Reservoirs, and Implications for Future Reservoir Works and Site Monitoring

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reservoirs, and Implications for Future Reservoir Works and Site Monitoring This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Policy, Application and Effect of Legislation Concerning Archaeological Sites in Reservoirs, and Implications for Future Reservoir Works and Site Monitoring Submitted by Emily J. Stammitti In partial requirement of the Doctor of Philosophy in Archaeology University of Edinburgh 2014 Abstract The number of dams and reservoirs in the world is at an all- time high, with global increases expected as water shortages, populations and needs for electricity grow. Despite this high number of existent and planned reservoirs, the archaeological sites submerged in reservoirs have been largely ignored saving predevelopment, project-specific archaeological salvage campaigns. The overlooking of submerged archaeological features derives from ideas that sites in reservoirs are destroyed: a notion that continues to permeate discussions surrounding archaeological features in reservoir flood zones. Heritage legislation, at both the domestic and international level, continues to neglect the pressing issue of monitoring the condition of submerged archaeology. This dissertation analyses the domestic heritage legislation of three specific countries (Britain, the USA and Egypt) and heritage legislation at the international level. Effects of submergence on diverse archaeological features from those countries are also taken into account via the data collected from varying types of archaeological investigation: the desk-based assessment, underwater archaeological fieldwork, and non-intrusive terrestrial fieldwork. Analysis of current legal structures suggests that mechanisms with which to monitor sites and provide mitigating measures would be simple to implement and maintain. Data collected through underwater archaeological fieldwork in Britain and terrestrial archaeological fieldwork in the USA suggests that not all types of archaeological sites are at risk of destruction due to submergence, leading to a classification of vulnerable features, determined on the basis of location in the reservoir and construction materials and methods. Mitigating and monitoring measures of these vulnerable feature classifications can be used in future reservoir planning and archaeological conservation efforts, when combined with changes to regional and domestic heritage policy. Final conclusions focus on the need to classify archaeology in reservoirs as "submerged landscapes", an already recognized underwater archaeological category, thereby helping to grant the long-needed protection, awareness and monitoring these features need throughout their duration in situ. 2 Acknowledgments I would never have been able to finish my thesis without the continued help and support of so many people. There are so many that must remain nameless, but gratitude is due to the people and organizations I have worked with most closely. I am grateful to all of the faculty and staff, especially Jim Crow, Ian Ralston, Lindsay Scott and Amanda Campbell, in the School of History, Classics and Archaeology for their enduring support in times of crisis, guidance, and their uncanny ability to provide an answer for all occasions, and smile even when there was no occasion. Special thanks is directed at Scottish Water for their permission to dive in Scotland's drinking water; to Tam Ward of the Biggar Archaeology Group for providing guidance, and sharing his information; David Strachan of the Perth & Kinross Heritage Trust for sharing data about the Upper Glendevon Reservoir; and Pete Bicheno, for his help in organising fieldwork and his branch of BSAC's generous donation of an air compressor and boat. Thanks goes out to Dr. Max Ruffert, and Dougie McEwan and the staff at the Edinburgh Dive Centre for their assistance. Extra special thanks is due to all of the volunteers (and donors of equipment) who came to Scotland during a wet spring season to dive cold, Scottish waters. I am grateful to NG Archaeology Services for financial and on-site assistance, as well as to Dr. Mike Cressey at CFA Archaeology and my acquaintances at Historic Scotland and the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historic Monuments of Scotland for their support, advice and laughter. On a more personal level, I would like to acknowledge my friends and family for their questions, their willingness to answer the phone at all hours of the day and for their love of a hermit. A special thank you goes to my father for imbuing in me a sense of community, empathy and a love of the water, and my mother for teaching me the value of a strong constitution of character in the face of all of life's obstacles. Gratitude goes out to Nick for his continued support; Dr. David Staley whose encouragement has rung in my ears for over a decade; Dr. William Arrocha for his willingness to discuss heritage politics electronically; Jessie for teaching me the value of second chances; and to Adrian, who brought me to this stage in my life. 3 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND FOUNDATIONS ........................................................ 9 1.1 WHAT CONSTITUTES A SITE? ..................................................................................... 14 1.2 WHAT IS SUBMERGED ARCHAEOLOGY? .................................................................. 16 1.3 WHY ARE RESERVOIRS IMPORTANT STUDY AREAS? .......................................... 17 1.4 IMPORTANCE OF TOPIC IN CROSS-CULTURAL SETTING ................................... 20 1.5 LAYOUT OF DISSERTATION .......................................................................................... 22 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW .................................................................................. 26 2.1 UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGY OVERVIEW ............................................................ 27 2.2 SEABED DISTRIBUTION THEORY ............................................................................... 28 2.3 SCOTTISH UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGY .............................................................. 31 2.4 FRESHWATER ARCHAEOLOGY PERTAINING TO RESERVOIRS ......................... 33 2.5 THE US NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL RESERVOIR INUNDATION SURVEY (NRIS) .................................................................................................................. 35 2.6 WORLD COMMISSION ON DAMS REPORT (WCDR) ............................................... 40 2.7 CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT THEORY .................................................... 43 2.8 IN SITU PRESERVATION VS. EXCAVATION ............................................................. 54 2.9 GAPS IN LITERATURE, DOMINANT CONCEPTS, AND SUGGESTED CONTRIBUTION ................................................................................................................ 58 CLOSING THE LITERARY GAP ....................................................................................................................... 59 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................. 62 3.1 POLICY ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................ 62 3.2 PHOTOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................ 67 3.3 DESK BASED ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................... 70 3.4 WALKOVER SURVEY ...................................................................................................... 73 3.5 UNDERWATER FIELDWORK ....................................................................................... 74 3.6 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDING FORMS AND RESULTANT NUMBERS .......... 78 3.7 INTERVIEWS ..................................................................................................................... 81 3.8 SPECIFIC CASE STUDIES ................................................................................................ 82 CASE STUDY: PHILAE ..................................................................................................................................... 82 CASE STUDY: ST. THOMAS ............................................................................................................................ 83 CASE STUDY: SCOTLAND (6 RESERVOIRS) ................................................................................................ 85 3.9 METHODOLOGY RESULTS (HYPOTHESIS) .............................................................. 87 CHAPTER 4 DAMS: AN INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 89 4.1 SEDIMENTARY PROCESSES AFFECTING SITE STABILITY .................................. 91 4.2
Recommended publications
  • Scuba Diving History
    Scuba diving history Scuba history from a diving bell developed by Guglielmo de Loreno in 1535 up to John Bennett’s dive in the Philippines to amazing 308 meter in 2001 and much more… Humans have been diving since man was required to collect food from the sea. The need for air and protection under water was obvious. Let us find out how mankind conquered the sea in the quest to discover the beauty of the under water world. 1535 – A diving bell was developed by Guglielmo de Loreno. 1650 – Guericke developed the first air pump. 1667 – Robert Boyle observes the decompression sickness or “the bends”. After decompression of a snake he noticed gas bubbles in the eyes of a snake. 1691 – Another diving bell a weighted barrels, connected with an air pipe to the surface, was patented by Edmund Halley. 1715 – John Lethbridge built an underwater cylinder that was supplied via an air pipe from the surface with compressed air. To prevent the water from entering the cylinder, greased leather connections were integrated at the cylinder for the operators arms. 1776 – The first submarine was used for a military attack. 1826 – Charles Anthony and John Deane patented a helmet for fire fighters. This helmet was used for diving too. This first version was not fitted to the diving suit. The helmet was attached to the body of the diver with straps and air was supplied from the surfa 1837 – Augustus Siebe sealed the diving helmet of the Deane brothers’ to a watertight diving suit and became the standard for many dive expeditions.
    [Show full text]
  • South Lanarkshire Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Energy
    South Lanarkshire Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Energy Report by IronsideFarrar 7948 / February 2016 South Lanarkshire Council Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Energy __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS 3.3 Landscape Designations 11 3.3.1 National Designations 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page No 3.3.2 Local and Regional Designations 11 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 3.4 Other Designations 12 1.1 Background 1 3.4.1 Natural Heritage designations 12 1.2 National and Local Policy 2 3.4.2 Historic and cultural designations 12 1.3 The Capacity Study 2 3.4.3 Tourism and recreational interests 12 1.4 Landscape Capacity and Cumulative Impacts 2 4.0 VISUAL BASELINE 13 2.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACT AND CAPACITY METHODOLOGY 3 4.1 Visual Receptors 13 2.1 Purpose of Methodology 3 4.2 Visibility Analysis 15 2.2 Study Stages 3 4.2.1 Settlements 15 2.3 Scope of Assessment 4 4.2.2 Routes 15 2.3.1 Area Covered 4 4.2.3 Viewpoints 15 2.3.2 Wind Energy Development Types 4 4.2.4 Analysis of Visibility 15 2.3.3 Use of Geographical Information Systems 4 5.0 WIND TURBINES IN THE STUDY AREA 17 2.4 Landscape and Visual Baseline 4 5.1 Turbine Numbers and Distribution 17 2.5 Method for Determining Landscape Sensitivity and Capacity 4 5.1.1 Operating and Consented Wind Turbines 17 2.6 Defining Landscape Change and Cumulative Capacity 5 5.1.2 Proposed Windfarms and Turbines (at March 2015) 18 2.6.1 Cumulative Change
    [Show full text]
  • Burnt Mounds, Unenclosed Platform Settlements and Information on Burnt Stone Activity in the River Clyde and Tweed Valleys of South Lanarkshire and Peeblesshire
    Burnt Mounds, Unenclosed Platform Settlements and information on burnt stone activity in the River Clyde and Tweed valleys of South Lanarkshire and Peeblesshire. by Tam Ward 2013 Burnt Mounds, Unenclosed Platform Settlements and information on burnt stone activity in the River Clyde and Tweed valleys of South Lanarkshire and Peeblesshire. PAGE 1 Abstract Throughout the work of Biggar Archaeology Group’s (BAG) projects, burnt stone is shown to have played an important aspect of life in the past. Sometimes deliberately burnt as a method of transference of heat in the case of burnt mounds and where water was heated, and also in pits where dry cooking may have taken place, to co-incidentally being burnt in hearths and fireplaces during all periods from the Mesolithic to Post Medieval times. The recognition of burnt stone in the archaeology of the Southern Uplands of Scotland has been fundamental to interpretations by the Group in their voluntary work. The greatest manifestation of burnt stone appears in burnt mounds (BM), a relatively new class of site for the area of the Clyde and Tweed valleys, albeit now one of the most numerous. The subject of burnt stone in the general archaeology of BAG projects is also considered. Unenclosed Platform Settlements (UPS) are also a numerous site type in the area and perhaps are poorly understood in terms of their spatial distribution, chronology and function, as indeed are the BM. It is regarding these sites (BM & UPS) and their possible relationship with each other that this paper principally seeks to address. Burnt Mounds, Unenclosed Platform Settlements and information on burnt stone activity in the River Clyde and Tweed valleys of South Lanarkshire and Peeblesshire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 5 Print Reference: Pages 561-572 Article 43 2003 The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island Lawson L. Schroeder Philip L. Schroeder Bryan College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Schroeder, Lawson L. and Schroeder, Philip L. (2003) "The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 5 , Article 43. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol5/iss1/43 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ANCIENT STANDING STONES, VILLAGES AND TOMBS FOUND ON THE ORKNEY ISLANDS LAWSON L. SCHROEDER, D.D.S. PHILIP L. SCHROEDER 5889 MILLSTONE RUN BRYAN COLLEGE STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30087 P. O. BOX 7484 DAYTON, TN 37321-7000 KEYWORDS: Orkney Islands, ancient stone structures, Skara Brae, Maes Howe, broch, Ring of Brodgar, Standing Stones of Stenness, dispersion, Babel, famine, Ice Age ABSTRACT The Orkney Islands make up an archipelago north of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Sea Dive Ebook Free Download
    DEEP SEA DIVE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Frank Lampard | 112 pages | 07 Apr 2016 | Hachette Children's Group | 9780349132136 | English | London, United Kingdom Deep Sea Dive PDF Book Zombie Worm. Marrus orthocanna. Deep diving can mean something else in the commercial diving field. They can be found all over the world. Depth at which breathing compressed air exposes the diver to an oxygen partial pressure of 1. Retrieved 31 May Diving medicine. Arthur J. Retrieved 13 March Although commercial and military divers often operate at those depths, or even deeper, they are surface supplied. Minimal visibility is still possible far deeper. The temperature is rising in the ocean and we still don't know what kind of an impact that will have on the many species that exist in the ocean. Guiel Jr. His dive was aborted due to equipment failure. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. Depth limit for a group of 2 to 3 French Level 3 recreational divers, breathing air. Underwater diving to a depth beyond the norm accepted by the associated community. Limpet mine Speargun Hawaiian sling Polespear. Michele Geraci [42]. Diving safety. Retrieved 19 September All of these considerations result in the amount of breathing gas required for deep diving being much greater than for shallow open water diving. King Crab. Atrial septal defect Effects of drugs on fitness to dive Fitness to dive Psychological fitness to dive. The bottom part which has the pilot sphere inside. List of diving environments by type Altitude diving Benign water diving Confined water diving Deep diving Inland diving Inshore diving Muck diving Night diving Open-water diving Black-water diving Blue-water diving Penetration diving Cave diving Ice diving Wreck diving Recreational dive sites Underwater environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian Archaeology 2011
    NatioNal academy of ScieNceS of UkraiNe iNStitUte of archaeology Selected PaPerS from UkraiNiaN JoUrNal arkheologiia UKRAINIAN ARCHAEOLOGY 2011 coNteNtS 3 DIAchenko o.V. central place theory in Archaeology. Determination of the relative Dates and settlements size 10 STUPAk D.V. explorations of epigravettian sites in the south of the middle Desna Area 26 BurDo n.B. Anthropomorphic figurines from the trypillian settlement of maydanetske 38 BunyAtyAn k.p., poZIkhoVskyI o.l. A settlement of the horodotsko-Zdovbytska culture near ostroh 57 KOTENKO V.V. grey-ware pottery from the maslyny settlement 65 GOPKAlo o.V. male and female Dress Accessories in the chernyakhiv culture 81 GERSHKOVych ya.p. korkut’s heritage in the cuman milieu of the north pontic region 91 The list of articles and summaries in the «archaeology» Journal 116 Our authors 117 abbreviations © InstItute of ArchAeology of nAs of ukrAIne, 2011 o.V. diachenko ceNtral Place theory iN archaeology. determiNatioN of the relatiVe dateS aNd SettlemeNtS SiZe Application of M. Beckmann’s model of the distribution of population within the settlements hierarchy makes possible to define the number and size of settlements that are out of samples. A special application of the Central Place Theory may be useful to establish the relative dates of the known settlements and to determine their approximate size. Keywords: central place theory, relative chronology, spatial analysis, settlement system. the central place theory (cpt) originally pro- 3. All parts of the surface must be serviced by posed by w. christaller is a well-known spatial mod- central places; the complementary regions must el in geographical and archaeological studies that occupy the entire examined territory.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 AQUANAUT GUIDE SCUBA REGULATORS 67 Adjustability Environmental Seal There Are Two Primary Adjustments Available on Modern Regulators
    SWIM REGULATORS 65 Performance Many people believe performance is the major criteria in the choice of a regulator. Certainly, you should choose a regulator that is appropriate for the types of diving you intend to undertake. Most modern regulators will perform adequately under normal demand at moderate depths. The deeper you dive and the harder you breathe (for example, swimming against a current at depth) will result in a higher demand on your regulator. So if you were planning on diving in demanding conditions, it would pay to invest in a high-performance regulator. Generally though, when it comes to judging performance, it pays to remember that the greatest testament to a regulator is its performance under harsh environments. Australia’s Far North Queensland (FNQ) has the highest concentration of dive equipment usage in the world. Gear may be used three to four times a day, seven days a week. These professional operators recognise the need for the best equipment. They also understand that the materials used and the design are critical for their customer’s ultimate safety and comfort. Aqualung regulators have proved to be the most popular choice in FNQ and resorts around the world. Unlike Aqua Lung, very few companies make their own regulators. Most equipment suppliers outsource products or simply re-badge or assemble components from existing manufacturers. This makes quality control very difficult and encourages Scuba regulators are designed to reduce the high-pressure air from the scuba cylinder obsolescence. Suppliers will move from one manufacturer to another as either the to a level where the diver can breathe comfortably and safely.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Buckinghamshire: a Resource Assessment
    Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Buckinghamshire: a resource assessment Inheritance Mobility Although Neolithic populations are thought to have had continued mobility, more and more evidence for Neolithic settlement has come to light. In Buckinghamshire the most important evidence comes from excavations in advance of the construction of Eton Rowing Course (ERC) and the Maidenhead to Windsor and Eton Flood Alleviation Scheme (MWEFAS), mainly in the parish of Dorney in South Bucks on the Thames. The evidence points to intensive use of the area by people in the Early Neolithic but it is not certain that it represents year-round sedentary occupation rather than seasonal re-use (Allen et al 2004). Other evidence does point to continued mobility, such as the artefact scatters at Scotsgrove Mill, Haddenham (Mitchell 2004) and East Street, Chesham (Collard 1990) for example, reflecting visits over a long period of time. Persistent places Mesolithic persistent places continue to have meaning for Early and later Neolithic populations. These persistent places include East Street, Chesham (Collard 1990, 18) and Late Neolithic to Early Bronze Age activity at Chessvale Bowling Club nearby (Halsted 2006, 23-8). Another persistent place seems to have been the lower reaches of the River Colne. Recent excavations at the Sanderson Site, Denham (Halsey 2005) continued the activity from nearby Three Ways Wharf, Uxbridge (Lewis 1991). Other persistent places include the attractive river valley location at Bancroft in Milton Keynes (Williams 1993, 5), and Scotsgrove Mill, Haddenham, where the River Thame meets one of its tributaries (Mitchell 2004, 1). These persistent places may have been the basis of evolving ideas about land tenure.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Borders Council Tweeddale Area Forum
    SCOTTISH BORDERS COUNCIL TWEEDDALE AREA FORUM MINUTE of the MEETING of the TWEEDDALE AREA FORUM held in the Council Chamber, Rosetta Road, Peebles on 2 March 2016 at 6.30 p.m. ------------------ Present:- Councillors W. Archibald (Chairman), S. Bell K. Cockburn, G. Garvie, G. Logan. Community Councillors R. Howard, G. Hughes, C. Lewin, G. Parker, R. Tatler, J. Taylor, G. Tulloch. Apology:- Councillor C. Bhatia. In Attendance:- Infrastructure Manager (C. Ovens) for para 4, Flood and Coastal Management Team Leader (D. Morrison) for para 4, Strategic Community Engagement Officer (C. Malster) for para 8, Team Leader Road Safety and Traffic Management (J. McQuillin) for para 9, Inspector Mike Bennett (Police Scotland) for para 12, Keith Langley (Fire and Rescue Service) for para 5, Democratic Services Officer (K. Mason). Members of the Public:- Approximately 50. --------------------------------------- 1. ORDER OF BUSINESS The Chairman varied the order of business as shown on the agenda and the Minute reflects the order in which the items were considered at the meeting. 2. EASTGATE THEATRE AND ARTS CENTRE, PEEBLES The Chairman invited Captain Sir David Younger KCVO to present information on the Eastgate Theatre and Arts Centre, Peebles. Sir David explained that Education Scotland in partnership with Creative Scotland undertook three reviews of Creative Place Award winners in late 2015. In Peebles, HM Inspectors found that the Creative Place Award was a catalyst for extending the arts and culture and that the Eastgate Theatre provided strong and effective leadership as a creative hub for the Community. He advised this was a remarkable achievement for a relatively small community and took the opportunity to thank Scottish Borders Council for the arts grants made to the Theatre over the last 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Excavation Findings Brighton Road, Foxrock, Dublin 1 8
    Final Excavation Findings Brighton Road, Foxrock, Dublin 1 8 GIACOMETTI 03/04/201 8 1 5E087 DLRCC D1 3A/0285 & D1 5A/0501 archaeology plan H E R I T A G E S O L U T I O N S SITE NAME Lands off Brighton Road, Foxrock, Dublin 1 8 CLIENT Castlethorn Constuction, Usher House, Main Street, Dundrum, Dublin 1 4 PLANNING PL06D.2431 93. DLRCC D1 3A/0285& D1 5A/0501 LICENCE Excavation 1 5E087 REPORT AUTHORS Antoine Giacometti MA MIAI DATE 3rd April 201 8 EXCAVATION STAFF Director Antoine Giacometti Project Officer Steve McGlade Project Officer Paula Kehoe Project Supervisor David Stone Project Archaeologists Liza Kavanagh Killian Foley John Kerrigan James Kyle Aiden Holmes Project Historian Gill Boazman ARCHAEOLOGICAL PLANNING CONSULTANCY ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTS CULTURAL HERITAGE STATEMENTS archaeology plan 32 fitzwilliam place dublin 2 tel 01 6761 373 mob 087 2497733 [email protected] www.archaeologyplan.com Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 Report summary Site location Development and planning Methodology 2 Final Excavation Findings 3 Prehistoric wells and fulachtaí fia Early medieval structure 3 References 25 Appendices in companion volume 1 Background, by Gillian Boazman 2 Stratigraphic Report, by David Stone and Antoine Giacometti 3 Brighton Road pottery, by Rose Cleary 4 Brighton Road glass bead, by Mags Mannion 5 Lithic finds report, by Sean Sharpe 6 Coarse Stone Tool Report, by Niamh Kelly 7 Waterlogged plant remains, by Penny Johnston 7 Report On Faunal Material, by Fiona Beglane 8 Charcoal and Wood Report, by Ellen O’ Carroll 9 Radiocarbon dating, by C1 4 Chrono Lab, Queen’ s University 1 0 Archive register 1 1 Context register 1 2 Drawing register 1 3 Photographic register 1 4 Finds register 1 5 Sample register Section 1 Introduction Report Summary Site location A fascinating multi-period site was excavated at The archaeological site was located on 5.2 hec- Brighton Road in Foxrock, Dublin 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Photographyphotography Apr/May 2004
    aa webweb magazinemagazine UnderwaterUnderwater PhotographyPhotography Apr/May 2004 Ikelite 5060 Ikelite D-70 Roatan New macro Fantasea CP-3N Fuji F700 Mokorran Beginners digital Jonah EOS 10D Top Dawg Mini Lumpsuckers Improving WIDE OF THE MARK If you are new to underwater digital photography the equipment can be bewildering. Choosing lenses can be especially confusing. Take wide angles. They’re great in low visibility and essential for photographing large subjects like wrecks and whale sharks. But how wide is wide? 95 to 100 degrees is what most professional underwater photographers consider to be the benchmark or standard wide angle focal length. Narrower angles often just don’t cut it. The Inon UWL100 provides up to 100 degrees. That’s twice the coverage of most cameras’ built in lenses. And substantially wider than the Olympus C5060’s own 70 degree wide angle lens and port combination. Conveniently the UWL100 is also a wetlens. You can remove and replace it underwater, changing lenses to suit your subject. And if you find even 100 degrees restrictive, you can add a dedicated dome port and expand your view by 30%. Inon make some of the best thought through and user friendly accessories for the underwater digital photographer. Ocean Optics continues its quarter century tradition of providing the best equipment, advice and aftersales in the business. 13 Northumberland Avenue [email protected] Ocean London WC2N 5AQ www.oceanoptics.co.uk Tel 020 7930 8408 Optics Fax 020 7839 6148 2 4 Editorial Contents Underwater Photography 6 Readers lives Underwater Photography a web magazine 22 Roatan 35 Improve your Apr/May 2004 8 News & Travel shots e mail [email protected] 12 New products 43 Beginners digital by Peter Rowlands 47 Jessica Taylor by Bruce Dickson 27 Mokorran by Deb Fugitt 15 Fuji F700 by Charles Hood 39 New macro by Jessica Taylor by Charles Hood 50 Calypsophot 31 Lumpsuckers by Steve 17 Top Dawg Warren by Alexander Mustard 53 Reviews Cover by 55 UW Photographers Code of Conduct Deb Fugitt by Peter Rowlands with Mark Webster 3 TTl, D-TTL, I-TTL....
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Treatment Saratoga Lake Year End Report 2011 Complete
    November 29, 2011 John Bennett, Pesticide Control Specialist Bureau of Pesticide Management NYDEC Region 5 Warrensburg Sub-Office 232 Golf Course Road Warrensburg, NY 12885-0220 Re: Annual Report – Saratoga Lake Herbicide Treatment Program – DEC # 5-4199-00002/00008 & 00010 Dear Mr. Bennett: Please accept the following as the Annual Report for the 2011 aquatic herbicide treatment program that was performed in Saratoga Lake. Project Applicant / Saratoga Lake Protection and Improvement District (SLPID) Lead Agency: Applicant Contact: Joe Finn, SLPID Commissioner [518- 581-0409 or [email protected]] Applicator: Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. / Reg . # 07865 Gerald Smith / Applicator ID# C062471 [508-865-1000 or [email protected]] Marc Bellaud / Applicator ID# C0806081 [508-865-1000 or [email protected]] Lake Manager: Dean Long, Director of Environmental Planning, The LA Group, P.C. [518-587-8100 or [email protected]] Vegetation Surveyor: Lawrence Eichler, Research Scientist, Darrin Fresh Water Institute [518-664-3541 or [email protected] ] A summary of the 2011 chemical treatment program performed at the Saratoga Lake is provided below. INTRODUCTION AND RECENT INVASIVE AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT The current invasive aquatic plant management program being conducted on Saratoga Lake is following a comprehensive plan that was developed over several years of investigations and studies. An integrated approach that utilizes winter drawdown, mechanical harvesting, hand-harvesting and herbicide treatments has been employed since 2007. These strategies were detailed in the Watershed Management Plan prepared by The LA Group in 2002, the Long-Term Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan prepared by Aquatic Control Technology in 2005, and the EIS prepared by The LA Group in 2007.
    [Show full text]