The Vascular Flora of the Natchez Trace Parkway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Vascular Flora of the Natchez Trace Parkway THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (Franklin, Tennessee to Natchez, Mississippi) Results of a Floristic Inventory August 2004 - August 2006 © Dale A. Kruse, 2007 © Dale A. Kruse 2007 DATE SUBMITTED 28 February 2008 PRINCIPLE INVESTIGATORS Stephan L. Hatch Dale A. Kruse S. M. Tracy Herbarium (TAES), Texas A & M University 2138 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-2138 SUBMITTED TO Gulf Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Lafayette, Louisiana CONTRACT NUMBER J2115040013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The “Natchez Trace” has played an important role in transportation, trade, and communication in the region since pre-historic times. As the development and use of steamboats along the Mississippi River increased, travel on the Trace diminished and the route began to be reclaimed by nature. A renewed interest in the Trace began during, and following, the Great Depression. In the early 1930’s, then Mississippi congressman T. J. Busby promoted interest in the Trace from a historical perspective and also as an opportunity for employment in the area. Legislation was introduced by Busby to conduct a survey of the Trace and in 1936 actual construction of the modern roadway began. Development of the present Natchez Trace Parkway (NATR) which follows portions of the original route has continued since that time. The last segment of the NATR was completed in 2005. The federal lands that comprise the modern route total about 52,000 acres in 25 counties through the states of Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee. The route, about 445 miles long, is a manicured parkway with numerous associated rest stops, parks, and monuments. Current land use along the NATR includes upland forest, mesic prairie, wetland prairie, forested wetlands, interspersed with numerous small agricultural croplands. The National Park Service (NPS) contracted the S. M. Tracy Herbarium to conduct an inventory of vascular plants over the entire length of the NATR. The inventory objectives were to document vascular plant diversity within the NATR, ascertain the location of threatened and endangered vascular plant taxa, and determine which of the extant plant species were invasive. These objectives were achieved through a combination of a literature search, herbarium search, and an intensive field inventory. Five (5) trips to the NATR were conducted beginning in August 2004 and ending in October 2005, to make field collections. Collections were made over the entire length of the NATR on each of the five trips. Vouchers were collected and processed in the field for subsequent identification at the S. M. Tracy Herbarium. Verification of several specimens required trips to Ft. Worth, Texas to utilize the collections housed at the Botanical Research Institute of Texas (BRIT). Processing of vouchers involved identification, label preparation, and mounting. These tasks were performed in accordance with NPS protocol. Vouchers for the study comprise a total of 167 families, 750 genera, and 2197 taxa (including infraspecific taxa). Significant increases in the number of grasses (Poaceae) and sedges (Cyperaceae) were added by the study team. Vouchers were collected by the team for 1154 native taxa, 212 introduced taxa and 8 taxa considered both native and introduced. Previous NPSpecies (NPS Database) records account for an additional 642 native taxa, 173 introduced taxa, and 6 considered both native and introduced taxa. 2 Field observations were made of two possible locations in Tennessee where Apios priceana B.L. Robbins (a federally listed endangered species) may exist. However, impacts on the two sites due to haying and roadside maintenance made the subsequent verification of this species impossible. The study team recommends the NPS reassess its maintenance activities with respect to mowing at sites where A. priceana may exist. Persistence of this, and any other endangered species, is doubtful if such sites are continually mowed to an 8 inch stubble height. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS An inventory of this magnitude would be impossible without the assistance of numerous individuals. The authors wish to express their thanks to the staff of the National Park Service’s Gulf Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network (Paul Conzelman – retired, Whitney Granger) and the Natchez Trace Parkway (Kurt Foote, Bill Whitworth, C. E. Miller Smith ) who provided invaluable logistics and resources both in the field, and in the office. A special thanks goes out to Whitney Granger, whose guidance and patience was, and still is, essential to the completion of this inventory. Throughout the course of this project numerous graduate and undergraduate students from Texas A & M University provided much needed assistance in the field and laboratory. Nena M. Phillips was involved in the project from the beginning and her knowledge, skills, and attention to detail were a critical asset. Mark Tietz, Callie Monk, Kayla Kruse, Mindy Gallardo, Ashley Mock, Tracy Evans, and Darren Pawlik spent countless hours in the field and herbarium collecting specimens, processing vouchers, entering data, and other less than glamorous tasks which facilitated completion of this inventory. Guy Nesom, Botanical Research Institute of Texas, provided expert assistance with the identification of several Symphyotrichum specimens whose identity had eluded the authors. The curators of the following herbaria provided specimen data or answered our inquiries: APCR, APSC, AUA, BBG, BRIT, DSC, ETSU, GH, HALA, HEND, HGCRL, HTTU, IBE, LAF, LRU, LSU, LSUS, LTU, MISS, MISSA, MMNS, MEM, MO, MTSU, NLU, NO, NY, STAR, SWMT, SWSL, TENN, THIB, TROY, UAM, UARK, UCHT, UNA, UNAF, UOS, US. And last, but definitely not least, our sincere appreciation to our wives, Nora Lee Hatch and Maggie Kruse, who steadfastly supported our ambitions, despite many long hours at the herbarium and the time spent away from home while in the field. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 LIST OF FIGURES 6 LIST OF TABLES 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 History of the Natchez Trace Parkway 8 1.2 Land Use along the Natchez Trace Parkway 10 1.3 Climate 13 2.0 METHODS 15 2.1 Literature Review 15 2.2 Herbaria Search 15 2.3 Field and Laboratory Methods 16 2.3.1 Field Collection Schedule and Methods 16 2.3.2 Specimen Identification 16 2.3.3 Voucher Processing 17 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 18 A. Kruse 2004 3.1 Literature Search 18 3.1.1 Review of National Park Service Sources 18 3.1.2 Review of Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi State Floras 19 3.1.3 Review of Regional (Southeastern United States) Floras 19 3.2 Herbaria Search 20 3.3 Field Collections 22 3.3.1 Field Schedule and Collecting Effort 22 3.3.2 Taxonomic Distribution of the Natchez Trace Parkway Flora 24 3.3.3 Nativity of Natchez Trace Parkway Flora 25 3.3.4 Longevity of Natchez Trace Parkway Flora 26 3.3.5 Growth Habit of Natchez Trace Parkway Flora 26 3.3.6 Endemism of the Natchez Trace Parkway Flora 27 3.3.7 Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plant Taxa of the Natchez Trace Parkway 28 3.3.8 Weedy and Invasive Taxa of the Natchez Trace Parkway 29 3.3.9 Verification of Vouchers at NATR Headquarters 30 4.0 THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY 32 5.0 REFERENCES 138 APPENDICES Appendix A Collection Locations by State, County, and Date 141 Appendix B Endemic Vascular Plants of Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee 186 Appendix C Locations of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plant Taxa on the Natchez Trace Parkway 190 Appendix D Alphabetical List (by Genus) of the Vascular Flora of the Natchez Trace Parkway 196 5 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 The Natchez Trace Parkway in the Southeastern United States 9 Figure 2 Moderate to Heavily Forested Sites 11 Figure 3 Mesic Upland Prairies 11 Figure 4 Lowland Wet Prairies 12 Figure 5 Forested Wetlands 12 Figure 6 Maintained Roadsides 12 Figure 7 Natural Areas 12 Figure 8 Hay Prairies 12 Figure 9 Grain and Fiber Crops 12 Figure 10 Un-mown Prairie Site - August 2004 24 Figure 11 Mowed Prairie Site - July 2005 24 6 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Natchez Trace Parkway Mileage by County and State 10 Table 2 2004 and 2005 Monthly Temperatures of Five Large Cities along the Natchez Trace Parkway 13 Table 3 2004 and 2005 Monthly Precipitation of Five Large Cities along the Natchez Trace Parkway 14 Table 4 Summary of Request for Specimen Records 21 Table 5 Summary of Field Dates and Sampling Effort 23 Table 6 Summary of Collections by Division 24 Table 7 Comparison of Study Collections to the Natchez Trace Parkway Headquarters Collections 25 Table 8 Summary of Nativity by Division 26 Table 9 Summary of Longevity by Division 26 Table 10 Summary of Growth Habit by Division 26 Table 11 Records of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plant Taxa on the Natchez Trace Parkway 29 Table 12 Verification of Voucher Specimens at NATR Headquarters 31 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 History of the Natchez Trace Parkway The influence of the “Natchez Trace” (Trace) in our nation’s westward expansion and the associated economic and political development is often understated. Since its earliest beginnings, the Trace has played a vital role in transportation, trade, and communications at a local, regional, and even national level. In use since pre-historic times, the Trace has been witness to a diverse array of travelers from many important eras in our nation’s history. As an economic route serving its earliest users, the American Indian, to its use by a multitude of European and American travelers, the Trace has provided a viable and convenient means of north to south travel. In contemporary times the roadway and associated lands have preserved countless examples of our nation’s scenic and historical treasures. Throughout history, the Natchez Trace Parkway (NATR) has entwined its way in the lives and history of the people and places of the southeastern United States.
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Mary K. Oxley Nature Center, Tulsa County, Oklahoma
    Oklahoma Native Plant Record 29 Volume 13, December 2013 A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE MARY K. OXLEY NATURE CENTER, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA Amy K. Buthod Oklahoma Biological Survey Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory Robert Bebb Herbarium University of Oklahoma Norman, OK 73019-0575 (405) 325-4034 Email: [email protected] Keywords: flora, exotics, inventory ABSTRACT This paper reports the results of an inventory of the vascular flora of the Mary K. Oxley Nature Center in Tulsa, Oklahoma. A total of 342 taxa from 75 families and 237 genera were collected from four main vegetation types. The families Asteraceae and Poaceae were the largest, with 49 and 42 taxa, respectively. Fifty-eight exotic taxa were found, representing 17% of the total flora. Twelve taxa tracked by the Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory were present. INTRODUCTION clayey sediment (USDA Soil Conservation Service 1977). Climate is Subtropical The objective of this study was to Humid, and summers are humid and warm inventory the vascular plants of the Mary K. with a mean July temperature of 27.5° C Oxley Nature Center (ONC) and to prepare (81.5° F). Winters are mild and short with a a list and voucher specimens for Oxley mean January temperature of 1.5° C personnel to use in education and outreach. (34.7° F) (Trewartha 1968). Mean annual Located within the 1,165.0 ha (2878 ac) precipitation is 106.5 cm (41.929 in), with Mohawk Park in northwestern Tulsa most occurring in the spring and fall County (ONC headquarters located at (Oklahoma Climatological Survey 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Protect Your Horses and Livestock from Toxic Plants
    Protect Your Horses and Livestock From Toxic Plants A guide to identifying and controlling common, toxic noxious weeds and other toxic plant species. Protect your horses and livestock from toxic plants: A guide to identifying toxic noxious weeds and other toxic plant species Written by Genyce Hanson, with Alison Halpern, Wendy DesCamp, and Kittanya Locken; further reviewing by Tim Miller, Jennifer Andreas, Tricia MacLaren, Anna Lyon, Joan Mason and Casey Gozart. Layout by Kittanya Locken, with Becca Sotelo. Noxious weed classification in Washington: Class A: are nonnative, invasive plants whose distribution in Washington is still limited. Eradication of all Class A plants is required by law. Class B: are nonnative, invasive plants whose distribution is limited in some regions of Washington State, but widespread in others. Class B noxious weeds are designated for mandatory control in regions where they are still limited or absent. Class C: meet the criteria of noxious weeds but control is not required by the State Weed Board; county weed boards may require control of Class C noxious weeds if they are a local concern. Please check with your county weed board to learn more about the noxious weed control requirements where you live. WSDA Quarantine List: The Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) maintains a quarantine list of plants whose sale or distribution is prohibited in Washington State. On the front cover: A palomino mare grazes in a safe, well-managed pasture with her foal. Photo credit: Sue Bird. On the back cover: Dairy cows enjoy a view of Rainier in a healthy, weed-free pasture.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
    [Show full text]
  • Western Prairie Ecological Landscape
    Chapter 23 Western Prairie Ecological Landscape Where to Find the Publication The Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin publication is available online, in CD format, and in limited quantities as a hard copy. Individual chapters are available for download in PDF format through the Wisconsin DNR website (http://dnr.wi.gov/, keyword “landscapes”). The introductory chapters (Part 1) and supporting materials (Part 3) should be downloaded along with individual ecological landscape chapters in Part 2 to aid in understanding and using the ecological landscape chapters. In addition to containing the full chapter of each ecological landscape, the website highlights key information such as the ecological landscape at a glance, Species of Greatest Conservation Need, natural community management opportunities, general management opportunities, and ecological landscape and Landtype Association maps (Appendix K of each ecological landscape chapter). These web pages are meant to be dynamic and were designed to work in close association with materials from the Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan as well as with information on Wisconsin’s natural communities from the Wisconsin Natural Heritage Inventory Program. If you have a need for a CD or paper copy of this book, you may request one from Dreux Watermolen, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707. Photos (L to R): Prothonotary Warbler, photo by John and Karen Hollingsworth, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; prairie ragwort, photo by Dick Bauer; Loggerhead Shrike, photo by Dave Menke; yellow gentian, photo by June Dobberpuhl; Blue-winged Teal, photo by Jack Bartholmai. Suggested Citation Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management.
    [Show full text]
  • Cucumber Green Mottle Mosaic Virus Keep an “Open Mind” and Question Your Observations Disease Cycle 2
    Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus Keep an “Open Mind” and Question Your Observations Disease Cycle 2. CGMMV cross-contaminated via mechanical transmission – people/equipment, debris and soil 1. Bees and other insects potentially disperse CGMMV in the field CGMMV-contaminated seed 3. Weeds around fields can be hosts/reservoirs for CGMMV direct sown / transplants Cucumber Green Mottle Mosaic Virus (CGMMV) Older leaves silver leaf flecks • Very stable and easily transmissible by mechanically and by plant debris in soil. • Distribution: Worldwide - thought to originate in Asia • Other Cucurbit Tobamoviruses (ZGMMV, KGMMV) distribution– Korea, ?? • Seed transmission has been reported most frequently in cucumber. Although Watermelon appears to be on the increase (Australia, CA,USA). CGMMV Host Range • Cucumber Melon Watermelon Bitter gourd Bitter gourd Gherkin CGMMV outbreak in Fresno area 2017 • Bottle gourd ; Opo round • Squash (pumpkin type; C moschata-C. maxima) • Korean melon • Japanese cucumber • Chinese bitter melon Weeds identified as Potential Hosts to CGMMV Family Scientific name Common name Apiaceae Heracleum moellendorffii Eosuri Boraginaceae Heliotropium europaeum Common heliotrope Lamiaceae Moluccella laevis Bells of Ireland Solanaceae Solanum nigrum Black nightshade Withania somnifera Indian ginseng Amaranthaceae Amaranthus blitoides Prostrate amaranth Amaranthus graecizans Mediterranean amaranth Amaranthus muricatus Rough-fruit amaranth Amaranthus retroflexus Redroot amaranth Amaranthus viridis Green amaranth Chenopodiaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Alien Flora of Catalonia (Northeastern Iberian Peninsula, Spain) Pere Aymerich1 & Llorenç Sáez2,3
    BOTANICAL CHECKLISTS Mediterranean Botany ISSNe 2603-9109 https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/mbot.63608 Checklist of the vascular alien flora of Catalonia (northeastern Iberian Peninsula, Spain) Pere Aymerich1 & Llorenç Sáez2,3 Received: 7 March 2019 / Accepted: 28 June 2019 / Published online: 7 November 2019 Abstract. This is an inventory of the vascular alien flora of Catalonia (northeastern Iberian Peninsula, Spain) updated to 2018, representing 1068 alien taxa in total. 554 (52.0%) out of them are casual and 514 (48.0%) are established. 87 taxa (8.1% of the total number and 16.8 % of those established) show an invasive behaviour. The geographic zone with more alien plants is the most anthropogenic maritime area. However, the differences among regions decrease when the degree of naturalization of taxa increases and the number of invaders is very similar in all sectors. Only 26.2% of the taxa are more or less abundant, while the rest are rare or they have vanished. The alien flora is represented by 115 families, 87 out of them include naturalised species. The most diverse genera are Opuntia (20 taxa), Amaranthus (18 taxa) and Solanum (15 taxa). Most of the alien plants have been introduced since the beginning of the twentieth century (70.7%), with a strong increase since 1970 (50.3% of the total number). Almost two thirds of alien taxa have their origin in Euro-Mediterranean area and America, while 24.6% come from other geographical areas. The taxa originated in cultivation represent 9.5%, whereas spontaneous hybrids only 1.2%. From the temporal point of view, the rate of Euro-Mediterranean taxa shows a progressive reduction parallel to an increase of those of other origins, which have reached 73.2% of introductions during the last 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • GIANT ULLEUNG CELERY Stephen Barstow1, Malvik, March 2020
    GIANT ULLEUNG CELERY 1 Stephen Barstow , Malvik, March 2020 Scientific name: Dystaenia takesimana Carrot family (Apiaceae) English: Seombadi, Sobadi, Dwaejipul, giant Ulleung celery, Korean pig-plant, wild celery, giant Korean celery Korean: 섬바디, 드와지풀 Norwegian: Ulleung kjempeselleri Swedish: Ullungloka, Vulkanloka The genus Dystaenia belongs to the carrot family or umbellifers (Apiaceae) and consists of two perennial species, one is a Japanese endemic (Dystaenia ibukiensis), and the other is endemic to a small island, Ulleung-do in Korea (Dystaenia takesimana). Genetic analysis (Pfosser et al., 2005) suggests that the larger D. takesimana evolved from D. ibukiensis rather than vice versa. The specific epithet takesimana is according to one reference to Takeshima Islet, which is disputed with the Japanese. Campanula takesimana is apparently found there. However, Takeshima island is also an alternative name for Ulleung-do, so this may be a misunderstanding. That Ulleung-do is Takeshima is confirmed on the following web site from the Oki Islands off Japan http://www.oki-geopark.jp/en/flowers-calendar/summer where it is stated that Dystaenia takesimana is also found there and is critically endangered: “This plant was designated as Cultural Property of Ama Town in 2012. It has only been discovered on the two isolated islands of Ama Town of the Oki Islands (Nakanoshima Island) and Ulleung-do Island of South Korea. It can be seen on the Akiya Coast in Nakanoshima Island. It is called Takeshima- shishiudo, as Ulleung-do was referred to as Takeshima” (see the map in Figure 1 for places mentioned here). Ulleung-do is a rocky steep-sided volcanic island some 120 km east of the coast of South Korea, the highest peak reaching 984m.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List For: Valley View Glades NA 418 Species
    Species List for: Valley View Glades NA 418 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location NA List NA Nomination and subsequent visits Jefferson County Glade Complex NA List from Gass, Wallace, Priddy, Chmielniak, T. Smith, Ladd & Glore, Bogler, MPF Hikes 9/24/80, 10/2/80, 7/10/85, 8/8/86, 6/2/87, 1986, and 5/92 WGNSS Lists Webster Groves Nature Study Society Fieldtrip Jefferson County Glade Complex Participants WGNSS Vascular Plant List maintained by Steve Turner Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acalypha virginica Virginia copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 2 3 Acer rubrum var. undetermined red maple Sapindaceae 5 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple Sapindaceae 2 -3 Acer saccharum var. undetermined sugar maple Sapindaceae 5 3 Achillea millefolium yarrow Asteraceae/Anthemideae 1 3 Aesculus glabra var. undetermined Ohio buckeye Sapindaceae 5 -1 Agalinis skinneriana (Gerardia) midwestern gerardia Orobanchaceae 7 5 Agalinis tenuifolia (Gerardia, A. tenuifolia var. common gerardia Orobanchaceae 4 -3 macrophylla) Ageratina altissima var. altissima (Eupatorium rugosum) white snakeroot Asteraceae/Eupatorieae 2 3 Agrimonia pubescens downy agrimony Rosaceae 4 5 Agrimonia rostellata woodland agrimony Rosaceae 4 3 Allium canadense var. mobilense wild garlic Liliaceae 7 5 Allium canadense var. undetermined wild garlic Liliaceae 2 3 Allium cernuum wild onion Liliaceae 8 5 Allium stellatum wild onion Liliaceae 6 5 * Allium vineale field garlic Liliaceae 0 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia common ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 3 Ambrosia bidentata lanceleaf ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 4 Ambrosia trifida giant ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 -1 Amelanchier arborea var. arborea downy serviceberry Rosaceae 6 3 Amorpha canescens lead plant Fabaceae/Faboideae 8 5 Amphicarpaea bracteata hog peanut Fabaceae/Faboideae 4 0 Andropogon gerardii var.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouriensis Volume 28 / 29
    Missouriensis Volume 28/29 (2008) In this issue: Improved Status of Auriculate False Foxglove (Agalinis auriculata) in Missouri in 2007 Tim E. Smith, Tom Nagel, and Bruce Schuette ......................... 1 Current Status of Yellow False Mallow (Malvastrum hispidum) in Missouri Tim E. Smith.................................................................................... 5 Heliotropium europaeum (Heliotropiaceae) New to Missouri Jay A. Raveill and George Yatskievych ..................................... 10 Melica mutica (Poaceae) New for the Flora of Missouri Alan E. Brant ................................................................................. 18 Schoenoplectus californicus (Cyperaceae) New to Missouri Timothy E. Vogt and Paul M. McKenzie ................................. 22 Flora of Galloway Creek Nature Park, Howell County, Missouri Bill Summers .................................................................................. 27 Journal of the Missouri Native Plant Society Missouriensis, Volume 28/29 2008 1 IMPROVED STATUS OF AURICULATE FALSE FOXGLOVE (AGALINIS AURICULATA) IN MISSOURI IN 2007 Tim E. Smith Missouri Department of Conservation P.O. Box 180, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0180 Tom Nagel Missouri Department of Conservation 701 James McCarthy Drive St. Joseph, MO 64507-2194 Bruce Schuette Missouri Department of Natural Resources Cuivre River State Park 678 State Rt. 147 Troy, MO 63379 Populations of annual plant species are known to have periodic “boom” and “bust” years as well as years when plant numbers more closely approach long-term averages. In tracking populations of plant species of conservation concern (Missouri Natural Heritage Program, 2007), there are sometimes also boom years in the number of reports of new populations. Because of reports of five new populations and a surge in numbers of plants at some previously-known sites, 2007 provided encouraging news for the conservation of the auriculate false foxglove [Agalinis auriculata (Michx.) Blake] in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]