Impacts of Watercress Farming on Stream Ecosystem Functioning and Community Structure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Impacts of Watercress Farming on Stream Ecosystem Functioning and Community Structure Impacts of watercress farming on stream ecosystem functioning and community structure. Cotter, Shaun The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/8385 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] Impacts of watercress farming on stream ecosystem functioning and community structure Shaun Cotter School of Biological and Chemical Sciences Queen Mary, University of London Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London September 2012 1 Abstract. Despite the increased prominence of ecological measurement in fresh waters within recent national regulatory and legislative instruments, their assessment is still almost exclusively based on taxonomic structure. Integrated metrics of structure and function, though widely advocated, to date have not been incorporated into these bioassessment programmes. We sought to address this, by assessing community structure (macroinvertebrate assemblage composition) and ecosystem functioning (decomposition, primary production, and herbivory rates), in a series of replicated field experiments, at watercress farms on the headwaters of chalk streams, in southern England. The outfalls from watercress farms are typically of the highest chemical quality, however surveys have revealed long-term (30 years) impacts on key macroinvertebrate taxa, in particular the freshwater shrimp Gammarus pulex (L.), yet the ecosystem-level consequences remain unknown. Initial studies were at Europe’s largest watercress farm at St Mary Bourne, Hampshire, during the bioremediation of its complex wastewaters and changes to farm management practices. These widened to include larger scale spatiotemporal studies at other watercress farms. Detrimental ecological impacts at the start of the study were detected by the structural and functioning measures, but they did not respond to bioremediation. However, an increase in G. pulex abundance was detected, providing evidence of recovery in response to altered practices, which may be attributable to the cessation of chlorine use. The detrimental impacts were unique to the St Mary Bourne watercress farm and were not consistent across the other watercress farms in the study. Our results demonstrate the importance of integrated metrics of both ecosystem structure and functioning, to derive a more comprehensive view of aquatic ecosystems 2 and highlights the difficulties associated with extrapolating from laboratory studies in response to stressors. Acknowledgements. I am deeply indebted to a number of people and organisations for their support and guidance over the last few years, from the projects inception one afternoon in Winchester to the completion of this PhD. I am extremely grateful to my first supervisor Dr. Guy Woodward for his unerring patience, enthusiasm (knowledge on fire) and assistance throughout the life of this project, without which this would not have been possible. Thank you also to Prof. Alan Hildrew my second supervisor and also to Guy for their comments, advice and discussions on the direction and scope of the work undertaken to underpin and present this thesis. I am very grateful to Graham Roberts of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust who put me in touch with Vitacress salads and their Technical Director Dr. Steve Rothwell, which allowed the initial research idea to become reality and for the project to begin. I am thankful to Vitacress who also allowed me unrestricted access to their watercress farms and for their financial help in the early stages of the project. I would also like to thank Shirley Medgett of the Environment Agency (EA) for access to her invaluable local knowledge, professional expertise, EA laboratory services and for financial assistance over the fieldwork stages of this project. I have had a number of friends assist and accompany me on my early morning sojourns for the collection of samples and the deployment of sampling arrays, I send a special thank you to Chris Dyer, Sue Philbey and Dave and Fergus Crawley. I also 3 thank Charmaine Grieger for her advice and assistance with Photoshop and the proof reading of an early draft of this thesis. And saving the best to last, I am extremely grateful to my parents Dr. John Leon and Marian Cotter for always providing the right environment, for their belief and for being there… 4 Table of Contents. Abstract............................................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgements...........................................................................................................3 Table of contents...............................................................................................................5 List of tables......................................................................................................................8 List of figures...................................................................................................................10 List of plates....................................................................................................................12 1. General Introduction.................................................................................................13 1.1. Allochthonous pathways...........................................................................................16 1.2. The relative importance of decomposers and detritivores. ......................................18 1.3. Autochthonous pathways…......................................................................................19 1.4. Ecosystem functioning measures..............................................................................23 1.5. Chalk streams and watercress farming…….............................................................23 1.6. The problem at St Mary Bourne and other watercress farms and its remediation...27 1.7. Aims and structure of the thesis. .............................................................................35 1.8. References................................................................................................................39 2. Study Sites..................................................................................................................51 2.1. The Watercress farms...............................................................................................55 2.2. Study site…………………………………………………………………………..58 2.3. St Mary Bourne watercress farm, bed layout and operational detail………………62 2.4. Temporal study, Chapter 6.......................................................................................63 2.5. Spatial study, Chapter 6…........................................................................................63 2.6. References…............................................................................................................76 5 3. General Methods..........................................................................................................................78 3.1. Physical and chemical analyses of stream water......................................................78 3.2. Biological sampling…..............................................................................................79 3.2.1. Functional measures…..........................................................................................79 3.2.2. Structural measures................................................................................................88 3.3. Data analysis and transformations............................................................................88 3.4. References................................................................................................................91 4. Watercress production alters stream ecosystem functioning and community structure………….........................................................................................................93 4.1. Introduction………..................................................................................................93 4.2. Methods……….……...............................................................................................94 4.3. Results......................................................................................................................94 4.4. Discussion...............................................................................................................112 4.5. References..............................................................................................................115 5. Stream ecosystem functioning and structure metrics to assess a surrogate wetlands bioremediation of complex discharges at Europe’s largest watercress farm ..............................................................................................................................119 5.1. Introduction............................................................................................................119 5.2. Methods..................................................................................................................121 5.3. Results....................................................................................................................122
Recommended publications
  • THE FREE WESSEX ARTS and CULTURE GUIDE EVOLVER May and June 2019 EVOLVER 111:Layout 1 23/04/2019 18:50 Page 2
    EVOLVER_111:Layout 1 23/04/2019 18:49 Page 1 THE FREE WESSEX ARTS AND CULTURE GUIDE EVOLVER May and June 2019 EVOLVER_111:Layout 1 23/04/2019 18:50 Page 2 2 EVOLVER_111:Layout 1 23/04/2019 18:50 Page 3 EVOLVER 111 EXHIBIT A ZARA MCQUEEN: ‘AS THE CROW FLIES’ Mixed media (120 x 150 cm) ARTIST’S STATEMENT: “Drawing and painting is part of who I am. It is how I respond to my world. I am driven by mood and intuition. I always begin outside. In that sense I am a landscape painter. Seasonal changes catch my attention and I can rarely resist the changing colours and textures of the natural year. I sketch and paint in watercolour, charcoal or oil then return to the studio where I make larger mixed media pieces guided by memory and feeling. Work gets cut down, torn up, collaged and reformed. Fragments of self portraits often lay hidden in fields, branches or buildings.” ‘DRAWN IN’ 11 May - 15 June: Bridport Arts Centre, South Street, BRIDPORT, DT6 3NR. Tuesday - Saturday 10am - 4pm. 01308 424204 / bridport-arts.com. zara-mcqueen.co.uk EVOLVER Email [email protected] THE WESSEX ARTS AND CULTURE GUIDE Telephone 01935 808441 Editor SIMON BARBER Website evolver.org.uk Assisted by SUZY RUSHBROOK Instagram evolvermagazine Evolver Writer Twitter @SimonEvolver FIONA ROBINSON www.fionarobinson.com Facebook facebook.com/EvolverMagazine Graphic Design SIMON BARBER Published by EVOLVER MEDIA LIMITED Website OLIVER CONINGHAM at AZTEC MEDIA Pre-Press by FLAYDEMOUSE Front Cover 01935 479453 / flaydemouse.com JEREMY GARDINER: ‘WEST BAY IV’ Printed by STEPHENS & GEORGE (Painting) Distributed by ACOUSTIC See page 4.
    [Show full text]
  • South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East River Basin District
    South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East river basin district March 2016 Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2016 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Contents Glossary and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 The layout of this document ........................................................................................................ 7 1 Sub-areas in the South East river basin district .............................................................. 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 9 Flood Risk Areas ......................................................................................................................... 9 Management catchments ............................................................................................................ 9 2 Conclusions, objectives and measures to manage risk for the Brighton and Hove Flood Risk Area..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Draft
    Upper Clatford Neighbourhood Development Plan 2019-2029 Submission draft DJN Planning Limited · March 2020 · For Upper Clatford Parish Council [this page blank] 1 CONTENTS Page 1. SETTING THE SCENE 1 Introduction 1 Format of the Neighbourhood Development Plan 1 National and local planning policy context 2 2. UPPER CLATFORD NEIGHBOURHOOD AREA 5 Key issues 7 3. VISION AND OBJECTIVES 9 Vision 9 Objectives 9 4. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT – policy UC1 11 5. COMMUNITY 12 Community services, facilities and recreation – policy UC2 12 Housing mix – policy UC3 15 6. ECONOMY 18 Small-scale employment development – policy UC4 18 Renewable and low carbon energy projects – policy UC5 20 7. BUILT ENVIRONMENT 24 Design – policy UC6 24 Upper Clatford Conservation Area – policy UC7 27 8. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 33 Landscape character – policy UC8 33 Landscape and settlement views – policy UC9 39 Andover – Anna Valley/Upper Clatford Local Gap – policy UC10 46 Local Green Spaces – policy UC11 53 Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation – policy UC12 59 9. DELIVERING THE PLAN 63 Community actions 63 PLANS 1 Upper Clatford Neighbourhood Area 5 2 Community services and facilities 14 3 Open space and recreational land and buildings 14 4 Location of existing solar farms 21 5 Upper Clatford Conservation Area Character Appraisal Map 30 6 Landscape Character Types and Landscape Character Areas 34 7 Landscape views 40 8 Settlement views 43 9 Local Gap component areas 49 10 Local Green Spaces 55 11 Current Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation 60 12 Proposed Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation 61 APPENDIX A: Evidence base 66 All photographs have been taken by John Baxter and Rob Hall who have granted permission to use them in the NDP.
    [Show full text]
  • Vebraalto.Com
    01305 340860 Independent Property Consultants and Valuers Clyffe House, Tincleton £285,000 Offered for sale with no forward chain is this delightful Grade II character cottage, favourably situated within the sought after hamlet of Tincleton. The property offers a great opportunity to acquire a beautifully maintained residence that has been sympathetically renovated and updated by the current owners to create a wonderful home that enjoys an abundance of character and original features. Forming part of the exclusive conversion of Clyffe House, the property benefits from the use of the peaceful communal gardens, a freehold garage and private off road parking. 7 The Courtyard Clyffe House, Tincleton, Dorset, DT2 8QR Situation Situated approximately five miles from the county town of Dorchester, Tincleton is a peaceful and idyllic Dorset village with all the advantages of proximity to major towns with excellent shopping and dining facilities and rail services to London Waterloo (approximately 2.5 hours from Dorchester). Nearby Dorchester is steeped in history enjoying a central position along the Jurassic Coastline and also some of the county's most noted period architecture, all set amongst a beautiful rural countryside. Dorchester offers a plethora of shopping and social facilities. Two cinemas, several museums, History centre, leisure centre, weekly market, many excellent restaurants and public houses and riverside walks. The catchment schools are highly rated and very popular with those in and around the Dorchester area. Doctors, dentist surgeries and the Dorset County Hospital are close by. There are major train links to London Waterloo, Bristol Temple Meads and Weymouth and other coastal towns and villages, and regular bus routes to nearby towns.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainfall Thresholds for Flow Generation in Desert Ephemeral
    Water Resources Research RESEARCH ARTICLE Rainfall Thresholds for Flow Generation 10.1029/2018WR023714 in Desert Ephemeral Streams 1 1 2 1 Key Points: Stephanie K. Kampf G!), Joshua Faulconer , Jeremy R. Shaw G!), Michael Lefsky , Rainfall thresholds predict 3 2 streamflow responses with high Joseph W. Wagenbrenner G!), and David J. Cooper G!) accuracy in small hyperarid and 1 2 semiarid watersheds Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, Department 3 Using insufficient rain data usually of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, FortCollins, Colorado, USA, USDA Forest Service, Pacific increases threshold values for larger Southwest Research Station, Arcata, California,USA watersheds, leading to apparent scale dependence in thresholds Declines in flow frequency and Rainfall thresholds for streamflow generation are commonly mentioned in the literature, but increases in thresholds with drainage Abstract area are steeper in hyperarid than in studies rarely include methods for quantifying and comparing thresholds. This paper quantifies thresholds semiarid watersheds in ephemeral streams and evaluates how they are affected by rainfall and watershed properties. The study sites are in southern Arizona, USA; one is hyperarid and the other is semiarid. At both sites rainfall and 3 2 2 Supporting Information: streamflow were monitored in watersheds ranging from 10- to 10 km . Streams flowed an average of 0-5 • Supporting Information 51 times per year in hyperarid watersheds and 3-11 times per year in semiarid watersheds. Although hyperarid sites had fewer flow events, their flow frequency (fraction of rain events causing flow) was higher than in Correspondence to: 2 semiarid sites for small ( < 1 km ) watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset History Centre
    GB 0031 D.1383 Dorset History Centre This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 40810 The National Archives D.1383 DORSET GUIDE ASSOCIATION 1 MID DORSET DIVISION 1/1 Minute Book (1 vol) 1971-1990 2 1ST CERNE ABBA S GUIDE COMPAN Y 2/1 Company Register (lvol) ' 1953-1965 3 1ST OWERMOIGN E BROWNIE PACK 3/1 Pack Register (1 vol) 1959-1962 3/2 Account Book (1 vol) 1959-1966 4 1ST OWERMOIGN E GUIDE COMPAN Y 4/1 Account Book (1 vol) 1959-1966 D.1383 DORSET GUIDE ASSOCIATION 5 SWANAGE AND DISTRICT GIRL GUIDES A5 HANDBOOKS A5/1 Girl Guiding: The Official Handbook by Sir Robert Baden-Powell, detailing the aims and methods of the organisation, including fly-leaf note ' G A E Potter, Dunraven, 38 Parkstone Road, Poole, Dorset' (1 vol) 1920 B5 MINUTES B5/1 Minute book for Lone Girl Guides, Dorset with pasted in annual reports 1965-1968 and a newspaper cutting (1 vol) 1964-1970 B5/2 Articles on the East Dorset divisional meeting by Miss C C Mount-Batten, notices and appointments (3 docs) 1925 C5 MEMBERS C5/1 Packs C5/1/1 Photograph of a brownie pack (1 doc) n.d.[ 1920s] C5/1/2 Photograph of five members of a girl guide company (ldoc) n.d.[1920s] C5/1/3 Photograph of a girl guide company on a trip (ldoc) n.d.[1920s] C5/1/4 Group photograph of 7th Parkstone company and pack and ranger patrol with a key to names (2 docs) 1928 D.1383 DORSE T GUD3E ASSOCIATIO N C5 MEMBER S C5/2 Individuals C5/2/1 Girl guide diaries, written by the same person (?), with entries for each day,
    [Show full text]
  • Streams, Ditches and Wetlands in the Chichester District. by Dr
    Streams, Ditches and Wetlands in the Chichester District. By Dr. Carolyn Cobbold, BSc Mech Eng., FRSA Richard C J Pratt, BA(Hons), PGCE, MSc (Arch), FRGS Despite the ‘duty of cooperation’ set out in the National Planning Policy Framework1, there is mounting evidence that aspects of the failure to deliver actual cooperation have been overlooked in the recent White Paper2. Within the subregion surrounding the Solent, it is increasingly apparent that the development pressures are such that we risk losing sight of the natural features that underscore not only the attractiveness of the area but also the area’s natural health itself. This paper seeks to focus on the aquatic connections which maintain the sub-region’s biological health, connections which are currently threatened by overdevelopment. The waters of this sub-region sustain not only the viability of natural habitat but also the human economy of employment, tourism, recreation, leisure, and livelihoods. All are at risk. The paper is a plea for greater cooperation across the administrative boundaries of specifically the eastern Solent area. The paper is divided in the following way. 1. Highlands and Lowlands in our estimation of worth 2. The Flow of Water from Downs to Sea 3. Wetlands and Their Global Significance 4. Farmland and Fishing 5. 2011-2013: Medmerry Realignment Scheme 6. The Protection and Enhancement of Natural Capital in The Land ‘In Between’ 7. The Challenge to Species in The District’s Wildlife Corridors 8. Water Quality 9. Habitat Protection and Enhancement at the Sub-Regional Level 10. The policy restraints on the destruction of natural capital 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner Deposits Register
    Register of Landowner Deposits under Highways Act 1980 and Commons Act 2006 The first part of this register contains entries for all CA16 combined deposits received since 1st October 2013, and these all have scanned copies of the deposits attached. The second part of the register lists entries for deposits made before 1st October 2013, all made under section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980. There are a large number of these, and the only details given here currently are the name of the land, the parish and the date of the deposit. We will be adding fuller details and scanned documents to these entries over time. List of deposits made - last update 12 January 2017 CA16 Combined Deposits Deposit Reference: 44 - Land at Froyle (The Mrs Bootle-Wilbrahams Will Trust) Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/countryside/Deposit44-Bootle-WilbrahamsTrustLand-Froyle-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Crispin Mahony of Savills on behalf of The Parish: Froyle Mrs Bootle-WilbrahamWill Trust, c/o Savills (UK) Froyle Jewry Chambers,44 Jewry Street, Winchester Alton Hampshire Hampshire SO23 8RW GU34 4DD Date of Statement: 14/11/2016 Grid Reference: 733.416 Deposit Reference: 98 - Tower Hill, Dummer Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/rightsofway/Deposit98-LandatTowerHill-Dummer-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Jamie Adams & Madeline Hutton Parish: Dummer 65 Elm Bank Gardens, Up Street Barnes, Dummer London Basingstoke SW13 0NX RG25 2AL Date of Statement: 27/08/2014 Grid Reference: 583. 458 Deposit Reference:
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Erosion in Cape Cod, Massachusetts: Finding Sustainable Solutions Michael D
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Student Showcase Sustainable UMass 2015 Coastal Erosion in Cape Cod, Massachusetts: Finding Sustainable Solutions Michael D. Roberts University of Massachusetts - Amherst, [email protected] Lauren Bullard University of Massachusetts - Amherst Shaunna Aflague University of Massachusetts - Amherst Kelsi Sleet University of Massachusetts - Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/ sustainableumass_studentshowcase Part of the Environmental Policy Commons, and the Environmental Studies Commons Roberts, Michael D.; Bullard, Lauren; Aflague, Shaunna; and Sleet, Kelsi, "Coastal Erosion in Cape Cod, Massachusetts: indF ing Sustainable Solutions" (2015). Student Showcase. 6. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/sustainableumass_studentshowcase/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sustainable UMass at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Showcase by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Coastal Erosion in Cape Cod 1 Coastal Erosion in Cape Cod, Massachusetts: Finding Sustainable Solutions Michael Roberts, Lauren Bullard, Shaunna Aflague, and Kelsi Sleet NRC 576 Water Resources Management and Policy Fall 2014 Coastal Erosion in Cape Cod 2 ABSTRACT The Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (CZM) and the Cape Cod Planning Commission have identified coastal erosion, flooding, and shoreline change as the number one risk affecting the heavily populated 1,068 square kilometers that constitute Cape Cod (CZM, 2013 and Cape Cod Commission 2010). This paper investigates natural and anthropogenic causes for coastal erosion and their relationship with established social and economic systems. Sea level rise, climate change, and other anthropogenic changes increase the rate of coastal erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • River Restoration and Chalk Streams
    River Restoration and Chalk Streams Monday 22nd – Tuesday 23rd January 2001 University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB Organised by the River Restoration Centre in partnership with University of Hertfordshire Environment Agency, Thames Region Report compiled by: Vyv Wood-Gee Countryside Management Consultant Scabgill, Braehead, Lanark ML11 8HA Tel: 01555 870530 Fax: 01555 870050 E-mail: [email protected] Mobile: 07711 307980 ____________________________________________________________________________ River Restoration and Chalk Streams Page 1 Seminar Proceedings CONTENTS Page no. Introduction 3 Discussion Session 1: Flow Restoration 4 Discussion Session 2: Habitat Restoration 7 Discussion Session 3: Scheme Selection 9 Discussion Session 4: Post Project Appraisal 15 Discussion Session 5: Project Practicalities 17 Discussion Session 6: BAPs, Research and Development 21 Discussion Session 7: Resource Management 23 Discussion Session 8: Chalk streams and wetlands 25 Discussion Session 9: Conclusions and information dissemination 27 Site visit notes 29 Appendix I: Delegate list 35 Appendix II: Feedback 36 Appendix III: RRC Project Information Pro-forma 38 Appendix IV: Project summaries and contact details – listed 41 alphabetically by project name. ____________________________________________________________________________ River Restoration and Chalk Streams Page 2 Seminar Proceedings INTRODUCTION Workshop Objectives · To facilitate and encourage interchange of information, views and experiences between people working with projects and programmes with strong links to chalk streams and activities or research that affect this environment. · To improve the knowledge base on the practicalities and associated benefits of chalk stream restoration work in order to make future investments more cost effective. Participants The workshop was specifically targeted at individuals and organisations whose activities, research or interests include a specific practical focus on chalk streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Millennium Chalk Streams Fly Trends Study
    EA-South West/0fe2 s REPORT ON THE MILLENNIUM CHALK STREAMS FLY TRENDS STUDY A survey carried out in 2000 among 365 chalk stream fly fishermen, fishery owners, club secretaries and river keepers Subject: trends in aquatic fly abundance over recent decades and immediate past years, seen through the eyes of those constantly on the banks of, and caring for, the South country chalk rivers. Prepared by: Allan Frake, Environment Agency Peter Hayes, FMRS, Wiltshire Fishery Association with data available to all contributory associations and clubs. E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y WILTSHIRE FISHFRY ASSOCIATION I Report on the Millennium Chalk Streams Fly Trends Study Published by: Environment Agency Manley House Kestrel Way Exeter EX2 7LQ Tel: 01392 444000 Fax: 01392 444238 ISBN 1 85 705759 7 © Environment Agency 2001 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the Environment Agency. En v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE SOUTH WEST REGION Manley House, Kestrel Way. Exeter EX2 7LQ SW-12/01 -E-1.5k-BG|W Errt-^o-t-Hv k Io i - i Report on the Millennium Chalk Streams Fly Trends Study I CONTENTS Management Summary Falling fly numbers Introduction and Objectives Methodology Sampling method, respondent qualifications and sample achieved Observational coverage Internal tests for bias, and robustness of data Questionnaire design
    [Show full text]
  • Moreton, Woodsford and Crossways with Tincleton Benefice Profile 2020
    MORETON, WOODSFORD AND CROSSWAYS WITH TINCLETON BENEFICE PROFILE 2020 Benefice Profile - Crossways docx final 2020 Page 1 Contents 1. Introduction to the Profile by the Bishop of Sherborne 3 2. General Description of the Benefice 4 3. What we are looking for in our new Rector 5 4. A Snapshot of the Benefice 6 5 The Churches in our Benefice 7 5.1 St. Nicholas, Moreton 7 5.2 St. John the Baptist, Woodsford 8 5.3. St. Aldhelm, Crossways 9 5.4. St. John the Evangelist, Tincleton 10 6. School Link 11 7. The Rectory and Local Area 12 8. The Dorchester Deanery 13 9. What we can offer You 14 Benefice Profile - Crossways docx final 2020 Page 2 1. Introduction to the Profile by the Bishop of Sherborne In Dorset we have been working hard to make rural ministry both a joy and a delight. In recent years significant changes have been made in the way clergy are supported and encouraged, leading to a greater sense of collegiality in our rural and our urban areas. The Dorchester Deanery, in which the Benefice is situated, seeks to be a supportive place bringing together the rural clergy with those in the County Town. There will be a warm welcome amongst this clergy grouping for whoever comes to this Benefice. The parishes here enjoy beautiful rural countryside yet are within easy reach of Dorchester. Whilst some of these parishes remain as they have been for hundreds of years, and contain some exquisite churches, Crossways, in particular, is an expanding village aimed at attracting a mixed population, including a large number of families, and the newly built church here, adjacent to the school, creates a significant opportunity for the church to open its doors to minister to all those who live in that community.
    [Show full text]