Durable Eucalypt Forests – a Multi-Regional Opportunity For
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Eucalyptus 2018 17-21 September 2018, Le Corum, Montpellier - France
Eucalyptus 2018 17-21 September 2018, Le Corum, Montpellier - France Eucalyptus 2018 Managing Eucalyptus plantations under global changes Abstracts Book Foreword Eucalyptus trees cover about 20 million hectares in more than 90 countries around the world with major centers in Brazil (5.7 m ha), India (3.9 m ha) and China (4.5 m ha). Eucalypts are widely grown in commercial plantations to produce raw material for the industry (pulp and paper, charcoal, sawn timber, wood panels) but also in small woodlots for the production of firewood and charcoal for domestic uses. The considerable expansion of these plantations in recent decades reflects major competitive advantages of eucalypts relative to other tree species in terms of productivity, tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses, wood quality for a wide variety of uses and ability to be managed in coppice. However, the requirements in water and nutrients of eucalypt trees are high to reach high biomass productions and the environmental impact of the silviculture is still a matter of debate. In a context of global changes with more frequent drought events, temperature rise and rapid expansion of pests and diseases, the sustainability of eucalypt plantations is of concern in many regions. Interdisciplinary research is urgently needed to improve the adaptation of eucalypt plantations to global changes. Cirad and I-Site MUSE organize an international conference under the auspices of IUFRO (Division 2.08.03 Improvement and culture of eucalypts and Division 1.02.01 Ecology and silviculture of plantation forests in the tropics) to present recent advances likely to improve the management of eucalypt plantations in tropical, sub-tropical and Mediterranean regions. -
East Gippsland, Victoria
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
The Performance of Eucalyptus Species in Hill Country
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. THE PERFORMANCE OF EUCALYPTUS SPECIES IN HILL COUNTRY A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Plant Science at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. J ames Peter Millner 2006 Abstract Eucalyptus species, particularly stringybarks, which produce hard, durable wood are potentially useful in New Zealand, but most species are site sensitive. Twelve species (E. agglomerata, E. baxteri, E. botryoides, E. cladocalyx, E. globoidea, E. microcorys, E. muelleriana, E. nitens, E. obliqua, E. pilularis, E. regnans and E. sa ligna) were compared on four hill country microsites; upper and lower slope on sunny and shady aspects. Assessments included survival, foliar macro-nutrients, diameter at breast height (DBH), height, stem form, basic wood density and health to age 5 years. Site monitoring included solar radiation, temperature, rainfall and exposure. Foliar nutrients were strongly influenced by species and moderately influenced by microsite. Inter-nutrient and nutrient-growth correlations were identified and discussed. Subgeneric differences in nutrient profile were analysed with the aid of principal components analysis. Solar radiation and temperature were seasonal on both aspects but higher on the sunny face than the shady. Aspect differences were moderate, being greatest in the winter and least in the summer. A strongly seasonal growth pattern resulted, maximum DBH and height increments occurring in the spring and summer respectively. -
Heartwood Formation and the Chemical Basis of Natural Durability
Heartwood formation and the chemical basis of natural durability in Eucalyptus bosistoana A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Forestry By Gayatri Mishra School of Forestry University of Canterbury Senior supervisor: Dr. Clemens Altaner School of Forestry, University of Canterbury Co-Supervisor: Dr. Ashley Garrill Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury Associate Supervisor: Dr. David Collings School of Environmental & Life Sciences University of Newcastle Acknowledgements At the outset, I express my deep sense of gratitude and appreciation to my principal supervisor, Dr. Clemens M. Altaner, School of Forestry, University of Canterbury for providing me an opportunity to work in this project. Without his ceaseless supervision, support, motivation and robust knowledge base this task would not have been completed. His guidance has helped me immensely in my research and writing the thesis till its logical end. Besides, I feel extremely fortunate to work with my associate supervisor, Dr. David Collings and Co- supervisor, Dr. Ashley Garrill too. Microscopy being a major part of my research, I feel deeply indebted to Dr. David Collings for introducing me into the realms of advanced microscopic skills coupled with his constant guidance. Even after his leaving the University in the meanwhile, he was considerate enough to bridge the gap through his timely communications via emails or video conversations. His unique concepts and expertise generated my strong interest in microscopy. I also thank Dr. Ashley Garrill for providing me with necessary lab facilities to perform bioactivity tests with fungi. His expertise has been a great source of support to my bioactivity experiments. -
07 Shelbourne
256 New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 32(2) PERFORMANCE TO AGE 22 YEARS OF 49 EUCALYPTS IN THE WAIRARAPA DISTRICT, NEW ZEALAND, AND REVIEW OF RESULTS FROM OTHER TRIALS C. J. A. SHELBOURNE, New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua, New Zealand B. T. BULLOCH, P. O. Box 7097, Palmerston North, New Zealand C. B. LOW and R. M. McCONNOCHIE New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua, New Zealand (Received for publication 30 April 2002; revision 24 September 2002) ABSTRACT Trials of 49 eucalypt species were established in 1979 in the Wairarapa district at Kahuiti and Pakaraka, originally to test species for their potential to stabilise erodable land for pastoral use. Trials were planted in a randomised complete block design with five replications of four-tree row plots of each seedlot (paired rows of four trees of species with only a single seedlot). The species included Corymbia maculata (Hook.)K.D.Hill & L.A.S.Johnson, E. cladocalyx F.Muell., four stringybarks (including E. muelleriana A.W.Howitt and E. globoidea Blakely), nine ashes (including E. fastigata Deane & Maiden, E. regnans F.Muell., and E. obliqua L’Herit), seven peppermints, and 18 gums (including E. nitens (Deane & Maiden) Maiden). Because of heavy thinning at Pakaraka, the Kahuiti trial only was assessed at age 22 years on production forestry criteria — diameter at breast height (dbh), stem straightness, malformation, crown health, and number of potential 5-m sawlogs per tree The 12 best-grown species for mean tree dbh at Kahuiti, were ranked: E. globoidea, E. muelleriana (stringybarks), E. -
Lowland Grassy Woodland in the South East Corner Bioregion
Lowland Grassy Woodland in the South East Corner Bioregion Introduction These guidelines provide background information to assist landholders to identify remnants of Lowland Grassy Woodland in the South East Corner Bioregion (known here as Lowland Grassy Woodland). For more detailed information refer to the NSW Scientific Committee’s Final Determination at www.threatenedspecies.environment.nsw.gov.au/tsprofile/profile.aspx?id=20070 What is an endangered ecological community? An ecological community is a unique and naturally occurring assemblage of plants and animals. The presence of an ecological community can be determined by factors such as soil type, position in the landscape, climate and water availability, all of which influence species composition. An endangered ecological community (EEC) is an ecological community listed under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 as being at risk of extinction unless threats affecting these areas are managed and reduced. What is Lowland Grassy Woodland? Lowland Grassy Woodland is an open forest or woodland often with a layer of scattered small trees, an open shrub layer and a mostly continuous grassy ground layer. Some examples may reach a height of 40 m, but many regrowth stands may only be 10 m tall. It is associated with rainshadow areas of the south coast and hinterland of New South Wales which receive less rainfall than the more elevated surrounding areas. It typically occurs in undulating terrain up to 500 m elevation on granitic substrates (e.g. adamellites, granites, granodiorites, gabbros, etc.) but may also occur on locally steep sites and on acid volcanic, alluvial and fine-grained sedimentary substrates. -
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Whitehorse Urban Biodiversity Strategy
WHITEHORSE URBAN BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY For Council managed open space, streetscapes and community facilities Whitehorse Urban Biodiversity Strategy for Council Managed Open Space, Streetscapes and Community Facilities Contents Acknowledgements 4 9.1.11 Ground Level Habitat/Coarse Woody 24 Executive Summary 5 Material Fuel Reduction Guidelines Glossary Of Terms 6 9.1.12 Expand the Existing Infill Tree Planting 24 Program to Improve Canopy Cover 1 Introduction 6 9.1.13 Biodiversity Research Liaison 24 Committee 2 What Is Biodiversity 8 2.1 Defining “Whitehorse Biodiversity” 8 9.2 New Biodiversity Actions: One-Off 25 2.2 What are Public Whitehorse 8 Commitments Biodiversity Assets? 9.2.1 Development of An Inventory of 25 2.3 Water and Biodiversity 8 Whitehorse Biodiversity Assets 3 Statutory Context 13 10 9.2.2 List of “Biodiversity Hotspots” 25 3.1 Whitehorse City Council Policies 10 9.2.3 Development of A Biodiversity 26 and Strategies Corridors Plan 9.2.4 Identify Potential “No Mow” Areas 26 4 The Whitehorse Landscape and Biodiversity 10 9.2.5 Vegetation Management Plans For 26 4.1 Aboriginal History of Whitehorse 10 Large Tracts Of Land With 4.2 Natural Landscape of Whitehorse 10 Alternative Uses 4.3 The Remaining Natural Landscape 12 9.2.6 Biodiversity Engagement – Logos 26 of Whitehorse and Signage 4.4 The Suburban Whitehorse 14 9.2.7 Development Of Monitoring 27 Landscape Program 4.5 What Biodiversity is Missing 14 9.2.8 Community Reporting and Data 27 From Whitehorse Gathering 4.6 What Whitehorse Biodiversity Remains 15 9.2.9 Environmental -
D.Nicolle, Classification of the Eucalypts (Angophora, Corymbia and Eucalyptus) | 2
Taxonomy Genus (common name, if any) Subgenus (common name, if any) Section (common name, if any) Series (common name, if any) Subseries (common name, if any) Species (common name, if any) Subspecies (common name, if any) ? = Dubious or poorly-understood taxon requiring further investigation [ ] = Hybrid or intergrade taxon (only recently-described and well-known hybrid names are listed) ms = Unpublished manuscript name Natural distribution (states listed in order from most to least common) WA Western Australia NT Northern Territory SA South Australia Qld Queensland NSW New South Wales Vic Victoria Tas Tasmania PNG Papua New Guinea (including New Britain) Indo Indonesia TL Timor-Leste Phil Philippines ? = Dubious or unverified records Research O Observed in the wild by D.Nicolle. C Herbarium specimens Collected in wild by D.Nicolle. G(#) Growing at Currency Creek Arboretum (number of different populations grown). G(#)m Reproductively mature at Currency Creek Arboretum. – (#) Has been grown at CCA, but the taxon is no longer alive. – (#)m At least one population has been grown to maturity at CCA, but the taxon is no longer alive. Synonyms (commonly-known and recently-named synonyms only) Taxon name ? = Indicates possible synonym/dubious taxon D.Nicolle, Classification of the eucalypts (Angophora, Corymbia and Eucalyptus) | 2 Angophora (apples) E. subg. Angophora ser. ‘Costatitae’ ms (smooth-barked apples) A. subser. Costatitae, E. ser. Costatitae Angophora costata subsp. euryphylla (Wollemi apple) NSW O C G(2)m A. euryphylla, E. euryphylla subsp. costata (smooth-barked apple, rusty gum) NSW,Qld O C G(2)m E. apocynifolia Angophora leiocarpa (smooth-barked apple) Qld,NSW O C G(1) A. -
Indigenous Plants of Greater Taree
Indigenous Plants of Greater Taree Copyright & Acknowledgements Images are all copyright of Andrew Paget (1981-) and are provided for use in this booklet on the basis that this publication is not for commercial sale. Thanks to all the community groups and individuals who commented on drafts of this booklet, and to the Hunter-Central Rivers Catchment Management Authority who funded the production of this booklet through the Australian Natural Heritage Trust. Third edition published in 2010 by Greater Taree City Council‟s Strategic Planning Department. NOTE: This booklet includes only a small range of the 1800 plants known to be indigenous to the Greater Taree Local Government Area. It provides information and photos on 127 species, which are more commonly used in horticulture, attractive for cultivation and widespread across the region. The summary table in the rear of the booklet provides further information on these species and an additional 198 species, including species suitable for bushland revegetation and others less common to the region. Page 1 Indigenous Plants of Greater Taree Contents Introduction ..................................................................... p3 What are Indigenous Plants? ........................................... P4 Why use Indigenous Plants? ........................................... p4 Genetic Purity Issues ....................................................... p5 Which plants are Suitable for Cultivation? ...................... p6 Where do you obtain Indigenous Plants? ........................ -
Thèse 11.11.19
THESE PRESENTEE ET PUBLIQUEMENT SOUTENUE DEVANT LA FACULTE DE PHARMACIE DE MARSEILLE LE LUNDI 25 NOVEMBRE 2019 PAR MME ERAU Pauline Né(e) le 6 octobre 1989 à Avignon EN VUE D’OBTENIR LE DIPLOME D’ETAT DE DOCTEUR EN PHARMACIE L’EUCALYPTUS : BOTANIQUE, COMPOSITION CHIMIQUE, UTILISATION THÉRAPEUTIQUE ET CONSEIL À L’OFFICINE JURY : Président : Pr OLLIVIER Evelyne, Professeur en Pharmacognosie, Ethnopharmacologie et Homéopathie Membres : Dr BAGHDIKIAN Béatrice, Maitre de conférences en Pharmacognosie, Ethnopharmacologie et Homéopathie M VENTRE Mathieu , Pharmacien d’officine 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Remerciements Je remercie toutes les personnes qui m’ont aidé pendant l’élabo ration de ma thèse et plus particulièrement les personnes qui font partie du jury de soutenance : - Ma directrice de thèse Madame Badghdikian Béatrice pour son intérêt ses conseils durant la rédaction et la correction de ma thèse, - Madame Ollivier Evelyne, Professeur en Pharmacognosie, Ethnopharmacologie et Homéopathie d’av oir accepté de présider ce jury, - Monsieur Ventre Mathieu pour sa patience après toutes ces années et la confiance que vous m’accordez. 9 Je remercie également de manière plus personnelle toutes les personnes qui m’ont entourée ces dernières années : - Sylvain, qui a tout fait pour m’aider, qui m’a soutenu et surtout supporté dans tout ce que j’ai entrepris, - Alexandre, qui a su, à sa manière, patienter pendant les longues heures de relecture de ce document, - Mes p arents et mes sœurs pour leur soutien depuis toujours , - Un grand merci aussi à toute l’équipe de la pharmacie Ventre : Mme Ventre, Virginie et (par ordre alphabétique) Céline, Jennifer, Marie, Marion, Maryline, Perrine et Virginie qui me supportent au quotidien, - Je remercie toutes les personnes avec qui j’ai partagé mes études et que je suis ravie de revoir après toutes ces années : Jean-Luc, Paul, Elsa, Loïc, Michael, Marion… 10 « L’Université n’entend donner aucune approbat ion, ni improbation aux opinions émises dans les thèses. -
Durable Eucalypt Forests – a Multi-Regional Opportunity for Investment in New Zealand Drylands
Specialty woods Durable eucalypt forests – a multi-regional opportunity for investment in New Zealand drylands Paul Millen, Shaf van Ballekom, Clemens Altaner, Luis Apiolaza, Euan Mason, Ruth McConnochie, Justin Morgenroth and Tara Murray Abstract Introduction We believe our vision for the establishment The New Zealand Dryland Forests Initiative of a durable eucalypt plantation estate is a unique (NZDFI) was established in 2008 as a collaborative tree opportunity to add value to New Zealand’s current breeding and forestry research project. The NZDFI’s forest industry. With our elite breeding populations and aim is to select and improve drought-tolerant eucalypts branding strategy we have ‘first mover’ advantage to that produce high-quality naturally ground-durable make this a reality by forest growers planting relatively hardwood. The NZDFI vision is for New Zealand to be a low-value, marginal pastoral dryland to produce high- world leader in breeding ground-durable eucalypts, and value timber. Our aim is that New Zealand will compete to be home to a valuable sustainable hardwood industry on innovation and excellence, rather than price, with based on 100,000 ha of eucalypt forests by 2050. our strategy underpinned by the increasing scarcity of tropical hardwoods and environmental constraints Markets for naturally ground-durable wood exist limiting their ongoing supply. in New Zealand’s agricultural, transport and energy E. quadrangulata, Wairarapa, age four years NZ Journal of Forestry, May 2018, Vol. 63, No. 1 11 Specialty woods A well-established NZDFI trial in Marlborough sectors. There is also potential for high-value specialty and employment could be generated through local wood products for export to international markets processing to produce high-value export products that (Millen, 2009).