DOCSLIB.ORG

NPDES Permit No. GU0020389 Factsheet Page 2 of 22 Press Is Recycled to the Headworks and Reprocessed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NPDES Permit No. GU0020389 Factsheet Page 2 of 22 Press Is Recycled to the Headworks and Reprocessed NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT FACTSHEET February 2017 Permittee Name: United States Navy Mailing Address: U.S. Navy Base Guam PSC 455 Box 152 FPO AP, GU 96540 Facility Location: U.S. Navy Fena Water Treatment Plant Route 2A, Naval Magazine Santa Rita, GU 96915 Contact Person(s): Charles (Omar) Damian, Environmental Engineer (671) 333-2583 Edward Moon, Installation EV Program Director (671) 339 – 3711 NPDES Permit No.: GU0020389 I. STATUS OF PERMIT The United States Navy (the “permittee”) has applied for the renewal of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit to authorize the discharge of filter backwash water and clarifier overflows from the Fena Water Treatment Plant (the “facility” or “WTP”) to the Namo River. A completed application was submitted on August 20, 2015. The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Region IX is reissuing this facility’s permit pursuant to the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) section 402. CWA section 402, and EPA’s implementing regulations, contain provisions that govern EPA’s authorization to require NPDES permit conditions. (40 CFR 122). The permittee currently is discharging under NPDES permit GU0020389 (previously GU0110019), which was issued February 23, 2011. Pursuant to 40 CFR 122.21, the terms of the existing permit are administratively extended until the issuance of a new permit. This permit has been classified as a minor discharger. After completing the NPDES permit rating worksheet, EPA classified the permittee as a minor discharger receiving 70 points. A total of 80 points is required for classification as a major discharger. II. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY The Fena WTP treats approximately 10.5 MGD of water from Fena Lake for drinking water. Under normal operating conditions, the drinking water is treated by conventional clarifiers, multi-media filters, ultraviolet disinfection, and ultimately stored in a clearwell before distribution. Solids are removed from the clarifiers and sent to a sludge conditioning tank and belt filter press before being sent to a Navy landfill. Wastewater that goes through the belt filter U.S. Navy, Fena Water Treatment Plant NPDES Permit No. GU0020389 Factsheet Page 2 of 22 press is recycled to the headworks and reprocessed. Wastewater from the sludge conditioning tank is sent to two backwash settling tanks. The supernatant from the settling tanks is recycled to the headworks while the solids are sent back to the sludge conditioning tank. Solids from the belt filter press are sent to the Navy Landfill. In the past, mechanical failures or limitations in the system have also caused upsets resulting in overflows from different parts of the treatment system. This type of discharge is not authorized in the NPDES permit. III. DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING WATER The Guam Environmental Protection Agency (“GEPA”) adopted water quality standards (“WQS”) for different surface waterbodies, depending on the level of protection required. The WQS, revised in 2015, provides water quality criteria by surface waterbody classification. The Namo River is located within the area classified as Category S-3, low quality surface water(s). Category S-3 waters are used for commercial, agriculture, and industrial activities. (GEPA 2015). The facility discharges to the Namo River at latitude 13˚22’38” N and longitude 144˚40'51" E through outfall 002, which flows downstream for about three miles into Agat Bay. The Namo River and Agat Bay are not listed as impaired and no total maximum daily loads (“TMDLs”) exist for either receiving water. IV. DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE The discharge consists of overflows of clean-in-place washwater or maintenance washwater used to clean the filters used during the treatment process. During heavy storm events, typhoons, or lake inversions, decreased settling times experienced by the spent backwash tanks results in poor quality supernatant being recycled back to the plant headworks. As the quality of the recirculated water decreases, the fouling of the downstream processes increases, and a discharge occurs when the 549,000 gallon backwash tank overflows. Specifically, tank B589 is connected to the emergency outfall 002 and overflows from this tank are discharged via the outfall. A. Application Discharge Data As part of the application for permit renewal, the permittee provided estimated effluent characteristics including the following pollutants, which are believed to be present: total residual chlorine, color, fluoride, nitrate-nitrate (as N), total aluminum, and total barium. Estimated values were provided as the facility has not discharged during the last 10 years. U.S. Navy, Fena Water Treatment Plant NPDES Permit No. GU0020389 Factsheet Page 3 of 22 V. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PERMIT TERM Table 1. Changes from previous permit term Permit Previous Permit Re-issued permit Reason for change Condition (2010 – 2015) (2016 – 2021) Effluent Contains effluent Removes effluent The permittee has not discharge during the last Limitations limits for arsenic, lead, limits for arsenic, 10 years. No reasonable potential exists for and manganese. lead, and arsenic and lead. Previous limits were based on manganese. the 401 water quality certification from GEPA. For manganese, the previous permit incorrectly used a marine water quality standard for manganese. There is no freshwater standard. Contains a 2.0 mg/L Revises the The revised aluminum limitation is based on aluminum effluent aluminum effluent GEPA’s water quality standard of 1.00 mg/L limit, as a daily limitation to be 1.0 because there is reasonable potential for a maximum. mg/L, as a daily discharge to exceed this standard. maximum. Contains a 2.0 ug/L Revises the GEPA’s water quality standard includes a mercury effluent limit, mercury effluent standard of 0.051 ug/L for organisms only. Per as a daily maximum. limit to be 0.051 GEPA’s water quality standards, the organisms ug/L, as a daily only standard applies to S-3 waters. There is maximum. reasonable potential to exceed this standard. Contains a 100 ug/L Revises the zinc The revised zinc limitation is based on GEPA’s zinc effluent limit, as a effluent limit to be water quality standard, acute aquatic life, of 120 daily maximum. 120 ug/L, as a daily ug/L because there is reasonable potential for a maximum. discharge to exceed this standard. Contained narrative Revised narrative The receiving water, the Namo River, is an S-3 effluent limitations effluent limitations water, per GEPA’s water quality standards. based on S-2 waters. to be based on S-3 waters. Contained annual Revised all The discharge is intermittent and monitoring monitoring monitoring to be should be conducted during the discharge to requirements for TDS, once per discharge. ensure data is available to assess compliance nitrate-nitrate (as N), with effluent limitations. fluoride, cadmium, chromium VI, selenium, and silver. Discharge N/A. Clarifies the only The previous permit called any unauthorized Prohibitions authorized discharge, such as overflows from other parts of discharge is for the treatment plant, as an upset. However, upset outfall 002, which is defined in 40 CFR 122.41(n). The reissued consists of permit clarifies that discharges from other parts overflows from the of the treatment plant are not authorized. backwash settling tank(s). The permit also contains electronic reporting requirements for discharge monitoring (DMRs), which are consistent with EPA’s final rule, NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, effective U.S. Navy, Fena Water Treatment Plant NPDES Permit No. GU0020389 Factsheet Page 4 of 22 December 2015, as well as EPA’s final rule, Use of Sufficiently Sensitive Test Methods for Permit Applications and Reporting, effective September 2014. VI. DETERMINATION OF NUMERICAL EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS EPA developed effluent limitations and monitoring requirements in the permit based on an evaluation of the technology used to treat the pollutant (e.g., “technology-based effluent limits”) and the water quality standards applicable to the receiving water (e.g., “water quality-based effluent limits”). EPA established, in the permit, the most stringent of the applicable technology- based or water quality-based standards, as described below. A. Applicable Technology-Based Effluent Limitations There are no applicable national or Guam criteria for drinking water treatment plants. There are, however, NPDES general permits for the water treatment industry in other states that contain technology-based effluent limits (TBELs) based on best professional judgement. The previous permit compared such TBELs for drinking water treatment plants in 4 states (Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Washington). The table below contains an updated comparison of these 4 states and includes an additional 5 general permits (for Alabama, Arkansas, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, Ohio, and Oklahoma)1. The additional general permits were considered during this renewal because the permits included an aluminum effluent limit and were recently issued. Table 2. Maximum Daily Limits from State General Permit Examples State2 Settleable TRC Aluminum TDS TSS Solids (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) Alabama -- 0.019 -- -- 45.00 Arkansas -- <0.100 2.00 -- 30.00 instant max Massachusetts and -- <0.100 -- -- 50.00 New Hampshire Mississippi -- 0.019 -- -- 45.00 1 Many general permits included effluent limits for other types of metals, like iron, manganese or arsenic, dependent on the type of source water and type of treatment process. Since this facility
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fruit Bats Comprised of Only a Few Individuals, Also Previously Located by the Micronesian Megapode Team, Was Confirmed from the Helicopter Search of SA Col
    Population Assessment of the Mariana Fruit Bat (Pteropus mariannus mariannus) on Anatahan, Sarigan, Guguan, Alamagan, Pagan, Agrihan, Asuncion, and Maug; 15 June – 10 July 2010 Administrative Report Pteropus mariannus mariannus at a roost on Pagan, Photograph by E. W. Valdez Ernest W. Valdez U. S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center, Arid Lands Field Station Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 Administrative Reports are considered to be unpublished and may not be cited or quoted except in follow-up administrative reports to the same Federal agency or unless the agency releases the report to the public. Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 3 METHODS AND MATERIALS ....................................................................................................................... 4 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 SARIGAN (15–16 June 2010) .................................................................................................................... 7 GUGUAN (17–18 June 2010) ..................................................................................................................... 7 ALAMAGAN (19–21 June 2010; 10 July 2010)
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Role of Bats in Emerging Zoonoses
    12 ISSN 1810-1119 FAO ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND HEALTH manual INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF BATS IN EMERGING ZOONOSES Balancing ecology, conservation and public health interest Cover photographs: Left: © Jon Epstein. EcoHealth Alliance Center: © Jon Epstein. EcoHealth Alliance Right: © Samuel Castro. Bureau of Animal Industry Philippines 12 FAO ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND HEALTH manual INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF BATS IN EMERGING ZOONOSES Balancing ecology, conservation and public health interest Edited by Scott H. Newman, Hume Field, Jon Epstein and Carol de Jong FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2011 Recommended Citation Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. 2011. Investigating the role of bats in emerging zoonoses: Balancing ecology, conservation and public health interests. Edited by S.H. Newman, H.E. Field, C.E. de Jong and J.H. Epstein. FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No. 12. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Bat Society Newsletter
    The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter Number 18 June 2002 The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter, Number 18, June 2002 - Instructions for contributors - The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter will accept contributions under one of the following two sections, Research Papers, and all other articles or notes. There are two deadlines each year: 21 st March for the April issue, and 21 st October for the November issue. The Editor reserves the right to hold over contributions for subsequent issues of the Newsletter , and meeting the deadline is not a guarantee of immediate publication. Opinions expressed in contributions to the Newsletter are the responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australasian Bat Society, its Executive or members. For consistency, the following guidelines should be followed: • Emailed electronic copy of manuscripts or articles, sent as an attachment, is the preferred method of submission. Manuscripts can also be sent on 3½” floppy disk. Faxed and hard copy manuscripts will be accepted but reluctantly!! All submissions are to be sent to the Newsletter Editor at the email or postal address below. • Electronic copy should be in 11 point Arial font, left and right justified with 1.6mm left and right margins. Please use Microsoft Word; any version is acceptable. • Manuscripts should be submitted in clear, concise English and free from typographical and spelling errors. Please leave two spaces after each sentence. • Research Papers should ideally include: Title; Names and addresses of authors; Abstract (approx. 200 words); Introduction; Materials and methods; Results, Discussion and References. References should conform to the Harvard System (author-date).
    [Show full text]
  • Population Size and Natural History of Mariana Fruit Bats
    Population Size and Natural History ofMariana Fruit Bats (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) on Sarigan, Mariana Islands1 Gary J. Wiles2,3 and Nathan C. Johnson4 Abstract: Based on count results, we estimated the population of Mariana fruit bats (Pteropus mariannus Desmarest) on Sarigan, Mariana Islands, to number 150-200 bats in 1999, 185-235 bats in 2000, and about 300-400 bats in 2001. Our results, plus those of two previous surveys, indicate that bat abundance on the island probably remained relatively stable at about 125-235 animals during much of the period from 1983 to 2000, then increased suddenly in 2001, most likely due to immigration from a neighboring island. Sarigan's population differs from those of larger islands in the archipelago by usually having smaller roost sizes, typically 3-75 bats, and large numbers of solitary bats that at times com­ prise up to half of the population. Colonies and smaller aggregations were composed primarily ofharems with multiple females, whereas a nearly equal sex ratio occurred among solitary animals. Colonies roosted in isolated coconut trees in open grasslands and in native forest stands ofvarious sizes, but avoided dense coconut forest. An estimated 30-50% of harem and solitary females pos­ sessed young in July 1999. Bats were recorded feeding on just six species of plants, which partly reflects the island's impoverished flora. We speculate that fruit bat abundance on Sarigan is limited primarily by food availability rather than hunting losses, in contrast to some other islands in the Marianas. Our study supports the contention that populations of P. mariannus in the northern Mar­ ianas are usually sedentary, but that interisland movements of larger numbers of bats may occur rarely.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Trends in Bat Populations of the United States and Territories: Problems and Prospects: U.S
    MonitoringMonitoringMonitoring TTTrends in Bat Populations of the United SSthe tates andandtates TTTerritories:erritories:erritories: Problems and Prospects Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD/ITR–2003-0003 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey To purchase this report, contact the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161 (call toll free 1-800-553-6847), or the Defense Technical Information Center, 8725 Kingman Rd., Suite 0944, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6218. Cover photograph by Thomas J. O’Shea U.S. Geological Survey MonitoringMonitoringMonitoring TTTrends in Bat Populations of the United States andandtates TTTerritories:erritories:erritories: Problems and Prospects Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD/ITR–2003-0003 By T.J. O’Shea M.A. Bogan Editors U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Suggested citation: O’Shea, T.J. and Bogan, M.A., eds., 2003, Monitoring trends in bat populations of the United States and territories: problems and prospects: U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Discipline, Information and Technology Report, USGS/BRD/ITR--2003–0003, 274 p. ii ContentsContentsContents Page Introduction (T.J. O’Shea and M.A. Bogan) ............................................................................................ 1 Bats of the United States and Territories .......................................................................................................................2 Problems and Prospects for Monitoring Trends in Bat Populations
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Bat Count Philippines
    Final Report Bat Count Philippines CLP Project Identification Number: 001706F Host country: Philippines Site location: field work and training: Protected areas, nation-wide central office: Dumaguete City, Negros OR Dates of fieldwork: January 2006 – July 2011 Collaborating institutions: International Bat Conservation International (BCI) IUCN, Species Survival Commission, Bat Specialist Group Lubee Bat Conservancy Southeast Asia Bat Coordinating Research Unit (SEABCRU) United Nations, Food and Agriculture Organization, Emergency Prevention System (EMPRES) for Transboundary Animal and Plant Pests and Diseases University of Montana (UM) University of the Philippines-Los Baños (UPLB) Wildlife Conservation Society of the Philippines (WCSP) Philippines Philippines Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Protected Area and Wildlife Bureau (DENR-PAWB) Silliman University University of the Philippines, Mindanao University of the Philippines, Los Baños Isabela State University Mindanao State University Leyte State University Center for Tropical Conservation Studies Philippine Endangered Species Conservation Project Cebu Biodiversity Conservation Foundation Soil and Water Conservation Foundation Calinawan United Farmer’s Association Cienda San Vicente Farmers’ Association Katala Foundation CROC Project Ecology Center, Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority 1 Overall Aim: To promote flying fox conservation in the Philippines through baseline research and capacity building. Author: Tammy Mildenstein, PhD Candidate, Fish and Wildlife Biology, University
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts 47Th Annual Symposium North American Society for Bat
    Abstracts 47th Annual Symposium North American Society for Bat Research Knoxville, TN, USA October 18-21, 2017 Local Hosts Gary McCracken & Emma Willcox Program Directors Gary Kwiecinski, Frank Bonaccorso, Shahroukh Mistry, Riley Bernard and Luis Viquez-R. NASBR appreciates the support it receives from its sponsors. For information on sponsoring a future conference please contact the NASBR Board of Directors or visit www.nasbr.org Conference Sponsors Diamond Silver Bronze Supporter Student Award Sponsors Abstracts 47th Annual Symposium of the North American Society for Bat Research Knoxville, TN, USA th th October 18 – 21 , 2017 Local Hosts: Gary McCracken and Emma Willcox NASBR Program Directors: Gary Kwiecinski, Frank Bonaccorso, Shahroukh Mistry, Riley Bernard and Luis Viquez-R. Abstracts below for both platform and poster presentations are listed alphabetically by first author’s last name. Contact information for authors attending the 47th NASBR Symposium is listed in the printed Program. New Records of Bats from the Southern Kalahari Desert, Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, South Africa Rick A. Adams1 and Gary Kwiecinski2 1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, USA; 2 Department of Biology, University of Scranton, Scranton, USA Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park stretches across northwestern South Africa eastward into Botswana. The park lies largely within the southern Kalahari Desert ecosystem where the dry river beds of the Auob and Nassob rivers reach confluence. Although these rivers run about once every 100 years, or shortly after large thunderstorms, underground flows and seeps provide consistent water for the parks sparse vegetation and diverse wildlife. No formal studies on bats at Kgalagadi Park have occurred, but molossids were known to occupying several of the chalets at tourist camps.
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Thesis
    MASTER’S THESIS ‘Megabats’ Stephen Turnbull Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science Aarhus University, Denmark [email protected] Supervisor: Associate Professor Jens M. Olesen Cover photograph: Dorte Nyhagen Introduction Why megabats? A brief explanation of my experiences with megabats. I first came across megabats when studying for my honours project at Aberdeen University under the supervision of Professor Paul Racey – an intimidating yet extremely likeable giant of the bat world. I was to study Pteropus rodricensis, the famed golden fruit bat, endemic to the island of Rodrigues; a tiny far-flung speck in the Indian Ocean, politically aligned with Mauritius. I had some idea of what to expect, but no firm plans of how to carry out my studies, relying instead on my confident ability to improvise. Upon arrival, the island presented itself as a catalogue of environmental short-sightedness and ecological collapse, yet the fruit bats clung on to their perilous existence, saved from extinction by the irregular topography of some parts of the island. In a near- vertical and densely vegetated gorge, the bats could roost in peace during the day, flying to their feeding sites each evening at dusk, their destinations presumably carefully planned the previous night. I quickly came to realise a number of problems inherently linked with the study of fruit-bats. Firstly, they’re nocturnal. This presents a whole host of difficulties, not least of which being the absence of daylight. Secondly, there was no way in which to access their roost site, and even if I could, my clumsy approach would disturb them.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploitation of Bats for Bushmeat and Medicine
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Chapter 12 Exploitation of Bats for Bushmeat and Medicine Tammy Mildenstein, Iroro Tanshi and Paul A. Racey Abstract Bat hunting for consumption as bushmeat and medicine is widespread and affects at least 167 species of bats (or c. 13 % of the world’s bat species), in Africa, Asia, across the islands of Oceania, and to a lesser extent in Central and South America. Hunting is particularly prevalent among the large-bodied fruit bats of the Old World tropics, where half (50 %, 92/183) the extant species in the family Pteropodidae are hunted. Pteropodids that are hunted are six times more likely to be Red Listed as threatened: 66 % of species in IUCN threatened categories (CR, EN, VU, NT), compared to 11 % of species in the ‘Least Concern’ (LC) category. However, there still appears to be an information gap at the international level. One third of the hunted species on the Red List are not considered threatened by that hunting, and nearly a quarter of the bat species included in this review are not listed as hunted in IUCN Red List species accounts. This review has resulted in a com- prehensive list of hunted bats that doubles the number of species known from either the IUCN Red List species accounts or a questionnaire circulated in 2004. More research is needed on the impacts of unregulated hunting, as well as on the sustain- ability of regulated hunting programs. In the absence of population size and growth data, legislators and managers should be precautionary in their attitude towards T.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Biology of Bats: Invasive Threats, Research Effort, and Extinction Risk
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2017 Conservation Biology of Bats: Invasive Threats, Research Effort, and Extinction Risk Jessica Nicole Welch University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Welch, Jessica Nicole, "Conservation Biology of Bats: Invasive Threats, Research Effort, and Extinction Risk. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4508 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Jessica Nicole Welch entitled "Conservation Biology of Bats: Invasive Threats, Research Effort, and Extinction Risk." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Daniel Simberloff, Gary McCracken, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Brian O'Meara, Alison Boyer, Mike McKinney Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Conservation Biology of Bats: Invasive Threats, Research Effort, and Extinction Risk A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jessica Nicole Welch May 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Jessica Nicole Welch.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Species Composition of Indigenous and Exotic Fruit Trees
    G.J.B.A.H.S.,Vol.5(2):15-24 (April-June,2016) ISSN: 2319 – 5584 Abundance and Species Composition of Indigenous and Exotic Fruit Trees in the Feeding sites of Fruit Bats: A Study Case of Kasanka National Park and Kafinda Game Management Area, Central Zambia 1Chansa Chomba & 2Caludia Sianjobo 1School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Disaster Management Training Centre, Mulungushi University, P. O. Box 80415, Kabwe, Zambia. Email: [email protected] 2C/O Mr. Sianjobo, Lusaka, Zambia Abstract We conducted a basic inventory of tree species composition, density and frequency, to establish baseline data on abundance and phenology of fruiting trees in the known fruit bats’ foraging areas. The study was carried out between November and December 2014 and January to February 2015, in Kasanka National Park and Kafinda Game Management Area. This area hosts one of the largest global concentrations of fruit bats estimated at ten million in one single locality every October – December/January and was therefore, found to be suitable for this study.Plot method using 20 m x 20 m square quadrats were set up inside the National Park and Kafinda Game Management Area. Each tree in the plot was identified and DBH taken at 1.3 m above ground. Tree height was determined using a tree height measuring rod and Haga Car Leiss altimeter. Identification of tree species was done by; i) direct observation, ii) use of a field guide, and iii) use of an experienced herbarium technician. Results obtained showed that there were 64 species of trees. Of these, 20 (approximately 30 %) were fruit trees, of which 16 (approximately 80 %) were available and accessible to fruit bats.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 3) 4 the CNMI 5 Activity - Which Direction? 6 Cnmllslands - Where People Live 7 the Oceans 8 the Continents 9 Oceans and Continents Review
    Our Island Environment Commonwealth ot the Northern Mariana Islands • .. ", •• .­ - / ~.~ "'" :~ - W;ldlife Conservahon & Restorahon Frogram, u.s. Fish & W;ldlife Serviee ~"- ~ 0 CNMI Division of Fish & Wildlife, Department ot Lands & Natural R.esources ~OR~~ Our Island Environment, Book 3 CNMI DFW, 2003 This project was funded by a grant under the Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, administered by the CNMI Division of Fish and Wildlife, Department of Lands and Natural Resources. The Our Island Environment series was revised and compiled by Kimberly Smith, Wildlife Education Specialist, CNMI DFW. The original Our Island Environment series was produced in 1991 in Saipan, CNMI. Funding for that project was provided by a grant from the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce through the CNMI Coastal Resource Management Office. The CNMI DFW would like to acknowledge the work of Michael Quinn (text and art), Larry Lee (text and art), and David Aldan (art). Some of their work was reproduced in this series. For further information contact CNMI Division of Fish and Wildlife, DLNR, Lower Base, P.O. Box 10007, Saipan, MP 96950; 670-664-6000. 1 Table of Contents Standards and Benchmarks (Grade 3) 4 The CNMI 5 Activity - Which Direction? 6 CNMllslands - Where People Live 7 The Oceans 8 The Continents 9 Oceans and Continents Review ....................................•.............. 10 The Three Forms of Water 11 The Water Cycle 12 Water - Review Questions "." "..".""".""".""..".." ".."."" "". 13 Water Cycle Maze ""." ..""" """"."." "" .." "" 14 Hidden Animals."."".." " "."" .." ""."" ".." "."." .."."" "."" "" 15 Amazing Insects"" "." """"""" " """""." .." "" " ". 16 Find the Insects "" " """ "".""." ................•............".
    [Show full text]