DOCSLIB.ORG

AR002I 13 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: AS-L-60 EHRT SAMPLE NO.: 29460 23

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AR002I 13 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: AS-L-60 EHRT SAMPLE NO.: 29460 23 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND TESTING, INC. VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS CUSTOMER NAME: OBG LABORATORIES, INC. • MR. MIKE PETTERELLI SAMPLE SOURCE: Blosenskl Landfill_________________ WORK ORDER NO.: N/A________ PROJECT NO.: 12319 DATE EXTRACTED: N/A__________ DATE ANALYZED: 11-16-90 SAMPLE TYPE: Water Sample____ SAMPLE VOLUME: 0.50 ANALYST: J. Tobler DILUTION FACTOR: 1.00 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: AS-l-60 EHRT SAMPLE NO.: 29460 NOTEBOOK NO.: 162, Pg. 9_______ METHOD NO.: EPA6Q1&602 RESULT COMPOUNDS UQ/L 1. Bromodlchloromethane < 5.00 2. Bromoform < 5.00 3. Bromomethane < 5.00 4. Carton Tetrachloride < 5.00 5. Chlorobenzene 22.10 6. Chloroethane < 5.00 7. 2-CWoroethyMnyl Ether < 5.00 8. Chloroform 96.60 9. Chloromethane < 5.00 10. DlbromocMoromethane < 5.00 11. 1,2-DlcWorobenzene < 5.00 12. 1,3-DfchIorobenzene < 5.00 13. 1,4-DIchfoFobenzene < 5.00 14. DlcWorodffluofomethane < 5.00 15. 1,1-Dlchloroethane 34.10 ia 1,2-Dtchloroethane < 5.00 17. 1,1 -Dlchloroethene < 5.00 18. trans-1,2-Dlchloroethene 103.70 19. 1^-DIch(oropropane < 5.00 20. c!s-1,3-D!chloropropene < 5.00 21. trans-1,3-DichJoropropene < 5.00 22. Methylene Chloride < 10.00 AR002I 13 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: AS-l-60 EHRT SAMPLE NO.: 29460 23. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 5.00 24. Tetrachloroethene < 5.00 25. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 135.90 26. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 5.00 27. Trichloroethene 68.60 28. Trichlorofluoromethane < 5.00 29. Vinyl Chloride < 5.00 30. Benzene 1286.70 31. Ethylbenzene < 5.00 32. Toluene < 5.00 SURROGATE STANDARDS - % RECOVERIES 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 - ____110.00% Toluene-d8 - 81.00% Bromofluorobenzene - 98.00% COMPUTER SEARCH Acetone - Approx. 111.60 ug/L 4R002I \k ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND TESTING, INC. VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS CUSTOMER NAME: OBG LABORATORIES. INC. - MR. MIKE PETTERELU SAMPLE SOURCE: Blosenski Landfill______________ WORK ORDER NO.: N/A__________ PROJECT NO.: 12319 DATE EXTRACTED: N/A__________ DATE ANALYZED: 11-14-90 SAMPLE TYPE: Water Sample____ SAMPLE VOLUME: 5.00 ANALYST: J.Tobler DILUTION FACTOR: 1.00 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: AS-E-60 ___ EHRT SAMPLE NO.: 29461 LAB NOTEBOOK NO.: 162. Pg. 9_______ METHOD NO.: EPA 601 & 602 RESULT COMPOUNDS____ ug/L 1. Bromodichloromethane < 0.50 2. Bromoform < 0.50 3. Bromomethane < 0.50 4. Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.50 5. Chlorobenzene 2.94 6. Chloroethane < 0.50 7. 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether < 0.50 8. Chloroform 17.05 9. Chloromethane < 0.50 10. Dibromochloromethane < 0.50 11. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 12. 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 13. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 14. Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.50 15. 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.04 16. 1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.50 17. 1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.50 18. trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 18.00 19. 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.50 20. cis-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.50 21. trans-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.50 22. Methyiene Chloride < 1.00 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: AS-E-60________ EHRT SAMPLE NO.: 29461 23. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.50 24. Tetrachloroethene < o.SO 25. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane . 7.15 26. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.50 27. Trichloroethene 4.40 28. Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.50 29. Vinyl Chloride < 0.50 30. Benzene 122.61 31. Ethylbenzene < 0.50 32. Toluene < 0.50 SURROGATE STANDARDS - % RECOVERIES 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 - ____98.00% Toluene-d8 - 93.00% Bromofluorobenzene - 100.00% Page2 SR002I I 6 SOIL VOLATILE MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY j Name: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND TESTING. INC.______ " stomerName: OBG LABORATORIES. INC. - MR. PETTERELU_______________ Method No.: EPA 601 & 602______ Project No.: 12319 stomer Sample No.: AS-E-60_________ EHRTNo.: 29461 AMOUNT ADDED SAMPLE CONC. MS CONC. MS% QC LIMITS COMPOUND (ng) (ug/L) (ug/L) REC# REC. -Dichloroethene 250 0 56.22 112 59-172 jhloroethene 250 4.4 62.2 116 62-137 Benzene 250 123 190.8 136 66-142 uene 250 0 56.1 112 59-139 'orobenzene 250 2.9 57.6 109 60-133 MSD CONC. MSD% MS% % QCLI tflTS MPOUND (ug/L) REC# REC# RPD# RPD REC. , , . -Dichloroethene 57.5 115 112 3 22 59-172 Trichloroethene 64.8 121 116 4 24 62-137 izene 178.6 111 136 20 21 66-142 . -,uene 58 116 112 4 21 59-139 Chlorobenzene 58 110 109 0.01 21 60-133 # Column to be used to flag recovery and RPD values with an asterick . aiues outside of QC limits RPD: _____0____ out of 5 outside limits Spike Recovery:_____0____ out of 10 outside limits 'MMENTS: Page1 3RQQ2II7 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND TESTING, INC. VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS CUSTOMER NAME: OBG LABORATORIES. INC. - MR. MIKE PETTERELLI SAMPLE SOURCE: Blosenski Landfill ____ ____ . WORK ORDER NO.: N/A___________ PROJECT NO.: 12319 DATE EXTRACTED: N/A__________ DATE ANALYZED: 11-15-90 SAMPLE TYPE: Water Sample_____ SAMPLE VOLUME: 0.50 ANALYST: J.Tobler DILUTION FACTOR: 1.00 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: AS-l-50 EHRT SAMPLE NO.: 29462 LAB NOTEBOOK NO.: 162. Pg. 9_______ METHOD NO.: EPA601&602 RESULT COMPOUNDS_____ ug/L 1. Bromodlchloromethane < 5.00 2. Bromoform < 5.00 3. Bromomethane < 5.00 4. Carbon Tetrachloride < 5.00 5. Chlorobenzene 17.30 6. Chloroethane < 5.00 7. 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether < 5.00 8. Chloroform 85.40 9. Chloromethane < 5.00 10. Dibromochloromethane < 5.00 11. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 5.00 12. 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 5.00 13. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 5.00 14. Dichlorodifluoromethane < 5.00 15. 1,1-Dichloroethane 30.00 16. 1,2-Dichloroethane < 5.00 17. i,1-Dichloroethene < 5.00 18. trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 91.50 19. -1,2-Dichloropropane < 5.00 20. cis-1,3-Dichloropropene < 5.00 21. trans-1,3-Dichloropropene < 5.00 22. Methylene Chloride < 10.00 Page 1 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: AS-l-50 _____ EHRT SAMPLE NO.: 29462 23. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 5.00 24. Tetrachloroethene < 5.00 25. 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 117.70 26. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 5.00 27. Trichloroethene 37.10 28. Trichlorofluoromethane < 5.00 29. Vinyl Chloride < 5.00 30. Benzene 1210.70 31. Ethylbenzene < 5.00 32. Toluene < 5.00 SURROGATE STANDARDS - % RECOVERIES 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 - ____106.00% Toluene-d8 - 78.00% Bromofluorobenzene - 112.00% Page2 flR002l 19 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND TESTING, INC. VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS CUSTOMER NAME: OBG LABORATORIES, INC. - MR. MIKE PETTERELU SAMPLE SOURCE: Blosenski Landfill WORK ORDER NO.: N/A_____________ PROJECT NO.: 12319 DATE EXTRACTED: N/A__________ DATE ANALYZED: 1M4-90 SAMPLE TYPE: Water Sample_____ SAMPLE VOLUME: 5.00 ANALYST: J. Tobler_______ DILUTION FACTOR: 1.00 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: AS-E-50 ____ EHRT SAMPLE NO.: 29463 LAB NOTEBOOK NO.: 162. Pg. 9_______ METHOD NO.: EPA 601 & 602 RESULT COMPOUNDS____ ug/L 1. Bromodichloromethane < 0.50 2. Bromoform < 0.50 3. Bromomethane < 0.50 4. Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.50 5. Chlorobenzene 1.98 6. Chloroethane < 0.50 7. 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether < 0.50 8. Chloroform 10.92 9. Chloromethane < 0.50 10. Dibromochloromethane < 0.50 11. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 12. 1,3-Dichlorobenzene . < 0.50 13. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 14. Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.50 15. 1,1-Dlchloroethane 3.23 16. 1,2-Dlchloroethane < 0.50 17. 1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.50 18. trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 11.61 19. 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.50 20. cis-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.50 21. trans-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.50 22. Methylene Chloride < 1.00 Page1 3RQG2I20 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: AS-E-50________ EHRT SAMPLE NO.: 29463 23. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.50 24. Tetrachloroethene < 0.50 25. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4.44 26. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.50 27. Trichloroethene < 0.50 28. Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.50 29. Vinyl Chloride < 0.50 30. Benzene 81.19 31. Ethylbenzene < 0.50 32. Toluene < 0.50 SURROGATE STANDARDS - % RECOVERIES 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 - ____97.00% Toluene-d8 . - 98.00% Bromofluorobenzene - 103.00% Page2 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND TESTING, INC. VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS CUSTOMER NAME: OBG LABORATORIES, INC. - MR. MIKE PETTERELU SAMPLE SOURCE: Blosenski Landfill_________________ WORK ORDER NO.: N/A__________ PROJECT NO.: 12319 DATE EXTRACTED: N/A__________ DATE ANALYZED: 11-09-90 SAMPLE TYPE: Water Blank A SAMPLE VOLUME: 5.00 ANALYST: J.Tobler DILUTION FACTOR: 1.00 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: N/A__________ EHRT SAMPLE NO.: N/A LAB NOTEBOOK NO.: 162. Pg. 9_______ METHOD NO.: EPA601&602 RESULT COMPOUNDS____ ug/L 1. Bromodichloromethane < 0.50 2. Bromoform < 0.50 3. Bromomethane < 0.50 4. Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.50 5. Chlorobenzene < 0.50 6. Chloroethane < 0.50 7. 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether < 0.50 8. Chloroform < 0.50 9. Chloromethane < 0.50 10. Dibromochloromethane < 0.50 11. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 12. 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 13. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.50 14. Dlchlorodifluoromethane < 0.50 15. 1,1-Dichloroethane < 0.50 16. 1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.50 17. 1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.50 18. trans-1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.50 19. 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.50 20. cis-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.50 21. trans-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.50 22. Methylene Chloride < • 1.00 AR002I22 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: N/A__________ EHRT SAMPLE NO.: N/A 23. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.50 24. Tetrachloroethene < 0.50 25. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane < 0.50 26. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.50 27. Trichloroethene < 0.50 28. Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.50 29. Vinyl Chloride < 0.50 30. Benzene < 0.50 31. Ethylbenzene < 0.50 32. Toluene 0.76 SURROGATE STANDARDS - % RECOVERIES 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 - ____96.00% Toluene-d8 - 100.00% Bromofluorobenzene - 98.00% Page2 3R002123 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND TESTING, INC. VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS CUSTOMER NAME: OBG LABORATORIES, INC. - MR. MIKE PETTERELU SAMPLE SOURCE: Blosenski Landfill WORK ORDER NO.: N/A__________ PROJECT NO.: 12319 DATE EXTRACTED: N/A__________ DATE ANALYZED: 11-14-90 SAMPLE TYPE: Water Blank B SAMPLE VOLUME: 5.00 ANALYST: J.Tobler DILUTION FACTOR: 1.00 CUSTOMER SAMPLE NO.: N/A__________ EHRT SAMPLE NO.: N/A LAB NOTEBOOK NO.: 162.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (2) Agency Number: Identigcationnumber
    (1) Agency: Department of Enviroiimental Protection (2) Agency Number: IdentiGcationNumber: #7- 436 IRRC Number: 2"1"1! (3) Short Title: Stream Redesignations, Blue Eye Run, et al. (Water Quality Network (WQN) Package) (4) PA Code Cite: 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 93 (5) Agency Contacts (List Telephone Number, Address, Fax Number and Email Address): Primary Contact: Michele Tate; 717-783-8727; RCSOB, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA 17105; mtate(a),state.pa. us Secondary Contact: Kelly Heffner; 717-783-8727; RCSOB, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA 17105; kheffner(a)state.pa.us (6) Primary Contact for Public Comments (List Telephone Number, Address, Fax Number and Email Address) - Complete if different from #5: Environmental Quality Board, P.O. Box 8477, Harrisburg, PA 17105 Express Mail: Environmental Quality Board, Rachel Carson State Office Building, 16th Floor, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA 17101-2301 Email: [email protected] (All Comments will appear on IRRC'S website) (7) Type of Rulemaking (check applicable box): EZf Proposed Regulation • Final Regulation Q Final Omitted Regulation Q Emergency Certification Regulation; O Certification by the Governor Q Certification by the Attorney General (8) Briefly explain the regulation in clear and nontechnical language. (100 words or less) This proposal modifies Chapter 93 to reflect the recommended redesignation of streams shown on the attached list. The changes include streams being considered for redesignation as Exceptional Value (EV) Waters. The changes provide the appropriate designated use for these streams to protect existing uses. These changes may, upon implementation, result in more stringent treatment requirements for new and/or expanded wastewater discharges to the streams in order to protect the existing and designated water uses.
    [Show full text]
  • December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 33 (2003) Repository 12-20-2003 December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396)" (2003). Volume 33 (2003). 51. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003/51 This December is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 33 (2003) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 33 Number 51 Saturday, December 20, 2003 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 6197—6396 Agencies in this issue: The Governor The Courts Department of Aging Department of Agriculture Department of Banking Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Revenue Fish and Boat Commission Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Public School Employees’ Retirement Board State Board of Education State Board of Nursing State Employee’s Retirement Board State Police Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 349, December 2003 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents).
    [Show full text]
  • Scranton Throop W 11 58 Jefferson
    MPMS# PROJECT: I-81 Detector System - Pittston to Clarks Summit 4 COUNTY: Lackawanna CATEGORY: ITS MUNICIPALITY: FUNCTIONAL CLASS: 11 S.R.: 0081 Segment: 1860 NHS: Yes DESCRIPTION: I-81 Pittston to Clarks Summit - Detector system at each interchange (2 detectors each direction = 4 X $30K each x 15 exits) PROJECT NEED: TRAFFIC FACILITY ENVIRONMENT COMMUNITY PROJECT PRIORITY Criteria 1: 3 AADT: 81716 Bridges Affected: 14 Wetland: Yes Comp Plan Zone: MDIA Criteria 2: 2 AATT: 15116 SD Bridge Present? N Streams: No Transit: Yes Criteria 3: 2 Truck %: 19 Min Sufficiency Rating: 51.8 Flood Plain: Yes EJ Pop: Yes Criteria 4: 2 2009 V/C: 0.93 Max Detour Length (miles): 99 Historic: Yes TUP Pop: Yes Criteria 5: 3 2030 V/C: 1.97 Min. IRI: 1 Section 4F: Yes Criteria 6: 2 524 TOTAL: 14 Crash DELTA: 0.59 Signals Affected: QR 0 Note: RANK: 54 ESTIMATED 2011-2014 2015-2016632 2017-2018 QR6322019-2022 2023-2030 TOTAL TIP QR DATES $0.00 $0.00 $3,800,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,800,000.00 Let: QR347 6 £11 ¤ 247QR 6 FUNDING SUMMARY ¤£ i Completion: r v e R 307 46 8006 aw na QR CLARKS N ck an SCOTT La ARCHBALD 307 SUMMIT O BLAKELY UV T D Y R A A H D L IELD 14 43 S Y NE RF 6 º L A A F G AV LOCATION ¤£ 34 R D O 62958 DICKSON 47 R T JESSUP ASSET MGMT E CITY S 57487 S N NEWTOND T I R ACRE A BRIDGE NEWT 200 M O L N 32 247 CMAQ B RD D 13 HILL 7912 L 80797 UV M M L R e E g CONNECTOR C O R g S k OLYPHANT U ert C ree H N A ENHANCEMENT URCH MILWA 8212 A HILL UK L D E M H R R ARS OO 247 SAFETY D E - 476 W QR R N R D TRANSIT O D ¨¦§ T SCRANTON THROOP W 11 58 JEFFERSON E £
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry
    GEOCHEMISTRY GENERAL CONCLUSIONS As part of the watershed study, a geochemical survey was conducted to determine the condition of the streams, with respect to coal mine drainage. The geochemical characteristics of coal mine drainage as well as the chemical reactions taking place between mine discharges and receiving streams were investigated with applications of the geochemistry to abatement procedures. Analysis performed on water samples included pH, acidity, alkalinity, Ca, Mg, Na, 2+ 2- K, Al, Ni, Si, Total Fe, Fe , and S04 . Water pollution caused by coal mine drainage has destroyed or severely affected large parts of Pennsylvania. Over 3,000 miles of streams and 302,400 acres of wildlife habitat have been adversely affected by strip and surface mining as a result of coal production in the Commonwealth (5). In the Mahanoy Creek watershed alone over 84 MGD of mine drainage enters the streams resulting in deterioration of water quality throughout the watershed. BRIEF REVIEW OF COAL MINE DRAINAGE The general nature of acid mine drainage, although complex, has been well reported to date (6) (8) (9). During mining, ground-water movement as well as aquifers are disrupted, bringing subsurface waters in contact with pyritic materials in the coal and in the associated rock strata. In many cases the flow directions are so drastically changed that the mine workings are inundated forming underground mine pools and causing water to drain through numerous mine openings. By exposing the sulfuritic materials, primarily pyrite and marcasite, to air and moisture, oxidation of these minerals occurs, resulting in products such as ferric hydroxide, ferrous sulfate and sulfuric acid.
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway and Bridge Projects With
    Date: 5/28/20 3:53PM Page 1 of 74 Scranton/Wilke-Barre MPO TIP - Highway & Bridge Projects Lackawanna PennDOT Project Id: 7764 Project Administrator: PENNDOT Title: West Lackawanna Ave. Bridge over Conrail Railroad Improvement Type: Replace/Rehab State Route: 7302 Municipality: Scranton (CITY) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 8/22/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S19 - Widen narw. pave. or recon brdgs (No addtl lanes) Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Lackawanna County, City of Scranton, State Route 7302 (West Lackawanna Avenue) Project Description: Bridge rehabilitation/replacement on State Route 7302 (West Lackawanna Avenue) over Conrail Railroad in the City of Scranton, Lackawanna County. Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Final Design STU $0 $0 $120 $0 $0 $0 Final Design 185 $0 $0 $30 $0 $0 $0 Construction STU $0 $0 $0 $800 $0 $0 Construction 185 $0 $0 $0 $200 $0 $0 Federal: $0 $0 $120 $800 $0 $0 State: $0 $0 $30 $200 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $0 $0 $150 $1,000 $0 $0 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $1,150 PennDOT Project Id: 7911 Project Administrator: PENNDOT Title: North Main Avenue Bridge over Leggetts Creek Improvement Type: Replace/Rehab State Route: 7302 Municipality: Scranton (CITY) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 8/22/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S19 - Widen narw. pave. or recon brdgs (No addtl lanes) Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Lackawanna County, City of Scranton, North Main Avenue Bridge Project Description: Bridge rehabilitation/replacement on North Main Avenue Bridge over Leggetts Creek in the City of Scranton, Lackawanna County.
    [Show full text]
  • West Branch Subbasin AMD Remediation Strategy
    Publication 254 West Branch Susquehanna Subbasin May 2008 AMD Remediation Strategy: West Branch Susquehanna Background, Data Assessment River Task Force and Method Development Despite the enormous legacy ■ INTRODUCTION Pristine setting along the West Branch Susquehanna River. of pollution from abandoned mine The West Branch Susquehanna drainage (AMD) in the West Subbasin, draining a 6,978-square-mile Branch Susquehanna Subbasin, area in northcentral Pennsylvania, is the there has been mounting support largest of the six major subbasins in and enthusiasm for a fully restored the Susquehanna River Basin (Figure 1). watershed. Under the leadership The West Branch Susquehanna of Governor Edward G. Rendell Subbasin is one of extreme contrasts. While and with support from it has some of the Commonwealth’s Trout Unlimited, Pennsylvania most pristine and treasured waterways, Department of Environmental including 1,249 miles of Exceptional Protection Secretary Kathleen Value streams and scenic forestlands and mountains, it also unfortunately M. Smith McGinty established the West bears the legacy of past Branch Susquehanna River Task unregulated mining. With Abandoned mine lands in Clearfield County. Force (Task Force) in 2004. 1,205 miles of waterways The goal of the Task Force is to impaired by AMD, it is the assist and advise the department and most AMD-impaired region its partners as they work toward of the entire Susquehanna the long-term goal to remediate the River Basin (Figure 2). At its most degraded region’s AMD. sites, the West Branch The Task Force is comprised Susquehanna River contains of state, federal, and regional acidity concentrations of agencies, Trout Unlimited, and nearly 200 milligrams per other conservation and watershed liter (mg/l), and iron and aluminum concentrations of organizations (members are identified A.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 93, Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Ch. 93 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS 25 CHAPTER 93. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 93.1. Definitions. 93.2. Scope. 93.3. Protected water uses. 93.4. Statewide water uses. ANTIDEGRADATION REQUIREMENTS 93.4a. Antidegradation. 93.4b. Qualifying as High Quality or Exceptional Value Waters. 93.4c. Implementation of antidegradation requirements. 93.4d. Processing of petitions, evaluations and assessments to change a designated use. 93.5. [Reserved]. WATER QUALITY CRITERIA 93.6. General water quality criteria. 93.7. Specific water quality criteria. 93.8. [Reserved]. 93.8a. Toxic substances. 93.8b. Metals criteria. 93.8c. Human health and aquatic life criteria for toxic substances. 93.8d. Development of site-specific water quality criteria. 93.8e. Special criteria for the Great Lakes System. DESIGNATED WATER USES AND WATER QUALITY CRITERIA 93.9. Designated water uses and water quality criteria. 93.9a. Drainage List A. 93.9b. Drainage List B. 93.9c. Drainage List C. 93.9d. Drainage List D. 93.9e. Drainage List E. 93.9f. Drainage List F. 93.9g. Drainage List G. 93.9h. Drainage List H. 93.9i. Drainage List I. 93.9j. Drainage List J. 93.9k. Drainage List K. 93.9l. Drainage List L.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 45 (2015) Repository
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 45 (2015) Repository 10-17-2015 October 17, 2015 (Pages 6187-6258) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2015 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "October 17, 2015 (Pages 6187-6258)" (2015). Volume 45 (2015). 42. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2015/42 This October is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 45 (2015) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 45 Number 42 Saturday, October 17, 2015 • Harrisburg, PA Pages 6187—6258 Agencies in this issue Department of Agriculture Department of Banking and Securities Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Department of Environmental Protection Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Transportation Environmental Quality Board Executive Board Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission State Board of Nursing State Employee’s Retirement Board State Real Estate Commission Susquehanna River Basin Commission Detailed list of contents appears inside. Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): Pennsylvania Bulletin Pennsylvania No. 491, October 2015 TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY Attn: 800 Church Rd. W. 17055-3198
    [Show full text]