DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Review of Shell Canada Energy Responses (Dated October 31, 2013)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Review of Shell Canada Energy Responses (Dated October 31, 2013) Technical Review of Shell Canada Energy Responses (dated October 31, 2013) to Joint Review Panel Supplemental Information Request (dated October 25, 2012) Regarding the Integrated Application for the Pierre River Mine Project PREPARED FOR: Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Industry Relations Corporation PREPARED BY: P.M. (Patt) Larcombe, Symbion Consultants January 16, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 SIR Reference - 6............................................................................................................ 2 SIR Reference - 7............................................................................................................ 4 SIR Reference - 8............................................................................................................ 6 SIR Reference - 34c ........................................................................................................ 9 SIR Reference - 60........................................................................................................ 11 SIR Reference - 63........................................................................................................ 14 SIR Reference - 64........................................................................................................ 14 SIR Reference - 65........................................................................................................ 15 SIR Reference - 68........................................................................................................ 17 SIR Reference - 69a...................................................................................................... 20 SIR Reference - 69b...................................................................................................... 23 SIR Reference - 70........................................................................................................ 25 SIR Reference - 71........................................................................................................ 27 ii ACRONYMS ACFN Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation ACFN IRC Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Industry Relations Corporation CEAR Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry document number on the registry for the Pierre River Mine Project ‘Shell Main Body of Pierre River Mine Project - Responses to the Joint Review Response’ Panel's Supplemental Information Requests (Submitted by Shell Canada Limited to the Joint Review Panel), October 31, 2013. Section 3-Responses to Supplemental Information Requests, contained in CEAR #191. DFO Department of Fisheries and Oceans EC Environment Canada JMEP Shell’s Jackpine Mine Expansion Project JMEP JRP Report of the Joint Review Panel Shell Canada Energy Jackpine Mine Expansion Project Application to Amend Approval 9756 Fort McMurray Area. July 9, 2013. 2013 ABAER 011. CEAA Reference No. 59540. JRP Pierre River Mine Joint Review Panel KIR Key Indicator Resource LSA Local Study Area PAD Peace Athabasca Delta PIC Pre-Industrial Case. As defined in Pierre River Mine Project - Responses to the Joint Review Panel's Supplemental Information Requests (Submitted by Shell Canada Limited to the Joint Review Panel), October 31, 2013. PRM Pierre River Mine TK or TEK Traditional Knowledge or Traditional Ecological Knowledge TLU Traditional Land Use iii RSA Regional Study Area SIR Supplemental Information Request RFMA Registered Fur Management Area RMWB Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo 2013 Application Case As defined in Pierre River Mine Project - Responses to the Joint Review Panel's Supplemental Information Requests (Submitted by Shell Canada Limited to the Joint Review Panel), October 31, 2013. 2013 Base Case As defined in Pierre River Mine Project - Responses to the Joint Review Panel's Supplemental Information Requests (Submitted by Shell Canada Limited to the Joint Review Panel), October 31, 2013. 2013 PDC 2013 Planned Development Case as defined in Pierre River Mine Project - Responses to the Joint Review Panel's Supplemental Information Requests (Submitted by Shell Canada Limited to the Joint Review Panel), October 31, 2013. iv INTRODUCTION Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Industry Relations Corporation (ACFN IRC) retained Patt Larcombe of Symbion Consultants to assist with reviewing Shell Canada Energy’s (Shell) response (dated October 31, 2013, CEAR #191) to the Supplemental Information Request issued by the Joint Review Panel (JRP) established for the Pierre River Mine Project (dated October 25, 2012, CEAR #170). Ms. Larcombe’s review is a component of a broader submission by ACFN IRC pursuant to the November 7, 2013 JRP invitation for comments (CEAR #192). Ms. Larcombe’s review uses the following template for organizational and referencing purposes: Issue ID:1 ___________________________________________ Reviewer: PL_SC SIR Reference:2 _____________ Document Reference(s):3 _______________________________________________ JME Panel Reference4 (if applicable): _____________________________________ Gaps and/or Shortcomings: Request(s): 1 Main and sub-heading subject descriptors in the JRP SIR request dated October 25, 2012 (CEAR 170). 2 JRP’s SIR request number from CEAR 170. 3 Relevant document and page reference(s) of Shell’s October 31, 2013 response to the SIR. 4 Paragraph number for conclusions or guidance deemed relevant by the Reviewer from the Report of the Joint Review Panel Shell Canada Energy Jackpine Mine Expansion Project. Application to Amend Approval 9756 Fort McMurray Area. July 9, 2013. 2013 ABAER 011, CEAA Reference No. 59540. 1 Issue ID: Methods – Significance of Effects Reviewer: PL_SC SIR Reference - 6 Document Reference(s): Shell Main Body of Response, Section 3, pg. 3-26 and Appendix 3.1 JME Panel Reference (if applicable): Gaps and/or Shortcoming: Part (a) of SIR 6 requests Shell provide information about the numerical ranking system and weighting system used to determine environmental significance of project effects. Shell was requested to provide information such as peer reviewed literature or other scientific basis to support the weighting system employed. Part (b) requests substantiation that the methods, including scale, criteria, definitions, and thresholds for significance determination are reasonable. Part (c) requires Shell to provide details of how and where professional judgement is used. The response to SIR 6 (pg. 3-26) introduces a number of assumptions and factors said to be important in considering and determining significance of effects on Aboriginal rights and interests. This discussion lacks reference to peer-reviewed literature and fails to consider a substantial body of legal jurisprudence and information provided by Aboriginal groups, including ACFN, on this matter. In the absence of such reference, it is concluded that the factors discussed on pg. 3-26 are opinion-based. Verification or substantiation of the assumptions and factors described is required to determine if they are reasonable. The JRP’s Terms of Reference require an examination of “any changes to the environment caused by the project on…current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes by Aboriginal persons.” 5 The response to SIR 6 does not address the methods, including scale, criteria, definitions, and thresholds for significance determination employed for assessing project effects and significance of project effects on current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes. Not referenced in the response to SIR 6, is the approach described by Shell in Appendix 3.1 (pgs. 37-39 and 48-49) which appears to have been employed in their cumulative effects assessment on TLU (Appendix 2) and to some extent in their Local Study Area effects assessment described in their response to SIR 65. The factors for determining significance described in Appendix 3.1 (pgs. 37-38 and 48-49) are different than those discussed on pg. 3-26 in the Main Body of Response. Main Body of Response (pg. 3-26) states; “The effects to the exercise of Aboriginal rights and interests may be considered significant if they represent sustained, long-term adverse effects to KIRs that are relied upon, are regularly and preferentially used, and are readily accessible. Furthermore, changes to the 5 Agreement to Establish a Joint Review Panel for the Pierre River Mine Project. Appendix Terms of Reference, pg. 15, section titled “Effects of Changes to the Environment.” June 8, 2012. CEAR #130. 2 ability or desire to exercise particular Aboriginal rights related to the KIRs may contribute to the significance of an effect on Aboriginal rights and interests.” Appendix 3.1 (pgs. 48-49) states; “Generally, significant effects were considered to be high magnitude effects of long duration and affecting the group as a whole. The determination of significance also considered the following: perceptions and values of affected Aboriginal groups; [and] qualitative data and interpretation, and observations of patterns of Aboriginal traditional use of land and resources of a project area.” “Significant: the overall effect is experienced at the Aboriginal group level, and results in substantial changes in the overall patterns of traditional land and resource use.” The criteria discussed in Appendix 3.1 are not supported by professional literature, legal jurisprudence and/or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 2: Baseline, Section 13: Traditional Land Use September 2011 Volume 2: Baseline Studies Frontier Project Section 13: Traditional Land Use
    R1 R24 R23 R22 R21 R20 T113 R19 R18 R17 R16 Devil's Gate 220 R15 R14 R13 R12 R11 R10 R9 R8 R7 R6 R5 R4 R3 R2 R1 ! T112 Fort Chipewyan Allison Bay 219 T111 Dog Head 218 T110 Lake Claire ³ Chipewyan 201A T109 Chipewyan 201B T108 Old Fort 217 Chipewyan 201 T107 Maybelle River T106 Wildland Provincial Wood Buffalo National Park Park Alberta T105 Richardson River Dunes Wildland Athabasca Dunes Saskatchewan Provincial Park Ecological Reserve T104 Chipewyan 201F T103 Chipewyan 201G T102 T101 2888 T100 Marguerite River Wildland Provincial Park T99 1661 850 Birch Mountains T98 Wildland Provincial Namur River Park 174A 33 2215 T97 94 2137 1716 T96 1060 Fort McKay 174C Namur Lake 174B 2457 239 1714 T95 21 400 965 2172 T94 ! Fort McKay 174D 1027 Fort McKay Marguerite River 2006 Wildland Provincial 879 T93 771 Park 772 2718 2926 2214 2925 T92 587 2297 2894 T91 T90 274 Whitemud Falls T89 65 !Fort McMurray Wildland Provincial Park T88 Clearwater 175 Clearwater River T87Traditional Land Provincial Park Fort McKay First Nation Gregoire Lake Provincial Park T86 Registered Fur Grand Rapids Anzac Management Area (RFMA) Wildland Provincial ! Gipsy Lake Wildland Park Provincial Park T85 Traditional Land Use Regional Study Area Gregoire Lake 176, T84 176A & 176B Traditional Land Use Local Study Area T83 ST63 ! Municipality T82 Highway Stony Mountain Township Wildland Provincial T81 Park Watercourse T80 Waterbody Cowper Lake 194A I.R. Janvier 194 T79 Wabasca 166 Provincial Park T78 National Park 0 15 30 45 T77 KILOMETRES 1:1,500,000 UTM Zone 12 NAD 83 T76 Date: 20110815 Author: CES Checked: DC File ID: 123510543-097 (Original page size: 8.5X11) Acknowledgements: Base data: AltaLIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Territories Territoires Du Nord-Ouest British Columbia
    122° 121° 120° 119° 118° 117° 116° 115° 114° 113° 112° 111° 110° 109° n a Northwest Territories i d i Cr r eighton L. T e 126 erritoires du Nord-Oues Th t M urston L. h t n r a i u d o i Bea F tty L. r Hi l l s e on n 60° M 12 6 a r Bistcho Lake e i 12 h Thabach 4 d a Tsu Tue 196G t m a i 126 x r K'I Tue 196D i C Nare 196A e S )*+,-35 125 Charles M s Andre 123 e w Lake 225 e k Jack h Li Deze 196C f k is a Lake h Point 214 t 125 L a f r i L d e s v F Thebathi 196 n i 1 e B 24 l istcho R a l r 2 y e a a Tthe Jere Gh L Lake 2 2 aili 196B h 13 H . 124 1 C Tsu K'Adhe L s t Snake L. t Tue 196F o St.Agnes L. P 1 121 2 Tultue Lake Hokedhe Tue 196E 3 Conibear L. Collin Cornwall L 0 ll Lake 223 2 Lake 224 a 122 1 w n r o C 119 Robertson L. Colin Lake 121 59° 120 30th Mountains r Bas Caribou e e L 118 v ine i 120 R e v Burstall L. a 119 l Mer S 117 ryweather L. 119 Wood A 118 Buffalo Na Wylie L. m tional b e 116 Up P 118 r per Hay R ark of R iver 212 Canada iv e r Meander 117 5 River Amber Rive 1 Peace r 211 1 Point 222 117 M Wentzel L.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 18.0 – Socio-Economic Impact Assessment Table of Contents
    Suncor Energy Inc. Lewis In Situ Project Volume 2 – Environmental Impact Assessment February 2018 SECTION 18.0 – SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 18.0 SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT ...........................................................18 -1 18.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................18 -1 18.2 Study Area ......................................................................................................18 -1 18.2.1 Temporal Boundary ..........................................................................18 -1 18.2.2 Spatial Boundary ..............................................................................18 -1 18.3 Assessment Approach ....................................................................................18 -3 18.3.1 Regulatory Framework .....................................................................18 -3 18.3.2 Socio-economic Issues Identification ................................................18 -3 18.3.3 Valued Socio-Economic Components and Key Indicators ................ 18-3 18.3.4 Assessment Cases ...........................................................................18 -4 18.3.5 Assessment Criteria .........................................................................18 -5 18.3.6 Constraints Planning ........................................................................18 -6 18.4 Methods ..........................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Enter Filename
    MOOSA CROSSOVER PROJECT ESA 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC SETTING This section of the ESA presents a summary description of the existing biophysical and socio-economic environment potentially affected by the Project. Results of field surveys conducted in 2012 and winter 2013 have been included in this ESA report. Vegetation and wildlife reconnaissance surveys were conducted in September 2012, and additional wildlife surveys were conducted in October 2012 and March 2013. Aquatic surveys were conducted in October 2012, and winter fisheries surveys were conducted in February 2013. Methods used to determine baseline conditions for each environmental or socio-economic resource are described in the relevant subsection. The Project is located in northeast Alberta, approximately 35 km northwest of Fort McMurray. The Project footprint is located within the Northern Alberta Lowlands Physiographic Region, and crosses Crown land in the Green Area of Alberta, including two watercourses. 5.1 Study Areas The spatial boundaries or study areas considered in the description of environmental setting and assessment of potential Project effects on the environmental components include one or more of the following: Project footprint, LSA, RSA, and socio-economic study area. These study areas were used to capture the potential direct and indirect effects of the Project on each VC and their associated KI, as well as to understand the context within which the effects can occur. The LSAs and RSAs used in the effects assessment vary by environmental and socio-economic element. The LSAs were established to assess the potential, largely direct effects of the Project on the local environment. Each VC and baseline setting component is considered in defining the LSAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Zone a – Prescribed Northern Zones / Zones Nordiques Visées Par Règlement Place Names Followed by Numbers Are Indian Reserves
    Northern Residents Deductions – Places in Prescribed Zones / Déductions pour les habitants de régions éloignées – Endroits situés dans les zones visées par règlement Zone A – Prescribed northern zones / Zones nordiques visées par règlement Place names followed by numbers are Indian reserves. If you live in a place that is not listed in this publication and you think it is in a prescribed zone, contact us. / Les noms suivis de chiffres sont des réserves indiennes. Communiquez avec nous si l’endroit où vous habitez ne figure pas dans cette publication et que vous croyez qu’il se situe dans une zone visée par règlement. Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories / Yukon, Nunavut et Territoires du Nord-Ouest All places in the Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories are located in a prescribed northern zone. / Tous les endroits situés dans le Yukon, le Nunavut et les Territoires du Nord-Ouest se trouvent dans des zones nordiques visées par règlement. British Columbia / Colombie-Britannique Andy Bailey Recreation Good Hope Lake Nelson Forks Tahltan Liard River 3 Area Gutah New Polaris Mine Taku McDames Creek 2 Atlin Hyland Post Niteal Taku River McDonald Lake 1 Atlin Park Hyland Ranch Old Fort Nelson Tamarack Mosquito Creek 5 Atlin Recreation Area Hyland River Park Pavey Tarahne Park Muddy River 1 Bear Camp Iskut Pennington Telegraph Creek One Mile Point 1 Ben-My-Chree Jacksons Pleasant Camp Tetsa River Park Prophet River 4 Bennett Kahntah Porter Landing Toad River Salmon Creek 3 Boulder City Kledo Creek Park Prophet River Trutch Silver
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta, 2021 Province of Canada
    Quickworld Entity Report Alberta, 2021 Province of Canada Quickworld Factoid Name : Alberta Status : Province of Canada Active : 1 Sept. 1905 - Present Capital : Edmonton Country : Canada Official Languages : English Population : 3,645,257 - Permanent Population (Canada Official Census - 2011) Land Area : 646,500 sq km - 249,800 sq mi Density : 5.6/sq km - 14.6/sq mi Names Name : Alberta ISO 3166-2 : CA-AB FIPS Code : CA01 Administrative Subdivisions Census Divisions (19) Division No. 11 Division No. 12 Division No. 13 Division No. 14 Division No. 15 Division No. 16 Division No. 17 Division No. 18 Division No. 19 Division No. 1 Division No. 2 Division No. 3 Division No. 4 Division No. 5 Division No. 6 Division No. 7 Division No. 8 Division No. 9 Division No. 10 Towns (110) Athabasca Banff Barrhead Bashaw Bassano Beaumont Beaverlodge Bentley Black Diamond Blackfalds Bon Accord Bonnyville Bow Island Bowden Brooks Bruderheim Calmar Canmore Cardston Carstairs Castor Chestermere Claresholm Coaldale Coalhurst Cochrane Coronation Crossfield Crowsnest Pass Daysland Devon Didsbury Drayton Valley Drumheller Eckville Edson Elk Point Fairview Falher © 2019 Quickworld Inc. Page 1 of 3 Quickworld Inc assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this document. The information contained in this document is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness. Quickworld Entity Report Alberta, 2021 Province of Canada Fort MacLeod Fox Creek Gibbons Grande Cache Granum Grimshaw Hanna Hardisty High Level High Prairie High River Hinton Innisfail Killam Lac la Biche Lacombe Lamont Legal Magrath Manning Mayerthorpe McLennan Milk River Millet Morinville Mundare Nanton Okotoks Olds Oyen Peace River Penhold Picture Butte Pincher Creek Ponoka Provost Rainbow Lake Raymond Redcliff Redwater Rimbey Rocky Mountain House Sedgewick Sexsmith Slave Lake Smoky Lake Spirit River St.
    [Show full text]
  • Metis Settlements and First Nations in Alberta Community Profiles
    For additional copies of the Community Profiles, please contact: Indigenous Relations First Nations and Metis Relations 10155 – 102 Street NW Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4G8 Phone: 780-644-4989 Fax: 780-415-9548 Website: www.indigenous.alberta.ca To call toll-free from anywhere in Alberta, dial 310-0000. To request that an organization be added or deleted or to update information, please fill out the Guide Update Form included in the publication and send it to Indigenous Relations. You may also complete and submit this form online. Go to www.indigenous.alberta.ca and look under Resources for the correct link. This publication is also available online as a PDF document at www.indigenous.alberta.ca. The Resources section of the website also provides links to the other Ministry publications. ISBN 978-0-7785-9870-7 PRINT ISBN 978-0-7785-9871-8 WEB ISSN 1925-5195 PRINT ISSN 1925-5209 WEB Introductory Note The Metis Settlements and First Nations in Alberta: Community Profiles provide a general overview of the eight Metis Settlements and 48 First Nations in Alberta. Included is information on population, land base, location and community contacts as well as Quick Facts on Metis Settlements and First Nations. The Community Profiles are compiled and published by the Ministry of Indigenous Relations to enhance awareness and strengthen relationships with Indigenous people and their communities. Readers who are interested in learning more about a specific community are encouraged to contact the community directly for more detailed information. Many communities have websites that provide relevant historical information and other background.
    [Show full text]
  • TREATY 8 FIRST NATIONS of ALBERTA to Protect, Promote, Bring to Life, Implement and Sustain the True Spirit and Intent of Treaty No
    ACFN Advice to Alberta Regarding LARP November 22, 2010 Appendix 1: October 19, 2010 Joint Submission of Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, Chipewyan Prairie Dene First Nation, Mikisew Cree First Nation Regarding Comments on the Lower Athabasca Regional Advisory Council’s Advice to the Government of Alberta Regarding a Vision for the Lower Athabasca Region Appendix 1 Joint Submission of ACFN, CPFN and MCFN on the RAC Vision A1-1 Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Mikisew Cree First Nation Chipewyan Prairie Dene First Nation Industry Relations Corporation Government and Industry Relations Industry Relations Corporation 110B -9816 Hardin Street Suite 208, 9715 Main Street Suite 205, 10020 Franklin Avenue Fort McMurray, AB T9H 4K3 Fort McMurray, AB T9H 1T5 Fort McMurray, AB T9H 2K6 October 19, 2010 Dave Bartesko Land Use Secretariat 9th Floor, 10035‐108 Street Centre West Building Edmonton, AB T5K 2G8 [email protected] Dear Mr. Bartesko: Re: Comments on the Lower Athabasca Regional Advisory Council’s Advice to the Government of Alberta Regarding a Vision for the Lower Athabasca Region (“the RAC Document”) This letter sets out some of the Mikisew Cree First Nation, the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation and the Chipewyan Prairie Dene First NNation’s (“First Nations”) comments on the RAC Document and Cabinet’s powers in respect of the Lower Athabasca Regional Plan (“LARP”). We have also attached an appendix to this letter which provides a chart showing all of the references to “aboriginal peoples” in the RAC Document, the RAC vision for each item, and the problems with the vision. Please note that the First Nations will be providing additional information to the Government of Alberta, including their respective visions for the LARP, on or before November 11, 2010, as per Melody Lepine’s discussion with Dave Bartesko on October 15, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources for Cultural and Subsistence Purposes (E.G., Hunting, Trapping, and Fishing)
    Cenovus TL ULC Telephone Lake Project Volume 2 – Environmental Impact Assessment December 2011 SECTION 17.0 – SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 17.0 SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 17-1 17.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 17-1 17.2 Study Area ........................................................................................................ 17-1 17.2.1 Spatial .............................................................................................. 17-1 17.2.2 Temporal .......................................................................................... 17-3 17.3 Assessment Approach ..................................................................................... 17-3 17.3.1 Issues Identification ......................................................................... 17-3 17.3.2 Scoping Considerations ................................................................... 17-3 17.3.3 Socio-Economic Indicators .............................................................. 17-4 17.4 Methods ............................................................................................................ 17-6 17.4.1 Characterization of Baseline Conditions .......................................... 17-6 17.4.2 Impact Assessment .......................................................................... 17-6 17.5 Baseline Case .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • As Long As the Rivers Flow Athabasca River Knowledge, Use and Change
    As Long as the Rivers Flow Athabasca River Knowledge, Use and Change by Craig Candler, Rachel Olson, Steven DeRoy and the Firelight Group Research Cooperative with the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN) and the Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN) November 26, 2010 As Long As The Rivers Flow: Athabasca River Knowledge, Use and Change November 26, 2010 Download the full report at parklandinstitute.ca or thefirelightgroup.com By Craig Candler, Rachel Olson, Steven DeRoy and the Firelight Group Research Cooperative, with the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN) and the Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN) Published by the Parkland Institute, University of Alberta Text and figures prepared by Craig Candler (Ph.D.) and Rachel Olson (Ph.D. candidate) of the Firelight Group Maps prepared by Steven DeRoy (GIS Specialist), the Firelight Group Internal Peer Review by Ginger Gibson (Ph.D.), the Firelight Group. External peer review by David Schindler (Professor, University of Alberta) and Peter Usher (Member, Joint Panel Review for the Mackenzie Gas Project). Any errors are the authors’ alone. ISBN 978-1-894949-30-9 Disclaimer The information contained in this report is Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation P.O. Box 366, Fort Chipewyan, AB, T0P 1B0 based on limited research conducted as part t: 1.780.697.3730 | toll free: 1.888.420.7011 of the Athabasca River Use and Traditional e: [email protected] www.acfn.com Ecological Knowledge Study. It reflects the understanding of the authors, and is not a complete depiction of the dynamic and living Mikisew Cree First Nation system of use and knowledge maintained by P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Metis Settlements and First Nations in Alberta : Community Profiles
    For additional copies of the Community Profiles, please contact: Indigenous Relations First Nations and Metis Relations 10155 – 102 Street NW Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4G8 Phone: 780-644-4989 Fax: 780-415-9548 Website: www.indigenous.alberta.ca To call toll-free from anywhere in Alberta, dial 310-0000. To request that an organization be added or deleted or to update information, please fill out the Guide Update Form included in the publication and send it to Indigenous Relations. You may also complete and submit this form online. Go to www.indigenous.alberta.ca and look under Resources for the correct link. This publication is also available online as a PDF document at www.indigenous.alberta.ca. The Resources section of the website also provides links to the other Ministry publications. Introductory Note The Metis Settlements and First Nations in Alberta: Community Profiles provide a general overview of the eight Metis Settlements and 48 First Nations in Alberta. Included is information on population, land base, location and community contacts as well as Quick Facts on Metis Settlements and First Nations. The Community Profiles are compiled and published by the Ministry of Indigenous Relations to enhance awareness and strengthen relationships with Indigenous people and their communities. Readers who are interested in learning more about a specific community are encouraged to contact the community directly for more detailed information. Many communities have websites that provide relevant historical information and other background. Where available, these website addresses are included in the profiles. PLEASE NOTE The information contained in the Profiles is accurate at the time of publishing.
    [Show full text]
  • NADC Area Profile: an Economic Description of the Region
    NADC Area Profile: An Economic Description of the Region May 2016 Prepared by Northern Alberta Development Council (NADC) 206 Provincial Building, Bag 900-14 Peace River, AB T8S 1T4 www.nadc.ca Edmonton | Fort McMurray | Bonnyville | Peace River EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 REGION 4 POPULATION (2011 CENSUS) 8 LABOUR FORCE (2011 NHS) 14 LOCAL ECONOMY 18 INDUSTRY MIX 18 ENERGY AND MINERALS 19 AGRICULTURE, 2011 CENSUS 21 FORESTRY PRODUCTS 24 TOURISM 27 DEVELOPMENT POLICIES 28 DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 31 REFERENCE 33 APPENDIX 1 – MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES AND THEIR COMMUNITIES 36 APPENDIX 2 – RESERVES/SETTLEMENTS/VILLAGES AND FIRST NATIONS 38 APPENDIX 3 – ELECTORAL AREA, ALBERTA 40 FEDERAL ELECTORAL DISTRICT (NADC REGION) 40 PROVINCIAL ELECTORAL DIVISIONS (NADC REGION) 40 APPENDIX 4 – GEOGRAPHICAL UNITS (SGC 2011) 41 CD 12 (COLD LAKE CA) 41 CD 13 41 CD 16 (WOOD BUFFALO CA) 41 CD 17 41 CD 18 42 CD 19 (GRANDE PRAIRIE CA) 42 APPENDIX 5 – LABOUR, 2011 NHS 43 APPENDIX 6 – 2011 CENSUS AGRICULTURAL REGIONS 45 Northern Development is an opportunity and a challenge to build a prosperous, entrepreneurial, and diversified economy for our northern urban, rural, and remote residents. Executive Summary Profiling a local economy is one of the key economic analysis tools for economic development planning. An area profile provides a fundamental description of a region’s economy – its system or range of activities related to the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services – which serves as a basis or starting point for other regional economic analyses. An area profile may inform investors and entrepreneurs to consider business opportunities in the region, attract visitors, and brief the citizenry and governments on the structure, state, developments, and outlook of the local economy.
    [Show full text]