GEOLOGY and MINERAL RESOURCES of the BERWICK QUADRANGLE, LUZERNE and COLUMBIA Counties, PENNSYLVANIA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GEOLOGY and MINERAL RESOURCES of the BERWICK QUADRANGLE, LUZERNE and COLUMBIA Counties, PENNSYLVANIA Atlas 174c GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE BERWICK QUADRANGLE, LUZERNE AND COLUMBIA COUNtiES, PENNSYLVANIA by Jon D. Inners Pennsylvania Geological Survey PENNSYLVANIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOURTH SERIES HARRISBURG 1978 .. AtlasAtlas174c 174c GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE BERWICK QUADRANGLE, LUZERNE AND COLUMBIA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA byby Jono n D.D. Inners Pennsylvania Geological Survey PENNSYLVANIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOURTH SERIES HARRISBURG 19781978 Copyright 1978 by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania QuotatQuotationsions from this book may be published if credit is given to the Pennsylvania Geological Survey PREFACE This report with its accompanying maps describes the nature and dis­ tribution of rock formations and surficial deposits in the vicinity of Ber­ wick, northeastern Pennsylvania. The Berwick area has a particularly in­ teresting geologic setting because it lies on the crest of one of the major rock fold structures in the Pennsylvania Appalachians and because it is situated at the edge of the great "terminal moraine," which was deposited by glacial ice and meltwater streams at the end of the Ice Age. Both of these geologic factors have a profound effect on land use, mineral resources, and environ­ mental conditionsconditions.. Special attention is paid to the influence of geology on groundwater occurrence and quality, cut-slope stability, excavation diffi­ culty, foundation stability, and waste disposal. The vast sand and gravel re­ sources of the area are described, and their geologic significance is ex­ plainedplained.. The report is designed to have educational as well as practical applications; it is hoped that it will prove not only useful to the professional geologist, engineer, and planner, but also informative to the student and in­ terested layman. ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICA nON MAY BE PURCHASED FROM STATE BOOK STORE, P. O.O. BOX 1365 HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17125 iii CONTENTS Page Preface. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. iii Abstract. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Introduction.Introduction. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2 2 Physical setting. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 3. 3 Acknowledgements. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .5 5 Bedrock structure. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 5 Folds. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5. 5 Faults. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .7 . 7 CleaCleavage vage.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 Joints. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11 Fracture traces . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 15 Origin and age of surficial deposits .......... :.- . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 16 Mineral resources. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 22 Sand and gravel ..................................... " 23 Crushed stone. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 27 Clay shale. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 28 Uranium ............................................. 28 Particulate coal and coaly shale .......................... " 28 References . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 31 Glossary. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 33 ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURES IN TEXT Figure 1. Equal-area lower-hemisphere projection of poles to bed­ ding, poles to cleavage, bedding-cleavage intersections, and axes of minor folds . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .6 6 2. Equal-area lower-hemisphere projection of poles to wedge faults, slickenlines on wedge faults, and slickenlines on bedding .... , .. ... ... ... ... ... .... .... 8 3. Equal-area lower-hemisphere projection of poles to joints in the Marcellus, Mahantango, and Harrell Formations. 12 4. Equal-area lower-hemisphere projection of poles to joints in the Trimmers Rock, Catskill, and Pocono Formations on the north flank of the Berwick anticlinorium. .. .. .. .. .. 13 5. Equal-area lower-hemisphere projection of poles to joints in the Trimmers Rock, Catskill, Spechty Kopf, Pocono, and Mauch Chunk Formations on the south flank of the Berwick anticlinorium. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 14 Page PLATES 'igure 6. Diagram showing orientation of fracture traces and line- (in envelope) aments. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 15 Plate 1.I. Bedrock geologic map of the Berwick quadrangle, Luzerne and 7. Diagram showing approximate absolute time at which Columbia Counties, Pennsylvania. various surficial processes that left a depositional record 2. Surficial geologic map of the Berwick quadrangle, Luzerne and were active in the Berwick quadrangle . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 16 Columbia Counties, Pennsylvania. 8. Cumulative curves of grain-size distribution for Wood- fordian sand and samples. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 24 grgr~iVel~lVel 9. Histograms showing the lithologic composition of Wood- TABLES fordian sand and gravel samples. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 25 10. Cumulative curves of grain-size distribution for Holocene Page coaly sand and gravel and sand samplessamples. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 30 Table 1. Summary of test results for clay shale samples .... .. .. .. .. 29 2. Percent of particulate coal in coaly sand and gravel and FIGURES ON PLATE 1 sand samples ......................................................... ............ 31 1iguresligures 1-5. Photographs showing- 1. Large-scale planar cross beds in greenish-gray medium-grained sandstone, Sherman Creek Member of the Catskill For­ mationmation.. 2. Rubble slide in moderatelymOderately dipping sandstone, Sherman Creek Member of the Catskill Formation. 3. Calcareous fossil shell (brachiopod) lenses in the middle part of the Trimmers Rock Formation. 4. Siltstone beds, some distinctly graded, in the lower part of the Trimmers Rock FormationFormation.. 5. Coarse cleavage in argillaceous, micritic limestone, Tully Member of the Mahantango Formation. FIGURES ON PLATE 2 '"igures 1-7. Photographs showing- 1. Convoluted sharpstone colluvium derived from greenish-gray sandstone and silty clay shale of the Irish Valley Member (Catskill Formation). 2. Typical bedding and sorting variations in Woodfordian out- wash. 3. Cobbly outwash of the 575-foot (175-m) terrace. 4. Cut in a Woodfordian outwash terrace. 5.5. Inclined bedding in a Woodfordian kame terrace. 6. Torrential bedding in Woodfordian frontal-kame deposits. 7. Large quartz-conglomerate erratic (Pocono or Pottsville For­ mation) in Woodfordian ground moraine. vi vviiii GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE BERWICK OUADRANGLE. LUZERNE AND COLUMBIA COUNTIES.COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA by Jon D. lnnersInners ABSTRACT The Berwick 771f2-minute1/2-minute quadrangle is situated astride the North Branch, Susquehanna River, in the Appalachian Mountain section of the Valley and Ridge physiographic province. Although the topography is mainly controlled by the resistance to erosion of folded sedimentary rocks, depositional landforms related t9tp glacial and glaciofluvial proc­ esses are well developed in the eastern and central parts of the mapped area. Bedrock formations that underlie the quadrangle range from the Silurian Wills Creek Formation to the Mississippian Mauch Chunk Forma­ tion. The rocks are predominantly marine limestones, shales, and siltsilt­­ stones in the lower part of the stratigraphie column (Wills Creek to Trimmers Rock interval) and nonmarine shales, sandstones, and con­ glomerates in the upper part (Catskill to Mauch Chunk interval). The dominant bedrock structure in the quadrangle is the Berwick anticlinorium, which plunges gently northeastward and is flanked on the north and south by the Lackawanna and CatawissaCatawissa-McCauley-McCauley Mountain synclinoria, respectivelyrespectively... Fold limbs are composed of long, planar seg­ ments separated by sharp hinges. Faults constitute a subordinate part of the structure, although two large south-dipping reverse faults are in­ ferred to displace Silurian and Devonian rocks beneath the terrace gravels at Berwick. Cleavage, which is well developed in argillaceous rocks and also affects limestones, siltstones, and fine-grained sandstones, generally dips steeply to the south and fans across the Berwick anti­ clinoriumclinorium.. Joints are developed in all lithologies and are generally ap­ proximately perpendicular to bedding. Fracture-trace orientations appear to reflect joint trends. Unconsolidated deposits of Pleistocene and Holocene age comprise numerous surficial units-titls,units-tills, iceice-contact-contact stratified drift, kame-terrace and frontal-kame gravels, outwash, and alluvium-which form a blanket over more than half the mapped area. Deposits of three episodes of con­ tinental glaciation can be differentiated on the bases of morphological preservation, depth of weathering, and clast lithologylithology.. These glacial events are probably correlative with the Illinoian (oldest), Altonian, and BERWICK QUADRANGLE INTRODUCTION 3 oodfordian (youngest) glaciations, which have been recognized in ad­ (1970
Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scranton Throop W 11 58 Jefferson
    MPMS# PROJECT: I-81 Detector System - Pittston to Clarks Summit 4 COUNTY: Lackawanna CATEGORY: ITS MUNICIPALITY: FUNCTIONAL CLASS: 11 S.R.: 0081 Segment: 1860 NHS: Yes DESCRIPTION: I-81 Pittston to Clarks Summit - Detector system at each interchange (2 detectors each direction = 4 X $30K each x 15 exits) PROJECT NEED: TRAFFIC FACILITY ENVIRONMENT COMMUNITY PROJECT PRIORITY Criteria 1: 3 AADT: 81716 Bridges Affected: 14 Wetland: Yes Comp Plan Zone: MDIA Criteria 2: 2 AATT: 15116 SD Bridge Present? N Streams: No Transit: Yes Criteria 3: 2 Truck %: 19 Min Sufficiency Rating: 51.8 Flood Plain: Yes EJ Pop: Yes Criteria 4: 2 2009 V/C: 0.93 Max Detour Length (miles): 99 Historic: Yes TUP Pop: Yes Criteria 5: 3 2030 V/C: 1.97 Min. IRI: 1 Section 4F: Yes Criteria 6: 2 524 TOTAL: 14 Crash DELTA: 0.59 Signals Affected: QR 0 Note: RANK: 54 ESTIMATED 2011-2014 2015-2016632 2017-2018 QR6322019-2022 2023-2030 TOTAL TIP QR DATES $0.00 $0.00 $3,800,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,800,000.00 Let: QR347 6 £11 ¤ 247QR 6 FUNDING SUMMARY ¤£ i Completion: r v e R 307 46 8006 aw na QR CLARKS N ck an SCOTT La ARCHBALD 307 SUMMIT O BLAKELY UV T D Y R A A H D L IELD 14 43 S Y NE RF 6 º L A A F G AV LOCATION ¤£ 34 R D O 62958 DICKSON 47 R T JESSUP ASSET MGMT E CITY S 57487 S N NEWTOND T I R ACRE A BRIDGE NEWT 200 M O L N 32 247 CMAQ B RD D 13 HILL 7912 L 80797 UV M M L R e E g CONNECTOR C O R g S k OLYPHANT U ert C ree H N A ENHANCEMENT URCH MILWA 8212 A HILL UK L D E M H R R ARS OO 247 SAFETY D E - 476 W QR R N R D TRANSIT O D ¨¦§ T SCRANTON THROOP W 11 58 JEFFERSON E £
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • Highway and Bridge Projects With
    Date: 5/28/20 3:53PM Page 1 of 74 Scranton/Wilke-Barre MPO TIP - Highway & Bridge Projects Lackawanna PennDOT Project Id: 7764 Project Administrator: PENNDOT Title: West Lackawanna Ave. Bridge over Conrail Railroad Improvement Type: Replace/Rehab State Route: 7302 Municipality: Scranton (CITY) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 8/22/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S19 - Widen narw. pave. or recon brdgs (No addtl lanes) Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Lackawanna County, City of Scranton, State Route 7302 (West Lackawanna Avenue) Project Description: Bridge rehabilitation/replacement on State Route 7302 (West Lackawanna Avenue) over Conrail Railroad in the City of Scranton, Lackawanna County. Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Final Design STU $0 $0 $120 $0 $0 $0 Final Design 185 $0 $0 $30 $0 $0 $0 Construction STU $0 $0 $0 $800 $0 $0 Construction 185 $0 $0 $0 $200 $0 $0 Federal: $0 $0 $120 $800 $0 $0 State: $0 $0 $30 $200 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $0 $0 $150 $1,000 $0 $0 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $1,150 PennDOT Project Id: 7911 Project Administrator: PENNDOT Title: North Main Avenue Bridge over Leggetts Creek Improvement Type: Replace/Rehab State Route: 7302 Municipality: Scranton (CITY) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 8/22/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S19 - Widen narw. pave. or recon brdgs (No addtl lanes) Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Lackawanna County, City of Scranton, North Main Avenue Bridge Project Description: Bridge rehabilitation/replacement on North Main Avenue Bridge over Leggetts Creek in the City of Scranton, Lackawanna County.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report
    2017 ANNUAL REPORT Pitcher plant Female cardinal LETTER FROM THE Executive Director Dear Friends, Nature is so very important to children! Science has proven that children who have regular access to nature have greater creativity, better problem solving skills, enhanced cognitive abilities, higher academic performance, and reduced attention deficit. They also have improved eyesight, better social skills, more self-discipline, and reduced stress. Isn’t it truly amazing what nature can provide for our wellbeing? Given the chance, children love to be outdoors. As stewards of our communities, we owe it to our children and future generations to ensure that nature is always available to them and is a part of their lives. North Branch Land Trust’s main mission is to permanently protect woods, fields, watersheds, and farms in our region. Just as important are the efforts to connect people with the land and nature especially children through education, outreach, and experiences. Our children are our most precious asset and represent our future. If we encourage their connection to nature, not only will they benefit, but society will benefit as a whole. Juvenile pickerel frog Please enjoy North Branch Land Trust’s 2017 Annual Report; a recap of the year in land conservation, events, programs, and outreach. A community based and funded non-profit conservation organization, NBLT is working to protect the natural lands we love in Northeastern Pennsylvania and ensure that children will always have the ability and opportunity to connect with nature. Thank you for your continued support of land conservation and NBLT. Your generosity helps protect our children’s future.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • 62 Dams Removed to Restore Rivers in 2015
    62 Dams Removed to Restore Rivers in 2015 American Rivers releases annual list including dams in California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, and Virginia Nationwide, 1300 dams have been removed from 1912 through 2015. Dam removal brings a variety of benefits to local communities, including restoring river health and clean water, revitalizing fish and wildlife, improving public safety and recreation, and enhancing local economies. Working in a variety of functions with partner organizations throughout the country, American Rivers contributed financial and technical support in many of the removals. Contact information is provided for dam removals, if available. For further information about the list, please contact Jessie Thomas-Blate, American Rivers, Associate Director of River Restoration at 202.347.7550 or [email protected]. This list includes all known dam removals that occurred in 2015, regardless of the level of American Rivers’ involvement. Inclusion on this list does not indicate endorsement by American Rivers. Dams are categorized alphabetically by state. Memorial Park Dam, Pescadero Creek, California In October 2015, the Memorial Park Dam was removed as part of the Memorial Park Fish Passage Improvement Project. This project opened 62 miles of creek habitat to coho salmon and improved migratory conditions for juvenile salmonids. The project will also increase the flood flow capacity of the river. Contact: Kellyx Nelson, San Mateo County Resource Conservation District, [email protected] San Clemente Dam, Carmel River, California Removal of the 106 feet high San Clemente Dam represents the largest dam removal project in California history.
    [Show full text]
  • 69 Dams Removed in 2020 to Restore Rivers
    69 Dams Removed in 2020 to Restore Rivers American Rivers releases annual list including dams in California, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin for a total of 23 states. Nationwide, 1,797 dams have been removed from 1912 through 2020. Dam removal brings a variety of benefits to local communities, including restoring river health and clean water, revitalizing fish and wildlife, improving public safety and recreation, and enhancing local economies. Working in a variety of functions with partner organizations throughout the country, American Rivers contributed financial and technical support in many of the removals. Contact information is provided for dam removals, if available. For further information about the list, please contact Jessie Thomas-Blate, American Rivers, Director of River Restoration at 202.347.7550 or [email protected]. This list includes all dam removals reported to American Rivers (as of February 10, 2021) that occurred in 2020, regardless of the level of American Rivers’ involvement. Inclusion on this list does not indicate endorsement by American Rivers. Dams are categorized alphabetically by state. Beale Dam, Dry Creek, California A 2016 anadromous salmonid habitat assessment stated that migratory salmonids were not likely accessing habitat upstream of Beale Lake due to the presence of the dam and an undersized pool and weir fishway. In 2020, Beale Dam, owned by the U.S. Air Force, was removed and a nature-like fishway was constructed at the upstream end of Beale Lake to address the natural falls that remain a partial barrier following dam removal.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Chesapeake Bay Pollutant Reduction Plan for Wyoming Valley Sanitary Authority (Wvsa)
    369 East Park Drive Harrisburg, PA 17111 (717) 564-1121 www.hrg-inc.com August 2017 REGIONAL CHESAPEAKE BAY POLLUTANT REDUCTION PLAN FOR WYOMING VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY (WVSA) PREPARED FOR: WVSA LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA HRG Project No. R005655.0426 ©Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc., 2017 REGIONAL CHESAPEAKE BAY POLLUTANT REDUCTION PLAN FOR WYOMING VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY, LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Introduction Section A – Public Participation Section B – Maps Section C – Pollutants of Concern Section D – Existing Pollutants of Concern Loading D.1 Baseline Pollutant Load Calculation D.2 Baseline Adjustment Section E – Select BMPs to Achieve the Minimum Required Reductions in Pollutant Loading E.1 Pollutant Reduction Requirements E.2 Proposed BMPs E.3 Partnerships E.4 Reportable BMPs Section F – Funding Mechanism Section G – BMP Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Appendices Appendix I – MS4 Permittee Participant List Appendix II – Public Comment Documentation Appendix III – Impaired Sewershed Maps Appendix IV – MS4 Municipal Requirements Appendix V – Existing Pollutant Loading Calculations Appendix VI – Pollutant Load Reduction Requirements BMP Strategy Pollutant Load Reduction Calculations Appendix VII – BMP Schematic Construction Details Regional Chesapeake Bay Pollutant Reduction Plan Wyoming Valley Sanitary Authority, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Page 1 Executive Summary The Wyoming Valley Sanitary Authority (WVSA) has expanded their purpose and powers to include stormwater management. This
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL SESSION FLOOD CONTROL and HAZARD MITIGATION ITEMIZATION ACT of 1996 Act of Jul
    SPECIAL SESSION FLOOD CONTROL AND HAZARD MITIGATION ITEMIZATION ACT OF 1996 Act of Jul. 11, 1996, Special Session 2, P.L. 1791, No. 8 Cl. 86 Special Session No. 2 of 1996 No. 1996-8 AN ACT Itemizing public improvement projects for flood protection and flood damage repair to be constructed by the Department of General Services, together with their estimated financial costs; authorizing the use of disaster assistance bond funding for financing the projects to be constructed by the Department of General Services; stating the estimated useful life of the projects; making an appropriation; providing for the adoption of specific blizzard or flood mitigation projects or flood assistance projects to be financed from current revenues or from debt incurred under clause (1) of subsection (a) of section 7 of Article VIII of the Constitution of Pennsylvania; and making repeals. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows: CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 101. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Special Session Flood Control and Hazard Mitigation Itemization Act of 1996. CHAPTER 3 FLOOD CAPITAL BUDGET PROJECT ITEMIZATIONS Section 301. Short title of chapter. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Special Session Flood Capital Budget Project Itemization Act of 1996. Section 302. Construction of chapter. The provisions of this chapter shall be construed unless specifically provided otherwise as a supplement to the act of July 6, 1995 (P.L.269, No.38), known as the Capital Budget Act of 1995-1996. Section 303. Total authorization.
    [Show full text]
  • Class a Wild Trout Waters Created: August 16, 2021 Definition of Class
    Class A Wild Trout Waters Created: August 16, 2021 Definition of Class A Waters: Streams that support a population of naturally produced trout of sufficient size and abundance to support a long-term and rewarding sport fishery. Management: Natural reproduction, wild populations with no stocking. Definition of Ownership: Percent Public Ownership: the percent of stream section that is within publicly owned land is listed in this column, publicly owned land consists of state game lands, state forest, state parks, etc. Important Note to Anglers: Many waters in Pennsylvania are on private property, the listing or mapping of waters by the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission DOES NOT guarantee public access. Always obtain permission to fish on private property. Percent Lower Limit Lower Limit Length Public County Water Section Fishery Section Limits Latitude Longitude (miles) Ownership Adams Carbaugh Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Carbaugh Reservoir pool 39.871810 -77.451700 1.50 100 Adams East Branch Antietam Creek 1 Brook Headwaters to Waynesboro Reservoir inlet 39.818420 -77.456300 2.40 100 Adams-Franklin Hayes Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 31 Bedford Bear Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Mouth 40.207730 -78.317500 0.77 100 Bedford Ott Town Run 1 Brown Headwaters to Mouth 39.978611 -78.440833 0.60 0 Bedford Potter Creek 2 Brown T 609 bridge to Mouth 40.189160 -78.375700 3.30 0 Bedford Three Springs Run 2 Brown Rt 869 bridge at New Enterprise to Mouth 40.171320 -78.377000 2.00 0 Bedford UNT To Shobers Run (RM 6.50) 2 Brown
    [Show full text]
  • Creating More Flood Resilient Communities: Riverfront Master Planning for Shickshinny Borough
    CREATING MORE FLOOD RESILIENT COMMUNITIES: RIVERFRONT MASTER PLANNING FOR SHICKSHINNY BOROUGH November 2013 CREATING MORE FLOOD RESILIENT COMMUNITIES: RIVERFRONT MASTER PLANNING FOR SHICKSHINNY BOROUGH November 2013 Funding - The Funding that made this project possible comes from PA Department of Community & Economic Development, PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources and the Chesapeake Bay Commission. Special Thanks Partners – Shickshinny Borough Shickshinny Forward Luzerne County Planning and GIS PA Department of Community and Economic Development PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Chesapeake Bay Commission SEDA-Council of Governments - Kathy Hannaford Susquehanna Greenway Partnership – Trish Carothers Dale Freudenberger, Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Erin Pierce Student Interns - Tom Krajewski Renee Noll Amanda Taylor Michelle Zucker Taylor Wolfe Project Coordinator - Brian S. Auman / Landscape Architecture, LLC Brian S. Auman / Landscape Architecture, LLC Flooding – A Global Issue After the flooding in the fall of 2011, the Susquehanna Greenway Partnership (SGP) organization thought long and hard about the best way to respond to the devastation. The SGP outlined an approach to provide technical assistance to two River Towns significantly impacted by the flooding and was successful in securing PA DCED. PA DCNR and Chesapeake Bay Commission funding for the effort. Creative minds around the world are currently working on the issue of flooding from sea level rise and the increased reoccurrence and severity of flooding events. The SGP is pleased to be part of this global effort – as it seeks to find pragmatic and functional local solutions to flood-prone communities along the Susquehanna River. Flooding – A Global Issue Global Climate Change Storm Intensity Storm Frequency The New Normal Flood Control Solutions Engineers, architects, landscape architects and planners worldwide are grappling to find workable solutions to prevent and mitigate the impacts of flooding.
    [Show full text]