DOCSLIB.ORG

Digital Transparency Task Force Report and Recommendations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION DIGITAL TRANSPARENCY TASK FORCE 2021 INTRODUCTION FROM THE CHAIR In the fall of 2019, the California Fair Political Practices Commission authorized the creation of a task force to examine issues surrounding the ever-growing and ever-changing nature and practice of digital political advertising. Abundant documentation shows what was once a novelty is now not only a widespread and common practice, but a continually growing norm of political communication. The rise in this practice of digital political discourse raises questions regarding the adequacy of the current transparency of the sources of these communications. A common and constant refrain from many in the political world is the law generally does not keep up with reality in the realm of political practices. The creation of the FPPC’s Digital Transparency Task Force (“DTTF”) was designed to bridge that gap – to gather information and bring together ideas to help create and modify regulations and laws to align them with the reality of the breadth and sophistication of digital political advertising. In compiling the makeup of the DTTF, the Commission was mindful of the scope of voices involved and the need for all to be heard. Thus, the DTTF specifically sought and embraced a wide variety of viewpoints. Members include representation from the digital platforms themselves, political scientists and academics who study the phenomenon and its effects on our political landscape, the very political practitioners currently using digital technology in their advertising and outreach, as well as groups devoted to transparency and general ‘good government’ practices. Along with the varied makeup of the DTTF itself, the subsequent public meetings included an even wider variety of voices, providing information, answering questions, offering examples of regulation and practices in a variety of other state and local jurisdictions, as well as providing advice and potential solutions to vexing questions posed by the DTTF. The following report provides not only the ideas recommended by the DTTF but also the rationale and justification for the proposals. The DTTF worked diligently to find ideas and solutions that not only provide more transparency for the public and accountability of the political practitioners, but to also avoid additional barriers or overly burdensome requirements on those facing any new laws or regulations. The global pandemic delayed but did not stop the DTTF from completing its task. On behalf of the Commission, I want to thank all members of the DTTF for their time, effort and engagement in formulating these recommendations, as well as the persons and groups who provided testimony and information to the DTTF. The Commission would also like to thank the numerous FPPC staff who helped guide and support the DTTF in its work. Fair Political Practices Commission Digital Transparency Task Force – Report and Recommendations 2 | Page The DTTF respectfully submits this report for consideration by the Commission, and ultimately, the Legislature and the Governor, with the belief that the recommendations contained herein should be implemented to improve transparency in digital political advertising. Richard C. Miadich Chair, California Fair Political Practices Commission Fair Political Practices Commission Digital Transparency Task Force – Report and Recommendations 3 | Page COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP Richard C. Miadich, Chair, Fair Political Practices Commission Brian Brokaw, Principal, Brian Brokaw Consulting LLC Rena Davis, Government Affairs and Public Policy, Google Thad Kousser, Department Chair, Professor of Political Science, UC San Diego Amber Maltbie, Partner, Nossaman LLP Jennifer Waggoner, Volunteer, League of Women Voters of California, voting member Abby Wood, Professor of Law, Political Science and Public Policy, University of Southern California, Commissioner, Fair Political Practices Commission Katie Zoglin, Volunteer, League of Women Voters of California, non-voting member Fair Political Practices Commission Digital Transparency Task Force – Report and Recommendations 4 | Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Allison Hayward, FPPC Commissioner, Task Force Member until August 2020 James Schwab, Chief Deputy Secretary of State, Task Force Member until January 2021 Gale Kaufman, President, Kaufman Campaign Consultants, Task Force Member until April 2021 Speakers - Russell Lehman, Commissioner, Washington Public Disclosure Commission Fred Jarrett, Commissioner Washington Public Disclosure Commission Sean Flynn, General Counsel, Washington Public Disclosure Commission Kim Bradford, Communications, Washington Public Disclosure Commission Brendan Fischer, Campaign Legal Center Tyler Joseph, Director of Policy, City of Los Angeles Ethics Commission Timothy Grant, IT Director, City of Los Angeles Ethics Commission Matthew Sollars, Director of Public Relations, New York City Campaign Finance Board Libby Hall, Vice President of Client Services, Unearth Campaigns Mona Pasquil Rogers, California Public Policy, Facebook Cristina Flores, U.S. Politics & Government Outreach, Facebook Sarah Schiff, Product Manager, Facebook Trent Lange, President, California Clean Money Campaign Alea Mitchell, Associate Product Counsel, Google Angelika Dorvel, Manager, Government Affairs & Public Policy, Google Ronald M. Jacobs, Chair, Political Law Practice, Venable LLP Michael A. Signorelli, Partner, Venable LLP Jared DeMarinis, Director, Candidacy & Campaign Finance Division, Maryland State Board of Elections Whitney Quesenbery, Executive Director, Center for Civic Design Fair Political Practices Commission Digital Transparency Task Force – Report and Recommendations 5 | Page Fair Political Practices Commission Staff - Galena West, Executive Director Erika Boyd, Senior Commission Counsel Sasha Linker, Commission Assistant Jay Wierenga, Communications Director Lindsey Nakano, Legislative Counsel Katelyn Greene, Commission Counsel Loressa Hon, Chief of Administration Larry Crabtree, Chief Information Officer Jesse Hidalgo, Information Technology Specialist Sukhi Brar, Assistant General Counsel Christopher Burton, Assistant Chief of Enforcement Megan Van Arsdale, Commission Counsel Paul Rasey, Special Investigator Fair Political Practices Commission Digital Transparency Task Force – Report and Recommendations 6 | Page TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION FROM THE CHAIR .............................................................................................. 2 COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP ....................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................... 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS....................................................................................................................... 7 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 9 2. RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................... 15 Recommendation 1. Creation of a state-run archive for digital political advertisements. ...... 15 Recommendation 2. Contents of the Archive. .......................................................................... 16 Recommendation 3. Request Digital Disclosure Research ....................................................... 20 3. WORK OF THE DTTF .................................................................................................................. 22 Presentations made to the DTTF............................................................................................... 22 Fair Political Practices Commission Staff ............................................................................... 22 Washington State Public Disclosure Commission ................................................................. 22 Campaign Legal Center .......................................................................................................... 23 City of Los Angeles ................................................................................................................. 23 James Schwab presentation on SB 1104 ............................................................................... 24 New York City Ad Archive ...................................................................................................... 24 Unearth Campaigns ............................................................................................................... 25 Google .................................................................................................................................... 25 Facebook ................................................................................................................................ 26 California Clean Money Campaign ........................................................................................ 26 Venable LLP ............................................................................................................................ 27 Maryland State Board of Elections ........................................................................................ 28 Center for Civic Design .......................................................................................................... 28 Fair Political Practices Commission Digital Transparency Task Force – Report and Recommendations 7 | Page
Recommended publications
  • Pro Bono at Venable

    Pro Bono at Venable

    Venable Cares SPRING 2007 Those Who Can, “One has only to agree Should. to represent a pro bono Amy J. McMaster client to realize that the While interning with the Legal Aid Society my fi rst summer rewards are plentiful; after law school, I gained a new appreciation for attorneys one might even say, who choose a life of public service. Thinly staffed, the two addictive.” attorneys I supported managed more cases between them over the course of that summer than many do in a lifetime. it, in fact. For a variety of reasons, such cases often Although a career in public service may arrive at an attorney’s doorstep like an impetuous not be for everyone, I am always surprised at orphan - demanding and in need of immediate how some attorneys are willing to perform CONTENTS 1 attention - affording their new caregiver precious hundreds of hours of pro bono work each little time to get up to speed on the facts of the year, while others would not think twice about case before jumping in with both feet. But jump 1 Those Who Can, Should. checking the “seldom to never” category in an they must. Pro bono clients typically seek attorney survey. It certainly doesn’t seem to representation only in the midst of an active 2 Letter from the have anything to do with how busy they are. confl ict involving emotionally-wrought issues, Like so many things, if you need an attorney to Pro Bono Chair such as: shelter, livelihood, welfare or medical handle a pro bono case, ask one who’s busy.
  • Money in Politics

    Money in Politics

    CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY 1 FALL 2020 ISSUE 2020 - 003 CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY HARVARD KENNEDY SCHOOL Money in Politics Reimagining Rights & Responsibilities in the U.S. 2 CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY Reimagining Rights & Responsibilities in the United States: Voting Rights Carr Center for Human Rights Policy Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University November 18, 2020 John Shattuck Carr Center Senior Fellow; Former US Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor; Professor of Practice, Fletcher School, Tufts University Mathias Risse Lucius N. Littauer Professor of Philosophy and Public Administration; Director for the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy The authors’ institutional affiliations are provided for purposes of author identification, not as indications of institutional endorsement of the report. This report is part of a Carr Center project on Reimagining Rights and Responsibilities in the United States, directed by John Shattuck. The project has been overseen by a faculty committee chaired by Mathias Risse, with the collaboration of Executive Director Sushma Raman, and the support of the Carr Center staff. This research paper was drafted by Kate Williams (RA). The authors are grateful to Michael Blanding and Mayumi Cornejo for editing, and Alexandra Geller for editorial and design. CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY 1 Table of Contents 2. Introduction 3. Early Efforts to Regulate Campaign Finance 5. Campaign Finance, Freedom of Speech, and the Rise of Soft Money 6. Enhanced Disclosure and Transparency 7. Challenges to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act 9. Citizens United and Subsequent Rulings 10. Money in Politics Today: Undermining the Democratic Process 12.
  • *Chart Based on Responses Received for 2020 1L Summer Placement Data

    *Chart Based on Responses Received for 2020 1L Summer Placement Data

    *Chart based on responses received for 2020 1L summer placement data. Of 708 students in the Class of 2022, 418 (59%) responses were received. Government (Federal/State/Local) California Dept. of Justice, Consumer Law Section (San Diego, CA) Council of the DC, Judiciary and Public Safety Committee (Washington, DC) Criminal Justice Coordinating Council - CJCC (Washington, DC) DC Dept. of Health (Washington, DC) DC Dept. of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (DCRA) (Washington, DC) DC Public Schools, Office of General Counsel (Washington, DC) Environmental Defense Fund (Boulder, CO) Federal Aviation Administration - FAA, Office of the Chief Counsel, Airports & Environmental Law Branch (Washington, DC) Federal Circuit Bar Association (Washington, DC) Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Washington, DC) Federal Communications Commission (Washington, DC) Federal Communications Commission, Media Bureau (Washington, DC) Federal Communications Commission, Office of Legislative Affairs (Washington, DC) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission - FERC (Washington, DC) Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) (Washington, DC) Federal Reserve Bank of New York (New York, NY) Federal Reserve Board, Office of the Inspector General (Washington, DC) Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (Washington, DC) Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Bureau of Competition (Washington, DC) Government Accountability Project (Washington, DC) Government of the DC; Dept. of Housing and Community Development (Washington, DC) Governor's Office of General Counsel (Harrisburg, PA) National Labor Relations Board, Office of General Counsel (Washington, DC) National Labor Relations Board, Region 9 (Cincinnati, OH) New York City Law Dept. (New York, NY) NYC Law Dept. (New York, NY) Office of Police Accountability (Seattle, WA) Office of Special Counsel (Washington, DC) Office of the Tenant Advocate (Washington, DC) U.S.
  • Most Influential Minority Lawyers in Los Angeles

    Most Influential Minority Lawyers in Los Angeles

    CUSTOM CONTENT JANUARY 28, 2019 MOST INFLUENTIAL Minority Attorneys IN LOS ANGELES 087-103_MinoritySupp.indd 87 1/23/19 12:18 PM 88 LOS ANGELES BUSINESS JOURNAL – CUSTOM CONTENT JANUARY 28, 2019 MOST INFLUENTIAL MINORITY ATTORNEYS NEERAJ ARORA TERRY B. BATES SABRINA A. BELDNER WILLIAM J. BRIGGS, II Partner Partner Partner Partner Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Reed Smith LLP McGuireWoods LLP Venable LLP eeraj Arora’s work also involves erry Bates is a litigation partner with cGuireWoods partner Sabrina Beldner’s illiam J. Briggs, II, a partner with representing clients such as Prudential Reed Smith’s Los Angeles’ office and has clients refer to her as their “Swiss Army Venable LLP in Los Angeles, is NCapital Group, in connection with a $100 Tsubstantial first chair trial experience MKnife” for employment matters. She is Wrecognized as a leading trial lawyer million private placement to a wholly owned for both plaintiffs and defendants. He is a a go-to attorney in high-stakes employment and civil litigator, with extensive experience subsidiary of a global developer of solar energy member of Reed Smith’s Complex Litigation discrimination, wage and hour litigation in the entertainment industry. He provides resources for construction debt used to finance Group where he serves as Deputy Practice and traditional labor matters. Beldner also counsel to some of the most recognizable a new 75 MW solar photovoltaic generating Group Leader. He is also a member of Reed represents the next generation of leadership names in the film, television, music, and facility located in North Carolina. He worked Smith’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee’s within McGuireWoods.
  • H.R. 1 / S. 1 Disclosure Provisions: How the for the People Act Would Fix American Democracy's Dark Money Problem Campaign Legal Center March 2021 Introduction

    H.R. 1 / S. 1 Disclosure Provisions: How the for the People Act Would Fix American Democracy's Dark Money Problem Campaign Legal Center March 2021 Introduction

    H.R. 1 / S. 1 Disclosure Provisions: How the For the People Act Would Fix American Democracy's Dark Money Problem Campaign Legal Center March 2021 Introduction In the 2020 election alone, more than $1 billion was spent by so-called “dark money” entities that kept their donors hidden from the public.1 The fifteen highest-spending dark money groups accounted for nearly $645 million of that total.2 Because these dark money groups do not publicly disclose their donors, voters cannot know what those secret donors might be getting in return from elected officials. As described in this report, the solution is H.R. 1 / S. 1, the For the People Act, which shines a spotlight on dark money, and which is carefully crafted to address the real- world practices that wealthy special interests have used to keep their political donations hidden from the public. First, H.R. 1 / S. 1 makes clear what political spending is subject to disclosure. In 2020, major dark money groups, both Democrat and Republican, spent tens of millions of dollars on TV and digital ads that were carefully worded or timed to evade existing law. The bill addresses these practices by requiring disclosure when a group spends over $10,000 on ads that promote, support, attack, or oppose a candidate’s election. Second, the bill clarifies who must be disclosed when that spending is reported. Wealthy donors have anonymously poured hundreds of millions of dollars into elections by claiming none of their donations were “earmarked” for a particular ad, or by passing money through an intermediary.
  • The Download DEVELOPMENTS in E-COMMERCE, PRIVACY, INTERNET ADVERTISING, MARKETING and INFORMATION SERVICES LAW and POLICY

    The Download DEVELOPMENTS in E-COMMERCE, PRIVACY, INTERNET ADVERTISING, MARKETING and INFORMATION SERVICES LAW and POLICY

    the download DEVELOPMENTS IN E-COMMERCE, PRIVACY, INTERNET ADVERTISING, MARKETING AND INFORMATION SERVICES LAW AND POLICY Winner of Chambers USA "Award of Excellence" for the top FEBRUARY 2011 privacy practice in the United States ……………………………. Special Report: California Supreme Court Winner of Chambers USA "Award of Excellence" for the top Announces State Law Prohibits Marketing advertising practice in United States Requests for ZIP Codes ……………………………. Two of the "Top 25 Privacy Experts" by Computerworld In a case with major implications for retailers and marketers, the Supreme ……………………………. Court of California ruled on February 10, 2011 that state law prohibits "Winning particular plaudits" for businesses from requesting and recording ZIP codes from consumers "sophisticated enforcement work" prior to credit card transactions, including requests for use in marketing. – Chambers and Partners Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., S178241 (Cal., Feb. 10, 2011). ……………………………. Numerous other states have laws similar to California’s that regulate Recognized in the Legal 500 as a merchant practices with respect to collecting and recording personal top law firm for its outstanding information in connection with a credit card purchase. data protection and privacy practice The impact of the Court’s decision is not limited to future practices. The Court also held that its interpretation of the statute applies retroactively, ISSUE EDITORS thereby opening the door to class action consumer lawsuits based on businesses’ prior requests for ZIP codes for marketing purposes. Within days of the Court’s ruling, over a dozen cases have already been filed in California against major retailers. Courts can impose statutory damages of up to $1000 per violation of the law.
  • 1 Money, Politics, and the Crippling of the FEC: a Symposium on the Federal Election Commission's Arguable Inability to Effectiv

    1 Money, Politics, and the Crippling of the FEC: a Symposium on the Federal Election Commission's Arguable Inability to Effectiv

    Money, Politics, and the Crippling of the FEC: A symposium on the Federal Election Commission's arguable inability to effectively regulate money in American elections. Trevor Potter1 Thank you, Professor Popper, for that kind introduction. And thank you Michael Cabrera, Ross Handler, and your colleagues at the Washington College of Law at American University and the Administrative Law Review for organizing this timely and important symposium. I say timely because we currently have a malfunctioning FEC, with one vacant commissionership and five commissioners whose terms have expired, all at the start of a new presidency, so this is an ideal time to step back and look at the FEC and talk about how to enable it to function again. I say important because the FEC was perhaps the keystone of the Watergate reforms, and it retains a central place in our federal campaign finance system. It has the potential to faithfully and fairly enforce the campaign finance laws, bringing certainty to the field. So long as the FEC exists, but fails in these roles, it leaves a vacuum or a black hole (in the physics use of that phrase) at the heart of our system. It “preempts” and “occupies” enough of the field in a legal sense that others—the courts, the Department of Justice, other agencies—cannot step in and do the job the FEC is not doing. So its ability to function successfully is important to our campaign finance system—we effectively have no laws if the FEC is not enforcing them. As an FEC Commissioner between 1991 and 1995, I speak from personal experience in saying that it is not true that the FEC is “unable” to regulate money in elections.
  • 25-Page Complaint

    25-Page Complaint

    BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER 1411 K Street NW, Suite 1400 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 736-2200 SANDHYA BATHIJA 1411 K Street NW, Suite 1400 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 736-2200 v. MUR No. ________ NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND Mary Rose Adkins, Treasurer 11250 Waples Mill Road Fairfax, VA 22030 NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION Mary Rose Adkins, Treasurer 11250 Waples Mill Road Fairfax, VA 22030 COMPLAINT 1. This complaint is filed pursuant to 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(1) and is based on information and belief that the National Rifle Association of America Political Victory Fund (“NRA-PVF”) (ID: C00053553) and the National Rifle Association of America Institute for Legislative Action (“NRA-ILA”) (ID: C90013301) have violated the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA”), 52 U.S.C. § 30101, et seq. 2. During the 2010 and 2012 election cycles, both the NRA-PVF and the NRA-ILA contracted with a political consulting firm called OnMessage, Inc. (“OnMessage”). In 2013, OnMessage officials formed an additional political consulting firm, Starboard Strategic, Inc. (“Starboard”). Beginning in the 2014 election cycle, both the NRA-PVF and the NRA-ILA stopped contracting with OnMessage, and began contracting with Starboard for independent expenditures supporting senatorial candidates—Thom Tillis, Tom Cotton, and Cory Gardner—whose campaign committees were simultaneously paying OnMessage. In the 2016 cycle, both the NRA-PVF and the NRA-ILA paid Starboard for independent expenditures supporting Ron Johnson, whose authorized campaign committee was simultaneously paying OnMessage. In reports to the Commission, the NRA-ILA and NRA-PVF consistently listed Starboard’s address as that of OnMessage and the NRA-ILA and NRA-PVF are effectively Starboard’s only clients.
  • The Connection Alumni Newsletter I Spring 2014

    The Connection Alumni Newsletter I Spring 2014

    the connection Alumni Newsletter I Spring 2014 IN THIS ISSUE Alumni Event 1 Alumni Event Recap We Are Pleased to Announce “An Evening with Jeffrey Toobin” 2-3 Event Photos A high-profile senior analyst for CNN and staff writer for The 4 Firm Report New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin is one of the country’s most respected experts on politics, media and the law. The author of critically 5 Awards and Recognition acclaimed best sellers, Mr. Toobin delved into the historical, political and personal inner workings of the Supreme Court and Connecting in Our its justices in his book The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court. The 6 Communities Nine spent more than four months on the New York Times Best Seller list and was named one of the best books of the year by Time, Newsweek, Entertainment Weekly 7 Events of Interest and the Economist. His newest book, The Oath, a sequel to The Nine, is a gripping insider’s account of the momentous ideological war between the John Roberts 7 California Update Supreme Court and the Obama administration. At the podium, Mr. Toobin is an unbiased, deeply analytic (and often very funny) expert on all matters of American law, politics and media. He provides a unique look into the inner workings of The Supreme Court and its influence, as well as how upcoming elections will shape the court and, in turn, the nation. His relaxed style, sense of humor and unprejudiced, forthright analysis make for a fascinating presentation. Please mark your calendar. Wednesday, June 25 Thursday, June 26 Venable’s Washington office Venable’s Baltimore office VENABLE SNAPSHOT 6:30 p.m.
  • Venable Names Douglas C. Emhoff Managing Director, West Coast and Mitchell Evall Partner-In-Charge of Its Los Angeles Office | Abo…

    Venable Names Douglas C. Emhoff Managing Director, West Coast and Mitchell Evall Partner-In-Charge of Its Los Angeles Office | Abo…

    11/21/2020 Venable Names Douglas C. Emhoff Managing Director, West Coast and Mitchell Evall Partner-in-Charge of its Los Angeles Office | Abo… [ Press Release. (Aug. 13, 2015). Venable Names Douglas C. Emhoff Managing Director, West Coast and Mitchell Evall Partner-in-Charge of its Los Angeles Office. Venable LLP. Reproduced for educational purposes only. Fair Use relied upon. ] Venable Names Douglas C. Emhoff Managing Director, West Coast and Mitchell Evall Partner-in- Charge of its Los Angeles Office Douglas C. Emhoff, Mitchell Evall, James E. Nelson and James L, Shea Los Angeles, CA - August 13, 2015 - Venable LLP announced this morning that Douglas C. Emhoff, former Partner-in-Charge of its Los Angeles ofce, has been named Managing Director, West Coast with oversight over the rm's current ofces in Los Angeles and San Francisco. Mitch Evall has assumed the position of Partner- in-Charge of the Los Angeles ofce. Jim Nelson will remain as Partner-in-Charge of the rm's growing San Francisco ofce. In a memo to the rm, Chairman James L. Shea noted that Mr. Emhoff joined the rm in 2006 as one of the founding Los Angeles ofce partners, and has served as Partner-in-Charge of that ofce for the past eight years while continuing to build his business and entertainment litigation practice. During that time, the ofce has experienced signicant growth and is now nearly 70 attorneys in litigation, entertainment, labor and employment, corporate, real estate, intellectual property, bankruptcy, tax and estate planning. Doug also helped found the San Francisco ofce in 2013, and will continue to serve clients from both California ofces.
  • An Evening with LSC Thursday, May 11, 2017

    An Evening with LSC Thursday, May 11, 2017

    Home, Stability, Family, Respect, Equity, Safety, Community, Generosity, Hope, Opportunity, Justice, Advocacy, Leadership An Evening With LSC Thursday, May 11, 2017 Featuring Guest Speaker Steve Phillips Founder of Democracy in Color, national political leader, civil rights lawyer and author of the New York Times bestselling Brown is the New White Pro Bono Leadership Award Honorees Benjamin Craven, Jones Day Tala Hartsough, Attorney at Law Asa M. Wynn-Grant, DLA Piper Cy Pres Award Honoree Adam Belsky, Gross Belsky Alonso LLP Home, Stability, Family, Respect, Equity, Safety, Community, Generosity, Hope, Opportunity, Justice, Advocacy, Leadership Home, Stability, Family, Respect, Equity, Safety, Community, Generosity, Hope, Opportunity, Justice, Advocacy, Leadership EVENT COMMITTEE Puppet Mills Mark Chavez Ann Alpers, Co-Chair Directly, Inc. Chavez & Gertler LLP S.H. Cowell Foundation Laura Ruettgers Lily Colby Carol Morganstern, Co-Chair Severson & Werson National Center for Youth Law Major, Lindsey & Africa Suzanne Stuckwisch Donna Wickham Furth Susan Tunnell, Co-Chair Alvarez & Marsal Disputes Attorney at Law Attorney at Law and Investigations, LLC Mikiko Huang Darren Teshima California Pacific Medical Center Simona Agnolucci Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Scott Karchmer Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP Kim Thompson Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP Mark Chavez PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Sharon Meadows Chavez & Gertler LLP Christopher Zand USF School of Law Arthur Cirulnick Brouwer & Janachowski, LLC Puppet Mills Venable LLP Directly, Inc. Nell Clement BOARD OF DIRECTORS John O’Toole Farella Braun + Martel LLP Ann Alpers, Chair Attorney at Law Ashley Vinson Crawford S.H. Cowell Foundation James Schurz Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Kim Thompson, Vice Chair Morrison & Foerster LLP Erin E. Dolly PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Janet Sherwood Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP Suzanne Stuckwisch, Treasurer Advokids Sarah K.
  • Supreme Court of the United States ------ ------AMERICAN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP, INC., Et Al., Petitioners, V

    Supreme Court of the United States ------ ------AMERICAN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP, INC., Et Al., Petitioners, V

    No. 11-1179 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- AMERICAN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. STEVE BULLOCK, Attorney General of Montana, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court Of The State Of Montana --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF AARP, CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER, CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS, CHICAGO LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, COMMON CAUSE, ILLINOIS CAMPAIGN FOR POLITICAL REFORM, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES, MICHIGAN CAMPAIGN FINANCE NETWORK, NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MONEY IN STATE POLITICS, PROGRESSIVES UNITED, SUNLIGHT FOUNDATION, U.S. PIRG EDUCATION FUND AND WISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS --------------------------------- --------------------------------- JUDD B. GROSSMAN J. GERALD HEBERT STANLEY M. GROSSMAN PAUL S. RYAN* SHAHEEN RUSHD TARA MALLOY GROSSMAN LLP MEGAN MCALLEN 590 Madison Avenue THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER 18th Floor 215 E Street, NE New York, NY 10022 Washington, DC 20002 (646) 770-7445 (202) 736-2200 [email protected] *Counsel of Record ================================================================ COCKLE LAW BRIEF PRINTING CO. (800) 225-6964 OR CALL COLLECT (402) 342-2831 i TABLE