DOCSLIB.ORG

Scranton Throop W 11 58 Jefferson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scranton Throop W 11 58 Jefferson MPMS# PROJECT: I-81 Detector System - Pittston to Clarks Summit 4 COUNTY: Lackawanna CATEGORY: ITS MUNICIPALITY: FUNCTIONAL CLASS: 11 S.R.: 0081 Segment: 1860 NHS: Yes DESCRIPTION: I-81 Pittston to Clarks Summit - Detector system at each interchange (2 detectors each direction = 4 X $30K each x 15 exits) PROJECT NEED: TRAFFIC FACILITY ENVIRONMENT COMMUNITY PROJECT PRIORITY Criteria 1: 3 AADT: 81716 Bridges Affected: 14 Wetland: Yes Comp Plan Zone: MDIA Criteria 2: 2 AATT: 15116 SD Bridge Present? N Streams: No Transit: Yes Criteria 3: 2 Truck %: 19 Min Sufficiency Rating: 51.8 Flood Plain: Yes EJ Pop: Yes Criteria 4: 2 2009 V/C: 0.93 Max Detour Length (miles): 99 Historic: Yes TUP Pop: Yes Criteria 5: 3 2030 V/C: 1.97 Min. IRI: 1 Section 4F: Yes Criteria 6: 2 524 TOTAL: 14 Crash DELTA: 0.59 Signals Affected: QR 0 Note: RANK: 54 ESTIMATED 2011-2014 2015-2016632 2017-2018 QR6322019-2022 2023-2030 TOTAL TIP QR DATES $0.00 $0.00 $3,800,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,800,000.00 Let: QR347 6 £11 ¤ 247QR 6 FUNDING SUMMARY ¤£ i Completion: r v e R 307 46 8006 aw na QR CLARKS N ck an SCOTT La ARCHBALD 307 SUMMIT O BLAKELY UV T D Y R A A H D L IELD 14 43 S Y NE RF 6 º L A A F G AV LOCATION ¤£ 34 R D O 62958 DICKSON 47 R T JESSUP ASSET MGMT E CITY S 57487 S N NEWTOND T I R ACRE A BRIDGE NEWT 200 M O L N 32 247 CMAQ B RD D 13 HILL 7912 L 80797 UV M M L R e E g CONNECTOR C O R g S k OLYPHANT U ert C ree H N A ENHANCEMENT URCH MILWA 8212 A HILL UK L D E M H R R ARS OO 247 SAFETY D E - 476 W QR R N R D TRANSIT O D ¨¦§ T SCRANTON THROOP W 11 58 JEFFERSON E £ 69535 N ¤ S 33 P P 8394 u C 8322 M RE 7939 A D 348 s E 8204 K K R R q QR N N 8252 R I DUNMORE u 207 TA 53 36 Bro UN V ng ok e D O 61 i M A r h 7764 a 84 R R 54 o a L D 435 A R B 476 E 65682 QR ¨¦§ n 8181 ¨¦§ S 35 8 RANSOM D Y 83027 n E 41 AN R K O 84 81 a D A R SOM K ¨¦§ R S R TAYLOR T 8202 iver 7838 S 50879 8244 IB 81 ROARING 24 L 8400 E DAV 11 § 68759 Y Y ¨¦ 85467 92 IS ¤£ BROOK 84 UV A S ¨¦§ 590 V T 7913 P QR OLD M D 590 EXETER A R UV R FORGE A ER C 11 SHUTT O 39 ¤£ BLU E 92 MOOSIC 307 RD X R 83938 435 QR 7792 RAM 40 8007 UV T P D DURYEA 380 UV o D O § er RF ¨¦ MADISON N N a Riv 307 216 n Y QR 0 n 5,000 84330 a OR w E K 87 380 a ST T A k IN O V Feet § c A ¨¦ 690 EXETER a M O V MOSCOW QR L F A 141 SPRINGBROOK 03616 MT HB 8 27, 20098:52:25 AM 8183 R g B o prin rook Page of 35037 a S r in g B r o o k PITTSTON QR690 QR502 QR435 MPMS# PROJECT: I-81 ITS Camera - Exit 194 5 COUNTY: Lackawanna CATEGORY: ITS MUNICIPALITY: South Abington FUNCTIONAL CLASS: 11 S.R.: 0081 Segment: 1941 NHS: Yes DESCRIPTION: I-81 Clarks Summit, Exit 194 - Install ITS camera PROJECT NEED: TRAFFIC FACILITY ENVIRONMENT COMMUNITY PROJECT PRIORITY Criteria 1: 3 AADT: 15396 Bridges Affected: 0 Wetland: Yes Comp Plan Zone: LDIA Criteria 2: 3 AATT: 3080 SD Bridge Present? Y Streams: No Transit: No Criteria 3: 2 Truck %: 20 Min Sufficiency Rating: 0 Flood Plain: Yes EJ Pop: No Criteria 4: 2 2009 V/C: 0.71 Max Detour Length (miles): 0 Historic: No TUP Pop: No Criteria 5: 3 2030 V/C: 1.5 Min. IRI: 2 Section 4F: No Criteria 6: 0 TOTAL: 13 Crash DELTA: 1.81 Signals Affected: 0 Note: RANK: 65 2011-2014 2015-2016 2017-2018 2019-2022 2023-2030 TOTAL ESTIMATED TIP DATES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500,000.00 $0.00 $500,000.00 Let: FUNDING SUMMARY Completion: ¨¦§81 º LOCATION ASSET MGMT BRIDGE CMAQ CONNECTOR ENHANCEMENT SAFETY TRANSIT 476 SOUTH ABINGTON ¨¦§ A M E R I C A N N L E G I O N N O M R E T M M H E H A W S T T E X T E N S D I R O N 0 A 5,000 L L E Feet D E 03616 MT HB 8 27, 20098:52:25 AM Page of 35039 MPMS# PROJECT: I-81 ITS Camera - Exit 191 6 COUNTY: Lackawanna CATEGORY: ITS MUNICIPALITY: Scranton FUNCTIONAL CLASS: 11 S.R.: 0081 Segment: 1911 NHS: Yes DESCRIPTION: I-81 Viewmont, Exit 191 - Install ITS camera PROJECT NEED: TRAFFIC FACILITY ENVIRONMENT COMMUNITY PROJECT PRIORITY Criteria 1: 3 AADT: 37529 Bridges Affected: 0 Wetland: Yes Comp Plan Zone: PA Criteria 2: 3 AATT: 8631 SD Bridge Present? Y Streams: No Transit: No Criteria 3: 3 Truck %: 23 Min Sufficiency Rating: 0 Flood Plain: No EJ Pop: Yes Criteria 4: 2 2009 V/C: 1.66 Max Detour Length (miles): 0 Historic: No TUP Pop: Yes Criteria 5: 3 2030 V/C: 3.53 Min. IRI: 2 Section 4F: No Criteria 6: 2 TOTAL: 16 Crash DELTA: 1.78 Signals Affected: 0 Note: RANK: 13 2011-2014 2015-2016 2017-2018 2019-2022 2023-2030 TOTAL ESTIMATED TIP DATES $0.00 $450,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $450,000.00 Let: FUNDING SUMMARY Completion: R A M P P U U R D º LOCATION ASSET MGMT BRIDGE CMAQ CONNECTOR ENHANCEMENT SAFETY TRANSIT ¨¦§81 A M ERI CAN LE G ION MEM HW D R A A 0 A 5,000 P P M Feet A R 03616 MT HB 8 27, 20098:52:25 AM Page of 35054 MPMS# PROJECT: I-84 Detector System - Dunmore to I-84/I-380 Interchange 10 COUNTY: Lackawanna CATEGORY: ITS MUNICIPALITY: Roaring Brook, Dunmore FUNCTIONAL CLASS: 11 S.R.: 0084 Segment: 0010 NHS: Yes DESCRIPTION: I-84 Dunmore to I-380 Interchange - Detector system at each interchange (2 detectors each direction = 4 x $30K each x 4 exits) PROJECT NEED: TRAFFIC FACILITY ENVIRONMENT COMMUNITY PROJECT PRIORITY Criteria 1: 3 AADT: 56992 Bridges Affected: 1 Wetland: Yes Comp Plan Zone: Green Criteria 2: 2 AATT: 9119 SD Bridge Present? N Streams: No Transit: Yes Criteria 3: 2 Truck %: 16 Min Sufficiency Rating: 97 Flood Plain: Yes EJ Pop: Yes Criteria 4: 2 2009 V/C: 0.96 Max Detour Length (miles): 0 Historic: No TUP Pop: Yes Criteria 5: 3 2030 V/C: 2.05 Min. IRI: 1 Section 4F: No Criteria 6: 2 TOTAL: 14 Crash DELTA: 0.48 Signals Affected: 0 Note: RANK: 55 2011-2014 2015-2016 2017-2018 2019-2022 2023-2030 TOTAL ESTIMATED TIP DATES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,400,000.00 $0.00 $1,400,000.00 Let: FUNDING SUMMARY Completion: R A THROOP D M RINKE S P T R R 8 D º LOCATION ¨¦§81 ASSET MGMT BRIDGE ¨¦§84 435 k UV CMAQ o o r CONNECTOR B g DUNMORE n ENHANCEMENT i r 435 a QR o SAFETY R TRANSIT S R R 0 0 8 4 4 S H 87 307 ROARING UV BROOK ¨¦§84 0 5,000 ELMHURST Feet 03616 MT HB 8 27, 20098:52:25 AM Page of 3501 MPMS# PROJECT: PA 347 VMS Installation 17 COUNTY: Lackawanna CATEGORY: ITS MUNICIPALITY: Dunmore FUNCTIONAL CLASS: 14 S.R.: 0347 Segment: 0020 NHS: No DESCRIPTION: Blakely Street (PA 347) - Install VMS approaching I-81 PROJECT NEED: TRAFFIC FACILITY ENVIRONMENT COMMUNITY PROJECT PRIORITY Criteria 1: 3 AADT: 25003 Bridges Affected: 1 Wetland: Yes Comp Plan Zone: MDIA Criteria 2: 3 AATT: 1751 SD Bridge Present? N Streams: No Transit: Yes Criteria 3: 2 Truck %: 7 Min Sufficiency Rating: 94.2 Flood Plain: No EJ Pop: Yes Criteria 4: 2 2009 V/C: 0.77 Max Detour Length (miles): 2 Historic: Yes TUP Pop: Yes Criteria 5: 2 2030 V/C: 1.03 Min. IRI: 2 Section 4F: No Criteria 6: 2 TOTAL: 14 Crash DELTA: 3.1 Signals Affected: 5 Note: RANK: 48 2011-2014 2015-2016 2017-2018 2019-2022 2023-2030 TOTAL ESTIMATED TIP DATES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $450,000.00 $0.00 $450,000.00 Let: FUNDING SUMMARY Completion: R A 81 M ¨¦§ P R D º LOCATION ASSET MGMT BRIDGE CMAQ CONNECTOR AM ENHANCEMENT ER I CA SAFETY N L EG TRANSIT IO N M EM H W DUNMORE ¨¦§81 8394 UV347 R A M P R 0 5,000 D 33 Feet ¨¦§84 03616 MT HB 8 27, 20098:52:25 AM Page of 35027 MPMS# PROJECT: Main Avenue Corridor Improvements 36 COUNTY: Lackawanna CATEGORY: CMAQ MUNICIPALITY: Scranton FUNCTIONAL CLASS: 16 S.R.: 3013 Segment: 0130 NHS: No DESCRIPTION: Main Avenue corridor improvements, Euclid Avenue to Bedford Street - Includes Euclid rail overpass bridge & Main-McDade ramp signals / Address high crash rates/ped crashes PROJECT NEED: TRAFFIC FACILITY ENVIRONMENT COMMUNITY PROJECT PRIORITY Criteria 1: 3 AADT: 13954 Bridges Affected: 1 Wetland: Yes Comp Plan Zone: MDIA Criteria 2: 3 AATT: 698 SD Bridge Present? N Streams: No Transit: Yes Criteria 3: 2 Truck %: 5 Min Sufficiency Rating: 69 Flood Plain: No EJ Pop: Yes Criteria 4: 2 2009 V/C: 0.83 Max Detour Length (miles): 10 Historic: Yes TUP Pop: Yes Criteria 5: 2 2030 V/C: 1.1 Min.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • Luzerne County Act 167 Phase II Stormwater Management Plan
    Executive Summary Luzerne County Act 167 Phase II Stormwater Management Plan 613 Baltimore Drive, Suite 300 Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702 Voice: 570.821.1999 Fax: 570.821.1990 www.borton-lawson.com 3893 Adler Place, Suite 100 Bethlehem, PA 18017 Voice: 484.821.0470 Fax: 484.821.0474 Submitted to: Luzerne County Planning Commission 200 North River Street Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711 June 30, 2010 Project Number: 2008-2426-00 LUZERNE COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction This Stormwater Management Plan has been developed for Luzerne County, Pennsylvania to comply with the requirements of the 1978 Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Act, Act 167. This Plan is the initial county-wide Stormwater Management Plan for Luzerne County, and serves as a Plan Update for the portions or all of six (6) watershed-based previously approved Act 167 Plans including: Bowman’s Creek (portion located in Luzerne County), Lackawanna River (portion located in Luzerne County), Mill Creek, Solomon’s Creek, Toby Creek, and Wapwallopen Creek. This report is developed to document the reasoning, methodologies, and requirements necessary to implement the Plan. The Plan covers legal, engineering, and municipal government topics which, combined, form the basis for implementation of a Stormwater Management Plan. It is the responsibility of the individual municipalities located within the County to adopt this Plan and the associated Ordinance to provide a consistent methodology for the management of stormwater throughout the County. The Plan was managed and administered by the Luzerne County Planning Commission in consultation with Borton-Lawson, Inc. The Luzerne County Planning Commission Project Manager was Nancy Snee.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway and Bridge Projects With
    Date: 5/28/20 3:53PM Page 1 of 74 Scranton/Wilke-Barre MPO TIP - Highway & Bridge Projects Lackawanna PennDOT Project Id: 7764 Project Administrator: PENNDOT Title: West Lackawanna Ave. Bridge over Conrail Railroad Improvement Type: Replace/Rehab State Route: 7302 Municipality: Scranton (CITY) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 8/22/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S19 - Widen narw. pave. or recon brdgs (No addtl lanes) Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Lackawanna County, City of Scranton, State Route 7302 (West Lackawanna Avenue) Project Description: Bridge rehabilitation/replacement on State Route 7302 (West Lackawanna Avenue) over Conrail Railroad in the City of Scranton, Lackawanna County. Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Final Design STU $0 $0 $120 $0 $0 $0 Final Design 185 $0 $0 $30 $0 $0 $0 Construction STU $0 $0 $0 $800 $0 $0 Construction 185 $0 $0 $0 $200 $0 $0 Federal: $0 $0 $120 $800 $0 $0 State: $0 $0 $30 $200 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $0 $0 $150 $1,000 $0 $0 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $1,150 PennDOT Project Id: 7911 Project Administrator: PENNDOT Title: North Main Avenue Bridge over Leggetts Creek Improvement Type: Replace/Rehab State Route: 7302 Municipality: Scranton (CITY) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 8/22/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S19 - Widen narw. pave. or recon brdgs (No addtl lanes) Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Lackawanna County, City of Scranton, North Main Avenue Bridge Project Description: Bridge rehabilitation/replacement on North Main Avenue Bridge over Leggetts Creek in the City of Scranton, Lackawanna County.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Suppl to DES for Facilities
    8005010 ) Q3 NU RE G-0564 ')lit ll Draft Supplement to the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTALSTATEMENT related to operation of SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 PENNSYLVANIAPOWER AND LIGHTCOMPANY ALLEGHENYELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50388 Published: March 1980 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, D.C. Docket g m~97 f"o"f,.oIe 8-m S-Smi &C ': '.~s REGULATORYDOCKET FILE NVREG-O56O 'MARCH 1980 DRAFT SUPPLEMENT TO THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT BY THE U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FOR SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 proposed by PENNSYLVANIA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY- ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388 I SUMMARY ANQ CONCLUSIONS This Supplement to the Qraft Environmental Statement was prepared by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Corrmission (NRC), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (the staff). 1. The action is administrative. 2. The proposed action is the issuance of construction permits by local, state, and federal agencies (including the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, SRBC) for the construction of a water storage reservoir in the Pond Hill Creek drainage basin. The proposed site is located on a small tributary of the Susquehanna River in Conyngham Township, Luzerne ,County, Pennsylvania. The site is approximately 11 km northeast of the borough of Berwick, Pennsylvania, and about 3.7 km northeast of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), now under construction. The purpose of the proposed reservoir is to supply water to the Susquehanna River during periods of low riverflow to replace the water consumptively used by SSES.
    [Show full text]
  • July 24, 2004 (Pages 3853-4004)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 34 (2004) Repository 7-24-2004 July 24, 2004 (Pages 3853-4004) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2004 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "July 24, 2004 (Pages 3853-4004)" (2004). Volume 34 (2004). 30. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2004/30 This July is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 34 (2004) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 34 Number 30 Saturday, July 24, 2004 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 3853—4004 Agencies in this issue: The Courts Department of Agriculture Department of Banking Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Environmental Hearing Board Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Liquor Control Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Philadelphia Regional Port Authority Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 356, July 2004 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents). Subscription rate $82.00 per year, postpaid to points in the United States. Individual copies $2.50.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report
    2017 ANNUAL REPORT Pitcher plant Female cardinal LETTER FROM THE Executive Director Dear Friends, Nature is so very important to children! Science has proven that children who have regular access to nature have greater creativity, better problem solving skills, enhanced cognitive abilities, higher academic performance, and reduced attention deficit. They also have improved eyesight, better social skills, more self-discipline, and reduced stress. Isn’t it truly amazing what nature can provide for our wellbeing? Given the chance, children love to be outdoors. As stewards of our communities, we owe it to our children and future generations to ensure that nature is always available to them and is a part of their lives. North Branch Land Trust’s main mission is to permanently protect woods, fields, watersheds, and farms in our region. Just as important are the efforts to connect people with the land and nature especially children through education, outreach, and experiences. Our children are our most precious asset and represent our future. If we encourage their connection to nature, not only will they benefit, but society will benefit as a whole. Juvenile pickerel frog Please enjoy North Branch Land Trust’s 2017 Annual Report; a recap of the year in land conservation, events, programs, and outreach. A community based and funded non-profit conservation organization, NBLT is working to protect the natural lands we love in Northeastern Pennsylvania and ensure that children will always have the ability and opportunity to connect with nature. Thank you for your continued support of land conservation and NBLT. Your generosity helps protect our children’s future.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
    [Show full text]
  • Enacts As Follows: Section 1. Shorttitle. This Act Shall Be Known And
    SESSION OF2002 Act 2002-223 1815 No. 2002-223 A SUPPLEMENT HB2741 To the act of December 8, 1982 (P.L.848, No.235), entitled “An act providing for the adoption of capital projects related to the repair, rehabilitation or replacement of highway bridges to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt and capital projects related to highway and safety improvement projects to be financed from current revenue of the Motor License Fund,” itemizing additional local and State bridge projects. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows: Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Highway-Railroad and Highway Bridge Capital Budget Supplemental Act for2002-2003. Section 2. Definitions. The following words and phrases when used in this act shall have the meanings given to them in this section unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: “Account.” The Highway Bridge Improvement Restricted Account within the Motor License Fund. “Capital project.” A capital project as defmed in section 302 of the act of February 9, 1999 (P.L. 1, No.1), known as the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Act, and shall include a county or municipal bridge rehabilitation, replacement or improvement project as set forth in this act. “Department.” The Department of Transportation of the Commonwealth. “Secretary.” The Secretary of Transportation of the Commonwealth. Section 3. Total authorization for bridge projects. (a) Total projects.—The total authorization for the costs of the projects itemized pursuant to this act and to be fmanced from current revenue or by the incurring of debtshall be $1,563,530,000.
    [Show full text]
  • 62 Dams Removed to Restore Rivers in 2015
    62 Dams Removed to Restore Rivers in 2015 American Rivers releases annual list including dams in California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, and Virginia Nationwide, 1300 dams have been removed from 1912 through 2015. Dam removal brings a variety of benefits to local communities, including restoring river health and clean water, revitalizing fish and wildlife, improving public safety and recreation, and enhancing local economies. Working in a variety of functions with partner organizations throughout the country, American Rivers contributed financial and technical support in many of the removals. Contact information is provided for dam removals, if available. For further information about the list, please contact Jessie Thomas-Blate, American Rivers, Associate Director of River Restoration at 202.347.7550 or [email protected]. This list includes all known dam removals that occurred in 2015, regardless of the level of American Rivers’ involvement. Inclusion on this list does not indicate endorsement by American Rivers. Dams are categorized alphabetically by state. Memorial Park Dam, Pescadero Creek, California In October 2015, the Memorial Park Dam was removed as part of the Memorial Park Fish Passage Improvement Project. This project opened 62 miles of creek habitat to coho salmon and improved migratory conditions for juvenile salmonids. The project will also increase the flood flow capacity of the river. Contact: Kellyx Nelson, San Mateo County Resource Conservation District, [email protected] San Clemente Dam, Carmel River, California Removal of the 106 feet high San Clemente Dam represents the largest dam removal project in California history.
    [Show full text]
  • 69 Dams Removed in 2020 to Restore Rivers
    69 Dams Removed in 2020 to Restore Rivers American Rivers releases annual list including dams in California, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin for a total of 23 states. Nationwide, 1,797 dams have been removed from 1912 through 2020. Dam removal brings a variety of benefits to local communities, including restoring river health and clean water, revitalizing fish and wildlife, improving public safety and recreation, and enhancing local economies. Working in a variety of functions with partner organizations throughout the country, American Rivers contributed financial and technical support in many of the removals. Contact information is provided for dam removals, if available. For further information about the list, please contact Jessie Thomas-Blate, American Rivers, Director of River Restoration at 202.347.7550 or [email protected]. This list includes all dam removals reported to American Rivers (as of February 10, 2021) that occurred in 2020, regardless of the level of American Rivers’ involvement. Inclusion on this list does not indicate endorsement by American Rivers. Dams are categorized alphabetically by state. Beale Dam, Dry Creek, California A 2016 anadromous salmonid habitat assessment stated that migratory salmonids were not likely accessing habitat upstream of Beale Lake due to the presence of the dam and an undersized pool and weir fishway. In 2020, Beale Dam, owned by the U.S. Air Force, was removed and a nature-like fishway was constructed at the upstream end of Beale Lake to address the natural falls that remain a partial barrier following dam removal.
    [Show full text]