Mollusca, Bivalvia) Бассейна Реки Таз (Западная Сибирь)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mollusca, Bivalvia) Бассейна Реки Таз (Западная Сибирь) Ruthenica, 201, vol. 30, No. 1: 13-32. © Ruthenica, 2020 Published online 11.02.2020 http: ruthenica.net Материалы к фауне двустворчатых моллюсков (Mollusca, Bivalvia) бассейна реки Таз (Западная Сибирь) Е.С. БАБУШКИН 1, 2, 3 1Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, Лаборатория макроэкологии и биогеографии беспозвоночных. 199034, Санкт-Петербург, Университетская набережная, 7–9; РОССИЯ. E-mail: [email protected] 2Сургутский государственный университет. 628403, Сургут, пр. Ленина, 1; РОССИЯ. 3Омский государственный педагогический университет. 644099, Омск, набережная Тухачевского, 14; РОССИЯ. РЕЗЮМЕ. По результатам изучения собственных сборов автора фауна пресноводных двустворчатых моллюсков (Mollusca, Bivalvia) бассейна р. Таз включает 70 видов из 6 родов, 4 подсемейств и 2 семейств. Приведен аннотированный список видов двустворчатых моллюсков бассейна р. Таз. Анно- тации видов содержат сведения об их ареале, находках в Западной Сибири и бассейне Таза, биономике и относительном обилии в водоемах и водотоках рассматриваемого бассейна. Впервые для района исследований зарегистрировано 45 видов. Распределение видов по представленности в составе коллек- ции и по встречаемости крайне неравномерное, видовое богатство большинства малакоценозов невы- сокое. Редкими в составе коллекции являются 22 вида. Наибольшее видовое богатство зарегистрирова- но в придаточных водоемах рек, реках и ручьях, наименьшее – во временных водоемах. В фауне двустворчатых моллюсков Таза преобладают широкораспространенные (космополитные, голаркти- ческие, палеарктические) и европейско-западносибирские виды. Фауна Sphaeriinae бассейна р. Таз в таксономическом отношении обособлена от локальных фаун бассейнов рек других зоогеографичес- ких провинций Западной Сибири и по своему составу ближе к малакофауне Нижнеенисейской про- винции (в соответствии с районированием Я.И. Старобогатова [1986]). Materials on the fauna of bivalve mollusks the lowest – in temporary habitats. The core of the (Mollusca, Bivalvia) of the Taz river basin (Western fauna is constituted by species with broadest range Siberia) (cosmopolitan, trans-Holarctic, trans-Palearctic) as well as by taxa with European-Siberian type of distribution. 1, 2, 3 From the taxonomic point of view, the bivalve fauna of E.S. BABUSHKIN the Taz basin is relatively separated from the faunas of 1Laboratory of Macroecology and Biogeography of Inverte- other river basins of Western Siberia and is more similar brates, Saint-Petersburg State Universityб 7–9 Univer- to the fauna of the Lower Yenisean zoogeographic sitetskaya emb., Saint-Petersburg, 199034; RUSSIA. E-mail: province (sensu Starobogatov [1986]). [email protected] 2Surgut State University. 1 Lenina avenue, Surgut, Tyumen Region, 628403; RUSSIA Введение 3Omsk State Pedagogical University. 14 Tukhachevskogo emb., Omsk, 644099; RUSSIA Пресноводная малакофауна севера Западной ABSTRACT. Based on a study of samples collected by Сибири привлекала внимание исследователей уже the author, 70 species of freshwater bivalves belonging более полутора сотен лет назад. Самые ранние to 6 genera and 2 families are recorded for the Taz River сборы моллюсков были осуществлены участни- basin (north of Western Siberia). An annotated list of ками нескольких комплексных экспедиций и bivalves of the Taz basin is provided, with data on впоследствии переданы на обработку известным species’ range, their findings in Western Siberia and малакологам того времени [Vinarski, 2010]. По- within the studied area. Some information about лученные данные о малакофауне севера Запад- bionomics and abundance of bivalves are given. 45 ной Сибири вошли в первые монографии и ста- species are for the first time registered in this basin. Most studied molluscan communities are characterized тьи, посвященные сибирским моллюскам [Mid- by low species richness; the distribution of species by dendorff, 1851; Westerlund, 1877, 1887, 1897]. their occurrence was extremely uneven. 22 species are Со временем специальные малакологические characterized as rare. The highest species richness of работы, основанные на материалах экспедицион- bivalves was found in river channels, rivers and brooks; ных сборов [Middendorff, 1851; Westerlund, 1877, 14 Е.С. Бабушкин 1897; Lindholm, 1919], уступили место гидроби- большей части бассейна Таза остается не изу- ологическим исследованиям, проводившимся в ченной. интересах рыбного хозяйства и промысла [Maslov, Наиболее актуальные и полные данные о фау- 1937; Joffe, 1947; Leshchinskaya, 1962]. Сведе- не Sphaeriidae нижней части бассейна р. Таз и ния о моллюсках в них, как правило, весьма прилегающих районов привел В.Н. Долгин скудны. Во второй половине 20 в. вновь появи- [Dolgin, 2001], в своей докторской диссертации лись публикации, специально посвященные мол- он указал 33 вида. Представители Unionidae для люскам [Khokhutkin, 1966; Drozdov, 1967; Yukh- севера Западной Сибири в работе не отмечены. В neva, 1969; Dolgin, Johansen, 1973]. Результа- общегидробиологической статье Б.Ф. Свириден- ты предыдущих и собственных исследований ко с соавторами [Sviridenko et al., 2010] для пресноводных моллюсков севера Сибири были бассейна р. Таз впервые были указаны два вида обобщены В.Н. Долгиным в его кандидатской семейства Unionidae: Colletopterum rostratum [Dolgin, 1974] и докторской [Dolgin, 2001] дис- (Rossmaessler, 1836) и C. anatinum (Linnaeus, сертациях. 1758). Чуть позже вышла в свет статья [Dolgin, На сегодняшний день большинство имеющих- Sviridenko, 2011], специально посвященная мол- ся данных о пресноводной малакофауне севера люскам. К сожалению, в этой публикации спи- Западной Сибири основано на материалах, со- сок видов был приведен сразу для двух крупных бранных в бассейне нижней Оби [Dolgin, 1974, речных бассейнов (Пур и Таз) без разбивки по 2001]. Меньше известно о моллюсках других ним, а также без информации о количестве со- районов – полуостровов Гыданский, Тазовский, бранного материала и месте его хранения. Все Ямал, Обской и Тазовской губ, бассейнов их это затрудняет использование приведенных све- притоков, не входящих в бассейн Оби [Dolgin, дений в целях биогеографического анализа и 1974, 2001; Frolov, Lyubin, 2003; Sviridenko et сравнения видового состава фауны с данными о al., 2010; Dolgin, Sviridenko, 2011; Bespalaya et других речных бассейнах Сибири. al., 2019]. Одной из причин недостаточной изученности Цель данной работы – обзор и характеристика фауны двустворчатых моллюсков севера Запад- фауны двустворчатых моллюсков (Mollusca, ной Сибири является отсутствие единства в под- Bivalvia) бассейна р. Таз – рассмотрение слож- ходе к построению системы семейства Sphaeriidae ной и недостаточно изученной группы на основа- [Korniushin, 2001; 2002; Graf, 2007; Vinarski, нии собственных материалов и литературных дан- Kantor, 2016; Lee, 2019], это приводит к тому, что ных в свете современных представлений о так- результаты, полученные в рамках разных подхо- сономии, филогении и номенклатуре этих живот- дов, часто оказываются несопоставимыми. Од- ных [Bouchet, Rocroi, 2010; Vinarski, Kantor, 2016; нако спорные методологические вопросы я ос- Bogatov et al., 2018; Klishko et al., 2018]. тавляю за рамками настоящей публикации, а про- Река Таз берет начало в северо-восточной блему сопоставимости результатов надеюсь хотя части Сибирских Увалов. Длина реки 1401 км, бы частично сгладить, используя т.н. альтерна- площадь водосбора 150 000 км2. Большая часть тивный подход к систематике пресноводных мол- речного бассейна находится в таежной зоне, мень- люсков бывшего СССР [Vinarski, Kramarenko, шая – в лесотундре и тундре. Характерной осо- 2015; Vinarski, Kantor, 2016]. бенностью бассейна является обилие болот и не- Бассейн р. Таз расположен на стыке зоогеог- больших озер в долинах рек и отсутствие их на рафических провинций и даже подобластей водоразделах. Значительная часть бассейна нахо- [Starobogatov, 1970, 1986; Dolgin, 2001]. Здесь дится в зоне многолетней мерзлоты. Река, силь- возможны интересные фаунистические находки, но меандрируя, медленно течет в широкой доли- уточняющие имеющиеся сведения о распростра- не, русло ее часто разветвляется на рукава. Пе- нении отдельных видов. Изучение малакофауны ред впадением в Тазовскую губу она образует этого речного бассейна важно для понимания дельту [Richter, 1963; Vodogretski, 1973; State закономерностей распространения и распределе- Water Registry, 2009]. ния видов, путей и механизмов распространения, Имеющиеся сведения о малакофауне бассей- прогнозов вселения чужеродных видов и охра- на р. Таз фактически ограничены данными, со- ны нативной фауны. В бассейне Таза расположен бранными в устьевой зоне реки и ее нижнем Верхне-Тазовский государственный природный течении [Drozdov, 1967; Dolgin, Johansen, 1973; заповедник, для территории которого отсутству- Dolgin, 1974, 2001; Sviridenko et al., 2010; Dolgin, ют данные о пресноводных моллюсках. В част- Sviridenko, 2011]. Ряд работ посвящен моллюс- ности, информация о моллюсках этого бассейна кам п-ова Тазовский [Khokhutkin, 1966; Dolgin, отсутствует в Красных книгах Ямало-Ненецкого Johansen, 1973; Dolgin, 1974, 2001], некоторые автономного округа [Ektova, Zamyatin, 2010] и авторы также относят эти данные к бассейну р. Тюменской области [Petrova, 2004]. Такое поло- Таз. Таким образом, пресноводная малакофауна жение не отражает благополучие группы в дан- К фауне двустворчатых моллюсков бассейна р. Таз 15 РИС 1. Карта малакологических сборов экспедиции в бассейн р. Таз, 2015 г. FIG 1. Map of sampling sites in the Taz river basin, 2015. ном регионе, оно свидетельствует о её слабой
Recommended publications
  • Clams , Mussels
    KEYS TO THE FRESHWATER MS-Q-S MASTER COPY MACROINVERTEBRATES OF MASSACHUSETTS C --=;...-~---=-~-- /'""-,-----F NO. 1 : MOLLUSCA PELECYPODA ( Clams , Mussels ) Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering DIVISION of WATER POLLUTION CONTROL Thomas C. McMahon, Director KEYSTO THE FRESHWATERM.'\CROINVERTEBRATES OF MASSACHUSETTS(No. 1): Mollusca Pelecypoda (clams, mussels) Douglas G. Smith Museum of zoology University of Massachusetts Amherst, Massachusetts and Museum of Comparative zoology Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts In Cooperation With The Ccmnonwealth of Massachusetts Technical Services Branch Department Environmental Quality Engineering Division of water Pollution Control Westborough, Massachusetts December, 1986 PUBLICATION: #14,676-56-300-12-86-CR Approved by the state Purchasing Agent TABLEOF CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE••• iii INTRODUCTION 1 CLASSIFICATIONOF MASSACHUSETTSFRESHWATER BIVALVES 8 HOWTO USE THE KEY . 11 PICTORIALKEY TO MASSACHUSETTSUNIONACEANS 15 GENERALKEY TO THE UNIONACEAAND CORBULACEAOF MASSACHUSETTS••• 17 DISTRIBUTIONOF MASSACHUSETTSE'RESI-JfNATER BIVALVES 42 GLOSSARYOF TERMSUSED IN KEY 46 BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 -ii- PREFACE The present work, concerning the identification of freshwater bivalve mollusks occurring in Massachusetts, represents the first of hopefully a series of guides dealing with the identification of benthic macroscopic invertebrates inhabiting the inland freshwaters of Massachusetts. The purpose of this and succeeding guides or handbooks is to introduce various groups of freshwater invertebrates to persons working in any of several areas of the freshwater ecology of Massachusetts. Although the guides are limited in tl1eir geographic scope to areas within the political boundaries of Massachusetts, many of the organisms treated, and information regarding their ecology and biology, will be applicable to neighboring regions. To increase the usefulness of mis and following guidebooks, complete regional bibliographies of me distribution of included species are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • The Asiatic Clam Corbicula Fluminea (Müller, 1774)
    The Asiatic clam Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) (Bivalvia: Corbiculidae) in Europe R. Araujo, D. Moreno and M. A. Ramos Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2. 28006, Madrid, Spain Abstract. Two populations of Corbicula fluminea were found in the Iberian Península; one in Spain and the other in Portugal. A detailed description in terms of ecology shell morphology and microstructure, morphometrics and anatomy is given for the Spanish population from the Mino River. Lectotypes for Tellina fluminea and T. fluminalis, and a neotype for T. fluviatilis are designated and illustrated. Distribuüon and spread of C. fluminea in Europe are revised. Comparisons among some European populations and the populations from Cantón, China, and the Mino River are made. Results suggest that, except for one doubtful population, all records of Corbicula in Europe are attributable to C. fluminea. Corbicula taxonomy begins in 1774 with Müller who Thus, Talavera and Faustino (1933) {In: Britton and described three species in the genus Tellina Linne, 1758: T. Morton, 1979) placed Corbicula manilensis (Philippi, 1844) fluminalis "in fluvio Asiae Euphrat"; T. fluminea "in arena into synonymy with C. fluminea, Morton (1977) considered fluviali Chinae"; T. fluviatilis "in ilumine emporium Can C. leana to be a júnior synonym of C. fluminea, while C. tón Chinae praeterlabente". Since then, many living species fluviatilis was previously placed into synonymy with C. of Corbicula Mühlfeldt, 1811, have been described in fluminea by Prashad (1929). Moreover, a thorough review by freshwater and estuarine habitáis from Southeast Asia, the Britton and Morton (1979) lead the authors to consider that Indian subcontinent, the Pacific islands, and the easternmost most Asiatic species previously described could be attributed part of Europe and África (McMahon, 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Molluscs of the Dürrenstein Wilderness Area
    Molluscs of the Dürrenstein Wilderness Area S a b i n e F ISCHER & M i c h a e l D UDA Abstract: Research in the Dürrenstein Wilderness Area (DWA) in the southwest of Lower Austria is mainly concerned with the inventory of flora, fauna and habitats, interdisciplinary monitoring and studies on ecological disturbances and process dynamics. During a four-year qualitative study of non-marine molluscs, 96 sites within the DWA and nearby nature reserves were sampled in cooperation with the “Alpine Land Snails Working Group” located at the Natural History Museum of Vienna. Altogether, 84 taxa were recorded (72 land snails, 12 water snails and mussels) including four endemics and seven species listed in the Austrian Red List of Molluscs. A reference collection (empty shells) of molluscs, which is stored at the DWA administration, was created. This project was the first systematic survey of mollusc fauna in the DWA. Further sampling might provide additional information in the future, particularly for Hydrobiidae in springs and caves, where detailed analyses (e.g. anatomical and genetic) are needed. Key words: Wilderness Dürrenstein, Primeval forest, Benign neglect, Non-intervention management, Mollusca, Snails, Alpine endemics. Introduction manifold species living in the wilderness area – many of them “refugees”, whose natural habitats have almost In concordance with the IUCN guidelines, research is disappeared in today’s over-cultivated landscape. mandatory for category I wilderness areas. However, it may not disturb the natural habitats and communities of the nature reserve. Research in the Dürrenstein The Dürrenstein Wilderness Area Wilderness Area (DWA) focuses on providing invento- (DWA) ries of flora and fauna, on interdisciplinary monitoring The Dürrenstein Wilderness Area (DWA) was as well as on ecological disturbances and process dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Ma Aeolake in Alacologi N the Moe Cal Analy
    Faculty of Sciences Department of Geology and Soil Science Research Unit Palaeontology Academic year 2009‐2010 Changes in surface waters: a malacological analysis of a Late Glacial and early Holocene palaeolake in the Moervaartdepression (Belgium). by Lynn Serbruyns Thesis submitted to obtain the degree of Master in Biology. Promotor: Prof. Dr. Jacques Verniers Co‐promotor: Prof. Dr. Dirk Van Damme Faculty of Sciences Department of Geology and Soil Science Research Unit Palaeontology Academic year 2009‐2010 Changes in surface waters: a malacological analysis of a Late Glacial and early Holocene palaeolake in the Moervaartdepression (Belgium). by Lynn Serbruyns Thesis submitted to obtain the degree of Master in Biology. Promotor: Prof. Dr. Jacques Verniers Co‐promotor: Prof. Dr. Dirk Van Damme Acknowledgements0 First of all, I would like to thank my promoter Prof. Jacques Verniers and Prof. Philippe Crombé for providing me with this interesting subject and for giving me the freedom to further extend the analysis beyond the original boundaries. Thanks to my co-promoter Prof. Dirk Van Damme who I could always contact with questions and who provided me with many articles on the subject. I also want to thank Prof. Keppens for giving me the opportunity to perform the isotope analysis at the VUB, even though technology let us down in the end. I would like to thank Koen Verhoeven for sacrificing part of his office and for aiding me with the sampling from the trench. Thanks to Mona Court-Picon for the numerous ways in which she helped me during the making of this thesis and for the nice talks.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Guidelines for Michigan Lakes and Associated Natural Resources
    ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A S STATE OF MICHIGAN P E DNR D M ICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SR38 March 2006 Conservation Guidelines for Michigan Lakes and Associated Natural Resources Richard P. O’Neal and Gregory J. Soulliere www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT 38 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Special Report 38 March 2006 Conservation Guidelines for Michigan Lakes and Associated Natural Resources Richard P. O’Neal and Gregory J. Soulliere MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the State’s natural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act).
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Molluscs
    FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS Photo © Piotr Naskrecki Photo © Steven Buck, Illinois Natural History Survey BIODIVERSITY SAMPLING PROTOCOLS 185 RAPID BIOASSESSMENT METHODS FOR FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS Kevin S. Cummings1, Hugh A. Jones2 and Manuel Lopes-Lima3 Introduction Freshwater molluscs are found worldwide, occurring on all continents except Antarctica. There are approximately 1,200 species of freshwater bivalves, 97% of which belong to eight primary freshwater families: Unionidae, Margaritiferidae, Hyriidae, Mycetopodidae, Iridinidae, and Etheriidae (all Unionoida or freshwater mussels), Sphaeriidae, and Cyrenidae (both Veneroida) (Graf 2013). The world’s freshwater gastropod fauna comprises approximately 4,000 described species (Strong et al. 2008). Many species are globally imperiled and freshwater molluscs are considered to be the most threatened group of animals in the world (Williams et al. 1993; Lydeard et al. 2004; Johnson et al. 2013). Freshwater mussels (unionoids) are an integral component of aquatic ecosystems. Freshwater mussels can comprise >90% of the benthic biomass of rivers and an individual mussel can filter 40 L of water each day (Tankersley & Dimock 1993; Pusch et al. 2001; Strayer 2008). In addition, their shells function as substrate for many organisms including caddisflies, mayflies and other aquatic insects. Unionoids are often described as ecosystem engineers due to the direct and indirect physical effects that they have on freshwater ecosystems (Gutiérrez et al. 2003). Freshwater mussels also provide important direct services to humans, such as water purification, serving as an important prey for several mammals and commercial fishes, and providing a direct source of protein. Given their importance within aquatic ecosystems, the cascading consequences of unionoid declines can be considerable (Haag 2012; Vaughn et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Species Question in Freshwater Malacology: from Linnaeus to the Present Day
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323748481 THE SPECIES QUESTION IN FRESHWATER MALACOLOGY: FROM LINNAEUS TO THE PRESENT DAY Article · March 2018 DOI: 10.12657/folmal.026.005 CITATIONS READS 0 126 1 author: Maxim Vinarski Saint Petersburg State University 134 PUBLICATIONS 664 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Biological diversity and taxonomy of freshwater snails of Central Asia View project Origin of freshwater fauna in Iceland: Cryptic glacial refugia or postglacial founder events? View project All content following this page was uploaded by Maxim Vinarski on 14 March 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Folia Malacol. 26(1): 39–52 https://doi.org/10.12657/folmal.026.005 THE SPECIES QUESTION IN FRESHWATER MALACOLOGY: FROM LINNAEUS TO THE PRESENT DAY1 MAXIM V. VINARSKI Saint-Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, 7/9, 199034 Saint-Petersburg/Omsk State Pedagogical University, 14 Tukhachevskogo Emb., 644099 Omsk, Russian Federation (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT: The history of the species problem as applied to freshwater molluscs, from the beginning of scientific taxonomy to the present day, is outlined. Three main approaches to delineation of species boundaries (intuitive, conceptual, and operational) are discussed, with remarks on their practical usage in freshwater malacology. The central topic of the article is how malacologists changed their views on the essence of species category and the impact of these changes on the taxonomic practice. The opinions of some prominent and prolific workers in the field (Bourguignat, Kobelt, Hubendick, Starobogatov) are analysed as well as the debates around the theoretical foundations and practical results of the ‘Nouvelle École’ of the 19th century and the ‘comparatory’ systematics of the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5
    Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Prepared by: Amy J. Benson, Colette C. Jacono, Pam L. Fuller, Elizabeth R. McKercher, U.S. Geological Survey 7920 NW 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653 and Myriah M. Richerson Johnson Controls World Services, Inc. 7315 North Atlantic Avenue Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 29 February 2004 Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………... ...1 Aquatic Macrophytes ………………………………………………………………….. ... 2 Submersed Plants ………...………………………………………………........... 7 Emergent Plants ………………………………………………………….......... 13 Floating Plants ………………………………………………………………..... 24 Fishes ...…………….…………………………………………………………………..... 29 Invertebrates…………………………………………………………………………...... 56 Mollusks …………………………………………………………………………. 57 Bivalves …………….………………………………………………........ 57 Gastropods ……………………………………………………………... 63 Nudibranchs ………………………………………………………......... 68 Crustaceans …………………………………………………………………..... 69 Amphipods …………………………………………………………….... 69 Cladocerans …………………………………………………………..... 70 Copepods ……………………………………………………………….. 71 Crabs …………………………………………………………………...... 72 Crayfish ………………………………………………………………….. 73 Isopods ………………………………………………………………...... 75 Shrimp ………………………………………………………………….... 75 Amphibians and Reptiles …………………………………………………………….. 76 Amphibians ……………………………………………………………….......... 81 Toads and Frogs
    [Show full text]
  • Pisidium (Euglesa) Tasmanicum to the Rest of This Subgenus Is Uncertain
    Genus Pisidium Pfeiffer, 1821 Subgenus Euglesa Leach in Jenyns, 1832 Diagnostic features Shell small, short oval or quadrangular, moderately convex. Surface irregularly striated. Pores moderately dense. Hinge plate relatively narrow. Cardinal teeth arched or bent. Ligament enclosed. Presiphonal mantle suture elongated. nner radial mantle muscles form five to seven strong bundles. Outer demibranch small, strongly shifted posteriorly. Classification Class Bivalvia Class Bivalvia Infraclass Heteroconchia Cohort Heterodonta Megaorder Neoheterodontei Order Sphaeriida Superfamily Sphaerioidea Family Sphaeriidae Subfamily: Pisidiinae Genus Pisidium Pfeiffer, 1821 Subgenus Euglesa Jenyns, 1832 Type species: Euglesa henslowiana Jenyns, 1832 (= Pisidium personatum Malm, 1855) (also sometimes cited as Tellina pusilla Gmelin, 1791) Original reference: Jenyns, L. (1832). A monograph on the British species of Cyclas and Pisidium. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 4: 289ĕ311. Type locality: Near Cambridge, England. Synonyms: Australpera redale, 1943; Glacipisum redale, 1943 State of taxonomy We follow the latest revision of the group byKorniushin (2000). Biology and ecology n rock and gravel substrate, amongst weed, and in sand and mud. Most frequent in creeks and small rivers. n South Australia and Tasmania it also inhabits springs, peat bogs, lakes and lagoons. Distribution Cosmopolitan. n Australia, the genus is found throughout much of south-eastern Australia, including Tasmania, as well as in Central Australia. Notes The nature of the evolutionary relationship of Pisidium (Euglesa) tasmanicum to the rest of this subgenus is uncertain. Further reading Beesley, P. L., Ross, G. J. B. & Wells, A., Eds. (1998). Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis. Parts A & B. Melbourne, CSRO Publishing. Korniushin, A. V. (2000). Review of the family Sphaeriidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of Australia, with the description of four new species.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W
    Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W. Welter-Schultes Version 1.1 March 2013 Suggested citation: Welter-Schultes, F.W. (2012). Guidelines for the capture and management of digital zoological names information. Version 1.1 released on March 2013. Copenhagen: Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 126 pp, ISBN: 87-92020-44-5, accessible online at http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. ISBN: 87-92020-44-5 (10 digits), 978-87-92020-44-4 (13 digits). Persistent URI: http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. Language: English. Copyright © F. W. Welter-Schultes & Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 2012. Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and opinions presented in this publication are those of the author and do not represent those of GBIF. License: This document is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0. Document Control: Version Description Date of release Author(s) 0.1 First complete draft. January 2012 F. W. Welter- Schultes 0.2 Document re-structured to improve February 2012 F. W. Welter- usability. Available for public Schultes & A. review. González-Talaván 1.0 First public version of the June 2012 F. W. Welter- document. Schultes 1.1 Minor editions March 2013 F. W. Welter- Schultes Cover Credit: GBIF Secretariat, 2012. Image by Levi Szekeres (Romania), obtained by stock.xchng (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1389360). March 2013 ii Guidelines for the management of digital zoological names information Version 1.1 Table of Contents How to use this book ......................................................................... 1 SECTION I 1. Introduction ................................................................................ 2 1.1. Identifiers and the role of Linnean names ......................................... 2 1.1.1 Identifiers ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Distribution of Sphaerium Nucleus (Studer, 1820) (Bivalvia: Sphaeriidae) in the Czech Republic
    Malacologica Bohemoslovaca (2008), 7: 26–32 ISSN 1336-6939 Recent distribution of Sphaerium nucleus (Studer, 1820) (Bivalvia: Sphaeriidae) in the Czech Republic TEREZA KOŘÍNKOVÁ1, LUBOŠ BERAN2 & MICHAL HORSÁK3 1Department of Zoology, Charles University, Viničná 7, Praha 2, CZ-12844, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] 2 Kokořínsko PLA Administration, Česká 149, Mělník, CZ-27601, Czech Republic, e-mail [email protected] 3 Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, CZ-61137, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] KOŘÍNKOVÁ T., BERAN L. & HORSÁK M., 2008: Recent distribution of Sphaerium nucleus (Studer, 1820) (Bivalvia: Sphaeriidae) in the Czech Republic. – Malacologica Bohemoslovaca, 7: 26–32. Online serial at <http://mollusca. sav.sk> 3-Apr-2008. Recent data about the distribution of Sphaerium nucleus in the Czech Republic are summarized and used in an attempt to evaluate its conservation status. During the last ten years, this species was found at 40 sites, mostly shallow small water bodies situated in lowland river alluviums. These types of habitats are generally endangered due to the huge human impact and exploration of these areas. The revision of voucher specimens of Sphaerium corneum s.lat. deposited in museum collections yielded a further 22 old records of S. nucleus Key words: Sphaerium nucleus, distribution, molluscan assemblages, habitats, threats Introduction The aim of this paper is to summarize all known records of S. nucleus in the Czech Republic based on both results In the last two decades, research on sibling species com- of current field researches and revisions of collection ma- plexes has been widely involved in taxonomy and distri- terials.
    [Show full text]
  • Format Mitteilungen
    9 Mitt. dtsch. malakozool. Ges. 86 9 – 12 Frankfurt a. M., Dezember 2011 Under Threat: The Stability of Authorships of Taxonomic Names in Malacology RUUD A. BANK Abstract: Nomenclature must be constructed in accordance with agreed rules. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature was founded in Leiden in September 1895. It not only produced a Code of nomencla- ture, that was refined over the years, but also provided arbitration and advice service, all with the aim of ensur- ing that every animal has one unique and universally accepted name. Name changes reduce the efficiency of biological nomenclature as a reference system. The Code was established to precisely specify the circumstances under which a name must be changed, and in what way. Name changes are only permitted if it is necessitated by a correction of nomenclatural error, by a change in classification, or by a correction of a past misidentification. Also authorships are regulated by the Code, mainly by Article 50. In a recent paper by WELTER-SCHULTES this Article is interpreted in a way that is different from previous interpretations by the zoological (malacological) community, leading to major changes in authorships. It is here argued that his alternative interpretations (1) are not in line with the spirit of the Code, and (2) will not serve the stability of nomenclature. It is important that interpretation and application of the existing rules be objective, consistent, and clear. Keywords: authorships, malacology, nomenclature, Code, ICZN, Article 50, Pisidium Zusammenfassung: In der Nomenklatur müssen übereinstimmende Regeln gelten. Die Internationale Kommis- sion für Zoologische Nomenklatur (ICZN) wurde im September 1895 in Leiden gegründet.
    [Show full text]