DOCSLIB.ORG

Characterization of Maize Producing Households in Manyoni and Chamwino Districts in Tanzania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Characterization of Maize Producing Households in Manyoni and Chamwino Districts in Tanzania Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) Project Country Report – Household Survey Characterization of Maize Producing Households in Manyoni and Chamwino Districts in Tanzania Anna Temu, Appolinary Manyama, Charles Mgeni, Augustine Langyintuo and Betty Waized The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, known by its Spanish acronym, CIMMYT® (www.cimmyt.org), is an international, not-for-profit research and training organization. With partners in over 100 countries, the center works to sustainably increase the productivity of maize and wheat systems to ensure global food security and reduce poverty. The center's outputs and services include improved maize and wheat varieties and cropping systems, the conservation of maize and wheat genetic resources, and capacity building. CIMMYT belongs to and is funded by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) (www.cgiar.org) and also receives support from national governments, foundations, development banks, and other public and private agencies. CIMMYT is particularly grateful for the generous, unrestricted funding that has kept the center strong and effective over many years. The Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) project is jointly being implemented by CIMMYT and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Its funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Howard G. Buffett Foundation. The project is part of a broad partnership also involving national agricultural research and extension systems, seed companies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), community-based organizations (CBOs), and advanced research institutes, together known as the DTMA Initiative. Its activities build on longer-term support by other donors, including the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), and the Eiselen Foundation. The project aims to develop and disseminate drought tolerant, high-yielding, locally-adapted maize varieties and to reach 30–40 million people in sub-Saharan Africa with these varieties in 10 years. © International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) 2011. All rights reserved. The designations employed in the presentation of materials in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of CIMMYT or its contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. CIMMYT encourages fair use of this material. Proper citation is requested. Correct citation: Temu, A., A. Manyama, C. Mgeni, A. Langyintuo and B. Waized. 2011. Characterization of Maize Producing Households in Manyoni and Chamwino Districts in Tanzania. Country Report – Tanzania. Nairobi: CIMMYT. This report is presented without a thorough peer review with the main purpose of making data and information rapidly available to research teams and partners in the DTMA project and for use in developing future, peer-reviewed publications. Readers are invited to send comments directly to the corresponding author(s). The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect opinions of CIMMYT, Sokoine University, other partners, or donors. ii Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) Project Country Report – Household Survey Characterization of Maize Producing Households in Manyoni and Chamwino Districts in Tanzania Anna Temu¹*, Appolinary Manyama¹, Charles Mgeni1, Augustine Langyintuo² and Betty Waized¹ December 2011 ¹Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania ²International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Harare Zimbabwe; present affiliation: Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), Nairobi, Kenya *Corresponding Author: Tel: +255-75-5534436; e-mail: [email protected] Contents Tables ........................................................................................................................................ v Acronyms .................................................................................................................................. vi Foreword and acknowledgement ............................................................................................vii 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 Materials and Method ........................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Sampling and data collection ........................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Agro-climatic characterizations of survey locations ..................................................................... 2 2.3 Data analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3.1 Principal component analysis .......................................................................................................... 2 2.3.2 Logistic regression .......................................................................................................................... 3 3 Household Characteristics ................................................................................................ 5 3.1 Categorizing household access to capital assets ........................................................................... 5 3.2 Human capital .................................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Natural capital .................................................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Physical capital ................................................................................................................................... 7 3.5 Financial capital ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.6 Social capital ....................................................................................................................................... 7 4 Household livelihood strategies ........................................................................................ 8 4.1 Crop production ................................................................................................................................ 8 4.2 Livestock production ........................................................................................................................ 9 4.3 Threats and constraints affecting livelihood strategies ................................................................ 9 5 Technology use in crop production ................................................................................. 10 5.1 Maize input and seed use ............................................................................................................... 10 5.2 Determinants of adoption of improved maize varieties ............................................................ 12 6 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 14 References ................................................................................................................................ 15 iv Tables Table 1: Categorization of capital assets covered in survey instrument ............................................................ 5 Table 2: Distribution of households by wealth categories .................................................................................. 6 Table 3: Type of dwelling used by surveyed households (n=151) ..................................................................... 7 Table 4: Main sources of institutional support to households ........................................................................... 7 Table 5: Determinants of cultivated farm size ...................................................................................................... 8 Table 6: Dynamics of cultivated farm size (% households) ................................................................................ 9 Table 7: Month when households were food insecure ........................................................................................ 9 Table 8: Number of months when households were food insecure ................................................................. 9 Table 9: Seed quantity purchased 2007/8 by variety by district (Kg) ............................................................ 11 Table 10: Farmer’s reported sources of seed bought (counts) ......................................................................... 11 Table 11: Factors considered for maize variety selection (% hh reporting) ................................................... 11 Table 12: Variables used in analyzing the factors affecting adoption .............................................................. 12 Table 13: Determinants of adoption of improved maize variety ..................................................................... 13 v Acronyms DFID : Department for International Development (United Kingdom) DTMA: Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa Hh : Household MEU : Man-Equivalent Units MT : Metric ton NGOs : Non-Governmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land Institutions and Political Ethnicity in Africa: Evidence from Tanzania
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LSE Research Online Catherine Boone, Lydia Nyeme Land institutions and political ethnicity in Africa: evidence from Tanzania Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Boone, Catherine and Nyeme, Lydia (2014) Land institutions and political ethnicity in Africa: evidence from Tanzania. Journal of Comparative Politics. ISSN 0010-4159 © 2014 The City University of New York This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/59615/ Available in LSE Research Online: October 2014 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. 26 Sept. 2014 LAND INSTITUTIONS AND POLITICAL ETHNICITY IN AFRICA: EVIDENCE FROM TANZANIA Catherine Boone with Lydia Nyeme Authors Catherine Boone is Professor of Comparative Politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Tanzania in Figures
    2019 Tanzania in Figures The United Republic of Tanzania 2019 TANZANIA IN FIGURES National Bureau of Statistics Dodoma June 2020 H. E. Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli President of the United Republic of Tanzania “Statistics are very vital in the development of any country particularly when they are of good quality since they enable government to understand the needs of its people, set goals and formulate development programmes and monitor their implementation” H.E. Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli the President of the United Republic of Tanzania at the foundation stone-laying ceremony for the new NBS offices in Dodoma December, 2017. What is the importance of statistics in your daily life? “Statistical information is very important as it helps a person to do things in an organizational way with greater precision unlike when one does not have. In my business, for example, statistics help me know where I can get raw materials, get to know the number of my customers and help me prepare products accordingly. Indeed, the numbers show the trend of my business which allows me to predict the future. My customers are both locals and foreigners who yearly visit the region. In June every year, I gather information from various institutions which receive foreign visitors here in Dodoma. With estimated number of visitors in hand, it gives me ample time to prepare products for my clients’ satisfaction. In terms of my daily life, Statistics help me in understanding my daily household needs hence make proper expenditures.” Mr. Kulwa James Zimba, Artist, Sixth street Dodoma.”. What is the importance of statistics in your daily life? “Statistical Data is useful for development at family as well as national level because without statistics one cannot plan and implement development plans properly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decentralisation-Centralisation Dilemma: Recruitment And
    BMC International Health and Human Rights BioMed Central Research article Open Access The decentralisation-centralisation dilemma: recruitment and distribution of health workers in remote districts of Tanzania Michael A Munga*1,2, Nils Gunnar Songstad1, Astrid Blystad3,1 and Ottar Mæstad4 Address: 1Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, 2Department of Health Systems and Policy Research, National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 3Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care (ISF), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway and 4Chr Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway Email: Michael A Munga* - [email protected]; Nils Gunnar Songstad - [email protected]; Astrid Blystad - [email protected]; Ottar Mæstad - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 30 April 2009 Received: 8 September 2008 Accepted: 30 April 2009 BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9:9 doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-9 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/9 © 2009 Munga et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: The implementation of decentralisation reforms in the health sector of Tanzania started in the 1980s. These reforms were intended to relinquish substantial powers and resources to districts to improve the development of the health sector. Little is known about the impact of decentralisation on recruitment and distribution of health workers at the district level.
    [Show full text]
  • Beekeeping for Poverty Reduction and Biodiversity Conservation
    Bees for Development Journal 101 Beekeeping for poverty reduction and biodiversity conservation Angela R Mwakatobe, Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, PO Box 661, Arusha, Tanzania Raphael M Machumu, Forestry Training Institute Olmotonyi, PO Box 943, Arusha, Tanzania Keywords: beeswax, honey, income generation, Manyoni District, Tanzania involved in the honey beer business and in producing equipment and protective clothing. For about 70% of beekeepers interviewed, income from Introduction selling bee products subsidised household economies by at least 30%. Beekeeping in Tanzania plays a major role in socio-economic development. It is an important source of income especially for Honey production communities living close to forests and woodlands (BID Journal 89, The major areas of honey production in Tanzania are Dodoma, Iringa, 2008). In Tanzania current honey and beeswax production stand at 3.5% of Singida and Tabora Regions (NWRC, 2007). Manyoni District has a high estimated potential figures (Mwakatobe & Mlingwa, 2005). This low beekeeping production potential (Table 2), as it was reported by Village production indicates an opportunity to increase beekeeping activities to Beekeeping Development Groups that income accrued per individual raise income and reduce poverty. Despite its significance, there is little beekeeper increased from an average US$150 (€112) in June 2000, to empirical evidence of the value of traditional beekeeping for income US$691 (€516) in June 2003. With an average of four beekeepers at generation. Our research aims to assess the contribution of traditional household level, income per household increased from US$450 (€336) to beekeeping to poverty reduction in Manyoni District. The results will US$2,764 (€2,064).
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal E-Mail: [email protected] Coordinating Office
    150 route de Ferney, P.O. Box 2100 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Tel: 41 22 791 6033 Fax: 41 22 791 6506 Appeal e-mail: [email protected] Coordinating Office Tanzania Food Relief Assistance – AFTZ61 Appeal Target: US$ 741,141 Geneva, 21 March 2006 Dear Colleagues, The latest Tanzanian government report on the food situation shows that from February to April, 3.76 million people - more than 10 percent of the country's population- will need 99,676 tonnes of maize food aid. According to the country's Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security the food deficit in Tanzania is linked to the failure of short rains between August and November 2005 which account for 30% of annual harvests in the country. A Rapid Vulnerability Assessment carried out by the government, WFP, and NGOs in early February identified 564,000 of the total impacted population as being destitute and in need of free food distribution. To date, the government of Tanzania has not declared a national emergency but WFP and NGOs are concerned that government resources are insufficient to meet the urgent needs of this vulnerable population. The long rainy season is now expected between March and May, but if it fails or comes too late, the number of people needing food relief could go up. ACT member the Christian Council of Tanzania (CCT) is appealing for assistance to provide food relief to approximately 80,500 of the most destitute people in seven regions in rural Tanzania, to be distributed through its member churches the Anglican Church of Tanzania (ACT), the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Tanzania (ELCT), the African Inland Church of Tanzania (AIC) and the Mennonite Church of Tanzania (MEN) stationed across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper February 2021 CONTENTS
    THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SUNFLOWER IN TANZANIA: A CASE OF SINGIDA REGION Aida C. Isinika and John Jeckoniah WP 49 Working Paper February 2021 CONTENTS Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive summary ........................................................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….................................... 7 2 Methodology………………………………………………………………………... ............................... 8 3 Trends in sunflower value chain……………………………………………………. ........................... 9 3.1 Supply and demand ......................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Trend of sunflower production and processing .................................................................. 9 3.3 Increasing processing capacity ....................................................................................... 10 3.4 The role of imports and exports ...................................................................................... 11 4 The sunflower subsector ............................................................................................................ 13 4.1 The market map……………………………………………………………………. ............... 13 4.2 Relations within the sunflower
    [Show full text]
  • In Singida Region, Tanzania
    INSTITUTE OF RESOURCE ASSESSMENT UNWERS1TY OF~DARES SALAAM RESEARCH REPORT NO. 6~ DEVELOPMENT OF WATER SUPPLIES: ~— —~ IN SINGIDA REGION, TANZANIA PAST EXPERIENCES ANfl FUTURE OPTIONS LIGRAHY ~nteni~t~c~ajRsfr~c~C~ntr, t~ComrnunIt~W~t~rSupp’y INGVAR ANDERSSON CAROLYN HANNAN - ANDERSSON ~( 824 —29 02 Institute of Resource Assessment University of Dar es Salaarn Research Report No. 62 DEVELOPMENT OF WATER SUPPLIES IN SINGIDA REGION, TANZANIA PAST EXPERIENCE AND FUTURE OPTIONS. Ingvar Andersson ;- Carolyn Hannan—Andersson I CE~ifl~Rfl ~Tei (C7~ ~1i1 -~ June ~984 Institute of Resource Assessment University of Oar es Salaam Box 35097 Oar es Salaam Tanzania ABSTRACT The water supply/sanitation/health situation in 3 villages in Singida Region was the focus of this study. The objective was to investigate general conditions and to identify the explicit needs of the communities. Relevant socio-economic data on production, livestock, ecological system, etc, is presented, as well as a historical overview of the developments in the water supply sector. Water-use patterns and standards of health, hygiene and sanitation were investigated in 75 households. An attempt was made to evaluate improvements to the water supply in two of the villages, i.e. the functioning of the supplies, the extent of utilization and the impact, e.g. on water use patterns, work burdens and general welfare and health. The effectiveness of the strategy for improving water supplies using shallow wellls with handpumps is assessed. The aspects of density and location of supply are stressed as crucial for the achievement of impact. An alternative strategy is suggested — the improvement of all traditional sources both for domestic and non-domestic uses (livestock and small vegetable gardens).
    [Show full text]
  • Tajas Vol.18 No.1 June 2019
    An International Journal of Basic and Applied Research (TAJAS) June, 2019 Vol. 18 No. 1 www.sua.ac.tz ISSN 0856-664X Published by: College of Agriculture Division of Research & Dev. Sokoine University of Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture, Morogoro, Dar es salaam Tanzania www.coa.ac.tz/college_agriculture TANZANIA JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES June, 2019 Vol. 18 No. 1 ii Tanzania Journal of Agricultural Sciences Editor- in-Chief Prof. C.N. Nyaruhucha Department of Food Technology, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, SUA. Deputy Editor- in-Chief Dr H. Tindwa Department of Soil Science Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro Dr. J.M. Nkuba MALF Editorial Advisory Board Prof. S. Deckers KU Leuven, Belgium Dr. H. Tindwa Department of Soil and Geological Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro Dr. J.M. Nkuba MALF Prof. M. Erbaugh OSU, USA. Prof. D. Mwaseba Dept. of Agric. Extension and Community Development, SUA, Morogoro Prof. L.O. Eik UMB, NORWAY. Dr. G. Rwegasira Department of Crop Sciences and Horticulture, SUA, Morogoro Dr. D.M. Komwihangilo TALIRI, Mpwapwa, Dodoma . Dr. A. Shoko TAFIRI, Dar es Salaam Dr. C.Z. Mkangwa ARI – Mlingano, TANGA Dr. L.M. Chove Dept. of Food Technology, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, SUA. The Scientific/Technical Editors Sub-committee of Tanzania Journal of Agricultural Sciences Dr. T. Jumbe Dept. of Food Technology, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, SUA, Morogoro. Dr. B. Msangi Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH), Dar es Salaam. Prof. P. Kusolwa Department of Crop Sciences and Horticulture, SUA, Morogoro. Prof. F. Kahimba Department of Engineering Sciences and Technology, SUA, Morogoro Dr. D. Mushi Department of Animal Aquaculture and Range Sciences, SUA, Morogoro Promotion Committee Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Running in Tanzania As an Economy
    Negotiating ‘Modernity’ on the Run Migration, Age Transition and „Development‟ in a Training Camp for Female Athletes in Arusha, Tanzania Aline Taylor _________________________________________ A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology University Of Canterbury August 2008 _______________________________________________________ Abstract Sports have recently been incorporated into international development agendas in a bid to „empower‟ women and foster gender equality. Considered a masculine domain, sports are argued to empower women by challenging the status quo and their „traditional‟ positions in societies. This thesis examines the use of sport in an athletic training camp for female distance runners located in Arusha, Northern Tanzania. Like other similar camps throughout East Africa, this training camp provides financial support for athletes, recruited from isolated rural areas, to live and train full time in the city. The camp was founded and is run by a Tanzanian couple, known as Gwandu and Mama Gwandu, but it has recently begun receiving financial support from an American development organisation. The director of this organisation, Karl, aims to empower the young women training in the camp by enabling them to use their sporting talent to further their education. This directly contradicts Gwandu and Mama Gwandu‟s goals, however, and they strive to enable the girls to improve their lives by earning money from running. The girls themselves perceive running as a unique opportunity to migrate to Arusha and distance themselves from their natal villages. The idea of earning money from running is secondary, for the girls, to the aspiration of settling permanently in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Access to Food in Tanzania: a Food Basket Approach, EIB-135, U.S
    United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Measuring Access to Food Service Economic in Tanzania: A Food Basket Information Bulletin Number 135 Approach February 2015 Nancy Cochrane and Anna D’Souza United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service www.ers.usda.gov Access this report online: www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib135 Download the charts contained in this report: • Go to the report’s index page www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib135 • Click on the bulleted item “Download eib135.zip” • Open the chart you want, then save it to your computer Recommended citation format for this publication: Cochrane, Nancy, and Anna D’Souza. Measuring Access to Food in Tanzania: A Food Basket Approach, EIB-135, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, February 2015. Cover images: Nancy Cochrane, USDA, Economic Research Service. Use of commercial and trade names does not imply approval or constitute endorsement by USDA. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaria in the 2010 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey
    Malaria in the 2010 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS) The 2010 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS) provides up-to-date information on the population and health situation in Tanzania, including malaria. Over 9,600 households were interviewed and over 6,600 children were tested for anaemia. Trend graphs show changes since the 2004-05 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS) and the 2007-08 Tanzania HIV/AIDS and Malaria Indicator Survey (THMIS). Ownership of At Least One ITN by Region Ownership of More than One ITN by Region National Average: 64% National Average: 37% Kagera Mara Kagera Mara 68% 84% 42% 58% Mwanza Mwanza Arusha Arusha 79% Trends in ITN Ownership 53% 51% Kilimanjaro 23% Kilimanjaro Shinyanga 85% 49% Percent of households that own at least Shinyanga 66% 21% one insecticide-treated net Kigoma Manyara 64 Kigoma Manyara Tabora 73% Pemba N. 88% Tabora 50% Pemba N. 70% 58% Sin- Tanga 34% Sin- Tanga 73% Pemba S. 73% 53% Pemba S. 54% gida 60% 39 gida 31% Dodoma Unguja N. 87% Dodoma Unguja N. 66% 34% 20% 72% Unguja S. 90% 23 36% Unguja S. 71% Rukwa Town West 61% Rukwa Town West 40% Moro- Moro- 67% 40% Iringa goro Pwani Dar es Salaam Iringa goro Pwani Dar es Salaam Mbeya 53% 37% 69% 62% 2004-05 2007-08 2010 Mbeya 26% 18% 40% 26% 58% TDHS THMIS TDHS 33% Lindi Lindi 64% 36% Percent of households with Percent of households with at least one insecticide- Ruvuma more than one insecticide- Ruvuma treated net 70% Mtwara treated net 38% Mtwara 64% 36% Currently 64% of Tanzanian households own at least one insecticide-treated net (ITN).
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Laddunnuri Maternal Mortatlity Tanzaniax
    International Journal of Caring Sciences 2013 May - August Vol 6 Issue 2 236 . O R I G I N A L P A P E R .r . Maternal Mortality in Rural Areas of Dodoma Region, Tanzania: a Qualitative Study Madan Mohan Laddunuri, PhD Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Dodoma University, Dodoma, Tanzania Coresponcence: Dr Madan Mohan Laddunuri, Post Box 259 Dodoma university, Dodoma, Tanzania. E-mail [email protected] Abstract Background: A major public health concern in Tanzania is the high rate of maternal deaths as the estimated Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is 454 per 100,000 live births (TDHS, 2010). The main objective of the present study was to find out the contributing factors to maternal mortality in rural areas of Dodoma region of Tanzania. Methodology: The verbal autopsy technique was used to reconstruct “the road to maternal death.” A structured open-ended questionnaire was developed on the basis of the “three delays” model: delay in the decision to seek care, delay in arrival at a health facility and delay in the provision of adequate care. The sample comprised of 20 cases, 4 for each district of Dodoma. Data were collected by conducting in-depth interviews with close relatives of the deceased women and those who accompanied the women (neighbours) during the time the illness developed to death. Results: There was delay in receiving appropriate medical care and that eventually lead to the death of the pregnant woman, due to underestimation of the severity of the complication, bad experience with the health care system, delay in reaching an appropriate medical facility, lack of transportation, or delay in receiving appropriate care after reaching to the hospital.
    [Show full text]