DOCSLIB.ORG

Boismier Et Al MOLA Text.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boismier Et Al MOLA Text.Indd Excavations at Stanground South, Peterborough Prehistoric, Roman and post-medieval settlement along the margins of the fens William A Boismier, Edmund Taylor and Yvonne Wolframm-Murray With contributions by Theodora Anastasidou, Philip Armitage, Rob Atkins, Michael Bamforth, C.R.Batchelor, Anwen Caffell, Rebecca Casa-Hatton, Dana Challinor, Andy Chapman, Pat Chapman, Steve Critchley, Karen Deighton, Val Fryer, Malin Holst, Tora Hylton, Helen Keeley, Don Mackreth, ER McSloy, Ian Meadows and Maisie Taylor Illustrations by Olly Dindol and James Ladocha (plans and sections); Carla Ardis, David Haynes and Ed McSloy (artefacts) Archaeopress Archaeology Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978-1-78969-844-2 ISBN 978-1-78969-845-9 (e-Pdf) © MOLA Northampton and Archaeopress 2021 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents List of Figures ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ xii List of Tables ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xiv Contributors ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ xvi Acknowledgements ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xvii Photo credits .......................................................................................................................................................................xvii Summary ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xviii Chapter 1 Introduction ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 Location, topography and geology .....................................................................................................................................1 by WA Boismier, Steve Critchley and Helen Keeley Planning background .............................................................................................................................................................2 by WA Boismier and Rebecca Casa-Hatton Investigation Strategies .........................................................................................................................................................4 by WA Boismier, Ed Taylor and Yvonne Wolframm Murray Desk-based assessment ....................................................................................................................................................4 Field Evaluation ................................................................................................................................................................4 Stage 1: Geophysical survey ......................................................................................................................................4 Stage 2: Field artefact collection ..............................................................................................................................4 Stage 3: Trial trenching .............................................................................................................................................7 Mitigation Works ..............................................................................................................................................................7 Open area excavation .................................................................................................................................................7 Site 1: Western ditches and enclosures ...................................................................................................................7 Site 2: Iron Age and Roman settlement area ........................................................................................................12 Site 3: Droveway, settlement remains and urnfield area ....................................................................................13 Site 4: Ring ditch �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������14 Site 5: Location of human remains ........................................................................................................................14 Strip, map and record (SMR) excavation ...................................................................................................................15 East SMR .....................................................................................................................................................................15 West SMR ...................................................................................................................................................................15 Bypass East ................................................................................................................................................................16 Bypass West ...............................................................................................................................................................17 Balancing Ponds (BP1-BP5) .....................................................................................................................................17 East and West Internal Roads .................................................................................................................................18 Watching brief and other works ..................................................................................................................................18 Balancing Ponds South of Bypass East ..................................................................................................................18 Contractor’s Compound ..........................................................................................................................................18 Earthwork survey .....................................................................................................................................................18 Archive Location ...................................................................................................................................................................18 by Theodora Anastasidou and Tora Hylton Site phasing ...........................................................................................................................................................................18 by WA Boismier Chapter 2 The archaeological evidence ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������19 Period 1: Early prehistoric activity (Mesolithic to early Bronze Age) .........................................................................19 by Yvonne Wolframm-Murray Period 2: Bronze and early Iron Age ..................................................................................................................... 19 by WA Boismier, Ed Taylor and Yvonne Wolframm-Murray Overview ..........................................................................................................................................................................19 Early Bronze Age: the burnt mounds .........................................................................................................................19 by WA Boismier Features beneath burnt mound 1...........................................................................................................................20 Burnt mound BM1 ...................................................................................................................................................23 Burnt Mound BM2 ....................................................................................................................................................23 i Features pre-dating burnt mound 3 ......................................................................................................................27 Cremation cemetery ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������29 Burnt mound BM3 ....................................................................................................................................................34 Adjacent outside burnt mound 3 ...........................................................................................................................34 Features below burnt mound 4 ..............................................................................................................................34 Burnt mound BM4 ....................................................................................................................................................36
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Burnt Mounds, Unenclosed Platform Settlements and Information on Burnt Stone Activity in the River Clyde and Tweed Valleys of South Lanarkshire and Peeblesshire
    Burnt Mounds, Unenclosed Platform Settlements and information on burnt stone activity in the River Clyde and Tweed valleys of South Lanarkshire and Peeblesshire. by Tam Ward 2013 Burnt Mounds, Unenclosed Platform Settlements and information on burnt stone activity in the River Clyde and Tweed valleys of South Lanarkshire and Peeblesshire. PAGE 1 Abstract Throughout the work of Biggar Archaeology Group’s (BAG) projects, burnt stone is shown to have played an important aspect of life in the past. Sometimes deliberately burnt as a method of transference of heat in the case of burnt mounds and where water was heated, and also in pits where dry cooking may have taken place, to co-incidentally being burnt in hearths and fireplaces during all periods from the Mesolithic to Post Medieval times. The recognition of burnt stone in the archaeology of the Southern Uplands of Scotland has been fundamental to interpretations by the Group in their voluntary work. The greatest manifestation of burnt stone appears in burnt mounds (BM), a relatively new class of site for the area of the Clyde and Tweed valleys, albeit now one of the most numerous. The subject of burnt stone in the general archaeology of BAG projects is also considered. Unenclosed Platform Settlements (UPS) are also a numerous site type in the area and perhaps are poorly understood in terms of their spatial distribution, chronology and function, as indeed are the BM. It is regarding these sites (BM & UPS) and their possible relationship with each other that this paper principally seeks to address. Burnt Mounds, Unenclosed Platform Settlements and information on burnt stone activity in the River Clyde and Tweed valleys of South Lanarkshire and Peeblesshire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 5 Print Reference: Pages 561-572 Article 43 2003 The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island Lawson L. Schroeder Philip L. Schroeder Bryan College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Schroeder, Lawson L. and Schroeder, Philip L. (2003) "The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 5 , Article 43. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol5/iss1/43 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ANCIENT STANDING STONES, VILLAGES AND TOMBS FOUND ON THE ORKNEY ISLANDS LAWSON L. SCHROEDER, D.D.S. PHILIP L. SCHROEDER 5889 MILLSTONE RUN BRYAN COLLEGE STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30087 P. O. BOX 7484 DAYTON, TN 37321-7000 KEYWORDS: Orkney Islands, ancient stone structures, Skara Brae, Maes Howe, broch, Ring of Brodgar, Standing Stones of Stenness, dispersion, Babel, famine, Ice Age ABSTRACT The Orkney Islands make up an archipelago north of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian Archaeology 2011
    NatioNal academy of ScieNceS of UkraiNe iNStitUte of archaeology Selected PaPerS from UkraiNiaN JoUrNal arkheologiia UKRAINIAN ARCHAEOLOGY 2011 coNteNtS 3 DIAchenko o.V. central place theory in Archaeology. Determination of the relative Dates and settlements size 10 STUPAk D.V. explorations of epigravettian sites in the south of the middle Desna Area 26 BurDo n.B. Anthropomorphic figurines from the trypillian settlement of maydanetske 38 BunyAtyAn k.p., poZIkhoVskyI o.l. A settlement of the horodotsko-Zdovbytska culture near ostroh 57 KOTENKO V.V. grey-ware pottery from the maslyny settlement 65 GOPKAlo o.V. male and female Dress Accessories in the chernyakhiv culture 81 GERSHKOVych ya.p. korkut’s heritage in the cuman milieu of the north pontic region 91 The list of articles and summaries in the «archaeology» Journal 116 Our authors 117 abbreviations © InstItute of ArchAeology of nAs of ukrAIne, 2011 o.V. diachenko ceNtral Place theory iN archaeology. determiNatioN of the relatiVe dateS aNd SettlemeNtS SiZe Application of M. Beckmann’s model of the distribution of population within the settlements hierarchy makes possible to define the number and size of settlements that are out of samples. A special application of the Central Place Theory may be useful to establish the relative dates of the known settlements and to determine their approximate size. Keywords: central place theory, relative chronology, spatial analysis, settlement system. the central place theory (cpt) originally pro- 3. All parts of the surface must be serviced by posed by w. christaller is a well-known spatial mod- central places; the complementary regions must el in geographical and archaeological studies that occupy the entire examined territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Buckinghamshire: a Resource Assessment
    Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Buckinghamshire: a resource assessment Inheritance Mobility Although Neolithic populations are thought to have had continued mobility, more and more evidence for Neolithic settlement has come to light. In Buckinghamshire the most important evidence comes from excavations in advance of the construction of Eton Rowing Course (ERC) and the Maidenhead to Windsor and Eton Flood Alleviation Scheme (MWEFAS), mainly in the parish of Dorney in South Bucks on the Thames. The evidence points to intensive use of the area by people in the Early Neolithic but it is not certain that it represents year-round sedentary occupation rather than seasonal re-use (Allen et al 2004). Other evidence does point to continued mobility, such as the artefact scatters at Scotsgrove Mill, Haddenham (Mitchell 2004) and East Street, Chesham (Collard 1990) for example, reflecting visits over a long period of time. Persistent places Mesolithic persistent places continue to have meaning for Early and later Neolithic populations. These persistent places include East Street, Chesham (Collard 1990, 18) and Late Neolithic to Early Bronze Age activity at Chessvale Bowling Club nearby (Halsted 2006, 23-8). Another persistent place seems to have been the lower reaches of the River Colne. Recent excavations at the Sanderson Site, Denham (Halsey 2005) continued the activity from nearby Three Ways Wharf, Uxbridge (Lewis 1991). Other persistent places include the attractive river valley location at Bancroft in Milton Keynes (Williams 1993, 5), and Scotsgrove Mill, Haddenham, where the River Thame meets one of its tributaries (Mitchell 2004, 1). These persistent places may have been the basis of evolving ideas about land tenure.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Excavation Findings Brighton Road, Foxrock, Dublin 1 8
    Final Excavation Findings Brighton Road, Foxrock, Dublin 1 8 GIACOMETTI 03/04/201 8 1 5E087 DLRCC D1 3A/0285 & D1 5A/0501 archaeology plan H E R I T A G E S O L U T I O N S SITE NAME Lands off Brighton Road, Foxrock, Dublin 1 8 CLIENT Castlethorn Constuction, Usher House, Main Street, Dundrum, Dublin 1 4 PLANNING PL06D.2431 93. DLRCC D1 3A/0285& D1 5A/0501 LICENCE Excavation 1 5E087 REPORT AUTHORS Antoine Giacometti MA MIAI DATE 3rd April 201 8 EXCAVATION STAFF Director Antoine Giacometti Project Officer Steve McGlade Project Officer Paula Kehoe Project Supervisor David Stone Project Archaeologists Liza Kavanagh Killian Foley John Kerrigan James Kyle Aiden Holmes Project Historian Gill Boazman ARCHAEOLOGICAL PLANNING CONSULTANCY ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTS CULTURAL HERITAGE STATEMENTS archaeology plan 32 fitzwilliam place dublin 2 tel 01 6761 373 mob 087 2497733 [email protected] www.archaeologyplan.com Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 Report summary Site location Development and planning Methodology 2 Final Excavation Findings 3 Prehistoric wells and fulachtaí fia Early medieval structure 3 References 25 Appendices in companion volume 1 Background, by Gillian Boazman 2 Stratigraphic Report, by David Stone and Antoine Giacometti 3 Brighton Road pottery, by Rose Cleary 4 Brighton Road glass bead, by Mags Mannion 5 Lithic finds report, by Sean Sharpe 6 Coarse Stone Tool Report, by Niamh Kelly 7 Waterlogged plant remains, by Penny Johnston 7 Report On Faunal Material, by Fiona Beglane 8 Charcoal and Wood Report, by Ellen O’ Carroll 9 Radiocarbon dating, by C1 4 Chrono Lab, Queen’ s University 1 0 Archive register 1 1 Context register 1 2 Drawing register 1 3 Photographic register 1 4 Finds register 1 5 Sample register Section 1 Introduction Report Summary Site location A fascinating multi-period site was excavated at The archaeological site was located on 5.2 hec- Brighton Road in Foxrock, Dublin 18.
    [Show full text]
  • A Ritualistic Interpretation of Bronze Age Burnt Mounds from an Ethnographic Perspective
    The Post Hole Issue 26 Something for everyone: a ritualistic interpretation of Bronze Age burnt mounds from an ethnographic perspective Alex Loktionov1 1Division of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DZ Email: [email protected] Burnt mounds are among the most enigmatic archaeological features found across the British Isles. This paper provides an overview of current theories regarding their use, drawing on ethnographic comparisons with societies of varying complexity in North America, the Urals and the Teotihuacán cultural complex. A new approach to research and interpretation in this field is illustrated through a case study of a Bronze Age section of Barningham Moor, Teesdale, Yorkshire, UK, in which a burnt mound is analysed in the context of monuments and landscape features surrounding it. This example is used to support the view that burnt mounds were inherently multi-functional, and had ritual meaning symbolising connections with nature and the spirit world that were in no way less significant than their practical use. Introduction Burnt mounds, also known as Fulacht Fiadh in Ireland, are widely distributed throughout the British Isles. They consist of two low ridges rarely exceeding 1m in height, and separated by a distinctive trough. The overall diameter of the main feature rarely exceeds 9m, with trough volume typically near 1m2 (Barfield and Hodder 1987, 371). Frequently the ridges are so inconspicuous that the entire monument can only be identified by vegetation growing over the underlying rock, which may differ substantially from the surrounding plant cover (Laurie 2003, 244). On excavation, such sites reveal numerous pieces of heat- cracked sandstone within the ridges, with the lithology indicative of repeated contact with water (Quinn and Moore 2007, 8).
    [Show full text]
  • A Middle Bronze Age Burnt Mound at Greywell Road, Hatch, Basingstoke
    Proc. Hampshire Field Club Archaenl. Soc. 61, 2006, 1-15 (Hampshire Studies 2006) A MIDDLE BRONZE AGE BURNT MOUND AT GREYWELL ROAD, HATCH, BASINGSTOKE By RICHARD ORAM with contributions by LUCY CRAMP, STEVE FORD and FRANCES RAYMOND ABSTRACT was traced at Chineham not far to the north (Moore 2001). Neiu development on a site believed to be on the line Archaeological investigation was carried of a Roman road xuas preceded by a desk-based assess- out by Thames Valley Archaeological Sendees ment and an evaluation. The evaluation did not. Ltd, 24 Jan- 14 Feb 2005. Planning consent convincingly locale the road, but did reveal a deposit had been granted by Basingstoke and Dean of burnt flint that appeared to be a prehistoric burnt Borough Council to develop the site for housing mound. A small excavation tested, the nature of this and commercial use, subject to a condition deposit and determined its context. Although a Roman requiring archaeological work in accordance ditch crossed the site on the projected line of the road, with the Department of the Environment's there xuas no sign, of the road itself Pottery, flint-work Planning Policy Guidance, Archaeology and and radiocarbon dating converged to confirm that Planning (PPG16 1990), and the Borough's the flint iuas the remains of a mound created in the policies on archaeology. A desk-based assess- middle Bronze Age. ment was followed by field evaluation, designed to include trenches intersecting the projected course of the Roman road, but no convincing INTRODUCTION trace of it was discovered. Instead, a spread of burnt flint was revealed, together with Bronze The site (SU 67830 52085) is located on the Age and Roman pottery and prehistoric struck south side of Greywell Road, to the east of the flints.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bronze-Age Burnt Mound at Sandy Lane, Charlton Kings, Gloucestershire: Excavations in 1971 by M
    From the Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society A Bronze-Age Burnt Mound at Sandy Lane, Charlton Kings, Gloucestershire: excavations in 1971 by M. Leah and C. Young 2001, Vol. 119, 59-82 © The Society and the Author(s) Trans. Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society 119 (2001), 59–82 A Bronze-Age Burnt Mound at Sandy Lane, Charlton Kings, Gloucestershire: excavations in 1971 By MARK LEAH AND CHRISTOPHER YOUNG With contributions by Richard Bradley, Sue Bridgford, Emma Harrison, Mark Maltby and Jane Timby Introduction In 1951 a small-scale excavation was undertaken at Sandy Lane in Charlton Kings, near Chelten- ham (at approximately O.S. Nat. Grid SO 95461982), by the staff and students of Oakley Train- ing College. The investigations produced a quantity of Iron-Age pottery, a few sherds of Neolithic and Romano-British material, some struck flint, and a quantity of animal bone, all of which were recovered from a layer of grey sand containing charcoal and overlying the natural sands. No evidence of pits, postholes and structural features was recovered (Purnell and Webb 1950: not published until March 1952; Saville 1984, 154). Over the next twenty years sand quarrying to the north and east and housing development to the south and west destroyed much of the surrounding area. Only c. 200 square metres (centred on SO 95461972: Fig. 1) immedi- ately to the south of the excavations were left untouched. In 1971 this area was excavated under the direction of Christopher Young. These latter excavations were funded by the Department of the Environment, although the site was omitted in error from Rescue Excavation 1938 to 1972 (Butcher and Garwood 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 16.3 Archaeological Excavation Report
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT KILCARBERY Appendix 16.3 Archaeological Excavation Report STEPHEN LITTLE & ASSOCIATES AUGUST 2019 Archaeological Excavation Report Kilcarbery Grange, Clondalkin, County Dublin Prepared by: Dermot Nelis and Colm Flynn for: South Dublin County Council Licence Number: 17E0367 Extension 10th December 2018 Kilcarbery Grange, County Dublin Archaeological Excavation Report CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 1.1 General 1.2 The Development 1.3 Project Background 1.4 Project Team 2 Baseline Environmental Study 4 2.1 Methodology 2.2 Paper and Digital Survey 2.3 Field Inspection 3 Archaeological and Historical Background 6 3.1 General 3.2 Summary of Previous Fieldwork in the General Development Area 3.3 Cartographic Analysis 3.4 Aerial Photographs 3.5 County Development Plan 3.6 Toponyms 3.7 Topographical Files of the National Museum of Ireland 3.8 Summary 4 Excavation Results 30 5 Non-Technical Summary 48 References Appendix 1: List of Contexts Appendix 2: Environmental Analysis Report Appendix 3: Animal Bone Report Appendix 4: Radiocarbon Dating Dermot Nelis Archaeology Kilcarbery Grange, County Dublin Archaeological Excavation Report List of Figures Figure 1 Site location Figure 2 Site layout Figure 3 Aerial photograph, showing the development area Figure 4 RMP sites within the 1km study area Figure 5 Extract from First Edition 1:10,560 Ordnance Survey Map (1844), showing the development area Figure 6 Extract from First Edition 1:2,500 Ordnance Survey Map (1863), showing the development area
    [Show full text]
  • Late Bronze Age & Iron Age Berkshire
    SOLENT THAMES RESEARCH FRAMEWORK LATER BRONZE AGE AND IRON AGE BERKSHIRE Steve Ford October 2007 Inheritance The subdivision of prehistory into periods has long been recognised as a mechanism for description of what is essentially a continuum of development. Yet some of the subdivisions are of much more significance than others, for example the introduction of agriculture. For the period under consideration here it is not therefore that the widespread adoption of iron which is necessary significant but perhaps the transition from ‘monument dominated landscapes and mobile settlement patterns to that of more permanent settlement and a greater emphasis on agricultural production' (English Heritage 1991, 36). It was considered that the onset of the Middle Bronze Age defined this in cultural terms and, more importantly in physical evidence terms (Ellison 1981). Whatever the merits of this concept for other regions, or in terms of absolute chronology, or in terms of conservatism in material culture and way of life, the study area has now provided data with which to reconsider this concept. It is considered that the transition described above is most evident from the late Bronze Age rather than the middle Bronze Age within the study area. Chronology The chronology of the period is not especially well documented in terms of radiocarbon dates, when considered against the relative wealth of excavated deposits in the later Bronze Age. Some of this is partly a response by earlier excavators to the nature of the radiocarbon calibration curve which is relatively flat for the Late Bronze Age and what would be considered squandering of valuable resources for a period relatively well supplied by pottery chronology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heart of Neolithic Orkney World Heritage Site: Research Agenda
    The Heart of Neolithic Orkney World Heritage Site Research Agenda The Heart of Neolithic Orkney World Heritage Site Research Agenda Edited by Jane Downes, Sally M Foster and C R Wickham-Jones with Jude Callister Historic Scotland 2005 Published by Historic Scotland ISBN 1 904966 04 7 © Individual authors Edinburgh 2005 Project grant-aided by Historic Scotland, Orkney Islands Council and Orkney Heritage Society, with support from Orkney College UHI As advisers to the World Heritage Committee, ICOMOS has drawn up guidelines for the management of World Heritage Sites and for research programmes to promote and co-ordinate research in the area. In Orkney this important task has been carried out with the contribution of a number of partners. It has been a collaborative venture involving many experts who have generously given freely of their time. I know that Historic Scotland has been delighted to support the Orkney College UHI in organising and co-ordinating the production of this Research Agenda for Scotland’s first archaeological World Heritage Site, The Heart of Neolithic Orkney. We very much hope that this Research Agenda will prove a model for Site managers throughout the world, as well as others dealing with the challenges and opportunities of their local archaeological inheritance elsewhere in Scotland. Patricia Ferguson Minister for Tourism, Culture and Sport 5 Dedicated to Daphne Home Lorimer, prime mover in the setting up of Orkney Archaeological Trust and Chairman of the Trust 1996-2004 6 Contents 13 Foreword 15 List of contributors
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Prehistoric Burnt Mounds in Ireland
    The Archaeology of Prehistoric Burnt Mounds in Ireland Alan Hawkes Archaeopress Archaeology Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78491 986 3 ISBN 978 1 78491 987 0 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and Alan Hawkes 2018 Cover: Nick Hogan Front cover: Burnt mound (SMR: CO102-005013) in the townland of Ardgroom Outward, Co. Cork (Photo: Nick Hogan) Back cover: Top – bottom: Drombeg stone-lined trough (Photo: Edward Fahy, courtesy of Dan Breen); reconstructed cooking trough and burnt stone mound (Photo: author); excavation of a trough at Bockagh, Co. Roscommon (Photo: IAC Ltd); heat-shattered/affected stone (Photo: author) All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents List of figures �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������iii Acknowledgments ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� vi Preface �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� vii CHAPTER
    [Show full text]