Pseudocosmospora Hypoxylicola (Nectriaceae), a New Species from the French Alps
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fungal Systematics: Is a New Age to Some Fungal Taxonomists, the Changes Were Seismic11
Nature Reviews Microbiology | AOP, published online 3 January 2013; doi:10.1038/nrmicro2942 PERSPECTIVES Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants ESSAY (ICN). To many scientists, these may seem like overdue, common-sense measures, but Fungal systematics: is a new age to some fungal taxonomists, the changes were seismic11. of enlightenment at hand? In the long run, a unitary nomenclature system for pleomorphic fungi, along with the other changes, will promote effective David S. Hibbett and John W. Taylor communication. In the short term, however, Abstract | Fungal taxonomists pursue a seemingly impossible quest: to discover the abandonment of dual nomenclature will require mycologists to work together and give names to all of the world’s mushrooms, moulds and yeasts. Taxonomists to resolve the correct names for large num‑ have a reputation for being traditionalists, but as we outline here, the community bers of fungi, including many economically has recently embraced the modernization of its nomenclatural rules by discarding important pathogens and industrial organ‑ the requirement for Latin descriptions, endorsing electronic publication and isms. Here, we consider the opportunities ending the dual system of nomenclature, which used different names for the sexual and challenges posed by the repeal of dual nomenclature and the parallels and con‑ and asexual phases of pleomorphic species. The next, and more difficult, step will trasts between nomenclatural practices for be to develop community standards for sequence-based classification. fungi and prokaryotes. We also explore the options for fungal taxonomy based on Taxonomists create the language of bio‑ efforts to classify taxa that are discovered environmental sequences and ask whether diversity, enabling communication about through metagenomics5. -
Root Interactions with Non Pathogenic Fusarium Oxysporum. Hey
Root interactions with non pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum. Hey Fusarium oxysporum, what do you do in life when you do not infect a plant? Christian Steinberg, Charline Lecomte, Claude Alabouvette, Veronique Edel-Hermann To cite this version: Christian Steinberg, Charline Lecomte, Claude Alabouvette, Veronique Edel-Hermann. Root inter- actions with non pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum. Hey Fusarium oxysporum, what do you do in life when you do not infect a plant?. Belowground defense strategies in plants, Springer Interna- tional Publishing, 2016, Signaling and Communication in Plants, 978-3-319-42317-3 ISSN 1867-9048. 10.1007/978-3-319-42319-7. hal-01603982 HAL Id: hal-01603982 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01603982 Submitted on 5 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License Root Interactions with Nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum Hey Fusarium oxysporum, What Do You Do in Life When You Do Not Infect a Plant? Christian Steinberg, Charline Lecomte, Claude Alabouvette, and Ve´ronique Edel-Hermann Abstract In this review, we tried to present Fusarium oxysporum in an ecological context rather than to confine it in the too classic double play of the nonpathogenic fungus that protects the plant against the corresponding forma specialis. -
Observations on Early Fungal Infections with Relevance for Replant Disease in Fine Roots of the Rose Rootstock Rosa Corymbifera
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Observations on early fungal infections with relevance for replant disease in fne roots of the rose rootstock Rosa corymbifera ’Laxa’ G. Grunewaldt‑Stöcker 1, C. Popp1, A. Baumann2, S. Fricke1, M. Menssen3, T. Winkelmann 2* & E. Maiss1 Replant disease is a worldwide phenomenon afecting various woody plant genera and species, especially within the Rosaceae. Compared to decades of intensive studies regarding replant disease of apple (ARD), the replant disease of roses (RRD) has hardly been investigated. The etiology of RRD is also still unclear and a remedy desperately needed. In greenhouse pot trials with seedlings of the RRD‑sensitive rootstock Rosa corymbifera ‘Laxa’ cultured in replant disease afected soils from two diferent locations, early RRD symptom development was studied in fne roots. In microscopic analyses we found similarities to ARD symptoms with regards to structural damages, impairment in the root hair status, and necroses and blackening in the cortex tissue. Examinations of both whole mounts and thin sections of fne root segments revealed frequent conspicuous fungal infections in association with the cellular disorders. Particularly striking were fungal intracellular structures with pathogenic characteristics that are described for the frst time. Isolated fungi from these tissue areas were identifed by means of ITS primers, and many of them were members of the Nectriaceae. In a next step, 35 of these isolates were subjected to a multi‑locus sequence analysis and the results revealed that several genera and species were involved in the development of RRD within a single rose plant. Inoculations with selected single isolates (Rugonectria rugulosa and Ilyonectria robusta) in a Perlite assay confrmed their pathogenic relationship to early necrotic host plant reactions, and symptoms were similar to those exhibited in ARD. -
Thyronectria Revisited and Re-Instated
Persoonia 33, 2014: 182–211 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158514X685211 Persistent hamathecial threads in the Nectriaceae, Hypocreales: Thyronectria revisited and re-instated W.M. Jaklitsch1, H. Voglmayr1,2 Key words Abstract Based on type studies and freshly collected material we here re-instate the genus Thyronectria (Nec- triaceae, Hypocreales). Species of this genus were recently for the most part classified in the genera Pleonectria act (Nectriaceae) or Mattirolia (Thyridiaceae), because Thyronectria and other genera had been identified as members Ascomycota of the Thyridiaceae due to the presence of paraphyses. Molecular phylogenies based on several markers (act, ITS, Hypocreales LSU rDNA, rpb1, rpb2, tef1, tub) revealed that the Nectriaceae contain members whose ascomata are characterised Mattirolia by long, more or less persistent, apical paraphyses. All of these belong to a single genus, Thyronectria, which thus Nectriaceae has representatives with hyaline, rosy, green or even dark brown and sometimes distoseptate ascospores. The new species type species of Thyronectria, T. rhodochlora, syn. T. patavina, syn. T. pyrrhochlora is re-described and illustrated. Pleonectria Within the Nectriaceae persistent, apical paraphyses are common in Thyronectria and rarely also occur in Nectria. pyrenomycetes The genus Mattirolia is revised and merged with Thyronectria and also Thyronectroidea is regarded as a synonym rpb1 of Thyronectria. The three new species T. asturiensis, T. caudata and T. obscura are added to the genus. Species rpb2 recently described in Pleonectria as well as some species of Mattirolia are combined in the genus, and a key to tef1 Thyronectria is provided. Five species are epitypified. -
Cylindrocladium Buxicola Nom. Cons. Prop.(Syn. Calonectria
I Promotors: Prof. dr. ir. Monica Höfte Laboratory of Phytopathology, Department of Crop Protection Faculty of Bioscience Engineering Ghent University Dr. ir. Kurt Heungens Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO) Plant Sciences Unit - Crop Protection Dean: Prof. dr. ir. Guido Van Huylenbroeck Rector: Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe II Bjorn Gehesquière Cylindrocladium buxicola nom. cons. prop. (syn. Calonectria pseudonaviculata) on Buxus: molecular characterization, epidemiology, host resistance and fungicide control Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor (PhD) in Applied Biological Sciences III Dutch translation of the title: Cylindrocladium buxicola nom. cons. prop. (syn. Calonectria pseudonaviculata) in Buxus: moleculaire karakterisering, epidemiologie, waardplantresistentie en chemische bestrijding. Please refer to this work as follows: Gehesquière B. (2014). Cylindrocladium buxicola nom. cons. prop. (syn. Calonectria pseudonaviculata) on Buxus: molecular characterization, epidemiology, host resistance and fungicide control. Phd Thesis. Ghent University, Belgium The author and the promotors give authorisation to consult and to copy parts of this work for personal use only. Any other use is limited by Laws of Copyright. Permission to reproduce any material contained in this work should be obtained from the author. The promotors, The author, Prof. dr. ir. M. Höfte Dr. ir. K. Heungens ir. B. Gehesquière IV Een woordje van dank…. Dit dankwoord schrijven is ongetwijfeld het leukste onderdeel van deze thesis, en een mooie afsluiting van een interessante periode. Terugblikkend op de voorbije vier jaren kan ik enkel maar beamen dat een doctoraat zoveel meer is dan een wetenschappelijke uitdaging. Het is een levensreis in al zijn facetten, waarbij ik mezelf heb leren kennen in al mijn goede en slechte kantjes. -
Phylogeny and Taxonomy of the Genus Cylindrocladiella
Mycol Progress DOI 10.1007/s11557-011-0799-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Cylindrocladiella L. Lombard & R. G. Shivas & C. To-Anun & P. W. Crous Received: 10 June 2011 /Revised: 10 November 2011 /Accepted: 25 November 2011 # The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The genus Cylindrocladiella was established to the 18 new Cylindrocladiella species described in this study accommodate Cylindrocladium-like fungi that have small, based on morphological and sequence data, several species cylindrical conidia and aseptate stipe extensions. Contemporary complexes remain unresolved. taxonomic studies of these fungi have relied on morphology and to a lesser extent on DNA sequence comparisons of the internal Keywords Cylindrocladiella . Cryptic species . Phylogeny. transcribed spacer regions (ITS 1, 2 and 5.8S gene) of the Taxonomy ribosomal RNA and the β-tubulin gene regions. In the present study, the identity of several Cylindrocladiella isolates collected over two decades was determined using morphology and phy- Introduction logenetic inference. A phylogeny constructed for these isolates employing the β-tubulin, histone H3, ITS, 28S large subunit and The genus Cylindrocladiella was established by Boesewinkel translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene regions resulted in the (1982) to accommodate five Cylindrocladium-like species identification of several cryptic species in the genus. In spite of producing small, cylindrical conidia. Cylindrocladiella, which is based on -
An Ex-Type Culture Cannot Always Tell the Ultimate Truth
An ex-type culture cannot always tell the CORRESPONDENCE ultimate truth This note is prompted by the case of the isolates accurately matching the description Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson T-H (1980) generic name Ochroconis, a rather common of this species. The dried type culture Compendium of Soil Fungi. London: Academic genus of saprotrophic soil hyphomycetes, still shows the correct fungus and DNA Press. some of which grow occasionally on sequences of the other isolates representing Ellis MB (1971) Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. Kew: humans and fish. Von Arx, in the 1970s, this species can be taken as correct. Commonwealth Mycological Institute. being mainly interested in producing Unfortunate consequences arise when Ellis MB (1976) More Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. keys to identify fungal genera in culture a wrongly identified fungus is designated Kew: Commonwealth Mycological Institute. morphologically, did not believe that as an epitype of a species, as happened with Gams W (1971) Cephalosporium-artige Scolecobasidium terreum E.V. Abbott 1927 Hypocrea farinosa Berk. & Broome 1851 Schimmelpilze (Hyphomycetes). Stuttgart: G. with Y-shaped yellowish conidia, and for which Overton et al. (2000) designated Fischer. other species of this genus with darker, an epitype without studying the extant Gräfenhan T, Schroers H-J, Nirenberg HI, Seifert unbranched conidia were congeneric, holotype. It was left to Jaklitschet al. (2008) KA (2011) An overview of the taxonomy, as proposed by Barron & Busch (1962). to correct the situation and to resurrect the phylogeny, and typification of nectriaceous Therefore, he let his young staff member G. generic name Protocrea Petch 1937 for this fungi in Cosmospora, Acremonium, Fusarium, Sybren de Hoog describe a separate genus, fungus and its relatives, while Overton et al.’s Stilbella, and Volutella. -
Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska
The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O. -
Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Native Boxwood Forests of Georgia Final Report
Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Native Boxwood Forests of Georgia Final report Dr. Iryna Matsiakh Forestry Department, Ukrainian National Forestry University (Lviv) Tbilisi 2016 TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................................. 2 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................ 11 1.1. Biodiversity of Georgia ........................................................................................................................................ 11 1.2. Forest Ecosystems .................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3. Boxwood Forests in Forests Habitat Classification ................................................................................. 14 1.4. Georgian Forests Habitat in the Context of Climate Change -
Diversity of Biodeteriorative Bacterial and Fungal Consortia in Winter and Summer on Historical Sandstone of the Northern Pergol
applied sciences Article Diversity of Biodeteriorative Bacterial and Fungal Consortia in Winter and Summer on Historical Sandstone of the Northern Pergola, Museum of King John III’s Palace at Wilanow, Poland Magdalena Dyda 1,2,* , Agnieszka Laudy 3, Przemyslaw Decewicz 4 , Krzysztof Romaniuk 4, Martyna Ciezkowska 4, Anna Szajewska 5 , Danuta Solecka 6, Lukasz Dziewit 4 , Lukasz Drewniak 4 and Aleksandra Skłodowska 1 1 Department of Geomicrobiology, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1, 02-096 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 2 Research and Development for Life Sciences Ltd. (RDLS Ltd.), Miecznikowa 1/5a, 02-096 Warsaw, Poland 3 Laboratory of Environmental Analysis, Museum of King John III’s Palace at Wilanow, Stanislawa Kostki Potockiego 10/16, 02-958 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 4 Department of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1, 02-096 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] (P.D.); [email protected] (K.R.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (L.D.); [email protected] (L.D.) 5 The Main School of Fire Service, Slowackiego 52/54, 01-629 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 6 Department of Plant Molecular Ecophysiology, Institute of Experimental Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1, 02-096 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +48-786-28-44-96 Citation: Dyda, M.; Laudy, A.; Abstract: The aim of the presented investigation was to describe seasonal changes of microbial com- Decewicz, P.; Romaniuk, K.; munity composition in situ in different biocenoses on historical sandstone of the Northern Pergola in Ciezkowska, M.; Szajewska, A.; the Museum of King John III’s Palace at Wilanow (Poland). -
9B Taxonomy to Genus
Fungus and Lichen Genera in the NEMF Database Taxonomic hierarchy: phyllum > class (-etes) > order (-ales) > family (-ceae) > genus. Total number of genera in the database: 526 Anamorphic fungi (see p. 4), which are disseminated by propagules not formed from cells where meiosis has occurred, are presently not grouped by class, order, etc. Most propagules can be referred to as "conidia," but some are derived from unspecialized vegetative mycelium. A significant number are correlated with fungal states that produce spores derived from cells where meiosis has, or is assumed to have, occurred. These are, where known, members of the ascomycetes or basidiomycetes. However, in many cases, they are still undescribed, unrecognized or poorly known. (Explanation paraphrased from "Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th Edition.") Principal authority for this taxonomy is the Dictionary of the Fungi and its online database, www.indexfungorum.org. For lichens, see Lecanoromycetes on p. 3. Basidiomycota Aegerita Poria Macrolepiota Grandinia Poronidulus Melanophyllum Agaricomycetes Hyphoderma Postia Amanitaceae Cantharellales Meripilaceae Pycnoporellus Amanita Cantharellaceae Abortiporus Skeletocutis Bolbitiaceae Cantharellus Antrodia Trichaptum Agrocybe Craterellus Grifola Tyromyces Bolbitius Clavulinaceae Meripilus Sistotremataceae Conocybe Clavulina Physisporinus Trechispora Hebeloma Hydnaceae Meruliaceae Sparassidaceae Panaeolina Hydnum Climacodon Sparassis Clavariaceae Polyporales Gloeoporus Steccherinaceae Clavaria Albatrellaceae Hyphodermopsis Antrodiella -
(Hypocreales) Proposed for Acceptance Or Rejection
IMA FUNGUS · VOLUME 4 · no 1: 41–51 doi:10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.01.05 Genera in Bionectriaceae, Hypocreaceae, and Nectriaceae (Hypocreales) ARTICLE proposed for acceptance or rejection Amy Y. Rossman1, Keith A. Seifert2, Gary J. Samuels3, Andrew M. Minnis4, Hans-Josef Schroers5, Lorenzo Lombard6, Pedro W. Crous6, Kadri Põldmaa7, Paul F. Cannon8, Richard C. Summerbell9, David M. Geiser10, Wen-ying Zhuang11, Yuuri Hirooka12, Cesar Herrera13, Catalina Salgado-Salazar13, and Priscila Chaverri13 1Systematic Mycology & Microbiology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA; corresponding author e-mail: Amy.Rossman@ ars.usda.gov 2Biodiversity (Mycology), Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada 3321 Hedgehog Mt. Rd., Deering, NH 03244, USA 4Center for Forest Mycology Research, Northern Research Station, USDA-U.S. Forest Service, One Gifford Pincheot Dr., Madison, WI 53726, USA 5Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Hacquetova 17, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 6CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands 7Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences and Natural History Museum, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia 8Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK 9Sporometrics, Inc., 219 Dufferin Street, Suite 20C, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6K 1Y9 10Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, 121 Buckhout Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 USA 11State