DOCSLIB.ORG

Transmission of Virus by the Progeny of Crosses Between Xiphinema Diversicaudatum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Transmission of virus by the progeny of crosses between XQhinema diversicaudatüm (Nematoda : Dorylaimoidea) from Italy and Scotland Derek J. F. BROWN Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, 002 SDA, Scotland. SUMMARY Transmission of the type-British strainsof arabis mosaic (AMV-T) and strawberry latent ringspot viruses (SLRV-T) and a strain of SLRV from Italy (SLRV-Ip) by FI and F2 hybrid Xiphinenza diversicaudatum was examined in the laboratory. The hybrid nematodes were crossbred from populations which readily (Scotland) and only infrequently (Italy) transmitted viruses.The ability of X. diversicaudatum hybrids to transmit viruses was foundto be inherited withthe choice of both maternaland paternal parents affecting the hybrids ability to transmit viruses. It is possible that the genetic influence on the hybrids ability to transmit viruses was cytoplasmically inherited. The principal factor likely to be involved is the ability of X. di ver sic au da tu??^ selectively and specifically to retain virus particles at sites of retention within its feeding apparatus. RBSUME La transnzission des virus par la descendance de croiselnents entre Xiphjnema diversicaudatum (Nernatoda :Do ylainzoidea) provenantd’ltalie et d’Ecosse La transmission de souches de type britannique des virus de la mosaïque arabis (AMV-T), du virus du G ringspot n latent du fraisier (SLRV-T)et d’une souchede SLRV provenant d‘Italie (SLRV-Ip) par des hybridesFI et F2 de Xiphinewa diversicaudatuwz .a été Ctudiée au laboratoire. Les nématodes hybrides étaient obtenus par croisements entre populations qui transmettent les virus soit activement (Ecosse), soit seulement occasionnellement (Italie). La capacité de transmission des virus montrée par les X. diversicaudatunz hybrides est héritée suivant le choix des parents maternel et paternel. Il est possible que cette capacite soit héritée cytoplasmiquement, et le facteur principal la concernant paraît être la possibilité pourX. diversicaudatunt de retenir les particules du virus sélectivement et spécifiquement dans les sites spécialisés de l’appareil nutritionnel. 1 In laboratory experiments nineof twelve populations Materials and Methods of Xiphinemadiversicaudatum (Micoletzky, 1927) Thorne, 1939 from different parts of the world were The populations of X. diversicaudatum came from effective vectors of two strains of arabis mosaic (AMV) Dundee,Scotland and the Lombardi region, Italy and the type-British strain of strawberry latent ringspot (Brown & Topham, 1985). Progeny were obtained by the viruses (SLRV-T; Brown, 1985, 1986 a). Populations method described by Brown(1986 b) and came fromsix from France, Italy and Spain transmitted these viruses parental lines, Italianmaternal and paternal (IIPl), infrequently. A strain of SLRV from Italy was trans- Scottish maternal and paternal (SSPl), Italian maternal mitted very infrequently by several populationsbut and Scottishpaternal (ISFl), Scottishmaternal and nematodes from Italy were consistent vectors (Brown, Italian paternal (SIFl), ISFl parentage(ISFZ) and SIFl 1985,1986 a; Brown &Taylor,1981; Brown & Trudgill, parentage (SIF2). 1983). The seroIogically distinguishable strains of virus used were the type-British strains of arabis mosaic (AMV-T; Brown (1986 b) showed that the populations of X. Harrison, 1958) andstrawberry latent ringspot diversicaudatum, including that from Italy, readily in- (SLRV-T; Lister, 1964) and a strain of SLRV isolated terbred with one from Scotland.In this paper theability from Prunus persica L. growingin Italy(SLRV-Ip; of progeny of crosses between the Scottish and Italian Brown & Trudgill, 1983). population to transmit strains of AMV and SLRV are Virus transmission experiments were done in 25 cm3 reported. plastic-pots which were maintained in a humid atmos- Revue Neinatol. 9 (1) : 71-74 (1986) 71 D. J. E Brown phere in a temperature controlledcabinet (Taylor & the bait plants were tested for systemically translocated Brown, 1974) at 18' f 1' and with a minimum day- virus. The identity of the viruses recovered from selected length of 16hr. The proceduraldetails have been C. quinoaassay plants was confirmed serologically. Only published elsewhere (McElroy, Brown & Boag, 1977; those bait plants where the nematodewas recovered on Trudgill & Brown, 1978; Brown & Trudgill, 1983; completion of the bait period were used for compiling TrudGll, Brown & McNamara, 1983). Tables 1, 2 and 3. Petunia hybrida Vilm. was used as the virus-source and as the bait plants for AMV-T; Chenopodium qzdinoa Results Willd. was used with the two strains of SLRV. Groups of 35 virus-free X. diversicaudatum from the Scottish The type-British strain of AMVand SLRV were and the Italian populations, Ca. 50 O/O of the F1 hybrids transmitted by Ca. 70 O/o of the nematodes withScottish recovered fromthe pots inwhich reproduction had parentage (SSP1) but by less than 5 O/O of those with Italian occurred, or al1 of the F2 hybrids recovered from each parentage (IIPl). Hybrid nematodesof both generations pot were given access for four weeks to the virus-source (SIF1, SIFZ, ISFl & ISF2) transmitted AMV-T and plant. The ability of these nematodes to transmit virus SLRV-T with frequencies intermediate to those of the was examinedby transferring one nematode to each SSPl and IIPl nematodes (Tabs.1 and 2). SLRV-Ip was virus-free bait plant. Only juveniles (J3's & J4's) were recovered from only one of 57 and two of 30 bait plants used in the bait test as there were no adult F2 hybrids. exposed to IIPl and ISF2 nematodes respectively and After fourweeks the roots of the baitplants were tested was not recovered from bait plants exposed to SSP1, for the presenceof virus and the aerial parts of some of ISF1, SIFl and SIF2 nematodes (Tab. 3). Table 1 The transmission of the type-British strain of arabis mosaic virus by Xiphinema diversicaudatum from populations from Italy and Scotland and by reciprocally bred FI and F2 hybrids Pl parental, F1 parental and F2 grandparental ancesty Number of Proportion of nematodes transmis,sions* transmitting virus Female Male Pl Pl Italy Italy Italy 0.041 2/49** Scotland Scotland Scotland 0.798 67/84 F1 F2 F1 F2 Italy Scotland Italy 4/25 9/300.300 O. 160 Scotland Italy Scotland0.360 16/29 9/25 0.552 * One nematode per bait plant. ** Numerator is the number of bait plants infected, denominator is the number of plants tested. Table 3 The transmission of the type-British strain of strawberry latent ringspot virus by Xiphinema diversicaudatum from populations from Italy and Scotland and by reciprocally bred FI and F2 hybrids Pl parental, FI parentalNumber of Proportion of nematodes and F2and grandparental ancesty transmissions * transmittingvirus Female Pl Male Pl Italy Italy 1/57** 0.018 Scotland Scotland 54/77 0.701 F1 F2 FI F2 Italy Scotland0.300 5/230.217 9/30 Scotland Italy 012 1 4/27 < 0.048 0.148 * One nematode per bait plant. ** Numerator is the number of bait plants infected, denominator is the number of plants tested. 72 Revue Nématol. 9 (1) : 71-74 (1986) Transmission of virus by crosses of Xiphinema diversicaudatum Table 3 The transmission of a strain of strawberry latent ringspot virus isolated from Prunus persica L. growing in Italy by Xiphinema diversicaudatum from populations from Italy and Scotland and by reciprocally bred FI and F2 hybrids PI parental, FI parentalparental, FI PI Nunzber of Proportion of nematodes and F2 grandparental ancesty transmissions" transnzittingvirus Fentale Male PI P2 Italy Italy 1/57** 0.018 Scotland Scotland 0154 < 0.019 FI F2 F1 F2 Italy Scotland O123 2/30 < 0.043 0.067 Scotland Italy 011 1 0130 < 0.091 < 0.033 * One nematode per bait plant. ** Numerator is the number of bait plants infected, denominator is the number of plants tested. Proportionately, twice as many ISF2 and SIF2 nema- transmit viruses. Brown and Trudgill (1983) reported todestransmitted AMV-T and SLRV-T than did that therelatively infrequent transmission of viruses by ISFland SIFl nematodes. Similarly, twiceas many a populationof X. diversicaudatum from Italy (the same SIFl and SIF2 nematodes transmitted AMV-T than did as used in the present study) was associated with an ISFl and ISF2 nematodes,whereas, the reverse occurred apparent inability by thenematodes to retain virus with SLRV-T with nematodes with these same parent- particles. Harrison,Robertson and Taylor (1974) re- ages. ported that the proteincoat of virus particles was import- ant in thespecific transmissionof viruses by their vector nematodes. Therefore, it seems likely that the method of specific retention of viruses involves some character- Discussion istic of the protein coat of virus particles interacting or responding to some inherited characteristicof the cuticle The results of this study indicate that theability of X. lining the nematodes oesophagus. Carbohydrates, es- diversicaudatum to transmit AMV-T and SLRV-T is pecially sialic acid, gangliosides (charged glyco-lipids; inherited. The ability of hybrid nematodes to transmit Robertson & Wyss, 1983) and " mucus-like " material these viruses is affected by both materna1 and paternal (Taylor & Robertson, 1969, 1970; McGuire,Kim & parentage. The inherited ability of the hybrids to be Douthit, 1970; Robertson & Wyss, 1983) have been virus vectors may, therefore, be contained in the cyto- suggested as possibly being involved inthe specific plasm during fertilization. retention of viruses within nematode virusvectors. The Harrison and Murant(1984) suggested that theability inherent differences in the transmission of SLRV-Ip, of ISFl and ISF2 nematodes to transmit AMV-T and SLRV-T and AMV-T by hybrid X. diversicaudatum SLRV-T is controlled by a single dominant gene. The may be related to differences in the methodsof retention transmission of AMV-T by SIFl and SIF2 nematodes of these viruses within the nematode. do not show any single gene dominance effectswhereas their ability to transmit SLRV-T may be attributed to ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS a single recessive gene. However, the present data are notunequivocal evidence for either single gene or 1 thank Dr.F. Roca, Institut0 di NematologiaAgraria, polygenic controlof the ability of X.diversicaudatum to CNR, Bari, Italy for providing the population of X.
Recommended publications
  • Grapevine Virus Diseases: Economic Impact and Current Advances in Viral Prospection and Management1

    Grapevine Virus Diseases: Economic Impact and Current Advances in Viral Prospection and Management1

    1/22 ISSN 0100-2945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452017411 GRAPEVINE VIRUS DISEASES: ECONOMIC IMPACT AND CURRENT ADVANCES IN VIRAL PROSPECTION AND MANAGEMENT1 MARCOS FERNANDO BASSO2, THOR VINÍCIUS MArtins FAJARDO3, PASQUALE SALDARELLI4 ABSTRACT-Grapevine (Vitis spp.) is a major vegetative propagated fruit crop with high socioeconomic importance worldwide. It is susceptible to several graft-transmitted agents that cause several diseases and substantial crop losses, reducing fruit quality and plant vigor, and shorten the longevity of vines. The vegetative propagation and frequent exchanges of propagative material among countries contribute to spread these pathogens, favoring the emergence of complex diseases. Its perennial life cycle further accelerates the mixing and introduction of several viral agents into a single plant. Currently, approximately 65 viruses belonging to different families have been reported infecting grapevines, but not all cause economically relevant diseases. The grapevine leafroll, rugose wood complex, leaf degeneration and fleck diseases are the four main disorders having worldwide economic importance. In addition, new viral species and strains have been identified and associated with economically important constraints to grape production. In Brazilian vineyards, eighteen viruses, three viroids and two virus-like diseases had already their occurrence reported and were molecularly characterized. Here, we review the current knowledge of these viruses, report advances in their diagnosis and prospection of new species, and give indications about the management of the associated grapevine diseases. Index terms: Vegetative propagation, plant viruses, crop losses, berry quality, next-generation sequencing. VIROSES EM VIDEIRAS: IMPACTO ECONÔMICO E RECENTES AVANÇOS NA PROSPECÇÃO DE VÍRUS E MANEJO DAS DOENÇAS DE ORIGEM VIRAL RESUMO-A videira (Vitis spp.) é propagada vegetativamente e considerada uma das principais culturas frutíferas por sua importância socioeconômica mundial.
  • OCCURRENCE of STONE FRUIT VIRUSES in PLUM ORCHARDS in LATVIA Alina Gospodaryk*,**, Inga Moroèko-Bièevska*, Neda Pûpola*, and Anna Kâle*

    OCCURRENCE of STONE FRUIT VIRUSES in PLUM ORCHARDS in LATVIA Alina Gospodaryk*,**, Inga Moroèko-Bièevska*, Neda Pûpola*, and Anna Kâle*

    PROCEEDINGS OF THE LATVIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. Section B, Vol. 67 (2013), No. 2 (683), pp. 116–123. DOI: 10.2478/prolas-2013-0018 OCCURRENCE OF STONE FRUIT VIRUSES IN PLUM ORCHARDS IN LATVIA Alina Gospodaryk*,**, Inga Moroèko-Bièevska*, Neda Pûpola*, and Anna Kâle* * Latvia State Institute of Fruit-Growing, Graudu iela 1, Dobele LV-3701, LATVIA [email protected] ** Educational and Scientific Centre „Institute of Biology”, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 64 Volodymyrska Str., Kiev 01033, UKRAINE Communicated by Edîte Kaufmane To evaluate the occurrence of nine viruses infecting Prunus a large-scale survey and sampling in Latvian plum orchards was carried out. Occurrence of Apple mosaic virus (ApMV), Prune dwarf virus (PDV), Prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV), Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus (ACLSV), and Plum pox virus (PPV) was investigated by RT-PCR and DAS ELISA detection methods. The de- tection rates of both methods were compared. Screening of occurrence of Strawberry latent ringspot virus (SLRSV), Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV), Tomato ringspot virus (ToRSV) and Petunia asteroid mosaic virus (PeAMV) was performed by DAS-ELISA. In total, 38% of the tested trees by RT-PCR were infected at least with one of the analysed viruses. Among those 30.7% were in- fected with PNRSV and 16.4% with PDV, while ApMV, ACLSV and PPV were detected in few samples. The most widespread mixed infection was the combination of PDV+PNRSV. Observed symptoms characteristic for PPV were confirmed with RT-PCR and D strain was detected. Com- parative analyses showed that detection rates by RT-PCR and DAS ELISA in plums depended on the particular virus tested.
  • Virus Diseases of Trees and Shrubs

    Virus Diseases of Trees and Shrubs

    VirusDiseases of Treesand Shrubs Instituteof TerrestrialEcology NaturalEnvironment Research Council á Natural Environment Research Council Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Virus Diseases of Trees and Shrubs J.1. Cooper Institute of Terrestrial Ecology cfo Unit of Invertebrate Virology OXFORD Printed in Great Britain by Cambrian News Aberystwyth C Copyright 1979 Published in 1979 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecology 68 Hills Road Cambridge CB2 ILA ISBN 0-904282-28-7 The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE) was established in 1973, from the former Nature Conservancy's research stations and staff, joined later by the Institute of Tree Biology and the Culture Centre of Algae and Protozoa. ITE contributes to and draws upon the collective knowledge of the fourteen sister institutes \Which make up the Natural Environment Research Council, spanning all the environmental sciences. The Institute studies the factors determining the structure, composition and processes of land and freshwater systems, and of individual plant and animal species. It is developing a sounder scientific basis for predicting and modelling environmental trends arising from natural or man- made change. The results of this research are available to those responsible for the protection, management and wise use of our natural resources. Nearly half of ITE's work is research commissioned by customers, such as the Nature Con- servancy Council who require information for wildlife conservation, the Forestry Commission and the Department of the Environment. The remainder is fundamental research supported by NERC. ITE's expertise is widely used by international organisations in overseas projects and programmes of research. The photograph on the front cover is of Red Flowering Horse Chestnut (Aesculus carnea Hayne).
  • Arabis Mosaic Virus on Ornamental Plants

    Arabis Mosaic Virus on Ornamental Plants

    BIOLOGIJA. 2008. Vol. 54. No. 4. P. 264–268 DOI: 10.2478/v10054-008-0054-0 © Lietuvos mokslų akademija, 2008 © Lietuvos mokslų akademijos leidykla, 2008 Arabis mosaic virus on ornamental plants M. Samuitienė1*, Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV) is pathogenic to a wide variety of plant species including ornamen- tals. Using the methods of test-plants, electron microscopy, and DAS-ELISA, ArMV was identi- M. Navalinskienė1, fied in ornamental plant species of the genera Arum L., Camassia Lindl., Crocus L., Dahlia Cav., Dicentra Bernh., Dieffenbachia sp., Eryngium L., Liatris Gaertn. Ex Schreb., Lychnis L., E. Jackevičienė2 Muscari Mill., Iris L. and Phlox L., representing eight families. In naturally infected host plants, the virus was found in mixed infections with other viruses. Virus idenstity in five ornamental 1 Plant Virus Laboratory, species was confirmed by RT-PCR. Institute of Botany, Žaliųjų Ežerų 49, Key words: Arabis mosaic virus, ornamental plants, identification, DAS-ELISA, RT-PCR LT-08406 Vilnius, Lithuania 2 Phytosanitary Research Laboratory of Lithuanian Plant Protection Service, Sukilėlių 9a, LT-11351 Vilnius, Lithuania INTRODUCTION cies of wild and cultivated monocotyledonous and dicotyledo- nous plants. ArMV has been reported from numerous vegetable Recently, much attention has been given to the development of crops, sugar beet, strawberry, grapevine, olive, hop, cherry, black field floriculture in Lithuania. For small farmers, field floriculture currant [2, 5]. The effects of virus infection on field-infected is promising as family business. Farmers grow seedlings of per- plants ranged from symptomless to prominent foliar symp- ennial ornamental plants not only for Lithuanian domestic mar- toms, necrosis, stunting and death.
  • Effect of Fungicide Farmayod on Agrotechnical and Technological Indicators of Grapevine, on Viral Diseases and Oidium

    Effect of Fungicide Farmayod on Agrotechnical and Technological Indicators of Grapevine, on Viral Diseases and Oidium

    E3S Web of Conferences 273, 01020 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127301020 INTERAGROMASH 2021 Effect of fungicide farmayod on agrotechnical and technological indicators of grapevine, on viral diseases and oidium Nadezda Sirotkina1* 1All-Russian Research Institute named after Ya.I. Potapenko for Viticulture and Winemaking – Branch of Federal Rostov Agricultural Research Center, 346421, Novocherkassk, Russia Abstract. The paper presents the study on the effect of Farmayod’s GR (100 g/l of iodine) spraying on vineyards of Cabernet Sauvignon and Baklanovsky varieties on the degree of viral and oidium prevalence as well as on agrobiological and technological indicators. According to the aggregate agrobiological and technological indicators, the best results on Cabernet Sauvignon variety were obtained when the drug was used at a concentration of 0.06 %. On the Baklanovsky variety the best indicators were obtained at a drug concentration of 0.04%. Testing of plant samples for the presence of Grapevine fan leaf virus, Arabis mosaic virus and Oidium tuckeri showed that after two years of applying the drug, the prevalence of infected plants (P, %) with Grapevine fanleaf virus on the Cabernet Sauvignon cultivar varied from 0% (fungicide concentration 0.04 and 0.05 %) to 0.8 % (0.06 %) and 2.65 % (control). For Baklanovsky variety: Grapevine fanleaf virus - concentration 0.04 % - 1.8; 0.05 % - 0.4; 0.06 % - 2.0; control - 2.65 %. Arabis mosaic virus – 0; 0; 3.0; 12.1 %, respectively. Oidium tuckeri was 0 % in all variants with any drug concentrations. Control variant and later 80 % for 29.09. 1 Introduction The vine (Vitis spp.) is undoubtedly one of the woody crops most widely grown in temperate climates, and a very valuable agricultural commodity.
  • Arabis Mosaic Virus (Armv) ELISA Kit

    Arabis Mosaic Virus (Armv) ELISA Kit

    Version 01-06/20 User's Manual Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV) ELISA Kit DEIAPV61 5000T This product is for research use only and is not intended for diagnostic use. For illustrative purposes only. To perform the assay the instructions for use provided with the kit have to be used. Creative Diagnostics Address: 45-1 Ramsey Road, Shirley, NY 11967, USA Tel: 1-631-624-4882 (USA) 44-161-818-6441 (Europe) Fax: 1-631-938-8221 Email: [email protected] Web: www.creative-diagnostics.com Cat: DEIAPV61 Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV) ELISA Kit Version 29-06/20 PRODUCT INFORMATION Intended Use The test can be used to detect ArMV in any common host plants. General Description Arabis mosaic virus is a viral plant pathogen that is known to infect multiple hosts. The pathogen, commonly referred to as ArMV, is from the Secoviridae family, and it causes Raspberry yellow dwarf virus and Rhubarb mosaic virus. The Arabis Mosaic Virus infects multiple hosts, including strawberries, hop, hemp, grape and geraniums, raspberries, sugarbeets, celery, horseradish, lilac, peach and lettuces. While it is common for the hosts not to show any symptoms of the pathogens influence, there are some symptoms that can occur in the hosts. The most prevalent symptoms of the ArMV are stunting of the plant and leaf flecking/molting and leaf enations. The symptoms will vary based on the type of rootstock, environmental conditions and variety. Principles of Testing The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a serological solid-phase method for identification of diseases based on antibodies and color change in the assay.
  • Virus Diseases and Noninfectious Disorders of Stone Fruits in North America

    Virus Diseases and Noninfectious Disorders of Stone Fruits in North America

    / VIRUS DISEASES AND NONINFECTIOUS DISORDERS OF STONE FRUITS IN NORTH AMERICA Agriculture Handbook No. 437 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE VIRUS DISEASES AND NONINFECTIOUS DISORDERS OF STONE FRUITS IN NORTH AMERICA Agriculture Handbook No. 437 This handbook supersedes Agriculture Handbook 10, Virus Diseases and Other Disorders with Viruslike Symptoms of Stone Fruits in North America. Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C. ISSUED JANUARY 1976 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C 20402 — Price $7.10 (Paper Cover) Stock Number 0100-02691 FOREWORD The study of fruit tree virus diseases is a tedious process because of the time needed to produce experimental woody plants and, often, the long interval from inoculation until the development of diagnostic symptoms. The need for cooperation and interchange of information among investigators of these diseases has been apparent for a long time. As early as 1941, a conference was called by Director V. R. Gardner at Michigan State University to discuss the problem. One result of this early conference was the selection of a committee (E. M. Hildebrand, G. H. Berkeley, and D. Cation) to collect and classify both published and unpublished data on the nomenclature, symptoms, host range, geographical distribution, and other pertinent information on stone fruit virus diseases. This information was used to prepare a "Handbook of Stone Fruit Virus Diseases in North America," which was published in 1942 as a mis- cellaneous publication of the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station. At a second conference of stone fruit virus disease workers held in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1944 under the chairmanship of Director Gardner, a Publication Committee (D.
  • Current Developments and Challenges in Plant Viral Diagnostics: a Systematic Review

    Current Developments and Challenges in Plant Viral Diagnostics: a Systematic Review

    viruses Review Current Developments and Challenges in Plant Viral Diagnostics: A Systematic Review Gajanan T. Mehetre 1, Vincent Vineeth Leo 1 , Garima Singh 2 , Antonina Sorokan 3, Igor Maksimov 3, Mukesh Kumar Yadav 4, Kalidas Upadhyaya 5,*, Abeer Hashem 6,7, Asma N. Alsaleh 6 , Turki M. Dawoud 6, Khalid S. Almaary 6 and Bhim Pratap Singh 8,* 1 Department of Biotechnology, Mizoram University, Aizawl, Mizoram 796004, India; [email protected] (G.T.M.); [email protected] (V.V.L.) 2 Department of Botany, Pachhunga University College, Aizawl, Mizoram 796001, India; [email protected] 3 Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, pr. Oktyabrya 71, 450054 Ufa, Russia; [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (I.M.) 4 Department of Biotechnology, Pachhunga University College, Aizawl, Mizoram 796001, India; [email protected] 5 Department of Forestry, Mizoram University, Aizawl, Mizoram 796004, India 6 Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box. 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] (A.H.); [email protected] (A.N.A.); [email protected] (T.M.D.); [email protected] (K.S.A.) 7 Mycology and Plant Disease Survey Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, ARC, Giza 12511, Egypt 8 Department of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship & Management (NIFTEM), Industrial Estate, Kundli 131028, India * Correspondence: [email protected] (K.U.); [email protected] (B.P.S.); Tel.: +91-9436374242 (K.U.); Citation: Mehetre, G.T.; Leo, V.V.; +91-9436353807 (B.P.S.) Singh, G.; Sorokan, A.; Maksimov, I.; Yadav, M.K.; Upadhyaya, K.; Hashem, Abstract: Plant viral diseases are the foremost threat to sustainable agriculture, leading to several A.; Alsaleh, A.N.; Dawoud, T.M.; et al.
  • Data Sheet on Arabis Mosaic Nepovirus

    Data Sheet on Arabis Mosaic Nepovirus

    Prepared by CABI and EPPO for the EU under Contract 90/399003 Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests Arabis mosaic nepovirus IDENTITY Name: Arabis mosaic nepovirus Synonyms: Raspberry yellow dwarf virus Taxonomic position: Viruses: Comoviridae: Nepovirus Common names: ArMV (acronym) Arabis mosaic (English) EPPO computer code: ARMXXX EU Annex designation: II/A2 HOSTS ArMV has a wide host range including a number of important crop plants. When mechanically inoculated, 93 species from 28 dicotyledonous families were shown to be infected (Schmelzer, 1963). In a survey of alternative hosts for hop viruses, positive ELISA-readings were obtained in 33 out of 152 species tested (Eppler, 1989). Principal hosts are strawberries, hops, Vitis spp., raspberries (Rubus idaeus), Rheum spp. and Sambucus nigra. The virus has also been reported from sugarbeet, celery, Gladiolus, horseradish and lettuces. A number of other cultivated and wild species have been reported as hosts. All these crop hosts and many wild plant hosts occur throughout the EPPO region. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION EPPO region: Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus (found but not established), Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Moldova, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia (European, Far East), Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, UK, Ukraine and Yugoslavia. Asia: Japan, Kazakhstan, Russia (Far East), Turkey. Africa: South Africa. North America: Canada (British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec). Oceania: Australia (Tasmania, Victoria), New Zealand. EU: Present. BIOLOGY On the basis of polyclonal antisera, all ArMV strains known so far are closely related to one another and distantly related to grapevine fanleaf virus (GVFLV). The close relationship of ArMV and GVFLV (not only serologically) has given rise to the assumption that the two viruses may have the same origin, or even that GVFLV is the origin of ArMV (Hewitt, 1985).
  • Syringa Vulgarisis a New Host for Cucumber Mosaic Virus

    Syringa Vulgarisis a New Host for Cucumber Mosaic Virus

    Phytopathologia Mediterranea Firenze University Press The international journal of the www.fupress.com/pm Mediterranean Phytopathological Union New or Unusual Disease Reports Syringa vulgaris is a new host for cucumber mosaic virus Citation: Troiano E., Bellardi M.G., Parrella G. (2019) Syringa vulgaris is a new host for cucumber mosaic virus. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 58(2): Elisa TROIANO1, Maria Grazia BELLARDI1,2, Giuseppe PARRELLA1,* 385-389. doi: 10.14601/Phytopathol_ 1 Mediter-10625 Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante del CNR, IPSP-CNR, Via Università 133, 80055 Portici (Napoli), Italy Accepted: April 11, 2019 2 Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agro-Alimentari (DISTAL), Patologia Vegetale, Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Viale G. Fanin 44, 40127 Bologna, Italy Published: September 14, 2019 *Corresponding author: [email protected] Copyright: © 2019 Troiano E., Bel- lardi M.G., Parrella G. This is an open Summary. Virus-like symptoms consisting of light mosaic, chlorotic spots and oak access, peer-reviewed article published by Firenze University Press (http:// chlorotic line patterns were observed on lilac plants (Syringa vulgaris L.) growing in a www.fupress.com/pm) and distributed public garden in Imola (Emilia Romagna region, Italy). The causal agent was identified under the terms of the Creative Com- as cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) on the basis of biological, serological and nucleo- mons Attribution License, which per- tide sequence properties of partial coat protein and movement protein genes, and the mits unrestricted use, distribution, and isolate was designated SYV. The CMV-SYV isolate caused mosaic symptoms on indica- reproduction in any medium, provided tor plants of Nicotiana tabacum cv.
  • Plant Viruses Infecting Solanaceae Family Members in the Cultivated and Wild Environments: a Review

    Plant Viruses Infecting Solanaceae Family Members in the Cultivated and Wild Environments: a Review

    plants Review Plant Viruses Infecting Solanaceae Family Members in the Cultivated and Wild Environments: A Review Richard Hanˇcinský 1, Daniel Mihálik 1,2,3, Michaela Mrkvová 1, Thierry Candresse 4 and Miroslav Glasa 1,5,* 1 Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Nám. J. Herdu 2, 91701 Trnava, Slovakia; [email protected] (R.H.); [email protected] (D.M.); [email protected] (M.M.) 2 Institute of High Mountain Biology, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia 3 National Agricultural and Food Centre, Research Institute of Plant Production, Bratislavská cesta 122, 92168 Piešt’any, Slovakia 4 INRAE, University Bordeaux, UMR BFP, 33140 Villenave d’Ornon, France; [email protected] 5 Biomedical Research Center of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Virology, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84505 Bratislava, Slovakia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +421-2-5930-2447 Received: 16 April 2020; Accepted: 22 May 2020; Published: 25 May 2020 Abstract: Plant viruses infecting crop species are causing long-lasting economic losses and are endangering food security worldwide. Ongoing events, such as climate change, changes in agricultural practices, globalization of markets or changes in plant virus vector populations, are affecting plant virus life cycles. Because farmer’s fields are part of the larger environment, the role of wild plant species in plant virus life cycles can provide information about underlying processes during virus transmission and spread. This review focuses on the Solanaceae family, which contains thousands of species growing all around the world, including crop species, wild flora and model plants for genetic research.
  • Identification of Some Viruses Causing Mosaic on Lettuce and Characterization of Lettuce Mosaic Virus from Tehran Province in Iran

    Identification of Some Viruses Causing Mosaic on Lettuce and Characterization of Lettuce Mosaic Virus from Tehran Province in Iran

    African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 6(13), pp. 3029-3035, 4 July, 2011 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.114 ISSN 1991-637X ©2011 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Identification of some viruses causing mosaic on lettuce and characterization of Lettuce mosaic virus from Tehran Province in Iran Parisa Soleimani 1*, Gholamhossein Mosahebi 2 and Mina Koohi Habibi 2 1Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Dezful Branch, Islamic Azad university, Khuzestan, Iran. 2Department of Plant Pathology and Entomology, College of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. Accepted 19 May, 2011 Lettuce mosaic virus (LMV) , Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) were identified in lettuce fields in Tehran province. In this study, 452 infected lettuce plants having viral infection symptoms including, mosaic, mottling, leaf distortion, stunting defective heading, were collected from the fields throughout Tehran province. Distribution of Lettuce mosaic virus (LMV), Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) and Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV) were determined with DAS-ELISA. LMV, CMV and TSWV were found on lettuce in this region, but no infection by ArMV was found. Percentage of single infection by LMV, CMV or TSWV was 21, 16 and 10% respectively. Also, 16% of samples were co-infected with LMV+CMV, 8% with LMV+TSWV and 8% with CMV+TSWV. 5% of samples were infected to all of these viruses. LMV was found in 49%, CMV in 44% and TSWV in 31% of samples totally. Therefore, LMV is major agent of lettuce mosaic disease in Tehran province.