Exchange rate on Jan. 2008 is US$ 1.00 = Tanzanian Shilling Tsh 1,108.83 = Japanese Yen ¥ 114.21 TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUPPORTING REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES ABBREVIATIONS

CHAPTER 1 METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOGY...... 1 - 1 1.1 Purpose of Survey ...... 1 - 1 1.2 Meteorology ...... 1 - 1 1.2.1 Meteorological Network...... 1 - 1 1.2.2 Meteorological Data Analysis ...... 1 - 2 1.3 Hydrology ...... 1 - 7 1.3.1 River Network ...... 1 - 7 1.3.2 River Regime...... 1 - 8 1.3.3 River Flow Discharge Measurement ...... 1 - 10 1.4 Water Use...... 1 - 12

CHAPTER 2 GEOMORPHOLOGY...... 2 - 1 2.1 Purpose of Survey ...... 2 - 1 2.2 Survey Area...... 2 - 1 2.3 Methodology of Geomorphologic Analysis...... 2 - 1 2.3.1 Used Remote Sensing Data ...... 2 - 1 2.3.2 Data Processing and Analysis...... 2 - 2 2.3.3 Field Survey...... 2 - 4 2.4 Geomorphologic Characteristics ...... 2 - 5 2.4.1 Topography...... 2 - 5 2.4.2 Nature of Ground Surface...... 2 - 7

CHAPTER 3 GEOLOGY ...... 3 - 1 3.1 General Geology...... 3 - 1 3.2 Geological Description...... 3 - 2 3.2.1 Precambrian Basement Rocks ...... 3 - 4 3.2.2 Kainozoic (Cenozoic) Formations...... 3 - 5 3.2.3 Volcanic Rocks...... 3 - 5 3.3 Geological Structure...... 3 - 5 3.4 Results of Field Survey ...... 3 - 7 3.5 Detailed Analysis of Sub-Basin G by Remote Sensing ...... 3 - 16 3.5.1 Purpose of Survey...... 3 - 16 3.5.2 Survey Area ...... 3 - 16 3.5.3 Used Remote Sensing Data and Product Images...... 3 - 16 3.5.4 Survey Results ...... 3 - 20

CHAPTER 4 WATER BALANCE ANALYSIS BY USING REMOTE SENSING...... 4 - 1 4.1 Purpose of Survey ...... 4 - 1 4.2 Survey Area...... 4 - 1 4.3 Detailed Water Balance Analysis for the Sub-basin G ...... 4 - 2 4.3.1 Evapotranspiration...... 4 - 5 4.3.2 Rainfall ...... 4 - 13 4.3.3 Runoff...... 4 - 14 4.3.4 Infiltration...... 4 - 15 4.3.5 Results of Detailed Water Analysis for the Sub-basin G...... 4 - 18 4.4 Simplified Water Balance Analysis for the Sub-basins in IDB ...... 4 - 19 4.4.1 Sub-basin A ( Sub-basin)...... 4 - 24 4.4.2 Sub-basin B (Monduli Sub-basin (1))...... 4 - 25 4.4.3 Sub-basin C (Monduli Sub-basin (2))...... 4 - 25 4.4.4 Sub-basin D ( Sub-basin)...... 4 - 25 4.4.5 Sub-basin E ( Sub-basin) ...... 4 - 25 4.4.6 Sub-basin F (Olduvai Sub-basin)...... 4 - 26 4.4.7 Sub-basin G (Bahi (Manyoni) Sub-basin) ...... 4 - 26 4.4.8 Sub-basin H (Masai Steppe Sub-basin) ...... 4 - 26 4.4.9 Sub-basin I (Namanga Sub-basin)...... 4 - 26 4.4.10 Summary of the Water Balance in February (Rainy Season)...... 4 - 27 4.5 Macro Water Balance Analysis...... 4 - 28  CHAPTER 5 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY...... 5 - 1 5.1 Outline of Survey ...... 5 - 1 5.1.1 Purpose of Survey...... 5 - 1 5.1.2 Planned Survey Location...... 5 - 1 5.1.3 Survey Quantity...... 5 - 1 5.2 Survey Methodology...... 5 - 2 5.2.1 Vertical Electrical Sounding...... 5 - 2 5.2.2 Two-dimensional Resistivity Survey...... 5 - 6 5.2.3 Magnetic Survey...... 5 - 11 5.3 Survey Result...... 5 - 15 5.3.1 Geological Structure Survey (Vertical Electrical Sounding)...... 5 - 15 5.3.2 Geophysical Survey for Test Borehole Drilling ...... 5 - 25

CHAPTER 6 TEST BOREHILE DRILLING SURVEY...... 6 - 1 6.1 Purpose of Survey ...... 6 - 1 6.2 Drilling Work ...... 6 - 1 6.2.1 Outline of the Work...... 6 - 1 6.2.2 Specification of Survey...... 6 - 3 6.2.3 Drilling Procedure ...... 6 - 4 6.2.4 Drilling Method ...... 6 - 5 6.2.5 Sampling, Measurement and Testing ...... 6 - 6 6.2.6 Borehole Logging...... 6 - 6 6.2.7 Result of Drilling...... 6 - 9 6.3 Pumping Test...... 6 - 24 6.3.1 Method of Pumping Test ...... 6 - 24 6.3.2 Result of Pumping Test ...... 6 - 25 6.3.3 Water Sample for Water Quality Test ...... 6 - 34

CHAPTER 7 WATER QUALITY SURVEY...... 7 - 1 7.1 Introduction...... 7 - 1 7.2 Methodology ...... 7 - 1 7.2.1 Collecting of Existing Water Quality Data ...... 7 - 1 7.2.2 Simplified Water Quality Test ...... 7 - 4 7.2.3 Laboratory Test of Water Quality ...... 7 - 6 7.3 Survey Results...... 7 - 10 7.3.1 Water Quality of Surface Water ...... 7 - 11 7.3.2 Water Quality of Groundwater ...... 7 - 16 7.3.3 Seasonal Changes in Water Quality at Water Sources ...... 7 - 23 7.3.4 Water Pollution at Water Sources ...... 7 - 24 7.3.5 Sources of High Fluoride Content in Water Sources Based on Existing Materials ...... 7 - 27 7.3.6 Relationship between Fluoride and Other Water Quality Parameters at Water Sources ...... 7 - 28

CHAPTER 8 FLUORIDE PROBLEMS AND WATER-RELATED DISEASES...... 8 - 1 8.1 Fluoride Diseases Problems and Removal Measures ...... 8 - 1 8.1.1 Health Effect of Fluoride ...... 8 - 1 8.1.2 Fluoride Removal Techniques...... 8 - 4 8.1.3 Measures of Fluoride Removal by Other Donors, NGOs and International Organizations ...... 8 - 10 8.2 Water-related Diseases...... 8 - 11 8.2.1 Introduction ...... 8 - 11 8.2.2 Situation of Water-related Diseases in Study Areas...... 8 - 13 8.3 Dental Fluorosis in Internal Drainage Basin (IDB)...... 8 - 17 8.3.1 Introduction ...... 8 - 17 8.3.2 Materials and Methods ...... 8 - 21 8.3.3 Results ...... 8 - 25 8.3.4 Conclusions ...... 8 - 35 8.3.5 Recommendations ...... 8 - 36

CHAPTER 9 HYDROGEOLOGY ...... 9 - 1 9.1 Collection of Existing Data...... 9 - 1 9.1.1 Borehole Database...... 9 - 1 9.1.2 Water Supply Facilities Data...... 9 - 4 9.2 Inventory Survey of Existing Water Supply Facilities...... 9 - 8 9.2.1 Survey Items...... 9 - 8 9.2.2 Inventory Survey Result ...... 9 - 9 9.3 Hydrogeological Condition on each Geological Unit ...... 9 - 13 9.3.1 Granitic rock area (gs, gs-a, gs-b)...... 9 - 13 9.3.2 Metamorphic Rock area, Usagaran system (Xs, Xs-a, Xs-l) ...... 9 - 14 9.3.3 Dodoman System (D) ...... 9 - 16 9.3.4 Nyanzian System (Z) ...... 9 - 16 9.3.5 Volcanic area (Nv and Nvd)...... 9 - 17 9.3.6 Tertiary and Recent Sediment (N, Nl, and Nf)s ...... 9 - 18 9.3.7 Fault System related to the Great Rift Valley...... 9 - 19 9.4 Groundwater Flow Analysis...... 9 - 19 9.4.1 Altitude of Static Water Level...... 9 - 19 9.4.2 Water Quality Hexa-diagram Analysis...... 9 - 20 9.4.3 Groundwater Flow...... 9 - 21 9.5 Productivity Analysis and Hydrogeological Map ...... 9 - 24 9.5.1 Productivity Analysis ...... 9 - 24 9.5.2 Hydrogeological Mapping...... 9 - 28 9.5.1 Productivity Analysis ...... 9 - 24 9.6 Groundwater Potential Evaluation ...... 9 - 31 9.6.1 Indices for Groundwater Potential Evaluation...... 9 - 31 9.6.2 Groundwater Potential Evaluation...... 9 - 35

CHAPTER 10 SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS ...... 10 - 1 10.1 General Socio-economic Conditions of IDB...... 10 - 1 10.1.1 Administrative Setup and Population Distribution...... 10 - 1 10.1.2 General Economic Conditions...... 10 - 3 10.1.3 Social Service Conditions...... 10 - 9 10.1.4 Economic Infrastructure ...... 10 - 15 10.2 Socio-Economic Survey...... 10 - 19 10.2.1 Outline of Socioeconomic Survey...... 10 - 19 10.2.2 General Conditions of Sample Villages ...... 10 - 22 10.2.3 Economic Conditions of Sample Villages...... 10 - 25 10.2.4 Water Usage Conditions of Sample Villages ...... 10 - 26 10.2.5 Conditions of WUG/WUA ...... 10 - 32 10.2.6 Condition of Water Borne Disease and Influence of Fluoride ...... 10 - 37

CHAPTER 11 ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEM...... 11 - 1 11.1 Organizational System for Water Resources Development and Management ...... 11 - 1 11.1.1 National Development Plan for Water Sector ...... 11 - 1 11.1.2 Organization System for Water Sector ...... 11 - 2 11.2 Conditions of Basin Water Office in IDB (Phase-1 Study: Oct. 2005 – Mar. 2006) ...... 11 - 5 11.2.1 Organization Framework and Job Description of IDBWO ...... 11 - 5 11.2.2 Present Conditions of IDBWO and Issues To Be Solved...... 11 - 6 11.2.3 Sharing Roles and Coordination System with Other Organizations...... 11 - 8 11.3 Improvement of Organizational System for IDBWO (Phase-2 Jun. 2006 – Mar. 2007) .... 11 - 11 11.3.1 Capacity Development of IDBWO...... 11 - 11 11.4 Remaining Issue of IDBWO after Organization Strengthening Program (Phase-3 May 2007 – Nov. 2007) ...... 11 - 17

CHAPTER 12 CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT (CD) ...... 12 - 1 12.1 Purpose of CD...... 12 - 1 12.2 Contents of CD...... 12 - 1 12.3 Upskilling Technology Program ...... 12 - 1 12.3.1 Meteorology and Hydrology...... 12 - 1 12.3.2 GIS / Database...... 12 - 4 12.3.3 Remote Sensing ...... 12 - 7 12.3.4 Geophysical survey and Test Borehole Drilling Supervision...... 12 - 9 12.3.5 Hydrogeology ...... 12 - 11 12.4 Organization Strengthening for IBDWO ...... 12 - 13 12.4.1 Outline of Organization Strengthening Program (OSP) ...... 12 - 13 12.4.2 Preparation of OSP ...... 12 - 14 12.4.3 Activities of OSP ...... 12 - 15 12.5 IDBWO’s State after CD Program...... 12 - 19 12.5.1 Upskilling Program...... 12 - 19 12.5.2 Organization Strengthening Program ...... 12 - 20

CHAPTER 13 DATABASE SYSTEM AND GIS ...... 13 - 1 13.1 GIS/Database Data Collection ...... 13 - 1 13.1.1 Map...... 13 - 1 13.1.2 GIS Data ...... 13 - 4 13.1.3 Database...... 13 - 5 13.2 Evaluation of Collected Data ...... 13 - 6 13.2.1 GIS Data ...... 13 - 6 13.2.2 Database...... 13 - 7 13.3 Development Database and GIS (First Phase) ...... 13 - 11 13.3.1 Unifying GIS Coordinate System ...... 13 - 11 13.3.2 GIS Components Development ...... 13 - 12 13.3.3 Database Components Development ...... 13 - 16 13.4 Developing Database and GIS (Second Phase)...... 13 - 18 13.4.1 Village Boundary Development ...... 13 - 18 13.4.2 Achievement and Analysis ...... 13 - 19 13.4.3 Estimating Population by GIS ...... 13 - 21 13.4.4 GIS Analysis and Visualization...... 13 - 22 13.5 Designing Database...... 13 - 23 13.5.1 Basic Concept of IDB Database Management...... 13 - 23 13.5.2 Database Configuration ...... 13 - 24 13.5.3 Database Management System Configuration...... 13 - 33 13.6 Recommendation for the Future...... 13 - 40

CHAPTER 14 ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS ...... 14 - 1 14.1 National Environmental Policy ...... 14 - 1 14.2 Environment Management Act, 2004 ...... 14 - 2 14.3 National Environment Management Council...... 14 - 3 14.4 Environmental Impact Assessment ...... 14 - 4 14.4.1 Legal Obligation of Project Proponent ...... 14 - 4 14.4.2 Strategic Environmental Assessment...... 14 - 5 14.4.3 EIA Procedure and Guidelines...... 14 - 5 14.5 Basic Environmental Checklist for Water Sector (Draft)...... 14 - 6 14.6 IEE and/or EIA for the Study...... 14 - 7 14.7 Outline of Natural Environment...... 14 - 8 14.7.1 General...... 14 - 8 14.7.2 Outline of Natural Environment in the Internal Drainage Basin ...... 14 - 9 14.7.3 Protected Area Related to Groundwater Development...... 14 - 11 14.7.4 National Parks and Game Reserves in Internal Drainage Basin...... 14 - 12 14.7.5 Natural Environment and Protected Area in Each Region ...... 14 - 13 LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1 Area of Sub-basins in the Internal Drainage Basin...... 1 - 8 Table 1-2 Selected Hydrometric Stations...... 1 - 11 Table 1-3 Measurement Results of River Flow Discharge...... 1 - 12

Table 2-1 List of Used LANDSAT/ETM Data ...... 2 - 1

Table 3-1 Stratigraphy of the Study Area...... 3 - 2 Table 3-2 List of Used ASTER Data...... 3 - 17 Table 3-1 Stratigraphy of the Study Area by Detailed Analysis ...... 3 - 26

Table 4-1 List of Used LANDSAT ETM Data for Detail Analysis...... 4 - 2 Table 4-2 Used Hydrometric Gauging Station Data of River Water Level ...... 4 - 3 Table 4-3 Observed Monthly Weather Data of 2004 and Estimated Monthly Evapotranspiration (ET mak)...... 4 - 9 Table 4-4 Local Constant Value a and b ...... 4 - 9 Table 4-5 Recommended Values of Albedo (ERSDAC 2005) ...... 4 - 10 Table 4-6 Average River Water Discharge in February and September...... 4 - 15 Table 4-7 Runoff Coefficients of the Drainages in the Sub-basin G...... 4 - 15 Table 4-8 Results of Detailed Water Balance Analysis for Sub-basin G on February...... 4 - 18 Table 4-9 Results of Detailed Water Balance Analysis for Sub-basin G on September...... 4 - 18 Table 4-10 Used River Water Level Data of Hydrometric Gauging Station ...... 4 - 19 Table 4-11 Average River Water Discharge in February...... 4 - 24 Table 4-12 Estimation for Runoff Coefficient of Sub-basin A Area...... 4 - 24 Table 4-13 Results of Water Balance Analysis for Sub-basin A ...... 4 - 24 Table 4-14 Results of Water Balance Analysis for Sub-basin B...... 4 - 25 Table 4-15 Results of Water Balance Analysis for Sub-basin C...... 4 - 25 Table 4-16 Results of Water Balance Analysis for Sub-basin D ...... 4 - 25 Table 4-17 Results of Water Balance Analysis for Sub-basin E...... 4 - 25 Table 4-18 Results of Water Balance Analysis for Sub-basin F ...... 4 - 26 Table 4-19 Results of Water Balance Analysis for Sub-basin G ...... 4 - 26 Table 4-20 Results of Water Balance Analysis for Sub-basin H ...... 4 - 26 Table 4-21 Results of Water Balance Analysis for Sub-basin I...... 4 - 26 Table 4-22 Summary of Water Balance Analysis for IDB on February ...... 4 - 27 Table 4-23 Albedo Values...... 4 - 28 Table 4-24 Land Covers of Sub-basins in February 2000 by Remote Sensing...... 4 - 29

Table 5-1 Number of Survey Points for Geophysical Survey...... 5 - 1 Table 5-2 Measurement Schedule of Schlumberger Electrode Array...... 5 - 4 Table 5-3 Specification of Vertical Electrical Sounding Equipments...... 5 - 6 Table 5-4 Specification of Two-dimensional Resistivity Survey Equipments...... 5 - 9 Table 5-5 Specification of Magnetic Survey Equipment ...... 5 - 13 Table 5-6 Location and the Result of Vertical Electrical Sounding...... 5 - 16 Table 5-7 Comparison between Geology and Resistivity Value by VES ...... 5 - 20 Table 5-8 Resistivity Range and Geology in IDB...... 5 - 22 Table 5-9 Quantity of Survey in each Test Borehole Drilling Site ...... 5 - 26

Table 6-1 Location of Test Borehole Drilling Survey...... 6 - 1 Table 6-2 Result of Test Borehole Drilling Survey...... 6 - 35

Table 7-1 Contents of Water Quality Survey ...... 7 - 1 Table 7-2 Outline of Existing Data of Water Quality ...... 7 - 2 Table 7-3 Number of Water Sources for Water Quality Survey ...... 7 - 2 Table 7-4 Water Quality Items and Analytical Methods for Simplified Water Quality Test 7 - 5 Table 7-5 Selected Villages and Water Sources for the First Simplified Water Quality Test 7 - 6 Table 7-6 Selected Villages and Water Sources for the Second Simplified Water Quality Test ...... 7 - 6 Table 7-7 Water Quality Parameters for Laboratory Test ...... 7 - 7 Table 7-8 Items and Analytical Methods for Laboratory Test of Water Quality ...... 7 - 9 Table 7-9 Selected Villages and Existing Water Sources for Laboratory Test of Water Quality...... 7 - 10 Table 7-10 Water Quality in Lakes around the Study Area ...... 7 - 11 Table 7-11 Concentrations and Frequency of Occurrence for Fluoride, EC and pH in Surface Water in IDB...... 7 - 12 Table 7-12 Concentrations and Frequency of Occurrence for Fluoride(F), EC and pH in Shallow Groundwater in IDB ...... 7 - 16 Table 7-13 Concentrations and Frequency of Occurrence for Fluoride(F), EC and pH in Deep Groundwater in IDB...... 7 - 20 Table 7-14 Average of F and pH in Water Sources in Rainy and Dry Seasons...... 7 - 24 Table 7-15 Frequency of Occurrence for NO3, NH4, Fe, Mn and Coliform Bacteria in Water Sources in IDB...... 7 - 25

Table 8-1 Categories of Fluorosis ...... 8 - 1 Table 8-2 Occurrence of Fluorosis in School Children in Maji ya Chai Ward in Region expressed in terms of Dean Index ...... 8 - 4 Table 8-3 Comparison of Treatment Methods ...... 8 - 10 Table 8-4 Cumulative Reported Cases of Water-borne Diseases in the Study Regions in 2003...... 8 - 13 Table 8-5 Cumulative Reported Cases of Water-borne Diseases in the Study Regions in 2004 ...... 8 - 13 Table 8-6 Cumulative Reported Cases of Water-borne Diseases in the Study Regions in 2005 ...... 8 - 14 Table 8-7 Thylstrup and Fejerskov Index – Diagnostic Criteria for Dental Fluorosis Scores 8 - 22 Table 8-8 Clinical Form For Dental Fluorosis for the 12 - 18 Years Subjects...... 8 - 23 Table 8-9 Distribution of Children by Age, Sex and Regions...... 8 - 25 Table 8-10 Distribution of Study Participants by Altitude in Meters Above Sea Level ...... 8 - 26 Table 8-11 Distribution of Fluoride Concentration in Water by Regions...... 8 - 26 Table 8-12 Distribution of Children and Fluoride Concentration in Water by Regions ...... 8 - 26 Table 8-13 Distribution of water sources that were analyzed for fluoride levels...... 8 - 28 Table 8-14 Distribution of Fluoride Concentration in Magadi Samples by Regions...... 8 - 29 Table 8-15 Distribution of Children with TFI • 4 by District ...... 8 - 30 Table 8-16 Mean TFI for Different Tooth Types ...... 8 - 31 Table 8-17 Mean TFI of Each Region...... 8 - 31 Table 8-18 Knowledge and Awareness Related to Dental Fluorosis ...... 8 - 34

Table 9-1 Item of Provisional Borehole Database...... 9 - 3 Table 9-2 Rural Water Supply Service Coverage in IDB ...... 9 - 4 Table 9-3 Ratio of Households with Access to Improved Water Source...... 9 - 5 Table 9-4 Aggregated Result of Water Supply Facilities...... 9 - 7 Table 9-5 Survey Items of Inventory Survey ...... 9 - 9 Table 9-6 Number of Surveyed Village and Points in Each District...... 9 - 10 Table 9-7 Groundwater Flow Velocity around Test Borehole Drilling Site ...... 9 - 22 Table 9-8 Interpretation of VSW Map ...... 9 - 25 Table 9-9 Groundwater Productivity Condition in IDB...... 9 - 27 Table 9-10 Criteria of the Evaluation of Groundwater Potential ...... 9 - 28 Table 9-11 Outline of Groundwater Development Potential by District...... 9 - 29 Table 9-12 Evaluation of Well Yield ...... 9 - 31 Table 9-13 Affection of TDS to Animals and Agricultural Crops...... 9 - 32 Table 9-14 Allocation of Evaluation Scores by Each Index ...... 9 - 34

Table 10-1 Administrative Setup of IDB ...... 10 - 1 Table 10-2 Population and Number of Households in IDB ...... 10 - 2 Table 10-3 Comparison of Population between Rural Area and Urban Area in IDB ...... 10 - 3 Table 10-4 GDP and GDP /Capita in 6 Regions ...... 10 - 4 Table 10-5 Main Agricultural Products and their Productivity in IDB...... 10 - 5 Table 10-6 Cultivated Land in IDB...... 10 - 6 Table 10-7 Irrigated Land in IDB...... 10 - 7 Table 10-8 Livestock Population in IDB...... 10 - 7 Table 10-9 Water Supply Conditions in IDB...... 10 - 9 Table 10-10 Coverage Ratio of Toilet in IDB...... 10 - 10 Table 10-11 Health Facilities by District in IDB ...... 10 - 11 Table 10-12 Infant and Under Five Mortality Rates in 6 Regions ...... 10 - 12 Table 10-13 Water Borne Disease in 6 Regions ...... 10 - 12 Table 10-14 Public Primary Schools in 6 Regions...... 10 - 13 Table 10-15 Literacy Rates of Adults in IDB ...... 10 - 14 Table 10-16 Road Conditions in ...... 10 - 15 Table 10-17 Main Energy Sources in IDB...... 10 - 17 Table 10-18 Main Import Items in Tanzania...... 10 - 18 Table 10-19 Contents of Socioeconomic Survey ...... 10 - 20 Table 10-20 Gender Lines of Population ...... 10 - 23 Table 10-21 Average Income per Households ...... 10 - 25 Table 10-22 Average Expenditure per Households...... 10 - 25 Table 10-23 Distance from Water Source to Household...... 10 - 29 Table 10-24 Time for Fetching Water...... 10 - 30 Table 10-25 Formulation Condition of WUG/WUA in Village ...... 10 - 32

Table 11-1 Job Description of IDBWO...... 11 - 7 Table 11-2 Main Task and Coordination for Water Supply...... 11 - 9 Table 11-3 Staff Distribution of IDBWO...... 11 - 12 Table 11-4 Equipment & Tool List of IDBWO ...... 11 - 13 Table 11-5 Revised JOB Description of IDBWO ...... 11 - 14 Table 12-1 Upskilling Technology Program...... 12 - 1 Table 12-2 Organization Strengthening Program (OSP)...... 12 - 2 Table 12-3 Schedule of Upskilling Program for Meteorology and Hydrology...... 12 - 2 Table 12-4 Overview of Training Course in Meteorology and Hydrology as Capacity Development ...... 12 - 3 Table 12-5 Schedule of Upskilling Technology Program for GIS/ Database ...... 12 - 5 Table 12-6 Overview in GIS/Database Capacity Development...... 12 - 6 Table 12-7 Schedule of Upskilling Program for Remote Sensing ...... 12 - 7 Table 12-8 Overview in Remote Sensing Capacity Development ...... 12 - 8 Table 12-9 Schedule of Geophysical Survey and Test Borehole Drilling Supervision Training ...... 12 - 9 Table 12-10 Overview in Geophysical Survey and Test Borehole Drilling Supervision Capacity Development...... 12 - 10 Table 12-11 Schedule of Hydrogeology Training Course...... 12 - 11 Table 12-12 Overview in Hydrogeology Capacity Development ...... 12 - 12 Table 12-13 Schedule of Organization Strengthening Program (1) ...... 12 - 13 Table 12-14 Schedule of Organization Strengthening Program (2) ...... 12 - 13

Table 13-1 Collected Map...... 13 - 1 Table 13-2 Acquired 1/250,000 Topo-Map...... 13 - 2 Table 13-3 Acquired Administrative Map ...... 13 - 3 Table 13-4 MoWLD GIS Data...... 13 - 4 Table 13-5 Other GIS Data ...... 13 - 4 Table 13-6 Census GIS Data ...... 13 - 4 Table 13-7 MoWLD Database ...... 13 - 5 Table 13-8 Regional Database (Shinyanga) ...... 13 - 5 Table 13-9 Collected Borehole Catalog ...... 13 - 5 Table 13-10 Census Data ...... 13 - 5 Table 13-11 Number of Village ...... 13 - 6 Table 13-12 Geological Feature Legend ...... 13 - 13 Table 13-13 Categorized Road Type...... 13 - 14 Table 13-14 2002 Population and Housing Census (Population by Village)...... 13 - 16 Table 13-15 Developed Village List from 2002 Population and Housing Census...... 13 - 16 Table 13-16 Administrative Code Format and Example...... 13 - 17 Table 13-17 IDB_DB Configuration (simple version)...... 13 - 24 Table 13-18 IDB_DB Configuration (detail version)...... 13 - 25 Table 13-19 GIS Figure ID and Name ...... 13 - 26 Table 13-20 GIS Layer Description 1 ...... 13 - 27 Table 13-21 GIS Layer Description 2 ...... 13 - 28 Table 13-22 GIS Layer Description 3 ...... 13 - 29 Table 13-23 GIS Layer Description 4 ...... 13 - 30 Table 13-24 GIS Layer Description 5 ...... 13 - 31 Table 13-25 Map and Satellite Configuration...... 13 - 32 Table 13-26 IDB DBMS Table List ...... 13 - 39

Table 14-1 Function of Technical Directorates in NEMC ...... 14 - 4 Table 14-2 Forest Reserves in ...... 14 - 15 Table 14-3 Forest Reserves in ...... 14 - 17 Table 14-4 Forest Reserves in ...... 14 - 20 Table 14-5 Forest Reserves in Region ...... 14 - 21 Table 14-6 Forest Reserves in ...... 14 - 23 LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Current Weather Stations in IDB and its Adjacent Area ...... 1 - 1 Figure 1-2 Averaged Maximum and Minimum Temperatures in Major Towns in IDB and its Adjacent Area ...... 1 - 2 Figure 1-3 Distribution Map of Annual Rainfall in IDB and its Adjacent Area ...... 1 - 3 Figure 1-4 Averaged Monthly Rainfall in Major Towns in IDB and its Adjacent Area ...... 1 - 4 Figure 1-5 Averaged Sunshine Duration in Major Towns in IDB and its Adjacent Area..... 1 - 4 Figure 1-6 Averaged Pan Evaporation in Major Towns in IDB and its Adjacent Area ...... 1 - 5 Figure 1-7 Averaged Relative Humidity in Major Towns in IDB and its Adjacent Area ..... 1 - 5 Figure 1-8 Wind Rose in IDB and its Adjacent Area ...... 1 - 6 Figure 1-9 Sub-basins, River Network and Hydrometric Gauging Stations in the Internal Drainage Basin...... 1 - 7 Figure 1-10 Flow Duration Curves...... 1 - 9 Figure 1-11 Monthly Averaged River Flow Discharges at 1974...... 1 - 9 Figure 1-12 Water Level Change of Lake Kitangiri (2K13) ...... 1 - 10 Figure 1-13 Locations of River Flow Discharge Measurement Points...... 1 - 11 Figure 1-14 Water Use derived from Water Right Information ...... 1 - 13

Figure 2-1 Location of used LANDSAT/ETM+ data...... 2 - 2 Figure 2-2 LANDSAT ETM False Color Image (B, G, R: band1, band4, band5)...... 2 - 3 Figure 2-3 Concept of Vegetation, Soil and Water(VSW) Indices...... 2 - 4 Figure 2-4 Location of Field Survey Points...... 2 - 5 Figure 2-5 SRTM DEM Image...... 2 - 7 Figure 2-6 Three Dimensional Topographic Map of the Internal Drainage Basin...... 2 - 8 Figure 2-7 SAVI (Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index) Image ...... 2 - 9 Figure 2-8 VSW Image (V; vegetation, S; Soil, W; Water and Moisture)...... 2 - 9 Figure 2-9 Land Cover Map ...... 2 - 10

Figure 3-1 Structural Map of East African Rift System ...... 3 - 1 Figure 3-2 Geological Map of the Internal Drainage Basin ...... 3 - 3 Figure 3-3 Distribution of Faults and Lineaments...... 3 - 6 Figure 3-4 Location of Field Survey Points...... 3 - 7 Figure 3-5 ASTER False Colour Mosaic Image (B, G, R : Band1, Band3, Band6)...... 3 - 18 Figure 3-6 ASTER/DEM Shaded Elevation Image...... 3 - 19 Figure 3-7 Check Points of Field Survey...... 3 - 20 Figure 3-8 ASTER SAVI Image...... 3 - 22 Figure 3-9 Geological Interpretation Map of Sub-basin G Area ...... 3 - 27 Figure 3-10 ASTER Ratio image (B, G, R: Band4/Band6, Band4/Band1, Band2/Band1)..... 3 - 28

Figure 4-1 LANDSAT ETM+ False Colour Images (B, G, R : Band2, Band4, Band5) ..... 4 - 3 Figure 4-2 LANDSAT ETM+ SAVI Images ...... 4 - 4 Figure 4-3 LANDSAT ETM+ VSW Images ...... 4 - 4 Figure 4-4 Land Cover Maps ...... 4 - 5 Figure 4-5 Temperature Maps ...... 4 - 7 Figure 4-6 Sunshine Hours Maps ...... 4 - 8

Figure 4-7 Scatter Diagram of Observed E (evaporation) and Estimated ETmak ...... 4 - 9 Figure 4-8 Scatter Diagrams of Albedo and First Principal Component of LANDSAT ETM+ Data ...... 4 - 10 Figure 4-9 Albedo Maps ...... 4 - 11 Figure 4-10 Evapotranspiration Maps ...... 4 - 12 Figure 4-11 Rainfall Maps ...... 4 - 13 Figure 4-12 Hydrometric Gauging Stations of Sub-basin G and those Water Catchment Areas 4 - 14 Figure 4-13 Infiltration Map (I = P㧙ET㧙Ra×P) of 2R1A, 2R23, 2R25, 2R26 and 2R29 .. 4 - 16 Figure 4-14 Possible Infiltration Maps (I=P-ET) of Sub-basin G ...... 4 - 17 Figure 4-15 The Hydrometric Gauging Stations of IDB Area ...... 4 - 20 Figure 4-16 Sunshine Hours Map ...... 4 - 21 Figure 4-17 Temperature Map ...... 4 - 21 Figure 4-18 Rainfall Map ...... 4 - 22 Figure 4-19 Evapotranspiration Map ...... 4 - 22 Figure 4-20 Possible Infiltration Map (P-ET) ...... 4 - 23 Figure 4-21 Possible Infiltration on February ...... 4 - 27 Figure 4-22 Land Cover Ratio of Each Sub-basin ...... 4 - 29 Figure 4-23 Monthly Rainfall Change in Each Sub-basin ...... 4 - 31 Figure 4-24 Monthly Evapotranspiration Change in Each Sub-basin ...... 4 - 31 Figure 4-25 Monthly Change of Possible Infiltration (1) (unit: mm) ...... 4 - 32 Figure 4-26 Monthly Change of Possible Infiltration (2) (unit: mcm) ...... 4 - 33 Figure 4-27 Annual Possible Infiltration Rate (%) ...... 4 - 34

Figure 5-1 Conceptual Diagram of the Factor which Defines Resistivity ...... 5 - 2 Figure 5-2 Range of Resistivity Values for Various Materials ...... 5 - 3 Figure 5-3 Schematic Diagram of Schlumberger Configuration ...... 5 - 3 Figure 5-4 Schematic Diagram of Field Measurement and Measurement Procedure ...... 5 - 4 Figure 5-5 Flow Chart of Automatic Analysis ...... 5 - 5 Figure 5-6 Example of VES Analysis ...... 5 - 6 Figure 5-7 Schematic Diagram of Pole-pole Electrode Array ...... 5 - 7 Figure 5-8 Potential Distribution with Point Current Source ...... 5 - 7 Figure 5-9 Schematic Diagram of Field Measurement and Process for two-dimensional Resistivity Survey ...... 5 - 9 Figure 5-10 Automatic Inversion Flow Chart of Two-dimensional Resistivity Survey ...... 5 - 10 Figure 5-11 Example of Two-dimensional Resistivity Survey Analysis ...... 5 - 10 Figure 5-12 Range of Magnetic Susceptibility Value for Various Materials ...... 5 - 11 Figure 5-13 Schematic Diagram of the Model of Spherical Shell in the Geomagnetic Field 5 - 12 Figure 5-14 Schematic Diagram of Measurement for Magnetic Survey (G-858) ...... 5 - 13 Figure 5-15 Analysis Flowchart for Magnetic Survey ...... 5 - 14 Figure 5-16 Location Map of Survey Points for Vertical Electrical Sounding ...... 5 - 15 Figure 5-17 Typical Resistivity Structure -Pattern 1- ...... 5 - 21 Figure 5-18 Typical Resistivity Structure -Pattern 2- ...... 5 - 21 Figure 5-19 Typical Resistivity Structure -Pattern 3- ...... 5 - 22 Figure 5-20 Distribution of Bedrock Resistivity Based on Geophysical Survey ...... 5 - 23 Figure 5-21 Distribution of Bedrock Depth Based on Geophysical Survey ...... 5 - 24 Figure 5-22 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.1 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 27 Figure 5-23 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.2 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 28 Figure 5-24 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.3 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 29 Figure 5-25 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.4 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 30 Figure 5-26 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.5 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 31 Figure 5-27 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.6 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 32 Figure 5-28 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.7 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 33 Figure 5-29 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.8 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 34 Figure 5-30 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.9 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 35 Figure 5-31 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.10 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 36 Figure 5-32 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.11 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 37 Figure 5-33 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.12 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 38 Figure 5-34 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.13 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 39 Figure 5-35 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.14 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 40 Figure 5-36 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.15 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 41 Figure 5-37 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.16 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 42 Figure 5-38 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.17 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 43 Figure 5-39 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.18 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 44 Figure 5-40 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.19 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 45 Figure 5-41 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.20 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 46 Figure 5-42 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.21 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 47 Figure 5-43 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.22 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 48 Figure 5-44 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.23 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 49 Figure 5-45 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.24 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 50 Figure 5-46 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.25 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 51 Figure 5-47 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.26 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 52 Figure 5-48 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.27 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 53 Figure 5-49 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.28 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 54 Figure 5-50 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.29 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 55 Figure 5-51 Location of Test Borehole Drilling No.30 and Survey Result ...... 5 - 56

Figure 6-1 Location Map of the Test Borehole Drilling Survey ...... 6 - 1 Figure 6-2 Schematic Diagram of Well Structure ...... 6 - 3 Figure 6-3 Flow Chart of Drilling Work ...... 6 - 4 Figure 6-4 Result of the Loggings in No. 3 Bubutole ...... 6 - 8 Figure 6-5 Result of the Loggings in No. 4 Loo ...... 6 - 8 Figure 6-6 Result of Pumping Test (Kongogo) ...... 6 - 25 Figure 6-7 Result of Pumping Test (Bubutole) ...... 6 - 26 Figure 6-8 Result of Pumping Test (Loo) ...... 6 - 26 Figure 6-9 Result of Pumping Test (Nholi) ...... 6 - 27 Figure 6-10 Result of Pumping Test (Barmi/Seloto) ...... 6 - 27 Figure 6-11 Result of Pumping Test (Ikasi) ...... 6 - 28 Figure 6-12 Result of Pumping Test (Hirbadaw) ...... 6 - 28 Figure 6-13 Result of Pumping Test (Tlawi) ...... 6 - 29 Figure 6-14 Result of Pumping Test (Misingi) ...... 6 - 29 Figure 6-15 Result of Pumping Test (Sepuka) ...... 6 - 30 Figure 6-16 Result of Pumping Test (Nkongwa) ...... 6 - 30 Figure 6-17 Result of Pumping Test (Magugu) ...... 6 - 31 Figure 6-18 Result of Pumping Test (Makame) ...... 6 - 31 Figure 6-19 Result of Pumping Test (Ngofila) ...... 6 - 32 Figure 6-20 Result of Pumping Test (Mwasayi) ...... 6 - 32 Figure 6-21 Result of Pumping Test (Loliondo) ...... 6 - 33 Figure 6-22 Result of Pumping Test (Uwiro) ...... 6 - 33

Figure 7-1 Distribution of Water Sources in Water Quality Survey ...... 7 - 3 Figure 7-2 Simplified Water Quality Survey on Site ...... 7 - 4 Figure 7-3 Distribution of Survey Points for Simplified Water Quality Test ...... 7 - 6 Figure 7-4 Treatment Processes before Laboratory Test ...... 7 - 8 Figure 7-5 Water Sampling Locations for Laboratory Test of Water Quality ...... 7 - 10 Figure 7-6 Distribution of F in the Surface Water in IDB ...... 7 - 13 Figure 7-7 Distribution of EC in the Surface Water in IDB ...... 7 - 13 Figure 7-8 Distribution of pH in the Surface Water in IDB ...... 7 - 14 Figure 7-9 Trilinear Diagram of Surface Water in IDB ...... 7 - 15 Figure 7-10 Distribution of Fluoride Concentration in Shallow Groundwater in IDB ...... 7 - 17 Figure 7-11 Distribution of EC in Shallow Groundwater in IDB ...... 7 - 17 Figure 7-12 Distribution of pH in Shallow Groundwater in IDB ...... 7 - 18 Figure 7-13 Trilinear Diagram of Shallow Groundwater in ID ...... 7 - 19 Figure 7-14 Distribution of Fluoride Concentration in Deep Groundwater in IDB ...... 7 - 21 Figure 7-15 Distribution of EC in Deep Groundwater in IDB ...... 7 - 21 Figure 7-16 Distribution of pH in Deep Groundwater in IDB ...... 7 - 22 Figure 7-17 Trilinear Diagram of Deep Groundwater in IDB ...... 7 - 23

Figure 7-18 Distribution of NO3 and NH4 in Dry Season in IDB ...... 7 - 26 Figure 7-19 Distribution of Fe and Mn in Dry Season in IDB ...... 7 - 26 Figure 7-20 Compliance to the standards for drinking water ...... 7 - 27 Figure 7-21 Hexa Diagram in Existing Water Sources in the Whole Basin ...... 7 - 30 Figure 7-22 Hexa Diagram in Existing Water Sources in Sub Basin A ...... 7 - 31 Figure 7-23 Mechanism of Formation of High-F- Groundwater in South India ...... 7 - 32 Figure 7-24 Relationship between Fluoride and Other Water Quality Items in Deep Groundwater (Borehole Wells) in Sub-basin A ...... 7 - 33

Figure 8-1 Symptoms of Dental Fluorosis ...... 8 - 2 Figure 8-2 Symptoms of Skeletal Fluorosis ...... 8 - 3 Figure 8-3 Symptoms of Crippling Fluorosis ...... 8 - 4 Figure 8-4 Percentage Distribution of Fluorosis Cases among Age Groups in Maji ya Chai Village, Arusha Region ...... 8 - 4 Figure 8-5 Typical Operational Run at Gilabend Arizona, USA using Activated Alumina Media ...... 8 - 5 Figure 8-6 Occurrence of Water-related Diseases for Out-patients Aged below 5 Years ... 8 - 14 Figure 8-7 Occurrences of Water-related Diseases for Out-patients Aged above 5 Years .. 8 - 15 Figure 8-8 Occurrences of Water-related Diseases for Admitted Patients Aged below 5 Years ...... 8 - 15 Figure 8-9 Occurrences of Water-related Diseases for Admitted Patients Aged above 5 Years 8 - 16 Figure 8-10 Proportion of Children with TFI > 4 by District ...... 8 - 29 Figure 8-11 Mean TFI by District ...... 8 - 30 Figure 8-12 Relationship between Fluoride and TF Index ...... 8 - 32 Figure 8-13 Distribution of Mean TFI by Dental Survey Examination and Fluoride Levels in Water ...... 8 - 33

Figure 9-1 Rural Water Supply Ratio by District in IDB ...... 9 - 6 Figure 9-2 Water Source Type of each Region ...... 9 - 7 Figure 9-3 Distribution map of Surveyed Points for Existing Water Supply Facilities Inventory Survey ...... 9 - 9 Figure 9-4 Drilling Depth Distribution Based on Inventory Survey ...... 9 - 11 Figure 9-5 Static Water Level Distribution in IDB ...... 9 - 12 Figure 9-6 Distribution of the Altitude of Static Water Level ...... 9 - 20 Figure 9-7 Hexa-diagram of water quality in IDB ...... 9 - 21 Figure 9-8 Groundwater Flow Direction Map ...... 9 - 23 Figure 9-9 Well Yield Distribution of Existing Wells ...... 9 - 24 Figure 9-10 Groundwater Productivity Classification for Hydrogeological Map ...... 9 - 26 Figure 9-11 Hydrogeological Map of Internal Drainage Basin ...... 9 - 30 Figure 9-12 Correlation between EC and TDS ...... 9 - 32 Figure 9-13 Distribution Maps of Each Parameter for Groundwater Potential Evaluation ... 9 - 34 Figure 9-14 Case-1: Groundwater Potential Evaluation (Basic) ...... 9 - 36 Figure 9-15 Case-2: Groundwater Potential Evaluation (Basic + Infiltration) ...... 9 - 36 Figure 9-16 Case-3: Groundwater Potential Evaluation (Basic, 2 X Fluorides) ...... 9 - 37 Figure 9-17 Case-4: Groundwater Potential Evaluation (Case-2 + Population Density) ...... 9 - 37 Figure 9-18 Case-5: Groundwater Potential Evaluation (Case-4 + Water Supply Ratio) ..... 9 - 38 Figure 10-1 Location Map of Socioeconomic Survey Points (Village and Household Survey) ...... 10- 21 Figure 10-2 Structure of Respondents ...... 10- 22 Figure 10-3 Distribution of Village Population ...... 10- 22 Figure 10-4 Dwelling Condition ...... 10- 23 Figure 10-5 Accessibility of Village to Main Road ...... 10- 24 Figure 10-6 Power Supply Condition ...... 10- 24 Figure 10-7 Telecommunication Condition ...... 10- 24 Figure 10-8 Main Economic Activity in Villages ...... 10- 25 Figure 10-9 Main Economic Activity of Households ...... 10- 25 Figure 10-10 Profitability of Each Economic Activity ...... 10- 26 Figure 10-11 Annual Expenditure of Each Item ...... 10- 26 Figure 10-12 Main Water Source in Villages ...... 10- 27 Figure 10-13 Water Usage by Source Type ...... 10- 27 Figure 10-14 Satisfaction Level of Water Sources (Water Quality) ...... 10- 28 Figure 10-15 Satisfaction Level of Water Sources (Water Quantity) ...... 10- 28 Figure 10-16 Person in Charge for Fetching Water ...... 10- 30 Figure 10-17 Fetching Water Time ...... 10- 30 Figure 10-18 Water Container ...... 10- 31 Figure 10-19 Carrying Water ...... 10- 31 Figure 10-20 Water Consumption in Family ...... 10- 31 Figure 10-21 Problem of Water Related Issue ...... 10- 31 Figure 10-22 Reason for Unorganizing WUG/WUA (Village Leader) ...... 10- 33 Figure 10-23 Reason for Unorganizing WUG/WUA (Villager) ...... 10- 33 Figure 10-24 Initial Cost for Construction of Existing Water Supply Facility ...... 10- 33 Figure 10-25 O&M Cost for Existing Water Supply Facility ...... 10- 34 Figure 10-26 Reason for Non-activated WUG/WUA ...... 10- 34 Figure 10-27 Frequency of Payment for O&M Cost ...... 10- 35 Figure 10-28 Person in Charge for Collection and Reserving Money of O&M Cost ...... 10- 35 Figure 10-29 Participation of WUG/WUA Activity ...... 10- 36 Figure 10-30 Participation Way of WUG/WUA ...... 10- 36 Figure 10-31 Reason for Non-participation to WUG/WUA ...... 10- 36 Figure 10-32 Necessity of WUG/WUA ...... 10- 36 Figure 10-33 Receiving Service for Sensitization ...... 10- 36 Figure 10-34 Water Borne Diseases in Family ...... 10- 37 Figure 10-35 Cause of Diseases ...... 10- 37 Figure 10-36 Ideal Place of Treatment for Diseases ...... 10- 38 Figure 10-37 Real Way of Treatment for Diseases ...... 10- 38 Figure 10-38 Ratio of Latrine in Households ...... 10- 38 Figure 10-39 Frequency of Cleaning Latrine ...... 10- 38 Figure 10-40 Customs of Washing Hands ...... 10- 39 Figure 10-41 Tool for Washing Hands ...... 10- 39 Figure 10-42 Frequency of Cleaning Water Containers ...... 10- 39 Figure 10-43 Treatment of Water Before Drinking ...... 10- 39 Figure 10-44 Knowledge of Fluoride Proble ...... 10- 40 Figure 10-45 Using Magadi ...... 10- 41

Figure 11-1 New Organization Structure of MoW ...... 11- 3 Figure 11-2 Present Institutional Framework of Water Resources Management ...... 11- 4 Figure 11-3 Organizational Chart of IDBWO ...... 11- 5 Figure 11-4 Revised Organizational Chart of IDBWO ...... 11- 13 Figure 11-5 Organizational Framework for IDBWO ...... 11- 17 Figure 11-6 Water Right Fee Collection System with Bank Transfer System ...... 11- 19 Figure 11-7 Tentative Flow Chart of Data Collection from Related Other Organizations .... 11- 19 Figure 11-8 Tentative Flow Chart of Data Collection from Monitoring Borehole ...... 11- 20

Figure 13-1 Acquisition of Topographic Map...... 13- 2 Figure 13-2 Acquisition of Geological Map...... 13- 3 Figure 13-3 Entity Relationship Diagram of MoWLD Data Bank...... 13- 7 Figure 13-4 Entity Relationship Diagram of RWSSP-WADATA ...... 13- 8 Figure 13-5 Interface of MAJI-MIS ...... 13- 9 Figure 13-6 EA Population Research Sheet ...... 13- 10 Figure 13-7 UTM zone in Internal Drainage Basin...... 13- 11 Figure 13-8 Developing Administrative Boundary ...... 13- 12 Figure 13-9 Developed Geological Feature from Geological Maps...... 13- 13 Figure 13-10 Developed Main Road and Railway GIS Data from 1/250,000 Topographic Maps13- 14 Figure 13-11 Developed Forest Reserved Area from Administrative Maps ...... 13- 15 Figure 13-12 No Relationship and Attribute Table in GIS...... 13- 17 Figure 13-13 Cooperative Work through OJT...... 13- 18 Figure 13-14 Developed Village Boundary and Point (Centroid) Intersect Basin ...... 13- 19 Figure 13-15 Developed Village Boundary and Basin (Shinyanga Rural)...... 13- 20 Figure 13-16 Estimated Population Calculated by GIS using Village Data...... 13- 21 Figure 13-17 GIS Visualization with Considering Major Faults...... 13- 22 Figure 13-18 Image of IDB GIS/Database Management ...... 13- 23 Figure 13-19 IDB_DB Components...... 13- 24 Figure 13-20 IDB_DBMS Menu (User Interface)...... 13- 33 Figure 13-21 Water Resource Data Management: Input Form ...... 13- 34 Figure 13-22 Water Quality Data Management: Input Form ...... 13- 35 Figure 13-23 Hydrometric Data Management: Input Form...... 13- 35 Figure 13-24 Administrative Data Management (Village): Input Form...... 13- 36 Figure 13-25 Water User Fee Management: Input Form...... 13- 36 Figure 13-26 IDB_DBMS Entity Relationship Diagram...... 13- 38

Figure 14-1 The Phytochoria of Internal Drainage Basin...... 14 - 10 Figure 14-2 The Ecological Zones of the Internal Drainage Basin ...... 14 - 10 Figure 14-3 Main Reserved Areas in Internal Drainage Basin...... 14 - 13 ABBREVIATION

ADM Administrative As Arsenic (mg/L) ASTER Advanced Space borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer B.H. Borehole BSF Belgium Survival Fund BWB Basin Water Board C/P Counter Part CFI Community Fluorosis Index DB DataBase DBMS DataBase Management System DC District Council DDCA Drilling and Dam Construction Agency DECE Environmental Compliance and Enforcement DEIA Directorate of Environmental Impact Assessment DEICO Directorate of Environmental Information, Communication and Outreach DEM Digital Elevation Model DEPR Directorate of Environmental Planning and Research DWE District Water Engineer DWL Dynamic Water Level (m) EA Enumeration Area EC Electric Conductivity (mS/m) EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIS Environmental Impact Statement ERSDAC Earth Remote Sensing Data Analysis Center ETM Enhansed Thematic Mapper F Fluoride (mg/L) Fe Iron (mg/L) FK Foreign Key GDP Gross Domestic Product GIS Geographic Information System GPS Global Positioning System GTZ Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit IDB Internal Drainage Basin IDB Office Water Basin Office of Internal Drainage Basin IDBWO Internal Drainage Basin Water Ofiice IEE Initial Environmental Examination IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IMR Infant Mortality Rate IVS Inventory Survey JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency LANDSAT Land sensing Satellite LUT Look Up Table MC Municipal Council Mn Manganese (mg/L) MoF Ministry of Finance MOFA Ministry of Food security Agriculture MoLD Ministry of Livestock Development MoW Ministry of Water MoWLD Ministry of Water and Livestock Development MS MicroSoft MWE Municipal Water Engineer NAWAPO National Water Policy NBS National Bureau of Statistics NEMC National Environment Management Council NGO Non Government Organization NH4 Ammonia Ion (mg/L) NO3 Nitrate Ion (mg/L) NSGRP National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty O&M Operation & Maintenance OJT On the Job Training ORP Oxidation Reduction Potential (mV) OST Organization Strengthening Team PK Primary Key PMO-RALG Prime Minister's Officer - Regional Administration and Local Government PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper RAS Regional Administrative Secretariat RCU Regional Consultancy Unit RWE Regional Water Engineer RWSSP Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Programme S Sulphate Ion (mg/L) SAVI Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index SEMA Sustainable Environment Management Action SMD Surveys and Mapping Division SRTM Shuttle Rader Topography Mission SWL Static Water Level (m) TANESCO Tanzania Electric Supply Company TAZARA Tanzania and Zambia Railways TCRS Tanzanian Children's Refugee Service TFI Thylstrup and Fejerskov Index TOR Terms of Reference TPDC Tanzanian Petroleum Development Corporation TPTC Tanzanian Posts and Telecommunication TRC Tanzania Railways Corporation TTCL Tanzanian Telecommunication Company Ltd. TWA Technical Water Advisor U5MR Under Five Mortality Rate UNCSD United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UTM Universal Transverse Mercator VEO Village Executive Officer VES Vertical Electrical Sounding VSW Vegetation-Soil-Water WFP World Food Program WGS World Geodetic System WHO World Health Organization WQS Water Quality Survey WRD Water Resources Division WUA Water User Association WUC Water User Committee WUG Water User Group CChhaapptteerr 11 Meteorology and Hydrology The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

CHAPTER 1 METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOGY Meteorological and hydrological data such as temperature, rainfall, sunshine hours, evaporation humidity, wind speed, and river discharge have been collected and analyzed. The results are described below. These data are used for a water balance analyses in IDB.

1.1 Purpose of Survey The meteorological and hydrological study consists of data collection, the analysis, and river flow discharge measurement. The study was carried out to obtain the following information and to be used for water balance analyses. x Meteorological condition of IDB. x Hydrological condition of IDB

1.2 Meteorology

1.2.1 Meteorological Network Figure 2-1 shows the distribution of the meteorological stations operated by Tanzania Meteorological Agency and the rainfall stations where data collected in and adjacent to IDB. The numbers of the stations are a few by comparison with the largeness of IDB. The monthly records on rainfall, air temperature, sunshine hour, relative humidity, pan evaporation, and wind-run are available at the meteorological stations. The covering period of those weather data is since 1975 to 2004 (30 years).

Figure 1-1 Current Weather Stations in IDB and its Adjacent Area

1-1 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

1.2.2 Meteorological Data Analysis (1) Air Temperature Air temperature of the several stations in IDB was analyzed as Figure 1-2. This figure presents average maximum and minimum temperatures at major meteorological stations in IDB or its adjacent area. Annual variation and difference of maximum temperature among the stations is larger than those of minimum temperature. The distribution pattern of Tabora is different from others.

㪋㪇㪅㪇 㪋㪇㪅㪇

㪊㪌㪅㪇 㪊㪌㪅㪇

㪊㪇㪅㪇 㪊㪇㪅㪇

㪉㪌㪅㪇 㪉㪌㪅㪇

㪉㪇㪅㪇 㪉㪇㪅㪇 㪛㪼㪾㫉㪼㪼 㪛㪼㪾㫉㪼㪼

㪈㪌㪅㪇 㪈㪌㪅㪇

㪈㪇㪅㪇 㪈㪇㪅㪇

㪌㪅㪇 㪌㪅㪇

㪇㪅㪇 㪇㪅㪇 㫁㪸㫅 㪽㪼㪹 㫄㪸㫉 㪸㫇㫉 㫄㪸㫐 㫁㫌㫅 㫁㫌㫃 㪸㫌㪾 㫊㪼㫇 㫆㪺㫋 㫅㫆㫍 㪻㪼㪺 㫁㪸㫅 㪽㪼㪹 㫄㪸㫉 㪸㫇㫉 㫄㪸㫐 㫁㫌㫅 㫁㫌㫃 㪸㫌㪾 㫊㪼㫇 㫆㪺㫋 㫅㫆㫍 㪻㪼㪺

㪘㫉㫌㫊㪿㪸㩷㪤㪼㫋㪼㫆㫃㫆㪾㫀㪺㪸㫃 㪉㪏㪅㪋㩷㪉㪐㪅㪈㩷㪉㪏㪅㪉㩷㪉㪌㪅㪌㩷㪉㪊㪅㪉㩷㪉㪉㪅㪈㩷㪉㪉㪅㪇㩷㪉㪊㪅㪈㩷㪉㪌㪅㪍㩷㪉㪎㪅㪌㩷㪉㪎㪅㪋㩷㪉㪎㪅㪎㩷 㪘㫉㫌㫊㪿㪸㩷㪤㪼㫋㪼㫆㫃㫆㪾㫀㪺㪸㫃 㪈㪋㪅㪈㩷㪈㪋㪅㪊㩷㪈㪌㪅㪍㩷㪈㪍㪅㪍㩷㪈㪌㪅㪍㩷㪈㪊㪅㪌㩷㪈㪉㪅㪎㩷㪈㪉㪅㪐㩷㪈㪊㪅㪉㩷㪈㪋㪅㪉㩷㪈㪌㪅㪈㩷㪈㪋㪅㪐㩷 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅 㪫㪸㪹㫆㫉㪸㩷㪤㪼㫋㪼㫆㫃㫆㪾㫀㪺㪸㫃 㪉㪏㪅㪋㩷㪉㪏㪅㪐㩷㪉㪐㪅㪊㩷㪉㪐㪅㪇㩷㪉㪐㪅㪉㩷㪉㪐㪅㪋㩷㪉㪐㪅㪌㩷㪊㪇㪅㪍㩷㪊㪉㪅㪇㩷㪊㪉㪅㪋㩷㪊㪇㪅㪎㩷㪉㪏㪅㪏㩷 㪫㪸㪹㫆㫉㪸㩷㪤㪼㫋㪼㫆㫃㫆㪾㫀㪺㪸㫃 㪈㪎㪅㪏㩷㪈㪎㪅㪍㩷㪈㪎㪅㪎㩷㪈㪎㪅㪊㩷㪈㪍㪅㪇㩷㪈㪋㪅㪊㩷㪈㪋㪅㪊㩷㪈㪍㪅㪊㩷㪈㪏㪅㪇㩷㪈㪐㪅㪇㩷㪈㪏㪅㪎㩷㪈㪏㪅㪊㩷 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅 㪛㫆㪻㫆㫄㪸㩷㪤㪼㫋㪼㫆㫃㫆㪾㫀㪺㪸㫃 㪉㪐㪅㪉㩷㪉㪐㪅㪌㩷㪉㪐㪅㪋㩷㪉㪏㪅㪍㩷㪉㪏㪅㪇㩷㪉㪎㪅㪇㩷㪉㪍㪅㪊㩷㪉㪎㪅㪉㩷㪉㪏㪅㪐㩷㪊㪇㪅㪌㩷㪊㪈㪅㪉㩷㪊㪇㪅㪊㩷 㪛㫆㪻㫆㫄㪸㩷㪤㪼㫋㪼㫆㫃㫆㪾㫀㪺㪸㫃 㪈㪏㪅㪎㩷㪈㪏㪅㪎㩷㪈㪏㪅㪌㩷㪈㪏㪅㪇㩷㪈㪍㪅㪍㩷㪈㪊㪅㪐㩷㪈㪊㪅㪎㩷㪈㪋㪅㪊㩷㪈㪌㪅㪋㩷㪈㪍㪅㪐㩷㪈㪏㪅㪊㩷㪈㪏㪅㪐㩷 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅 㪪㪸㫄㪼㩷㪤㪼㫋㪼㫆㫃㫆㪾㫀㪺㪸㫃 㪊㪈㪅㪊㩷㪊㪉㪅㪋㩷㪊㪈㪅㪏㩷㪉㪏㪅㪐㩷㪉㪍㪅㪎㩷㪉㪍㪅㪇㩷㪉㪌㪅㪍㩷㪉㪍㪅㪋㩷㪉㪏㪅㪊㩷㪊㪇㪅㪇㩷㪊㪇㪅㪎㩷㪊㪇㪅㪋㩷 㪪㪸㫄㪼㩷㪤㪼㫋㪼㫆㫃㫆㪾㫀㪺㪸㫃 㪈㪐㪅㪈㩷㪈㪐㪅㪉㩷㪈㪐㪅㪌㩷㪈㪏㪅㪊㩷㪈㪎㪅㪍㩷㪈㪌㪅㪌㩷㪈㪌㪅㪈㩷㪈㪌㪅㪉㩷㪈㪌㪅㪐㩷㪈㪎㪅㪊㩷㪈㪏㪅㪈㩷㪈㪏㪅㪎㩷 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅 㪢㫀㫃㫀㫄㪸㫅㫁㪸㫉㫆㩷㪘㫀㫉㫇㫆㫉㫋 㪊㪉㪅㪍㩷㪊㪊㪅㪋㩷㪊㪉㪅㪍㩷㪉㪐㪅㪍㩷㪉㪎㪅㪈㩷㪉㪌㪅㪐㩷㪉㪌㪅㪏㩷㪉㪍㪅㪎㩷㪉㪐㪅㪊㩷㪊㪈㪅㪈㩷㪊㪈㪅㪏㩷㪊㪈㪅㪐㩷 㪢㫀㫃㫀㫄㪸㫅㫁㪸㫉㫆㩷㪘㫀㫉㫇㫆㫉㫋 㪈㪎㪅㪐㩷㪈㪏㪅㪈㩷㪈㪐㪅㪉㩷㪈㪐㪅㪌㩷㪈㪏㪅㪊㩷㪈㪌㪅㪍㩷㪈㪋㪅㪋㩷㪈㪋㪅㪎㩷㪈㪌㪅㪊㩷㪈㪎㪅㪇㩷㪈㪏㪅㪋㩷㪈㪏㪅㪋㩷 㪤㫆㫊㪿㫀㩷㪤㪼㫋㪼㫆㫃㫆㪾㫀㪺㪸㫃 㪊㪉㪅㪊㩷㪊㪊㪅㪉㩷㪊㪉㪅㪊㩷㪉㪐㪅㪉㩷㪉㪎㪅㪇㩷㪉㪌㪅㪏㩷㪉㪌㪅㪌㩷㪉㪍㪅㪋㩷㪉㪏㪅㪎㩷㪊㪇㪅㪎㩷㪊㪈㪅㪋㩷㪊㪈㪅㪌㩷 㪤㫆㫊㪿㫀㩷㪤㪼㫋㪼㫆㫃㫆㪾㫀㪺㪸㫃 㪈㪏㪅㪉㩷㪈㪏㪅㪋㩷㪈㪐㪅㪊㩷㪈㪐㪅㪌㩷㪈㪏㪅㪍㩷㪈㪎㪅㪉㩷㪈㪍㪅㪉㩷㪈㪍㪅㪉㩷㪈㪍㪅㪌㩷㪈㪎㪅㪌㩷㪈㪏㪅㪌㩷㪈㪏㪅㪋㩷 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅

Figure 1-2 Averaged Maximum and Minimum Temperatures in Major Towns in IDB and its Adjacent Area

(2) Annual Rainfall Annual rainfall distribution as the one of the most important items for water resources analysis needs many data in terms of as much the number of observation points in IDB and as longer their monitoring duration as possible. Since enough rain gauge stations and weather stations have not been operated so far, data from “Summary of Rainfall in Tanzania” (1975): East Africa Community, Nairobi) has been used for the purpose. The results on the annual rainfall distribution are shown as Figure 1-3. The number of rain gauge stations applied for the map is more than 100 and their monitoring duration is more than 30 years. The map indicates that the north-eastern area of IDB surrounding Mt. Kilimanjaro is relatively high rainfall area, but Dodoma area is under the most sever condition, where has rainfall with only 600 mm/year.

1-2 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

Kilimanjaro Airport

SAME

Meteorological WeatherStations Stations

Figure 1-3 Distribution Map of Annual Rainfall in IDB and its Adjacent Area

(3) Seasonal Change of Monthly Rainfall Seasonal change of monthly rainfall of the several weather stations in IDB was analyzed as Figure 1-4. This figure presents average monthly rainfalls at major weather stations in IDB. The rainy season begins in late October or November and finishes in May. There are almost no rainfall from June to September. Monthly variation patterns of rainfall among the stations are divided into two groups, which are Tabora, Dodoma and Singida group and Arusha, Kilimanjaro, Moshi group. The stations of former group are located on hillside, and the rainfall pattern does not have sharp peak of monthly rainfall. On the other hand, the stations of the latter group are located on mountainous area, and the monthly rainfall pattern has sharp peak on April.

1-3 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

㪊㪌㪇

㪊㪇㪇

㪉㪌㪇

㪉㪇㪇

㪩㪸㫀㫅㪽㪸㫃㫃㩷㩿㫄㫄㪀 㪈㪌㪇

㪈㪇㪇

㪌㪇

㪇 MDQ IHE PDU DSU PD\ MXQ MXO DXJ VHS RFW QRY GHF

$UXVKD0HWHRURORJLFDO             6WDWLRQ

7DERUD0HWHRURORJLFDO             6WDWLRQ

'RGRPD0HWHRURORJLFDO             6WDWLRQ

.LOLPDQMDUR$LUSRUW             0RVKL0HWHRURORJLFDO             6WDWLRQ

6LQJLGD0HWHRURORJLFDO             6WDWLRQ

Figure 1-4 Averaged Monthly Rainfall in Major Towns in IDB and its Adjacent Area

(4) Sunshine Duration Sunshine duration of the several stations in IDB was analyzed as Figure 1-5. This figure presents average monthly sunshine duration at major weather stations in IDB. Annual variation patterns of sunshine duration among the stations are divided into two groups, which are Tabora and Dodoma group, and Arusha, Kilimanjaro, Moshi group. The distributions of these two groups show completely opposite tendencies.

㪪㫌㫅㫊㪿㫀㫅㪼㩷㪛㫌㫉㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅 㪈㪉㪅㪇

㪈㪇㪅㪇

㪏㪅㪇

㪍㪅㪇

㪋㪅㪇 㪘㫉㫌㫊㪿㪸㩷㪸㫀㫉㫇㫆㫉㫋 㪫㪸㪹㫆㫉㪸 㪛㫆㪻㫆㫄㪸 㪉㪅㪇 㪢㫀㫃㫀㫄㪸㫅㫁㪸㫉㫆㩷㪸㫀㫉㫇㫆㫉㫋 㪤㫆㫊㪿㫀 㪇㪅㪇 㪘㫍㪼㫉㪸㪾㪼㩷㪪㫌㫅㫊㪿㫀㫅㪼㩷㪛㫌㫉㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅㩷㩿㪿㫆㫌㫉㫊㪆㪻㪸㫐㪀 㪹 㫅 㫋 㪸㫅 㪼 㫇㫉 㫌 㪺 㪡 㪝 㪤㪸㫉 㪘 㪤㪸㫐 㪡 㪡㫌㫃 㪘㫌㪾 㪪㪼㫇 㪦 㪥㫆㫍 㪛㪼㪺 Figure 1-5 Averaged Sunshine Duration in Major Towns in IDB and its Adjacent Area

1-4 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

(5) Potential Evaporation (Pan Evaporation) Pan evaporation of the several stations in IDB was analyzed as Figure 1-6. Figure 1-6 presents monthly average pan evaporation at major weather stations in IDB. Average pan evaporation shows the highest value on October at each station. The highest value was recorded at Shinyanga weather station. The seasonal change of Pan evaporation follows the temperature and the wind-run.

㪧㫆㫋㪼㫅㫋㫀㪸㫃㩷㪜㫍㪸㫇㫆㫉㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅 Kilimanjaro airport 450 Arusha airport Dodoma 400 Moshi 350 Tabora Shinyanga 300

250

200

150

100 3RWHQWLDO(YDSRUDWLRQ PPPRQWK

50 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Figure 1-6 Averaged Pan Evaporation in Major Towns in IDB and its Adjacent Area

(6) Relative Humidity Relative humidity of the several stations in IDB was analyzed as Figure 1-7. The figure presents monthly average relative humidity at 9 A.M. (the left figure) and 3 P.M. (the right figure) at major weather stations in IDB. Average relative humidity at 9 P.M. shows higher value than that at 3 P.M. at each station. Annual variation patterns of relative humidity among the stations are divided into three groups, which are Tabora and Shinyanga group, Dodoma group, and Arusha, Kilimanjaro, Moshi group. Dodoma group has intermediate value between the other two groups.

㪩㪼㫃㪸㫋㫀㫍㪼㩷㪟㫌㫄㫀㪻㫀㫋㫐㩷㪸㫋㩷㪐㪘㪤 㪩㪼㫃㪸㫋㫀㫍㪼㩷㪟㫌㫄㫀㪻㫀㫋㫐㩷㪸㫋㩷㪊㪧㪤

㪈㪇㪇 㪈㪇㪇

㪐㪇 㪘㪩㪬㪪㪟㪘㩷㪘㪠㪩㪧㪦㪩㪫 㪐㪇 㪘㪩㪬㪪㪟㪘㩷㪘㪠㪩㪧㪦㪩㪫

㪏㪇 㪫㪸㪹㫆㫉㪸 㪏㪇 㪫㪸㪹㫆㫉㪸 㪎㪇 㪎㪇 㪪㪿㫀㫅㫐㪸㫅㪾㪸 㪪㪿㫀㫅㫐㪸㫅㪾㪸 㪍㪇 㪍㪇 㪛㫆㪻㫆㫄㪸 㪛㫆㪻㫆㫄㪸 㪌㪇 㪌㪇 㪤㫆㫊㪿㫀 㪤㫆㫊㪿㫀 㪩㪼㫃㪸㫋㫀㫍㪼㩷㪟㫌㫄㫀㪻㫀㫋㫐㩷㩿㩼㪀 㪋㪇 㪩㪼㫃㪸㫋㫀㫍㪼㩷㪟㫌㫄㫀㪻㫀㫋㫐㩷㩿㩼㪀 㪋㪇 㪢㫀㫃㫀㫄㪸㫅㫁㪸㫉㫆㩷㪠㫅㫋㪼㫉㪅 㪢㫀㫃㫀㫄㪸㫅㫁㪸㫉㫆㩷㪠㫅㫋㪼㫉㪅 㪊㪇 㪘㫀㫉㫇㫆㫉㫋 㪊㪇 㪘㫀㫉㫇㫆㫉㫋

㪉㪇 㪉㪇

㪩 㪣 㪧 㪥 㪰 㪥 㪣 㪞 㪧 㪫 㪘㪥 㪧 㪚㪫 㪚 㪦㪭 㪡 㪝㪜㪙 㪤㪘㪩 㪘 㪤㪘㪰 㪡㪬㪥 㪡㪬 㪘㪬㪞 㪪㪜 㪦 㪥㪦㪭 㪛㪜㪚 㪡㪘 㪝㪜㪙 㪤㪘㪩 㪘㪧㪩 㪤㪘 㪡㪬 㪡㪬 㪘㪬 㪪㪜 㪦 㪥 㪛㪜㪚 Figure 1-7 Averaged Relative Humidity in Major Towns in IDB and its Adjacent Area

1-5 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

(7) Wind-run Wind-run of the several stations in IDB was analyzed as Figure 1-8. The figure presents the yearly average of appearance frequency of the wind directions at major weather stations in IDB. The appearance frequency of the wind from the east predominated except Shinyanga station.

㪢㫀㫃㫀㫄㪸㫅㫁㪸㫉㫆㩷㪸㫀㫉㫇㫆㫉㫋䇭㪈㪉㪑㪇㪇 㪤㫆㫊㪿㫀䇭㪈㪉㪑㪇㪇

㪥 㪥 㪥㪥㪮 㪌㪇㪅㪇 㪥㪥㪜 㪥㪥㪮 㪌㪇㪅㪇 㪥㪥㪜 㪋㪇㪅㪇 㪋㪇㪅㪇 㪥㪮 㪥㪜 㪥㪮 㪥㪜 㪊㪇㪅㪇 㪊㪇㪅㪇 㪮㪥㪮 㪉㪇㪅㪇 㪜㪥㪜 㪮㪥㪮 㪉㪇㪅㪇 㪜㪥㪜 㪈㪇㪅㪇 㪈㪇㪅㪇 㪮 㪇㪅㪇 㪜 㪮 㪇㪅㪇 㪜

㪮㪪㪮 㪜㪪㪜 㪮㪪㪮 㪜㪪㪜

㪪㪮 㪪㪜 㪪㪮 㪪㪜 㪪㪪㪮 㪪㪪㪜 㪪㪪㪮 㪪㪪㪜 㪪 㪪

㪪㪿㫀㫅㫐㪸㫅㪾㪸䇭㪈㪉㪑㪇㪇 㪘㫉㫌㫊㪿㪸䇭㪈㪉㪑㪇㪇

㪥 㪥 㪌㪇㪅㪇 㪌㪇㪅㪇 㪥㪥㪮 㪥㪥㪜 㪥㪥㪮 㪥㪥㪜 㪋㪇㪅㪇 㪋㪇㪅㪇 㪥㪮 㪥㪜 㪥㪮 㪥㪜 㪊㪇㪅㪇 㪊㪇㪅㪇 㪮㪥㪮 㪉㪇㪅㪇 㪜㪥㪜 㪮㪥㪮 㪉㪇㪅㪇 㪜㪥㪜 㪈㪇㪅㪇 㪈㪇㪅㪇 㪮 㪇㪅㪇 㪜 㪮 㪇㪅㪇 㪜

㪮㪪㪮 㪜㪪㪜 㪮㪪㪮 㪜㪪㪜

㪪㪮 㪪㪜 㪪㪮 㪪㪜 㪪㪪㪮 㪪㪪㪜 㪪㪪㪮 㪪㪪㪜 㪪 㪪

㪫㪸㪹㫆㫉㪸䇭㪈㪉㪑㪇㪇 㪛㫆㪻㫆㫄㪸䇭㪈㪉㪑㪇㪇

㪥 㪥 㪥㪥㪮 㪌㪇㪅㪇 㪥㪥㪜 㪥㪥㪮 㪌㪇㪅㪇 㪥㪥㪜 㪋㪇㪅㪇 㪋㪇㪅㪇 㪥㪮 㪥㪜 㪥㪮 㪥㪜 㪊㪇㪅㪇 㪊㪇㪅㪇 㪮㪥㪮 㪉㪇㪅㪇 㪜㪥㪜 㪮㪥㪮 㪉㪇㪅㪇 㪜㪥㪜 㪈㪇㪅㪇 㪈㪇㪅㪇 㪮 㪇㪅㪇 㪜 㪮 㪇㪅㪇 㪜

㪮㪪㪮 㪜㪪㪜 㪮㪪㪮 㪜㪪㪜

㪪㪮 㪪㪜 㪪㪮 㪪㪜

㪪㪪㪮 㪪㪪㪜 㪪㪪㪮 㪪㪪㪜 㪪 㪪

Figure 1-8 Wind Rose in IDB and its Adjacent Area

1-6 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

1.3 Hydrology

1.3.1 River Network River network was generated newly by using DEM (Digital Elevation Model) data and river catchments (Sub-basins) were also defined by SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission) data as illustrated in the Figure 1-9. The areas of each sub-basin are shown in Table 1-1. According to this analysis, it reveals that several sub-basins should not be included in IDB but in the neighboring basins, namely “J” sub-basin belongs to the Pangani Basin, “K” and “L” sub-basins belong to the Wami Basin. “I” sub-basin is considered to be an international sub-basin itself. Approximately 35% of the international sub-basin is located in Kenya. “E” sub-basin is also an international one; it has “Lake Natron”, the whole sub-basin area is considerably big such as 26,224 km2, Tanzanian side of it is 33%. On the basis of the existing definition of IDB, its area is 152,146 km2; however, an area of the newly defined basin becomes 143,099 km2 as shown in Table 1-1.

Figure 1-9 Sub-basins, River Network and Hydrometric Gauging Stations in the Internal Drainage Basin

1-7 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

Table 1-1 Area of Sub-basins in the Internal Drainage Basin Internal Drainage Sub-CatchmentSub-Basin Area Tanzanian Side Kenyan Side Note Basin A 64,545 64,545 - 64,545 Lake Eyasi Sub-basin B 4,115 4,115 - 4,115 Monduli Sub-basin (1) C 1,385 1,385 - 1,385 Monduli Sub-basin (2) D 18,491 18,491 - 18,491 Lake Manyara Sub-basin Lake Natron Sub -basin E 26,224 8,658 17,566 8,658 Flowing out to Kenya F 4,577 4,577 - 4,577 Olduvai Sub-basin G 26,445 26,445 - 26,445 Bahi (Manyoni) Sub-basin H 9,313 9,313 - 9,313 Masai Steppe Sub-basin I 14,080 5,570 2,939 5,570 Namanga Sub-basin (Internal) J 7,122 7,122 - - Belong to Pangani Basin K 1,018 1,018 - - Belong to Wami Basin L 907 907 - - Belong to Wami Basin Total 178,221 152,146 20,505 143,099 - Unit : Km2

1.3.2 River Regime (1) Flow Regime Flow duration curves of the hydrometric gauging stations in the Tanzania were analyzed as Figure 1-10. Flow duration curves in IDB (Lake Eyasi sub-basin and Bahi sub-basin) show shorter flow discharge periods in a year and rapid discharge like a flash for each rainfall event compared with those in the other areas of Tanzania. This means that a lot of rivers in IDB are ephemeral rivers and unstable for water use. In comparison with the observation periods of the collected data on river flow discharge, there is the largest number of hydrometric observation data at year of 1974. Therefore the monthly averaged river flow discharges at various stations at the year of 1974 in IDB were analyzed as Figure 1-11. All observation results have almost the same tendency that the river flow discharge gradually increases from December, records the maximum value on April, and then decrease and disappears on June or July. It corresponds to the seasonal rainfall condition.

1-8 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

㪣㪸㫂㪼㩷㪜㫐㪸㫊㫀㩷㪪㫌㪹㪄㪹㪸㫊㫀㫅 㪙㪸㪿㫀㩷㪪㫌㪹㪄㪹㪸㫊㫀㫅

㪌㪇㪇 㪌㪇㪇 㪋㪌㪇 㪋㪌㪇 㪋㪇㪇 㪋㪇㪇 㪉㪢㪍㪘 㪉㪩㪈㪘 㪊㪌㪇 㪉㪢㪎 㪊㪌㪇 㪉㪩㪋 㪊㪇㪇 㪉㪢㪈㪈 㪊㪇㪇 㪉㪩㪉㪋 㪉㪌㪇 㪉㪢㪈㪌 㪉㪌㪇 㪉㪩㪉㪌 㪉㪇㪇 㪉㪢㪈㪍 㪉㪇㪇 㪉㪩㪉㪍 㪈㪌㪇 㪉㪢㪉㪇 㪈㪌㪇 㪉㪩㪉㪎 㪉㪢㪋㪇 㪉㪩㪉㪐 㪈㪇㪇 㪈㪇㪇 㪌㪇 㪌㪇 㪝㫃㫆㫎㩷㫀㫅㩷㪧㪸㫉㪺㪼㫅㫋㪸㪾㪼㩷㫆㪽㩷㪤㪼㪸㫅㩷㪝㫃㫆㫎 㪝㫃㫆㫎㩷㫀㫅㩷㪧㪸㫉㪺㪼㫅㫋㪸㪾㪼㩷㫆㪽㩷㪤㪼㪸㫅㩷㪝㫃㫆㫎 㪇 㪇 㪇 㪉㪇㪋㪇㪍㪇㪏㪇㪈㪇㪇 㪇 㪉㪇㪋㪇㪍㪇㪏㪇㪈㪇㪇 㪧㪸㫉㪺㪼㫅㫋㪸㪾㪼㩷㫆㪽㩷㪫㫀㫄㪼㩷㪝㫃㫆㫎㩷㪜㫏㪺㪼㪼㪻㪼㪻㩷㪦㫅㪼㩷㪻㪸㫐 㪧㪸㫉㪺㪼㫅㫋㪸㪾㪼㩷㫆㪽㩷㪫㫀㫄㪼㩷㪝㫃㫆㫎㩷㪜㫏㪺㪼㪼㪻㪼㪻㩷㪦㫅㪼㩷㪻㪸㫐 㪛㫌㫉㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅㩷㪚㫌㫉㫍㪼㫊㩷㪨㫀 㪛㫌㫉㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅㩷㪚㫌㫉㫍㪼㫊㩷㩷㪨㫀

Flow in Percentage of Mean Flow Percentages of Time Flow Exceeded One day Duration Curves Figure 1-10 Flow Duration Curves Source: The Study on the National Irrigation Mater Plan in the United Republic of Tanzania, 2002 November, JICA

)ORZ5HJLPHDW

㪉㪢㪍㪘  㪉㪢㪈㪈  㪉㪢㪈㪌  㪉㪢㪈㪍  㪉㪢㪈㪏  㪉㪢㪉㪇  㪉㪢㪉㪎 㪉㪢㪋㪇  㪉㪢㪋㪈  㪉㪩㪈㪘  㪉㪩㪋 㪉㪩㪉㪊

㪘㫍㪼㫉㪸㪾㪼㩷㪽㫃㫆㫎㩷㪻㫀㫊㪺㪿㪸㫉㪾㪼㩷㩿㫄㪊㪆㫊㪀  㪉㪩㪉㪋  㪉㪩㪉㪌 0RQWK 㪉㪩㪉㪍 㪉㪢㪉㪎

Figure 1-11 Monthly Averaged River Flow Discharges at 1974

1-9 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

(4) Lake Water Level Lake water level of the 2K13 gauging station at the Kitangiri Lake in Lake Eyasi sub-basin was analyzed as Figure 1-12. The figure presents average daily water level at Kitangiri Lake. Annual trend of water level change of the station is that the water level goes up during rainy season and goes down during dry season. The difference of the water level between the beginning and the end of each year corresponds to the change of storage volume in the lake during the corresponding year. For example, the water levels at each June went down from 1979 to 1982. It means that the storage volume of the lake decreased in this period.

㪣㪸㫂㪼㩷㪢㫀㫋㪸㫅㪾㫀㫉㫀㩷㩿㪉㪢㪈㪊㪀

㪌㪅㪇㪇 㪋㪅㪌㪇 㪋㪅㪇㪇 㪊㪅㪌㪇 㪊㪅㪇㪇 㪉㪅㪌㪇 㪉㪅㪇㪇 㪈㪅㪌㪇

㪣㪸㫂㪼㩷㫎㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃㩷㩿㫄㪀 㪈㪅㪇㪇 㪇㪅㪌㪇 㪇㪅㪇㪇 㪈㪐㪎㪏㪆㪍 㪈㪐㪎㪏㪆㪐 㪈㪐㪎㪐㪆㪊 㪈㪐㪎㪐㪆㪍 㪈㪐㪎㪐㪆㪐 㪈㪐㪏㪇㪆㪊 㪈㪐㪏㪇㪆㪍 㪈㪐㪏㪇㪆㪐 㪈㪐㪏㪈㪆㪊 㪈㪐㪏㪈㪆㪍 㪈㪐㪏㪈㪆㪐 㪈㪐㪏㪉㪆㪊 㪈㪐㪏㪉㪆㪍 㪈㪐㪏㪉㪆㪐 㪈㪐㪏㪊㪆㪊 㪈㪐㪏㪊㪆㪍 㪈㪐㪏㪊㪆㪐 㪈㪐㪎㪏㪆㪈㪉 㪈㪐㪎㪐㪆㪈㪉 㪈㪐㪏㪇㪆㪈㪉 㪈㪐㪏㪈㪆㪈㪉 㪈㪐㪏㪉㪆㪈㪉

Figure 1-12 Water Level Change of Lake Kitangiri (2K13)

1.3.3 River Flow Discharge Measurement (1) Purpose The main purpose of the river flow discharge measurements was initially to add new data to the existing rating curves for each hydrometric gauging station, and estimate validities of the existing rating curves. However, our collected information says that suitable river flow discharge measurements for achieving the initial purpose in IDB are very difficult due to the shortest time of the flow discharges like a flashing. Therefore, we set additional purpose that is to provide river flow discharge information to some hydrometric gauging stations now being operated.

1-10 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

(2) Selected Hydrometric Gauging Stations As a result, five (5) hydrometric gauging stations are selected as measurement points. Their name and locations listed in Table 1-2 and are shown in Figure 1-13.

Table 1-2 Selected Hydrometric Stations 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅㩷㪥㫆㪅 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅㩷㪥㪸㫄㪼 㪣㪦㪚㪘㪫㪠㪦㪥 㪣㪘㪫 㪣㪦㪥㪞 㪉㪟㪈㪘 㪢㫀㫉㫌㫉㫌㫄㫆 㪤㫋㫆㩷㫎㪸㩷㪤㪹㫌㩷㪙㫉㪅 㪄㪊㪅㪊㪍㪏㪇㪐 㪊㪌㪅㪏㪋㪇㪋㪋 㪉㪟㪌㪘 㪛㫌㪻㫌㫄㪼㫉㪸 㪢㫀㫉㫌㩷㪩㪻㪅㪙㫉㪅 㪄㪋㪅㪇㪐㪈㪈㪋 㪊㪌㪅㪎㪉㪋㪈㪐 㪉㪢㪍㪘 㪢㫀㫉㫆㫅㪻㪸 㪢㫀㫉㫆㫅㪻㪸㫋㪸㫃 㪄㪋㪅㪊㪎㪏㪎㪍 㪊㪋㪅㪊㪊㪋㪎㪐 㪉㪢㪉㪎 㪫㫌㫅㪾㫌 㪣㫌㪹㪸㪾㪸 㪄㪊㪅㪌㪎㪈㪎㪍 㪊㪊㪅㪎㪏㪈㪉㪌 㪉㪩㪈㪘 㪙㫌㪹㫌 㪝㪸㫉㫂㫎㪸㩷㪩㪻㪅㪙㫉㪅 㪄㪌㪅㪊㪈㪋㪏㪍 㪊㪌㪅㪌㪌㪌㪍㪍

Figure 1-13 Locations of River Flow Discharge Measurement Points

(3) Method of River Flow Discharge Measurement The flow measurement were implemented in compliance with Tanzanian standards, which is shown in “MANUAL ON PROCEDURES IN OPERATIONAL HYDROLOGY, VOLUME 3, STREAM DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS BY CURRENT METER AND RELATIVE SALT DILUTION, 1979”.

1-11 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

(4) Measurement Results The measurement results are shown in below.

Table 1-3 Measurement Results of River Flow Discharge

㪝㫃㫆㫎㩷㪻㫀㫊㪺㪿㪸㫉㪾㪼 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅㩷㪥㫆㪅 㪪㫋㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅㩷㪥㪸㫄㪼 㪛㪸㫋㪼㩷㩽㩷㫋㫀㫄㪼 㪣㪘㪫 㪣㪦㪥㪞 㩿㫄㪊㪆㫊㪀 㪉㪟㪈㪘 㪢㫀㫉㫌㫉㫌㫄㫆 㪈㪅㪇㪊 㪉㪇㪇㪍㪆㪊㪆㪈㪎 㪄㪊㪅㪊㪍㪏㪇㪐 㪊㪌㪅㪏㪋㪇㪋㪋 㪉㪟㪌㪘 㪛㫌㪻㫌㫄㪼㫉㪸 㪈㪅㪈㪉 㪉㪇㪇㪍㪆㪊㪆㪈㪎 㪄㪋㪅㪇㪐㪈㪈㪋 㪊㪌㪅㪎㪉㪋㪈㪐 㪉㪢㪍㪘 㪢㫀㫉㫆㫅㪻㪸 㪇㪅㪌㪍 㪉㪇㪇㪍㪆㪊㪆㪈㪍 㪄㪋㪅㪊㪎㪏㪎㪍 㪊㪋㪅㪊㪊㪋㪎㪐 㪉㪢㪉㪎 㪫㫌㫅㪾㫌 㪇㪅㪇㪌 㪉㪇㪇㪍㪆㪊㪆㪈㪐 㪄㪊㪅㪌㪎㪈㪎㪍 㪊㪊㪅㪎㪏㪈㪉㪌 㪉㪩㪈㪘 㪙㫌㪹㫌 㪇㪅㪉㪇 㪉㪇㪇㪍㪆㪊㪆㪈㪍 㪄㪌㪅㪊㪈㪋㪏㪍 㪊㪌㪅㪌㪌㪌㪍㪍

1.4 Water Use The acquisition of data on actual water use in IDB is difficult because of the lack of systematic data collection system. Therefore the water use was estimated by using information on registered and applied water rights as a trial. The used information was provided by IDBO. The time stamps of the information were from 5 May 2004 to 12 January 2006. The results are shown in Figure 1-14 and Figure 1-15. The perceived tendency from these figures is shown below. (1) Arusha Region The main water resources are river and spring water. The main purpose of the water use is domestic use. There are small water uses for irrigation, livestock and commercials. (2) The main water resource is river water. The main purpose of the water use is domestic use. There are small water uses for irrigation. (3) Dodoma Region In this region, the data obtained is the one for only. The main water resources in Kondoa district are river, dams and borehole water. The main purpose of the water use is domestic use (4) The main water resource is borehole water. The main purpose of the water use is domestic use. There is small water use for livestock. (5) Tabora Region The main water resources are river and dam water. The main purpose of the water use is irrigation and the next is domestic use. There is small water use for mining. (6) Shinyanga Region The main water resource is dam water. The main purpose of the water use is domestic use. There are small water uses for commercials and mining.

1-12 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

㪮㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㪩㫀㪾㪿㫋㩷㩿㪘㫉㫌㫊㪿㪸㩷㪩㪼㪾㫀㫆㫅㪀



 1JURQJRUR  0RQGXOL

 $UXPHUX .DUDWX 

 :DWHU'HPDQG PGD\  㫉㫀㫍㪼㫉 㫊㫇㫉㫀㫅㪾 㫊㫎㪸㫄㫇 㪣㪸㫂㪼 㪻㪸㫄 㪹㫆㫉㪼㪿㫆㫃㪼 㫌㫅㫂㫅㫆㫎㫅

:DWHU5HVRXUFH

㪮㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㪩㫀㪾㪿㫋㩷㩿㪤㪸㫅㫐㪸㫉㪸㩷㪩㪼㪾㫀㫆㫅㪀



 %DEDWL +DQJ  0EXOX  .LWHWR 6LPDQMLUR 

 :DWHU'HPDQG PGD\  㫉㫀㫍㪼㫉 㫊㫇㫉㫀㫅㪾 㫊㫎㪸㫄㫇 㪣㪸㫂㪼 㪻㪸㫄 㪹㫆㫉㪼㪿㫆㫃㪼 㫌㫅㫂㫅㫆㫎㫅

:DWHU5HVRXUFH

㪮㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㪩㫀㪾㪿㫋㩷㩿㪛㫆㪻㫆㫄㪸㩷㪩㪼㪾㫀㫆㫅㪀

    .RQGRD   

:DWHU'HPDQG PGD\   㫉㫀㫍㪼㫉 㫊㫇㫉㫀㫅㪾 㫊㫎㪸㫄㫇 㪣㪸㫂㪼 㪻㪸㫄 㪹㫆㫉㪼㪿㫆㫃㪼 㫌㫅㫂㫅㫆㫎㫅

:DWHU5HVRXUFH

Figure 1-14 Water Use derived from Water Right Information (1)

1-13 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 1 Meteorology and Hydrology

㪮㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㪩㫀㪾㪿㫋㩷㩿㪪㫀㫅㪾㫀㪻㪸㩷㪩㪼㪾㫀㫆㫅㪀

   6LQJLGD  ,UDPED  0DQ\RQL  

:DWHU'HPDQG PGD\   㫉㫀㫍㪼㫉 㫊㫇㫉㫀㫅㪾 㫊㫎㪸㫄㫇 㪣㪸㫂㪼 㪻㪸㫄 㪹㫆㫉㪼㪿㫆㫃㪼 㫌㫅㫂㫅㫆㫎㫅

:DWHU5HVRXUFH

㪮㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㪩㫀㪾㪿㫋㩷㩿㪪㪿㫀㫅㫐㪸㫅㪾㪸㩷㪩㪼㪾㫀㫆㫅㪀

  6KLQ\DQJH  0XQLFLSDOLW\  0HDWX  .LVKDSX  

:DWHU'HPDQG PGD\   㫉㫀㫍㪼㫉 㫊㫇㫉㫀㫅㪾 㫊㫎㪸㫄㫇 㪣㪸㫂㪼 㪻㪸㫄 㪹㫆㫉㪼㪿㫆㫃㪼 㫌㫅㫂㫅㫆㫎㫅

:DWHU5HVRXUFH

㪮㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㪩㫀㪾㪿㫋㩷㩿㪫㪸㪹㫆㫉㪸㩷㪩㪼㪾㫀㫆㫅㪀

   ,JXQJD  1]HJD   

:DWHU'HPDQG PGD\   㫉㫀㫍㪼㫉 㫊㫇㫉㫀㫅㪾 㫊㫎㪸㫄㫇 㪣㪸㫂㪼 㪻㪸㫄 㪹㫆㫉㪼㪿㫆㫃㪼 㫌㫅㫂㫅㫆㫎㫅

:DWHU5HVRXUFH

Figure 1-14 Water Use derived from Water Right Information (2)

1-14 CChhaapptteerr 22 Geomorphology The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 2 Geomorphology

CHAPTER 2 GEOMORPHOLOGY

2.1 Purpose of Survey The objective of the survey is to grasp the geo-morphological characteristics in the study area.

2.2 Survey Area The survey covers the whole study area, that is, the Internal Drainage Basin (IDB). The Study area is located in the eastern side of “East African Rift Valley” (Figure 3-1 in Chapter 3). In the central and northeastern parts of the study area, huge volcanoes such as Mt. Hanang, Kilimanjaro, Ngorongoro crater are situated. These volcanoes and “Basin and Swell” structure are closely related to rift-faulting movements and nine sub-basins in IDB were formed by these topographic and geologic features.

2.3 Methodology of Geomorphologic Analysis

2.3.1 Used Remote Sensing Data Thirteen scenes of LANDSAT ETM data were prepared for this study. Used LANDSAT/ETM+ images are listed up in Table 2-1. Figure 2-1 shows Location of used LANDSAT/ETM+ data. SRTM-DEM (Shuttle Rader Topography Mission-Digital Elevation Model), calculated from radar data acquired by the Space Shuttle Radar System, was used in order to understand topographic features, drainage networks and catchments area. Used SRTM-DEM data covers the study area and is bounded by the following coordinates: 2 㩩 00’- 6 㩩 00’S and 32 㩩 00’- 36 㩩 00’E. SRTM DEM data had been obtained from following website:http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/.

Table 2-1 List of Used LANDSAT/ETM Data No. Path Row Acquisition Date 1 167 63 2001/3/4 2 167 64 2001/1/15 3 168 62 2000/2/21 4 168 63 2000/2/21 5 168 64 2001/3/11 6 168 65 2000/2/21 7 169 61 2000/1/27 8 169 62 2000/2/12 9 169 63 2000/2/12 10 169 64 2000/2/12 11 170 62 2001/5/12 12 170 63 2000/1/18 13 170 64 2000/1/18

2-1 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 2 Geomorphology

Figure 2-1 Location of used LANDSAT/ETM+ data

2.3.2 Data Processing and Analysis (1) SRTM DEM Processing SRTM DEM data was used to generate drainage networks and to extract sub-basin areas based on the following procedure. x To generate drainage networks using drainage direction matrix. x To delineate of sub-basin areas with proper size after the consideration of geomorphologic feature and so forth. These results were described in “1.3 Hydrology”. The SRTM DEM data also used to extract the significant geological structures such as lineaments, faults and warping structure.

2-2 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 2 Geomorphology

(2) LANDSAT ETM Mosaic Image

Figure. 2-2 LANDSAT ETM False Color Image (B, G, R: band1, band4, band5)

Twelve scenes of LANDSAT ETM images were generated using band 1, 4 and 5 of ETM data, assigned to blue, green and red, respectively. This band combination has the advantage of emphasizing the color variations of rocks, soil and vegetation. LANDSAT mosaic image is shown in Figure 2-2.

(3) SAVI (Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index) Image The SAVI image was used to analyze the vegetation density and activity, using LANDSAT ETM band3 and band4. The SAVI considered an influence of soil spectra. The SAVI is defined as by following equation. Band4-Band3 SAVI= *(1+L) Band4+Band3+L

L: non-dimensional correction factor, from 0 to 1.

2-3 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 2 Geomorphology

(4) VSW (Vegetation-Soil-Water Indices) Image The VSW indices show vegetation, soil and water parameters of grand surface. The concept of VSW shows Figure 2-3. The end member spectral points for vegetation, soil and water (VSW) were determined on the digital number diagram using Landsat ETM band3 and band4.

Landsat ETM Band4

Landsat ETM Band3

Figure 2-3 Concept of Vegetation, Soil and Water(VSW) Indices

(5) Land Cover Image The land cover map was produced based on the results of VSW indices and existing data.

2.3.3 Field Survey Based on the results of preliminary interpretation of remote sensing data, a field survey was carried out in order to check the geology and geomorphology. The field survey has revealed following points mainly. ࡮ Distribution area of the Nyanzian System; From Shinyanga to Iramba. ࡮ Boundary of plutonic rocks and metamorphic rocks (USAGARAN System). ࡮ Distribution area of Neogene sediments; Shinyanga, Igunga, Monduli, Kiteto, Dodoma and Singida areas. ࡮ Distribution range of Neogene volcanic rocks; Hanang, Babati, Monduli and Arumeru areas. ࡮ Surface feature of lineaments and faults. ࡮ Vegetation and land use of each area. ࡮ Hot spring; Lake Manyara.

2-4 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 2 Geomorphology

The Locations of field survey points are shown in Figure 2-4. The results of field survey are described “3.4 Results of Field Survey”

Figure2-4 Location of Field Survey Points

2.4 Geomorphologic Characteristics

2.4.1 Topography The topographic image processed SRTM DEM is shown in Figure 2-5. This image shows the elevation by color level slice. On the other hand, Figure 2-6 was prepared by DEM data to understand topographic features of IDB three-dimensionally.

The Study area is located in the eastern side of “East African Rift Valley”. In the central and northeastern parts of the project area, there are huge volcanoes such as Mt. Hanang (EL 3,417m), Kilimanjaro (EL 5,895m) and Ngorongoro crater (EL 2,000-3,000 m). These volcanoes and “Basin and Swell” structure are closely related to rift-faulting movements.

2-5 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 2 Geomorphology

In northern to central part of the study area, several large lakes are located in each sub-basin, such as Lake Natron (EL; about 600m), Lake Manyara (EL; about 950m) and Lake Eyasi (EL; about 1,020m). Bahi swamp is spreading over the low plain in the southern part of IDB.. Many linear fault scarps were found in IDB. In the central part of IDB, the areas bounded by N-S or NE-SW trending fault are gently inclining to the northwest or west. The nine sub-basins in IDB are formed by these topographic and geologic features. There are several hot springs in IDB. In this field survey, one of hot springs was observed at the bottom of the fault scarp in the western margin of Lake Manyara as shown below.

Photographs of Hot Spring near Lake Manyara

2-6 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 2 Geomorphology

Figure 2-5 SRTM DEM Image

2.4.2 Nature of Ground Surface SAVI image and VSW image are shown in Figure 2-6 and Figure 2-7 respectively. During January and February when LANDSAT data were acquired, high vegetation index features the two types of areas. One corresponds to high elevation area (above EL1500-2000m) and the other corresponds to the southwestern part of IDB along railroad (about EL1000-1400m). The latter also corresponds to smooth topographic characteristic area where is covered by thick weathering zone of granitic rocks. VSW image shows that high soil index distributes in the northern part of IDB, high water index distributes in eastern low elevation area. Almost large lakes and swamps in magenta color suggest mixed spectra of soil and water because of shallow water depth. Figure 2-8 shows land cover map that was produced by the results of VSW image and SAVI image.

2-7 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 2 Geomorphology

Q

T

C

L

P

C

O

K

 N

V K

P

/ -

K

C

N

2

K

G P

Q Y

T 㪸 V

V

G K

㪿 C

M - 0 㫊

C

㫌 .

G

C K R [ C R

U G P P

C V G K

/ 5

- C

Q N

C

T T 2

C K

[ L C

P P P V C

C K C

/ 㫀

 O C

M

. K N /

5 2

I

P

C

P

C

K

*

U

C



[

V

'

P

/ K

 U

. C $

G C T

M Q

R 㪸

C C V

. W M

C V

/ 㪻 P

C

㫆 G

K O

R 㫀 R

T

O 㪾 T

Q

C C

V

Y E

㪿 㫅

5 E U

㪸 '

K

K

8 J W

㪾 C H

㫅 $ W

(

㫐 R O

㫅 C

㫀 Y 㪿 5

㪪 G

T

G

D

O

G 9

㪫 Figure 2-6 Three Dimensional Topographic Map of the Internal Drainage Basin Topographic Dimensional Three 2-6 Figure

2-8 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 2 Geomorphology

Figure 2-7 SAVI (Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index) Image

Figure 2-8 VSW Image (V; vegetation, S; Soil, W; Water and Moisture)

2-9 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 2 Geomorphology

Figure 2-9 Land Cover Map.

2-10 CChhaapptteerr 33 Geology The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

CHAPTER 3 GEOLOGY

3.1 General Geology A continental rift zone is running through Ethiopia to Mozambique in the East Africa which is called as “East African Rift Valley” (Figure 3-1). The study area is located at the east branch of it developing in the Tanzanian craton. Many authors have suggested that the eastern and western branches of the East African Rift represent an early stage of continental separation. Figure 3-1 shows distribution of Tertiary and Quaternary volcanic rocks. The eastern branch of the rift valley has wider distribution of volcanic rocks than the western branch. It’s characterized by high rate crystal extension and bimodal distribution of basic and acid magma type. In general, most of continental rift zones accompany high alkali volcanic activity. The faults in the eastern branch of the rift valley appear generally belong to the Neogene. However there’s no evidence that this fault activity happened in Paleogene. In general, the faults discoed from the foliation of Precambrian metamorphic rocks. The general direction of them is N-S with related faults branching to the south-west. This suggests that these activities are regarded as block fault activity bringing tectonic basins.

The second phase of fault activity in association with tilting and warping has dominated the evolution of topography since mid-Tertiary.  The ground surface in the mid-Tertiary was also warped into gentle basin structure. In case of the Internal Drainage Basin, the bottom level of the basins is changing apparently based on their sedimentation. Therefore, the rivers tend to flow along the faults Figure 3-1 Structural Map of East African Rift laterally and wide flood planes are System (Wilson (1989)) developed.

3-1 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

3.2 Geological Description The geological interpretation map and stratigraphy are shown in Figure 3-2 and Table 3-1, respectively. This interpretation map was produced using LANDSAT ETM false colour image (Figure3-2) and published geological maps of Tanzania (1:125,000). Furthermore, VSW indices, SAVI index and SRTM DEM images were also used for the interpretation. This interpretation images at a scale of 1:500,000 was conducted in order to extract lithological and structural characteristics for the hydrogeological analysis. Based on the results of field survey, the interpretation map was confirmed. As the result of interpretation, geological units were classified into 16 units (Table 3-1) and many lineaments and fault structures were extracted

Table 3-1 Stratigraphy of the Study Area

Age System Lithology Unit Unit by LANDSAT Image Interpretation

Aluvial; sand, gravel, silt; N mud. Undifferentiated. Typically alkaline E volcanics: Olivine N: Undiferentiated QUATERNARY Lacustrine; sand, silt, basalt, alkali basalt, NI N NI Nv, E: Evapolite –NEOGINE limestone, tuff phonolite, trachyte, v Nvd Nv: Lave and Pyroclastics (-23.3Ma) Terrestrial: sand, gravel, nephelinenite and Nt - Nvd: Mainly Pyroclastics laterite, silcrete, calcrete. Fluviatile; -marine; pyroclastics. sand;gravel; silt; Nf Nf KAINOZOIC (CENOZOIC) limestone. 㪬㫅㪺㫆㫅㪽㫆㫉㫄㫀㫋㫐

Mudstone; shale and phyllite; sandstone; arkose; BUKOBAN B B - quartzite; conglomerate; limestone. (570-2450Ma) PROTERO-ZOIC Marble; quartzite; graphitic schist; chlorite, Xs Topographic rough texture USAGARAN amphibole, mica and kyanite schist; hornblend Xs Xs-a Topographic intermidiate texture biotite and garnet gneiss; acid gneiss; granulite; Xs-l Topographic smooth texture KAVIRONDIAN Quartzite; phylite. V V - Banded Ironstone; metavolcanics; chlorite schist; NYANZIAN Z Z - pseudo-porphyry. ARCHEAN

(2450-4600Ma) schist; gneiss; quartzite; amphibolite and DODOMAN D D - hornblend gneiss; acid gneiss; migmatite. Plutonic Rocks

Age Lithology Unit Unit by LANDSAT Image Interpretation

Granite and granodiorite, foliated, gneissose or gs Topographic rough texture migmatitic, some massive porphiyroblastic, gs-a Topographic intermediate texture Mainly ARCHEAN gs includes intimately related regional Topographic smooth texture. gs-b migmatite.(Syn-orogenic) Strong weathered granite

3-2 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology Figure 3-2 Geological Map of the Internal Drainage Basin Figure

3-3 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

3.2.1 Precambrian Basement Rocks

(1) Dodoman System (Archean): D The Dodoman system is the oldest formation in Tanzania which consists of schist, gneiss and migmatite. It is distributed around Dodoma town.

(2) Nyanzian System (Archean): Z The Nyanzian system consists of banded ironstone, metavolcanics and chlorite schist. They are distributed in Shinyanga, Nzega, Igunga and Iramba district. Since their surface soil characteristically shows dark reddish brown in colour, this system can be easily distinguished on LANDSAT Images. At the north of Singida town, outcrops of gabbros were observed.

(3) Kavirondian System (Archean): V The Kavirondian system consists of quartzite and phyllite. Outcrops of the rocks are confined at the limited area near Nzega.

(4) Usagaran System (Archean): Xs, Xs-a and Xs-l The Usagaran system consists of marble, schist, gneiss and migmatite. These rocks crop out the large area of the eastern part of the Basin This formation can be classified into three units; “Xs”, “Xs-a” and “Xs-l” based on their topographic features. Some migmatite distributed in “Xs-a” and “Xs-l” units can be delineated on the LANDSAT images.

(5) Bukoban System (Proterozoic): B The Bukoban system consists of sedimentary rocks; mudstone, shale, sandstone, etc. Exposures of the rocks are confirmed at the limited area in the southern part of the Bahi Swamp.

(6) Plutonic Rocks (mainly Archean); gs, gs-a, gs-b and Gr Plutonic rocks consist of granite and granodiorite, gneissose or migmatitic rocks. Plutonic rocks are widely distributed from the central to the western part of the Basin. Plutonic rocks can be classified into three units based on degree of weathering zone analyzed by their topographic features. Unit “gs” widely distributed in almost whole area of plutonic rocks is characterized rough texture on the LANDSAT images and high altitude. Unit “gs-b” distributed along Tanzanian Railroad at

3-4 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

Manyoni to the northwest is characterized very smooth texture. Unit “gs-b” corresponds to the thick weathered zone which are named as “Kilimatinde cement” in the published geological map. Unit “gs-a” has intermediate feature between “gs” and gs-b. Unite “Gr” located near the country border at the north of Arusha forms raise being surrounded by Usagaran system (Xs-l).

3.2.2 Kainozoic (Cenozoic) Formations; N, E, Nf, Nl During late Neogene, lacustrine sediments, terrestrial sediments, fluviatile sediments, marine sediments and alluvial sediments deposited in the lakes and shallow basins formed by the warping of the surface that accompanied rift-faulting movements. These sediments are distributed in the centre of each basin and characterized by low plane in topography. Based on published geological map, these Cenozoic sediments were classified into four units (N, Nl, Nf and E). Since it is very hard to differentiate these units except evaporite in topographic features and also spectral features, their classification was adopted to Figure 3-2.

3.2.3 Volcanic Rocks; Nv, Nvd From the central to the north-western part of the Basin, extensive volcanic activity in association with rift-faulting movements can be seen from Mt. Hanang, Mt. Kilimanjaro and northward into Kenya. These huge volcanic massifs consisting of extensive alkaline lava and pyroclastics are accumulated. These volcanic activities have been continuing in small scale. In general, alkaline type volcanic rocks have high volatile contents such as H2O, CO2, F and so on. Distribution of volcanic lavas and pyroclastics can be delineated on the LANDSAT false colour image. In interpretation map, Cenozoic volcanic rocks are divided into “Nv” and “Nvd”. “Nv” consists of lava and pyroclastic rocks and forms volcano body.

3.3 Geological Structure Distribution map of faults and lineaments is shown in Figure 3-3. A lineament is defined to be “straight and/or semi-curve linear features on the surface, which seems to reflect subsurface geological structures such as fracture. In this study, fault can be distinguished from the presence of step structure along lineament. A large number of lineaments and faults in association with rift-faulting movements were extracted from the almost whole of all the study area. From the eastern to northern part of the Basin, N-S trending lineaments and faults are well developed. From the central to southern areas, a great number of NE-SW and N-S trending lineaments and faults were extracted. In the western area, N-S trending faults can be seen on the image however, lineaments are distributed sparsely and disorderly.

3-5 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

Figure 3-3 Distribution of Faults and Lineaments

3-6 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

3.4 Results of Field Survey Based on the results of preliminary interpretation of remote sensing data, a field survey was carried out in order to check the geology and geomorphology. The field survey has revealed following points mainly. 9 Distribution area of the Nyanzian System; From Shinyanga to Iramba. 9 Boundary of plutonic and metamorphic rocks (Usagaran System) 9 Distribution area of Neogene sediments; Shinyanga, Igunga, Monduli, Kiteto, Dodoma and Singida areas. 9 Distribution range of Neogene volcanic rocks; Hanang, Babati, Monduli and Arumeru areas. 9 Surface feature of lineaments and faults. 9 Vegetation and land use of each area. 9 Hot spring; Lake Manyara. The Locations of field survey points are shown in Figure 3-4.

Figure3-4 Location of Field Survey Points

3-7 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

(1) Kainozoic (Cenozoic) Sediments of Manonga River Catchment Location No.; 111601 to 111607, 111701 to 111706

The boundary between the granitic rock of basement (gs-a) and the lake deposits (Nl) was identified at Loc. 111509 (P- 01). The topography of the zone along this boundary shows gentle inflection point where the basements area is level flat on north side and the lake deposits area is gentle slope dipping to south. The soil colour of granitics area shows yellowish light grey, other hand lake deposit shows gray colour. The lake deposit areas of east of Igunga have low vegetation covering comparatively (P- 01).

At location 111705, outcrops of sand, silt and calcrete were observed. Along the Manoga River, the soil colours show dark gray to gray, and the rice fields are distributed in this area (loc. 111706, P- 02).

P-01: Ground feature of lake deposits P-02: Ground feature around Manonga (Nl) area (Location 111509) River (Location 111706)

(2) The distribution of Nyanzian(Z) system and plutonics of basement (gs and gs-a) between Shinyanga and Singida. Location No.; 111501-111510, 111702, 111708, 111709 In area of Nyanzian system (Z), crystalline schist and gabbroic rocks were observed. The distributions of Nyanzian system were characterized by dark reddish brown to reddish brown soil that can be distinguished from the distribution of granitic rocks (gs and gs-a). Along the east side of Wembere River, large-scale N-S trending fault scarp was recognized by remote sensing data. The lithology around the fault consists of crystalline schist (P- 03). Conglomerate of quartzite showing terrace-like distribution was identified at Location No.111508.

3-8 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

P-03a: Out crop of green schist P-03b: Ground feature of Wembere (Location 111504) River catchment, view from edge of fault scarp(Location 111504)

(3) The Fault of South of Nzega Location 111710-111711 In the west margin of study area, Large-scale fault scarp trending N-S direction was newly-extracted by using remote sensing data. On the edge of fault scarp, fine-grained granitic rock (gs) was exposed occasionally (Loc 111711). Along this top of fault scarp, cultivated field are distributed (Loc 111711).

(4) Lineaments of East Singida Location; 111901-111902 The NE-SW large-scale fault is developing on the boundary of sub-basins A and G between Singida and Babati, and several lineaments were developed in sub-parallel to this large fault (P- 05). The topographic feature of NE-SW lineaments is observed as gentle valley (P- 06). Massive granitic rock (gs) and foliated granitic rock (gs) were observed. The soil colour shows light gray to gray. P-04: Cultivated area (gs) on the top of Gabbroic rock presumed as Nyanzian system fault scarp (Location 111711) (Z) was identified at Location 111902. This soil colour shows reddish brown characteristically.

3-9 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

Mt. Hanang Edges of fault scarps

Lineament

P-05: Ground features of edge of fault P-06: Ground feature of lineament scarp (Location 111901) (Location 111901)

(5) Distributions of Volcanic Rocks (Nv and Nvd) of Related Hanang and Kwaraha Volcanoes Location 1119003 to 111910 and 112001 to 112008

The distributions of pyroclastic rocks (Nvd) were observed around Hanang and Kwaraha volcanoes. Particularly, south area of Mt. Hanang (Loc 111904), a lot of volcanic crators were observed. In the LANDSAT ETM image, the area of pyroclastics has some spectral variations caused temporally by such as agricultural activity. Gneissose granite and gneiss (Xs) is observed at west of Babati (Loc.111910) where presuming thin pyroclastic rocks were overlain in partially.

(6) Drainage Feature around Babati Location; 112005 The (upstream of Dudumera River) is pure water and not dried up for whole year (P-07). In the LANDSAT image, this lake shows dark tone as compared to other lakes, it is presumed that deference of water depth is reflected. The East of Mt Hanang, the upper portion of Bubu River flows north to south, and shows high vegetation activity characteristically ranging about 20km. Therefore, in this area, high water resources potential are presumed, P-07: View of Lake Babati, from Location derived from infiltration water surrounding 112006 mountain.

3-10 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

(7) Neogene Sediments and Hot Springs around Lake Manyara Location; 112009, 112202, 112203, 112501 Around the Lake Manyara, the low plane consisting of Neogene sediments is wide spreading. Evapolite is observed at Loc.112501 (P-08). One of hot springs of Lake Manyara that is forming small pond and grass covered was observed at the bottom of the fault scarp in the western margin of Lake Manyara.(Loc.112203, P-09).

P-08: Evaporite of Neogene sediment P-09: Hot Spring of Lake Manyara (Location 112501) (Location 112203) (8) Ngorongoro area Location; 112012, 112101 to 112103 East side of Ngorongoro area, N-S trending Large-scale fault is developing. The fault scarp exposes intermediate alkaline type lava and basement metamorphic rocks. At location 112012 (P-10), intermediate lava was observed.

P-10: Large-scale Fault scarp and Lake Manyara (Left), and Outcrop of Andesitic lava (Right) (Location 112012). In Serengeti plane, pyroclastic rocks (Nvd) that derived from Neogene volcano such as Ngorongoro crater were widespread, and several NE-SW and EW trending lineaments and faults can be recognized on LANDSAT image., foliated granitic rock (gs) of basements is identified (location

3-11 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

112103, P-11) where the stream flows along the lineaments. Accordingly, Pyroclastics of this area is presumed as thin layer.

(9) Volcanic of Arusha and Monduli Location 112401 to 112406 Along the road between Arusha and Lake Manyara, lava flow and pyroclastic rocks of intermediate alkaline type were observed (Location 112402, P-12). In addition, N-E P-11: Ground feature of lineament in Serengeti area (Location 112103). trending fault scarps that is tens of meter height were developed.

(10) Ground Feature of Sub-basin I Location 112304 to 112313 Along the road between Arusha and Namanga, distribution of evaporite (E) and gneiss (Xs-l) were observed.

(11) Faults in Sub-basin B Location; 112302 P-12: Lava flow (Location 112402) In sub-basin B area, NW-SE trending faults are extracted by using remote sensing data, the edges of fault scarps can be viewed from location 112302(P-14). Fault structures presume normal faults system, because the south-west blocks of faults are drop down, north-east block of faults is gently dipping to north.

P-13: Outcrop of Evaporite (Location 112402)

3-12 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

(12) The boundary between unit gs and Xs near Kondoa Edges of fault Location; 112601 to 112604 The contact of granitic and metamorphic rocks is not observed directory. In east side of boundary, crystalline schist is observed, in west side of it, granitic having mylonitic texture was observed.

P- 14 Fault Scarp Viewing from Location 112302 (13) East of Kondoa and “Masai Steppe” Location; 112506-112507 In East of Kondoa, large-scale fault scarp trending NW-SE direction is developed along the boundary between geologic units Xs and Xs-l. The fault scarp consists of gneissose rocks. Area of Xs-l along the fault scarp, outcrops of gneissose rocks were observed locally. Topographic feature of Xs-l area show N-S trending gentle swell structure characteristically and occasionally developing small peaks probably exposing basement rocks. The soil colour of Xs-l area shows reddish brown to light brown.

P-15: Masai Steppe (Unit Xs-l Area), View P-16: Stream (location 112506) and Ground from location 112505. feature of Xs-l area (location 112507).

3-13 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

(14) East of Kibaya Location; 112701 to 112706 The Topographic feature shows N-S trending gentle ridges (Xs-a) and low planes (Xs-l). The fault scarps is not developed in this area. A part of low plane area is underlain by swamp deposit.

P-17: Ground feature of east Kibaya, east view (location 112704).

(15) Neogene Terrestrial Sediments around Dodoma Location; 112801-112806 Northeast side of the Bahi swamp distributing the Neogene sediments, ground covering is low dense vegetation and sparse cultivated area. The soil colour shows light gray. In north side of the Bahi swamp (Loc112808, P- 20), granitics rock of basement is observed.

P-18: Ground feature of north of Bahi P-19: Out crops of granitic rocks, north of swamp, west view (Location 112806). Bahi swamp (Location 112806).

(16) Faults of Manyoni Location; 112810 to 112813 In Manyoni area, NNW-SSE trending large-scale fault is developed and this fault intersect with several NE-SW trending faults. (refer to P-23) Weathered granitic rocks forming fault scarp are observed (P-22). The gentle trough was developed along under fault scarp of NE-SW trending fault of north side. The gap of fault scarps is up to 200m.

3-14 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

P-20: Edge of fault scarp(Location 112810) P-21: Strong weathered granitic rocks(gs-b)

P-22: Fault scarp, east of Manyoni

(17) Ground feature around Manyoni Location; 112814-112817 Level plane described”Kilimatinde cement” in geologic map, wide spreads north of Manyoni. The remote sensing data of this area suggest highly vegetation activity and level flat topographically. The ground covering is growing high dense trees, which are about two or three meter in height. The soil colour is light yellowish gray.

3-15 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

3.5 Detailed Analysis of Sub-basin G by Remote Sensing

3.5.1 Purpose of Survey The purposes of survey are as follows: ¾ To clarify the relationship between the geology and water contamination. ¾ To produced a detailed geological map by the interpretation of ASTER (Advanced Space borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) false colour image, band-ratio image, ASTER DEM and SRTM DEM (Shuttle Rader Topography Mission-Digital Elevation Model). ¾ To understand the geology and distribution of water resources by implementing a field survey based on the results of preliminary interpretation of remote sensing data. ¾ To obtain basic information for a water balance analysis.

3.5.2 Survey Area Taking consideration of the Phase I study, such as fluoride contamination, population and ground water potential, the sub-basin G area was selected as a detailed survey area (Figure3-5). The sub-basin G is located in the south central part of the Internal Drainage Basin (IDB). Two contrasting topographic features are observed in the basin, separated by ENE-WSW trending fault scrap. In the area north of fault, mountain and high land area (approximately EL 1,000-1,800m) are distributed and in the area south of the fault, on the other hand, low plain, Bahi swamp and gentle hills (approximately EL 800-1,00m) are widespread. River network system converges into the Bahi swamp. The main river in the basin is Bubu River, which flows from the northern end of basin down to the Bahi swamp.

3.5.3. Used Remote Sensing Data and Product Images For the study, seventeen scenes of ASTER data, ten scenes of LANDSAT ETM+ data and SRTM DEM data (approximately 37,800km2) were used. The ASTER data were prepared for detailed geological and water resources surveys. The images used for the study are listed in Table 3-2. The data acquisition months of the main part of the survey area were September 2000 and November 2005. ASTER mosaic false colour image are shown in Figure 3-5, and ASTER DEM topographic image is shown in Figure 3-6.

3-16 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

Table 3-2 List of Used ASTER Data No. Granule ID Acquisition Date 1 ASTL1A 0509210806430509250014 2005/9/21 2 ASTL1A 0509210806510509250018 2005/9/21 3 ASTL1A 0509210807000509250016 2005/9/21 4 ASTL1A 0511010800330511030419㩷 2005/11/1 5 ASTL1A 0511010800420511030420㩷 2005/11/1 6 ASTL1A 0511010800510511030421㩷 2005/11/1 7 ASTL1A 0511010801000511030422㩷 2005/11/1 8 ASTL1A 0511010801090511030423㩷 2005/11/1 9 ASTL1A 0009230822100302110386㩷 2000/9/23 10 ASTL1A 0009230822190302110387㩷 2000/9/23 11 ASTL1A 0009230822270302110388㩷 2000/9/23 12 ASTL1A 0009230822360302110389㩷 2000/9/23 13 ASTL1A 0009230822450302110390㩷 2000/9/23 14 ASTL1A 0601270806170601300527㩷 2006/1/27 15 ASTL1A 0601270806260601300528㩷 2006/1/27 16 ASTL1A 0506260801080507010634㩷 2005/06/26 17 ASTL1A 0506260801170507010635㩷 2005/06/26

The following ASTER data were processed for extracting natures of surface, water resources and geology. 9 ASTER false colour mosaic image (B, G, R, : Band1, Band3, Band6) 9 ASTER DEM shaded elevation map 9 ASTER SAVI (Soil Adjusted vegetation index) image 9 ASTER ratio image (B, G, R : Band4/Band6, Band4/Band1, Band2/Band1)

The Geological interpretation map was produced from above images together with published geological maps of Tanzania (1:125,000). 9 Geological interpretation map at a scale of 1:500,000 For estimation of water balance, the following LANDSAT ETM+ data images of dry and wet seasons were processed.

9 LANDSAT ETM false colour mosaic Image (B, G, R : Band2, Band4, Band5) 9 SAVI (Soil Adjusted vegetation index) image 9 VSW indices image (V: vegetation, S: soil, W: water area) 9 Land cover map. 9 Albedo map 9 Evapotranspiration map 9 Precipitation map (from observation data) 9 Runoff coefficient 9 Infiltration map

3-17 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

Figure 3-5 ASTER False Colour Mosaic Image (B, G, R : Band1, Band3, Band6)

3-18 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

LEGEND

Elevation (m) 2,500

500

Figure 3-6 ASTER/DEM Shaded Elevation Image

3-19 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

3.5.4 Survey Results The locations of field survey points are shown in Figure 3-7.

Check points and Location No.

Figure 3-7 Check Points of Field Survey

3-20 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

(1) Water Recourses In generally, vegetation activity of the dry season in semi-arid area is low. If high vegetation activity area is found in dry season, it is expected that the area is closely related to high level ground water potential or spring. In this study, SAVI (Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index) image were processed from ASTER data obtained in less rainfall seasons, in order to evaluate the water resources potential of the sub-basin G (Figure 3-8). Based on results of the analysis, field surveys were conducted.

1) SAVI (Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index) image In the whole area, SAVI values show less than 0.1. The area with High SAVI value are found in areas of Mt. Hanang, along northeast border of this sub-basin, parts of some rivers and surrounding some lakes. Based on SAVI value, topography and geological structure, several high potential areas of water resources were extracted. These areas are also shown in Figure 3-8

3-21 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

LEGEND SAVI Index 0.8

-0.7

Area of water resources potential by remote sensing data

Figure 3-8 ASTER SAVI Image

3-22 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

2) Field Survey Figure 3-7 shows check points of field survey and the descriptions of major check pints are given below. i) Check point 62702 Location; Latitude 4.63870 °S, Longitude 35.26650 °E, Elevation 1,404m This check point is high SAVI area located on northeast margin of the Lehu. This area is characterized by high density of vegetation and wet lands and some springs occur in the wet land. The water of the springs is fresh water and it is used for water supply. This area is located also at end of slope that consists of volcanic sediments and the water of springs is presumed to be derived from infiltrated water of the slope.

P-23 Spring and Wet Land of Lake Balangida Lehu. ii) Check point 62602 Location; Latitide 5.09549 °S, Longitude Fault scarp, N-S striking 35.06259 °E, Elevation 1,218m This area is located along the river at the foot Spring fault scarp. Hot Springs sporadically occur distributed in N-S trending, forming lakes and wet lands. The water is saline water and the water temperature is about 35 °C.

P-24 Hot Spring and Wet land, Fault Escarpment

3-23 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

iii) Check point 62801 Location; Latitude 5.20873 °S, Longitude 35.40615 °E, Elevation 1,223m There are several springs, and small ponds are found on gentle hill. Fresh water seems to be discharged from the springs throughout the year. In the vicinity of springs, granitic rocks with shear joints are exposed and the springs are derived from rock aquifer.

Shear joint, striking N10qE SpringSpring

P-25 Spring and Outcrop of Granitic Rock with Fractures iv) Check point 62805 Location; Latitude 5.31493 °S, Longitude 35.55545 °E, Elevation 1,092m Flat plain are widespread where Bubu River and their several branches are joined. The water flow of Bubu River is not observed during this survey, but vegetations show high density and high activity. Accordingly, the free ground water level is presumed to be high. In the photograph, there is gauging station at the bridge

East view from Kwa Mtoro Downstream

P-26 Ground Feature of Flat Plain along Bubu River

3-24 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

v) Check point 70704 Location; Latitude 5.73083 °S, Longitude 35.50046 °E, Elevation 970m There are several springs along river. The discharge rate of the springs seems to be large throughout the year. The water is weak saline and is used for human and livestock. Vegetation density is high along the stream. In upper part of this river, a flat plain consisting of Neogene sediments is widespread.

Spring Wetland Spring

P-27 Spring and Wetland

vi) Check point 70706 Location; Latitude 5.96209 °S, Longitude 35.52918 °E, Elevation 957m A spring is observed at the east margin of lake. The discharge of the spring is small throughout the year. The water is fresh water, and used for human activities. Geologically, this lake is located at junction between N-S fault and NE-SW trending faults. The basement rock of this area is granitic rocks, and the surface is covered by probably thin Neogene sediments. High vegetation activity areas are found not only around the lake but also along the N-S fault, therefore, large potential area of ground water is presumed to be spread along the fault

Fault scarp, N-S trending Lake

P-28 Small Spring and Ground Feature of the Lake

3-25 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

(2) Geology and Geological Structure The geological interpretation map and stratigraphic sequence of the area are shown in Figure 3-9 and Table 3-3, respectively. This interpretation map was produced using ASTER false colour image (Figure 3-7) and published geological maps of Tanzania (1:125,000). Furthermore, ASTER Ratio images Band4/Band6, Band4/Band1, Band2/Band1 (Figure 3-10) and ASTER DEM image were also used for the interpretation. This interpretation work of images at a scale of 1:500,000 was conducted in order to extract lithological and structural characteristics for the hydro-geological analysis. Based on the results of field survey, the interpretation map was confirmed. The details discussion is given following the results of field survey.

Table 3-3 Stratigraphy of the Study Area by Detailed Analysis

Age System Lithology Unit Unit by ASTER Image Interpretation

Aluvial; sand, gravel, silt; N mud. N: Undiferentiated Undifferentiated. Typically alkaline E Nm:Drak grey clay (Mbuga) volcanics: Olivine E: Evapolite QUATERNARY Lacustrine; sand, silt, basalt, alkali basalt, NI N NI Nv, Nf: Fluviatile sediments –NEOGINE limestone, tuff Terrestrial: sand, gravel, phonolite, trachyte, v Nvd Nf-l: Younger fluviatile (-23.3Ma) Nt - laterite, silcrete, calcrete. nephelinenite and Nv: Lave and Pyroclastics Fluviatile; -marine; pyroclastics. Nf Nvd: Mainly Pyroclastics and volcanic sediments sand;gravel; silt; Nf Nf KAINOZOIC (CENOZOIC) limestone. -l 㪬㫅㪺㫆㫅㪽㫆㫉㫄㫀㫋㫐

Mudstone; shale and phyllite; sandstone; arkose; BUKOBAN B B - quartzite; conglomerate; limestone. (570-2450Ma) PROTERO-ZOIC Marble; quartzite; graphitic schist; chlorite, Xs Topographic rough texture USAGARAN amphibole, mica and kyanite schist; hornblend Xs Xs-a Topographic intermidiate texture biotite and garnet gneiss; acid gneiss; granulite; Xs-l Topographic smooth texture KAVIRONDIAN Quartzite; phylite. V V - Banded Ironstone; metavolcanics; chlorite schist; NYANZIAN Z Z - pseudo-porphyry. ARCHEAN

(2450-4600Ma) schist; gneiss; quartzite; amphibolite and D Topographic rough texture DODOMAN D hornblend gneiss; acid gneiss; migmatite. D-l Topographic smooth texture Plutonic Rocks

Age Lithology Unit Unit by LANDSAT Image Interpretation

Granite and granodiorite, foliated, gneissose or gs Topographic rough texture migmatitic, some massive porphiyroblastic, gs-a Topographic intermediate texture Mainly ARCHEAN gs includes intimately related regional Topographic smooth texture. gs-b migmatite.(Syn-orogenic) Strong weathered granite

3-26 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

Figure 3-9 Geological Interpretation Map of Sub-basin G Area

3-27 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

Figure 3-10 ASTER Ratio image (B, G, R: Band4/Band6, Band4/Band1, Band2/Band1)

3-28 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

1) Precambrian Basement Rocks i) Dodoman System (Archean): D, D-l Check point: 62201-62206, 62212 The Dodoman system is the oldest formation in Tanzania which consists of schist, gneiss and migmatite. It is distributed south of Dodoma city. This system can be classified into two units; “D” and “D-l” based on their topographic features. In ASTER false colour image (Figure 3-7), Unit “D-l” area shows characteristic lighter white colour. Schist and leucocratic gneiss are exposed at Location 62203-62204. Ground surface feature of “D-l” area is, generally, characterized by light grey to grey colour soil and sparse vegetation.

P-30 Leucocratic gneiss (62203) and light grey soil (62203) of “Unite “D-l” ii) Usagaran System (Achaean): Xs, Xs-a and Xs-l Check point: 70201-70207 The Usagaran system consists of marble, schist, gneiss and migmatite. These rocks crop out in the eastern part of the survey area. This system can be classified into three units; “Xs”, “Xs-a” and “Xs-l” based on their topographic features. The soil colour, generally, is light grey. iii) Bukoban System (Proterozoic): B The Bukoban system consists of sedimentary P-31 Gneiss of the Dodoman System (70201) rocks such as mudstone, shale, sandstone and others. Exposures of the rocks are confirmed only in the limited area in the southern part of the Bahi Swamp.

3-29 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

iv) Plutonic Rocks (mainly Archean); gs, gs-a, gs-b Check point: 62604, 62605, 62801, 70101-70107, 70403 Plutonic rocks consist of granite, granodiorite and gneissose or migmatitic rocks. Plutonic rocks are widely distributed from the central to the northern part of the basin and west side of Bahi. Plutonic rocks can be classified into three units based on degree of weathering analyzed by their topographic features. Unit “gs” widely distributed in almost whole area of plutonic rocks is characterized by rough texture on the LANDSAT images and topographically high altitude. Unit “gs-b” distributed along Tanzanian Railroad at Manyoni in the northwest is characterized by very smooth texture. Unit “gs-b” corresponds to the intensely weathered zone, named as “Kilimatinde cement” in the published geological map. Unit “gs-a” has intermediate feature between “gs” and gs-b. In this field survey, granitic mylonite and granitic cataclasite are observed sporadically. Near the boundary between “gs” and “Xs”, the rocks are foliated.

P-32 Granitic Rock and Ground P-33 Cataclastic granite (70103). Feature of Unit “gs” (62604)

2) Kainozoic (Cenozoic) Formations Check point: 062401-062410, 062601-062603 During late Neogene, lacustrine sediments, terrestrial sediments, fluviatile sediments, marine sediments and alluvial sediments deposited in the lakes and shallow basins formed by the warping of the surface that accompanied by rift-faulting movements. These sediments consist of sand, silt, evaporite, clay and conglomerate. These sediments are mainly distributed in the centre of central to southern part of the basin where characterized by topographically low plane. In northern part of basin, these sediments are distributed along the Bubu River system and along large fault scarp of north-western part. Based on published geological map and ASTER image interpretation, these Cenozoic sediments are classified into five units of N, Nf, Nf-l, E and Nm. Unit “Nf-l” are distributed in north of the Bahi Swamp where characterized by delta fan structure. Consequently,

3-30 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

this unit is considered younger sediment than Unit “Nf”. By using ASTER ratio image (Figure 3-10), Unite “Nf-l” can be clearly distinguished from other Neogene formations. Unit “Nm” consists of dark grey clay, which is locally called as “Mbuga”, and it is sporadically distributed in a whole area. This unit occurs in topographically flat low plain, some of which forming swamp in wet season. In the southern end of the basin, this unite is extensively distributed.

P-34 Feature of Ground Surface of Unit P-35 Reddish Sand of Unit “N”, showing “N” (62406) Cross Lamina (062601)

P-36 Ground Surface of Unit “Nf-l” (70601) P-37 Dark Grey Clay of Unit “Nm” (62208)

3-31 The Study on the Groundwater Resources Development and Management in the Internal Drainage Basin -Supporting Report- Chapter 3 Geology

3) Volcanic Rocks Check point: 62701-62707 In the northern end of the basin, volcanic rocks occur around Mt. Hanang. These volcanic massifs consist of an accumulation of extensive alkaline lava and pyroclastics. In general, alkaline type volcanic rocks have

high volatile components such as H2O, CO2, F and so on. Distribution of volcanic lavas and pyroclastics can be delineated on the ASTER Ratio image. In the interpretation map, Cenozoic volcanic rocks are divided into P-38 Volcanic Sediments of Unit “Nvd” (62705) “Nv” and “Nvd”. “Nv” consists of lava and pyroclastic rocks which are forming Mt. Hanang. “Nvd” consists of pyroclastic rocks, volcanic sediments and calcareous tuff.

4) Geological Structure Distributions of lineaments and faults are shown in Figure 3-9. A large number of lineaments and faults are extracted by structural analysis using ASTER image and DEM. In this study, fault was identified by a presence of step structure along lineament. Faults and lineaments can be classified into two systems with different trend. One is NE-SW trending system and another is N-S trending system. NE-SW trending faults and lineaments are predominant and extracted from the almost whole of basin. N-S trending faults and lineaments are continuous; however, they occur less frequently than NE-SW system. Both systems develop not only in the basement rocks but also in Neogene sediments of unit “N”. It seems that N-S trending system cut the NE-SW trending lineaments.

P-39 Large N-S Trending Fault P-40 Ground Feature of N-S Trending Escarpment (62404) Faults in Unit “N”(70701). Soil shows reddish brown colour.

3-32