Assessments of similar nature for students are conducted in a number of countries such as Australia and Canada, and even in some developing countries. We firmly believe in the need to help students build a good foundation and provide early support. Abolishing the TSA at P3 would represent a regression in this respect.”[2] Dr. Kenneth Chan: Arguing for the Primary 3 TSA to be abolished “[W]hile the abolition of the Primary 3 Territory-wide System Assessment (TSA) is being debated in this Council, the online group in support of such an abolition has already received responses from more than 76 000 members of the public. […] Regarding the Secretary's comment that the Bureau has already issued guidelines to remind schools of "No Drilling", I think it is simply nonsense. Even Government Primary School students are required to undergo drills for the TSA, too. What effort has the Secretary made? Will schools and other people heed his advice of "No Drilling"? Since everyone is drilling, children are compelled to bear the heavy pressure. Actually, students begin to face this problem since Primary 1. [… S]chools will still label themselves, whereas sponsoring bodies will still label themselves or make comparisons. School principals, parents and teachers will feel very frightened at seeing the TSA scores. As a result, they will be compelled to boost students' performance. […] In a public opinion survey conducted by the Civic Party, 70% of the respondents said over the telephone that the TSA had brought heavy pressure to bear on parents, teachers, schools and students. Likewise, 70% of the respondents supported the abolition of the Primary 3 TSA to give primary schools more room for teaching and learning, with a view to allowing teachers, parents, students and schools to do their part rather than concentrating on TSA drills for the sake of achieving targets ? it is found that targets really exist ? or else they will be informed that they have failed to achieve the targets. […] The Civic Party is now making a clear call for the abolition of the Primary 3 TSA. If the Secretary considers it to be an issue of immense significance, he may consider suspending the Primary 3 TSA first. He has once brought the Secondary 6 TSA to a halt and then implemented it on a biannual basis for reconsideration later because of the complaints lodged by Primary 6 students of excessive pressure and the need to attend to too many things concurrently. Now, I am telling the Secretary that the pressure borne by Primary 3 students is too heavy, and so the Primary 3 TSA should also be suspended. 3 / 5 […] Even if there is no TSA, primary schools still have internal and external assessment systems; even if there is no TSA, primary schools still have regular tests and examinations and still can do a proper job of teaching and learning.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hong Kong Official Title: Hong Kong Special Administration Region General Information
    Hong Kong Official Title: Hong Kong Special Administration Region General Information: Capital Population (million) 7.474n/a Total Area 1,104 km² Currency 1 CAN$=5.791 Hong Kong $ (HKD) (2020 - Annual average) National Holiday Establishment Day, 1 July 1997 Language(s) Cantonese, English, increasing use of Mandarin Political Information: Type of State Type of Government Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Bilateral Product trade Canada - Hong Kong 5000 4500 4000 Balance 3500 3000 Can. Head of State Head of Government Exports 2500 President Chief Executive 2000 Can. Imports XI Jinping Carrie Lam Millions 1500 Total 1000 Trade 500 Ministers: Chief Secretary for Admin.: Matthew Cheung 0 Secretary for Finance: Paul CHAN 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Statistics Canada Secretary for Justice: Teresa CHENG Main Political Parties Canadian Imports Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB), Democratic Party from: Hong Kong (DP), Liberal Party (LP), Civic Party, League of Social Democrats (LSD), Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People’s Livelihood (HKADPL), Hong Kong Federation of Precio us M etals/ stones Trade Unions (HKFTU), Business and Professionals Alliance for Hong Kong (BPA), Labour M ach. M ech. Elec. Party, People Power, New People’s Party, The Professional Commons, Neighbourhood and Prod. Worker’s Service Centre, Neo Democrats, New Century Forum (NCF), The Federation of Textiles Prod. Hong Kong and Kowloon Labour Unions, Civic Passion, Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, HK First, New Territories Heung Yee Kuk, Federation of Public Housing Estates, Specialized Inst. Concern Group for Tseung Kwan O People's Livelihood, Democratic Alliance, Kowloon East Food Prod.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basic Law and Democratization in Hong Kong, 3 Loy
    Loyola University Chicago International Law Review Volume 3 Article 5 Issue 2 Spring/Summer 2006 2006 The aB sic Law and Democratization in Hong Kong Michael C. Davis Chinese University of Hong Kong Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/lucilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael C. Davis The Basic Law and Democratization in Hong Kong, 3 Loy. U. Chi. Int'l L. Rev. 165 (2006). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/lucilr/vol3/iss2/5 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago International Law Review by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BASIC LAW AND DEMOCRATIZATION IN HONG KONG Michael C. Davist I. Introduction Hong Kong's status as a Special Administrative Region of China has placed it on the foreign policy radar of most countries having relations with China and interests in Asia. This interest in Hong Kong has encouraged considerable inter- est in Hong Kong's founding documents and their interpretation. Hong Kong's constitution, the Hong Kong Basic Law ("Basic Law"), has sparked a number of debates over democratization and its pace. It is generally understood that greater democratization will mean greater autonomy and vice versa, less democracy means more control by Beijing. For this reason there is considerable interest in the politics of interpreting Hong Kong's Basic Law across the political spectrum in Hong Kong, in Beijing and in many foreign capitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Party (Cp)
    立法會 CB(2)1335/17-18(04)號文件 LC Paper No. CB(2)1335/17-18(04) CIVIC PARTY (CP) Submission to the United Nations UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) CHINA 31st session of the UPR Working Group of the Human Rights Council November 2018 Introduction 1. We are making a stakeholder’s submission in our capacity as a political party of the pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong for the 2018 Universal Periodic Review on the People's Republic of China (PRC), and in particular, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). Currently, our party has five members elected to the Hong Kong Legislative Council, the unicameral legislature of HKSAR. 2. In the Universal Periodic Reviews of PRC in 2009 and 2013, not much attention was paid to the human rights, political, and social developments in the HKSAR, whilst some positive comments were reported on the HKSAR situation. i We wish to highlight that there have been substantial changes to the actual implementation of human rights in Hong Kong since the last reviews, which should be pinpointed for assessment in this Universal Periodic Review. In particular, as a pro-democracy political party with members in public office at the Legislative Council (LegCo), we wish to draw the Council’s attention to issues related to the political structure, election methods and operations, and the exercise of freedom and rights within and outside the Legislative Council in HKSAR. Most notably, recent incidents demonstrate that the PRC and HKSAR authorities have not addressed recommendations made by the Human Rights Committee in previous concluding observations in assessing the implementation of International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Sector in Hong Kong
    THE PUBLIC SECTOR IN HONG KONG IN HONG PUBLIC SECTOR THE THE PUBLIC SECTOR IN HONG KONG his book describes and analyses the role of the public sector in the T often-charged political atmosphere of post-1997 Hong Kong. It discusses THE PUBLIC SECTOR critical constitutional, organisational and policy problems and examines their effects on relationships between government and the people. A concluding chapter suggests some possible means of resolving or minimising the difficulties which have been experienced. IN HONG KONG Ian Scott is Emeritus Professor of Government and Politics at Murdoch University in Perth, Australia and Adjunct Professor in the Department of Public and Social Administration at the City University of Hong Kong. He taught at the University of Hong Kong between 1976 and 1995 and was Chair Professor of Politics and Public Administration between 1990 and 1995. Between 1995 and 2002, he was Chair Professor of Government and Politics at Murdoch University. Over the past twenty-five years, he has written extensively on politics and public administration in Hong Kong. G O V E P O L I C Y Professor Ian Scott’s latest book The Public Sector in Hong Kong provides a systematic analysis of Hong Kong’s state of governance in the post-1997 period Ian Scott R and should be read by government officials, politicians, researchers, students and N general readers who seek a better understanding of the complexities of the city’s M government and politics. E — Professor Anthony B. L. Cheung, President, The Hong Kong Institute of Education; N T Member, Hong Kong SAR Executive Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Now Is the Time to Give Civic Party Its Last Rites
    8 | Wednesday, April21, 2021 HONG KONG EDITION | CHINA DAILY COMMENTHK Yang Sheng Now is the time to give Harris’ antics Civic Party its last rites threaten to bring Grenville Cross says the political group has done more harm HKBA down to Hong Kong than any other and its departure is long overdue aul Harris, a former British politician and current chair- man of the Hong Kong Bar Association (HKBA), spouted some uneducated theories that fully exposed his hypo- n November 11, 2020, the the national anthem law, both of which Hong critical self in a recent interview, in which he questioned National People’s Con- Kong was constitutionally obliged to enact. In Pthe legitimacy of the National People’s Congress’ (NPC) decision gress Standing Committee consequence, there was legislative gridlock, to improve Hong Kong’s electoral system, claiming that the vet- (NPCSC) adopted a resolu- with 14 bills and 89 items of subsidiary legisla- ting of candidates by a review committee may violate voter rights tion whereby members of tion being blocked, many a ecting people’s by limiting their choices. However, he failed to mention the fact the Hong Kong Legislative livelihoods. Although the deadlock was fi nally that vetting candidates is a common practice around the world to Council immediately lost Grenville Cross broken on May 18, no thanks to Kwok, his ensure national security or other national interests. Would Paul their seats if, in violation of their oaths of The author is a senior counsel, law professor was an unprecedented move to paralyze the Harris, who served as a councilor of Oxford city in the past, cast and criminal justice analyst, and was previ- o ce, they were deemed to have engaged in Legislative Council, and to prevent it from dis- the same human rights abuse suspicion over the relevant laws of O ously the director of public prosecutions of charging the legislative functions required of various nefarious activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World 2018 Hong Kong
    Hong Kong * Page 1 of 9 Published on Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org) Home > Hong Kong * Hong Kong * Country: Hong Kong * Year: 2018 Freedom Status: Partly Free Political Rights: 5 Civil Liberties: 2 Aggregate Score: 59 Freedom Rating: 3.5 Overview: The people of Hong Kong, a special administrative region of China, have traditionally enjoyed substantial civil liberties and the rule of law under their local constitution, the Basic Law. However, the chief executive and half of the Legislative Council are chosen through indirect electoral systems that favor pro-Beijing interests, and the territory’s freedoms and autonomy have come under threat in recent years due to growing political and economic pressure from the mainland. Trend Arrow: Hong Kong received a downward trend arrow due to the expulsion of four prodemocracy lawmakers from the legislature, jail sentences against protest leaders, and other apparent efforts by pro-Beijing authorities to stamp out a movement calling for local self- determination. Political Rights and Civil Liberties: POLITICAL RIGHTS: 15 / 40 (−1) A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 2 / 12 (−1) https://freedomhouse.org/print/50009 3/26/2018 Hong Kong * Page 2 of 9 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 0 / 4 Under 2010 electoral reforms, the chief executive, who serves a five-year term, is chosen by a 1,200-member election committee. Some 200,000 “functional constituency” voters—representatives of elite business and social sectors, many with close Beijing ties—elect 900 of the committee’s members, and the remaining 300 consist of Legco members, Hong Kong delegates to China’s National People’s Congress (NPC), religious representatives, and Hong Kong members of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), a Chinese government advisory body.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgments 鳴謝附錄 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 鳴謝
    附錄 Acknowledgments 鳴謝附錄 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 鳴謝 The Federation would like to express its most sincere thanks to the following donors and supporters for their generous help during the year 2015-16. 本會謹向二零一五至一六年度慷慨捐助和支持本會的社會各界人士和團體，致以謝意。 (in alphabetical order 按英文字母順序排列) Major Collaborators, Ng Teng Fong Charitable Foundation Partners and Sponsors Partnership Fund for the Disadvantaged American Express Ping Wo Fund Au Bak Ling Charity Trust Prince Jewellery & Watch Co. Beat Drugs Fund Prudential Hong Kong Ltd. Board of Management of Chinese Permanent Cemeteries, Quality Education Fund The Sino Group Burberry Foundation Sir David Trench Fund for Recreation Commission on Youth Sir Robert Black Trust Fund Commissioner for Heritage’s Offi ce Social Welfare Department Committee on the Promotion of Civic Education Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd. Community Chest of Hong Kong, The Tourism Commission Development Bureau Verdant Foundation, The Education Bureau Victor and William Fung Foundation Ltd. Environment and Conservation Fund 林清伉儷慈善基金 Environmental Protection Department Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau Businesses Hang Seng Bank Home Affairs Bureau 3D-Gold Jewellery (HK) Ltd. Hong Kong Council of Social Service, The 3D-Gold Management Services Ltd. Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust, The 4M Industrial Development Ltd. Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation A.S. Watson Retail (HK) Ltd. Hongkong Bank Foundation A-1 Bakery Co., (HK) Ltd. HSBC Commercial Banking Access Academic Consultancy Innovation and Technology Fund adidas Hong Kong Ltd. Keswick Foundation, The Adtactics Marketing International Ltd. Lee Hysan Foundation Advance Multimedia Co. Ltd. Lotteries Fund Ael Enterprises (HK) Ltd. Mission Hills Golf Club Allegro (HK) Ltd. 183 Acknowledgments 鳴謝附錄 Amber Beauty Chan & Young Solicitors Easy Group (Hong Kong) Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • CEE 1992-2001 & Western Europe
    Genuinely New Parties in Eastern Europe Appendix to Sikk, Allan (2005). “How Unstable? Volatility and the Genuinely New Parties in Eastern Europe,” European Journal of Political Research, 44(1): 391-412. The following tables show vote and seat shares for genuinely new parties. Other parties that might be considered new are listed with comments on why they do not qualify as genuinely extra- parliamentary. The comments are normally derived from Rose et al (1998), references are given only to other sources. Bulgaria 1991 votes% seats% 6 BANU Nikola Petkov 3.4 0.0 7 UDF (Centre) 3.2 0.0 8 UDF (Liberal) 2.8 0.0 9 Kingdom of Bulgaria 1.8 0.0 10 Bulgarian Business Bloc 1.3 0.0 11 Bulgarian National Radicals 1.1 0.0 13 Bulgarian Communists 0.7 0.0 Others and independents 6.6 0.0 11.5 0.0 6, 7 and 8 were successors of Union of Democratic forces (2) in 1990. Bulgaria 1994 votes% seats% 3 BANU 6.5 7.5 9 Kingdom of Bulgaria 1.4 0.0 10 Bulgarian Business Bloc 4.7 5.4 11 Bulgarian National Radicals 0.5 0.0 13 Bulgarian Communists 1.5 0.0 Others and independents 5.6 0.0 13.7 5.4 3 was present in parliament until 1991. Bulgaria 1997 votes% seats% 11 Bulgarian National Radicals 0.2 0.0 13 Bulgarian Communists 1.2 0.0 16 Alliance for National Salvation 7.7 7.9 Others and independents 3.5 0.0 4.9 0.0 16 is a merger of Movement for Rights and Freedom (4) and Kingdom of Bulgaria (9).
    [Show full text]
  • Cvs of Honorary Fellowship Recipients
    CVs of Honorary Fellowship recipients Mrs Chan-Chen Shu-an Mrs Chan-Chen Shu-an was one of the pioneers in advocating quality early childhood education in Hong Kong. She played a key role in advocating the activity approach in the local early childhood education context. One of the founders and lecturer of the Hong Kong Kindergarten Teacher Training Course organised by the School of Continuing and Professional Studies of the Chinese University of Hong Kong in the 1980s, she has over the past 30 years laid a solid foundation for early childhood education teacher training and curriculum through her tireless contributions. Dr Darwin Chen Dr Darwin Chen is an alumnus of the Northcote College of Education. He obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree with First Class Honours from the University of London in 1960. His 32-year career in the Hong Kong civil service included several leading positions in government departments. Since he retired, Dr Chen has continued to serve Hong Kong and the region through various public bodies. In recognition of his service to Hong Kong, he was made a Companion of the Imperial Service Order in 1990 and awarded the Silver Bauhinia Star in 2003. Mr Eddie Ng Hak-kim A devoted and experience specialist in the field of human resource management, Mr Ng Hak-kim, Eddie has over 27 years of professional human resources management experience in multinational corporations. Mr Ng has also made significant contributions to the development of the HKIEd during his time as Council Member (2002-2004), Vice Chairman of the Staffing Committee (2002-2004), Chairman of the Staffing Committee (2004-2010) and Deputy Chairman of the Council (2004-2010) Mr Ng is currently an Ex-officio Member of the Education Commission, and Chairman of the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL RECORD of PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 14 May
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 14 May 2015 10457 OFFICIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 14 May 2015 The Council continued to meet at half-past Two o'clock MEMBERS PRESENT: THE PRESIDENT THE HONOURABLE JASPER TSANG YOK-SING, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ALBERT HO CHUN-YAN THE HONOURABLE LEE CHEUK-YAN THE HONOURABLE JAMES TO KUN-SUN THE HONOURABLE CHAN KAM-LAM, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG YIU-CHUNG DR THE HONOURABLE LAU WONG-FAT, G.B.M., G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE EMILY LAU WAI-HING, J.P. THE HONOURABLE TAM YIU-CHUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE TOMMY CHEUNG YU-YAN, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE FREDERICK FUNG KIN-KEE, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE VINCENT FANG KANG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-HING, B.B.S., M.H. 10458 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 14 May 2015 PROF THE HONOURABLE JOSEPH LEE KOK-LONG, S.B.S., J.P., Ph.D., R.N. THE HONOURABLE JEFFREY LAM KIN-FUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ANDREW LEUNG KWAN-YUEN, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG TING-KWONG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CYD HO SAU-LAN, J.P. THE HONOURABLE STARRY LEE WAI-KING, J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN KIN-POR, B.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHEUNG KWOK-CHE THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-KIN, S.B.S. THE HONOURABLE IP KWOK-HIM, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE MRS REGINA IP LAU SUK-YEE, G.B.S., J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook CPDS I 1960-2013
    1 Codebook: Comparative Political Data Set, 1960-2013 Codebook: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET 1960-2013 Klaus Armingeon, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler The Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2013 (CPDS) is a collection of political and institu- tional data which have been assembled in the context of the research projects “Die Hand- lungsspielräume des Nationalstaates” and “Critical junctures. An international comparison” directed by Klaus Armingeon and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. This data set consists of (mostly) annual data for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member coun- tries for the period of 1960 to 2013. In all countries, political data were collected only for the democratic periods.1 The data set is suited for cross-national, longitudinal and pooled time- series analyses. The present data set combines and replaces the earlier versions “Comparative Political Data Set I” (data for 23 OECD countries from 1960 onwards) and the “Comparative Political Data Set III” (data for 36 OECD and/or EU member states from 1990 onwards). A variable has been added to identify former CPDS I countries. For additional detailed information on the composition of government in the 36 countries, please consult the “Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Com- position 1960-2013”, available on the CPDS website. The Comparative Political Data Set contains some additional demographic, socio- and eco- nomic variables. However, these variables are not the major concern of the project and are thus limited in scope. For more in-depth sources of these data, see the online databases of the OECD, Eurostat or AMECO.
    [Show full text]
  • Carrie Lam Becomes Fifth Hong Kong Chief Executive
    REVIEW September 2017 Hong Kong Economic HONG and Trade Office, London KONG Carrie Lam becomes fifth Hong Kong Chief Executive arrie Lam was sworn in as Chief Executive of Hong Kong on Right: President Xi (first right) swears in July 1 at a special ceremony attended by China’s President Mrs Carrie Lam as CXi Jinping, who was in Hong Kong to mark the 20th Hong Kong’s fifth anniversary of the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Chief Executive. Administrative Region (HKSAR). Speaking after her inauguration, Mrs Lam promised to repay the trust and support of the people and central government. “My vision is for a Hong Kong of hope and happiness – a city that we are all proud to call our home. I see a vibrant international metropolis that is just, civilised, safe, affluent, blessed with the rule of law,” she said. Mr Xi also swore in the other officials of Mrs Lam’s new government and members of the executive council during the Left: A flag raising ceremony at ceremony held at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre. Golden Bauhinia Mrs Lam, whose term of office runs until 2022, becomes Hong Square marks the Kong’s fifth Chief Executive and the first woman to hold the post. In 20th anniversary of the return of Hong her first full day as Chief Executive she visited people in the North Kong to Chinese District, Kowloon City District and Central and Western District sovereignty. (more on page 2). President Xi visits Hong Kong President Xi Jinping arrived in Hong Kong on world-class museums, theatres, concert halls June 30 to attend celebrations to mark the 20th and performance venues – signing an anniversary of the establishment of the HKSAR.
    [Show full text]