Schools Forum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Schools Forum Total Membership 25 The Forum is quorate if at least 40% (10) of the members are present London Borough of Waltham Forest SCHOOLS FORUM Day/Date/Time Venue Wednesday 11 December 2019 Norlington School and 6th Form Tea/Coffee and Light Refreshments: 5:00pm Norlington Road, Leyton, London, E10 6JZ Main Meeting: 5:30pm (Parking Access via Pretoria Road) Contact: Telephone / Email: Clerk to Schools Forum [email protected] Maintained Primary Headteacher Representatives (5) Kathryn Soulard Greenleaf Primary School Tracey Griffiths Barncroft Primary School Lindsey Lampard Chingford C of E Primary Linda Adair Henry Maynard Primary School and Nursery Ruth Boon St Joseph’s Infants Primary Academies and Primary Free Schools Representatives (4) Amanda Daoud Lime Trust Larkswood Anne Powell Riverley Primary Maureen Okoye (Chair) Davies Lane Primary Academy & Selwyn Primary VACANT Maintained Primary Governor Representatives (1) Aktar Beg Edinburgh Primary Nursery School Representative (1) Helen Currie Forest Alliance Nursery Schools Maintained Secondary Headteacher Representatives (2) Clive Rosewell Willowfield School Jenny Smith Frederick Bremer Secondary Academies and Secondary Free Schools Representatives (4) Tracey Penfold Highams Park John Hernandez Norlington School and Sixth Form Rob Pittard Norlington School and Sixth Form Jane Benton Chingford and South Chingford Foundation Maintained Secondary Governor Representative (1) Gillian Barker Walthamstow School for Girls Special School and Special Academies Representative (1) Elaine Colquhoun Whitefield Academy Trust PRU (1) Catherine Davis Hawkswood Group Non School Members (4) Early Years Providers Sarah Kendrick (Redwood Pre-School) 16-19 Providers Joy Kettyle (Waltham Forest College) Trade Unions Steve White (NEU) Diocesan Andy Stone (Holy Family) 1 Total Membership 25 The Forum is quorate if at least 40% (10) of the members are present AGENDA Agenda Report Name Report Authors Item 1 Welcome all and Apologies. Chair 2 Declarations of Interest All 3 Minutes of the Meeting held on 13 November Chair 2019 and Matters Arising 3a Matters Arising Chair 3b Decision Sheet from Meeting 13 November For the record 2019 4a Growth Fund 2020-21 Jerome Francis 4b Falling Rolls Fund 2020-21 Jerome Francis 5 Update on LFF 2020-21 Jerome Francis 6 Services to Maintained Schools 2020-21 Duncan James-Pike 7 Central School Services Block 2020-21 Duncan James-Pike 8 1.Paper from SEND Crisis Ken Barlow 2.Statement from the London Borough of David Kilgallon Waltham Forest 9 Proposals for High Needs 2020-2021 David Kilgallon Date of Next Meeting: Wednesday 15 January 2020 5:30pm (Light refreshments from 5:00pm) Norlington School and 6th Form Norlington Road, Leyton, London, E10 6JZ 2 Schools Forum – 13 November 2019 MINUTES OF SCHOOLS FORUM MEETING Wednesday, 13 November 2019 Norlington School and Sixth Form 5:30-6:44 ATTENDEES Jelise Caruth Clerk to Schools Forum [email protected] Maintained Primary Headteacher Representatives (5) Kathryn Soulard Greenleaf Primary School Kate Jennings Mission Grove Lindsey Lampard Chingford C of E Primary Linda Adair Henry Maynard Primary School and Nursery Ruth Boon St Joseph’s Infants Primary Academies and Primary Free Schools Representatives (4) Amanda Daoud Lime Trust Larkswood Anne Powell Riverley Primary (Not Present) Maureen Okoye (Chair) Davies Lane Primary Academy & Selwyn Primary Academy VACANT Maintained Primary Governor Representatives (1) Aktar Beg Edinburgh Primary Nursery School Representative (1) Helen Currie Forest Alliance Nursery Schools Maintained Secondary Headteacher Representatives (2) Clive Rosewell Willowfield School Meryl Davies Walthamstow School for Girls Secondary Academies and Secondary Free School Representatives (3) Tracey Penfold Highams Park John Hernandez Norlington School and Sixth Form (Vice-Chair) Rob Pittard Norlington School and Sixth Form (Not Present) Jane Benton Chingford and South Chingford Foundation (Not Present) Maintained Secondary Governor Representative (1) Gillian Barker Walthamstow School for Girls Special School and Special Academies Representative (1) Elaine Colquhoun Whitefield trust PRU (1) 3 1 Schools Forum – 13 November 2019 Catherine Davis Hawkswood Group (Not Present) Non-School Representatives (4) Early Years Providers Sarah Kendrick (Redwood Pre-School) 16-19 Providers Liz Tattle (Waltham Forest College) Trade Unions Steve White (NEU) (Not Present) Diocesan Andy Stone (Holy Family) LBWF Officers Duncan James-Pike Strategic Finance Advisor – Children and Young People Services Raina Turner Head of Finance Families Group (Schools and Education Services) Mohammed Akhtar E Y Finance Manager Jerome Francis Principal Accountant David Kilgallon Director of Learning, Families and Homes Sergio Dimech Principal Accountant Jelise Caruth LBWF, Clerk to Schools Forum Observers Heather Flinders Strategic Director of Families Gary Pocock Lime Trust Hornbeam Gill Hart George Tomlinson Primary School Nicola Wilson Karina Thomson Shermaine Lewis SBM, Frederick Bremer School Graham Jackson SBM, Willowfield School Apologies Jane Benton Chingford and South Chingford Foundation Jenny Smith Frederick Bremer Helen Currie Forest Alliance Nursery Schools Rob Pittard Norlington School and Sixth Form 1. Welcome and Apologies The Chair welcomed and thanked all present for attending the meeting. Norlington School & Sixth Form were thanked for offering their school as a venue for School Forum. Observers were identified and noted as well as apologies. 2. Declaration of Interest 4 2 Schools Forum – 13 November 2019 Lime Trust Hornbeam and Lime Trust Larkswood declared special school interest in relation to the agenda items. It was clarified this doesn’t exclude them. 3. Minutes of the Meeting held on 16 October 2019 and Matters Arising It was pointed out that on page 5, item 3.3a, it should read September 2019 instead of September 2018. The time the meeting is closed should also be included on page 10. The minutes were reviewed and approved as an accurate reflection of the meeting. 3a Decision sheet from Meeting 16 October 2019 There were no comments. 4. Local Funding Formula 2020-21 4.1 Asking Schools Forum for some key decisions tonight which will be put out to a short consultation and reported back at the December meeting. 4.2 The LA is recommending that it aims to move to using the NFF factors while using the maximum MFG of +1.84% to distribute the increase in funding we are getting in 2020-21. 4.3 The increase in funding and high MFG allows a “soft landing” into the NFF. The individual school NFF allocations that are published by the ESFA show the NFF calculations, but these are overridden for our schools by the ESFA inflating a baseline that is above current NFF levels. When we use a high MFG the outcome under the LFF and NFF are similar as the MFG overlays any other effects. 4.4 Table 1 shows that the higher the MFG the more evenly the increases are shared out and the lower the MFG the less evenly the increases are shared out: the minimum increase becomes smaller and the maximum increase becomes bigger. This is our recommended model as it seems to match 3 of the 4 principles: fairness, stability and transparency. 4.5 Table 2 shows that the lower the MFG the less it costs so that more funding is available to allocate through other factors. 4.6 Table 3 is like Table 1 but uses the hybrid method (halfway between the NFF and LFF). Again, the MFG is the most important factor. Appendix 1 shows the NFF- based model G 4.7 Appendix 2 shows the hybrid-based model H. For many schools not that much difference between G and H 4.8 Appendix 3 shows MFG operating: takes all pupil led funding + split sites + PFI but excludes rates and lump sum 5 3 Schools Forum – 13 November 2019 4.9 Appendix 4 shows the factor rates used in the different models. The NFF block shows the greater emphasis on LPA and IDACI and less emphasis on Basic Entitlement (AWPU) as discussed previously 4.10 Appendix 5 shows indicative actual and per pupil costs of top slicing for different levels of the Falling Rolls Fund, contingencies and possible contributions to the Growth Fund or HNB 4.11 Comments, Questions and Responses There were none. 4.12 Recommendation: 4.13 To note that we will be doing a week-long online consultation to check out your decisions giving all schools the opportunity to comment and also to agree: to either move towards the NFF as in model G or something else; preference for MFG to be at 1.84% as a maximum set or at another rate; and if we do have any additional funding available after running the formula that we put that through basic entitlement (AWPU) or another way. This will be our mandate for how we aim to do things. Once we get the October 19 census in mid-December then the actual budgeting tool may need to be moderated if it starts calculating strange outliers. This will set the principles by which we set the budget. 4.14 Vote to agree on 2.2.1A (NFF Model G) or 2.2.1B (another model): A- 16 B-0 No Abstentions 4.15 Vote to agree 2.3A (MFG +1.84%) or 2.3B (another rate): A-16 B-0 No Abstentions 4.16 Vote to agree 2.4A (Basic Entitlement) or 2.4B (another method) A-16 B-0 No Abstentions 5. Growth Fund and Falling Rolls Fund 5.1 We are asking School Forum to note the minimum allocation that we expect to get is £885,000 but we’re expecting to spend £1.47 million on growing the existing scheme and it is needed to agree how to close the gap. There are several ways of doing this. Either we honour the growth scheme in full and top slice the schools block; or we honour it in full and we use Growth Funding reserve; or our preferred method, a combination of the two; or scale back to cost no more than the money that we have available.
Recommended publications
  • Admission Authorities in Waltham Forest
    Appeal Information for Parents 2016/2017 Local Authority (LA) Community Schools For all LA Community Schools and Chingford CofE Primary School the admission authority is the London Borough of Waltham Forest. If you wish to appeal for a place at one of the schools, for which your application was unsuccessful, please contact the School Admissions Service on the number below. Appeals forms and guidance can be obtained by emailing [email protected] or, if you wish to see an officer, please contact the School Admissions Service, on 020 8496 3000 to make an appointment at Sycamore House, Walthamstow Town Hall Complex, Forest Road, London, E17 4DF. The closing date for receipt of appeals is 16 May 2016. Late applicants, please contact us. Trust School Buxton School (Primary Phase) The Governors of the school are the admissions authority. However, the LA is administering the appeals process for the school this year and the process and timetable are described for LA community Schools above. All-Through Community School George Mitchell School The Governors of the school are the admissions authority. However the LA is administering the appeals process for the school this year and the process and timetable are described for LA community schools above. Academies Barclay Primary School, Chingford Hall Primary School, Hillyfield Primary Academy, Larkswood Primary Academy, Riverley Primary School, Roger Ascham Primary School, Sybourn Primary School, Woodside Primary Academy, Thomas Gamuel Primary School, Walthamstow Primary Academy, Whittingham Primary School and Willow Brook Primary School Academy. The Governors of these schools are the admission authority. However the LA is administering the appeals process for these schools this year and the process and timetable are described for LA community schools above.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary to Secondary Ontime & Late Offers 2019.Xlsx
    Year 7 September 2019 'On Time Late' Offers Information @ 26/02/2019 Primary to Secondary Transition for September 2019 Entry - National Offer Day On Time & Late Applicants Total On Time & Late Offers - Newham and Out Borough Residents Newham On-Line Applications: 4545 Newham Paper Applications: 86 Places LA Total Offers Out Admission Year 6 All Over Actual On Time First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Remaining Newham Establishment Cap Bulge Class Alternative & Borough Boys Girls Number Through Allocation Places Preferences Preference Preference Preference Preference Preference Preference Before Late Pupils Allocation Allocations Pupils Apps Bobby Moore Academy 180 0 0 0 0 180 564 102 46 23 6 2 1 0 180 0 94 86 113 67 Brampton Manor Academy 300 0 0 0 90 390 2797 376 10 2 1 0 1 0 390 0 387 3 214 176 Chobham Academy 180 0 -90 0 24 114 1091 94 16 3 0 1 0 0 114 0 74 40 67 47 The Cumberland School 300 0 0 0 30 330 619 89 55 16 8 1 2 159 330 0 323 7 155 175 East London Science School 120 0 0 0 5 125 505 65 25 20 9 4 2 0 125 0 94 31 79 46 Eastlea Community School 240 0 0 0 0 240 277 97 17 7 6 4 1 110 242 -2 237 5 101 141 Eleanor Smith School N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 1 0 1 0 Forest Gate Community School 210 0 0 60 0 270 1283 242 16 10 1 1 0 0 270 0 261 9 163 107 John F Kennedy Special School N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 N/A 9 0 6 3 Kingsford Community School 330 0 0 0 30 360 770 184 109 37 10 8 2 10 360 0 349 11 193 167 Langdon Academy 360 0 -81 0 0 279 893 147 104 17 15 1 2 0 286 -7 280 6 183 103 Lister Community
    [Show full text]
  • School Direct (Unsalaried) Route 2014/15
    SCHOOL DIRECT (UNSALARIED) ROUTE 2014/15 We are delighted to announce that the Waltham Forest Secondary School Partnership has been awarded 22 School Direct (Unsalaried) placements for 2014/15 in the following subjects: Subject area Number of Partner Provider UCAS application placements window opens on: Art and Design 3 Institute of Education 2/1/14 Biology 3 Institute of Education 21/11/13 Chemistry 1 Institute of Education 21/11/13 Design and Technology (Food 3 University of East London 21/11/13 or Textiles) English 1 University of East London 1/1/14 Geography 1 Institute of Education 21/11/13 History 1 Institute of Education 3/2/14 Mathematics 3 Institute of Education 21/11/13 Modern Foreign Languages 3 Institute of Education 2/1/14 (French with Spanish) All applications will be through the UCAS applications system www.ucas.com where full details regarding entry requirements and application procedures can be found. Applications will need to be made via Willowfield Humanities College, the lead school in a partnership of nine Waltham Forest Secondary Schools comprising the Waltham Forest Secondary Schools Partnership: Willowfield Humanities College Walthamstow School for Girls Norlington School for Boys Holy Family Catholic School and Sixth Form George Mitchell All Through School Kelmscott School George Mitchell All Through School Frederick Bremer Specialist Engineering College The Lammas School All schools in the partnership have a wealth of experience of mentoring and training trainee teachers as well as developing our trainees throughout their teaching career towards leadership roles in our schools. We have well established links and many years of experience of working with in partnership with our two Providers - The Institute of Education and The University of East London.
    [Show full text]
  • Barclay Secondary Free School
    Free school application form 2014 Mainstream and 16 to 19 (updated August 2014) BARCLAY SECONDARY FREE SCHOOL Barclay Secondary Free School Application October 2014.docx Lion Academy Trust 1 Contents Declaration ..................................................................................................................5 Section A: Applicant details .........................................................................................6 Section B: Outline of the school ..................................................................................6 Section C: Education vision.........................................................................................7 Section D – Education Plan Part 1 ............................................................................ 16 Section D: Education plan – part 2 ............................................................................ 18 Section D1: the curriculum plan ................................................................................ 20 D2 Measuring Performance and setting targets ........................................................ 49 Section D3: staffing ................................................................................................... 55 Section E: Evidence of need – part 1 ........................................................................ 63 Section E: Evidence of need – part 2 ........................................................................ 64 Section E: Evidence of need – Part 2 - Successful Engagement with the community
    [Show full text]
  • Arts Award & Beyond
    Arts Award & Beyond... Developing Creative Opportunities for Young People across Waltham Forest Report of current provision with Project Action Plan By Laura Elliott, Project Consultant and Coordinator November 2013 – March 2014 CONTENTS Acknowledgements i Explanation of key organisations and terms ii Executive summary iv Project Action Plan vii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 About the report 1 1.2 Research methodology 1 1.3 Report aims and objectives 2 2. Key findings and recommendations 3 2.1 Identify existing arts provision for young people aged 14-25 3 2.2 Identify main structures of communication for arts providers 7 2.3 Provide an overview of the organisation of work experience, apprenticeships and volunteering 9 2.4 Identify the main benefits of Arts Award to education providers 10 2.5 Identify the main incentives and barriers to participation 12 2.6 Identify and encourage new partner organisations able to engage young people not currently participating in the arts 15 2.7 Summary of the full recommendations with action points 16 3. Project Action Plan up to March 2014 17 3.1 Project milestones 18 4 Conclusion 19 Sources 20 Appendices 21 Appendix i: Table of Arts Award and Artsmark activity in schools 21 Appendix ii: List of Waltham Forest education, youth and arts organisations working with young people aged 16-25 22 Appendix iii: Waltham Forest schools networks 26 a) Table of Waltham Forest Area Partnerships 25 b) List of Waltham Forest Schools Networks 26 c) Case Studies of information networks used by two WFAEN member schools 28 Appendix iv: Survey and consultation results 29 Appendix v: Sample of questionnaire 30 Appendix vi: Consultation exercise and notes 33 a) Barriers and benefits 33 b) Next steps: Communication 35 c) Next steps: Work experience 36 Cover illustration: Students from Chingford Foundation School displaying relief prints completed during a workshop at the William Morris Gallery attended as part of their Bronze Arts Award.
    [Show full text]
  • INSPECTION REPORT Norlington School for Boys Leyton LEA Area
    INSPECTION REPORT Norlington School for Boys Leyton LEA area: Waltham Forest Unique Reference Number: 103098 Headteacher: Ms Josephine Beaton Reporting inspector: Dr Paula Haes Dates of inspection: 6 – 10 December 1999 Under OFSTED contract number: 707954 Inspection number: 187524 Inspection carried out under Section 10 of the School Inspections Act 1996 © Crown Copyright 1999 This report may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that all extracts quoted are reproduced verbatim without adaptation and on condition that the source and date thereof are stated. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the School Inspections Act 1996, the school must provide a copy of this report and/or its summary free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL Type of school: Comprehensive Type of control: County Age range of pupils: 11-16 Gender of pupils: Boys School address: Norlington Road Leyton London E10 6JZ Telephone number: 0181 5393055 Fax number: 0181 556 4657 Appropriate authority: The Governing Body Name of chair of governors: Stephen Pierpoint Date of previous inspection: March 1996 Norlington School for Boys December 1999 INFORMATION ABOUT THE INSPECTION TEAM Team members Subject responsibilities Aspect responsibilities Paula Haes RgI Modern foreign languages Attainment and progress Teaching Leadership and management John Kerr, Lay Inspector Attendance
    [Show full text]
  • Bold Beginnings
    Bold beginnings: The Reception curriculum in a sample of good and outstanding primary schools In January 2017, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector (HMCI) commissioned an Ofsted-wide review of the curriculum. Its aim was to provide fresh insight into leaders’ curriculum intentions, how these are implemented and the impact on outcomes for pupils. This report shines a spotlight on the Reception Year and the extent to which a school’s curriculum for four- and five-year-olds prepares them for the rest of their education and beyond. 2 Bold beginnings – November 2017, No. 170045 Contents Executive summary 4 Key findings 5 Recommendations 7 Reception – a unique and important year 8 The curriculum 12 Teaching 16 Language and literacy 19 Mathematics 24 Assessment and the early years foundation stage profile 26 Initial teacher education 29 Methodology 31 Annex A: Schools visited 32 Annex B: Online questionnaire 34 3 www.gov.uk/ofsted Executive summary A good early education is the foundation for later supposed to teach it. This seemed to stem from success. For too many children, however, their misinterpreting what the characteristics of effective Reception Year is a missed opportunity that can leave learning in the early years foundation stage (EYFS)2 – them exposed to all the painful and unnecessary ‘playing and exploring, active learning, and creating consequences of falling behind their peers. and thinking critically’ – required in terms of the curriculum they provided. During the summer term 2017, Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) visited successful primary schools The EYFS profile (EYFSP)3 is a mechanism for statutory in which children, including those from disadvantaged summative assessment at the end of the foundation backgrounds1, achieved well.
    [Show full text]
  • College Open Day List
    [Type here] College Open Events 2020-2021 Most colleges are now doing virtual open events Please check the sixth form/college website to confirm dates and times of open events, as they may be subject to change, and new dates may be added You will also need to check if you need to register in advance Keep checking on college website for further information of application process Popular Places to study City of Westminster College Keep checking on college website for further Paddington Green, London W2 1NB information on open events and application process 020 7238 8826 / cwc.ac.uk Ilford County High School (Boys) No dates released yet, check the website regularly for Freemantle Road, Barkingside, Ilford IG6 2JB information 020 8551 6496 / ichs.org.uk / [email protected] Leyton Sixth Form College No dates released yet, check the website regularly for Essex Road, Leyton, London E10 6EQ information 020 8928 9000 / leyton.ac.uk ELAM (East London Arts & Music) Bookings via website 45a Maltings Close, London E3 3TA Applications are now open for 2021 020 75152159 / elam.co.uk [email protected] City & Islington College Centre for Applied Sciences (CAS) Marlborough Building, 383 Holloway Road, London N7 Booking required via website 0RN Online application form Sixth Form College: The Angel, 283-309 Goswell Road. London EC1V 7LA Sixth Form College 020 7700 9200 / candi.ac.uk / [email protected] Booking required via website Online application form London Design & Engineering UTC Booking required via website Docklands Campus, University Way,
    [Show full text]
  • Business Action Groups for Schools Autumn Term Report 2014
    Business Action Groups for Schools Autumn term report 2014 BAGSBAGS this this Autumn Autumn:: In this issue 5,0275,799 beneficiaries beneficiaries 114 activities 174 activities Young People Highlights 2 924 volunteers 1,143 volunteers in 14 schools. in 14 schools Borough Perspective; 6 Though this report focuses Cllr Mark Rusling and Eddie Playfair mainlyWe welcome on youngd NewVI people,c to the the Jo Emmerson Jo Emmerson BAGSBAGS team programme. is currently NewVIc Cross School Events 7 Education Works has had a long term Education Works working on ensuring that ProgrammeProgramme Director relationship with ELBA Strategic & Institutional Highlights 9 therethrough is more our up takeCommunity on other strands of the BAGS DearDear BusinessBusiness ActionAction Groups Works programme and has for Schools colleague strategyrecently including joined strategicBAGS for Groups for Schools andsupport institutional in support,strengthening ColleagueAs ELBA's new Education Our schools leadershengagementip and withgovernance. employers. Works Programme Director, I would like to welcome you to WithWe theare implementation looking forward of to Welcome to the Business the latest edition of the theworking BAGS evaluationwith the L&Q Action Groups for Schools Business Action Groups for frameworkFoundation including which h asJET joined (BAGS)Schools end(BAGS) of term End reportof Term KPMG as one of the key over the next academic whichReport. brings you highlights sponsors of the BAGS year,programme we will .be reportingWith their fromThis termanother the busyteam term.has been backsupport on the we full are impact now lookingthat delivering a variety of activity to expand the programme to across the schools and the BAGS programme is This term has been filled reach more schools through businesses with which we achieving.
    [Show full text]
  • Bold Beginnings: the Reception Curriculum in A
    Bold beginnings: The Reception curriculum in a sample of good and outstanding primary schools In January 2017, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector (HMCI) commissioned an Ofsted-wide review of the curriculum. Its aim was to provide fresh insight into leaders’ curriculum intentions, how these are implemented and the impact on outcomes for pupils. This report shines a spotlight on the Reception Year and the extent to which a school’s curriculum for four- and five-year-olds prepares them for the rest of their education and beyond. 2 Bold beginnings – November 2017, No. 170045 Contents Executive summary 4 Key findings 5 Recommendations 7 Reception – a unique and important year 8 The curriculum 12 Teaching 16 Language and literacy 19 Mathematics 24 Assessment and the early years foundation stage profile 26 Initial teacher education 29 Methodology 31 Annex A: Schools visited 32 Annex B: Online questionnaire 34 3 www.gov.uk/ofsted Executive summary A good early education is the foundation for later supposed to teach it. This seemed to stem from success. For too many children, however, their misinterpreting what the characteristics of effective Reception Year is a missed opportunity that can leave learning in the early years foundation stage (EYFS)2 – them exposed to all the painful and unnecessary ‘playing and exploring, active learning, and creating consequences of falling behind their peers. and thinking critically’ – required in terms of the curriculum they provided. During the summer term 2017, Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) visited successful primary schools The EYFS profile (EYFSP)3 is a mechanism for statutory in which children, including those from disadvantaged summative assessment at the end of the foundation backgrounds1, achieved well.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014–15
    Annual Report 2014–15 Published February 2016 Challenge Partners is a national network of local school partnerships. Our mission is to enable every pupil to experience the combined wisdom of the education system. Contents The Partnership 4 Our Collective Aims 12 Our Activities 16 Finances 28 Looking Forward 31 List of Partner Schools 33 Message from the Chief Executive This year our fledgling organisation reached a number of milestones. The first and most significant was that we entered our fifth year. During that time we have learnt much about how to run a successful national network of local Hubs of schools with a common purpose of providing the best education possible for all our pupils, especially the most disadvantaged. Membership of the Network of Excellence reached over 300 schools. This increase came from some new Hubs and also the continual growth of our existing ones. The next milestone was our decision not to form a Challenge Partners MAT. This was made for two reasons. The considerable additional funding we would have had to provide to support its formation, and that our leadership team felt our role was to support those members who wished to form their own MATs and not to compete with them. There are now over 30 MATs in Challenge Partners, with more joining. Nearly a third of the schools are now in MATs and the numbers continue to increase significantly. This has caused us to focus on our core provision for our schools and that now includes the very popular weekly email and a national brokering service.
    [Show full text]
  • Pupils Who Sat the Test
    Exam Venue Exam Venue Total Outside of Redbridge 45 Ilford County High School 1124 Woodford County High School 1091 Grand Total 2260 Month of Birth Month of Birth WCHS ICHS Grand Total January 105 92 197 February 84 90 174 March 92 87 179 April 90 108 198 May 113 87 200 June 66 94 160 July 106 86 192 August 87 84 171 September 92 106 198 October 107 119 226 Novebmer 83 90 173 December 96 96 192 Grand Total 1121 1139 2260 Score Score ICHS WCHS Grand Total Scored less that 104 720 635 1355 Scored 104 or more 419 486 905 Grand Total 1139 1121 2260 Common Catchment Area Common Catchment Area WCHS ICHS Grand Total In CCA 907 915 1822 Out CCA 214 224 438 Grand Total 1121 1139 2260 Home to School Distance Distance WCHS ICHS Grand Total Under 1/2 mile 5 27 32 Between 1/2 and 1 mile 32 95 127 Between 1 and 2 miles 106 184 290 Between 2 and 5 miles 561 636 1197 Over 5 miles 417 197 614 Grand Total 1121 1139 2260 Home Local Authority Home LA WCHS ICHS Grand Total Barking & Dagenham 78 98 176 Barnet Less than 5 Less than 5 Bedford Borough Less than 5 Less than 5 Bexley Less than 5 Less than 5 Birmingham Less than 5 Less than 5 Bracknell Forest Borough Less than 5 Less than 5 Buckinghamshire County Less than 5 Less than 5 Less than 5 City of Westminster Less than 5 Less than 5 Coventry Less than 5 Less than 5 Ealing Less than 5 Less than 5 Less than 5 Enfield 8 Less than 5 11 Essex 47 24 71 Greenwich Less than 5 Less than 5 Hackney 5 Less than 5 8 Hampshire Less than 5 Less than 5 Haringey Less than 5 Less than 5 Harrow Less than 5 Less than 5 Less
    [Show full text]