DOCSLIB.ORG

Western Processional Way

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Western Processional Way Western Processional Way Originally built by Pinedjem - 1054 BCE to 1039 BCE Modified by Shoshenq I - 945 BCE to 924 BCE Modified by Taharqo - 690 BCE to 664 BCE Modified by Unknown Roman ruler - 29 BCE to 395 CE Other works initiated by Shoshenq I: Bubastite Portal, Shoshenq I Court Other works initiated by Taharqo: Taharqo Kiosk, Taharqo Edifice and Nilom- eter, Ramesses II Eastern Temple, Khonsu Temple Introduction Recumbent, ram-headed sphinxes on rectangular pedestals line the western entrance into Karnak temple. Osiride statuettes of Ramesses II stand between the front paws of the sphinxes. At the temple today, forty sphinxes grace the entrance to Pylon I, and fifty-two are contained within the Shoshenq Court. Traces of the original paint still remains on the some of the sphinxes. Measurements: The pedestals measure 1.35m across by 1.70m deep, with a height of 0.43m. The sphinxes themselves vary between 3.6m-3.8m in length and 1.1m-1.2m in width. Phase: Pinudjem Pinedjem, a “high priest of Amun” at Karnak temple, placed some 100 sphinxes Western Processional Way in its existing state. along the 200m processional pathway that stretched from the entrance of the temple of the time (Pylon II) to the temple quay. The sphinxes (originally carved during the reign of Amenhotep III and Thutmose IV) were probably cited at Luxor temple (about 2km south of Karnak) since the 19th Dynasty, where they were moved and usurped by Ramesses II. Pinedjem seems to have shifted the sphinxes from Luxor to Karnak, adding his name to them as well. Construction materials: sandstone About the reconstruction model of this phase Due to the complex nature of modeling statuary, a high resolution sphinx model was purchased from 3D Cad Browser, an image uploaded Western Processional Way by Timothy Tokoas in 2002. The sphinx was modified extensively by Itay Zaharoaits in 2008 specifically for the Digital Karnak project. Imagery of the sphinxes taken at Karnak was added to the model to better recreate the appearance of the ancient statue. A simple sandstone pattern was added to the base. This single sphinx statue was duplicated to create the over 100 sphinxes represented on the model. Phase: Shoshenq I With the construction of his new first court to the temple, the line of sphinxes must have been nearly cut in half. Some remained in the court (their arrangement at this time is unknown), while some were placed before the new western gate to the temple. Phase: Taharqo During the reign of Taharqo, the addition of a large central kiosk in the Shoshenq I Court may have necessitated the regrouping of the sphinxes along the northern and southern walls of the first court. This is the arrangement of the sphinxes at the temple today. Phase: Roman era The sphinxes outside the temple complex were regrouped again in the Roman Period and have remained in this location down to the present time. A space was left between the 7th and 8th sphinxes to give access to the complex of structures south of the quay. Renderings of the Western Processional Bibliography and Sources Used for Model Construction Way as completed during the reign of Pinudjem. Cabrol, Agnès (2001), Les voies processionnelles de Thèbes. Leuven: Peeters, xxxviii, 853 p.. Lauffray, Jean (1971), “Abords occidentaux du premier pylône de karnak, le dromos, la tribune et les aménagements portuaires.” Kêmi: revue de philologie et d’archéologie égyptiennes et coptes, vol. 21, 77-144. Further reading Murnane, William (1979), “The Bark of Amun on the Third Pylon at Karnak.” Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt, vol. 16, 11-27. © 2008 All rights reserved. Sullivan 2008, Western Processional Way. Digital Karnak. 2 Regents of the University of California..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reading G Uide
    1 Reading Guide Introduction Pharaonic Lives (most items are on map on page 10) Bodies of Water Major Regions Royal Cities Gulf of Suez Faiyum Oasis Akhetaten Sea The Levant Alexandria Nile River Libya Avaris Nile cataracts* Lower Egypt Giza Nile Delta Nubia Herakleopolis Magna Red Sea Palestine Hierakonpolis Punt Kerma *Cataracts shown as lines Sinai Memphis across Nile River Syria Sais Upper Egypt Tanis Thebes 2 Chapter 1 Pharaonic Kingship: Evolution & Ideology Myths Time Periods Significant Artifacts Predynastic Origins of Kingship: Naqada Naqada I The Narmer Palette Period Naqada II The Scorpion Macehead Writing History of Maqada III Pharaohs Old Kingdom Significant Buildings Ideology & Insignia of Middle Kingdom Kingship New Kingdom Tombs at Abydos King’s Divinity Mythology Royal Insignia Royal Names & Titles The Book of the Heavenly Atef Crown The Birth Name Cow Blue Crown (Khepresh) The Golden Horus Name The Contending of Horus Diadem (Seshed) The Horus Name & Seth Double Crown (Pa- The Nesu-Bity Name Death & Resurrection of Sekhemty) The Two Ladies Name Osiris Nemes Headdress Red Crown (Desheret) Hem Deities White Crown (Hedjet) Per-aa (The Great House) The Son of Re Horus Bull’s tail Isis Crook Osiris False beard Maat Flail Nut Rearing cobra (uraeus) Re Seth Vocabulary Divine Forces demi-god heka (divine magic) Good God (netjer netjer) hu (divine utterance) Great God (netjer aa) isfet (chaos) ka-spirit (divine energy) maat (divine order) Other Topics Ramesses II making sia (Divine knowledge) an offering to Ra Kings’ power
    [Show full text]
  • French-Egyptian Centre for the Study of the Temples of Karnak
    FRENCH-EGYPTIAN CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF THE TEMPLES OF KARNAK Luxor, 2017 Ministry of Antiquities of Egypt Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Ministère des Affaires Étrangères et du Développement International FRENCH-EGYPTIAN CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF THE TEMPLES OF KARNAK ACTIVITY REPORT 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................ 4 1. SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMMES ................................................................................................................ 7 1.1. Power and marks of Power at Karnak ........................................................................................ 7 1.1.1. The Sphinx of Pinudjem ............................................................................................................. 7 1.1.2. The 8th Pylon ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.2. Peripheral areas ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.2.1. The Temple of Ptah ................................................................................................................... 9 1.3. Cults and places of worship .......................................................................................................... 28 1.3.1. The Monuments of Amenhotep I ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology and the Gezer Connection— Solomon, Thutmose III, Shishak and Hatshepsut
    VIEWPOINT || JOURNAL OF CREATION 32(2) 2018 Chronology and the Gezer connection— Solomon, Thutmose III, Shishak and Hatshepsut Anne Habermehl Solomon’s father-in-law is shown to have been 18th-Dynasty Thutmose III, who captured and burned Gezer and presented it to his daughter, Solomon’s bride, as a wedding present. The reign of Hatshepsut, aunt/stepmother to Thutmose III, possibly overlapped with Solomon’s early reign for a few years (although she was not the Queen of Sheba). Arguments that Shishak was Rameses II are shown to be flawed. A difference of about 470 years between the biblical and secular chronologies at the time of Solomon is therefore postulated. This moves all post-Thutmose III history forward into the first millennium bc. he subject of correlation of the biblical and secular chro- The importance of this bride to Solomon is shown by the Tnologies is of great importance, not only for determining several mentions of her in Scripture (I Kings 3:1, 7:8, 9:16, when events really happened, but especially for biblical 9:24, 11:1; II Chron. 8:11).5 Solomon even built the Egyptian apologetics. From this point of view, one of the significant princess her own palace (I Kings 7:8); she is the only wife for events in history is the destruction of Gezer by the pharaoh whom it is stated in Scripture that Solomon did this. Not only who married his daughter to Solomon. This allows us to that, but the princess’s palace was part of Solomon’s palace calculate how far apart the two chronologies are at that time complex, as is clear from I Kings 7:7–12.
    [Show full text]
  • Afterglow of Empire: Egypt from the Fall of the New Kingdom to the Saite Renaissance
    Palestine Exploration Quarterly ISSN: 0031-0328 (Print) 1743-1301 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ypeq20 Afterglow of Empire: Egypt from the Fall of the New Kingdom to the Saite Renaissance Peter James To cite this article: Peter James (2017) Afterglow of Empire: Egypt from the Fall of the New Kingdom to the Saite Renaissance, Palestine Exploration Quarterly, 149:4, 336-339, DOI: 10.1080/00310328.2017.1400834 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00310328.2017.1400834 Published online: 18 Dec 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ypeq20 Download by: [Peter James] Date: 18 December 2017, At: 14:22 Palestine Exploration Quarterly, , (), – REVIEW Dodson, A., Afterglow of Empire: Egypt from the Fall of the New Kingdom to the Saite Renaissance, . Pp. xxviii + , numerous illustrations. Cairo/New York: The American University in Cairo Press. ISBN - ---. Price: £.. Afterglow of Empire joins Aidan Dodson’s ever-growing series of books covering various periods and aspects of Egyptian history and archaeology. This volume treats the Third Intermediate Period (st to th Dynasties), with opening and concluding chapters on the last Ramesside rulers of the th Dynasty and the Egyptian ‘renaissance’ under the th Dynasty. Handsomely produced, the book is well bound, with proper stitching and a cover which does not curl back on itself! The paper is of good quality which, given the constraints of page size, allows the excel- lent reproduction of some illustrations — mainly the author’s own photographs.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS IMPACTS OF LONG -T ERM CROSS -C ULTURAL MIGRATION BETWEEN EGYPT AND THE LEVANT Thomas Staubli university of fribourg, switzerland ABSTRACT An increase of cross-cultural learning as a consequence of increased travel and migration between Egypt and the Levant during the Iron Age occurred after millennia of migration in earlier times. The result was an Egyptian-Levantine koine, often not recognized as relevant by historians due to an uncritical reproduction of ancient myths of separation. However, the cultural exchange triggered by migration is attested in the language, in the iconography of the region, in the history of the alphabet, in literary motifs, in the characterization of central characters of the Hebrew Bible and, last but not least, in the rise of new religions, which integrated the experience of otherness in a new ethos. Egypt and the Levant: two areas that have countries. in reality, the relations between the eastern continually shaped societies and the advancement of Delta and the Levant were probably, for many centuries, civilization in both the past and the present.” more intense than the relations between the eastern delta “ —Anna-Latifa Mourad (2015, i) and Thebes. in other words, in order to deal seriously with the 1. I NTRODUCTION 1 Levant and northern Egypt as an area of intensive 1.1. T hE ChALLEngE : T hE EsTAbLishED usE of “E gypT ” AnD migration over many millennia and with a focus of the “C AnAAn ” As sEpArATE EnTiTiEs hinDErs ThE rECogniTion effects of this migration on culture, and especially religion, of ThE CrEoLizing EffECTs of MigrATion As highLy rELEvAnT the magic of the biblical Exodus paradigm and its for ThE hisTory of CuLTurEs AnD rELigions in ThE rEgion counterpart, the Egyptian expulsion paradigm, must be The impact of migration on religious development both in removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF (587.4
    Chronological table (Based on J� von Beckerath, Chronologie des pharaonischen Ägypten. Die Zeitbestimmung der ägyptischen Geschichte von der Vorzeit bis 332 v. Chr., Mainz am Rhein 1997)� Predynastic period dynasty 0, about 150 years Early dynastic period dynasty I, ca� 2982–2803 BC including pharaohs named Hor Aha (= Menes), Hor Dewen, Hor Semerkhet dynasty II, ca� 2803–2657 BC including pharaohs named Hor Hotepsekhemwy, Hor Nynetjer, Hor Sekhemib Old Kingdom dynasty III, ca� 2657–2589 BC including pharaohs named Nebka, Djoser (= Hor Netjerikhet), Djoser-tety (= Hor Sekhemkhet) dynasty IV, ca� 2589–2454 BC including pharaohs named Snofru, Cheops (= Khufu), Chephren (= Khafre), Mykerinos (= Menkaure), Shepseskaf dynasty V, ca� 2454–2297 BC including pharaohs named Userkaf, Sahure, Neferirkare Kakai, Shepseskare, Niuserre Ini, Djedkare Izezi dynasty VI, ca� 2297–2166 BC pharaohs named Teti, Userkare, Pepi I, Nemti-em-saf I (= Merenre), Pepi II, Nemti-em-saf II, Queen Nitokris ephemeral dynasties VII-VIII: dynasty VIII, ca� 2166–2120 BC First Intermediate Period dynasties IX-X (in Herakleopolis), ca� 2120–2020 BC Middle Kingdom dynasty XI (first in Thebes, later in the whole of Egypt), ca� 2119––1976 BC including pharaohs named Mentuhotep I–IV, Antef I–III dynasty XII, ca� 1976–1793 BC including pharaohs named Sesostris I–III, Ammenemes I–IV, Queen Nefrusobek Karol Jan Myliwiec - 9783631820612 Downloaded from PubFactory at 09/24/2021 04:34:59AM via free access 16 Chronological table Second Intermediate Period, ca� 1793–1550 BC ephemeral
    [Show full text]
  • Dead-Reckoning the Start of the 22Nd Dynasty: from Shoshenq V Back to Shoshenq I
    Dead-reckoning the Start of the 22nd Dynasty: from Shoshenq V back to Shoshenq I Robert Morkot and Peter James Kenneth Kitchen and other Egyptologists have claimed that a 10th-century BC date for Shoshenq I (founder of the 22nd Dynasty) can be arrived at not only from a philological identification with the biblical Shishak, but from chronological ‘dead- reckoning’ backwards through the Third Intermediate Period. One problem here is: where is the fixed point from which one begins retrocalculation? Kitchen himself counts backwards from his ‘Osorkon IV’, whom he identifies with the like-named king from the Piye Stela and the Shilkanni mentioned in Assyrian records in 716 BC. Yet there is no firm evidence that such an Osorkon ‘IV’ ever existed, while there is a mounting case for a return to the position of earlier Egyptologists that the king in question was the well-attested Osorkon III, presently dated to the first quarter of the 8th century BC. Equating him with the Osorkon of Piye would require lowering the dates of Osorkon III (and the last incumbents of the 22nd Dynasty) by some 40-50 years – a position strongly supported by archaeological, art-historical and genealogical evidence. Using these later dates, dead-reckoning backwards through the Dynasty (using the Pasenhor genealogy, Apis bull records and attested rather than imaginary reign lengths) brings us to a date for Shoshenq I in the second half of the 9th century. It would place him a century later than the biblical Shishak, making the equation of the two untenable. Another candidate needs to be sought for the biblical ‘king Shishak’.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheshonq (Shishak) in Palestine: Old Paradigms and New Vistas by Felix Höflmayer and Roman Gundacker
    Sheshonq (Shishak) in Palestine: Old Paradigms and New Vistas By Felix Höflmayer and Roman Gundacker Pharaoh Sheshonq I (c. 943-923 BCE) is traditionally viewed as the founder of the 22nd Dynasty, which, due to the king’s Libyan origins and main residence, is also referred to as Libyan or Bubastite Dynasty. What makes this king a corner stone for Egyptian-Levantine interrelations as well as Biblical Studies and archaeology alike is his report about campaigning in the southern Levant. According to 1 Kings 14:25-28 and 2 Chronicles 12:2-9, Pharaoh Shishak looted the temple in Jerusalem in the 5th year of Rehoboam taking with him plentiful bounty: “and he took away the treasures of the house of the LORD, and the treasures of the king’s house; he even took away all; and he took away all the shields of gold which Solomon had made”. Maps of sites mentioned in the text. When the inscription and great list of Sheshonq I on the south wall of the Bubastite Portal in Karnak were discovered, scholars immediately connected them with the narrative of the Hebrew Bible. Seemingly a perfect corroboration of the Biblical narrative, the royal inscription in Egypt offered one of the earliest external synchronisms for Biblical chronology. Aerial view of the temple of Karnak. (Photo by Ahmed Bahloul Khier Galal, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de) Bubastite Portal of the Temple of Karnak. (Photo by Olaf Tausch, CC BY 3.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.de) The link between the Egyptian inscription and the verses in the Hebrew Bible was perceived as even stronger and more reliable, after a fragment of a stela bearing the name of Sheshonq I was found in the excavations of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago at Megiddo.
    [Show full text]
  • Bubastite Portal
    Bubastite Portal Originally built by Shoshenq I - 945 BCE to 924 BCE Other works initiated by Shoshenq I: Western Processional Way, Shoshenq I Court Other walls: East Exterior Wall, North Exterior Wall, South Exterior Wall Introduction The temple’s first court was located between the first and second pylons. A small doorway leading off of this court, between the Ramesses III Temple and the sec- ond pylon, is today known as the “Bubastite portal” (Bubastis was the home city of the king responsible for the construction of the doorway). Inside the court, two closed papyrus columns marked the portal. Measurements: The door is just slightly less than 5m wide. Phase: Shoshenq I The exterior face of the “Bubastite portal” was marked by a series of relief scenes commemorating the great military victories of king Shoshenq I in Syro-Palestine. The scenes depict the king smiting his enemies while the god Amun and the god- Bubastite Portal in its existing state. dess of Thebes hold cords that bind the hands and throats of the captives. One hundred fifty-six “name rings” (symbols of bound captives with the names of ancient towns or peoples inside) decorate the wall and act as a list of the tribes and towns Shoshenq I claims to have defeated. Construction materials: sandstone About the reconstruction model of this phase Photographs taken at Karnak of the southern side of the “Bubastite portal” were placed directly onto the model. The images show how the portal ap- pears today. No attempt was made to repair any of the broken or damaged areas of the relief.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian New-Kingdom Topographical Lists: an Historical Resource with ‘Literary’ Histories
    Egyptian New-Kingdom Topographical Lists: An Historical Resource with ‘Literary’ Histories K.A. Kitchen University of Liverpool Bill Murnane always showed a clear, incisive grasp of the various epigraphic and historical matters that he dealt with; in his published works, he left an invaluable deposit of useful studies and observations that will long be of service to us all. I have happy memories of our rare meetings long since. I hope that this brief tribute may be found fitting. Introduction Lists of foreign place-names (so-called topographical lists) have long been recognized as a potential resource for historical, geographical and archaeological purposes in the study of Syria-Palestine in the Late Bronze age, and less usefully (in southern lists) for the Nile Valley and adjoining terrain south of Egypt proper (from Aswan). However, the varying types (and hence, equally variable nature) of such lists is not well understood by most people attempting to use them, and this matter is deserving of clearer definition for the general benefit of all who wish to utilize such lists in their studies. Non-egyptologists in particular need to know that one cannot pick names indiscriminately out of these lists, to use as instant history-pegs for the study of any given place in the Near East or NE Africa. Classification A. Types of Record: Physically Defined. These lists were included in several different types of context. 1. In Triumph-Scenes. From the 1st Dynasty to Roman times, the most persistent icon of pharaonic victory was that of the victorious king, striding forward with weapon upraised to bring it down on the heads of hapless, defeated foes half-kneeling confusedly before him.
    [Show full text]
  • The Campaign of Pharaoh Shoshenq I Into Palestine
    Forschungen zum Alten Testament 2. Reihe Herausgegeben von Bernd Janowski (Tübingen) • Mark S. Smith (New York) Hermann Spieckermann (Göttingen) 9 Kevin A. Wilson The Campaign of Pharaoh Shoshenq I into Palestine Mohr Siebeck KEVIN A. WILSON, born 1968; 1990 B.A., Carson-Newman College; 1993 M.Div., Yale Divinity School; 1994 S.T.M., Yale Divinity School; 2001 Ph.D., The Johns Hopkins University; currently teaching biblical studies at Lithuania Christian College in Klaipeda, Lithuania. ISBN 3-16-148270-0 ISSN 1611-4914 (Forschungen zum Alten Testament, 2. Reihe) Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnb.ddb.de. © 2005 by Mohr Siebeck Tubingen, Germany. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed by Guide-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Held in Rottenburg. Printed in Germany. Preface In January of 1997, I had the privilege to be a part of the Johns Hopkins excavations in Luxor, Egypt. I had already done several years of graduate work in the Old Testament, but this was my first hands-on experience with Egyptological field work. I was in the second year of my doctorate and had decided to focus on the connections between Egypt and Israel as part of my studies for a degree in Hebrew Bible. My decision to combine Egyptology with biblical studies was in large part due to the urging of my advisor, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Late-Egyptian Chronology and the Hebrew Monarchy Critical Studies in Old Testament Mythology, I K
    Late-Egyptian Chronology and the Hebrew Monarchy Critical Studies in Old Testament Mythology, I K. A. KITCHEN University of Liverpool In modern times, but at varying intervals, much scholarly attention has been devoted to the respective chronologies of Late-Period Egypt and the Hebrew Monarchy. A salient feature is that Kings and Chronicles contain a running series of datelines and data from which modern scholars can derive a chronology of the Hebrew Monarchy which, today, varies only within quite narrow limits1 -while from roughly 110011070 B.C., Late-Period Egypt before the Saites (that is, to 664 B.C.) appears, in contrast, as a period of obscurity, even confusion, with rival lines of little-known kings and seemingly very uncertain dates. However, by patiently collect­ ing, sifting, and setting in order not merely a handful of regnal dates from the monuments and Manetho, liberally sprinkled with conjecture, but a whole range of evidence (regnal dates; Manetho; genealogies of officials; Apis-bulls; changes in dating; etc.), it is possible to bring relatively close and coherent order into the entire epoch, and even to set quite narrow limits for the dates of its kings (21st to 25th Dynasties), the contemporaries of the Hebrew Monarchy. This task, the writer has attempted in some detail elsewhere;2 but it may be of service here to set out clearly and separately for biblical scholars some salient aspects having especial reference to Old Testament history that are even yet not properly grasped, despite warnings on the subject. [n particular, Old Testament scholars are sometimes prone to elevating theories into dogmas, and, even after conrrary facts have been made plain, are loth to give up their cherished idols and associated mythologies.
    [Show full text]