Queen Elizabeth's Visit to Tilbury in 1588
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Home Guard: the Forces to Meet the Expected French Invasions / 1
The Napoleon Series Home Guard: 1805 HOME GUARD: THE FORCES TO MEET THE EXPECTED FRENCH INVASION / 1 SEPTEMBER 1805 The Peace of Amiens lasted 14 months, until Britain declared war on France on 18 May 1803. Napoleon turned his attention to invading England, saying: "All my thoughts are directed towards England. I want only for a favourable wind to plant the Imperial Eagle on the Tower of London." He started to assemble an expeditionary force at Boulogne. The invasion scare started in the middle of 1803. In the next six months, the British government's call for volunteers to resist an invasion was met with a massive response; within a few weeks 280,000 men had volunteered, and the government was unprepared for this numbers of volunteers. The Invasion Scare lasted for roughly two years. Britain’s ‘Home Guard’ of an earlier era watched the coast of France nervously as the Emperor Napoleon assembled a vast armed camp centred on Boulogne, and named them the ‘Army of England’. On 26 August 1805, in response to dramatically changing political events in the east, the Emperor Napoleon ordered Marechal Berthier to send the newly-christened Grande Armèe on a line of march eastwards, ultimately towards Ulm, Vienna and the foggy hills of Austerlitz. Some 180,000 French troops left Boulogne. The Invasion Scare was over. The British Army to repel such an invasion, had it come, was as follows. Many of the General Officers were tasked with commanding the numerous Militia and Volunteer units, and seemingly often held multiple commands. This article, drawn from wide variety of articles and not all of a common date, presents as close a picture as can be discovered of the organisation and location of the regulars, militia and volunteers in the week Napoleon turned east. -
Tilbury Green Power Facility Planning Statement
Tilbury Green Power Facility Planning Statement February 2008 TILBURY GREEN POWER FACILITY PLANNING STATEMENT CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Need for Sustainable Energy 2.3 Choice of Site 2.4 Consultation 3.0 APPLICATION 3.1 Electricity Act 1989 3.2 Application for Consent 3.3 Carbon Assessment 4.0 LOCATION, SITE, OTHER PLANNING DECISIONS, DEVELOPMENT 4.1 Location 4.2 Site 4.3 Other Planning Decisions 4.4 Proposed Development 5.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.1 Background 5.2 Regional Planning Guidance for the South East 2001 – (RPG9) 5.3 Thurrock Borough Local Plan (1997) (TBLP) 6.0 OTHER MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS 6.1 Background 6.2 Draft East of England Plan 6.3 Government Planning Policy 6.4 Government Energy and Other Policies 6.5 Local Development Framework 6.6 Thurrock Thames Gateway 7.0 PLANNING ASSESSMENT 7.1 Background 7.2 Planning Assessment 8.0 CONCLUSIONS 8.1 Climate Change/Renewable Energy 8.2 Waste Management 8.3 Land Use 8.4 Environment 8.5 Transport 8.6 Economic 8.7 Overall DOCUMENTS A Alternative Site Survey B Abbreviations 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.0.1 This Statement accompanies an application (Application) to the Secretary of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) by Tilbury Green Power (TGP), seeking consent under Section 36 Electricity Act 1989 and deemed planning permission under Section 90 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to develop a 60 megawatt (MW) electricity generating plant at the former Cargill sweeteners manufacturing plant at Tilbury Docks (Site). This Application is viewed as EIA (environmental impact assessment) development and is accompanied by an environmental statement (ES). -
Tilbury Fort
Victorian Forts Thames 7 Tilbury Fort Commenced (1540) 1861 - 1905 re-armament Armament Completed Originally armed with 161 guns Cost £ 1805 - 14 x 42pdr. S.B. Map Reference TQ 552755 20 x 32 pdr.S.B. 35 x 9-pdr SB Position North bank of the Thames at 1859 - reduced to 32 guns Tilbury 1865 - 66 guns and eight howitzers, effective armament 5 x 68 pdr S.B. Type Bastioned land front with sea battery 5 x 32pdr. S.B. Ditch Wet 4 x 10-inch S.B. 1872 - 1881 - 7 x 9-inch RML 1 x 11-inch RML Guns 161 in 1716 1905 2 x 6-inch B.L. 4 x 12pdr. QF Barrack Accom. Present use Scheduled Ancient Monument History Continuously in use to present date Caponiers None Disposal Counterscarp Condition Excellent galleries None Access Open to the public Haxo casemates None Coast Defences of England and Wales - Hogg Sources Tilbury Fort - A handbook for teachers - Dale Moncrieff Pits None History and Description Originally built on the orders of Henry VIII in about 1540, under Charles II it became a regular Fort, bastioned and fully armed, in 1667. The present Tilbury Fort was designed by the King’s Chief Engineer, Bernard de Gomme. Under the orders of the 1859 Commissioners it was extended in 1861, a new magazine built and an 18-pounder field gun battery was installed. In 1865 the effective armament was reported as five 68-pounder smooth bore, five 32-pounder smooth-bore, and four 10-inch smooth-bore guns. In 1866 Parliament was asked for £50,000 in order to strengthen the river defences and add iron shields, but the Bill was withdrawn. -
Stanford-Le-Hope to Pitsea
A132 THE THAMES ESTUARY A13 LANGDON HILLS Stanford-le-Hope St. Michael’s Church, Pitsea Mount PATH ROUTES Vange Marsh TO BENFLEET 3 B1419 to Pitsea WWII Pillbox Pitsea Station H 10 mile walk between VANGE St. Margaret’s Church, Bowers Marsh TO STANFORD-LE-HOPE Basildon University Stanford-le-Hope and Pitsea Station. Pitsea Station Hospital A130 Some of the places of interest: HOPE’S GREEN Wat Tyler Country Park • Thurrock Thameside Nature Park • London Gateway Port B1006 VICARAGE HILL A13 HIGH ROAD • Stanford Warren Nature Reserve WWII Pillbox FOBBING • Corringham and Fobbing Marshes • Corringham Village • Vange Marshes Fobbing Marsh Nature Reserve • Vange Wick ESSEX WAY Wat Tyler Country Park Bower Marsh • Fobbing Village SOUTH BENFLEET B1420 Benfleet Station • Wat Tyler Country Park TO LEIGH-ON-SEA St Michael’s Church B1014 B SOUTHERN ROAD SP y R e b Imag A1014 St Mary the Virgin Church 4 Pitsea to Benfleet Stanford-le-Hope Station 3 ½ mile walk between Pitsea and • Pitsea Mount Church • Benfleet village and church Benfleet Station. • Wat Tyler Country Park • World War II Pillboxes STANFORD-LE-HOPE HORNDON ON THE HILLLondon Gateway Port • RSPB Bowers Marsh • St Micheal’s Church, Pitsea Mount Some of the places of interest: • Bowers Marsh Church • St Margaret’s Church, Bowers Marsh A128 TO EAST Stanford Wharf Nature Reserve TILBURY ~ RIVER THAMES ~ KING STREET Stanford-le-Hope Station STANFORD -LE-HOPE B1006 HADLEIGH A13 BENFLEET ROAD VICARAGE HILL Hadleigh Castle A13 ESSEX WAY BUCKINGHAM HILL ROAD HILL BUCKINGHAM TO PITSEA SOUTH BENFLEET BELTON WAY (W) LEIGH-ON-SEA Benfleet Station Hadleigh Country Park Leigh-on-Sea Station B1014 East Tilbury to TO PITSEA 2 Stanford-le-Hope 3½ mile walk between East Tilbury and Stanford le Hope Station. -
Fortress Study Group Library Catalogue
FSG LIBRARY CATALOGUE OCTOBER 2015 TITLE AUTHOR SOURCE PUBLISHER DATE PAGE COUNTRY CLASSIFICATION LENGTH "Gibraltar of the West Indies": Brimstone Hill, St Kitts Smith, VTC Fortress, no 6, 24-36 1990 West Indies J/UK/FORTRESS "Ludendorff" fortified group of the Oder-Warthe-Bogen front Kedryna, A & Jurga, R Fortress, no 17, 46-58 1993 Germany J/UK/FORTRESS "Other" coast artillery posts of southern California: Camp Haan, Berhow, MA CDSG News Volume 4, 1990 2 USA J/USA/CDSG 1 Camp Callan and Camp McQuaide Number 1, February 1990 100 Jahre Gotthard-Festung, 1885-1985 : Geschichte und Ziegler P GBC, Basel 1986 Switzerland B Bedeutung unserer Alpenfestung [100 years of the Gotthard Fortress, 1885-1985 : history and importance of our Alpine Fortress] 100 Jahre Gotthard-Festung, 1885-1985 : Geschichte und Ziegler P 1995 Switzerland B Bedeutung unserer Alpenfestung [100 years of the Gotthard Fortress, 1885-1985 : history and importance of our Alpine Fortress] 10thC castle on the Danube Popa, R Fortress, no 16, 16-24 1993 Bulgaria J/UK/FORTRESS 12-Inch Breech Loading Mortars Smith, BW CDSG Journal Volume 7, 1993 2 USA J/USA/CDSG 1 Issue 3, November 1993 13th Coast Artillery (Harbor Defense) Regiment Gaines, W CDSG Journal Volume 7, 1993 10 USA J/USA/CDSG 1 Issue 2, May 1993 14th Coast Artillery (Harbor Defense) Regiment, An Organizational Gaines, WC CDSG Journal Volume 9, 1995 17 USA J/USA/CDSG 2 History, The Issue 3, August 1995 16-Inch Batteries at San Francisco and The Evolution of The Smith B Coast Defense Journal 2001 68 USA J/USA/CDSG 2 Casemated 16-Inch Battery, The Volume 15, Issue 1, February 2001 180 Mm Coast Artillery Batteries Guarding Vladivostok,1932-1945 Kalinin, VI et al Coast Defense Journal 2002 25 Russia J/USA/CDSG 2 Part 2: Turret Batteries Volume 16, Issue 1, February 2002 180mm Coast Artillery Batteries Guarding Vladivostok, Russia, Kalinin, VI et al Coast Defense Journal 2001 53 Russia J/USA/CDSG 2 1932-1945: Part 1. -
Greater Thames Marshes Nature Improvement Area • Local Nature Partnership
Riverscapes An environmental vision for Thurrock 2013-23 Bata Reminiscence and Coalhouse Fort Project Davy Down Trust Resource Centre EWT Chafford Gorges Langdon Hills Country Ngage Nature Park Park & Friends Thames Chase Conservation Thurrock CVS Tilbury Fort Volunteers Tilbury Riverside Visit Essex Project Table of Contents Executive Summary INTRODUCTION i. Environment in Thurrock ii. Riverscapes Approach iii. Principles iv. Achievements so far PART ONE: Making Connections PART TWO: Delivering Change PART THREE: Celebrating Thurrock THE DELIVERY PLAN Executive Summary Thurrock's Vision is set out in the Community Strategy. "A place of opportunity, enterprise and excellence, where individuals, communities and businesses flourish" This is supported by five objectives. 1 Create a great place for learning and opportunity 2 Encourage and promote job creation and economic prosperity 3 Build pride, responsibility and respect to create safer communities 4 Improve health and well-being 5 Protect and promote our clean and green environment The environment is a key priority and Riverscapes is one of the plans that support the delivery of this. Over the last decade Thurrock has seen the delivery of world class environment sites spanning the borough from the RSPB Rainham Marshes to EWT Thurrock Thameside Nature Park. These have transformed the visual and natural environment of their local area, provided social, leisure and recreation opportunities for local people, contributed to the economy, and have helped improve the image of Thurrock. However individual sites are not enough to make the environment function for the long term, help us adapt to climate change, enable species to thrive or maximise the environments economic value. -
South Essex Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 Managing Flood Risk We Are the Environment Agency
South Essex Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 managing flood risk We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Kingfisher House Goldhay Way, Orton Goldhay Peterborough PE2 5ZR Tel: 08708 506 506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. December 2009 Introduction I am pleased to introduce our summary of the South Essex Catchment Flood Management Plan (CFMP). This CFMP gives an overview of the flood risk in the South Essex CFMP area and sets out our preferred plan for sustainable flood risk management over the next 50 to 100 years. The South Essex CFMP is one of 77 CFMPs for England flooding. Tidal flooding from the North Sea and the and Wales. Through the CFMPs, we have assessed inland estuaries, affects Burnham-on-Crouch, North and South flood risk across all of England and Wales for the first Fambridge, South Woodham Ferrers, Purfleet, Tilbury and time. The CFMP considers all types of inland flooding, Canvey Island. The lower reaches of the rivers Crouch, from rivers, ground water, surface water and tidal Horndon, Mardyke and Roach are also influenced by flooding, but not flooding directly from the sea (coastal tides. -
West Thurrock and South Stifford Ward
19 Chapter 19: West Thurrock and South Stifford ward This chapter summarises the activities in West Thurrock and South Stifford ward relating to the project’s construction and its operational phase (when the new road is open). It also explains the measures intended to reduce the project’s impacts on local communities. For more information about the assessments in this chapter and other information available during this consultation, see chapter 1, which also includes a map showing all the wards described in this document. West Thurrock and South Stifford ward does not include any elements of the project’s construction or operation. It has been included in our Ward impact summaries because it would experience impacts due to changes in traffic flows at the Dartford Crossing that are a result of the implementation of the Lower Thames Crossing. We predict a reduction in traffic flow at the Dartford Crossing of 21% in 2029, the project’s opening year, which would have an impact on journey times, noise and air quality in this ward. The reduction in traffic at the Dartford Crossing is one of the key objectives of the project. Within this document, we sometimes advise where additional information can be found in other consultation documents, including the Construction update, Operations update, You said, we did, Register of Environmental Actions and Commitments (REAC), Code of Construction Practice (CoCP), Outline Traffic Management Plan for Construction (OTMPfC) and Design principles. To find out more about these documents, see chapter 1. References to these documents provide an indication as to how our proposals to reduce the project’s impacts will be secured within our application for development consent. -
Esbex. MUNDON
DIRECTORY.] ESbEX. MUNDON. 439 Harrison Rev. Harry George M . .!. Clarkson Rd.Hy.frmr.MasterJohn's fm Jarvis Hy.Geo. George & Dragon P.H (vicar), Vioa.rage tCrawford Jant> W. (Mrs.), farmer, tKnight Alfred, farmer, Brands fano. tHodge Mrs. Chase view Lawness farm McCheyne George, farmer, The Hall Hodges Lionel l''rederick, Malbrooks Cumbers George, farmer, Woolwards McKay Rebecca (Mrs.), beer retailer Prosser Alfred E. St. Ann's DilliSell George William, beer retaile1· Macmorland John, farmer, Arnolds tSamuels Frederick tDrnm.mond James, farmer, Little *Nicholls Jn. B. frmr. Bellman's farm tlfaldron Thomas, Winnivere Cowbridge grange Roberts J. &:; Son, blacksmiths *Walmesley-Cotham Alfred, Tylhu;; Fisher Waiter Charles, blacksmith Samuel Charles, chimney sweeper tWoolnough James, Eden vale Frampton HPrbert George, grocer Smith Arth. Hy. frmr. Jordan's fa.,.,rmrn COMMERCIAL. Gould Thomas, coach builder Steven William, farmer, Chainbridge Agnis :Bobert, miller (wind) Goulden William Edward, shopkePpr. Weal James, beer retailer Bannister Hy. Jsph. frmr.Baker's frm & post office Wooltorton Hy. frmr. Swallow's cross Barues Samuel & Son, jobmasters tHodge Robert (M:rs ), farmer, Great *Blyth Isaac, farmer, Westlands Cowbridge grange MUCKING, anCiently written "Mocking," and in net yearly value £209, with 29 acres of glebe and resi Dome9day " Mucinga," is a parish on a creek of the dence, in the gitt of the Dean and Chapter of St. 'fhames of the same name, I mile south from the Stan Paul's, and held since I897 by the Rev. Charles Rich ford-le-Hope station on the London, Tilbury and South Nelson Burrows. There are two charities: the "Robin end railway, 4~ miles north-east of Tilbury Fort, 5~ east. -
Defence Archaeology
South East Research Framework Resource Assessment and Research Agenda for Defence (2013 with additions in 2019) Defence since the application of gunpowder: 1380- 2020 Victor Smith With contributions from Luke Barber, David Bird, Martin Brown, David Burridge, Chris Butler, Jonathan Coad, Wayne Cocroft, Ben Croxford, Paul Cuming, Ben Found, John Goodwin, Peter Kendall, John Kenyon, Andrew Saunders and John Wells Contents Resource Assessment ................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 Geographical factors and influences ................................................................... 3 The meaning of the region’s defences................................................................. 4 The defence heritage resource ............................................................................ 6 The beginning of the Age of Gunpowder................................................................. 6 Gunports in castles and town walls ..................................................................... 6 The role of firearms in fortifications as part of the strategy of defence ................ 6 The new age of long range artillery defence ........................................................... 7 The decline of the castle and walled town ........................................................... 7 The strengthening of the Crown and a new emphasis on systems -
Tilbury Fort Conservation Plan Draft V1 Prepared for English Heritage March 2018
Tilbury Fort Conservation Plan Draft v1 Prepared for English Heritage March 2018 Alan Baxter Draft How to use this document This document has been designed to be viewed digitally. It will work best on Comments Adobe Reader or Adobe Acrobat Pro versions X or DC or later on a PC or laptop. The document can be annotated with comments and amendments using the standard Adobe commenting tools. The comments tools will differ depending Navigation on your reader – here are instructions for Acrobat X and Adobe DC Reader: The document can be navigated in several ways: • Acrobat X: https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/feature-details/ • Via the bookmarks panel on the left hand side of the screen (revealed by acrobatpro/pdfs/adding-comments-to-a-pdf-document.pdf clicking ). • Adobe DC Reader: https://helpx.adobe.com/reader/using/share-comment- • Clicking on hyperlinks in the contents page or embedded in the text review.html (identified by blue text). • Using the search function (press Ctrl + F on your keyboard to bring up the Gazetteer (to follow) search box). If you are interested in one specific part of site you can go straight to the Gazetteer (Location of Gazetteer). It opens with navigation plans; clicking the • Using buttons at the bottom of each page: label for each area will take you to the relevant details. To access the navigation Contents plans at any time, click the ** button. Previous view Forward and back Site Plan Part 1: Conservation Plan Part 2: Gazetteer and Supporting Information (to follow) Tilbury Fort Conservation Plan / -
Download the Text Guide
THAMES ESTUARY PATH: Tilbury Town to Southend ! Introduction There has been a long-term ambition to create a path from Central London, through East London and Essex, to Southend for some time. Over the years numerous parts of the path have been achieved but many gaps remain. In 2008, the cycling and transport charity SUSTRANS carried out a complete survey of the path for the Department of Communities and Local Government (CLG) and this is on the CLG website if you search under “Thames Estuary Path”. The Thames Estuary Path through Essex is an amazing path taking you past Thameside Forts, ancient Churches, through Thames Marshes and along the sea wall over-looking internationally important marshes and mudflats. From Tilbury to Southend it is approximately 30 miles, but the route has the advantage of being shadowed by C2C railway line with stations at Tilbury Town, East Tilbury, Stanford-le-Hope, Pitsea, Benfleet, Leith, Chalkwell and Southend-on-Sea. This enables the walker or cyclist to do “short sections” and returning on the train. The beauty of this route is you can choose to start at one station and walk for as much as you like and then get the train back. The stations are generally 3 to 4 miles or 6 to 8 kms apart. When describing the route the distance from Tilbury Town station is shown in brackets when the path passes subsequent stations. Sensible Precautions All walking is inherently risky and before starting your journey you should consider: • Food and drink • Walking sticks (if necessary) • Sun screen (summer) • Warm and waterproof clothing • Sound footwear especially as many parts of the path are muddy outside summer.