DOCSLIB.ORG

The Water Resources (Abstraction and Impounding)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Water Resources (Abstraction and Impounding) IN THE MATTER OF: THE WATER RESOURCES ACT 1991 (AS AMENDED) THE WATER RESOURCES (ABSTRACTION AND IMPOUNDING) REGULATIONS 2006 THE WILDLIFE AND COUNTRYSIDE ACT 1981 (AS AMENDED) THE CONSERVATION OF HABITATS AND SPECIES REGULATIONS 2017 AND IN THE MATTER OF: 1. River Itchen at Twyford and Otterbourne: Abstraction licences 11/42/22.6/92, 11/42/22.6/93, 11/42/22.7/94 PINS reference RSA/WR/00017 2. River Test at Testwood: Abstraction licence 11/42/18.16/546 PINS reference RSA/WR/00018 3. Candover Augmentation Scheme: Abstraction licence SO/042/0031/026 PINS reference RSA/WR/00016 NATURAL ENGLAND’S PRE-INQUIRY STATEMENT Appendix 7 b NE consultation response, Candover Date: 02 November 2016 Our ref: SU43.3/HI/EA Your ref: NPS/WR/021737 Cromwell House, 2nd Environment Agency Floor Permitting and Support Centre 15 Andover Road WINCHESTER Water Resources Team SO23 7BT Quadrant 2 99 Parkway Avenue Sheffield S9 4WF Dear Mr Sir/madam, RIVER ITCHEN SITE OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST RIVER ITCHEN SPECIAL AREA OF CONSERVATION New abstraction licence for the Candover Augmentation Scheme Natural England issued our formal response on the 6th of September 2016, in relation to the previous consultation for this scheme. We have no further comments to add, so please refer back to this response Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any queries. Yours faithfully Charlotte Rose Team leader Hampshire Wildlife licensing and Water Team Dorset, Hampshire & the Isle of Wight Area [email protected] 07717 816 618 Date: 06 September 2016 Our ref: SU 43.1/HI/EA Your ref: SO/042/0031/026 nd Mr Graham Melhuish Cromwell house, 2 Floor Senior Permitting Officer - Water 15 Andover Road Resources WINCHESTER National Permitting Service SO23 7BT Environment Agency Manley House Kestrel Way Exeter DEVON EX2 7LQ. Dear Mr Melhuish RIVER ITCHEN SITE OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST (SSSI) RIVER ITCHEN SPECIAL AREA OF CONSERVATION (SAC) Abstraction licence (renewal) Candover Groundwater Augmentation Scheme – River Itchen (EA, Hampshire CoC) NPS/WR/021737 Thank you for your email of 12 August 2016, requesting the assent of Natural England for the above works. Natural England supports the move towards a more sustainable abstraction regime on the River Itchen SSSI and SAC. We largely agree with the improvements to the licence suggested. Assessment under Regulation 21 of the Habitats Regulations We agree with the conclusion that this proposal is likely to have a significant effect on the interest features of the above SAC, both alone – due to possible impacts on crayfish - and in-combination with extant abstraction licenses at Totford and Lasham. The proposal therefore requires an appropriate assessment in accordance with Regulation 21 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (‘The Habitat Regulations’). We agree with the conclusion of the Appropriate Assessment that, with further conditions on the operation of the scheme, the proposal will not have an adverse impact on the integrity of the SAC. This is principally due to the significant reduction in total licence volume, conditions that reduce frequency of operation combined with time limited nature of the licence. Assent under Section 28H of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 Natural England assents to the proposals contained in the notice dated 12 August 2016 under Section 28H of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, subject to the following conditions: Prior to the EA issuing the abstraction licence, NE and the EA should agree to the circumstances or scenarios under which the scheme should be used Add a definition of ‘normal flows’ to the conditions box on successive use It is our view that, if the above conditions are adhered to, the operation should not cause any damage to the special interest of the SSSI. Please note this permission is valid from 06 September 2016 until 31 December 2022. Should you wish to alter the operations or timings detailed in your notice you are required to give further notice to Natural England. This letter does not constitute land owner permission nor a wayleave agreement, we recommend that you contact the landowner and make all provisions necessary before any works commence. Please contact me if you wish to discuss these comments further. Yours sincerely Charlotte Rose Team leader Hampshire Wildlife licensing and water Team Dorset, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight Area 07717 816 618 [email protected] Date: 14th July 2016 Ref: CAS.lr.2016 2nd Floor, Cromwell House 15, Andover Road Winchester Hampshire SO23 7BT Dear Tim RIVER ITCHEN SITE OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST RIVER ITCHEN SPECIAL AREA OF CONSERVATION Operator: Environment Agency Proposal: Renewal of Candover abstraction and augmentation license Thank you for inviting Natural England to comment on the three draft reports and appropriate assessment of the impacts of the use of the Candover Augmentation Scheme (“the Candover licence”) on the designated features of the River Itchen SSSI and SAC and the wider priority habitats. This letter contains Natural England’s informal advice; we will issue our statutory advice in response to the Environment Agency’s formal consultation. In summary: Natural England is minded to advise, based on the evidence provided that the Candover licence can be renewed with all the conditions proposed including the time limit suggested in the draft documents provided an additional condition is added. The additional condition should prohibit the use of the Candover licence until a review of the impacts on the terrestrial wetlands and a review of sustainability of the upper Itchen abstraction licences in combination (described in more detail below) is completed, and any measures to ensure there will be no adverse impacts/ significant harm are secured. This is to ensure there is sufficient information to complete the “continued environmental sustainability” test for this licence. Natural England remains of the opinion that this type of abstraction in the headwaters of a designated river valley, combined with river augmentation, is not an alternative to, nor is it a necessary part of a sustainable abstraction regime and is not necessary for the conservation of the designated sites. Not-withstanding the above, we have considered the case presented in detail and are minded to provide the following advice: Need for the review of the licence Natural England notes that in the River Basin Management Plan we have consulted on jointly agreed targets and interim goals for monitoring the condition of the River Itchen SSSI/SAC. Before 2021, the Environment Agency and Natural England have agreed to try to reach agreement on long term targets as close to the agreed revised Common Standards Monitoring Guidance (rCSMG) targets as possible. New licences will be assessed against these targets. For time limited licences, such as the Candover licence, the Environment Agency Briefing note states: ‘The Environment Agency and Natural England have agreed that where expired time limited licences have been previously assessed as compliant with designated site requirements, the previous assessment will hold if no other information has changed and the licence will be issued on the same terms. This is provided that no other information about the sustainability of the licence and/or the site has changed. Licences will be reviewed where a condition assessment has shown that changes are needed’. The SSSI units in the upper Itchen are in unfavourable condition and abstraction is either a threat or a remedy. Though the Candover licence has been considered against the Special Area of Conservation (SAC) features in the Environment Agency Review of Consents (EA RoC), Natural England did not agree with the conclusions with respect to the Candover licence. In addition, the impacts of the Candover licence on the non-SAC designated site features of the Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) has never previously been assessed. Considerable changes in the operation of licences acting in combination in the upper Itchen have occurred since the EA RoC. It is clear that the Candover licence is not compliant with all designated site requirements as some were not assessed. The condition assessment indicates changes are needed and additional information on the sustainability of the licence has also become available since RoC. In conclusion, Natural England supports the need to review the environmental sustainability of the Candover licence. Impacts on the SAC of use of the Candover alone When it is used, the licence causes failure of rCSMG of considerable degree but only the augmentation (i.e. the flows above natural). At low flows after use (alone) failures are minimal once the SAC boundary is reached. However the pump test identified a potential impact on the crayfish of the augmentation of flows. The scheme therefore has a likely significant affect alone for impacts on crayfish. To mitigate the failure of rCSMG from augmentation above flows, significant conditions have been added including ramping up and ramping down along with conditions to prevent successive years of use and to limit frequency of use. The full licence cannot be used more than once every 8 years and in reality is likely to be used very much less frequently. Therefore, though the failure of the rCSMG (mainly above) for flow regime are large, the frequency of failure has been significantly curtailed by the conditions to be no more than 8 years and likely to be less than this. Given all the mitigation measures for the flows above rCSMG that impact the white clawed crayfish and potentially invertebrates and the infrequency of use of the licence as well as the relatively marginal failure at the SAC boundary of flows below the rCSMG of Candover alone, Natural England is minded to concur with the Environment Agency position that the Candover scheme when used on its own with all the conditions proposed, though having a likely significant effect, does not have an adverse effect on integrity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landowner Deposits Register
    Register of Landowner Deposits under Highways Act 1980 and Commons Act 2006 The first part of this register contains entries for all CA16 combined deposits received since 1st October 2013, and these all have scanned copies of the deposits attached. The second part of the register lists entries for deposits made before 1st October 2013, all made under section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980. There are a large number of these, and the only details given here currently are the name of the land, the parish and the date of the deposit. We will be adding fuller details and scanned documents to these entries over time. List of deposits made - last update 12 January 2017 CA16 Combined Deposits Deposit Reference: 44 - Land at Froyle (The Mrs Bootle-Wilbrahams Will Trust) Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/countryside/Deposit44-Bootle-WilbrahamsTrustLand-Froyle-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Crispin Mahony of Savills on behalf of The Parish: Froyle Mrs Bootle-WilbrahamWill Trust, c/o Savills (UK) Froyle Jewry Chambers,44 Jewry Street, Winchester Alton Hampshire Hampshire SO23 8RW GU34 4DD Date of Statement: 14/11/2016 Grid Reference: 733.416 Deposit Reference: 98 - Tower Hill, Dummer Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/rightsofway/Deposit98-LandatTowerHill-Dummer-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Jamie Adams & Madeline Hutton Parish: Dummer 65 Elm Bank Gardens, Up Street Barnes, Dummer London Basingstoke SW13 0NX RG25 2AL Date of Statement: 27/08/2014 Grid Reference: 583. 458 Deposit Reference:
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Watercress Farming on Stream Ecosystem Functioning and Community Structure
    Impacts of watercress farming on stream ecosystem functioning and community structure. Cotter, Shaun The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/8385 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] Impacts of watercress farming on stream ecosystem functioning and community structure Shaun Cotter School of Biological and Chemical Sciences Queen Mary, University of London Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London September 2012 1 Abstract. Despite the increased prominence of ecological measurement in fresh waters within recent national regulatory and legislative instruments, their assessment is still almost exclusively based on taxonomic structure. Integrated metrics of structure and function, though widely advocated, to date have not been incorporated into these bioassessment programmes. We sought to address this, by assessing community structure (macroinvertebrate assemblage composition) and ecosystem functioning (decomposition, primary production, and herbivory rates), in a series of replicated field experiments, at watercress farms on the headwaters of chalk streams, in southern England. The outfalls from watercress farms are typically of the highest chemical quality, however surveys have revealed long-term (30 years) impacts on key macroinvertebrate taxa, in particular the freshwater shrimp Gammarus pulex (L.), yet the ecosystem-level consequences remain unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • SUIAG Journal No 1 1992
    ISSN 0967-3474 Southampton University Industrial Archaeology Group Journal www.hias.org.uk from Downloaded SjM'' V. i : ■& ! ' ^ >vi a mm. N o . 1 N o v e m b e r 1992 Southampton University Industrial Archaeology Group Journal www.hias.org.uk from Downloaded Published by Southampton University Archaeology Group ©Copyright 1992 individual authors and Southampton University Archaeology Group All rights reserved Editor: Dr Edwin Course ISSN 0967-3474 Produced by Wessex Archaeology Printed by Salisbury Printing www.hias.org.uk from Downloaded Contents Contributors........................................................................................................................................................ iii Editorial and Acknowledgements................................................................................................................. iv The Restoration of the Golden Lion Brewhouse, Southwick bif Pam Moore ............................................................................................................................................ 1 The Restoration of Bursledon Windmill by John Reynolds ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Watercress Growing in Hampshie: a Forgotten Industry? by Steve Fletcher and Dave Goodwin..........................................................................................................15 Restoring a Southampton Tram by Angela Smith..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire~ Winchester, 635
    - ' .. 1HRECTOR \". J HAMPSHIRE~ WINCHESTER, 635 Jleaical Officer of Health, Gem•ge A11.)rn~ns EdwM-d St. John's House Asseni.blf ltol)ms, High street R®ert~ :M.R.C.S.Eng., 'D.P.H.R.O.P.S.Lond. T"wyford Soldiers' Homes~ Hyde close & High at.Chaa.Edward,Sll:Pfi Sanitary Inspector, Daniel Denham, East.on ~urteyor, Goorge Edward Carter, 105 High street WINOHESTER UNIO:N'. Board meetings at the Union hou~m every alternate HIGH COURT JUSTICE, ' OF aaturday, at II a.m.· Di stric~ Registry. The Winchester Union compris~s "tbe following parishes 8 St. ThDmas street. under the "Poor Law Act, IB34 "' & subsequent District Registrar, Charlea Edward Godwin orders of the Local Government Board :-Abbots Ba.rton, .A.ringtor., Bishopstoke, Chilcomb Without, Probate Division. Compto:n, Crawley. East on, Fair Oak, H&adbourne ObDfpriaing t.he County of Rants, including the town of Worthy, Huntqn, It~hen .A.bba.s, ~~~ Worthy, Southampton & Isle of Wigbt. Lainston, Littleton, Martyr Worthy, Mich.eldev!n', 4 St. Peter street. MorBitead, Ow111lebury, Spa.rsholt, Stoke Charity, Stoke Regi!trar, Charles 'W ooldridge Park, Stratton (Ea6t), Twyford, Weeke Without, Win­ Chief Qerk, William ChaTle11 Gaiger ch6f!ter & Wons-ton. The population of the union in I9II was 36,139; area, 62,565 acres; rateable value, PUBLIC ESTABLISHMENTS. Lady Day, 19u, £246,565 Cemetery Co. Office, r7 Southgate st. Alired Bowker, Clerk to the Gua.rdians & .Auessment Committee, Frank eec.; Eldred Deavin, clerk k f!exton; Cemetery, St. Faithfull, 105 High street Jame-s's lane Chairman of the Board of Guardians, William .A.
    [Show full text]
  • ALRESFORD SHOW by Robert Hedges "A Delightful Little Country Show," Remarked a Cattle Judge on One Occasion, "And
    ALRESFORD SHOW By Robert Hedges "A delightful little country show," remarked a cattle judge on one occasion, "and run by such pleasant people!" The sense of enjoyment and success implicit in this spontaneous reaction was engendered in 1908 and has been fostered by several generations of presidents, officers and committee members ever since. As the farming year moves almost imperceptibly through changing scenes of work and weather to its culmination in the rewards of maturity and harvest, so the Alresford Shaw has developed through periods of fluctuating fortunes to its high level of excellence under enlightened management - at the same time cautious and imaginative, conservative and progressive - that has nursed it gently along from year to year, absorbing the pressures of scientific advancement, government policy and popular demand and somehow contriving to present annually a charming, traditional picture of Hampshire country life at its civilised best. Shows can vary in size from the man who humiliates his fellow gardeners by displaying an enormous potato in the local bar to the bewildering magnitude of a great national event. The Alresford Show has grown over the years and has now probably reached its optimum. But how did it start? Well, it was during the week when the suffragette Mrs. Parkhurst appeared at Bow Street on a charge of incitement to "rush" the Commons; when John Lee was brought before the Alresford Bench, charged with begging on Pound Hill; and when the Labour-Liberal candidate for the East Hants Division faced a hostile audience at Old Alresford School. Mr. T. C. Hankin, the landlord of the Swan Hotel (but soon to start the family motorcar business), was serving whisky at 2d a tot and beer at 2d a pint to a special group of gentlemen seated before a log fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Carter Families of Barton Stacey F1C2
    Barton Stacey History Group The Carter Families of Barton Stacey F1C2 THE CARTER FAMILIES OF BARTON STACEY, HAMPSHIRE, 1710s-present by Linda Moffatt © 2018 for the Barton Stacey History Group If you can add to or correct anything in this account, please contact us via our website www.bartonstaceyhistory.co.uk There have been Carter families in the parish of Barton Stacey since at least 1700. However, it has not been possible to connect them in a line of descent. The name was common in adjacent parishes and it appears that they moved between parishes over the years. This account includes: • GEORGE CARTER of Newton Stacey (Barton Stacey parish), died 1732. • JOHN CARTER of Barton Stacey, born perhaps early 1760s, died 1837, married Ann Baverstock on 7 October 1782 at Bullington, Hampshire. • CHARLES CARTER of Bransbury (Barton Stacey parish), born in Wherwell in 1812, lived in Bransbury until 1876, married 1. Jane Pearcey, married 2. Harriet Cooper. • THOMAS CARTER, of Hill Farm, Barton Stacey in the 1870s. • HENRY CARTER, farm worker of Tangley and Newton Stacey, born about 1835 in Mildenhall, Wiltshire, married Emily Burgess, moved around 1865 to Newton Stacey. Their descendants are still in the parish of Barton Stacey today. 18th Century There is evidence of two men called George Carter living in the parish of Barton Stacey in the early 18th century. The parish registers of All Saints have survived only from 1713 and it is possible that there were members of a Carter family in the parish before that date. Further, we can speculate that these two men were father and son, rather than cousins.
    [Show full text]
  • ALRESFORD Free Local Guide and a to Z Directory Local Guide Free a to Z Directory ALRESFORD a to Z GUIDE INDEX INDEX Index Contents
    INDEXIndex SPONSORSSponsors LocalHISTORY History A TOto ZZ LocalLOCAL Adverts FIRMS UsefulKEY NUMBERS Numbers FreeADD Listing ENTRY Useful Numbers Local History A to Z A to Kindly SupportedKindly by ALRESFORD Free local guide and A to Z directory Free A to Z Directory ALRESFORD A TO Z GUIDE INDEX INDEX Index Contents This menu is interactive - click on any link to jump straight to your desired classification. The coloured tabs to the right are also live links to help you navigate quickly through the guide. Accountancy IT Support Takeaway Food SPONSORS Antiques Jewellers Taxis & Private Hire Sponsors Architects Kitchen Sales and Theatres Bed and Breakfast Fitting Travel Agents Behaviourists Landscape Venues For Hire Business Services Gardeners Web Design Welcome to your Cafes Libraries Websites local A to Z guide. Car Body Repairs Motorcyle Sales and Zoos HistoryLocal We hope that you find it Car Dealers Repair HISTORY both interesting and useful. Our aim is to utilise the Carpenters Opticians advantages of the modern technology to provide you Carpet Cleaning PA Sound Systems with the information that Carpet Shops Painters and you need, whenever you need it. Central Heating Decorators Charities Pet Shops You can download this edition by clicking on ‘file’ Chemists Photographers then ‘save as’ and choosing Childcare Places of Interest A TO Z a suitable location on your A to Z computer. This will give you Chiropractors Plumbers permanent access without Churches Police having to log on to the Internet. Clubs & Societies Post Offices One of the biggest Computer Sales & Pre Schools advantages of an online Repairs Printers guide like this is that we can Local AdvertsLocal continue to add information Dentists Pubs FIRMS LOCAL without the need for print or Doctors Removals distribution costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Act 1990 LIST of NEW PLANNING and OTHER
    Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 LIST OF NEW PLANNING AND OTHER APPLICATIONS, RECEIVED AND VALID IN PARISH/TOWN WARD ORDER WEEKLY LIST AS AT 14 June 2020 For Guidance 1 Those applications which have a star by them are FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. Please see over for a list and description of application types. 2 If the Grid Reference is blank, this is because it is a property which is in the process of being entered on the Property Database for the District. 3 The Conservation Area only appears where the application is known to be in a Conservation Area . 4 Where the application has not been allocated to a case officer, “Team Manager “ for the relevant area appears instead. 5 The Publicity Period is 21 days after the Site Notice Date or 21 days after a Press Advert date, where this has been made, whichever is the later. Applications may be determined after this date. If you require any further information, please enquire at Main Reception, City Offices, Colebrook Street, Winchester, SO23 9LJ quoting the Case Number. We will then be able to give you the current status of the application. We are open Monday to Thursday 8.30am - 5.00pm, Fridays 8.30am - 4.30pm, excluding Bank and Public Holidays. Page 1 APPLICATION CODES AND DESCRIPTION AVC Full Advert Consent AVT Temporary Advert Consent (non-standard time limit) AGA Agricultural Application APN Agricultural Prior Notification CER Certificate of Alternative Use CHU Change of Use DEC Demolition Consultation EUC Established Use
    [Show full text]
  • Abbotstone: a Deserted Medieval Village
    ABBOTSTONE: A DESERTED MEDIEVAL VILLAGE By ISABEL SANDERSON EDITORIAL NOTE This article and that by Frances Collins and J. Oliver on the village of Lomer, which follows {pp. 67-76), describe and discuss two of over go known deserted medieval villages in Hampshire, exclusive of those destroyed to make the New Forest. Lists, descriptions and general discussion of such villages and of the changing economic and political forces thought to lie behind the widespread shrinking and desertion of villages throughout late medieval western Europe, will be found in recent works by Allison1 and by Beresford and Hurst.* THE ancient parish of Abbotstone (Grid Reference SU 5635) lies on rising ground on the eastern side of the Candover valley, some two miles from the town of New Alresford and due north of the village of Itchen Stoke, with which parish it was joined as long ago as 1589.* No map shows all the boundaries of this ancient parish but from the Tithe Map of 1838 for Itchen Stoke with the Rectory of Abbotstone they can be located.4 This map was prepared after the parish had been surveyed and gives the names, boundaries and acreages of all the fields. Dwellings, farm buildings and roads are also marked and in the accompanying Tithe Apportionment the names of land­ owners and occupiers are given, together with valuable particulars of the fields once belonging to the old Rectory of Abbotstone and separately, those of Itchen Stoke. It is clear from this that the boundary between the two parishes before they were consoli­ dated was near or along the Candover stream.
    [Show full text]
  • Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990
    WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL DECISIONS MADE BY THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS IN WINCHESTER DISTRICT, PARISH, TOWN AND WARD UP TO 5 July 2015 Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 DECISIONS MADE BY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS UNDER DELEGATED POWERS UP TO 5 July 2015 For Guidance 1. Please note that if you wish to view the full decision details, which include any conditions or reasons for refusal, these can be accessed via the public access facility within the planning area of the council’s web site. The following link will take you to the relevant area where the case can be accessed using the quoted case number on the below list and clicking the ‘associated documents’ tab and searching the documents list for ‘decision’. Similarly the case officer’s report can be viewed in the case of delegated decisions, which explains the considerations taken into account in determining the application. Planning Applications Online Please note that there is a slight delay between the date that a decision is made and the date the decision notice is displayed on the website. The decision notice will be published to the website 2 days after the date of the decision. 2. Reports and minutes of applications determined by the planning committee can be viewed in the committees section of the council’s web site, which can be accessed via the following link. Planning Development Control Committee If you require any further information, please enquire at Planning Reception, City Offices, Colebrook Street, Winchester, SO23 9LJ quoting the Case Number.
    [Show full text]
  • Sector Distribution
    Average weekly distribution Publisher’s Statement Mar ‘10; 80,344 Average weekly readership JICREG Apr ’10; N/A A 27 2 LOCKERLEY KIMBRIDGE BRAISHFIELD HURSLEY TWYFORD MORESTEAD AWBRIDGE AMPFIELD OTTERBOURNE OWSLEBURY SHOOTASH CRAMPMOOR COLDEN COMMON ROMSEY UPHAM EAST WELLOW CHANDLERS FORD PLAITFORD BLACKHILL ASHFIELD EASTLEIGH FAIR OAK LEE M 27 OWER ROWNHAMS BRAMSHAW DURLEY CALMORE BROOK WEST END WINSOR TOTTON CURDRIDGE BARTLEY SOUTHAMPTON HEDGE END MINSTEAD ASHURST MARCHWOOD BURRIDGE BURSLEDON WHITELEY NETLEY LYNDHURST HYTHE LOCKS HEATH WARSASH TITCHFIELD HOLBURY FAWLEY STUBBINGTON BROCKENHURST BEAULIEU CALSHOT EAST BOLDRE EXBURY SWAY BOLDRE PORTMORE EAST END HORDLE LYMINGTON COWES West Edition Established Content East Edition July 2006 Property Frequency Community News Weekly (Thursday) Entertainment Classified Cover price Recruitment Free Motoring Household Coverage Page size 61%* 32x9 *Publisher’s Statement Mar 2010 & TGI 2008 Postal sector breakdown West Edition: East Edition: Sector Distribution Sector Distribution SO14 3 756 PO15 7 1433 SO15 0 470 SO18 1 2721 SO15 1 202 SO18 2 2489 SO15 2 2046 SO18 3 1849 SO15 3 2124 SO18 4 1584 SO15 4 1079 SO18 5 2699 SO15 5 4224 SO18 6 944 SO15 7 798 SO19 0 1711 SO15 8 1381 SO19 1 1059 SO16 0 370 SO19 2 2013 SO16 2 200 SO19 4 478 SO16 3 3196 SO19 5 285 SO16 4 938 SO19 6 1362 SO16 5 2152 SO19 7 2084 SO16 6 2429 SO19 8 3422 SO16 7 1572 SO19 9 3256 SO16 8 4369 SO31 1 125 SO16 9 955 SO31 4 1370 SO17 1 2650 SO31 5 1935 SO17 2 2363 SO31 6 2935 SO17 3 1080 SO40 2 381 SO31 7 916 SO40 3 2940 SO31 8 2021
    [Show full text]
  • (Old) Alresford (Old) Alresford
    (Old) Alresford (Old) Alresford 1.0 PARISH Old Alresford (Map 1) 2.0 HUNDRED Fawley 3.0 NGR 458610 133680 4.0 GEOLOGY Upper Chalk; River Valley Gravel 5.0 SITE CONTEXT (Map 2) The parish of Old Alresford (now including Godsfield) is c. 8km in length extending from the District boundary of East Hampshire in the north-east to the river Itchen at Itchen Stoke in the south-west. For much of its length the parish is c. 1.6km wide. The principal settlement is also known as Old Alresford (c. 70m AOD) and this is situated towards the south-west end of the parish, in the valley of the river Alre. The area is noted for its watercress beds and these can be seen to the west and to the south-east of Old Alresford. Just 1km to the south is the later medieval town of New Alresford but this is now administratively separate from the parent parish. 6.0 PLAN TYPE & DESCRIPTION (Maps 3, 4 and 5) Church & manor house + regular rows 6.1 Church & manor house The church of St Mary is probably C12 (or earlier) in origin but major rebuilding programmes in the C18 and C19 have left almost no evidence of the medieval building. The church stands upon a low knoll, a feature that suggests a pre-Christian or early Christian origin for the site. Less than 50m east-north-east of the church stands Old Alresford (manor) House. This building is C18 but it is on the site of a medieval predecessor. In an account of Old Alresford written in the C18 (Sumner, 192 : 335), GB Rodney tells of a tradition whereby the juries of the manorial Court Leet met at a certain spot in the garden of the House.
    [Show full text]