Field Guide to Aquatic Plants of Alabama
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
October 2020 Mpeda Newsletter 1 Cpf (India) Private Limited Cpf 3 Best Approach for Aquaculture
OCTOBER 2020 MPEDA NEWSLETTER 1 CPF (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED CPF 3 BEST APPROACH FOR AQUACULTURE PREMIUM FISH FEED PREMIUM SHRIMP FEED PREMIUM MINERAL PREMIUM PROBIOTIC PRODUCTS PRODUCTS Connect with Us: 2 OCTOBER 2020 MPEDA NEWSLETTER OCTOBER 2020 MPEDA NEWSLETTER 3 On the Platter MPEDA VOL. VIII / NO. 7 / OCTOBER 2020 Newsletter EDITORIAL BOARD K. S. Srinivas IAS DR. M. K. Ram Mohan Chairman JOINT DIRECTOR (QUALITY CONTROL) Mr. P. Anil Kumar Dear friends, JOINT DIRECTOR (MARKETING) Mr. K. V. Premdev The unlock process declared by the Government of India is slowly DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MPEDA MANGALORE) easing out the trade hurdles to a certain extent, though the markets are yet to warm up as expected. The year on year, the deficit in export EDITOR trade has reduced to 18%, as we analyze the export figures during DR. T. R. Gibinkumar DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MARKET PROMOTION April to October 2020. Though markets like USA and China have & STATISTICS) shown improvement, EU and Japan still remain at low key with fresh outbreaks of Covid-19. ASST. EDITOR Mrs. K. M. Divya Mohanan Meanwhile, it is reported that the Chinese Authorities are clearing SENIOR CLERK the consignments only after checking for Covid-19 nucleic material in the outer packs, and that delays the cargo clearance at the Chinese ports. This has also reportedly affected the payments from China to our exporters. The shortage of containers adds to the worries of the exporters to ship out seafood cargo from India to different destinations anticipating New Year demand. The General Administration and Customs China (GACC) has demanded a virtual inspection of two seafood processing units in India during the month and accordingly, two units were presented for virtual inspection by the end of the month to GACC on their preparedness on food safety, especially in tackling the Covid-19 contamination through seafood cargo. -
T 1. Alismatales.Indd
Iheringia Série Botânica Museu de Ciências Naturais ISSN ON-LINE 2446-8231 Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul Lista de Alismatales do estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil Vali Joana Pott1,3, Suzana Neves Moreira2, Ana Carolina Vitório Arantes1 & Arnildo Pott1 1,3Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Laboratório de Botânica, Herbário, Caixa Postal 549, CEP 79070-900, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil. [email protected] 2Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Botânica, Avenida Antônio Carlos 6627, Pampulha, CEP 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG Recebido em 27.XI.2014 Aceito em 21.X.2015 DOI 10.21826/2446-8231201873s117 RESUMO – A presente lista de Alismatales engloba quatro famílias: Alismataceae, Araceae (Lemnoideae), Hydrocharitaceae e Potamogetonaceae. O estudo considerou coletas nos Herbários do Mato Grosso do Sul (CGMS, CPAP), além do R para Alismataceae. O número total de espécies mencionadas para o estado é de 41, sendo duas introduzidas (Egeria densa Planch. e Vallisneria spiralis L.), já citadas e coletadas no Mato Grosso do Sul. A família mais rica é Alismataceae, e o gênero mais numeroso Echinodorus Rich. ex Engelm. (12 espécies), ca. 24% do total. Echinodorus cordifolius (L.) Griseb. no Pantanal é uma ocorrência disjunta. Sagittaria planitiana G. Agostini é a primeira citação para o estado. Palavras-chave: Alismataceae, Araceae-Lemnoideae, Hydrocharitaceae, Potamogetonaceae ABSTRACT – Checklist of Alismatales of Mato Grosso do Sul state, Brazil. The present list contains Alismatales, with four families: Alismataceae, Araceae (Lemnoideae), Hydrocharitaceae and Potamogetonaceae. Our study included collections of the herbaria of Mato Grosso do Sul (CGMS, CPAP), beside R for Alismataceae. The total number of species cited for the state is 41, two being introduced (Egeria densa Planch. -
Flowering Rush Biocontrol: Future Funding and Research CABI
Flowering Rush Biocontrol: Future Funding and Research CABI Needs Jennifer Andreas*, Hariet L. Hinz, Patrick Häfliger, Jenifer Parsons, Greg Haubrich, Peter Rice, Susan Turner * [email protected], (253) 651-2197, www.invasives.wsu.edu Flowering Rush Biocontrol Consortium © 2004, Ben • Began in 2012 Legler • Partnership between WA, MT, ID, B.C., AB, © 2004, Ben CABI, MN, MS… • Updates provided to Legler distribution list • Outline – impact data needs © 2004, Ben – test plant list Legler – funding Flowering Rush Impacts Mackey, Chelan Chelan Mackey, CNWCB • FR impact data needed – strengthen biocontrol petition – increase likelihood of additional funding • Economic impact – herbicide, mechanical costs • Ecological impact – system impacts? – salmonid impacts?!?!? Österberg Marcus • Human health/ recreational impacts /SXC Flowering Rush Taxonomy • FR in subclass Alismatidae • Mobot: – Order: Alismatales – 2 families closely related: Hydrocharitaceae & Alismataceae (includes Limnocharitaceae) • USDA PLANTS Database – 3 orders: Alismatales, Hydrocharitales, Najadales – 3 families closely related Mobot, verrsion 12, Stevens, P.F. 2001 onward; http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/orders/alismatalesweb.htm Draft Test Plant List • 42 test plant species selected • Category 1: genetic types of target weed species in North America – test at least most common genotype for both cytotypes • Category 2: NA species in same genus – does not apply • Category 3: NA species in other genera in same family – does not apply Draft Test Plant List • Category -
Creeping Burhead (Echinodrus Cordifolius) Plant Fact Sheet
Plant Fact Sheet Weed information is also available from the PLANTS CREEPING BURHEAD Web site at http://plants.usda.gov. Please consult the Related Web Sites on the Plant Profile for this species for Echinodorus cordifolius further information. (L.) Griseb. Plant Symbol = ECCO3 Description and Adaptation Creeping burhead is a creeping annual or short-lived Contributed by: USDA NRCS Jamie L. Whitten Plant perennial. The leaves are broadly heart shaped, 2-7 Materials Center, Coffeeville, MS inches long and almost as wide. The principal veins are conspicuous and impressed on the upper surface of the leaf blade. The petioles are 4-20 inches long, enlarged and spongy towards the base. The flowering shoot (scape) can reach 3 feet or more in length; scapes are upright when young, often drooping and rooting at the tips to produce new plantlets. Numerous whorls of flowers with white petals and greenish centers are located along the scape. Flowering begins in June and continues until frost. The fruiting heads are round, bur like clusters of small brown seeds. The native range of the species is from Maryland south to Florida, west to Missouri and the panhandle of Texas. It is usually found growing in swamps, wet woodlands, marshes, and ditches. There are some indications that it prefers a slightly shaded location. Best growth is generally on wetland soils with fairly high organic matter. Figure 1 Creeping burhead Alternate Names None listed. Uses Creeping burhead is an attractive aquatic plant that is recommended for use in shallow ponds and pools. It may also be suitable for use in constructed wetlands. -
Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Rare Vascular Plants
NATURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES OF VIRGINIA: RARE PLANTS APRIL 2009 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION DIVISION OF NATURAL HERITAGE 217 GOVERNOR STREET, THIRD FLOOR RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 (804) 786-7951 List Compiled by: John F. Townsend Staff Botanist Cover illustrations (l. to r.) of Swamp Pink (Helonias bullata), dwarf burhead (Echinodorus tenellus), and small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) by Megan Rollins This report should be cited as: Townsend, John F. 2009. Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Rare Plants. Natural Heritage Technical Report 09-07. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. Unpublished report. April 2009. 62 pages plus appendices. INTRODUCTION The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation's Division of Natural Heritage (DCR-DNH) was established to protect Virginia's Natural Heritage Resources. These Resources are defined in the Virginia Natural Area Preserves Act of 1989 (Section 10.1-209 through 217, Code of Virginia), as the habitat of rare, threatened, and endangered plant and animal species; exemplary natural communities, habitats, and ecosystems; and other natural features of the Commonwealth. DCR-DNH is the state's only comprehensive program for conservation of our natural heritage and includes an intensive statewide biological inventory, field surveys, electronic and manual database management, environmental review capabilities, and natural area protection and stewardship. Through such a comprehensive operation, the Division identifies Natural Heritage Resources which are in need of conservation attention while creating an efficient means of evaluating the impacts of economic growth. To achieve this protection, DCR-DNH maintains lists of the most significant elements of our natural diversity. -
The Vascular Flora of the Natchez Trace Parkway
THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (Franklin, Tennessee to Natchez, Mississippi) Results of a Floristic Inventory August 2004 - August 2006 © Dale A. Kruse, 2007 © Dale A. Kruse 2007 DATE SUBMITTED 28 February 2008 PRINCIPLE INVESTIGATORS Stephan L. Hatch Dale A. Kruse S. M. Tracy Herbarium (TAES), Texas A & M University 2138 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-2138 SUBMITTED TO Gulf Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Lafayette, Louisiana CONTRACT NUMBER J2115040013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The “Natchez Trace” has played an important role in transportation, trade, and communication in the region since pre-historic times. As the development and use of steamboats along the Mississippi River increased, travel on the Trace diminished and the route began to be reclaimed by nature. A renewed interest in the Trace began during, and following, the Great Depression. In the early 1930’s, then Mississippi congressman T. J. Busby promoted interest in the Trace from a historical perspective and also as an opportunity for employment in the area. Legislation was introduced by Busby to conduct a survey of the Trace and in 1936 actual construction of the modern roadway began. Development of the present Natchez Trace Parkway (NATR) which follows portions of the original route has continued since that time. The last segment of the NATR was completed in 2005. The federal lands that comprise the modern route total about 52,000 acres in 25 counties through the states of Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee. The route, about 445 miles long, is a manicured parkway with numerous associated rest stops, parks, and monuments. Current land use along the NATR includes upland forest, mesic prairie, wetland prairie, forested wetlands, interspersed with numerous small agricultural croplands. -
TNPS, Vol 42, Num 3
NEWSLETTER OF THE ssee N ne at n iv e e T TENNESSEE NATIVE EST. 1978 PLANT SOCIETY P la ty nt Socie Volume 42, Number 3 September 2018 Sunk Lake and Lower Hatchie National Wildlife Refuge Hike New Logo for the Tennesse Native Plant August 2018 Society o experience some of the best and most interesting he Tennessee Native Plant Society is very plants that West Tennessee offers, you have to be will- pleased to unveil its brand new logo in this T ing to brave the heat and humidity of the dog days of Tnewsletter. TNPS’s increasing involvement summer. I’ve heard whispers of the “botanical death march- with projects across various media sparked a desire es” I lead, so I wasn’t surprised that only among board members for a revi- 3 hardy folks met me at Woodard’s Store sion. In particular, the board wanted west of Henning for a day exploring a simpler, colorful, more contempo- Sunk Lake State Natural Area and the rary design that would update our Lower Hatchie National Wildlife Ref- image and could be identified easily uge. My thanks go out to Sue Williams at different scales, from the tiny pro- and Fred and Carol Bray for being such file picture for social media accounts troopers and making for a very enjoy- to Web sites like the Tennessee/Ken- able, yet hot, day. tucky Plant Atlas and publications We started the excursion with a visit such as the winter woody plant ID to Sunk Lake, one of many small lakes book. -
Plants of Retention Ponds and Drainage Ditches
Plants of Retention Ponds and Drainage Ditches The Greater Daytona Beach Area Bethune-Cookman University Daytona Beach, FL AUTHORS, EDITORS, and CONTRIBUTORS Editor in Chief, Author, Photographer, Illustrator Hyun Jung Cho Authors and Editors Don Spence Raymond Jarrett B-CU Student Assistant Indira Prajapati Justin Dahl Copyright © 2015 by Hyun Jung Cho All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book in any form. Page I Plants of Retention Ponds and Drainage Ditches Plants of Retention Ponds and Drainage Ditches The Greater Daytona Beach Area ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Field Assistants: Joseph White, Ali Simpson, Jared Zurbruegg, Christopher Schlageter Plant ID Assistant: Daniel J. Young Maps: Ali Simpson All participants of the International speedway Survey Day event on Oct 5, 2013 Donation: Some members of the Paw Paw Chapter of Florida Native Plant Society The project was supported in part by funding from: Bethune-Cookman University Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of any of the above organizations. Plants of Retention Ponds and Drainage Ditches Page II BIOSKETCHES OF AUTHORS and CONTRIBUTORS J. Cho is Professor of Integrated Environmental Sci- ence at Bethune-Cookman University. She is easily amazed by plants growing in ditches and loves her cat. She has Ph.D. in Conservation Biology and M.S. in Biology from the University of New Orleans, NOLA and B.S. in Biology from the Sung-shin Women’s Uni- versity, Seoul, Korea. Don Spence is a native of Daytona Beach and has lived in Central Florida most of his life. After high school he joined the U.S. -
Mississippi Flora. I. Monocotyledon Families with Aquatic Or Wetland Species
Gulf and Caribbean Research Volume 4 Issue 3 January 1974 Mississippi Flora. I. Monocotyledon Families with Aquatic or Wetland Species Samuel B. Jones Jr. University of Georgia Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr Part of the Botany Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Jones, S. B. Jr. 1974. Mississippi Flora. I. Monocotyledon Families with Aquatic or Wetland Species. Gulf Research Reports 4 (3): 357-379. Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol4/iss3/4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18785/grr.0403.04 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf and Caribbean Research by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MlSSISSlPPl FLORA. I. MONOCOTYLEDON FAMILIES WITH AQUATIC OR WETLAND SPECIES: bY SAMUEL B. JONES, JR. Department of Botany The University of Georgia Athens, Georgia ABSTRACT Keys, distribution maps, habitats, references, nomenclature, and notes are given for some 16 families of monocotyledons occurring naturally or naturalized in Mississippi. These families all contain one or more species which are found in aquatic or wetland habitats. They are: Alismataceae, Araceae, Cannaceae, Haemodoraceae, Hydrocharitaceae, Juncaginaceae, Lemnaceae, Marantaceae, Mayacaceae, Najadaceae, Pontederiaceae, Potamogetonaceae, Rug piaceae, Sparganiaceae, Typhaceae, Zannichelliaceae. INTRODUCTION The primary aim of this paper is to improve our knowledge of the aquatic and wetland plants of Mississippi. In studying a number of families for the Mississippi Flora project, I became aware of the limited collections available for study of many aquatic and wetland species. -
Download Download
ISSN 1536-7738 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society Volume 4, Number 1, December 2004 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society 2435 South Peoria Tulsa, Oklahoma 74114 Volume 4 Number 1, December 2004 ISSN 1536-7738 Managing Editor, Sheila A. Strawn Technical Editor, Patricia Folley Technical Advisor, Bruce Hoagland CD-ROM Producer, Chadwick Cox Website: http://www.usao.edu/~onps/ The purpose of the ONPS is to encourage the study, protection, propagation, appreciation and use of the native plants of Oklahoma. Membership in ONPS shall be open to any person who supports the aims of the Society. ONPS offers individual, student, family, and life membership. 2004 Officers and Board Members President: James Elder ONPS Service Award Chair: Sue Amstutz Vice-president: Constance Murray Conservation Chair: Chadwick Cox Secretaries: Publicity Chair: Kimberly A. Shannon Publications Co-chairs: Tina Julich Sheila Strawn Treasurer: Mary Korthase Constance Taylor Past President: Patricia Folley Marketing Co-chairs: Board Members: Lawrence Magrath Paul Buck Susan Chambers Kay Gafford Photo Contest Co-chairs: Melynda Hickman Patricia and Chadwick Cox Monica Macklin Newsletter Editor: Chadwick Cox Elfriede Miller Librarian: Bonnie Winchester Stanley Rice Website Manager: Chadwick Cox Northeast Chapter Chair: Constance Murray Mailing Committee Chair: Karen Haworth Central Chapter Chair: Sharon McCain Color Oklahoma Committee Chair: Cross-timbers Chapter Chair: Constance Murray Suzanne -
The Classification, Distribution, Control and Economic Importance of Aquatic Plants
International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1(2): 118-128, 2012 ISSN: 2049-8411 E-ISSN: 2049-842X © Maxwell Scientific Organization, 2012 Submitted: May 15, 2012 Accepted: June 23, 2012 Published: October 20, 2012 The Classification, Distribution, Control and Economic Importance of Aquatic Plants A.A. Oyedeji and J.F.N. Abowei Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Nigeria Abstract: The study reviews the classification, distribution, control and economic importance of aquatic plants to provide fish culturist information on some future challenges in culture fisheries management and practices. Aquatic plants have adapted to living in or on aquatic environments and constitute a problem in culture fisheries. They block navigational channels on the waterways and easily choke the propellers of boats. Many fish keepers keep aquatic plants in their tanks to control phytoplankton and moss by removing metabolites. Many species of aquatic plant are invasive species. However, some aquatic constitute the primary producers of aquatic ecosystems. They convert incident radiant energy of the sun to chemical energy in the presence of nutrients like phosphorous, nitrogen, iron, manganese, molybdenum and zinc. They are the foundation of the food web, in providing a nutritional base for zooplankton and subsequently to other invertebrates, shell fish and finfish. The productivity of any water body is determined by the amount of aquatic plants it contains as they are the major primary and secondary producers; hence, can be use as bio indicators. The study provides information on the meaning of aquatic plants, types of aquatic plants, characteristics of hydrophytes, adaptations, zonation, classification and control of aquatic weeds to provide the required information for fish culturists. -
Aquatic & Shoreline Plant Selection
HOME & GARDEN INFORMATION http://www.clemson.edu/extension/hgic HGIC 1709 1-888-656-9988 CENTER Aquatic & Shoreline Plant Selection Aquatic plant selection is extremely important in invasive when planted under ideal conditions. These the development of aquatic pools. You must have plants should be planted in pots, if they are used at some degree of balance between plants and animals all. Other plants are considered to be nuisance in your pool so that the water remains clear and aquatic species. major problems with maintenance and filters do not arise. Plants are very important in pools. They The following plants are listed with state and produce oxygen through photosynthesis, which federal agencies as illegal plants: allows maximum fish health. Plants also take up • African oxygenweed (Lagarosiphon major) excess nutrients, particularly nitrogen and • Alligatorweed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) phosphorus wastes from the fish. In certain • Ambulia (Limnophila sessiliflora) situations, ornamental pools can be stocked with • Arrowhead (Sagittaria sagittifolia) only plants, with excellent results. • Arrow-leaved monochoria (Monochoria hastata) While numerous aquatic plants are available for • Brazilian elodea (Egeria densa) water gardens, it is important to consider certain • Common reed (Phragmites communis) factors when selecting plants for a water garden. • Duck lettuce (Otellia alismoides) These factors include water depth, sunlight and how • Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum each species relates to its surroundings. You can spicatum) obtain most plants from local garden centers or • Exotic burreed (Sparganium erectum) catalogs, but in many instances you can harvest • Giant salvinia (Salvinia auriculata, S. wild plants for use in garden ponds with proper biloba, S. herzogii, S. molesta) permission.