DOCSLIB.ORG

Klassische Archäologie

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Klassische Archäologie HELLENISTISCHE UND KAISERZEITLICHE WEIHRELIEFS AUS DEM NÖRDLICHEN MYSIEN Ikonographie und Typologie einer Denkmälergruppe und ihre Bedeutung für die Religionsgeschichte einer antiken Landschaft Inaugural – Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der P h i l o s o p h i s c h e n F a k u l t ä t der Westfälischen Wilhelms–Universität zu Münster (Westf.) vorgelegt von Oliver Brehm aus Herford 1996 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 07.02.1997 Dekan: Prof. Dr. K. Hortschansky Referent: Prof. Dr. H. Wiegartz Korreferent: Prof. Dr. E. Schwertheim Meinen Eltern INHALTSVERZEICHNIS VORWORT V ABKÜRZUNGSVERZEICHNIS VII I. EINLEITUNG 1 I.1. Vorbemerkungen: Motivation, Stellenwert, Bearbeitungsstand 1 I.2. Methodik 11 II. KLASSIFIZIERUNG DER MYSISCHEN WEIHRELIEFS 16 II.1. Tektonik 16 II.1.1. Die einfache Bildfeldstele 20 II.1.2. Die Registerstele 27 II.2. Motiv und Komposition 37 II.2.1. Das Verehrungsrelief 37 II.2.2. Das Götterrelief 51 II.2.3. Die Sonderform der Registerstele 53 II.2.4. Die Sonderform der zusätzlichen Gelageszene 56 II.3. Die Stifter 60 II.3.1. Weihungen einzelner Personen 61 II.3.2. Gemeinschaftsweihungen 62 II.4. Chronologie 69 III. IKONOGRAPHIE UND TYPOLOGIE 79 III.1. Die Götterdarstellungen 79 III.1.1. Apollon 82 II III.1.2. Zeus 105 III.1.3. Kybele 113 III.1.4. Artemis 124 III.1.5. Hermes 135 III.1.6. Asklepios 140 III.1.7. Herakles 143 III.1.8. Dionysos 146 III.1.9. Zusammenfassung 148 III.2. Weihreliefs an einzelne Gottheiten 156 III.2.1. Apollon 156 2.1.1. Typus der Apollonreliefs 157 2.1.1.1 Format 157 2.1.1.2. Bildtypus 158 2.1.2. Inschriften 161 2.1.3.Verbreitung 163 2.1.4. Datierung 177 III.2.2. Zeus 182 2.2.1. Typus der Zeusreliefs 182 2.2.1.1. Format 182 2.2.1.2. Bildtypus 185 2.2.2 Inschriften 192 2.2.3. Verbreitung 202 2.2.4. Datierung 206 III.2.3. Kybele 208 2.3.1. Typus der Kybelereliefs 208 2.3.1.1. Format 208 2.3.1.2. Bildtypus 211 2.3.2. Inschriften 215 2.3.3. Verbreitung 218 2.3.4. Datierung 220 III.2.4. Artemis 222 III.2.5. Hermes 229 III.2.6. Asklepios 231 III III.2.7. Herakles 232 III.2.8. Dionysos 234 III.2.9. Reitergötter 236 III.3. Weihreliefs an 'Götterpaare' 241 III.3.1. Apollon und Artemis 241 III.3.2. Zeus und Artemis 250 III.3.3. Apollon und Kybele 253 III.3.4. Kybele und Attis 255 III.3.5. Apollon und Asklepios 257 III.3.6. Apollon und Hermes 262 III.3.7. Asklepios und Hygieia 263 III.3.8. Kybele und eine weitere Gottheit 265 III.3.9. Artemis/Diana und eine weitere Gottheit 266 III.3.10. Zeus und Kybele 267 III.3.11. Zeus und Herakles 268 III.3.12. Zusammenfassung 269 III.4. Weihreliefs an Göttergruppen 272 III.4.1. Kybele, Zeus und Hermes 272 4.1.1. Kybele und Hermes 281 III.4.2. Zeus, Apollon und Artemis 286 III.4.3. Zeus, Apollon und Hermes 294 III.4.4. Zusammenfassung 294 IV. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG UND AUSWERTUNG 298 IV.1. Apollon 298 IV.2. Zeus 322 IV.3. Kybele 330 IV.4. Artemis 340 IV.5. Hermes 352 IV IV.6. Asklepios 358 IV.7. Herakles 364 IV.8. Dionysos 368 V. SCHLUßBETRACHTUNG 372 V.1. Die Bedeutung der mysischen Weihreliefs: Nachleben klassizistisch bestimmter Formen oder neue entwicklungsfähige Form? 372 VI. KATALOG 401 V Vorwort Die vorliegende Arbeit ist die aktualisierte Fassung meiner Promotionsschrift, die im November 1996 der Philosophischen Fakultät der Westfälischen Wilhelms- Universität zur Begutachtung eingereicht wurde. Der späte Zeitpunkt der Veröffentlichung erklärt sich durch äußere Umstände. Eingearbeitet hat Verf. Kritikpunkte und Vorschläge der beiden Gutachter Prof. Dr. Hans Wiegartz und Prof. Dr. Elmar Schwertheim und die in den letzten Jahren erschienenen Untersuchungen, soweit sie das Thema direkt betrafen und neue Argumente in die Diskussion einbringen konnten. Daraus ergibt sich konse- quenterweise, daß nicht alle Neuveröffentlichungen, die sich mit dem Thema und dem in der Arbeit behandelten Zeitraum beschäftigen, erwähnt werden konnten. Mein Dank gilt meinem Doktorvater, Herrn Prof. Dr. Hans Wiegartz, der die Fertigstellung der Arbeit in vielfältiger Weise mit Rat und Kritik gefördert und unterstützt hat. Mein besonderer Dank gilt Prof. Dr. Elmar Schwertheim, der nicht nur das Korreferat übernommen hat, sondern die Arbeit angeregt und stets durch unermüdliche Gesprächsbereitschaft gefördert hat. In außerordentlich entgegenkommender Weise gewährte er mir Einblicke in das von ihm gesammelte Material, von dem einige bisher unpublizierte Denkmäler mit seiner Genehmigung in die Arbeit aufgenommen werden konnten. Für dieses keineswegs selbstverständliche Vertrauen möchte ich ihm ebenso danken wie für die Hilfe vor allem bei der Lesung und Interpretation der bisher unpublizierten Inschriften, bei Fragen zur historischen Topographie des nördlichen Mysiens, sowie für die Möglichkeit, die Objekte vor Ort studieren zu können. Frau Dr. Marielouise Cremer gewährte mir vor der Drucklegung ihrer Arbeit zu den 'Hellenistisch-römischen Grabstelen im nordwestlichen Kleinasien' Einblicke in ihre Arbeit und stellte mir vorab Ergebnisse und Photomaterial zur Verfügung. Dem regen Austausch habe ich viel zu verdanken. Mit Prof. Dr. Ulrich Hausmann konnte ich ausführlich über die Gattung der Weihreliefs diskutieren. Ihm verdanke ich zahlreiche Hinweise und Denkanstöße gerade auch zu methodischen Überlegungen. Die Dissertationsschrift als auch die überarbeitete Fassung sind natürlich nicht ohne die freundliche Unterstützung weiterer möglich gewesen: Herr Prof. Dr. Norbert Ehrhardt, Lehrstuhl für Alte Geschichte, Münster, verfolgte die Arbeit mit großem Interesse, ihm verdanke ich zahlreiche hilfreiche Hinweise und Anregungen. Für den fachlichen Austausch danke ich besonders auch Herrn Prof. Dr. Sencer Şahin, der mir großzügig Einblick in seine Materialsammlung gewährte. Weiterhin schulde ich Dank den Herren Prof. Dr. Thomas Corsten, PD Dr. Martin Flashar, Dr. Tomas Lochman und Prof. Dr. Engelbert Winter für wichtige Hinweise und Auskünfte. VI Frau Nese Kul-Berndt danke ich für die zeitaufwändigen Übersetzungen aus dem Türkischen. Die Photographin Frau Gisela Störmann hat alle wichtigen Photoarbeiten erledigt. Meinen Freunden im Archäologischen Seminar der Universität Münster und der Forschungsstelle Asia Minor, namentlich seien stellvertretend Dr. Carola Kintrup und Dr. Ulrich Holtfester für das Korrekturlesen der Arbeit genannt, danke ich für stete Diskussionsbereitschaft und zahlreiche Hinweise. Allen Helfern, Kritikern und Befürwortern gilt mein Dank auch dann, wenn ihre Namen hier nicht alle genannt werden können. Der 'Historisch-archäologische Freundeskreis e.V. Münster' hat mit einem namhaften Betrag die Aufnahme der Denkmäler vor Ort unterstützt und somit den Fortgang der Arbeit maßgeblich gefördert. Meinem akademischen Lehrer Prof. Dr. Max Wegner verdanke ich mehr, als ich an dieser Stelle ausdrücken könnte. Die Unterstützung durch meine Frau Dr. Christiane Brehm in privater und fachlicher Hinsicht war von unschätzbarem Wert. Ihr Rat und ihre Geduld in der Zeit des Dissertationsvorhabens haben die Fertigstellung der Arbeit erst ermöglicht. Der größte Dank aber gilt meinen Eltern, denen ich diese Arbeit widme. Ihnen verdanke ich nicht nur meine ersten, für die Wahl des Studienfachs ausschlaggebenden Kontakte mit der Welt des klassischen Altertums, sondern zudem die uneingeschränkte Förderung meiner Ausbildung in ihren unterschiedlichen Stadien. Ohne ihre Unterstützung wäre die Fertigstellung der Arbeit in dieser Form nicht möglich gewesen. VII Abkürzungsverzeichnis Es gelten die Zitierrichtlinien und Abkürzungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts von 2006 (AA 2005/2, 314-399); die antiken Autoren sind nach DNP III (1997) S. XXXVI-XLIV abgekürzt. Zusätzlich werden folgende Abkürzungen verwendet: Abmeier 1990 = A. Abmeier, Zur Geschichte von Apollonia am Rhyndakos, in: Mysische Studien, AMS 1 (Bonn 1990) 1-16 Amnestål 1989 = L. Amnestål, A votive relief in Stockholm, MedelhavsMusB 24, 1989, 19-30 Bélis 1986 = A. Bélis, L’aulos phrygien, RA 1986, 21-40 Bieber 1977 = M. Bieber, Ancient copies. Contributions to the history of Greek and Roman art (New York 1977) Bilabel 1920 = F. Bilabel, Die ionische Kolonisation. Unter- suchungen über die Gründung der Ionier, deren staatliche und kultische Organisation und Beziehungen zu den Mutterstädten. Philologus Suppl. XIV 1 (Leipzig 1920) Borbein 1968 = A.H. Borbein, Eine Stele in Rhodos. Bemerkungen zum spätgriechischen Grabrelief, MarbWPr 1968, 74-101 Brand 2000 = H. Brand, Griechische Musikanten im Kult. Von der Frühzeit bis zum Beginn der Spätklassik. Würzburger Studien zur Sprache & Kultur 3 (Dettelbach 2000) BullEpigr = Bulletin Épigraphique in der Revue des Études Grecques (REG) Carroll-Spillecke 1985 = M. Carroll-Spillecke, Landscape depictions in Greek relief sculpture, development and conventionalization. European university studies Ser. 38, Archeology 11 (Frankfurt a.M., Bern, New York 1985) Cook I-III 1914-1940 = A.B. Cook, Zeus. A study in ancient religion I-III (Cambridge I 1914, II 1-2 1925, III 1-2 1940, repr. New York 1964-1965) VIII Cook 1973 = J.M. Cook, The Troad. An archaeological and topographical Study (Oxford 1973) Corsten 1987 = Th. Corsten, Die Inschriften von Apameia (Bithynien) und Pylai, I.K. 32 (Bonn 1987) Corsten 1989 = Th. Corsten, Attu Kome, ZPE 77, 1989, 181-184 Corsten 1991 = Th. Corsten, Die Inschriften von Prusa ad Olympum I, I.K. 39 (Bonn 1991) Corsten 1993 = Th. Corsten, Die Inschriften von Prusa ad Olympum II, Die Geschichte der Stadt in der Antike – Inschriften unbekannter Herkunft im Archäologischen Museum Bursa, I.K. 40 (Bonn 1993) Cremer 1988 = M. Cremer, Der bewaffnete Dionysos, IstMitt 38, 1988, 179-187 Cremer 1991 = M. Cremer, Hellenistisch-römische Grabstelen im nordwestlichen Kleinasien 1. Mysien, AMS 4, 1 (Bonn 1991) Cremer 1992 = M. Cremer, Hellenistisch-römische Grabstelen im nordwestlichen Kleinasien 2. Bithynien, AMS 4, 2 (Bonn 1992) Deubner 1934 = O. Deubner, Hellenistische Apollongestalten (Athen 1934) Drexhage 2003 = H.-W. Drexhage, Der Kult des Zeus Olbios, in: E. Schwertheim - E. Winter (Hrsg.), Religion und Region. Götter und Kulte aus dem östlichen Mittelmeerraum, AMS 45 (Bonn 2003) Edelstein 1945 = E.J.
Recommended publications
  • Hadrian and the Greek East

    Hadrian and the Greek East

    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
  • Kretan Cult and Customs, Especially in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods: a Religious, Social, and Political Study

    Kretan Cult and Customs, Especially in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods: a Religious, Social, and Political Study

    i Kretan cult and customs, especially in the Classical and Hellenistic periods: a religious, social, and political study Thesis submitted for degree of MPhil Carolyn Schofield University College London ii Declaration I, Carolyn Schofield, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been acknowledged in the thesis. iii Abstract Ancient Krete perceived itself, and was perceived from outside, as rather different from the rest of Greece, particularly with respect to religion, social structure, and laws. The purpose of the thesis is to explore the bases for these perceptions and their accuracy. Krete’s self-perception is examined in the light of the account of Diodoros Siculus (Book 5, 64-80, allegedly based on Kretan sources), backed up by inscriptions and archaeology, while outside perceptions are derived mainly from other literary sources, including, inter alia, Homer, Strabo, Plato and Aristotle, Herodotos and Polybios; in both cases making reference also to the fragments and testimonia of ancient historians of Krete. While the main cult-epithets of Zeus on Krete – Diktaios, associated with pre-Greek inhabitants of eastern Krete, Idatas, associated with Dorian settlers, and Kretagenes, the symbol of the Hellenistic koinon - are almost unique to the island, those of Apollo are not, but there is good reason to believe that both Delphinios and Pythios originated on Krete, and evidence too that the Eleusinian Mysteries and Orphic and Dionysiac rites had much in common with early Kretan practice. The early institutionalization of pederasty, and the abduction of boys described by Ephoros, are unique to Krete, but the latter is distinct from rites of initiation to manhood, which continued later on Krete than elsewhere, and were associated with different gods.
  • Pythios and Pythion: the Spread of a Cult Title J.K

    Pythios and Pythion: the Spread of a Cult Title J.K

    Mediterranean Historical Review Vol. 22, No. 1, June 2007, pp. 57–69 Pythios and Pythion: The Spread of a Cult Title J.K. Davies The epithet Pythios/Pythion, unequivocally denoting the cult of Apollo of Delphi, came to have a very widespread distribution throughout the Greek world, comparable only to that of Zeus Olympios. Pre-Hellenistic attestations are summarily reported, showing concentrations (e.g., Attika, Argolis, Thessaly, Aegean islands, Krete), significant vacua (e.g., Boiotia, north-western Greece), and overlaps with the epithets Delphinios and Pythaieus. Likely periods and mechanisms of its spread are sketched, as are possible explanations (colonization, oracles, purification), though without overt preference for any one model of network-formation. Keywords: Apollo; Cult; Oracle; Purification; Distribution It is a cliche´ of scholarship that the terms Pythios and Pythion derive from Pytho, the earliest attested name for the cultic area later known as Delphoi,1 and that they came to refer unequivocally to Apollo as the principal god of the upper sanctuary there. They therefore belong among the ‘locational’ epithets of the god, parallel to Klarios or Didymeus, not among those derived from function or from association or identification with animals.2 As such, they pose a problem, for it was unusual for locational epithets to spread far beyond their primary sanctuary, still less to show such widespread attestation throughout much of the Greek-speaking world: Zeus Olympios provides perhaps the only true comparison, with even Eleusinian Demeter well behind. Their distribution therefore needs an explanation, and one which is couched not just in terms of geography or of the ‘profile’ of the god but also, and primarily, in terms of human needs and of the ways in which a specific cult could be transferred, or replicated/cloned, elsewhere.
  • Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period Ryan

    Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period Ryan

    Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period by Ryan Anthony Boehm A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Emily Mackil, Chair Professor Erich Gruen Professor Mark Griffith Spring 2011 Copyright © Ryan Anthony Boehm, 2011 ABSTRACT SYNOIKISM, URBANIZATION, AND EMPIRE IN THE EARLY HELLENISTIC PERIOD by Ryan Anthony Boehm Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Professor Emily Mackil, Chair This dissertation, entitled “Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period,” seeks to present a new approach to understanding the dynamic interaction between imperial powers and cities following the Macedonian conquest of Greece and Asia Minor. Rather than constructing a political narrative of the period, I focus on the role of reshaping urban centers and regional landscapes in the creation of empire in Greece and western Asia Minor. This period was marked by the rapid creation of new cities, major settlement and demographic shifts, and the reorganization, consolidation, or destruction of existing settlements and the urbanization of previously under- exploited regions. I analyze the complexities of this phenomenon across four frameworks: shifting settlement patterns, the regional and royal economy, civic religion, and the articulation of a new order in architectural and urban space. The introduction poses the central problem of the interrelationship between urbanization and imperial control and sets out the methodology of my dissertation. After briefly reviewing and critiquing previous approaches to this topic, which have focused mainly on creating catalogues, I point to the gains that can be made by shifting the focus to social and economic structures and asking more specific interpretive questions.
  • APOLLO in ASIA MINOR and in the APOCALYPSE Abstract

    APOLLO in ASIA MINOR and in the APOCALYPSE Abstract

    Title: CHAOS AND CLAIRVOYANCE: APOLLO IN ASIA MINOR AND IN THE APOCALYPSE Abstract: In the Apocalypse interpreters acknowledge several overt references to Apollo. Although one or two Apollo references have received consistent attention, no one has provided a sustained consideration of the references as a whole and why they are there. In fact, Apollo is more present across the Apocalypse than has been recognized. Typically, interpreters regard these overt instances as slights against the emperor. However, this view does not properly consider the Jewish/Christian perception of pagan gods as actual demons, Apollo’s role and prominence in the religion of Asia Minor, or the complexity of Apollo’s role in imperial propaganda and its influence where Greek religion was well-established. Using Critical Spatiality and Social Memory Theory, this study provides a more comprehensive religious interpretation of the presence of Apollo in the Apocalypse. I conclude that John progressively inverts popular religious and imperial conceptions of Apollo, portraying him as an agent of chaos and the Dragon. John strips Apollo of his positive associations, while assigning those to Christ. Additionally, John’s depiction of the god contributes to the invective against the Dragon and thus plays an important role to shape the social identity of the Christian audience away from the Dragon, the empire, and pagan religion and rather toward the one true God and the Lamb who conquers all. ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CHAOS AND CLAIRVOYANCE: APOLLO IN ASIA MINOR AND IN THE APOCALYPSE SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BIBLICAL STUDIES BY ANDREW J.
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion

    Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion

    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 8 | 1995 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion Angelos Chaniotis and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/605 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.605 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 1995 Number of pages: 205-266 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion », Kernos [Online], 8 | 1995, Online since 11 April 2011, connection on 16 September 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/kernos/605 Kernos Kernos, 8 (1995), p, 205-266. EpigrapWc Bulletin for Greek Religion 1991 (EBGR) This fifth issue of BEGR presents the publications of 1991 along with several addenda to BEGR 1987-1990. The division of the work between New York and Heidelberg, for the first time this year, caused certain logistical prablems, which can be seen in several gaps; some publications of 1991 could not be considered for this issue and will be included in the next BEGR, together with the publications of 1992. We are optimistic that in the future we will be able to accelerate the presentation of epigraphic publications. The principles explained in Kernos, 4 (991), p. 287-288 and Kernos, 7 (994), p. 287 apply also to this issue, The abbreviations used are those of L'Année Philologique and the Supplementum Bpigraphicum Graecum. We remind our readers that the bulletin is not a general bibliography on Greek religion; works devoted exclusively to religious matters (marked here with an asterisk) are presented very briefly, even if they make extensive use of inscriptions, In exceptional cases (see n° 87) we include in our bulletin studies on the Linear B tablets.
  • Université De Montréal the Cult of Apollo in the Milesian Colonies

    Université De Montréal the Cult of Apollo in the Milesian Colonies

    Université de Montréal The cult of Apollo in the Milesian colonies along the coast of the Black Sea: an inventory of archaeological data Par Patrick Bisaillon Département d’études classiques Faculté des arts et des sciences Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des études supérieures en vue de l’obtention du grade de M.A. en études classiques option Archéologie classique Mars 2017 © Patrick Bisaillon, 2017 ii iii Abstract Greek colonisation in the Archaic period had as its goal the expansion and the exportation of a city state’s social and religious customs into different regions. Although the subject of Greek colonisation is often vague, and based on erroneous, and generous primary sources, which can confound links between the colonies and their apparent mother city, a connection can nevertheless be established between the colonies in the Black Sea and the mother city of Miletus through the religious institutions that were installed upon colonisation. The cult of the god Apollo was prevalent throughout the ancient Greek world during the Archaic, Classical and Hellenistic periods. For the Archaic period colonizing Greek city state of Miletus, Apollo was patron deity, the god of colonisation, as well as the god of seafaring. For the Milesians, Apollo was the deity who sanctioned the right to set up new cults in new locations, as well as authorising the very act of establishing colonies. In the colonies founded by Miletus located along the coast of the Black Sea, there is a clear disposition towards the cult of Apollo in the literary tradition, as well as in the archaeological record.
  • THE DEATH of HERACLES Ev Cochrane

    THE DEATH of HERACLES Ev Cochrane

    THE DEATH OF HERACLES Ev Cochrane Sophocles' Trachiniae is conventionally dated to 440-430 BCE, and as such it represents the oldest extant tragedy dealing with the cycle of Heracles.1 The play also forms the most complete account of the events leading up to the hero's death, and thus must figure prominently in any discussion of the hero's mythus. Opinions of the play vary enormously. It has been called "one of the boldest and most powerful creations of Greek dramatic poetry."2 Other critics, however, have not been so kind. Sorum called it "a troublesome play."3 Its standard epithets, according to Segal, include "inferior, imperfect, very poor and insipid, gloomy, dark, puzzling, odd, nebulous, curious, bitter, difficult."4 The play takes its name from its setting, Trachis, a city in the Malian plain, close to the border of Aetolia and Thessaly, to whence the family of Heracles had been exiled because of his treacherous murder of Iphitus.5 The entire region was distinguished by its rich supply of hot springs, and it was this circumstance—coupled with its proximity to Mt. Oeta—which inspired Sophocles to choose Trachis for the setting of the play, Heracles being the patron god of hot springs.6 The plot of Trachiniae is simple enough. As the play opens Deianeira, the ever- faithful wife, awaits with her children for Heracles to return from his forced servitude at the hands of the Lydian queen Omphale. Rumors abound that Heracles has fallen madly in love with one Iole, whom he kidnapped upon sacking the kingdom of her father Eurytus.
  • Apollo and His Cult in the Geometric and Archaic Periods

    Apollo and His Cult in the Geometric and Archaic Periods

    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of Archaeology and Museology Classical Archaeology Barbora Chabrečková Apollo and His Cult in the Geometric and Archaic Periods Bachelor's Diploma Thesis Supervisor: PhDr. Marie Pardyová, CSc. 2014 I hereby declare that this thesis is my own work, created with use of primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. …………………………… Author’s signature 2 Acknowledgement I would like to thank my supervisor PhDr. Marie Pardyová, CSc., for guidance, constructive criticism and all the valuable advice. And thank my mother, for endless support, encouragement, and patience. 3 Table of contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Origin of the deity ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Doric origin based on etymology of the name ........................................................................ 7 2.2 Mythological birth at Delos and its later significance ............................................................. 8 2.3 Hypothesis on Asian origin ................................................................................................... 10 2.3.1 Based on epithet Lykeios ............................................................................................... 10 2.3.2 Based on Hittite and Luwian sources ...........................................................................
  • Forgetting Delphi Between Apollo and Dionysus Author(S): Marcel Detienne Source: Classical Philology, Vol

    Forgetting Delphi Between Apollo and Dionysus Author(S): Marcel Detienne Source: Classical Philology, Vol

    Forgetting Delphi between Apollo and Dionysus Author(s): Marcel Detienne Source: Classical Philology, Vol. 96, No. 2 (Apr., 2001), pp. 147-158 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1215486 . Accessed: 03/08/2011 11:47 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Classical Philology. http://www.jstor.org ESSAY FORGETTINGDELPHI BETWEEN APOLLO AND DIONYSUS MARCEL DETIENNE L ET US BE CLEAR who is at fault if we are still today attracted and fascinated by the opposition between Apollonian and Dionysiac, be it in a Poussin painting or at the origins of Greek religion.
  • Archeological Library

    Archeological Library

    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA ARCHEOLOGICAL LIBRARY ACCESSION NO. _|t765 -- CALL No.. _£ia.3qy//as Cambritigf i^irfjatologiral ant 0tf)nolog«al CYZICUS CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS RonOon: FETTER LANE, EC C F. CLAY, Manager Ctiniiurgb: loo, PRINCES STREET »nUn; A. ASHER & CO. Ibdp^ts: F. A. BROCKHAUS ^tlLSorft; G. P. ?VTNAJ!l’S SONS Bombig atvsCilnitts: MACMILLAN & CO., Ltd. Alt n^ti rtserveA CYZICUS BEING SOME ACCOUNT OF THE HISTORY AND ANTIQUITIES OF THAT CITY, AND OF THE DISTRICT ADJACENT TO IT, WITH THE TOWNS OF APOLLONIA AD RHTNDACUM, MILBrUPOUS, HADRIANUTHERAE, PRIAPUS, ZELEIA, BTC. cnN*> F. W. HASLUCK FELLOW OF king’s COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE Cmbri&ge: PRINTSD BY JOHN CLAY, M.A. AT.THEUNIVEBSITV PRESS -r; ,<r. fVrrrj r.-'LCCICAL j r- . U DKLHI. Arr. No HV^5.. Dttfe . 1^' \i • 6 2_. Call No....f?.>'5)- 2>‘^2../ VIRO ERVDITISSIMO CARISSIMO GVLIELMO RIDGEWAY AVCTOR (IRATISSIMVS AMANTISSIMVS EN HEBETI ANGVSTVM SVLCAVI VOMERE CAMPVM RITE EST TRIFTOLEMO RARA VOVENDA SEGES. PREFACE ' I "HIS book lays little claim to be considered as more than a -i- compilation, checked where possible by original research. It is an attempt to bring together the very various authorities on the district of Asia Minor with which it deals, and to digest the mass of available information into a convenient form. The district, crossed and re-crossed by numerous travellers, is com¬ paratively well known, and consequently affords greater oppor¬ tunity than most parts of Asia Minor for a treatise which may serve as a more or less permanent basis for future workers.
  • The 92Nd Annual Meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America Source: American Journal of Archaeology, Vol

    The 92Nd Annual Meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America Source: American Journal of Archaeology, Vol

    The 92nd Annual Meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America Source: American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 95, No. 2 (Apr., 1991), pp. 285-339 Published by: Archaeological Institute of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/505727 Accessed: 30-05-2015 14:01 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Archaeological Institute of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Journal of Archaeology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 134.153.184.170 on Sat, 30 May 2015 14:01:56 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The 92nd Annual Meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America The 92nd Annual Meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America was held in conjunction with the 122nd Annual Meeting of the American Philological Association in San Francisco, California, on 27-30 December 1990. On 28 December Martha Sharp Joukowsky, President of the Archaeological Institute of America, presented the Institute's 26th annual Gold Medal for Distinguished Archaeological Achievement to John W. Hayes. George F. Bass, Vice-President of the Institute, presented the 1 1th annual Pomerance Award of the Archaeological Institute of America for Scientific Contributions to Archaeology to Robert H.