DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Tanzania in Figures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2019 Tanzania in Figures The United Republic of Tanzania 2019 TANZANIA IN FIGURES National Bureau of Statistics Dodoma June 2020 H. E. Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli President of the United Republic of Tanzania “Statistics are very vital in the development of any country particularly when they are of good quality since they enable government to understand the needs of its people, set goals and formulate development programmes and monitor their implementation” H.E. Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli the President of the United Republic of Tanzania at the foundation stone-laying ceremony for the new NBS offices in Dodoma December, 2017. What is the importance of statistics in your daily life? “Statistical information is very important as it helps a person to do things in an organizational way with greater precision unlike when one does not have. In my business, for example, statistics help me know where I can get raw materials, get to know the number of my customers and help me prepare products accordingly. Indeed, the numbers show the trend of my business which allows me to predict the future. My customers are both locals and foreigners who yearly visit the region. In June every year, I gather information from various institutions which receive foreign visitors here in Dodoma. With estimated number of visitors in hand, it gives me ample time to prepare products for my clients’ satisfaction. In terms of my daily life, Statistics help me in understanding my daily household needs hence make proper expenditures.” Mr. Kulwa James Zimba, Artist, Sixth street Dodoma.”. What is the importance of statistics in your daily life? “Statistical Data is useful for development at family as well as national level because without statistics one cannot plan and implement development plans properly. At the household level, if you are to be successful you have to know the basics needs of the households and find the way to meet those needs. For example, in order to satisfy the needs of my household, I have to take into consideration the number of household members, establish their needs and find out how much resources required to meet those needs. The same to the country, in order to achieve national development which is basically a result of better planning, the government needs statistics. Let us look at the Fifth phase Government under His Excellency President Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli decision to audit civil servant payroll which revealed more than 10, 000 ‘ghost workers’ whose cost to the government was more than USD 2m per month. Having the right number of Government employees help to understand the actual cost of government wage bill and make proper planning. Therefore, Statistics is very essential because without numbers it becomes difficult to do business.” Mr. Mzamilu Issa Issondo, a grocery retailer, Chang’ombe, Dodoma. ### Preface Tanzania in Figures 2019 booklet gives clear insight of Tanzania in economic performance, social, environmental and political spheres. Tanzania in Figures 2019 booklet presents the data series for the period from 2015 to 2019. This booklet provides aggregated data and contains information from various official statistical publications compiled by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), sector ministries, Government Departments and Agencies. The indicators presented are useful to policy makers for planning, monitoring and evaluation of various development programs at all levels. The National Bureau of Statistics, as a coordinator and producer of official statistics in the Country, appreciates the contributions made by various stakeholders in statistics for supplying inputs used in the compilation of this booklet. In order to effectively participate in strengthening the National Statistical System (NSS), we urge further co-operation in updating and compilation of the forthcoming editions of similar booklet and other statistical publications. The latest figures for 2019 presented in this booklet for some indicators are provisional and may be revised according to the NBS revision policies. Also, information in some tables are sourced from census and surveys which mostly are conducted in a lag of ten or five years. The data gaps attributed to the surveys shall be filled immediately upon availability of respective survey reports. Comments and suggestions that may help to enrich the next edition of Tanzania in Figures are welcome from all stakeholders. The soft copy is also available on the NBS website; www.nbs.go.tz. For more detailed information on the published statistics, please visit the NBS library and the website. i ### WHAT IS NEW IN 2019 The Outbreak of Corona Virus Disease (COVID - 2019) The COVID 2019 pandemic started in December 2019 in China and spread to most of the world countries including Tanzania ii ### Tanzania recorded the first incidence of COVID – 19 on 16th March, 2020. By 29th April, 2020 Corona cases reported in the country was 480 while 167 had been recovered and death record reached 16. Honorable Kassim Majaliwa Majaliwa (MP) The Prime Minister of United Republic of Tanzania iii ### Number of New Confirmed COVID -19 Cases by Region, Tanzania; 20 April 2020 Source: Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children iv ### Preference in Africa According to Worldometer website, as of 14th May 2020 a total confirmed case in Africa was 74,064 in which South Africa was leading with 12,074 cases while the least country was Lesotho with 1 reported case. Out of total confirmed cases 26,342 have been recovered equivalent to 35.6 percent and total death were 2,508 which is equivalent to 3.4 percent while active cases were 45,214 equivalents to 61.0 percent. v ### COVID -19 Total Confirmed Case in Africa as of 10 AM CEST; 11 May, 2020 Source: World Health Organization (WHO), Situation Report - 112 vi ### COVID -19 Total Death in Africa as of 10 AM CEST; 11 May, 2020 Source: World Health Organization (WHO), Situation Report - 112 vii ### COVID -19 Total Confirmed New Cases in Africa as of 10 AM CEST; 11 May, 2020 Source: World Health Organization (WHO), Situation Report - 112 viii ### COVID -19 Total New Death in Africa as of 10 AM CEST; 11 May, 2020 Source: World Health Organization (WHO), Situation Report - 112 ix ### Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Cases as per WHO Region by 10:00 CEST; 13 May 2020 WHO Region Total New cases 24 hours Death New Death 24 hours Globally 4,170,424 81,577 287,399 4,245 Africa 49,429 2,600 1,500 51 America 1,781,564 37,847 106,504 1,955 Eastern Mediterranean 284,270 10,243 9,259 121 Europe 1,780,316 24,527 159,799 1,918 South-East Asia 110,932 5,031 3,746 149 Western Pacific 163,201 1,329 6,578 51 Other* 712 0 13 0 Source: World Health Organization (WHO), Situation Report - 114 Other*: includes cases reported under the international conveyance (Diamond Princess). x ### Contents Preface .......................................................................................................................................................................................... i WHAT IS NEW.............................................................................................................................................................................. ii Abbreviations, Acronyms, Symbols and Notes ............................................................................................................................ xiii 1.0 Background ................................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Geography .................................................................................................................................................................2 3.0 Politics .....................................................................................................................................................................15 4.0 Population ................................................................................................................................................................18 5.0 Health ......................................................................................................................................................................24 6.0 Education .................................................................................................................................................................36 7.0 Employment .............................................................................................................................................................40 8.0 Investment................................................................................................................................................................44 9.0 Household Budget Survey Statistics ....................................................................................................................45 10.0 Economic Indicators..................................................................................................................................................48 11.0 Foreign Trade ...........................................................................................................................................................60 12.0 Performance Indicators for Selected Economic Activities ...........................................................................................61 12.1 Agriculture and Livestock ........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Ruaha Journal of Business, Economics and Management Sciences, Vol.1, Issue 1, 2018  Ms Hadija Matimbwa , Faculty of Business and Management Science, RUCU Iii

    Ruaha Journal of Business, Economics and Management Sciences, Vol.1, Issue 1, 2018  Ms Hadija Matimbwa , Faculty of Business and Management Science, RUCU Iii

    RUAHA JOURNAL of Business, Economics and Management Sciences Faculty of Business and Management Sciences Vol 1, Issue 1, 2018 A. Editorial Board i. Executive Secretarial Members Chairman: Dr. Alex Juma Ochumbo, Dean Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, RUCU Chief Editor: Prof. Robert Mabele, Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, RUCU Managing Editor: Dr.Venance Ndalichako, Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, RUCU Business Manager: Dr. Alberto Gabriel Ndekwa, Faculty of Business and Management Science, RUCU Secretary to the Board: Ms. Hawa Jumanne,Faculty of Business and Management Science, RUCU ii. Members of the Editorial Board Dr. Dominicus Kasilo, Faculty of Business and Management Science, RUCU Bishop Dr. Edward Johnson Mwaikali,Bishop of Mbeya, Formerly with RUCU Dr. Theobard Kipilimba, Faculty of Business and Management Science, RUCU Dr. Esther Ikasu, Faculty of Business and Management Science, RUCU ii Ruaha Journal of Business, Economics and Management Sciences, Vol.1, Issue 1, 2018 Ms Hadija Matimbwa , Faculty of Business and Management Science, RUCU iii. Associate Editors Prof. Enock Wicketye Iringa University,Tanzania. Dr. Enery Challu University of Dar es Dr. Ernest Abayo Makerere University, Uganda. Dr. Vicent Leyaro University of Dar es Salaam Dr. Hawa Tundui Mzumbe University, Tanzania. B. Editorial Note Ruaha Journal of Business, Economics and Management Sciences would like to wish all our esteemed readers on this first appearance A HAPPY NEW YEAR. We shall be appearing twice a year January and July. We hope you will be able to help us fulfill this pledge by feeding us with journal articles, book reviews and other such journal writings and stand ready to read from cover to cover all our issues.
  • Issued by the Britain-Tanzania Society No 114 May - Aug 2016

    Issued by the Britain-Tanzania Society No 114 May - Aug 2016

    Tanzanian Affairs Issued by the Britain-Tanzania Society No 114 May - Aug 2016 Magufuli’s “Cleansing” Operation Zanzibar Election Re-run Nyerere Bridge Opens David Brewin: MAGUFULI’S “CLEANSING” OPERATION President Magufuli helps clean the street outside State House in Dec 2015 (photo State House) The seemingly tireless new President Magufuli of Tanzania has started his term of office with a number of spectacular measures most of which are not only proving extremely popular in Tanzania but also attracting interest in other East African countries and beyond. It could be described as a huge ‘cleansing’ operation in which the main features include: a drive to eliminate corruption (in response to widespread demands from the electorate during the November 2015 elections); a cutting out of elements of low priority in the expenditure of government funds; and a better work ethic amongst government employees. The President has changed so many policies and practices since tak- ing office in November 2015 that it is difficult for a small journal like ‘Tanzanian Affairs’ to cover them adequately. He is, of course, operat- ing through, and with the help of ministers, regional commissioners and cover photo: The new Nyerere Bridge in Dar es Salaam (see Transport) Magufuli’s “Cleansing” Operation 3 others, who have been either kept on or brought in as replacements for those removed in various purges of existing personnel. Changes under the new President The following is a list of some of the President’s changes. Some were not carried out by him directly but by subordinates. It is clear however where the inspiration for them came from.
  • Challenging the Win-Win Proposition of Community-Based Wildlife Management in Tanzania

    Challenging the Win-Win Proposition of Community-Based Wildlife Management in Tanzania

    THE PIMA PROJECT RESEARCH DISSEMINATION NOTE Poverty ad ecosyste service ipacts of Tazaia’s Wildlife Maageet Areas BURUNGE WMA Map of Burunge WMA Burunge was registered in 2006 and received user rights in Manyara 2007. Its nine1 member villages are: Kakoi, Olasiti, Magara, Lake Manyara Ranch National Park Maweni, Manyara, Sangaiwe, Mwada, Ngolei, Vilima Vitatu. They are home to ca. 34,000 people of the Mbugwe, Barbaig, Iraqw, Maasai and Warusha ethnicities have set Burunge aside 280 km2 for wildlife conservation purposes, WMA facilitated by African Wildlife Foundation and Babati District. Located between Tarangire National Park, Tarangire Manyara Ranch and Lake Manyara National Park in Babati National Park district, Manyara region, the WMA features a large tourism potential. Currently the WMA has agreements with four tourism investors operating across 6 lodge sites and one hunting block. The PIMA project dissemination note Fig. 1: Map of Burunge WMA (white). Village borders (black) are The Poverty and ecosystem service I estimates, based on georeferenced village maps, fieldwork, GIS shapefiles from NBS, WWF, TANAPA. Compiled by J. Bluwstein. Wildlife Management Areas (PIMA) project is an international research collaboration mpactsinvolving of UniversityTanzanias College London, the University of Copenhagen, Imperial Fact box: Burunge WMA College London, Edinburgh University, the Tanzania Region Manyara Member villages 9 Wildlife Research Institute, the UNEP World Conservation Population (PHC 2012) 34,000 Monitoring Centre, and the Tanzania Natural Resources Area 280 km2 Forum. PIMA collected household-level information on Year registered 2006 wealth and livelihoods through surveys and wealth ranking Authorised Association (AA) Juhibu exercises, supplemented with WMA- and village-level WMA Income 2014/2015 (USD) 381,835 information on WMA governance, including revenue distribution.
  • Dissemination Meeting Held in Arusha, Tanzania (10 December 2019)

    Dissemination Meeting Held in Arusha, Tanzania (10 December 2019)

    REPORT OF THE WILLOWS IMPACT EVALUATION (WIE) DISSEMINATION MEETING HELD IN ARUSHA, TANZANIA (10 DECEMBER 2019) PI: Prof. Sia Msuya Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center P.O. Box 3010 Moshi, Tanzania Tel: +255- 2754379 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Table of contents 1.0. Background .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0. Meeting Participants ................................................................................................................ 3 3.0. Meeting Presentations .............................................................................................................. 4 4.0. Discussion and Meeting Recommendations ............................................................................ 6 5.0. Closing Remarks ...................................................................................................................... 9 6.0. Conclusions ............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 7.0. Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 12 8.0. Appendices .............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 2 1.0. Background The Willows Impact Evaluation project (hereafter WIE is a collaborative evaluation programme between (Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College (hereafter KCMUCo) and the Harvard T.H Chan School
  • Revisiting the Rural-Urban Linkages in East Africa: Continuity Or Breakdown in the Spatial Model of Rural Development? the Case of the Kilimanjaro Region in Tanzania

    Revisiting the Rural-Urban Linkages in East Africa: Continuity Or Breakdown in the Spatial Model of Rural Development? the Case of the Kilimanjaro Region in Tanzania

    Belgeo Revue belge de géographie 1 | 2020 Miscellaneous Revisiting the rural-urban linkages in East Africa: Continuity or breakdown in the spatial model of rural development? The case of the Kilimanjaro region in Tanzania Bernard Charlery de la Masselière, François Bart, Bénédicte Thibaud and Rémi Benos Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/38669 DOI: 10.4000/belgeo.38669 ISSN: 2294-9135 Publisher: National Committee of Geography of Belgium, Société Royale Belge de Géographie Electronic reference Bernard Charlery de la Masselière, François Bart, Bénédicte Thibaud and Rémi Benos, “Revisiting the rural-urban linkages in East Africa: Continuity or breakdown in the spatial model of rural development?”, Belgeo [Online], 1 | 2020, Online since 27 May 2020, connection on 20 January 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/38669 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.38669 This text was automatically generated on 20 January 2021. Belgeo est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Revisiting the rural-urban linkages in East Africa: Continuity or breakdown i... 1 Revisiting the rural-urban linkages in East Africa: Continuity or breakdown in the spatial model of rural development? The case of the Kilimanjaro region in Tanzania Bernard Charlery de la Masselière, François Bart, Bénédicte Thibaud and Rémi Benos AUTHOR'S NOTE This paper is a result of some extensive research carried out under the European programme RurbanAfrica (www.rurbanafrica.ku.dk) coordinated by the university of Copenhagen. Introduction 1 In Africa, agriculture transformation and rural livelihood diversification on one side, rapid growth of the urban system on another side are the general indices of the emergence of a new model of development.
  • Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga Na Matunda

    Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga Na Matunda

    FEED THE FUTURE TANZANIA MBOGA NA MATUNDA Quarterly Report # 10 July 1 - September 30, 2019 Annual Report #3, FY 2019 October 1 2018 – September 30, 2019 Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga na Matunda | Quarterly Report #10 Fintrac Inc. www.fintrac.com [email protected] US Virgin Islands 3077 Kronprindsens Gade 72 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Tel: (340) 776-7600 Fax: (340) 776-7601 Washington, DC 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 USA Tel: (202) 462-8475 Fax: (202) 462-8478 Feed the Future Mboga na Matunda (FTFT-MnM) P.O Box 13121, Plot No. 37 Mlandege Street | Mikocheni B Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Cover photo: FTFT-MnM staff and partner Rijk Zwaan inspect sweet pepper crop in Unguja, Zanzibar. Photo credit: Sala Lewis on behalf of CSIS. All photos in main document by Fintrac Inc. Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Feed the Future Tanzania Horticulture Mboga na Matunda | Quarterly Report #9 CONTENTS ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................ i 1. ACTIVITY OVERVIEW/SUMMARY ........................................................................... 1 1.1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Summary of Results for this Quarter ........................................................................... 2 1.3 Evaluation/Assessment Status and/or Plans............................................................... 14 1.4 Key findings from the smallholder farmer survey ....................................................
  • Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile

    Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile

    The United Republic of Tanzania Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance Dar es Salaam and Office of Chief Government Statistician Ministry of State, President ‟s Office, State House and Good Governance Zanzibar April, 2014 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile Foreword The 2012 Population and Housing Census (PHC) for the United Republic of Tanzania was carried out on the 26th August, 2012. This was the fifth Census after the Union of Tanganyika and Zanzibar in 1964. Other censuses were carried out in 1967, 1978, 1988 and 2002. The 2012 PHC, like previous censuses, will contribute to the improvement of quality of life of Tanzanians through the provision of current and reliable data for policy formulation, development planning and service delivery as well as for monitoring and evaluating national and international development frameworks. The 2012 PHC is unique as the collected information will be used in monitoring and evaluating the Development Vision 2025 for Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar Development Vision 2020, Five Year Development Plan 2011/12–2015/16, National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) commonly known as MKUKUTA and Zanzibar Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (ZSGRP) commonly known as MKUZA. The Census will also provide information for the evaluation of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015. The Poverty Monitoring Master Plan, which is the monitoring tool for NSGRP and ZSGRP, mapped out core indicators for poverty monitoring against the sequence of surveys, with the 2012 PHC being one of them. Several of these core indicators for poverty monitoring are measured directly from the 2012 PHC.
  • Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile

    Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile

    The United Republic of Tanzania Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance Dar es Salaam and Office of Chief Government Statistician Ministry of State, President ’s Office, State House and Good Governance Zanzibar April, 2014 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile Foreword The 2012 Population and Housing Census (PHC) for the United Republic of Tanzania was carried out on the 26th August, 2012. This was the fifth Census after the Union of Tanganyika and Zanzibar in 1964. Other censuses were carried out in 1967, 1978, 1988 and 2002. The 2012 PHC, like previous censuses, will contribute to the improvement of quality of life of Tanzanians through the provision of current and reliable data for policy formulation, development planning and service delivery as well as for monitoring and evaluating national and international development frameworks. The 2012 PHC is unique as the collected information will be used in monitoring and evaluating the Development Vision 2025 for Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar Development Vision 2020, Five Year Development Plan 2011/12–2015/16, National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) commonly known as MKUKUTA and Zanzibar Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (ZSGRP) commonly known as MKUZA. The Census will also provide information for the evaluation of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015. The Poverty Monitoring Master Plan, which is the monitoring tool for NSGRP and ZSGRP, mapped out core indicators for poverty monitoring against the sequence of surveys, with the 2012 PHC being one of them. Several of these core indicators for poverty monitoring are measured directly from the 2012 PHC.
  • Local Perceptions, Cultural Beliefs, Practices and Changing Perspectives of Handling Infant Feces: a Case Study in a Rural Geita District, North-Western Tanzania

    Local Perceptions, Cultural Beliefs, Practices and Changing Perspectives of Handling Infant Feces: a Case Study in a Rural Geita District, North-Western Tanzania

    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Local Perceptions, Cultural Beliefs, Practices and Changing Perspectives of Handling Infant Feces: A Case Study in a Rural Geita District, North-Western Tanzania Joy J. Chebet 1,*, Aminata Kilungo 1,2, Halimatou Alaofè 1, Hamisi Malebo 3, Shaaban Katani 3 and Mark Nichter 1,4 1 Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA; [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (H.A.); [email protected] (M.N.) 2 Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA 3 National Institute for Medical Research, 11101 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; [email protected] (H.M.); [email protected] (S.K.) 4 Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 April 2020; Accepted: 25 April 2020; Published: 29 April 2020 Abstract: We report on the management of infant feces in a rural village in Geita region, Tanzania. Findings discussed here emerged incidentally from a qualitative study aimed at investigating vulnerability and resilience to health challenges in rural settings. Data was gathered through semi-structured focus group discussions (FDGs) with women (n = 4; 32 participants), men (n = 2; 16 participants), and community leaders (n = 1; 8 participants). All FDGs were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using Atlas.ti. Respondents reported feces of a child under the age of six months were considered pure compared to those of older children.
  • Supervisory Committee

    Supervisory Committee

    Costs and Benefits of Nature-Based Tourism to Conservation and Communities in the Serengeti Ecosystem by Masuruli Baker Masuruli BSc. Sokoine University of Agriculture, 1993 MSc. University of Kent, 1997 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Geography Masuruli Baker Masuruli, 2014 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Costs and Benefits of Nature-Based Tourism to Conservation and Communities in the Serengeti Ecosystem by Masuruli Baker Masuruli BSc. Sokoine University of Agriculture, 1993 MSc. University of Kent, 1997 Supervisory Committee Dr. Philip Dearden (Department of Geography) Co-Supervisor Dr. Rick Rollins (Department of Geography) Co-Supervisor Dr. Leslie King (Department of Geography) Departmental Member Dr. Ana Maria Peredo (Peter B. Gustavson School of Business, University of Victoria) Outside Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Philip Dearden (Department of Geography) Co-Supervisor Dr. Rick Rollins (Department of Geography) Co-Supervisor Dr. Leslie King (Department of Geography) Departmental Member Dr. Ana Maria Peredo (Peter B. Gustavson School of Business, University of Victoria) Outside Member People visit protected areas (PAs) for enjoyment and appreciation of nature. However, tourism that is not well planned and managed can significantly degrade the environment, and impact negatively on nearby communities. Of further concern is the distribution of the costs and benefits of nature-based tourism (NBT) in PAs, with some communities experiencing proportionally more benefits, while other communities experience more of the cost.
  • AFRICA - Uganda and East DRC - Basemap ) !( E Nzara Il ILEMI TRIANGLE N N

    AFRICA - Uganda and East DRC - Basemap ) !( E Nzara Il ILEMI TRIANGLE N N

    !( !( !( )"" !( ! Omo AFRICA - Uganda and East DRC - Basemap ) !( e Nzara il ILEMI TRIANGLE N n Banzali Asa Yambio i ! ! !( a t n u ETHIOPIA o !( !( SNNP M Camp 15 WESTERN ( l !( EQUATORIA e !( b e Torit Keyala Lobira Digba J !( !( Nadapal ! l !( ± e r Lainya h a ! !Yakuluku !( Diagbe B Malingindu Bangoie ! !( ! Duru EASTERN ! Chukudum Lokitaung EQUATORIA !( Napopo Ukwa Lokichokio ! ! !( Banda ! Kpelememe SOUTH SUDAN ! Bili Bangadi ! ! Magwi Yei !( Tikadzi ! CENTRAL Ikotos EQUATORIA !( Ango !( Bwendi !( Moli Dakwa ! ! ! Nambili Epi ! ! ! Kumbo Longo !( !Mangombo !Ngilima ! Kajo Keji Magombo !( Kurukwata ! Manzi ! ! Aba Lake Roa !( ! Wando Turkana Uda ! ! Bendele Manziga ! ! ! Djabir Kakuma Apoka !( !( Uele !( MARSABIT Faradje Niangara Gangara Morobo Kapedo !( ! !( !( Dikumba Dramba ! Dingila Bambili Guma ! Moyo !( !( ! Ali !( Dungu ! Wando ! Mokombo Gata Okondo ! ! ! !( Nimule !( Madi-Opel Bandia Amadi !( ! ! Makilimbo Denge Karenga ! ! Laropi !( !( !( LEGEND Mbuma Malengoya Ndoa !( Kalokol ! ! Angodia Mangada ! Duku ile Nimule Kaabong !( ! ! ! ! Kaya N Dembia ert !( Po Kumuka Alb Padibe ! Gubeli ! Tadu Yumbe !( Bambesa ! Wauwa Bumva !( !( Locations Bima !( ! Tapili ! Monietu ! !( ! Dili Lodonga " ! Koboko " Capital city Dingba Bibi Adi !( !( Orom ) ! Midi-midi ! ! !( Bima Ganga Likandi Digili ! Adjumani ! ! ! ! Gabu Todro Namokora Loyoro TURKANA Major city ! Tora Nzoro ! !( !( ! ! !( Lagbo Oleba Kitgum Other city Mabangana Tibo Wamba-moke Okodongwe ! Oria !( !( ! ! ! ! ! Omugo Kitgum-Matidi Kana Omiya Anyima !( ! !( Atiak Agameto Makongo
  • Final Report

    Final Report

    Final Report Baseline Study for Hand in Hand Eastern Africa Program in Northern Tanzania August 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................. 2 List of tables.......................................................................................................................... 3 List of figures ........................................................................................................................ 4 List of Abbreviations.............................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgement................................................................................................................. 6 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Overview of HiH EA Model.................................................................................... 13 1.2 HiH EA Expansion Plan for Tanzania.................................................................... 14 2. The Baseline Study...................................................................................................... 15 2.1 The Scoping Study................................................................................................ 15 2.1.1 Objectives of the Scoping