DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex 5 Report of the Working Group on Fish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ANNEX 5 REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON FISH STOCK ASSESSMENT (Hobart, Australia, 9 to 19 October 2000) CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 283 ORGANISATION OF THE MEETING AND ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA........................ 283 REVIEW OF AVAILABLE INFORMATION .............................................................. 283 Data Requirements Endorsed by the Commission in 1999 ............................................ 283 Data Inventory and Developments in the CCAMLR Database .................................... 283 Database Data Entry and Validation ................................................................. 284 Other .................................................................................................. 285 Fisheries Information .................................................................................... 285 Catch, Effort, Length and Age Data Reported to CCAMLR ...................................... 285 Estimates of Catch and Effort from IUU Fishing .................................................. 286 Landings by all Countries ........................................................................ 286 Estimated Trade in Dissostichus spp. in the 1999/2000 Split-year ............................ 286 Overall Estimates of IUU Catch ................................................................. 287 Indian Ocean Sector .......................................................................... 287 IUU Catches in Assessments .................................................................... 288 IUU and the CDS ................................................................................. 288 Catch and Effort Data for Fisheries for Dissostichus spp. in Waters adjacent to the Convention Area........................................................ 288 Scientific Observer Information..................................................................... 288 Research Survey Data................................................................................ 291 Mesh/Hook Selectivity and related Experiments affecting Catchability........................... 292 Conversion Factors................................................................................... 292 Advice to the Scientific Committee.............................................................. 293 Fish and Squid Biology/Demography/Ecology ......................................................... 293 Dissostichus spp. ..................................................................................... 293 Age Determination Methods ..................................................................... 293 Length to Mass and Natural Mortality Coefficient (D. mawsoni) ............................. 294 Stock Structure................................................................................... 294 Gonad Maturity ................................................................................... 294 Stomach Contents ................................................................................ 295 Tagging Studies ................................................................................... 295 Champsocephalus gunnari ........................................................................... 295 Distribution........................................................................................ 295 Reproduction...................................................................................... 296 Feeding ............................................................................................ 297 Ectoparasites ...................................................................................... 297 Crabs .................................................................................................. 297 Sizes ............................................................................................... 297 Skates ................................................................................................. 298 Fish Identification .................................................................................... 299 Other Species ......................................................................................... 301 Developments in Assessment Methods ................................................................. 301 ASSESSMENTS AND MANAGEMENT ADVICE........................................................ 303 New and Exploratory Fisheries.......................................................................... 303 New and Exploratory Fisheries in 1999/2000 ...................................................... 303 New and Exploratory Fisheries Notified for 2000/01.............................................. 308 General Issues .................................................................................... 308 Review of Individual Notifications .............................................................. 309 Advice to the Scientific Committee ................................................................. 312 277 Assessed Fisheries ....................................................................................... 315 Dissostichus eleginoides.............................................................................. 315 South Georgia (Subarea 48.3) ................................................................... 316 Standardisation of CPUE ..................................................................... 316 Determination of Long-term Annual Yields using the GYM ............................... 318 Growth, Mortality and Fishing Selectivity .................................................. 318 Trends in Selectivity ...................................................................... 319 Recruitment and Natural Mortality........................................................... 320 Assessment.................................................................................... 322 Integration of CPUE into Assessment ....................................................... 323 Management Advice for D. eleginoides (Subarea 48.3) ................................... 323 South Sandwich Islands (Subarea 48.4) ........................................................ 323 Management Advice for D. eleginoides and D. mawsoni (Subarea 48.4) ................ 324 Ob and Lena Banks (Division 58.4.4) ........................................................... 324 Kerguelen Islands (Division 58.5.1) ............................................................. 324 Standardisation of CPUE in the Longline Fishery........................................... 324 Standardisation of CPUE in the Trawl Fishery ............................................. 325 Management Advice for D. eleginoides (Division 58.5.1) ................................. 325 Heard and McDonald Islands (Division 58.5.2) ................................................ 325 Length Frequency............................................................................. 326 Determination of Long-term Annual Yields using the GYM ............................... 326 Assessment.................................................................................... 326 Management Advice for D. eleginoides (Division 58.5.2) ................................. 327 General Advice.................................................................................... 327 Champsocephalus gunnari ........................................................................... 327 South Georgia (Subarea 48.3) ................................................................... 327 Past Assessment .............................................................................. 328 New Information Available in 2000.......................................................... 328 Commercial Fishing........................................................................... 328 Research Surveys ............................................................................. 329 Assessment at this Year’s Meeting .......................................................... 329 Closed Season................................................................................. 332 Management Advice for C. gunnari (Subarea 48.3) ....................................... 332 Kerguelen Islands (Division 58.5.1) ............................................................. 333 Management Advice for C. gunnari (Division 58.5.1) ..................................... 333 Heard and McDonald Islands (Division 58.5.2) ................................................ 333 Commercial Catch ............................................................................ 333 Management Advice for C. gunnari (Division 58.5.2) ..................................... 334 Other Fisheries ........................................................................................... 334 Other Finfish Fisheries ............................................................................... 334 Antarctic Peninsula (Subarea 48.1) and South Orkney Islands (Subarea 48.2).............. 334 Management Advice .......................................................................... 334 South Sandwich Islands (Subarea 48.4) ........................................................ 335 Management Advice .......................................................................... 335 Antarctic Coastal Areas of Divisions 58.4.1 and 58.4.2 ....................................... 335 Pacific Ocean Sector (Subareas 88.2 and 88.3)...............................................
Recommended publications
  • Fishes of the Eastern Ross Sea, Antarctica

    Fishes of the Eastern Ross Sea, Antarctica

    Polar Biol (2004) 27: 637–650 DOI 10.1007/s00300-004-0632-2 REVIEW Joseph Donnelly Æ Joseph J. Torres Tracey T. Sutton Æ Christina Simoniello Fishes of the eastern Ross Sea, Antarctica Received: 26 November 2003 / Revised: 16 April 2004 / Accepted: 20 April 2004 / Published online: 16 June 2004 Ó Springer-Verlag 2004 Abstract Antarctic fishes were sampled with 41 midwater in Antarctica is dominated by a few fish families and 6 benthic trawls during the 1999–2000 austral (Bathylagidae, Gonostomatidae, Myctophidae and summer in the eastern Ross Sea. The oceanic pelagic Paralepididae) with faunal diversity decreasing south assemblage (0–1,000 m) contained Electrona antarctica, from the Antarctic Polar Front to the continent (Ever- Gymnoscopelus opisthopterus, Bathylagus antarcticus, son 1984; Kock 1992; Kellermann 1996). South of the Cyclothone kobayashii and Notolepis coatsi. These were Polar Front, the majority of meso- and bathypelagic replaced over the shelf by notothenioids, primarily Ple- fishes have circum-Antarctic distributions (McGinnis uragramma antarcticum. Pelagic biomass was low and 1982; Gon and Heemstra 1990). Taken collectively, the concentrated below 500 m. The demersal assemblage fishes are significant contributors to the pelagic biomass was characteristic of East Antarctica and included seven and are important trophic elements, both as predators species each of Artedidraconidae, Bathydraconidae and and prey (Rowedder 1979; Hopkins and Torres 1989; Channichthyidae, ten species of Nototheniidae, and Lancraft et al. 1989, 1991; Duhamel 1998). Over the three species each of Rajidae and Zoarcidae. Common continental slope and shelf, notothenioids dominate the species were Trematomus eulepidotus (36.5%), T. scotti ichthyofauna (DeWitt 1970). Most members of this (32.0%), Prionodraco evansii (4.9%), T.
  • Advances in MARINE BIOLOGY

    Advances in MARINE BIOLOGY

    Advances in MARINE BIOLOGY VOLUME 46 ThisPageIntentionallyLeftBlank Advances in MARINE BIOLOGY Edited by A. J. SOUTHWARD Marine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK P. A. TYLER School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK C. M. YOUNG Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, University of Oregon P.O. Box 5389, Charleston, Oregon 97420, USA and L. A. FUIMAN Marine Science Institute, University of Texas at Austin, 750 Channel View Drive, Port Aransas, Texas 78373, USA Amsterdam – Boston – Heidelberg – London – New York – Oxford Paris – San Diego – San Francisco – Singapore – Sydney – Tokyo This book is printed on acid-free paper. ß 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Publisher. The appearance of the code at the bottom of the first page of a chapter in this book indicates the Publisher’s consent that copies of the chapter may be made for personal or internal use of specific clients. This consent is given on the condition, however, that the copier pay the stated per copy fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923), for copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying, such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale.
  • Ancient Climate Change, Antifreeze, and the Evolutionary Diversification of Antarctic Fishes

    Ancient Climate Change, Antifreeze, and the Evolutionary Diversification of Antarctic Fishes

    Ancient climate change, antifreeze, and the evolutionary diversification of Antarctic fishes Thomas J. Neara,b,1, Alex Dornburgb, Kristen L. Kuhnb, Joseph T. Eastmanc, Jillian N. Penningtonb,d, Tomaso Patarnelloe, Lorenzo Zanef, Daniel A. Fernándezg, and Christopher D. Jonesh aPeabody Museum of Natural History and bDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520 cDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701; dEzra Stiles College, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520 eDepartment of Public Health, Comparative Pathology and Veterinary Hygiene, Università di Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy; fDepartment of Biology, Università di Padova, 35131 Padua, Italy; gCentro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas, 9410 Ushuaia, Argentina; and hAntarctic Ecosystem Research Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service, La Jolla, CA 92037 Edited by David M. Hillis, University of Texas, Austin, TX, and approved January 25, 2012 (received for review September 15, 2011) The Southern Ocean around Antarctica is among the most rapidly they are more species-rich than their non-Antarctic sister line- warming regions on Earth, but has experienced episodic climate age (approximately 100 vs. one species) (9). Molecular di- change during the past 40 million years. It remains unclear how vergence time analyses have attempted to correlate the origin of ancient periods of climate change have shaped Antarctic bio- the AFGP-bearing Antarctic notothenioids with a period of diversity. The origin of antifreeze glycoproteins (AFGPs) in Ant- global cooling and widespread glaciation of Antarctica that be- arctic notothenioid fishes has become a classic example of how the gan at the onset of the Eocene–Oligocene boundary (14, 15), evolution of a key innovation in response to climate change can approximately 35 Ma (16, 17), leading to the conclusion that the drive adaptive radiation.
  • 2008-2009 Field Season Report Chapter 9 Antarctic Marine Living Resources Program NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-445

    2008-2009 Field Season Report Chapter 9 Antarctic Marine Living Resources Program NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-445

    2008-2009 Field Season Report Chapter 9 Antarctic Marine Living Resources Program NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-445 Demersal Finfi sh Survey of the South Orkney Islands Christopher Jones, Malte Damerau, Kim Deitrich, Ryan Driscoll, Karl-Hermann Kock, Kristen Kuhn, Jon Moore, Tina Morgan, Tom Near, Jillian Pennington, and Susanne Schöling Abstract A random, depth-stratifi ed bottom trawl survey of the South Orkney Islands (CCAMLR Subarea 48.2) fi nfi sh populations was completed as part of Leg II of the 2008/09 AMLR Survey. Data collection included abundance, spatial distribution, species and size composition, demographic structure and diet composition of fi nfi sh species within the 500 m isobath of the South Orkney Islands. Additional slope stations were sampled off the shelf of the South Orkney Islands and in the northern Antarctic Peninsula region (Subarea 48.1). During the 2008/09 AMLR Survey: • Seventy-fi ve stations were completed on the South Orkney Island shelf and slope area (63-764 m); • Th ree stations were completed on the northern Antarctic Peninsula slope (623-759 m); • A total of 7,693 kg (31,844 individuals) was processed from 65 fi nfi sh species; • Spatial distribution of standardized fi nfi sh densities demonstrated substantial contrast across the South Orkney Islands shelf area; • Th e highest densities of pooled fi nfi sh biomass occurred on the northwest shelf of the South Orkney Islands, at sta- tions north of Inaccessible and Coronation Islands, and the highest mean densities occurred within the 150-250 m depth stratum; • Th e greatest species diversity of fi nfi sh occurred at deeper stations on the southern shelf region; • Additional data collection of environmental and ecological features of the South Orkney Islands was conducted in order to further investigate Antarctic fi nfi sh in an ecosystem context.
  • Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean

    Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean

    Census of Antarctic Marine Life SCAR-Marine Biodiversity Information Network BIOGEOGRAPHIC ATLAS OF THE SOUTHERN OCEAN CHAPTER 7. BIOGEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF FISH. Duhamel G., Hulley P.-A, Causse R., Koubbi P., Vacchi M., Pruvost P., Vigetta S., Irisson J.-O., Mormède S., Belchier M., Dettai A., Detrich H.W., Gutt J., Jones C.D., Kock K.-H., Lopez Abellan L.J., Van de Putte A.P., 2014. In: De Broyer C., Koubbi P., Griffiths H.J., Raymond B., Udekem d’Acoz C. d’, et al. (eds.). Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean. Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, Cambridge, pp. 328-362. EDITED BY: Claude DE BROYER & Philippe KOUBBI (chief editors) with Huw GRIFFITHS, Ben RAYMOND, Cédric d’UDEKEM d’ACOZ, Anton VAN DE PUTTE, Bruno DANIS, Bruno DAVID, Susie GRANT, Julian GUTT, Christoph HELD, Graham HOSIE, Falk HUETTMANN, Alexandra POST & Yan ROPERT-COUDERT SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH THE BIOGEOGRAPHIC ATLAS OF THE SOUTHERN OCEAN The “Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean” is a legacy of the International Polar Year 2007-2009 (www.ipy.org) and of the Census of Marine Life 2000-2010 (www.coml.org), contributed by the Census of Antarctic Marine Life (www.caml.aq) and the SCAR Marine Biodiversity Information Network (www.scarmarbin.be; www.biodiversity.aq). The “Biogeographic Atlas” is a contribution to the SCAR programmes Ant-ECO (State of the Antarctic Ecosystem) and AnT-ERA (Antarctic Thresholds- Ecosys- tem Resilience and Adaptation) (www.scar.org/science-themes/ecosystems). Edited by: Claude De Broyer (Royal Belgian Institute
  • Análisis De Las Relaciones Tróficas Entre Peces Y Vertebrados

    Análisis De Las Relaciones Tróficas Entre Peces Y Vertebrados

    Tesis Doctoral Análisis de las relaciones tróficas entre peces y vertebrados ictiófagos de las Islas Orcadas del Sur, Antártida: Hacia el conocimiento integral del ecosistema y el manejo racional de los recursos Autora: Lic. Maria Lila Bertolin Director: Dr. Ricardo J. Casaux Co-director: Dr. Carlos Darrieu Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo Universidad de La Plata 2012 Dedico este trabajo a mis padres Agradezco a la gente de postgrado de la Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo de La Plata por la enorme paciencia y buena atención que me han dedicado estos 5 años, a la gente de becas de CONICET por el buen trato y la buena resolución frente a las dificultades y consultas, al Dr. Esteban Barrera-Oro por sus aportes y buena predisposición hacia todas mis dudas y al Dr. Fernando Momo por su rapidez y brillante ayuda. Índice de contenidos Resumen (español) i Resumen (inglés) v Capítulo I Introducción general 1 El continente antártico 1 Características físicas y biológicas 1 Aspecto geopolítico 9 La actividad pesquera en Antártida 9 La regulación del manejo de los recursos naturales y el medio-ambiente en Antártida 11 La importancia del desarrollo de políticas de manejo 13 Objetivos generales 14 Referencias bibliográficas 16 Capítulo II Composición general de la dieta 23 Introducción 23 Materiales y métodos 24 Área de estudio 24 Recopilación de información bibliográfica 25 Análisis de datos 25 Resultados 29 Composición general de la dieta, Islas Orcadas del Sur 29 Aves 29 Mamíferos 50 Composición general de la dieta, Islas Shetland del
  • Об Использовании Критерия Онтогенетического Предшествования На Примере Развития Скелета Нототениевидных Рыб (Notothenioidei, Perciformes, Teleostei)

    Об Использовании Критерия Онтогенетического Предшествования На Примере Развития Скелета Нототениевидных Рыб (Notothenioidei, Perciformes, Teleostei)

    Труды Зоологического института РАН Том 314, № 4, 2010, c. 387–404 УДК 57.017.645: 597.58 ОБ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИИ КРИТЕРИЯ ОНТОГЕНЕТИЧЕСКОГО ПРЕДШЕСТВОВАНИЯ НА ПРИМЕРЕ РАЗВИТИЯ СКЕЛЕТА НОТОТЕНИЕВИДНЫХ РЫБ (NOTOTHENIOIDEI, PERCIFORMES, TELEOSTEI) О.С. Воскобойникова Зоологический институт Российской академии наук, Университетская наб. 1, 199034 Санкт-Петербург, Россия; e-mail: [email protected] РЕЗЮМЕ Изучение ранних стадий развития скелета окунеобразных рыб из подотрядов Notothenioidei, Percoidei, Blennioidei, Zoarcoidei и Gobioidei выявило сходную последовательность появления скелетных элементов различного происхождения, которая соответствует таковой у других костистых рыб. Первыми в онтогенезе появляются хрящевые элементы черепа, осевого скелета и скелета хвостового плавника. После их возник- новения начинается закладка покровных костей. Позднее появляются замещающие кости. Во многих ко- стях комплексного происхождения покровные элементы также появляются раньше замещающих. Изучение преобразований строения различных отделов скелета в онтогенезе нототениевидных выявило значительно лучше выраженную лабильность костной ткани по сравнению с хрящевой. Показана большая функцио- нальная активность покровных костных элементов по сравнению с замещающими в костях комплексного происхождения. Сделано предположение, что значительная редукция покровного скелета в филогенезе по- звоночных животных во многих случаях была связана с процессом слияния покровных и замещающих ко- стей в комплексные кости, принимающие на себя функции обоих элементов. Последовательность
  • Investigating the Larval/Juvenile Notothenioid Fish Species Assemblage in Mcmurdo Sound, Antarctica Using Phylogenetic Reconstruction

    Investigating the Larval/Juvenile Notothenioid Fish Species Assemblage in Mcmurdo Sound, Antarctica Using Phylogenetic Reconstruction

    INVESTIGATING THE LARVAL/JUVENILE NOTOTHENIOID FISH SPECIES ASSEMBLAGE IN MCMURDO SOUND, ANTARCTICA USING PHYLOGENETIC RECONSTRUCTION BY KATHERINE R. MURPHY THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology with a concentration in Ecology, Ethology, and Evolution in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2015 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Professor Chi-Hing Christina Cheng, Director of Research Professor Emeritus Arthur L. DeVries Professor Ken N. Paige ABSTRACT Aim To investigate and identify the species found within the little-known larval and juvenile notothenioid fish assemblage of McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, and to compare this assemblage to the well-studied local adult community. Location McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Methods We extracted genomic DNA from larval and juvenile notothenioid fishes collected from McMurdo Sound during the austral summer and used mitochondrial ND2 gene sequencing with phylogenetic reconstruction to make definitive species identifications. We then surveyed the current literature to determine the adult notothenioid communities of McMurdo Sound, Terra Nova Bay, and the Ross Sea, and subsequently compared them to the species identified in our larval/juvenile specimens. Results Of our 151 larval and juvenile fishes, 142 specimens or 94.0% represented seven species from family Nototheniidae. Only one specimen was not matched directly to a reference sequence but instead was placed as sister taxon to Pagothenia borchgrevinki with a bootstrap value of 100 and posterior probability of 1.0. The nine non-nototheniid specimens represented the following six ii species: Pogonophryne scotti, Pagetopsis maculatus, Chionodraco myersi, Chionodraco hamatus, Neopagetopsis ionah, and Psilodraco breviceps.
  • Fisheries Centre Research Reports 2015 Volume 23 Number 1

    Fisheries Centre Research Reports 2015 Volume 23 Number 1

    ISSN 1198-6727 MARINE FISHERIES CATCHES OF SUBANTARCTIC ISLANDS, 1950 TO 2010 Fisheries Centre Research Reports 2015 Volume 23 Number 1 ISSN 1198-6727 Fisheries Centre Research Reports 2015 Volume 23 Number 1 Marine Fisheries Catches of SubAntarctic Islands, 1950 to 2010 Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada Marine Fisheries Catches of SubAntarctic Islands, 1950 to 2010 edited by Maria Lourdes D. Palomares and Daniel Pauly Fisheries Centre Research Reports 23(1) 48 pages © published 2015 by The Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6T 1Z4 ISSN 1198-6727 Marine Fisheries Catches of SubAntarctic Islands, 1950-2010, Palomares, MLD and Pauly D (eds.) Marine Fisheries Catches of SubAntarctic Islands, 1950 to 2010. M.L.D. Palomares and D. Pauly (editors) Fisheries Centre Research Reports 23(1) Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia Table of Contents Page Preface ii Fisheries of the Falkland Islands and the South M.L.D. Palomares and D. Pauly 1 Georgia, South Sandwich and South Orkney Islands The fish and fisheries of Bouvet Island A. Padilla, K. Zylich, D. Zeller and D. 21 Pauly A short history of the fisheries of Crozet Islands P. Pruvost, G. Duhamel, N. Gasco, 31 and M.L.D. Palomares La pêche aux îles Saint Paul et Amsterdam (with P. Pruvost, G. Duhamel, 37 an extended English abstract) F. Le Manach, and M.L.D. Palomares i Marine Fisheries Catches of SubAntarctic Islands, 1950 to 2010, Palomares, M.L.D., Pauly, D. (eds.) Preface This report presents catch 'reconstructions' for six groups of islands that are part of, or near the sub- Antarctic convergence: France's Crozet and St Paul & Amsterdam, Norway’s Bouvet Island and the United Kingdom's Falkland, South Georgia and South Sandwich, and Orkney Islands.
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Antarctic Notothenioids Illuminates the Utility of 7 Radseq for Resolving Cenozoic Adaptive Radiations

    Phylogenetic Analysis of Antarctic Notothenioids Illuminates the Utility of 7 Radseq for Resolving Cenozoic Adaptive Radiations

    0ROHFXODU3K\ORJHQHWLFVDQG(YROXWLRQ ² Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogenetic analysis of Antarctic notothenioids illuminates the utility of 7 RADseq for resolving Cenozoic adaptive radiations Thomas J. Neara,b,⁎, Daniel J. MacGuigana, Elyse Parkera, Carl D. Struthersc, Christopher D. Jonesd, Alex Dornburge a Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, CT 06520, USA b Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA c Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington, New Zealand d Antarctic Ecosystem Research Division, NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA e North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC 27601, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Notothenioids are a clade of ∼120 species of marine fishes distributed in extreme southern hemisphere tem- Notothenioidei perate near-shore habitats and in the Southern Ocean surrounding Antarctica. Over the past 25 years, molecular Phylogenomics and morphological approaches have redefined hypotheses of relationships among notothenioid lineages as well Phylogenetic informativeness as their relationships among major lineages of percomorph teleosts. These phylogenies provide a basis for in- Signal noise vestigation of mechanisms of evolutionary diversification within the clade and have enhanced our understanding Icefishes of the notothenioid adaptive radiation. Despite extensive efforts, there remain several questions concerning the phylogeny of notothenioids. In this study, we deploy DNA sequences of ∼100,000 loci obtained using RADseq to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of notothenioids and to assess the utility of RADseq loci for lineages that exhibit divergence times ranging from the Paleogene to the Quaternary.
  • Blood Physiology and Ecological Consequences in Weddell Sea Fishes (Antarctica)

    Blood Physiology and Ecological Consequences in Weddell Sea Fishes (Antarctica)

    Blood Physiology and Ecological Consequences in Weddell Sea Fishes (Antarctica) Blutphysiologie und ökologisch Konsequenzen von Fischen des Weddellmeeres (Antarktis) Andreas Kunzmann Ber. Polarforsch. 91 (1991) ISSN 0176 - 5027 Andreas Kunzmann Institut füPolarökologie Christian-Albrechts-Universitä zu Kiel, Olshausenstraß40-60, D-2300 Kiel 1, Bundesrepublik Deutschland Printed version of a Ph. D. Thesis of the mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlicheFakultä of the University of Kiel Druckfassung einer Dissertation füdie mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Fakultä der Christian-Albrechts-Universitäzu Kiel Summary ..................................................... l Zusammenfassung ............................................. 3 Introduction ................................................... 5 BLOOD FWNCTIONS ........................................ 5 FISHBLOOD .............................................. 5 Haematological adaptations ............................... 6 Multiple components .................................... 7 Haemoglobin structure and function .......................... 7 ANTARCTIC FISHES AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT ................. 10 Present knowledge in respiratory physiology .................... 12 HYPOTHESES ............................................. 14 Materials and Methods ..........................................15 COLLECTION OF FISHES ....................................15 ANALYSIS OF BLOOD SAMPLES .............................. 16 STRUCTURAL STUDIES .....................................24 FWNCTIONAL STUDIES
  • Aethotaxis Mitopteryx, a High-Antarctic Fish with Benthonelacric Mode of Life

    Aethotaxis Mitopteryx, a High-Antarctic Fish with Benthonelacric Mode of Life

    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 88: 33-40, 1992 Published October 29 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. l ~ Aethotaxis mitopteryx, a high-Antarctic fish with benthonelacric mode of life Andreas Kunzmann, Christopher Zimmermann Institute for Polar Ecology, Wischhofstr. 1-3, W-2300 Kiel 14, Germany ABSTRACT. Aethotaxis mitopteryx DeW~ttis one of the lesser known high-Antarctic fish species of the family Nototheniidae. W~thinthe last 7 yr close to 90 % of all reported specimens were caught in the Weddell Sea and the Lazarev Sea, with only 5 % of these in pelagic trawls. Average blomass values of ca 0.69 kg 30 min-l, which is 10 times the biomass values attained in the Weddell Sea, suggest the Lazarev Sea at depths between 400 and 800 m, or narrow shelf areas of the eastern Antarctic in general, to be a major distribution area of this species Due to new maximum values reported for length and weight (total length = 48 cm, fresh weigth = 855 g) currently recorded growth parameters have to be adjusted Adults are characterized by slow growth, high reproductive effort, a benthopelagic mode of life and regular occurrence in the warmer deep water. Due to the high abundance of A. mitopteryx larvae In the Weddell Sea, spawning migrations are likely. Structural and functional features of blood as well as observations from aquaria indicate a sluggish mode of l~feand a limited scope for activity. This and a number of adaptations to life In the pelagial suggest energy requirements to be low. INTRODUCTION continental slope was its major habitat (DeWitt 1970).