DOCSLIB.ORG

Enacts As Follows: Section 1. Shorttitle. This Act Shall Be Known And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enacts As Follows: Section 1. Shorttitle. This Act Shall Be Known And SESSION OF2002 Act 2002-223 1815 No. 2002-223 A SUPPLEMENT HB2741 To the act of December 8, 1982 (P.L.848, No.235), entitled “An act providing for the adoption of capital projects related to the repair, rehabilitation or replacement of highway bridges to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt and capital projects related to highway and safety improvement projects to be financed from current revenue of the Motor License Fund,” itemizing additional local and State bridge projects. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows: Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Highway-Railroad and Highway Bridge Capital Budget Supplemental Act for2002-2003. Section 2. Definitions. The following words and phrases when used in this act shall have the meanings given to them in this section unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: “Account.” The Highway Bridge Improvement Restricted Account within the Motor License Fund. “Capital project.” A capital project as defmed in section 302 of the act of February 9, 1999 (P.L. 1, No.1), known as the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Act, and shall include a county or municipal bridge rehabilitation, replacement or improvement project as set forth in this act. “Department.” The Department of Transportation of the Commonwealth. “Secretary.” The Secretary of Transportation of the Commonwealth. Section 3. Total authorization for bridge projects. (a) Total projects.—The total authorization for the costs of the projects itemized pursuant to this act and to be fmanced from current revenue or by the incurring of debtshall be $1,563,530,000. (b) State projects.—The authorization for capital projects in the category of highway bridge projects and forestry and State park bridge projects to be constructed by the Department of Transportation, its successors or assigns and to be financedby the incurring of debt or from the account, itemized in thisact under the category of State bridges, shall be $1,168,735,000. (c) Non-State projects.—The authorization for non-State highway bridge projects to be constructed by municipalities and to be financed in part with grants not exceeding 80% of the non-Federal share of the costs made to the local government municipalities by the department from revenues deposited in the account, itemized in this act under the category of local bridges, shall be $394,795,000. 1816 Act 2002-223 LAWS OF PENNSYLVANIA Section 4. Itemization of bridge projects. The individual capital projects in the category of highway projects to be constructed by the Department of Transportation. its successors or assigns and to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt are hereby itemized, together with their estimated financial costs, in the following sections. Section 5. Adams County. (a) Local Bridges (1) Hamilton Township, TR 471, HomeRoad Bridge over Beaver Creek, Bridge Replacement 260,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $185,000) (Land Allocation - $15,000) (Design and Contingencies - $60,000) (2) Hamilton Township, TR 469, Protectory Road Bridge over Beaver Creek, Bridge Replacement 265,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $180,000) (Land Allocation - $25,000) (Design and Contingencies - $60,000) (3) Hamilton Township, TR 473, St. Mary’s Road Bridge over Beaver Creek, Bridge Replacement 295,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $200,000) (Land Allocation - $30,000) (Design andContingencies - $65,000) (b) State Bridges (1) Various Bridges, Bridge Rehabilitation 1,000,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $900,000) (Design and Contingencies - $100,000) Section 6. Allegheny County. (a) Local Bridges (1) Emsworth Borough, Emsworth Bridge, Bridge Replacement 426,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $383,000) (Design and Contingencies - $43,000) (2) North BraddockBorough, Tassey Hollow Bridge, Bridge Replacement 1,100,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $990,000) (Design and Contingencies - $110,000) (3) Cityof Pittsburgh, Hot Metal Bridge, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge, Rehabilitation and Painting 6,938,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $6,038,000) (Design and Contingencies - $900,000) (4) Cityof Pittsburgh, West Ohio Street Bridge over Conrail, Bridge Rehabilitation 639,000 SESSION OF2002 Act 2002-223 1817 (Base Construction Allocation - $499,000) (Design and Contingencies - $140,000) (5) City of Pittsburgh, Davis Avenue Bridge, BridgeReplacement 3,800,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $3,320,000) (Design and Contingencies - $480,000) (6) City ofPittsburgh, Eliza Furnace Trail Bridge, Bridge Reconstruction 760,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $600,000) (Design and Contingencies - $160,000) (7) City of Pittsburgh, Larimer Avenue Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 3,800,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $3,000,000) (Design andContingencies - $800,000) (8) CityofPittsburgh, Ridge Avenue Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 3,210,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $2,850,000) (Design and Contingencies - $360,000) (9) City of Pittsburgh,Davis Avenue Bridge over Woods Run Avenue, Bridge Reconstruction 2,000,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $1,700,000) (Design andContingencies - $300,000) (10) City of Pittsburgh, Davis Avenue Bridge, Brighton Heights, Bridge Rehabilitation 2,500,000 (11) City ofPittsburgh, Wabash Bridge, New Bridge Construction 2,000,000 (12) City of Pittsburgh, Light Rail Transit, New Bridge Construction 2,000,000 (13) City of Pittsburgh, Bridge over 6th, 7th and 9th Streets, Bridge Rehabilitation 2,000,000 (14) Osborne Borough, Bridge over Railroad, NewBridge Construction 1,000,000 (15) Emsworth Borough, Bridge over Herron Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation 1,500,000 (16) Emsworth Borough, Gibson Street Bridge, BridgeRehabilitation 1,500,000 (17) Edgebrook Avenue Bridge, Bridge Replacement 2,500,000 (18) Coraopolis Borough, Clifton Mine/Coraopolis Heights Bridge, Bridge Replacement 2,000,000 (19) Crafton Borough, Blacks Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 2,000,000 (20) City of Pittsburgh,Ridge Avenue Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 3,210,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $2,850,000) (Design and Contingencies - $360,000) 1818 Act 2002-223 LAWS OF PENNSYLVANIA (21) Cityof Pittsburgh, Larimer Avenue Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 3,800,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $3,000,000) (Design and Contingencies - $800,000) (22) City of Pittsburgh, Eliza Furnace Trail Bridge, Bridge Reconstruction 760,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $600,000) (Design and Contingencies - $160,000) (23) City of Pittsburgh, Davis Avenue Bridge, Bridge Replacement 3,800,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $3,320,000) (Design and Contingencies - $480,000) (24) City of Pittsburgh, Hot Metal Bridge, Bridge Replacement 700,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $490,000) (Land Allocation - $70,000) (Design andContingencies - $140,000) (25) Whitaker Borough, Steel Valley Rail Trail Bridge, Bridge Replacement 600,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $420,000) (Land Allocation - $60,000) (Design and Contingencies - $120,000) (b) State Bridges (1) SR 2081, Bridge over Business US 22 in Monroeville, Monroeville Borough, Bridge Replacement 340,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $176,000) (Land Allocation - $56,000) (Design and Contingencies - $108,000) (2) 1-79, Neville Island Bridge No.2 over the Ohio River, Neville Township, BridgeRehabili- tation 1,220,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $1,060,000) (Land Allocation - $10,000) (Design and Contingencies - $150,000) (3) SR 1010, Bridge over Branch of Hart’s Run, Hampton Township, Bridge Replacement 146,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $106,000) (Land Allocation - $20,000) (Design and Contingencies - $20,000) (4) SR 2033, McClinton Road Bridge No.2 over a Small Stream, White Oak Borough, Bridge Rehabilitation 184,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $164,000) (Design and Contingencies - $20,000) SESSION OF 2002 Act2002-223 1819 (5) SR 0028,Bridge over Scout Reservation Road, Sharpsburg Borough, BridgeRehabilitation 302,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $260,000) (Land Allocation - $2,000) (Design and Contingencies - $40,000) (6) SR 0028, PA 28, North Main Street North- bound over Kittanning Pike, Sharpsburg Borough, Bridge Rehabilitation 524,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $480,000) (Land Allocation - $4,000) (Design and Contingencies - $40,000) (7) Various Bridges, BridgeRehabilitation 1,000,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $900,000) (Design and Contingencies - $100,000) (8) Saddle Pack Road Bridge over Pucketa Creek, Washington Township, BridgeReplacement 105,000 (Base Project Allocation - $70,000) (Land Allocation - $2,000) (Design and Contingencies - $33,000) (9) W. D, Mansfield Bridge (BMA 14) connecting Dravosburg and McKeesport over Monongahela River, Bridge Rehabilitation 25,000,000 (10) LibraryRoad Bridge, Bridge Replacement 2,500,000 (11) Birmingham Bridge, BridgeRehabilitation 2,500,000 (12) FlaughertyRun Bridge, BridgeRehabilitation 1,000,000 (13) Forest Grove Bridge, Kennedy Township, Bridge Replacement 2,000,000 (14) McKees Rocks Bridge, McKees Rocks Borough, BridgeRehabilitation 1,500,000 Section 7. ArmstrongCounty. (a) Local Bridges (1) Rayburn Township, T-507, Bridge over CowanshannockCreek, BridgeReplacement 159,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $123,000) (Land Allocation - $20,000) (Design andContingencies - $16,000) (2) CowanshannockTownship, BridgeNo.206 on T-722, Bridge Replacement 670,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $490,000) (Design andContingencies - $180,000) (3) CowanshannockTownship, Bridge No.207 on T-746, BridgeReplacement 750,000 (Base
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scranton Throop W 11 58 Jefferson
    MPMS# PROJECT: I-81 Detector System - Pittston to Clarks Summit 4 COUNTY: Lackawanna CATEGORY: ITS MUNICIPALITY: FUNCTIONAL CLASS: 11 S.R.: 0081 Segment: 1860 NHS: Yes DESCRIPTION: I-81 Pittston to Clarks Summit - Detector system at each interchange (2 detectors each direction = 4 X $30K each x 15 exits) PROJECT NEED: TRAFFIC FACILITY ENVIRONMENT COMMUNITY PROJECT PRIORITY Criteria 1: 3 AADT: 81716 Bridges Affected: 14 Wetland: Yes Comp Plan Zone: MDIA Criteria 2: 2 AATT: 15116 SD Bridge Present? N Streams: No Transit: Yes Criteria 3: 2 Truck %: 19 Min Sufficiency Rating: 51.8 Flood Plain: Yes EJ Pop: Yes Criteria 4: 2 2009 V/C: 0.93 Max Detour Length (miles): 99 Historic: Yes TUP Pop: Yes Criteria 5: 3 2030 V/C: 1.97 Min. IRI: 1 Section 4F: Yes Criteria 6: 2 524 TOTAL: 14 Crash DELTA: 0.59 Signals Affected: QR 0 Note: RANK: 54 ESTIMATED 2011-2014 2015-2016632 2017-2018 QR6322019-2022 2023-2030 TOTAL TIP QR DATES $0.00 $0.00 $3,800,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,800,000.00 Let: QR347 6 £11 ¤ 247QR 6 FUNDING SUMMARY ¤£ i Completion: r v e R 307 46 8006 aw na QR CLARKS N ck an SCOTT La ARCHBALD 307 SUMMIT O BLAKELY UV T D Y R A A H D L IELD 14 43 S Y NE RF 6 º L A A F G AV LOCATION ¤£ 34 R D O 62958 DICKSON 47 R T JESSUP ASSET MGMT E CITY S 57487 S N NEWTOND T I R ACRE A BRIDGE NEWT 200 M O L N 32 247 CMAQ B RD D 13 HILL 7912 L 80797 UV M M L R e E g CONNECTOR C O R g S k OLYPHANT U ert C ree H N A ENHANCEMENT URCH MILWA 8212 A HILL UK L D E M H R R ARS OO 247 SAFETY D E - 476 W QR R N R D TRANSIT O D ¨¦§ T SCRANTON THROOP W 11 58 JEFFERSON E £
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Susquehanna River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Study
    Final Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report Upper Susquehanna Comprehensive Flood Damage Reduction Study Prepared For: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Prepared By: Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service New York Field Office Cortland, New York Preparers: Anne Secord & Andy Lowell New York Field Office Supervisor: David Stilwell February 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Flooding in the Upper Susquehanna watershed of New York State frequently causes damage to infrastructure that has been built within flood-prone areas. This report identifies a suite of watershed activities, such as urban development, wetland elimination, stream alterations, and certain agricultural practices that have contributed to flooding of developed areas. Structural flood control measures, such as dams, levees, and floodwalls have been constructed, but are insufficient to address all floodwater-human conflicts. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is evaluating a number of new structural and non-structural measures to reduce flood damages in the watershed. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) is the “local sponsor” for this study and provides half of the study funding. New structural flood control measures that USACE is evaluating for the watershed largely consist of new levees/floodwalls, rebuilding levees/floodwalls, snagging and clearing of woody material from rivers and removing riverine shoals. Non-structural measures being evaluated include elevating structures, acquisition of structures and property, relocating at-risk structures, developing land use plans and flood proofing. Some of the proposed structural measures, if implemented as proposed, have the potential to adversely impact riparian habitat, wetlands, and riverine aquatic habitat. In addition to the alternatives currently being considered by the USACE, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway and Bridge Projects With
    Date: 5/28/20 3:53PM Page 1 of 74 Scranton/Wilke-Barre MPO TIP - Highway & Bridge Projects Lackawanna PennDOT Project Id: 7764 Project Administrator: PENNDOT Title: West Lackawanna Ave. Bridge over Conrail Railroad Improvement Type: Replace/Rehab State Route: 7302 Municipality: Scranton (CITY) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 8/22/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S19 - Widen narw. pave. or recon brdgs (No addtl lanes) Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Lackawanna County, City of Scranton, State Route 7302 (West Lackawanna Avenue) Project Description: Bridge rehabilitation/replacement on State Route 7302 (West Lackawanna Avenue) over Conrail Railroad in the City of Scranton, Lackawanna County. Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Final Design STU $0 $0 $120 $0 $0 $0 Final Design 185 $0 $0 $30 $0 $0 $0 Construction STU $0 $0 $0 $800 $0 $0 Construction 185 $0 $0 $0 $200 $0 $0 Federal: $0 $0 $120 $800 $0 $0 State: $0 $0 $30 $200 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $0 $0 $150 $1,000 $0 $0 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $1,150 PennDOT Project Id: 7911 Project Administrator: PENNDOT Title: North Main Avenue Bridge over Leggetts Creek Improvement Type: Replace/Rehab State Route: 7302 Municipality: Scranton (CITY) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 8/22/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S19 - Widen narw. pave. or recon brdgs (No addtl lanes) Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Lackawanna County, City of Scranton, North Main Avenue Bridge Project Description: Bridge rehabilitation/replacement on North Main Avenue Bridge over Leggetts Creek in the City of Scranton, Lackawanna County.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nanticoke Valley Historical Society of Maine, NY Presents
    The Nanticoke Valley Historical Society of Maine, NY Presents: An Introduction to the Baldwin Family of Nanticoke, NY The Who, What, Why and Where of the Town of Nanticoke, NY June 21, 2021 “When the township of Lisle was set off from Union in 1801, Nanticoke went with it and remained a part of that township until April 18, 1831, when by an act of the Legislature a new township to be known thereafter as Nanticoke, an Indian name, was erected. In compliance with the act establishing the township, the first town meeting was held at the house of Philip Councilman” Seward, William Foote 1829 1855 Map of Nanticoke “The only villages in the town of Nanticoke are Glen Aubrey and Nanticoke. These hamlets grew YEAR POP. up around lumber and flour mills, and as long as the deep 1835 295 forests in the township afforded 1850 576 material, people continued to 1860 797 collect about them. The time 1870 1058 came, however, when the 1880 999 timber supply was practically 1890 728 exhausted, the mills fell into 1900 666 decay and population deteriorated. We shall be 1910 536 , interested in following the 1920 444 figures which record this 2010 1672 gradual decay.” Seward, William 2018 1591 Foote Lamb’s Corners Glen Aubrey General Timeline Referring to Some Facts Concerning Nanticoke NY – Starting 1700 -1921 Prior to 1700 the New York State region was the home to the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois and the Algonquian tribes) which formed an alliance called the Five Nations (Cayuga, Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga and Seneca) The Tuscarora joined later and it began the Six Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Suppl to DES for Facilities
    8005010 ) Q3 NU RE G-0564 ')lit ll Draft Supplement to the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTALSTATEMENT related to operation of SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 PENNSYLVANIAPOWER AND LIGHTCOMPANY ALLEGHENYELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50388 Published: March 1980 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, D.C. Docket g m~97 f"o"f,.oIe 8-m S-Smi &C ': '.~s REGULATORYDOCKET FILE NVREG-O56O 'MARCH 1980 DRAFT SUPPLEMENT TO THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT BY THE U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FOR SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 proposed by PENNSYLVANIA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY- ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388 I SUMMARY ANQ CONCLUSIONS This Supplement to the Qraft Environmental Statement was prepared by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Corrmission (NRC), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (the staff). 1. The action is administrative. 2. The proposed action is the issuance of construction permits by local, state, and federal agencies (including the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, SRBC) for the construction of a water storage reservoir in the Pond Hill Creek drainage basin. The proposed site is located on a small tributary of the Susquehanna River in Conyngham Township, Luzerne ,County, Pennsylvania. The site is approximately 11 km northeast of the borough of Berwick, Pennsylvania, and about 3.7 km northeast of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), now under construction. The purpose of the proposed reservoir is to supply water to the Susquehanna River during periods of low riverflow to replace the water consumptively used by SSES.
    [Show full text]
  • July 24, 2004 (Pages 3853-4004)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 34 (2004) Repository 7-24-2004 July 24, 2004 (Pages 3853-4004) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2004 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "July 24, 2004 (Pages 3853-4004)" (2004). Volume 34 (2004). 30. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2004/30 This July is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 34 (2004) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 34 Number 30 Saturday, July 24, 2004 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 3853—4004 Agencies in this issue: The Courts Department of Agriculture Department of Banking Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Environmental Hearing Board Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Liquor Control Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Philadelphia Regional Port Authority Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 356, July 2004 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents). Subscription rate $82.00 per year, postpaid to points in the United States. Individual copies $2.50.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Broome State Forests Unit Management Plan
    Broome State Forests UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT Broome County Towns of Sanford, Windsor, Vestal and Kirkwood and the Tioga County Town of Owego August 2020 DIVISION OF LANDS AND FORESTS Bureau of State Land Management, Region 7 2715 State Highway 80 Sherburne, New York 13460 607-674-4036 www.dec.ny.gov DRAFT BROOME STATE FORESTS UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN COVERING EIGHT STATE FORESTS IN BROOME AND TIOGA COUNTIES, NY: HAWKINS POND – BROOME R.A. # 3 MARSH POND – BROOME R.A. #4 SKYLINE DRIVE – BROOME # 5 CASCADE VALLEY – BROOME # 6 BEAVER POND – BROOME #7 WHITAKER SSWAMP – BROOME #8 CAT HOLLOW – BROOME #9 TRACY CREEK – BROOME-TIOGA #1 Prepared By: Christopher Sprague, Supervising Forester, Team Leader Andrew Blum, Senior Forester New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Lands & Forests Office 2715 State Highway 80 Sherburne, New York 13460 607-674-4036 Contributing Staff: Paul Giachetti, Mineral Resources Randy Ortleib, Operations Field Supervisor Barb Small, Operations 1 DEC’s Mission "The quality of our environment is fundamental to our concern for the quality of life. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the State of New York to conserve, improve and protect its natural resources and environment and to prevent, abate and control water, land and air pollution, in order to enhance the health, safety and welfare of the people of the state and their overall economic and social well-being." - Environmental Conservation Law 1-0101(1) * Highlighted (bold) terms are defined in the Glossary. Vision Statement State Forests on the Unit Name Unit (unit acronym, if commonly used) will be managed in a sustainable manner by promoting ecosystem health, enhancing landscape biodiversity, protecting soil productivity and water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Luzerne County, PA
    Earth Conservancy South Valley Corridor Lands, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania DRAFT FINAL REUSE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINABLE REDEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Through support provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the SRA Team (SRA International, Inc. and Vita Nuova) conducted several research tasks to develop a regional analysis to support potential development of Earth Conservancy property. The SRA Team conducted a regional analysis to identify opportunities and constraints and to present a regional framework which would support redevelopment of the South Valley Corridor lands owned by Earth Conservancy. In addition, the SRA Team developed preliminary draft development concepts to showcase redevelopment opportunities which are supported by the regional market as well as the site location and opportunities. This analysis is one component of a comprehensive project to understand the economic history and trends of the region, market competition and potential for the area, and physical opportunities and constraints of the site. This analysis will 1) help the Earth Conservancy Board of Directors make informed decisions regarding the implementation of the 1999 Master Plan and the phasing of development and 2) provide the preliminary data and analysis from which developers/investors will make decisions. The following analysis reviews the greater Scranton/Wilkes-Barre/Hazleton, PA Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) region for economic history and trends and market competition. The market potential focuses on the viability of developing the South Valley Corridor lands in the Wyoming Valley. This information was collected through qualitative (regional visit, interviews) and quantitative (data searches) approaches. PROJECT LOCATION/STUDY AREA AND PRINCIPLES The area considered in the reuse planning framework includes areas of the City of Nanticoke, Hanover Township, and Newport Township of the Wyoming Valley, which runs northeast to southwest in eastern Pennsylvania and which includes the cities of Scranton and Wilkes-Barre.
    [Show full text]