DOCSLIB.ORG

LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Published: October 17, 2017 City of Suisun City Local Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Published: October 17, 2017 City of Suisun City Local Hazard Mitigation Plan City of Suisun City LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Published: October 17, 2017 City of Suisun City Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Definition of Hazard Mitigation .............................................................................................................. 3 Purpose of the Plan ............................................................................................................................... 4 Profile of City of Suisun City ...................................................................................................................... 5 General Data ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Existing Plans and Information ........................................................................................................... 28 Profile of Solano County ..................................................................................................................... 29 Prerequisites ............................................................................................................................................ 32 Plan Adoption ...................................................................................................................................... 32 Legal Authority ..................................................................................................................................... 33 Planning Process......................................................................................................................................... 35 Documentation of the Planning Process ................................................................................................ 35 Planning Team By Laws ..................................................................................................................... 36 Planning Team Tasks ......................................................................................................................... 37 Planning Team Goals & Objectives ................................................................................................... 38 Public Participation .............................................................................................................................. 40 Stakeholder Participation .................................................................................................................... 47 Assets & Critical Facilities ................................................................................................................... 74 Risk Assessment ......................................................................................................................................... 78 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 78 Hazard Prioritization ............................................................................................................................ 81 Prioritization Results ............................................................................................................................ 83 Profiling Hazards & Assessing Vulnerability .......................................................................................... 86 Natural Hazards ....................................................................................................................................... 86 Earthquake ............................................................................................................................................... 86 Profile for Earthquake .......................................................................................................................... 86 Vulnerability for Earthquake ................................................................................................................ 92 Flooding ................................................................................................................................................. 103 Profile for Flooding............................................................................................................................. 103 Vulnerability for Flooding ................................................................................................................... 112 Wild land/Urban Interface Fire .............................................................................................................. 116 Profile for Wild-land/Urban Interface Fire ......................................................................................... 116 Vulnerability for Wild-land/Urban Interface Fire ............................................................................... 120 Severe Weather ..................................................................................................................................... 125 Profile for Severe Weather ................................................................................................................ 125 Vulnerability for Severe Weather ...................................................................................................... 127 Man-caused & Technological Hazards ................................................................................................ 129 Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................................................. 129 Hazmat Profile ................................................................................................................................... 129 Hazmat Vulnerability ......................................................................................................................... 137 Transportation Hazards ......................................................................................................................... 142 Transportation Hazards Profile ......................................................................................................... 142 Vulnerability for Transportation Hazards .......................................................................................... 144 Utility Loss .............................................................................................................................................. 146 Utility Loss Profile .............................................................................................................................. 146 Utility Loss Vulnerability..................................................................................................................... 155 Water/Wastewater Disruption ............................................................................................................... 159 Wastewater Disruption Profile .......................................................................................................... 164 WMD/Terrorism ..................................................................................................................................... 166 Terrorism & WMD Profile .................................................................................................................. 166 WMD/Terrorism Vulnerability ............................................................................................................ 171 1 City of Suisun City Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Low to No Risk Natural Hazards .......................................................................................................... 174 Hazard Mitigation Strategy ........................................................................................................................ 175 Goals & Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 175 Identification and Prioritization of Mitigation Actions ........................................................................ 175 Implementation of Mitigation Actions ................................................................................................ 182 Plan Maintenance ...................................................................................................................................... 188 Monitoring, Evaluating & Updating ................................................................................................... 188 Continued Public Involvement .......................................................................................................... 188 2 City of Suisun City Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Introduction Summary To summarize, this document contains: The City of Suisun City Hazard Risk Assessment; Prioritization of City of Suisun City for mitigation activities; Hazard Mitigation Strategy Goals and Objectives; Jurisdiction-wide Hazard Mitigation efforts and plan input; Coordination with local interest groups and citizens; Proposed strategies and actions to reduce short and long term vulnerability to the identified hazards; as recommended by the City of Suisun Hazard Mitigation Planning Team,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction San Andreas Fault: an Overview
    Introduction This volume is a general geology field guide to the San Andreas Fault in the San Francisco Bay Area. The first section provides a brief overview of the San Andreas Fault in context to regional California geology, the Bay Area, and earthquake history with emphasis of the section of the fault that ruptured in the Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. This first section also contains information useful for discussion and making field observations associated with fault- related landforms, landslides and mass-wasting features, and the plant ecology in the study region. The second section contains field trips and recommended hikes on public lands in the Santa Cruz Mountains, along the San Mateo Coast, and at Point Reyes National Seashore. These trips provide access to the San Andreas Fault and associated faults, and to significant rock exposures and landforms in the vicinity. Note that more stops are provided in each of the sections than might be possible to visit in a day. The extra material is intended to provide optional choices to visit in a region with a wealth of natural resources, and to support discussions and provide information about additional field exploration in the Santa Cruz Mountains region. An early version of the guidebook was used in conjunction with the Pacific SEPM 2004 Fall Field Trip. Selected references provide a more technical and exhaustive overview of the fault system and geology in this field area; for instance, see USGS Professional Paper 1550-E (Wells, 2004). San Andreas Fault: An Overview The catastrophe caused by the 1906 earthquake in the San Francisco region started the study of earthquakes and California geology in earnest.
    [Show full text]
  • Western States Seismic Policy Council Policy Recommendation 18-3
    WESTERN STATES SEISMIC POLICY COUNCIL POLICY RECOMMENDATION 18-3 Definitions of Recency of Surface Faulting for the Basin and Range Province Policy Recommendation 18-3 WSSPC recommends that each state in the Basin and Range physiographic province (BRP), through consultation with state and federal geological surveys and other earthquake-hazard experts, define scientifically and societally relevant categories for recency of surface faulting (generally earthquake magnitude ≥M 6.5). WSSPC further recommends that in the absence of information to the contrary, all Quaternary faults be considered to have the recency of activity documented in the USGS Quaternary fault and fold database until more adequate data can be developed. Executive Summary Fault recency definitions are limited to the Quaternary because this period of geologic time is considered by the scientific community to be most relevant to paleoseismic studies of earthquake faults (Machette and others, 2004). The recency class of a fault is the youngest class based on the demonstrated age of most recent surface faulting. Latest Pleistocene-Holocene faults are included within the definition of late Quaternary faults, and both latest Pleistocene-Holocene and late Quaternary faults are included in Quaternary faults. Establishment/definition of surface-faulting recency categories are based on the ways that faults are portrayed on geologic maps and on the availability of geologic data in the BRP. Policy makers (owners, regulators, governmental agencies) should consult with state and federal geological surveys and other earthquake-hazard experts in using these recency categories and additional geologic data in developing definitions of hazardous faults to be considered in planning for development or infrastructure projects.
    [Show full text]
  • About This Toolkit
    ABOUT THIS TOOLKIT As an employer, one of the most important jobs is ensuring that employees are content and challenged. Studies show that the flexibility offered by remote work programs improves employee satisfaction, retention, and even increases productivity. Plain and simple, remote work can make your job more efficient! It’s clear that remote work is much more than a growing trend – it’s a proven management tool that lessens traffic congestion on Bay Area roadways, increases productivity, and helps retain skilled workers. Everyone benefits from a carefully directed remote work program. The best remote work programs begin with clear company policies and guidelines. Other important elements to consider incorporating into your remote work program include: An initial assessment program where employers and employees can determine whether this is a good fit for the employee and their work responsibilities Education and training for employees working remotely to learn how to communicate and collaborate with other employees, and how to manage time effectively while working from home Ongoing, regular communication and check-ins with managers and team members Company-provided equipment, including a laptop, to help your employees be more effective and efficient. Employers may also offer reimbursement for purchased equipment, high-speed internet, or cell phone offerings. EmployersSpareTheAir.org SparetheAir Spare the Air, Bay Area SparetheAir Brought to you by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. This toolkit is intended to help businesses
    [Show full text]
  • Vacaville Community-Based Transportation Plan (2010)
    SOLANO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Vacaville Community-Based Transportation Plan September 2010 Vacaville Community-Based Transportation Plan • Final SOLANO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Table of Contents Page Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2. Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 2-1 Study Area Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 2-1 Population and Housing ...................................................................................................................................... 2-1 Income and Poverty Status ................................................................................................................................. 2-2 Race and Ethnicity .............................................................................................................................................. 2-3 Age Distribution ................................................................................................................................................... 2-5 Population with a Disability ................................................................................................................................. 2-6 Language and Linguistic Isolation ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary Faulting in the Kaikoura Region, Southeastern Marlborough, New Zealand
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Russell J. Van Dissen for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on February 15, 1989. Title: Late Quaternary Faulting in the Kaikoura Region, Southeastern Marlborough, New Zealand Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: Dr. Robert 8.0eats Active faults in the Kaikoura region include the Hope, Kekerengu, and Fidget Faults, and the newly discovered Jordan Thrust, Fyffe, and Kowhai Faults. Ages of faulted alluvial terraces along the Hope Fault and the Jordan Thrust were estimated using radiocarbon-calibrated weathering-rind measurements on graywacke clasts. Within the study area, the Hope Fault is divided, from west to east, into the Kahutara, Mt. Fyffe, and Seaward segments. The Kahutara segment has a relatively constant Holocene right-lateral slip rate of 20-32 mm/yr, and an earthquake recurrence interval of 86 to 600 yrs: based on single-event displacements of 3 to 12 m. The western portion of the Mt. Fyffe segment has a minimum Holocene lateral slip rate of 16 + 5 mm/yr .(southeast side up); the eastern portion has horizontal and vertical slip rates of 4.8+ 2.7 mm/yr and 1.7 + 0.2 mm/yr, respectively (northwest side up). There is no dated evidence for late Quaternary movementon the Seaward segment, and its topographic expression is much more subdued than that of the two western segments. The Jordan Thrust extends northeast from the Hope Fault, west of the Seaward segment. The thrust has horizontal and vertical slip rates of 2.2 + 1.3 mm/yr and 2.1 + 0.5 mm/yr, respectively (northwest side up), and a maximum recurrence interval of 1200 yrs: based on 3 events within the last 3.5 ka.
    [Show full text]
  • AC Transit) for Easypass Program 2021 to 2025
    Page 1 of 5 Office of the City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR December 15, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Dee Williams-Ridley, City Manager Submitted by: Liam Garland, Director, Department of Public Works Subject: Contract: Alameda-Contra Costa County Transit District (AC Transit) for EasyPass Program 2021 to 2025 RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract and any amendments with Alameda-Contra Costa County Transit District (AC Transit) for the EasyPass bus transit pass program for City of Berkeley employees in an amount not to exceed $774,453 for the five-year period commencing January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION Total projected five-year cost of the EasyPass program is $774,453. Funds for calendar year 2021 are available in the Payroll Deduction Trust Fund (Fund 013), and future fiscal years funding is subject to appropriation in those annual budgets. Based upon the current estimated minimum pool of 1,402 passes (one pass per employee), the City will remit payment to AC Transit over the life of the contract as projected here: Contract Period Minimum Annual Cost Total Annual Employee Pool Per Pass Contract Costs1 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2021 1,402 $106.15 $148,826 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2022 1,402 $106.15 $148,826 1/1/2022 - 12/31/2023 1,402 $110.48 $154,891 1/1/2023 - 12/31/2024 1,402 $114.80 $160,955 1/1/2024 - 12/31/2025 1,402 $114.80 $160,955 Total $774,453 1 Calculation of total annual contract costs is based upon AC Transit’s level of service score allocated to every COB worksite (approximately 30 as of October 2020), combined into a weighted average that is then multiplied by minimum pool of participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Active and Potentially Active Faults in Or Near the Alaska Highway Corridor, Dot Lake to Tetlin Junction, Alaska
    Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys PRELIMINARY INTERPRETIVE REPORT 2010-1 ACTIVE AND POTENTIALLY ACTIVE FAULTS IN OR NEAR THE ALASKA HIGHWAY CORRIDOR, DOT LAKE TO TETLIN JUNCTION, ALASKA by Gary A. Carver, Sean P. Bemis, Diana N. Solie, Sammy R. Castonguay, and Kyle E. Obermiller September 2010 THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED FOR TECHNICAL CONTENT (EXCEPT AS NOTED IN TEXT) OR FOR CONFORMITY TO THE EDITORIAL STANDARDS OF DGGS. Released by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys 3354 College Rd. Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-3707 $4.00 CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Seismotectonic setting of the Tanana River valley region of Alaska ................................................................ 3 2008 fi eld studies .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Field and analytical methods ............................................................................................................................ 5 Dot “T” Johnson fault ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Robertson
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Corridor-Auburn-Sacramento-San
    Now Serving! Temporary Terminal Transbay CAPITOL ® MARCH 1, 2015 CORRIDOR SCHEDULE Effective AUBURN / SACRAMENTO ® – and – SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA – and – Enjoy the journey. SAN JOSE 1-877-9-RIDECC Call 1-877-974-3322 SAN FRANCISCO - SAN JOSE - OAKLAND - EMERYVILLE SACRAMENTO - ROSEVILLE -AUBURN - RENO And intermediate stations NEW SAN FRANCISCO THRUWAY LOCATION The Amtrak full service Thruway bus station has moved to the Transbay Temporary Terminal, 200 Folsom Street, from the former station at the Ferry Building. CAPITOLCORRIDOR.ORG NRPC Form W34–150M–3/1/15 Stock #02-3342 Schedules subject to change without notice. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corp. Visit Capitol Corridor is a registered service mark of the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. page 2 CAPITOL CORRIDOR-Weekday Westbound Service on the Train Number 521 523 525 527 529 531 533 Capitol Corridor® Will Not Operate 5/25, 7/3, 9/7, 11/26, 11/27, 12/25, 1/1 Coaches: Unreserved. y y Q y Q y Q y Q y Q y Q Café: Sandwiches, snacks On Board Service y å and beverages. å å å å å å Q Amtrak Quiet car. å Mile Symbol Wi-Fi available. @™ Transfer point to/from the Sparks, NV–The Nugget 0 >w Dpp ∑w- Coast Starlight. Reno, NV 3 @∞ BART rapid transit connection Truckee, CA 38 >v >v available for San Francisco Colfax, CA 102 and East Bay points. Transfer >w- Auburn, CA (Grass Valley) 0 6 30A to BART at Richmond or >v- Rocklin, CA 14 6 53A Oakland Coliseum stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Solanoexpress Bus Routes Transit Information Fairfield Transportation Center Fairfield
    Regional Transit Map Transit REGIONAL TRANSIT DIAGRAM To To Eureka Clearlake Information Mendocino Transit DOWNTOWN AREA TRANSIT CONNECTIONS Authority To Ukiah Lake Oakland Mendocino Transit 12th Street Oakland City Center BART: Greyhound BART, AC Transit FA FA 19th Street Oakland BART: FA BART, AC Transit Cloverdale San Francisco Yolobus To Davis Civic Center/UN Plaza BART: Winters Fairfi eld and Suisun Transit SolanoExpress is Solano SolanoExpress is Solano BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Fairfield 101 Embarcadero BART & Ferry Terminal: County’s intercity transit connection. County’s intercity transit connection. BART, Golden Gate Transit, Muni, SamTrans, (FAST) is the local transit system Baylink, Alameda/Oakland Ferry, Alameda Harbor Faireld and Healdsburg Bay Ferry, Blue & Gold Fleet, Amtrak CA Thruway Suisun Transit SolanoExpress routes connect cities SolanoExpress routes connect cities Transit To Sacramento for Fairfi eld and Suisun City and also Mongomery Street BART: Healdsburg BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Dixon within the county and provide service within the county and provide service Calistoga Readi- operates many of the SolanoExpress (Operated by FAST) (Operated by SolTrans) Handi Powell Street BART: Transportation Ride Van Calistoga BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans regional routes. Please visit www.fasttransit. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. San Francisco Caltrain at 4th & King: Dixon Windsor Deer Caltrain, Muni, Amtrak CA Thruway org or call 707-422-BUSS (707-422-2877) for For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or Park Transbay Temporary Terminal: Guerneville AC Transit, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans, 80 visit www.solanoexpress.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Solano County Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia Resources
    SOLANO COUNTY ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND DEMENTIA RESOURCES ADULT DAY CARE NorthBay Adult Day Center (Vacaville) ………………………………………………………..707-624-7970 Solano Day Health Center (Vallejo) ………………………………………(707)-642-6811 or (707)-642-6885 Fairfield Senior Day Program ……………………………………………………………...........707- 428-7742 Brain Boosters……………………………………………………………………………………707-428-7654 ADVOCACY Alzheimer’s Association…………………………………………………………………………707-573-1210 Area Agency on Aging Serving Napa/Solano Counties…………………………………………707-644-6612 Ombudsman Services of Northern California …………………………………..707- 644-4194/ 800-644-4194 ASSISTED TRANSPORTATION Volunteer Driver Programs Fairfield Senior Volunteer Driver Program……………………………………………………707-428-7556 Faith In Action …………………………………………………………………………………707-469-6667 Private Transportation with Wheelchair Lifts AA Medical Transportation……………………………………………………………………707-552-1193 American Alliance……………………………………………………………………………...707-447-7734 Med X Press…………………………………………………………………………………….707-771-0354 Murphy’s Medical Transport……………………………………………………………………707-580-1429 NorthBay Transit Group…………………………………………………………………………707-644-5555 Stan’s Chaperone Service……………………………………………………………………….707-446-9801 Sully’s Transportation…………………………………………………………………………707-290-6349 Taxi Scrip & Intercity Taxi Scrip Rio Vista Delta Breeze………………………………………………………………………….707-374-2878 Fairfield and Suisun Transit……………………………………………………………………..707-434-3800 Vacaville City Coach…………………………………………………………………………….707-449-6000 SOLTRANS (Benicia & Vallejo)………………………………………………………………...707-553-7269
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Semi-Monthly Report
    SEMI-MONTHLY REPORT “A friendly community in which to live, work and play” February 22, 2013 Upcoming City Council Meetings… March 7, 2013 – City Council Meeting @ 7:00pm – City Council Chambers March 21, 2013 – City Council Meeting @ 7:00pm – City Council Chambers March 27, 2013 – Special Council Meeting @ 12 Noon – City Council Chambers April 4, 2013 – City Council Meeting @ 7:00pm – City Council Chambers . City Administration… The City is now contracting with Procomm Inc. for our information technology (I.T.) services. Chris Cannon will remain our contact and he will continue to provide weekly site visits on Wednesday’s. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) will temporarily suspend service of the Real McCoy II Ferry for approximately two-weeks starting on Monday, February 25th until Sunday, March 10th to perform preventive maintenance, and make repairs to the ferry slip. The Real McCoy II is scheduled to be closed Monday, February 25th at 12:01 a.m. until 12:01 a.m. on Sunday, March 10th. All work is weather permitting. During the service interruption, motorists are advised to use Highway 160 and the J-Mack Ferry along Highway 220. For the latest information, motorists can call the Caltrans Ryer Island Ferry Update Line at (510) 622-0120. City Council Reports… Report by Vice Mayor Constance Boulware: I met with Yolo-Solano QMD Air Monitoring Technician Mike Breuning and Executive Director Mat Ehrhardt at the Rio Vista air quality monitoring station. Rio Vista has healthy air most of the year. But there are days in which air pollution can cause health problems for children, the elderly or those with lung or heart ailments.
    [Show full text]