PBN Transition Plan NORWAY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PBN Transition Plan NORWAY (EU) 1048/2018 Art. 4 PBN Transition Plan NORWAY Avinor AS Dronning Eufemias gate 6 NO-0154 OSLO NORWAY Tel: +47 815 30 550 [email protected] Document information Version: Revised after consultations Document ID: 20/04631-4 Status: For Competent Authority Approval Date last change: 05.11.2020 Authors(s): CAALV, CAETA, CARRI, OSHJH Document history: Version Date Name Changes Status 0.1 01.09.2020 CAALV First draft Draft 0.9. 11.09.2020 CAALV For internal comments For Comments 1.0 18.09.2020 CAALV, CAETA, For consultation For Consultation CARRI, OSHJH 1.1 05.11.2020 CAALV, CAETA, Updated after consultation process with operators and For Approval by CARRI, OSHJH airspace users Competent Authority PBN Transition Plan - NORWAY Side 2 av 51 rev.1.0 Table of Content 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction & Executive summary ........................................................................................................... 4 1.2 International legislation and obligations ................................................................................................... 5 1.2.1 ICAO A.37/11, ICAO GANP, EUR ICAO ............................................................................................... 5 1.2.2 EU legislation: EASA Basic Regulation and Implementing Rules ......................................................... 6 1.3 Norwegian Legislation .............................................................................................................................. 8 1.3.1 BSL G 6-2 and the Norwegian Aeronautical Navigation Strategy ......................................................... 8 2 Current and Future Air Navigation Services .................................................................................. 9 2.1 Airspace Structure .................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.1 En-route ................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.1.2 TMA ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.3 Arrival and departure – ATC airports ................................................................................................... 10 2.1.4 Arrival and departure – AFIS airports .................................................................................................. 10 2.1.5 Aerodromes ......................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.6 Currently available Approaches – ATC airports .................................................................................. 10 2.1.7 Currently available Approaches – AFIS airports .................................................................................. 11 2.2 Training: ATCO & ATSEP ...................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Operators capabilities............................................................................................................................. 11 2.3.1 Aircraft fleet equipage .......................................................................................................................... 11 2.3.2 Current operational environment ....................................................................................................... 12 2.4 PBN Implementation plans and future operational environment ........................................................... 13 2.4.1 Future operating environment ............................................................................................................ 13 2.4.2 TMA / TIA Future navigation concept ................................................................................................ 13 2.4.3 Aerodrome CTR / TIZ ........................................................................................................................ 19 2.5 STATUS PBN Procedures ..................................................................................................................... 20 2.5.1 RNP APCH to the Aerodromes ............................................................................................................ 20 2.5.2 Planned implementations and operations concepts ............................................................................ 20 3 Rationalization ........................................................................... Feil! Bokmerke er ikke definert. 3.1 Background and strategy ....................................................................................................................... 22 3.2 Consequences to ATS and CNS ............................................................................................................ 25 3.3 Contingency scenarios Airport and TMA/TIA ......................................................................................... 25 3.3.1 Local Scenario ..................................................................................................................................... 25 3.3.2 Regional Scenario ............................................................................................................................... 25 3.3.3 National and International Scenario .................................................................................................... 25 3.4 Contingency scenarios ........................................................................................................................... 26 3.4.1 En-route ............................................................................................................................................... 26 3.4.2 TMA / TIA ............................................................................................................................................. 26 3.4.2.1 Normal Operations ....................................................................................................................... 26 3.4.2.2 GNSS Contingency operations .................................................................................................... 26 3.4.2.3 Hazard Identification and analysis ............................................................................................... 27 3.4.3 Aerodromes: CTR / TIZ ....................................................................................................................... 28 3.4.3.1 Normal Operations ....................................................................................................................... 28 3.4.3.2 Contingency ................................................................................................................................. 28 3.4.3.3 Hazard Identification and analysis ............................................................................................... 28 Annex I: PBN Implementation status .................................................................................................. 30 Annex II: DECOMMISSIONING PLAN, per Nav-Aid .......................................................................... 33 Annex III: List of TMA and TIA with underlying airports ...................................................................... 46 Annex IV: List of SID/STAR for all Runway Ends ............................................................................... 48 PBN Transition Plan - NORWAY Side 3 av 51 rev.1.0 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction & Executive summary This (draft) document describes the transition into the PBN-environment for Norwegian Aerodrome Operators and ANSP. It should be noted that since the PBN Implementation project was completed in 2017 (initiated in 2013); with RNP APCH implemented at all eligible runway ends; this document focuses on the transition related to decommissioning and rationalization of conventional navigation aids and procedures. In 2018 the EGNOS coverage area was increased up to 70° northern latitude, enabling the addition of an LPV minima also for the aerodromes in on the northern tip of the Norwegian mainland. This inclusion will be completed and published in AIP Norway by the end of 2021. Furthermore, the implementation of RNP-AR procedures are ongoing where this has a benefit on safety og the environment. In a transition; after implementation, comes rationalization. The decommissioning will be based on ICAO guidelines, EU regulations and guidelines (EASA and Eurocontrol), and EU SJU implementation targets for Single European Skies. Decommissioning will take place in two waves; 1) from 2020-2024: rationalization of duplicated procedures and equipment. 2) from 2025-2030: rationalization to exclusive use of PBN; with only designated airports and airspace providing navigation services based on conventional procedures and equipment This implies that certain smaller airports, due to cost avoidance (“lifecycle management/end-of-life” considerations) and reduction of “sunk costs” will transition to “GNSS only”-service from 2025 onwards. Considering the strain in AIP services, including required re-design associated with the withdrawal of conventional procedures and airspace design alterations; all airports not designated as required in GNSS contingency situations
Recommended publications
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2017 THERE NOW ARE 4,256 SATELLITES ORBITING the PLANET, “There Was Nowhere to Go but 179 More Than a Year Ago
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017 THERE NOW ARE 4,256 SATELLITES ORBITING THE PLANET, “There was nowhere to go but 179 more than a year ago. Of the current total, 1,419 are operational. everywhere, so just keep on The number of satellites has grown impressively since KSAT had its rolling under the stars.” first satellite contact the night of May 17, 1968. JACK KEROUAC (1922-1969) IN “ON THE ROAD” KSAT has changed over the 15 years success for KSAT depends on its teams, Station in 1967 and the first contact we have been in operation. We’ve and partly because experience suggests in 1968. It’s worth remembering that consistently added to our portfolio of that we should take the best of the past this took place only 10 years after the That first satellite contact from Tromsø, Los Angeles, USA. Lamentably, our activities and sought synergies between with us when we prepare for the future. first satellites were launched. One of Norway triggered an industrial develop- Canadian station in Inuvik, NWT still our business areas. Whenever Satellite Hence, in 2017, we continued to focus the first Norwegian computers was ment that became Kongsberg Satellite awaits Canadian Government licenses Operations supports a new mission, it on customers, unconventional and installed at KSAT and paved the way Services (KSAT), now the world’s largest to attain operational status. The total also creates an opportunity for the flexible solutions, and technological for the digital revolution in Norway. ground station service provider. That number of antennas has grown to 138 Energy, Environment and Security development.
    [Show full text]
  • Edu Immigration ACCEPTED.Pdf (882.2Kb)
    ARTICLE Does education affect immigration attitudes? Evidence from an education reform / Henning Finseraas, Øyvind Søraas Skorge, Marte Strøm VERSION: POST PRINT/GREEN OPEN ACCESS This document is the author’s post print (final accepted version). The document is archived in the institutional archive of Institute for Social Research. The final publication is available in: Electoral Studies 2018, / DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.06.009 does education affect immigration attitudes? Evidence from an education reform∗ Henning Finseraas,y Øyvind Skorge,z and Marte Strømx Accepted for publication in Electoral Studies July 2, 2018 Abstract Empirical research consistently finds that people with high education have more liberal immigration attitudes. To what extent this relationship reflects a causal effect of education is, however, largely unknown. We rely on the staggered introduction of a major Norwegian education reform to get exogenous variation in respondents’ level of education. The reform lifted the bottom of the education distribution by increasing the compulsory years of education by two years. We find no significant differences in immigration attitudes between those who were educated in the old and the new education system. Our results suggest that if education has a causal effect on immigration attitudes, it is likely to operate on other education margins. ∗We would like to thank seminar participants at the Institute for Social Research, Frisch Center for Economic Research, and University of Bergen for comments on a previous draft of the paper. Funding from the Research Council of Norway is acknowledged (grant no. 270687). yInstitute for Social Research, Oslo, P.O. Box 3233 Elisenberg, 0208 Oslo, Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Ny Lufthavn I Mo I Rana
    Ekstern kvalitetssikring Prosjektnummer E033b Ny lufthavn i Mo i Rana Rapport til Samferdselsdepartementet og Finansdepartementet 15.03.2021 KS2 Ny lufthavn Mo i Rana – hovedrapport Superside Generelle opplysninger Kvalitetssikringen Kvalitetssikrer: Concreto AS Dato: 15.03.2021 Prosjektinformasjon Prosjektnavn og ev. nr.: Ny Departement: Prosjekttype: lufthavn i Mo i Rana Samferdselsdepartementet Lufthavnprosjekt, Avinor Basis for analysen Prosjektfase: Forprosjekt. Prisnivå: 2020 Tidsplan St.prp.: Prosjektoppstart: Planlagt ferdig: Andre halvår 2021 (samspill) Andre halvår 2026 Tema/sak Tiltakets samfunnsmål • Avinor skal ved utvikling og etablering av Prioritering 1. sikkerhet en ny lufthavn Mo i Rana legge til rette for av 2. ytre miljø et utvidet reisetilbud i tråd med resultatmål 3. kostnad markedsmessige behov og bidra til å styrke 4. kvalitet regionens mulighet for videre vekst. 5. tid • Lufthavnen skal dekke de markedsmessige behov (i tråd med trafikktall fra Urbanets ringvirkningsanalyse til SD, mottatt 29.mai 2015) for flyruter, charter og frakt på en måte som bidrar til verdiskapning, næringsutvikling og bosetting. Endringslogg Viktigste føringer for forprosjektet: Fastsatt styringsmål: Merknader: Prosjektet har ikke gjennomført KVU (eller KS1). Styringsmål (P50): Justeringer 2 320 mill. 2020- gjennomført kroner av EKS. Kostnadsramme (P85): 2 772 mill. 2020-kroner Kontraktstrategi Prosjektets anbefaling Prosjektet tilrår alternativ 1B, der arbeidet er organisert som én stor kontrakt med samspill på målpris, åpen bok og med insentivordninger i form av bonus/malus. Kvalitetssikrers anbefaling Avinor har ikke ferdigstilt vurderingen av kontraktstrategi. Vi tilrår forhold som bør inngå i denne vurderingen, bla. å ta ut U1 som en egen entreprise og vurdering av hvor langt samspillet skal tas før det lyses ut som totalentreprise og med muligheter for pris- og mengdereguleringer av særlig usikre deler av kalkylen.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropological Abstracts
    Anthropological Abstracts Cultural/Social Anthropology from German-speaking countries edited by Ulrich Oberdiek Volume 3.2004 ___________ LIT Contents Editorial 4 General/Theoretical/Historical Studies 9 Regional Studies Africa 133 The Americas 191 Asia 219 Australia & Oceania 261 Europe 267 Periodicals scanned 327 Author Index 295 Subject Index Editorial This reference journal is published once a year and announces most publications in the field of cultural/social anthropology from the German language area (Austria, Germany, Switzerland). Since many of these publications have been written in German, and most German publications are not included in major, English language abstracting services, Anthropological Abstracts (AA) offers an opportunity and convenient source of information for anthropologists who do not read German to become aware of anthropological publications in German- speaking countries. Included are journal articles, monographs, anthologies, exhibition catalogs, yearbooks, etc., published in German. Occasionally, publications in English, or French, are included as well if the publisher is less well-known and when it is likely that the publication will not be noted abroad. The present printed volume of Anthropological Abstracts (AA) (2.2003) includes no. www-4 of the internet version (www.anthropology-online.de ’ Anthropological Abstracts ’ no. 4.2003); the printed version has about 30% additional material, however. Starting from the present volume the layout (size of script etc.) has been changed to ensure better readability. Some technical remarks This reference journal uses a combined and flexible approach of representation: While in most cases abstracts are supplied, for some anthologies and journals (e.g., Zeitschrift für Kulturaustausch, Kea) - because of space limitations - the Current Contents principle is applied, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • PORT of NARVIK Arctic-Hub
    PORT OF NARVIK Arctic-Hub Narvik is a part of the CORE EU TEN-T rail, port and road Network 1 Arctic-Hub The geographic location of Narvik as a hub/transit port is strategically excellent in order to move goods to and from the region (north/south and east/west) as well as within the region itself. The port of Narvik is incorporated in EU’s TEN-T CORE NETWORK. On-dock rail connects with the international railway network through Sweden for transport south and to the European continent, as well as through Finland for markets in Russia and China. Narvik is the largest port in the Barents Region and an important maritime town in terms of tonnage. Important for the region Sea/port Narvik’s location, in relation to the railway, road, sea and airport, Ice-free, deep sea port which connects all other modes of makes the Port of Narvik a natural logistics intersection. transport and the main fairway for shipping. Rail Airport: The port of Narvik operates as a hub for goods transported by Harstad/Narvik Airport, Evenes is the largest airport in North- rail (Ofotbanen) to this region. There are 19 cargo trains, in ern Norway and is one of only two wide body airports north each direction (north/south), moving weekly between Oslo and of Trondheim. Current driving time 1 hour, however when the Narvik. Transportation time 27 hours with the possibility of Hålogaland Bridge opens in 2017, driving time will be reduced making connections to Stavanger and Bergen. to 40 minutes. The heavy haul railway between Kiruna and Narvik transports There are several daily direct flights from Evenes to Oslo, 20 mt of iron ore per year (2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Angående FOT Ruter Fra 2022 Høringsuttalelse Fra Flyplassutvalget Ved Harstad/Narvik Lufthavn Evenes
    Angående FOT ruter fra 2022 Høringsuttalelse fra Flyplassutvalget ved Harstad/Narvik lufthavn Evenes Bakgrunn Fylkeskommunene overtar ansvaret for FOT-flyrutene i fylkene fra Samferdselsdepartementet 1. april 2022, ved igangsetting av ny kontrakt. Denne kontrakten planlegges for perioden 2022 – 2027. I forkant av kontraktsoppstart skal fylkeskommunen gjennomføre anskaffelse, og det er planlagt igangsetting av anbudsprosess sent 2020 eller tidlig 2021. Evenes har fra nyttår fått på plass en viktig FOT forbindelse ti og fra Bodø med 2 avganger daglig. Denne knyttes til eksisterende rute Evenes – Tromsø. Begge kontraktene betjenes av Widerøes Flyveselskap. For regionen er begge disse forbindelsene viktig både ift fylkeshovedstedenes offentlige tjenester og for private reisende. Flyplassutvalget mener: De store endringene i reisevaner som koronapandemien har ført til har også endret betingelsene for finansieringen av FOT-rutene. Billettinntektene utgjør en vesentlig del av finansieringen i dag. Under pandemien har i gjennomsnitt 40 % av billettinntektene forsvunnet. Hvis passasjertallene i 2022 bedrer seg, men likevel ligger 20% under normalen før korona utgjør det et tap i Nordland alene på 100 MNOK. I denne situasjonen vil operatøren kunne ha behov for 100 millioner ekstra for å opprettholde eksisterende rutetilbud. Dette er ikke utgifter fylkeskommunene kan pålegges. Flyplassutvalget er derfor av den klare oppfatning at det må være tilstrekkelig finansiering til stede fra staten for å opprettholde dagens tilbud og frekvens Evenes-Bodø og Evenes-Tromsø også fra april 2022. Vi vil understreke at 2 avganger pr dag i hver retning uansett er et absolutt minimum for å ivareta viktige samfunnsfunksjoner og nødvendig samhandling innad i fylkene og regionene Flyplassutvalget vil fortsette å jobbe i forhold til sentrale myndigheter, samt fylkene for å kunne beholde et minimumstilbud i en luftfart preget av korona tiltak og effekter.
    [Show full text]
  • AIBN Accident Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner, Oslo Airport, 18
    Issued June 2020 REPORT SL 2020/14 REPORT ON THE AIR ACCIDENT AT OSLO AIRPORT GARDERMOEN, NORWAY ON 18 DECEMBER 2018 WITH BOEING 787-9 DREAMLINER, ET-AUP OPERATED BY ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES The Accident Investigation Board has compiled this report for the sole purpose of improving flight safety. The object of any investigation is to identify faults or discrepancies which may endanger flight safety, whether or not these are causal factors in the accident, and to make safety recommendations. It is not the Board's task to apportion blame or liability. Use of this report for any other purpose than for flight safety shall be avoided. Accident Investigation Board Norway • P.O. Box 213, N-2001 Lillestrøm, Norway • Phone: + 47 63 89 63 00 • Fax: + 47 63 89 63 01 www.aibn.no • [email protected] This report has been translated into English and published by the AIBN to facilitate access by international readers. As accurate as the translation might be, the original Norwegian text takes precedence as the report of reference. Photos: AIBN and Trond Isaksen/OSL The Accident Investigation Board Norway Page 2 INDEX ACCIDENT NOTIFICATION ............................................................................................................ 3 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1. FACTUAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................. 4 1.1 History of the flight .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Norway, That Could Affect Norwegian Security and Damage National Interests in the Coming Year
    Analyses of Crisis Scenarios 2019 DSB ANALYSES OF CRISIS SCENARIOS 2019 1 DISASTERS THAT MAY AFFECT NORWEGIAN SOCIETY Issued by: Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection (DSB) 2019 ISBN: 978-82-7768-472-7 (PDF) Cover and design: Dinamo Printed by: ETN Grafisk, Skien 2 ANALYSES OF CRISIS SCENARIOS 2019 DSB SEVERE WEATHER Hurricane on the coast. Frøya municipality, Trøndelag. / SAMPHOTO WUTTUDAL TORE PHOTO DSB ANALYSES OF CRISIS SCENARIOS 2019 3 4 NASJONALTANALYSES OF RISIKOBILDE CRISIS SCENARIOS 2013 DSB 2019 DSB NATIONAL RISK AND THREAT ASSESSMENTS The DSB’s Analyses of Crisis Scenarios (ACS)1 is one of four threat and risk assessments published every year. The others are published by the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST), the Norwegian Intelligence Service (NIS) and the Norwegian National Security Authority (NSM). The PST’s primary responsibility is to prevent and investigate crimes against national security. The PST’s annual threat assessment discusses situations, usually in Norway, that could affect Norwegian security and damage national interests in the coming year. These include threats from state actors in the form of foreign intelligence services, their current intelligence targets and the services’ operational patterns in Norway. The assessments also deal with threats from non-state actors, especially threats of politically motivated violence by extremist groups or individuals. The assessments have a time horizon of one year and are published in the first quarter. The NIS’s primary task is to warn of external threats and support the development of Norwegian security, foreign and defence policy. The service publishes an annual assessment of the international situation and foreign threats of significance to Norway and Norwegian interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Årsrapport 2013
    Norges Luftsportforbund Årsrapport 2013 Årsrapport Norges Luftsportforbund 2013 1 Norges Luftsportforbund Årsrapport 2013 INNHOLD Side Styrets årsberetning 2013 3 Økonomisk årsberetning 2013 15 Vedlegg: 1 Ballongseksjonen 18 2 Fallskjermseksjonen 20 3 Hang- og paragliderseksjonen 25 4 Mikroflyseksjonen 29 5. Modellflyseksjonen 34 6 Motorflyseksjonen 39 7 Seilflyseksjonen 46 8 Komiteer, utvalg og internasjonale delegater 51 9 Ansatte 54 10 Klubber tilsluttet NLF med medlemstall 55 2 Norges Luftsportforbund Årsrapport 2013 1 Styrets årsberetning 2013 Luftsportstinget Luftsportstinget 2013 ble avholdt den 7. april på Radisson Blu Airport Hotel Gardermoen. Foruten de lovbestemte tingsakene vedtok luftsportstinget ny lov for forbundet, basert på NIFs reviderte lovnorm for særforbund, samt en endring i loven om ungdomsrepresentasjon i seksjonsstyrene. Det ble videre vedtatt en mindre endring i statuttene for hederstegn. Styrets sammensetning President: Rolf Liland 1.visepresident: Tor Schaathun 2.visepresident: Christina Wiig Styremedlemmer: Carita Gyldenskog Ranvik (ungdomsrepresentant) Mikael Klingberg (ballong) Ramsy Suleiman (fallskjerm) Christer Bonde (HG/PG) Kåre Halmleid-Østerud (*) (mikrofly) (til 19. november) Stein Erik Lundblad (*) (mikrofly) (fra 19. november) Asle Sudbø (modellfly) Stig Hoftaniska (motorfly) Håvard Gangsås (seilfly) Varamedlemmer: Tobias Veland (ungdom), Hans Rune Mikkelsen (ballong), Ingela Reppe (fallskjerm), Knut Kåstad Nygard (HG/PG), Stein Erik Lundblad (*) (mikrofly), Haagen Valanes (modellfly), Bjørn Skogøy (motorfly) og Mariann Moen (seilfly). (*) Kåre Halmeid-Østerud ba i august om å bli fritatt fra vervet som styremedlem (og som leder av Mikroflyseksjonen (fra 29. august)). Forbundsstyremøtet 19. november aksepterte anmodningen og personlig varamedlem Stein-Erik Lundblad overtok som fast styremedlem. Kontrollkomité: Håvard Rognerud (*) (leder - til juli), Lars Rasmussen (*) (leder – fra juli) og Inger Grimstad (medlemmer). Hans F. Wille (*) og Pernille Olafsen (varamedlemmer).
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Reform in Norway
    Regulatory Reform in Norway MARKETISATION OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES – STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES © OECD (2003). All rights reserved. 1 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: • to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; • to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and • to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). © OECD 2003 Permission to reproduce a portion of this work for non-commercial purposes or classroom use should be obtained through the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC), 20, rue des Grands-Augustins, 75006 Paris, France, tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Microwave Landing System MLS Area Navigation
    NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION ADVISORY GROUP FOR AEROSPACE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (ORGANISATION DU TRAlTE DE L'ATLANTIQUE NORD) AGARD Conference Proceedings No.410 EFFICIENT CONDUCT OF INDMDUAL FLIGHTS AND AIR TRAFFIC OPTIMUM UTILIZATION OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY (guidance, control, navigation, communication, surveillance and pkcessing facilities) FOR THE OVERALL BENEFIT OF CIVIL AND MILITARY AIRSPACE USERS And16 Benoit Symposium Chairman and Editor Papers presented at the 42nd Symposium of the Guidance and Control Panel, held in Brussels, Belgium, 10-13 June 1986. THE MISSION OF AGARD The mission of AGARD is to bring together the leading personalities of the NATO nations in the fields of science and technology relating to aerospace for the following purposes: -Exchanging of scientific and technical information; - Continuously stimulating advances in the aerospace sciences relevant to strengtheningthe common defence posture; - Improving the co-operation among member nations in aerospace research and development; - Providing scientific and technical advice and assistance to the Military Committee in the field of aerospace research and development (with particular regard to its military application); - Rendering scientific and technical assistance, as requested, to other NATO bodies and to member nations in connection with research and development problems in the aerospace field; - Providing assistance to member nations for the purpose of increasing their scientific and technical potential; - Recommending effective ways for the member nations to use their research and development capabilities for the common benefit of the NATO community. The highest authority within AGARD is the National Delegates Board consisting of officially appointed senior representatives from each member nation. The mission of AG- is camed out through the panels which are composed of exDerts aooointed bv the National Delecates.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of REFERENCES ITW GSE 400 Hz Gpus AIRPORTS
    Page 1 of 15 January 2017 LIST OF REFERENCES ITW GSE 400 Hz GPUs AIRPORTS Alger Airport Algeria 2005 Zvartnots Airport Armenia 2007 Brisbane Airport Australia 2013 Melbourne Airport Australia 2011-14 Perth Airport Australia 2011-12-13 Klagenfurt Airport Austria 1993 Vienna International Airport Austria 1995-2001-14-15 Bahrain International Airport Bahrain 2010-12 Minsk Airport Belarus 2014 Brussels International Airport Belgium 2001-02-08-15-16 Charleroi Airport Belgium 2006 Sofia Airport Bulgaria 2005 Air Burkina Burkina Faso 2004 Punta Arenas Chile 2001 Santiago Airport Chile 2011 Pointe Noitre Airport Congo Brazzaville 2009-10 Dubrovnik Airport Croatia 2014-16 La Habana Airport Cuba 2010 Larnaca Airport Cyprus 2008 Ostrava Airport Czech Republic 2010 Prague Airport Czech Republic 1996-97-2002-04-05-07-12-14-16 Aalborg Airport Denmark 1997-98-99-2012-15 Billund Airport Denmark 1999-2000-02-08-12-13-16 Copenhagen Airports Authorities Denmark 89-93-99-2000-01-03-07-09-10-11-12-13-14-15-16 Esbjerg Airport Denmark 2007-08-14 Hans Christian Andersen Airport (Odense) Denmark 1991-95-2015 Roenne Airport Denmark 1993 Karup Airport Denmark 1997-2016 Curacao Airport Dutch Antilles 2007 Cairo Intl. Airport Egypt 2015 Tallinn Airport Estonia 2004-05-14 Aéroport de Malabo Equatorial Guinea 2012 Vága Floghavn Faroe Islands 2015 Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Finland 1996-97-2000-05-06-09-10-13-14 Rovaniemi Airport Finland 2000 Turku Airport Finland 2014 Aéroport d’Aiglemont for Prince Aga Khan France 20007 Aéroport de Biarritz France 2009 Aéroport de Brest
    [Show full text]