DOCSLIB.ORG

How Much a Superhead Costs Us

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Much a Superhead Costs Us revealed: bye-bye academies: workload baseline battle or principles tests baulk? Pages 15 & 24 Page 10 Page 3 SCHOOLSWEEK.CO.UK FRIDAY, APRIL 15, 2016 | EDITION 63 PA/WIRE See page 8 and 9 66 76 How much (10%) (11%) 208 a superhead (31%) TOTAL 672 322 costs us all (48%) 18 LAURA MCINERNEY Exclusive @MISS_MCINERNEY OFSTED: THE SPRING TERM £100k (at least), but results dip when they go Fewer schools inspected, but what £11.8 million to ‘clean up the mess’ “Superheads” recruited to quickly turn plummeting scores and financial black did they get? around failing schools boost results in holes when they leave a few years later, the short term but leave schools with a new study shows. See page 7 THE FESTIVAL OF SUMMER 2016 Over 150 speakers now confirmed. JUNE 23-24, 2016 @EDUCATIONFEST FESTIVALOFEDUCATION.COM 2 @SCHOOLSWEEK SCHOOLS WEEK FRIDAY, APRIL 15, 2016 EDITION 63 NEWS SCHOOLS WEEK TEAM You can be free of chains, says Morgan Editor: Laura McInerney FREDDIE WHITTAKER he feared the promise would not protect the majority of primary schools. Deputy editor: Cath Murray @FCDWHITTAKER “I don’t think Nicky Morgan’s promise Head designer: Nicky Phillips Successful schools will not be forced to join is worth very much, because of the Designer: Russell Hardman multi-academy trusts, Nicky Morgan has qualification [she made] about schools confirmed, but they will have to start one or being ‘capable of operating alone’. Designer: Zuleika Testone provide support to weaker institutions. “That won’t apply to the vast majority of Sub editor: Jill Craven However, a qualification made by the primary schools… so [the government] will education secretary that this will only be for want them in a trust.” Senior reporter: Sophie Scott schools “capable of operating alone” may The Department for Education updated Senior reporter: John Dickens mean small, rural schools are not covered. its application forms for academy Morgan told a heated debate in the House conversion a few hours before the debate. Senior reporter: Freddie Whittaker of Commons on Wednesday that schools Labour MPs attempt to intervene in Morgan’s speech It included, for the first time, an Reporter: Billy Camden would not be forced to “join up in a trust” education at right-leaning think tank Policy explanation that new academies would be with others, under her plans to convert Exchange, told Schools Week he understood expected to either join or form a trust. Photographer: Ellis O’Brien them all into academies by 2022. single-academy trusts would still be an Schools must indicate which trust they Cartoonist: Stan Dupp The statement was supposed to bring option for schools, but “high-performing will join, or which schools will join a trust comfort to backbenchers who criticised the converters will be expected to play a wider led by them, or name at least one school Financials: Helen Neilly government’s plans throughout the debate. system support role”. that will receive “support” from them. Victoria Boyle In particular, Conservative MPs worried He said “schools capable of operating A department spokesperson said smaller schools in rural constituencies alone” referred to those that would be supporting a “weaker school” was a Sales manager: Hannah Smith would be forced to join larger trusts which financially “sustainable”. Sir David Carter, condition of academy status: “It is for Sales executive: Wallace Williams might then merge them or force closures. the national schools commissioner, has them to decide what the most effective Morgan was adamant multi-academy previously said schools with about 1,000 arrangement will be, but the support should Administration: Frances Ogefere Dell trusts would not be forced on to schools. children are likely to meet the sustainability have a measurable impact on standards as She told parliament: “Schools will not level. a result.” Contributors: Toby Salt be forced to join up in a trust with other Of the 16,766 primary schools counted in During the debate, organised by schools. the most recent government figures, only the Labour Party’s leadership, shadow Ross McGill “As it happens many schools want 87 had more than 800 pupils. It is unclear education secretary Lucy Powell accused Kiran Gill to join a trust because they can see if the smaller schools, mentioned the government of wasting resources as the benefits. Two thirds of current by backbenchers, would well as headteachers’ energy and time on Emma Mattinson-Hardy academies have chosen to be part therefore be covered. an “unnecessary £1.3 billion top-down of multi-academy trusts, and, of Kevin Courtney, deputy reorganisation of the education system”, course, outstanding schools can set general secretary of and claimed the Conservatives’ up their own multi-academy trusts. the National Union of “obsession with school structures” had Managing director: Shane Mann “But to be absolutely clear we will Teachers, said “completely missed the point”. And tweet us your thoughts @schoolsweek or never make any successful school, At the end of the debate, Labour’s with the hashtag #schoolsweek large or small, that is capable of motion, which called for operating alone, join a trust.” a halt to the plans, was subscribe Jonathan Simons, head of defeated. Jonathan Simons Lucy Powell For an annual subscription to Schools Week for just £50 visit www.schoolsweek.co.uk and click on ‘subscribe’ at the top of the page. SCHOOLS BAN PUPILS FROM TOUGHER LEARNING MATERIALS www.schoolsweek.co.uk or call 020 8123 4778 to subscribe clear expectation in the new curriculum “My kids didn’t like being slowed down SOPHIE SCOTT that children really securely understand the at first, but their ability to fully understand, @SOPH_E_SCOTT ADVERTISE WITH US content they’ve met before moving on. explain, conceptualise and explain place “That comes from the work of people value has increased enormously as a result If you are interested in placing a product or job advert in a future edition please click on Primary teachers and parents say that such as Tim Oates on highlighting the of the additional time spent on it.” the ‘advertise’ link at the top of the page on schools are insisting pupils not be taught problems with levels: people were so quick Tidd agreed. “Of course, as always, some schoolsweek.co.uk or contact: material above their expected level. to rush forward to reach a new level’s people interpret the messages such as E: [email protected] Discussions on social media this week content that they would often neglect some depth before acceleration as being a ban T: 020 81234 778 reveal that children with higher reading of the fundamental building blocks of on moving through the content, which is levels have been stopped reading books earlier levels.” definitely not the case. Disclaimer Schools Week is owned and published by Lsect Ltd. The views that are more advanced than their peers Oates chaired an expert panel review of “However, it’s a good rule of thumb for expressed within the publication are those of the authors can manage. the national curriculum, which produced teachers to look at the full breadth of the named, and are not necessarily those of Schools Week, Lsect Ltd or any of its employees. While we try to ensure that the Parents blamed the recent shift in a report in 2011 praised international current year group curriculum before information we provide is correct, mistakes do occur and we cannot guarantee the accuracy of our material. the national curriculum to “depth” of education systems focused on “fewer looking to accelerate to the next. The design of the printed newspaper and of the website is understanding and mastery of key things in greater depth”. “There will always be some high attainers copyright of Lsect Ltd and material from the newspaper should not be reproduced without prior permission. If you concepts rather than “breadth” of subject Jonny Walker, a primary teacher in east who have already secured everything, and wish to reproduce an article from either the printed paper or the website, both the article’s author and Schools Week matter. London, said learning was not “sufficiently would be well advised to move on to new must be referenced (to not do so, would be an infringement on Michael Tidd, deputy headteacher at a deep” in some subjects and the curriculum content, but for the majority, a really secure copyright). Lsect Ltd is not responsible for the content of any external Nottinghamshire primary school, said he should improve teaching in those cases. understanding of the relevant year group’s internet sites linked to. Please address any complaints to the editor. We are fully was aware schools were instructing staff Walker (pictured) said: “While in some criteria will stand them in much committed to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of not to use higher level objectives, but did cases, this approach to depth may better stead.” Practice. If you have a complaint which cannot be resolved by the editor, write to the Press Complaints Commission, Halton not believe it was common practice. be being brought in quite bluntly, A Department for Education House, 22—23 Holborn, London EC1N 2JD He said it most likely meant teachers there is an equal danger that in not spokesperson said: “The national were not using a higher year group’s acknowledging the motivations for curriculum clearly states schools Learning & Skills Events, tick-boxes on “whatever unwieldy tracking bringing in a requirement for greater should encourage children to read Consultancy and Training Ltd system they use”. conceptual depth, parents and widely and any suggestion to 161-165 Greenwich High Road “It’s a misunderstanding of the teachers might be overly reliant the contrary is nonsense.” London SE10 8JA new curriculum, and sadly one coupled on the belief that burning T: 020 8123 4778 with misunderstandings of what through a curriculum is a E: [email protected] is meant by mastery.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Admission Authorities in Waltham Forest
    Appeal Information for Parents 2016/2017 Local Authority (LA) Community Schools For all LA Community Schools and Chingford CofE Primary School the admission authority is the London Borough of Waltham Forest. If you wish to appeal for a place at one of the schools, for which your application was unsuccessful, please contact the School Admissions Service on the number below. Appeals forms and guidance can be obtained by emailing [email protected] or, if you wish to see an officer, please contact the School Admissions Service, on 020 8496 3000 to make an appointment at Sycamore House, Walthamstow Town Hall Complex, Forest Road, London, E17 4DF. The closing date for receipt of appeals is 16 May 2016. Late applicants, please contact us. Trust School Buxton School (Primary Phase) The Governors of the school are the admissions authority. However, the LA is administering the appeals process for the school this year and the process and timetable are described for LA community Schools above. All-Through Community School George Mitchell School The Governors of the school are the admissions authority. However the LA is administering the appeals process for the school this year and the process and timetable are described for LA community schools above. Academies Barclay Primary School, Chingford Hall Primary School, Hillyfield Primary Academy, Larkswood Primary Academy, Riverley Primary School, Roger Ascham Primary School, Sybourn Primary School, Woodside Primary Academy, Thomas Gamuel Primary School, Walthamstow Primary Academy, Whittingham Primary School and Willow Brook Primary School Academy. The Governors of these schools are the admission authority. However the LA is administering the appeals process for these schools this year and the process and timetable are described for LA community schools above.
    [Show full text]
  • The Review 2018
    The Review 2018 “The object of The Corporation shall be to provide at the School an education of the highest class” (Royal Charter) Chairman of the Governing Body Mr R Ringrose | Head Mrs S Kerr-Dineen MA (Cambridge) Bursar and Secretary to the Governing Body Mr DJ Toriati MA OBE Front Cover : Flight by Chloe Leong (D 18) Upper2 Sixth A level Art Exhibition, Yarrow Gallery Introduction from The Chairman Robert Ringrose Chairman of the Governing Body It is a privilege to introduce the fifth edition of The Review, a publication introduced by the Governing Body in 2014 to report on, and reflect upon, progress against our objectives, whilst providing a concise summary of The Corporation of Oundle School’s financial expenditure and income generation. Compiling The Review offers a valuable opportunity to 1879-1883 Headship of ‘No playing field, no boarding consider what constitutes ‘an education of the highest School’ culminated in the introduction of a sporting class’. It is notable that under Sarah Kerr-Dineen’s curriculum, to the beginning of the 20th century when thoughtful leadership, our values as a School are utmost Oundle was put firmly on the map of leading English in everything we set out to achieve. Pupils are genuinely public schools by its most famous headmaster, FW central to every decision made and as I reflect upon Sanderson, who established its reputation as one of the this year’s highlights, it is clear that this commitment to great science and engineering schools. generations of Oundelians stands the School in the best In this vein, 2017/18 was a period of significant pastoral possible stead to prepare pupils for a successful and development for Oundle, culminating in the completion of meaningful adulthood.
    [Show full text]
  • KSA's Second Year
    under the mTerm 6 Newsletter 2011 Issuecroscope Nine 03-07 Primary Phase • 08 Goodbye Message • 09-24 Secondary Phase BUSY END TO Executive Principal Knighted For Services KSA’s Second Year To Education Kettering Science Academy has shown just how New roles of responsibility have been created A busy and productive year was topped off far it has come in its second year with a busy in each House, with each student encouraged with the news that the Executive Principal of and productive final term. to play a part in shaping life at the Academy. the Brooke Weston Partnership was awarded a From ICU days and House celebration Other highlights this term include awards for knighthood in the Queen’s Birthday Honours List. assemblies, to a creative arts exhibition and our anti-bullying initiatives and for our active Sir Peter Simpson, whose career in education an awards ceremony for students on our involvement in Aim Higher, a programme that spans 40 years, oversees Corby Business Alternative Curriculum, the drive to create an promotes higher education to young people. Academy, Brooke Weston Academy and inclusive Academy where everyone can thrive Next year is the final year in the current Kettering Science Academy. has continued in earnest. Sir Peter said: “I have been very fortunate with Students have once again proved to be the building and with so much achieved already, the people I have worked with in the 40 years driving force behind much of what has been KSA is determined to keep the momentum I have been doing this job, from my first head achieved, including coming up with their own going ahead of the move into the new of department when I was a new teacher, right enterprising charity ideas and designing new building – the next step in a bright future for through to a succession of teachers from whom the Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary to Secondary Ontime & Late Offers 2019.Xlsx
    Year 7 September 2019 'On Time Late' Offers Information @ 26/02/2019 Primary to Secondary Transition for September 2019 Entry - National Offer Day On Time & Late Applicants Total On Time & Late Offers - Newham and Out Borough Residents Newham On-Line Applications: 4545 Newham Paper Applications: 86 Places LA Total Offers Out Admission Year 6 All Over Actual On Time First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Remaining Newham Establishment Cap Bulge Class Alternative & Borough Boys Girls Number Through Allocation Places Preferences Preference Preference Preference Preference Preference Preference Before Late Pupils Allocation Allocations Pupils Apps Bobby Moore Academy 180 0 0 0 0 180 564 102 46 23 6 2 1 0 180 0 94 86 113 67 Brampton Manor Academy 300 0 0 0 90 390 2797 376 10 2 1 0 1 0 390 0 387 3 214 176 Chobham Academy 180 0 -90 0 24 114 1091 94 16 3 0 1 0 0 114 0 74 40 67 47 The Cumberland School 300 0 0 0 30 330 619 89 55 16 8 1 2 159 330 0 323 7 155 175 East London Science School 120 0 0 0 5 125 505 65 25 20 9 4 2 0 125 0 94 31 79 46 Eastlea Community School 240 0 0 0 0 240 277 97 17 7 6 4 1 110 242 -2 237 5 101 141 Eleanor Smith School N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 1 0 1 0 Forest Gate Community School 210 0 0 60 0 270 1283 242 16 10 1 1 0 0 270 0 261 9 163 107 John F Kennedy Special School N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 N/A 9 0 6 3 Kingsford Community School 330 0 0 0 30 360 770 184 109 37 10 8 2 10 360 0 349 11 193 167 Langdon Academy 360 0 -81 0 0 279 893 147 104 17 15 1 2 0 286 -7 280 6 183 103 Lister Community
    [Show full text]
  • Barclay Secondary Free School
    Free school application form 2014 Mainstream and 16 to 19 (updated August 2014) BARCLAY SECONDARY FREE SCHOOL Barclay Secondary Free School Application October 2014.docx Lion Academy Trust 1 Contents Declaration ..................................................................................................................5 Section A: Applicant details .........................................................................................6 Section B: Outline of the school ..................................................................................6 Section C: Education vision.........................................................................................7 Section D – Education Plan Part 1 ............................................................................ 16 Section D: Education plan – part 2 ............................................................................ 18 Section D1: the curriculum plan ................................................................................ 20 D2 Measuring Performance and setting targets ........................................................ 49 Section D3: staffing ................................................................................................... 55 Section E: Evidence of need – part 1 ........................................................................ 63 Section E: Evidence of need – part 2 ........................................................................ 64 Section E: Evidence of need – Part 2 - Successful Engagement with the community
    [Show full text]
  • Arts Award & Beyond
    Arts Award & Beyond... Developing Creative Opportunities for Young People across Waltham Forest Report of current provision with Project Action Plan By Laura Elliott, Project Consultant and Coordinator November 2013 – March 2014 CONTENTS Acknowledgements i Explanation of key organisations and terms ii Executive summary iv Project Action Plan vii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 About the report 1 1.2 Research methodology 1 1.3 Report aims and objectives 2 2. Key findings and recommendations 3 2.1 Identify existing arts provision for young people aged 14-25 3 2.2 Identify main structures of communication for arts providers 7 2.3 Provide an overview of the organisation of work experience, apprenticeships and volunteering 9 2.4 Identify the main benefits of Arts Award to education providers 10 2.5 Identify the main incentives and barriers to participation 12 2.6 Identify and encourage new partner organisations able to engage young people not currently participating in the arts 15 2.7 Summary of the full recommendations with action points 16 3. Project Action Plan up to March 2014 17 3.1 Project milestones 18 4 Conclusion 19 Sources 20 Appendices 21 Appendix i: Table of Arts Award and Artsmark activity in schools 21 Appendix ii: List of Waltham Forest education, youth and arts organisations working with young people aged 16-25 22 Appendix iii: Waltham Forest schools networks 26 a) Table of Waltham Forest Area Partnerships 25 b) List of Waltham Forest Schools Networks 26 c) Case Studies of information networks used by two WFAEN member schools 28 Appendix iv: Survey and consultation results 29 Appendix v: Sample of questionnaire 30 Appendix vi: Consultation exercise and notes 33 a) Barriers and benefits 33 b) Next steps: Communication 35 c) Next steps: Work experience 36 Cover illustration: Students from Chingford Foundation School displaying relief prints completed during a workshop at the William Morris Gallery attended as part of their Bronze Arts Award.
    [Show full text]
  • Bold Beginnings
    Bold beginnings: The Reception curriculum in a sample of good and outstanding primary schools In January 2017, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector (HMCI) commissioned an Ofsted-wide review of the curriculum. Its aim was to provide fresh insight into leaders’ curriculum intentions, how these are implemented and the impact on outcomes for pupils. This report shines a spotlight on the Reception Year and the extent to which a school’s curriculum for four- and five-year-olds prepares them for the rest of their education and beyond. 2 Bold beginnings – November 2017, No. 170045 Contents Executive summary 4 Key findings 5 Recommendations 7 Reception – a unique and important year 8 The curriculum 12 Teaching 16 Language and literacy 19 Mathematics 24 Assessment and the early years foundation stage profile 26 Initial teacher education 29 Methodology 31 Annex A: Schools visited 32 Annex B: Online questionnaire 34 3 www.gov.uk/ofsted Executive summary A good early education is the foundation for later supposed to teach it. This seemed to stem from success. For too many children, however, their misinterpreting what the characteristics of effective Reception Year is a missed opportunity that can leave learning in the early years foundation stage (EYFS)2 – them exposed to all the painful and unnecessary ‘playing and exploring, active learning, and creating consequences of falling behind their peers. and thinking critically’ – required in terms of the curriculum they provided. During the summer term 2017, Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) visited successful primary schools The EYFS profile (EYFSP)3 is a mechanism for statutory in which children, including those from disadvantaged summative assessment at the end of the foundation backgrounds1, achieved well.
    [Show full text]
  • Bold Beginnings: the Reception Curriculum in A
    Bold beginnings: The Reception curriculum in a sample of good and outstanding primary schools In January 2017, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector (HMCI) commissioned an Ofsted-wide review of the curriculum. Its aim was to provide fresh insight into leaders’ curriculum intentions, how these are implemented and the impact on outcomes for pupils. This report shines a spotlight on the Reception Year and the extent to which a school’s curriculum for four- and five-year-olds prepares them for the rest of their education and beyond. 2 Bold beginnings – November 2017, No. 170045 Contents Executive summary 4 Key findings 5 Recommendations 7 Reception – a unique and important year 8 The curriculum 12 Teaching 16 Language and literacy 19 Mathematics 24 Assessment and the early years foundation stage profile 26 Initial teacher education 29 Methodology 31 Annex A: Schools visited 32 Annex B: Online questionnaire 34 3 www.gov.uk/ofsted Executive summary A good early education is the foundation for later supposed to teach it. This seemed to stem from success. For too many children, however, their misinterpreting what the characteristics of effective Reception Year is a missed opportunity that can leave learning in the early years foundation stage (EYFS)2 – them exposed to all the painful and unnecessary ‘playing and exploring, active learning, and creating consequences of falling behind their peers. and thinking critically’ – required in terms of the curriculum they provided. During the summer term 2017, Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) visited successful primary schools The EYFS profile (EYFSP)3 is a mechanism for statutory in which children, including those from disadvantaged summative assessment at the end of the foundation backgrounds1, achieved well.
    [Show full text]
  • Pupils Who Sat the Test
    Exam Venue Exam Venue Total Outside of Redbridge 45 Ilford County High School 1124 Woodford County High School 1091 Grand Total 2260 Month of Birth Month of Birth WCHS ICHS Grand Total January 105 92 197 February 84 90 174 March 92 87 179 April 90 108 198 May 113 87 200 June 66 94 160 July 106 86 192 August 87 84 171 September 92 106 198 October 107 119 226 Novebmer 83 90 173 December 96 96 192 Grand Total 1121 1139 2260 Score Score ICHS WCHS Grand Total Scored less that 104 720 635 1355 Scored 104 or more 419 486 905 Grand Total 1139 1121 2260 Common Catchment Area Common Catchment Area WCHS ICHS Grand Total In CCA 907 915 1822 Out CCA 214 224 438 Grand Total 1121 1139 2260 Home to School Distance Distance WCHS ICHS Grand Total Under 1/2 mile 5 27 32 Between 1/2 and 1 mile 32 95 127 Between 1 and 2 miles 106 184 290 Between 2 and 5 miles 561 636 1197 Over 5 miles 417 197 614 Grand Total 1121 1139 2260 Home Local Authority Home LA WCHS ICHS Grand Total Barking & Dagenham 78 98 176 Barnet Less than 5 Less than 5 Bedford Borough Less than 5 Less than 5 Bexley Less than 5 Less than 5 Birmingham Less than 5 Less than 5 Bracknell Forest Borough Less than 5 Less than 5 Buckinghamshire County Less than 5 Less than 5 Less than 5 City of Westminster Less than 5 Less than 5 Coventry Less than 5 Less than 5 Ealing Less than 5 Less than 5 Less than 5 Enfield 8 Less than 5 11 Essex 47 24 71 Greenwich Less than 5 Less than 5 Hackney 5 Less than 5 8 Hampshire Less than 5 Less than 5 Haringey Less than 5 Less than 5 Harrow Less than 5 Less than 5 Less
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Waltham Forest Admission Arrangements 2018/19
    Waltham Forest Determined Admission Arrangements 2021/2022 1 Background In accordance with The School Admissions (Admission Arrangements and Co- ordination of Admission Arrangements) (England) Regulations 2012, admission authorities are required to determine their admission arrangements each year. London Borough Waltham Forest is the admission authority for all community and voluntary controlled schools within the borough. The admission arrangements for all schools must be determined in advance of the academic year to which they are relevant. For the academic year 2021/22, all admission authorities must have determined their arrangements by 28 February 2020. What are admission arrangements? Admission arrangements are the overall procedure, practices and oversubscription criteria used in deciding the allocation of school places. It describes the full set of arrangements on how a school will admit pupils. This includes the published admission number (the maximum number of pupils intended to be admitted to the relevant year group), the oversubscription criteria and information on waiting lists. Primary School Admissions Pan London Co- No changes ordinated scheme Admissions criteria Mini catchment removed from the distance criterion for Gwyn Jones Primary School, The Jenny Hammond Primary School and Coppermill Primary School Admission numbers for community and voluntary controlled primary schools Other changes No changes Secondary School Admissions Pan London co- No changes ordinated scheme 2 Admissions criteria No changes Admission No changes numbers for community secondary schools Other changes No changes In- Year School Admissions In-year admissions No changes scheme 3 Pan London co-ordinated scheme - Arrangements for Primary Transfer The relatively high level of applications to schools outside of the child’s home Local Authority (LA) in the London region mean there is a need to co-ordinate admissions on a Pan-London basis across the 33 London authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • MGLA260719-8697 Date
    Our ref: MGLA260719-8697 Date: 22 August 2018 Dear Thank you for your request for information which the GLA received on 26 June 2019. Your request has been dealt with under the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR) 2004. Our response to your request is as follows: 1. Please provide the precise number and list of locations/names of primary and secondary schools in London where air pollution breaches legal limit, according to your most recent data (I believe the same metric has been used across the years, of annual mean limit of 40ug/m3 NO2, but please clarify). If you are able to provide more recent data without breaching the s12 time limit please do. If not, please provide underlying data from May 2018 (see below). Please provide as a spreadsheet with school name, pollution level, and any location information such as borough. This data is available on the London datastore. The most recent available data is from the London Atmospheric Emission Inventory (LAEI) 2016 and was published in April 2019. The data used for the 2018 report is LAEI 2013. Please find attached a list and a summary of all Educational Establishments in London and NO2 levels based on both the LAEI 2013 update and LAEI 2016. The list has been taken from the register of educational establishments in England and Wales, maintained by the Department for Education, and provides information on establishments providing compulsory, higher and further education. It was downloaded on 21/03/2019, just before the release of the LAEI 2016. The attached spreadsheet has recently been published as part of the LAEI 2016 stats on Datastore here.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Admissions Cycle
    Applications, Offers & Acceptances by UCAS Apply Centre 2014 UCAS Apply School Name Postcode School Sector Applications Offers Acceptances Centre 10002 Ysgol David Hughes LL59 5SS Maintained 4 <3 <3 10008 Redborne Upper School and Community College MK45 2NU Maintained 11 5 4 10011 Bedford Modern School MK41 7NT Independent 20 5 3 10012 Bedford School MK40 2TU Independent 19 3 <3 10018 Stratton Upper School, Bedfordshire SG18 8JB Maintained 3 <3 <3 10020 Manshead School, Luton LU1 4BB Maintained <3 <3 <3 10022 Queensbury Academy LU6 3BU Maintained <3 <3 <3 10024 Cedars Upper School, Bedfordshire LU7 2AE Maintained 4 <3 <3 10026 St Marylebone Church of England School W1U 5BA Maintained 20 6 5 10027 Luton VI Form College LU2 7EW Maintained 21 <3 <3 10029 Abingdon School OX14 1DE Independent 27 13 13 10030 John Mason School, Abingdon OX14 1JB Maintained <3 <3 <3 10031 Our Lady's Abingdon Trustees Ltd OX14 3PS Independent <3 <3 <3 10032 Radley College OX14 2HR Independent 10 4 4 10033 St Helen & St Katharine OX14 1BE Independent 14 8 8 10036 The Marist Senior School SL5 7PS Independent <3 <3 <3 10038 St Georges School, Ascot SL5 7DZ Independent 4 <3 <3 10039 St Marys School, Ascot SL5 9JF Independent 6 3 3 10041 Ranelagh School RG12 9DA Maintained 7 <3 <3 10043 Ysgol Gyfun Bro Myrddin SA32 8DN Maintained <3 <3 <3 10044 Edgbarrow School RG45 7HZ Maintained <3 <3 <3 10045 Wellington College, Crowthorne RG45 7PU Independent 20 6 6 10046 Didcot Sixth Form College OX11 7AJ Maintained <3 <3 <3 10048 Faringdon Community College SN7 7LB Maintained
    [Show full text]