DOCSLIB.ORG

Schools Forum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schools Forum Total Membership 25 The Forum is quorate if at least 40% (10) of the members are present London Borough of Waltham Forest SCHOOLS FORUM Day/Date/Time Venue Wednesday 18th January 2018 Council Chambers, 1st Floor, Waltham Forest Tea/Coffee and Light Refreshments: 5:00pm Town Hall Forest Road Walthamstow E17 4JF Main Meeting: 5:30pm Contact: Telephone / Email: Zoey Quinn [email protected] Clerk to Schools Forum Maintained Primary Headteacher Representatives (4) Jane Harris Edinburgh Primary Kate Jennings Mission Grove Lindsey Lampard Chingford CofE Primary Linda Adair Henry Maynard Primary School and Nursery Primary Academies and Primary Free Schools Representatives (4) Maureen Okoye (Vice-Chair) Davies Lane Primary Academy & Selwyn Primary Lynne Harrowell Larkswood Primary Academy Anne Powell Riverley Primary Amanda Daoud Larkswood / Lime Trust Maintained Primary Governor Representatives (3) Cllr Aktar Beg Edinburgh Primary Thomas Goodall Edinburgh Primary Ruth Boon St Joseph Nursery School Representative (1) Helen Currie Church Hill Nursery School and Children’s Centre & Low Hall Nursery School and Children’s Centre Maintained Secondary Headteacher Representatives (3) Grainne Smyth Leytonstone School Lynnette Parvez Kelmscott School Shona Ramsay (Chair) The Lammas School Secondary Academies and Secondary Free Schools Representatives (3) Mark Morrall Rushcroft / Chingford Foundation Gareth Cross Connaught School for Girls Rob Pittard Norlington School for Boys Maintained Secondary Governor Representative (1) Ian Moyes Heathcote School Special School and Special Academies Representative (1) Gary Pocock Hornbeam Academy PRU(1) Julian Lee Hawkswood Group Non School Members (4) Early Years Providers Sarah Kendrick (Redwood Pre-School) 16-19 Providers Penny Wycherley (Waltham Forest College) Trade Unions Steve White (NUT) Diocesan Moira Bishop (Brentwood Diocese) Total Membership 25 The Forum is quorate if at least 40% (10) of the members are present AGENDA Agenda Report Name Report Authors Item 1. Welcome all and Apologies Chair 2. Declaration of Interest All 3. Minutes of the Meeting held on 6th December Chair 2018 3a Decision Sheet Chair / Duncan James-Pike 3b Matters Arising Chair / Duncan James-Pike 4. Early Years Funding Block : Early Years Task and Eve McLoughlin Finish Group consultation proposals regarding free education for 2, 3 and 4 year olds for 2018- 19 5. Local Funding Formula 2018-19: Indicative Budget Duncan James-Pike Shares 6. Growth Fund 2018-19 Update Duncan James-Pike 7. Any Other Business All 8. Date of Next Meeting: All Wednesday 21st February 2018 5:30pm (Light refreshments from 5:00pm) Council Chambers, Waltham Forest Town Hall Schools Forum - 6 December 2017 MINUTES OF SCHOOLS FORUM MEETING Wednesday 6 December 2017 Venue, Waltham Forest Town Hall 5:30 – 7:00pm ATTENDEES Deborah Chapman Clerk to Schools Forum [email protected] 020 8496 8279 Maintained Primary Headteacher Representatives (5) Jane Harris Edinburgh Primary Kate Jennings Mission Grove (represented by AJ Byleveldt, St Joseph Catholic Infants ) Linda Adair Henry Maynard Primary School and Nursery Lindsey Lampard Chingford CofE Primary (not present) Ruth Boon St Joseph Catholic Infants Maintained Primary Governor Representatives (2) Cllr Akhtar Beg Edinburgh Primary (not present) Thomas Goodall Edinburgh Primary (not present, apologies received*) Primary Academies and Primary Free Schools Representatives (4) Amanda Daoud Lime Trust / Larkswood Anne Powell Riverley Primary Academy Lynne Harrowell Larkswood Primary Academy Maureen Okoye (Vice-Chair) Davies Lane Primary Academy & Selwyn Primary Academy Nursery School Representative (1) Helen Currie* Church Hill & Low Hall Nursery Schools and Children’s Centres (not present, apologies received*) Maintained Secondary Headteacher Representatives (3) Grainne Smyth Leytonstone School Lynnette Parvez Kelmscott School Shona Ramsay (Chair) The Lammas School and Sixth Form Schools Forum - 6 December 2017 Maintained Secondary Governor Representative (1) Ian Moyes Heathcote School (not present) Secondary Academies and Secondary Free School Representatives (3) Mark Morrall Rushcroft / Chingford Foundation Gareth Cross Connaught School for Girls Rob Pittard Norlington School and Sixth Form Special School and Special Academies Representative (1) Gary Pocock* Hornbeam Academy (not present, apologies received*) PRU (1) Julian Lee Hawkswood Group Non-School Representatives (4) Sarah Kendrick Redwood Pre-School – Early Years Provider Steve White Trade Unions (NUT) Penny Wycherley Waltham Forest College representing the 16-19 Providers Sector Moira Bishop Diocesan LBWF Officers Duncan James-Pike Strategic Finance Advisor – Children and Young People Services Raina Turner Head of Finance Families Group (Schools and Education Services) Andrew Beckett Director Disability Enablement Service Eve McLoughlin Head of Education Support David Kilgallon Director of Learning & Systems Leadership Stuart Petrie Head of Human Resources Gerry Kemble Head of WF Traded Services Michael Hallick High Needs Accountant Observers Shermaine Lewis Frederick Bremer School Mary Arthur LB Waltham Forest Fiona Davey Educational Psychologist Lindsay Jackson LB Waltham Forest Schools Forum - 6 December 2017 Phil Grundy Highams Park School Summaya Aziz Highams Park School Kath Wheeler Buxton School Graham Jackson Willowfield School Apologies *Thomas Goodall Edinburgh Primary *Helen Currie Church Hill & Low Hall Nursery Schools and Children’s Centres *Gary Pocock Hornbeam Academy Linzi Roberts-Egan Deputy Chief Executive (Families) Schools Forum - 6 December 2017 Minutes 1 Welcome all and Apologies The Chair welcomed all to the meeting Apologies are noted in the table at the beginning of these minutes. The Chair stated that there is a change of order in regard to the agenda and the Early Years Block report 2018-2019 (item 10) will now be the first item on the agenda. 2 Declaration of Interest There were no declarations of interest. 3 Minutes of the last meeting held on Wednesday 8th November 2017 The minutes were agreed as an accurate record of the meeting. 3.1 Matters Arising There were no matters arising 10 Early Years Block report 2018 - 2019 10.1 This report set out the proposed plan for the development of the early years funding formula for free education payments for 2, 3 and 4 year olds for 2018- 2019. 10.2 The Schools Forum unanimously agreed to the recommendations laid out in section 2 of the report. 4 Local Funding Formula 2018 - 2019 4.1 This report set out five key decisions for Schools Forum to make in agreeing whether to mandate the Local Authority (LA) to make changes to the local funding formula. 4.2 These decisions required Schools Forum to consider the balance to be struck between the principles of fairness and stability. 4.3 Questions and Comments 4.3.1 Comment: It was noted that, under the current local funding model, one small primary school (St Joseph’s Catholic Infant School), is contributing significantly more than the other schools to the cost of the MFG. Schools Forum - 6 December 2017 4.3.2 Comment: It was noted that we do not know how long St Joseph’s have been in the position where they are contributing a disproportional amount of money to the MFG and how it has risen over a period of time, however it must be addressed. 4.3.3 Question: It is difficult to relate this to the pink chart on Appendix C2. Within all the variations it is 3% for St Joseph’s but for others it is 1% so does not give a spread of the actual costs. 4.3.4 Answer: if it is 2% we would be bringing a lot more schools into the MFG. This would ensure the there is a more even spread of contributions across the contributing schools. 4.3.5 Question: Looking at the percentages put forward in the suggested models, St Joseph’s still loses the most so it is still the same amount of money but it is spread more. On the one hand you have a more equitable distribution but is it already affected by falling rolls in schools? 4.3.6 Answer: This is not about falling rolls in schools. This comes from the other pupil-led funding such as deprivation and lower prior attainment. LFF is trying to target need but this is constrained by the MFG. 4.3.7 Question: Is it possible to clarify what it is that has changed in the schools which would explain the big savings in contribution or income? 4.3.8 Answer: This can be reported back to the Schools Forum but not before the need to make a decision tonight. 4.3.9 Comment: It was agreed to take each of the five decisions in turn and before a vote is made on each one the Schools Forum will be given the opportunity to raise any matters of concern. 4.3.10 Schools Forum noted the contents of the report. 4.4 Vote on the decisions which are listed in section 2 of the report 4.4.1 Comment: Not sure of the difference between 0% and 0.5% and 1%. I want to look at one that has the least impact on schools. 0% has the least impact and it spreads the burden on schools the most. 4.4.2 Comment: a member of Schools Forum put forward the following alternative suggestion regarding the Gains Scale: When looking at the models and the impact of the 3% and 5% limit, it still means that there is a disproportionate impact on a particular school. If we were to look at the last column on its own, we could identify it does still have a disproportionate impact on one school but it should be proportionate. Could it be a maximum of 1% contribution? Schools Forum - 6 December 2017 4.4.3 Answer: If we were to do this, we would need to adjust the gains scale to ensure more schools contributed. 4.4.4 This proposal was added to recommendation 2.1.5 as a new option (a). 4.4.5 Recommendations and voting Make the following changes to the Local Funding Formula factors: 4.4.6 (a) Add any increase in funding to APWU: 7 votes (b) Increase Primary lump sum by £10,000 and add any remaining increase in funding to AWPU: 10 votes 4.4.7 Adjust the IDACI ladder to better reflect relative levels of deprivation: Votes for 15; Votes against 0; 3 abstentions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Admission Authorities in Waltham Forest
    Appeal Information for Parents 2016/2017 Local Authority (LA) Community Schools For all LA Community Schools and Chingford CofE Primary School the admission authority is the London Borough of Waltham Forest. If you wish to appeal for a place at one of the schools, for which your application was unsuccessful, please contact the School Admissions Service on the number below. Appeals forms and guidance can be obtained by emailing [email protected] or, if you wish to see an officer, please contact the School Admissions Service, on 020 8496 3000 to make an appointment at Sycamore House, Walthamstow Town Hall Complex, Forest Road, London, E17 4DF. The closing date for receipt of appeals is 16 May 2016. Late applicants, please contact us. Trust School Buxton School (Primary Phase) The Governors of the school are the admissions authority. However, the LA is administering the appeals process for the school this year and the process and timetable are described for LA community Schools above. All-Through Community School George Mitchell School The Governors of the school are the admissions authority. However the LA is administering the appeals process for the school this year and the process and timetable are described for LA community schools above. Academies Barclay Primary School, Chingford Hall Primary School, Hillyfield Primary Academy, Larkswood Primary Academy, Riverley Primary School, Roger Ascham Primary School, Sybourn Primary School, Woodside Primary Academy, Thomas Gamuel Primary School, Walthamstow Primary Academy, Whittingham Primary School and Willow Brook Primary School Academy. The Governors of these schools are the admission authority. However the LA is administering the appeals process for these schools this year and the process and timetable are described for LA community schools above.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary to Secondary Ontime & Late Offers 2019.Xlsx
    Year 7 September 2019 'On Time Late' Offers Information @ 26/02/2019 Primary to Secondary Transition for September 2019 Entry - National Offer Day On Time & Late Applicants Total On Time & Late Offers - Newham and Out Borough Residents Newham On-Line Applications: 4545 Newham Paper Applications: 86 Places LA Total Offers Out Admission Year 6 All Over Actual On Time First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Remaining Newham Establishment Cap Bulge Class Alternative & Borough Boys Girls Number Through Allocation Places Preferences Preference Preference Preference Preference Preference Preference Before Late Pupils Allocation Allocations Pupils Apps Bobby Moore Academy 180 0 0 0 0 180 564 102 46 23 6 2 1 0 180 0 94 86 113 67 Brampton Manor Academy 300 0 0 0 90 390 2797 376 10 2 1 0 1 0 390 0 387 3 214 176 Chobham Academy 180 0 -90 0 24 114 1091 94 16 3 0 1 0 0 114 0 74 40 67 47 The Cumberland School 300 0 0 0 30 330 619 89 55 16 8 1 2 159 330 0 323 7 155 175 East London Science School 120 0 0 0 5 125 505 65 25 20 9 4 2 0 125 0 94 31 79 46 Eastlea Community School 240 0 0 0 0 240 277 97 17 7 6 4 1 110 242 -2 237 5 101 141 Eleanor Smith School N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 1 0 1 0 Forest Gate Community School 210 0 0 60 0 270 1283 242 16 10 1 1 0 0 270 0 261 9 163 107 John F Kennedy Special School N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 N/A 9 0 6 3 Kingsford Community School 330 0 0 0 30 360 770 184 109 37 10 8 2 10 360 0 349 11 193 167 Langdon Academy 360 0 -81 0 0 279 893 147 104 17 15 1 2 0 286 -7 280 6 183 103 Lister Community
    [Show full text]
  • Barclay Secondary Free School
    Free school application form 2014 Mainstream and 16 to 19 (updated August 2014) BARCLAY SECONDARY FREE SCHOOL Barclay Secondary Free School Application October 2014.docx Lion Academy Trust 1 Contents Declaration ..................................................................................................................5 Section A: Applicant details .........................................................................................6 Section B: Outline of the school ..................................................................................6 Section C: Education vision.........................................................................................7 Section D – Education Plan Part 1 ............................................................................ 16 Section D: Education plan – part 2 ............................................................................ 18 Section D1: the curriculum plan ................................................................................ 20 D2 Measuring Performance and setting targets ........................................................ 49 Section D3: staffing ................................................................................................... 55 Section E: Evidence of need – part 1 ........................................................................ 63 Section E: Evidence of need – part 2 ........................................................................ 64 Section E: Evidence of need – Part 2 - Successful Engagement with the community
    [Show full text]
  • Arts Award & Beyond
    Arts Award & Beyond... Developing Creative Opportunities for Young People across Waltham Forest Report of current provision with Project Action Plan By Laura Elliott, Project Consultant and Coordinator November 2013 – March 2014 CONTENTS Acknowledgements i Explanation of key organisations and terms ii Executive summary iv Project Action Plan vii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 About the report 1 1.2 Research methodology 1 1.3 Report aims and objectives 2 2. Key findings and recommendations 3 2.1 Identify existing arts provision for young people aged 14-25 3 2.2 Identify main structures of communication for arts providers 7 2.3 Provide an overview of the organisation of work experience, apprenticeships and volunteering 9 2.4 Identify the main benefits of Arts Award to education providers 10 2.5 Identify the main incentives and barriers to participation 12 2.6 Identify and encourage new partner organisations able to engage young people not currently participating in the arts 15 2.7 Summary of the full recommendations with action points 16 3. Project Action Plan up to March 2014 17 3.1 Project milestones 18 4 Conclusion 19 Sources 20 Appendices 21 Appendix i: Table of Arts Award and Artsmark activity in schools 21 Appendix ii: List of Waltham Forest education, youth and arts organisations working with young people aged 16-25 22 Appendix iii: Waltham Forest schools networks 26 a) Table of Waltham Forest Area Partnerships 25 b) List of Waltham Forest Schools Networks 26 c) Case Studies of information networks used by two WFAEN member schools 28 Appendix iv: Survey and consultation results 29 Appendix v: Sample of questionnaire 30 Appendix vi: Consultation exercise and notes 33 a) Barriers and benefits 33 b) Next steps: Communication 35 c) Next steps: Work experience 36 Cover illustration: Students from Chingford Foundation School displaying relief prints completed during a workshop at the William Morris Gallery attended as part of their Bronze Arts Award.
    [Show full text]
  • Bold Beginnings
    Bold beginnings: The Reception curriculum in a sample of good and outstanding primary schools In January 2017, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector (HMCI) commissioned an Ofsted-wide review of the curriculum. Its aim was to provide fresh insight into leaders’ curriculum intentions, how these are implemented and the impact on outcomes for pupils. This report shines a spotlight on the Reception Year and the extent to which a school’s curriculum for four- and five-year-olds prepares them for the rest of their education and beyond. 2 Bold beginnings – November 2017, No. 170045 Contents Executive summary 4 Key findings 5 Recommendations 7 Reception – a unique and important year 8 The curriculum 12 Teaching 16 Language and literacy 19 Mathematics 24 Assessment and the early years foundation stage profile 26 Initial teacher education 29 Methodology 31 Annex A: Schools visited 32 Annex B: Online questionnaire 34 3 www.gov.uk/ofsted Executive summary A good early education is the foundation for later supposed to teach it. This seemed to stem from success. For too many children, however, their misinterpreting what the characteristics of effective Reception Year is a missed opportunity that can leave learning in the early years foundation stage (EYFS)2 – them exposed to all the painful and unnecessary ‘playing and exploring, active learning, and creating consequences of falling behind their peers. and thinking critically’ – required in terms of the curriculum they provided. During the summer term 2017, Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) visited successful primary schools The EYFS profile (EYFSP)3 is a mechanism for statutory in which children, including those from disadvantaged summative assessment at the end of the foundation backgrounds1, achieved well.
    [Show full text]
  • Bold Beginnings: the Reception Curriculum in A
    Bold beginnings: The Reception curriculum in a sample of good and outstanding primary schools In January 2017, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector (HMCI) commissioned an Ofsted-wide review of the curriculum. Its aim was to provide fresh insight into leaders’ curriculum intentions, how these are implemented and the impact on outcomes for pupils. This report shines a spotlight on the Reception Year and the extent to which a school’s curriculum for four- and five-year-olds prepares them for the rest of their education and beyond. 2 Bold beginnings – November 2017, No. 170045 Contents Executive summary 4 Key findings 5 Recommendations 7 Reception – a unique and important year 8 The curriculum 12 Teaching 16 Language and literacy 19 Mathematics 24 Assessment and the early years foundation stage profile 26 Initial teacher education 29 Methodology 31 Annex A: Schools visited 32 Annex B: Online questionnaire 34 3 www.gov.uk/ofsted Executive summary A good early education is the foundation for later supposed to teach it. This seemed to stem from success. For too many children, however, their misinterpreting what the characteristics of effective Reception Year is a missed opportunity that can leave learning in the early years foundation stage (EYFS)2 – them exposed to all the painful and unnecessary ‘playing and exploring, active learning, and creating consequences of falling behind their peers. and thinking critically’ – required in terms of the curriculum they provided. During the summer term 2017, Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) visited successful primary schools The EYFS profile (EYFSP)3 is a mechanism for statutory in which children, including those from disadvantaged summative assessment at the end of the foundation backgrounds1, achieved well.
    [Show full text]
  • Pupils Who Sat the Test
    Exam Venue Exam Venue Total Outside of Redbridge 45 Ilford County High School 1124 Woodford County High School 1091 Grand Total 2260 Month of Birth Month of Birth WCHS ICHS Grand Total January 105 92 197 February 84 90 174 March 92 87 179 April 90 108 198 May 113 87 200 June 66 94 160 July 106 86 192 August 87 84 171 September 92 106 198 October 107 119 226 Novebmer 83 90 173 December 96 96 192 Grand Total 1121 1139 2260 Score Score ICHS WCHS Grand Total Scored less that 104 720 635 1355 Scored 104 or more 419 486 905 Grand Total 1139 1121 2260 Common Catchment Area Common Catchment Area WCHS ICHS Grand Total In CCA 907 915 1822 Out CCA 214 224 438 Grand Total 1121 1139 2260 Home to School Distance Distance WCHS ICHS Grand Total Under 1/2 mile 5 27 32 Between 1/2 and 1 mile 32 95 127 Between 1 and 2 miles 106 184 290 Between 2 and 5 miles 561 636 1197 Over 5 miles 417 197 614 Grand Total 1121 1139 2260 Home Local Authority Home LA WCHS ICHS Grand Total Barking & Dagenham 78 98 176 Barnet Less than 5 Less than 5 Bedford Borough Less than 5 Less than 5 Bexley Less than 5 Less than 5 Birmingham Less than 5 Less than 5 Bracknell Forest Borough Less than 5 Less than 5 Buckinghamshire County Less than 5 Less than 5 Less than 5 City of Westminster Less than 5 Less than 5 Coventry Less than 5 Less than 5 Ealing Less than 5 Less than 5 Less than 5 Enfield 8 Less than 5 11 Essex 47 24 71 Greenwich Less than 5 Less than 5 Hackney 5 Less than 5 8 Hampshire Less than 5 Less than 5 Haringey Less than 5 Less than 5 Harrow Less than 5 Less than 5 Less
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Waltham Forest Admission Arrangements 2018/19
    Waltham Forest Determined Admission Arrangements 2021/2022 1 Background In accordance with The School Admissions (Admission Arrangements and Co- ordination of Admission Arrangements) (England) Regulations 2012, admission authorities are required to determine their admission arrangements each year. London Borough Waltham Forest is the admission authority for all community and voluntary controlled schools within the borough. The admission arrangements for all schools must be determined in advance of the academic year to which they are relevant. For the academic year 2021/22, all admission authorities must have determined their arrangements by 28 February 2020. What are admission arrangements? Admission arrangements are the overall procedure, practices and oversubscription criteria used in deciding the allocation of school places. It describes the full set of arrangements on how a school will admit pupils. This includes the published admission number (the maximum number of pupils intended to be admitted to the relevant year group), the oversubscription criteria and information on waiting lists. Primary School Admissions Pan London Co- No changes ordinated scheme Admissions criteria Mini catchment removed from the distance criterion for Gwyn Jones Primary School, The Jenny Hammond Primary School and Coppermill Primary School Admission numbers for community and voluntary controlled primary schools Other changes No changes Secondary School Admissions Pan London co- No changes ordinated scheme 2 Admissions criteria No changes Admission No changes numbers for community secondary schools Other changes No changes In- Year School Admissions In-year admissions No changes scheme 3 Pan London co-ordinated scheme - Arrangements for Primary Transfer The relatively high level of applications to schools outside of the child’s home Local Authority (LA) in the London region mean there is a need to co-ordinate admissions on a Pan-London basis across the 33 London authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • MGLA260719-8697 Date
    Our ref: MGLA260719-8697 Date: 22 August 2018 Dear Thank you for your request for information which the GLA received on 26 June 2019. Your request has been dealt with under the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR) 2004. Our response to your request is as follows: 1. Please provide the precise number and list of locations/names of primary and secondary schools in London where air pollution breaches legal limit, according to your most recent data (I believe the same metric has been used across the years, of annual mean limit of 40ug/m3 NO2, but please clarify). If you are able to provide more recent data without breaching the s12 time limit please do. If not, please provide underlying data from May 2018 (see below). Please provide as a spreadsheet with school name, pollution level, and any location information such as borough. This data is available on the London datastore. The most recent available data is from the London Atmospheric Emission Inventory (LAEI) 2016 and was published in April 2019. The data used for the 2018 report is LAEI 2013. Please find attached a list and a summary of all Educational Establishments in London and NO2 levels based on both the LAEI 2013 update and LAEI 2016. The list has been taken from the register of educational establishments in England and Wales, maintained by the Department for Education, and provides information on establishments providing compulsory, higher and further education. It was downloaded on 21/03/2019, just before the release of the LAEI 2016. The attached spreadsheet has recently been published as part of the LAEI 2016 stats on Datastore here.
    [Show full text]
  • Schools Forum
    Total Membership 25 The Forum is quorate if at least 40% (10) of the members are present London Borough of Waltham Forest SCHOOLS FORUM Day/Date/Time Venue Wednesday 13 February 2019 Council Chambers, 1st Floor, Waltham Forest Tea/Coffee and Light Refreshments: 5:00pm Town Hall Forest Road Walthamstow E17 4JF Main Meeting: 5:30pm Contact: Telephone / Email: Clerk to Schools Forum [email protected] Maintained Primary Headteacher Representatives (4) Jane Harris Edinburgh Primary Kate Jennings Mission Grove Lindsey Lampard Chingford CofE Primary Linda Adair Henry Maynard Primary School and Nursery Ruth Boon St Joseph’s Infants Primary Academies and Primary Free Schools Representatives (4) Amanda Daoud Lime Trust Larkswood Anne Powell Riverley Primary Lynne Harrowell Lime Trust Larkswood Maureen Okoye (Vice-Chair) Davies Lane Primary Academy & Selwyn Primary Maintained Primary Governor Representatives (1) Aktar Beg Edinburgh Primary Nursery School Representative (1) Helen Currie Church Hill and Low Hall Nursery Schools and Children’s Centres Maintained Secondary Headteacher Representatives (3) Grainne Smyth Leytonstone School Lynnette Parvez Kelmscott School Secondary Academies and Secondary Free Schools Representatives (4) Gareth Cross Connaught School for Girls Mark Morrall Rushcroft / Chingford Foundation Rob Pittard Norlington School for Boys Vacant Maintained Secondary Governor Representative (1) Gillian Barker Walthamstow School for Girls Special School and Special Academies Representative (1) Gary Pocock Hornbeam Academy PRU(1) Catherine Davis Hawkswood Group Non School Members (4) Early Years Providers Sarah Kendrick (Redwood Pre-School) 16-19 Providers Joy Kettyle (Waltham Forest College) Trade Unions Steve White (NEU) Diocesan Moira Bishop (Brentwood Diocese) 1 Total Membership 25 The Forum is quorate if at least 40% (10) of the members are present AGENDA Agenda Report Name Report Authors Item 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Burton Upon Trent School Planning Study Part 1
    The Burton upon Trent School Planning Study Part 1 Managing demographic growth and increasing education opportunities October 2013 Staffordshire County & East Staffordshire Borough Councils The Burton upon Trent School Planning Study Part 1 323137 BPI MBS P1 D 323137/PK/PW/TB 24 October 2013 TheManaging Burton upon demographic Trent School Planning growth Study Part 1 Managingand increasing demographic education growth and increasingopportunities education opportunities October 2013 Staffordshire County & East Staffordshire Borough Councils Staffordshire County Council Number 1, Staffordshire Place Stafford, ST16 2LP East Staffordshire Borough Council The Maltsters, Wetmore Road Burton upon Trent, DE14 1LS Cambridge Education, Demeter House, Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2RS, United Kingdom T +44 (0)1223 463500 F +44 (0)1223 461007 W www.camb-ed.com The Burton upon Trent School Planning Study Part 1 Managing demographic growth and increasing education opportunities Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description Standard Part 1-D 26/10/13 PW/PK TB/FG TB This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project document being relied upon by any other party, or being used only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Has Been Withdrawn the Targeted Basic Need Programme Formally Closed in September 2015
    This document has been withdrawn The Targeted Basic Need programme formally closed in September 2015 Expected number of Local Authority Application places to be provided by LAs Barking and Dagenham Barking Abbey School, A Specialist Sports and Humanities College 750 Barking and Dagenham Eastbury Comprehensive School 446 Barking and Dagenham Robert Clack School 900 Barnet London Academy 420 Barnet New School, Barnet [HA8 9YA] 420 Barnet Osidge Primary School 210 Barnet St Joseph's RC Junior School and St Joseph's RC Infant School 210 Barnet Wren Academy 420 Bedford Castle Lower School 60 Bedford Shackleton Lower School 210 Birmingham Baskerville School 57 Birmingham Cherry Oak School 10 Birmingham Mayfield School 10 Birmingham Queensbury School 10 Birmingham Selly Oak Trust School 8 Birmingham The Dame Ellen Pinsent School 10 Birmingham The Pines Special School 21 Blackburn with Darwen Roe Lee Park Primary School 70 Bolton Green Fold School 24 Bournemouth Avonbourne School 420 Bournemouth Christ The King Catholic Primary School 210 Bracknell Forest Garth Hill College 350 Bracknell Forest Kennel Lane School 56 Bracknell Forest Owlsmoor Primary School 98 Bracknell Forest Winkfield St Mary's CofE Primary School 30 Bradford Chellow Heights Special School 35 Bradford Cullingworth Village Primary School 105 Bradford New School, Bradford [BD4 8QW] 1050 Bradford Princeville Primary School 215 Brent Islamia Primary School 210 Brent Manor School 44 Brent New Special School, Brent [Fulton Road] 60 Brent The Stonebridge School 30 Brighton and Hove
    [Show full text]