Miller–Dieker Syndrome, Type 1 Lissencephaly

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Miller–Dieker Syndrome, Type 1 Lissencephaly Journal of Perinatology (2008) 28, 313–315 r 2008 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved. 0743-8346/08 $30 www.nature.com/jp IMAGING CASE BOOK Miller–Dieker syndrome, type 1 lissencephaly TE Herman and MJ Siegel Department of Radiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA Journal of Perinatology (2008) 28, 313–315; doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211920 bitemporal shallowness. The ears were low set. Retromicrognathia, and microphthalmia, more marked on the left, were also present. Case presentation The child had a cranial sonogram (Figure 1) and cranial magnetic A 1910 g infant was born at 41-weeks gestation to a 19-year-old resonance imaging (Figure 2). gravida 1 mother after a pregnancy complicated by hydramnios and poor fetal movement. The child was delivered by a cesarean section because of fetal decelerations with labor. Severe intrauterine Denouement and discussion growth retardation was present with the infant’s weight, length and The cranial sonogram demonstrated an abnormally smooth brain head circumference all less than the tenth percentile for gestational with no gyration or sulcation with a wide, shallow sylvian fissure age. The patient’s head demonstrated a wasted appearance with creating a figure-of-8 appearance. The absence of all gyri is Figure 1 (a) Coronal cranial sonogram at the level of the third ventricle demonstrating a figure-of-8 appearance of the brain with wide sylvian fissure and with no sulci or gyri. (b) Sagittal right lateral cranial sonogram demonstrating absence of gyri over the ipsilateral hemisphere. (c) Right sagittal sonogram demonstrating echogenic linear thalamostriate vessels (arrow). The left hemisphere had a similar appearance. (d) Sagittal left lateral sonogram demonstrating absent sulci, gyri. Correspondence: Dr TE Herman, Department of Radiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 South Kingshighway Boulevard, St Louis, MO 63110, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Received 5 November 2007; accepted 28 November 2007 Miller–Dieker syndrome TE Herman and MJ Siegel 314 Figure 2 (a) T2-weighted coronal MRI and (b). T2-weighed axial MRI views of the brain. There is a thickened cortex without gyri or sulci and a figure-of-8 appearance of the brain with a wide, shallow sylvian fissure (arrows). (c) Posterior coronal T2-weighed images demonstrating a left parafalcine arachnoid cyst (AC). (d) T1-weighted image through the orbits demonstrating left microphthalmia (arrow). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging. referred to as lissencephaly (smooth brain).1 The corpus callosum migrational abnormality with a thickened, smooth cerebral cortex, was incompletely formed. In addition, at cranial sonography there failure of opercularization (closure of the sylvian fissure to cover were echogenic thalamostriate vessels, or so-called thalamostriate the insula), colprocephaly and occasional calcifications of the vasculopathy. The magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated the septum pellucidum.2 At birth, there is usually a normal head partial agenesis of the corpus callosum, lissencephaly, left circumference or a head circumference within 2 s.d. of normal.1 microphthalmia and a small arachnoid cyst along the parafalcine Four genes are known to be associated with classical lissencephaly: left parietooccipital cortex. The cerebral cortex, usually measuring LIS1, DCX, ARX and TUBA3. LIS1 gene, located at 17p3, is known less than 3 mm, measured over 5 mm. The colprocephaly and to be necessary for the neuronal precursors to undergo normal incomplete opercularization with wide shallow sylvian fissures were neuronogenesis and migration. Miller–Dieker syndrome is noted to produce a figure-of-8 appearance to the brain. This associated with 17p3 deletions, usually with complete absence of appearance is typical of classical or type 1 lissencephaly.1,2 the LIS1 gene, and it is the most common cause of classical Chromosomal analysis of the infant demonstrated a deletion of lissencephaly. Norman–Roberts syndrome is an autosomal 17p3, confirming a diagnosis of Miller–Dieker syndrome with recessive condition associated with type 1 lissencephaly, but with type 1 lissencephaly. severe microcephaly (less than 3 s.d. below normal). Type 2 Lissencephaly is a rare condition. Three types have been lissencephaly, so-called cobblestone lissencephaly, has a granular described.1 Type l or classical lissencephaly is a neuronal surface with effacement of gyri. It is found in the autosomal Journal of Perinatology Miller–Dieker syndrome TE Herman and MJ Siegel 315 recessive conditions: Walker–Warbury syndrome and seizures (90% by 1 year of age) and profound neurodevelopmental Fukuyama syndrome. Type 2 lissencephaly is associated with retardation. O-glycosylation enzyme defects resulting in abnormal laminin. The differential diagnosis of Miller–Dieker syndrome includes Type 3 lissencephaly is associated with severe microcephaly and other syndromes, with facial dysmorphism, microcephaly, is a neurodegenerative process with abnormal apoptosis. It seizures and hypotonia, such as Cornelia de Lange syndrome, occurs in the Neu–Laxova and Encha Razavi Larroche Wolf–Hirschorn syndrome, Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome and syndromes. Zellweger syndrome.8 However, none of these have lissencephaly. The clinical appearance of children with Miller–Dieker Chromosomal analysis to show a 17p3 deletion reliably excludes syndrome is characteristic. There is a high forehead, often with other causes of type 1 lissencephaly. The syndromes with types 2 vertical furrows, due to an unusual ability to wrinkle the skin of and 3 lissencephaly have associated typical manifestations and can the forehead.1,3 The ears are low set and the eyes widely separated. be usually easily excluded. Type 2 lissencephaly is a specific The upper lip is thickened, but with a thin vermillion border. There component of Walker–Warbur syndrome, Fukuyama congenital is an elongated philtrum with rounded pillars. There is bitemporal muscular dystrophy and some other familial syndromes. Type 3 narrowing and the nose is short and anteverted.4 The degree of lissencephaly occurs in association with stippled epiphyses and agyria in lissencephaly may vary and has been stratified by Dobyns metacarpal-phalangeal bone dysplasia. into six different grades of severity.1,5 Grade 1, as occurred in this Treatment of Miller–Dieker syndrome is usually antiepileptic patient, is complete agyria. Grade 2 has some minimal gyration in medications and support. Death usually occurs within the first year the frontal region. The remaining grades have decreasing extent of life.6 agyria and increased pachygyria or abnormally broad gyri. The magnetic resonance imaging and sonographic appearance References of the brain in this patient are characteristic of Miller–Dieker syndrome. However, several additional imaging features were 1 Verloes A, Elmaleh M, Gonzales M, Laquerriere A, Gressens P. Lissence´phalies: aspects present in this patient not described, to our knowledge, in other cliniques et ge´ne´tiqes. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2007; 163: 533–547. 2 Williams JP, Joslyn JN. Lissencephaly: computed tomographic diagnosis. J Computed patients with Miller–Dieker syndrome. These include the presence Tomography 1983; 7: 141–144. of thalamostriate vasculopathy, arachnoid cyst and 3 Dobyns WB, Stratton RF, Parke JT, Greenberg F, Nussbaum RL, Ledbetter DH. microophthalmia. Thalamostriate vasculopathy on transcranial Miller–Dieker syndrome: lissencephaly and monosomy 17p. J Pediatrics 1983; 102: sonography has been reported in TORCH infections, particularly 552–564. cytomegalovirus infection, trisomy 13, translocation chromosome 4 Allanson JE, Ledbetter DH, Dobyns WB. Classical lissencephaly syndromes: does the face 11 and various other metabolic and dysmorphic syndromes.6 reflect the brain? J Med Genet 1998; 35: 920–923. 5 Uyanik G, Morris-Rosendahl DJ, Stiegler J, Klapecki J, Gross C, Berman Y et al. Location Intracranial subarachnoid cysts are usually supratentorial, and type of mutation in the LIS1 gene do not predict phenotypic severity. Neurology but primarily in the temporal fossa and not parafalcine as in 2007; 69: 442–447. this patient.7 Although microphthalmia is common in type 2 6 EI Ayoubi M, de Bethmann O, Monset-Couchard M. Lenticulostriate Echogenic lissencephaly syndromes, it is not a frequent finding in vessels: clinical and sonographic study of 70 neonatal cases. Pediatr Radiol 2003; 33: Miller–Dieker syndrome. 697–703. 7 Osborn AG, Preece MT. Intracranial cysts: radiologic-pathologic correlation and imaging The clinical presentation of children with grade 1 type 1 approach. Radiology 2006; 239: 650–664. lissencephaly is also usually typical. They are hypotonic at birth, 8 Rivas MV, Alvarez LA, Altman N. Pictoral review: Miller Dieker syndrome. Int Pediat but quickly develop spasticity. They have difficulties in swallowing, 1994; 9: 280–283. Journal of Perinatology.
Recommended publications
  • Bhagwan Moorjani, MD, FAAP, FAAN • Requires Knowledge of Normal CNS Developmental (I.E
    1/16/2012 Neuroimaging in Childhood • Neuroimaging issues are distinct from Pediatric Neuroimaging in adults Neurometabolic-degenerative disorder • Sedation/anesthesia and Epilepsy • Motion artifacts Bhagwan Moorjani, MD, FAAP, FAAN • Requires knowledge of normal CNS developmental (i.e. myelin maturation) • Contrast media • Parental anxiety Diagnostic Approach Neuroimaging in Epilepsy • Age of onset • Peak incidence in childhood • Static vs Progressive • Occurs as a co-morbid condition in many – Look for treatable causes pediatric disorders (birth injury, – Do not overlook abuse, Manchausen if all is negative dysmorphism, chromosomal anomalies, • Phenotype presence (syndromic, HC, NCS, developmental delays/regression) systemic involvement) • Predominant symptom (epilepsy, DD, • Many neurologic disorders in children weakness/motor, psychomotor regression, have the same chief complaint cognitive/dementia) 1 1/16/2012 Congenital Malformation • Characterized by their anatomic features • Broad categories: based on embryogenesis – Stage 1: Dorsal Induction: Formation and closure of the neural tube. (Weeks 3-4) – Stage 2: Ventral Induction: Formation of the brain segments and face. (Weeks 5-10) – Stage 3: Migration and Histogenesis: (Months 2-5) – Stage 4: Myelination: (5-15 months; matures by 3 years) Dandy Walker Malformation Dandy walker • Criteria: – high position of tentorium – dysgenesis/agenesis of vermis – cystic dilatation of fourth ventricle • commonly associated features: – hypoplasia of cerebellum – scalloping of inner table of occipital bone • associated abnormalities: – hydrocephalus 75% – dysgenesis of corpus callosum 25% – heterotropia 10% 2 1/16/2012 Etiology of Epilepsy: Developmental and Genetic Classification of Gray Matter Heterotropia Cortical Dysplasia 1. Secondary to abnormal neuronal and • displaced masses of nerve cells • Subependymal glial proliferation/apoptosis (gray matter) heterotropia (most • most common: small nest common) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 1Q21.1 Duplication Syndrome and Epilepsy Case Report and Review
    CLINICAL/SCIENTIFIC NOTES OPEN ACCESS 1q21.1 Duplication syndrome and epilepsy Case report and review Ioulia Gourari, MD, Romaine Schubert, MD, and Aparna Prasad, PhD Correspondence Dr. Gourari Neurol Genet 2018;4:e219. doi:10.1212/NXG.0000000000000219 [email protected] Copy number variants (CNVs) of 1q21.1 are increasingly being recognized due to the wide- spread use of genetic screening tests for the investigation of developmental disorders and epilepsy. These include microdeletion and microduplication syndromes, associated with a wide variety of pathology including autism spectrum disorders, attention-deficit disorder, learning disabilities, hypotonia, facial dysmorphisms, and schizophrenia. The 1q21.1 region is consid- ered to be genetically unstable because it contains one of the largest areas of identical dupli- cation sequences in the human genome. Epilepsy has been reported in the literature, particularly in microdeletion syndromes, but rarely in association with microduplication syn- dromes. We report a patient with epilepsy and autism spectrum disorder due to a distal 1q21.1 microduplication and review the available literature and genetic information. Case report We present a 10-year-old girl with a low-functioning autism spectrum disorder and focal motor epilepsy. On examination, she has hypertelorism, minimal communicative language skills, and severe macrocephaly (HC = 57 cm, 3.6 SD > 99%). Seizures started at 7 years of age and consisted of head deviation to the left, generalized stiffening, clonic activity of the mouth, and fluttering of the eyelids, lasting for 1–2 minutes. Multiple video EEG recordings showed a right temporal focus with a less active, independent left temporal focus. 3T MRI scan of the brain was normal.
    [Show full text]
  • Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly
    277 Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly KellenD.Winden,MD,PhD1 Christopher J. Yuskaitis, MD, PhD1 Annapurna Poduri, MD, MPH2 1 Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Address for correspondence Annapurna Poduri, Epilepsy Genetics Massachusetts Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2 Epilepsy Genetics Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Department of Neurology, Fegan 9, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Electrophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (e-mail: [email protected]). Semin Neurol 2015;35:277–287. Abstract Megalencephaly is a developmental disorder characterized by brain overgrowth secondary to increased size and/or numbers of neurons and glia. These disorders can be divided into metabolic and developmental categories based on their molecular etiologies. Metabolic megalencephalies are mostly caused by genetic defects in cellular metabolism, whereas developmental megalencephalies have recently been shown to be caused by alterations in signaling pathways that regulate neuronal replication, growth, and migration. These disorders often lead to epilepsy, developmental disabilities, and Keywords behavioral problems; specific disorders have associations with overgrowth or abnor- ► megalencephaly malities in other tissues. The molecular underpinnings of many of these disorders are ► hemimegalencephaly now understood, providing insight into how dysregulation of critical pathways leads to ►
    [Show full text]
  • Lissencephaly
    LE JOURNAL CANADIEN DES SCIENCES NEUROLOGIQUES Lissencephaly MARGARET G. NORMAN, MAUREEN ROBERTS, J. SIROIS, L. J. M. TREMBLAY SUMMARY: The first reported case of tic heterogeneity. Lissencephaly and INTRODUCTION lissencephaly resulting from a consan- pachygyria may eventually be shown to Lissencephaly (agyria) is charac­ guinous union strengthens the supposi­ be due to different causes, some inher­ terized by a smooth brain, without tion that in some cases, it is transmitted ited, some acquired. The classical ex­ sulci or gyri. The microscopic as an autosomal recessive trait. Com­ amples of lissencephaly are different parison of this case with a sporadically morphologically from a case in which an­ anatomy of the cortex varies, some occuring case of lissencephaly, with dif­ tenatal cytomegalovirus infection had cases showing no laminae, others ferent cortical morphology, suggests produced a small smooth brain. This four laminae. Associated abnormal - that lissencephaly may be an example of suggests that antenatal viral infections ities are masses of heterotopic grey either varying gene expressivity or gene- are destructive rather than teratogenic. matter around the ventricles. Heterotopias of the inferior olivary nuclei and cerebellar roof nuclei are RESUME: Le premier cas de ment, il sera peut-etre demontre que la frequently present. Pachygyria is a lissencephalie resultant d'une union lissencephalie et la pachygyrie sont dues morphologically similar anomaly in consanguine renforcit I'hypothese qu'au a des causes differentes, certaines etant which the brain has wide simple moins dans certain cas la lissencephalie hereditaires, d'autres etant acquises. est transmise par un trait autosomal Les examples classiques de gyri. Some have regarded lissence­ recessif.
    [Show full text]
  • Supratentorial Brain Malformations
    Supratentorial Brain Malformations Edward Yang, MD PhD Department of Radiology Boston Children’s Hospital 1 May 2015/ SPR 2015 Disclosures: Consultant, Corticometrics LLC Objectives 1) Review major steps in the morphogenesis of the supratentorial brain. 2) Categorize patterns of malformation that result from failure in these steps. 3) Discuss particular imaging features that assist in recognition of these malformations. 4) Reference some of the genetic bases for these malformations to be discussed in greater detail later in the session. Overview I. Schematic overview of brain development II. Abnormalities of hemispheric cleavage III. Commissural (Callosal) abnormalities IV. Migrational abnormalities - Gray matter heterotopia - Pachygyria/Lissencephaly - Focal cortical dysplasia - Transpial migration - Polymicrogyria V. Global abnormalities in size (proliferation) VI. Fetal Life and Myelination Considerations I. Schematic Overview of Brain Development Embryology Top Mid-sagittal Top Mid-sagittal Closed Neural Tube (4 weeks) Corpus Callosum Callosum Formation Genu ! Splenium Cerebral Hemisphere (11-20 weeks) Hemispheric Cleavage (4-6 weeks) Neuronal Migration Ventricular/Subventricular Zones Ventricle ! Cortex (8-24 weeks) Neuronal Precursor Generation (Proliferation) (6-16 weeks) Embryology From ten Donkelaar Clinical Neuroembryology 2010 4mo 6mo 8mo term II. Abnormalities of Hemispheric Cleavage Holoprosencephaly (HPE) Top Mid-sagittal Imaging features: Incomplete hemispheric separation + 1)1) No septum pellucidum in any HPEs Closed Neural
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Birth Defects Program Resource Guide
    South Carolina Birth Defects Program Resource Guide A South Carolina where healthy births are promoted, every birth defect matters, and families impacted by birth defects are supported. Table Of Contents Introduction Introduction 1 Thousands of families in South Carolina have been impacted by a birth defect. Birth defects are structural changes which are already there when a baby is born that can affect any part of the body (e.g., heart, brain, South Carolina Birth Defects Program Mission and Vision 2 foot). They may affect how the body looks, works, or both. Birth defects can vary from mild to severe. The well-being of each child affected with a birth defect depends mostly on which organ or body part is involved, General Information on Birth Defects in South Carolina 4 how much it is affected, early detection, and timely entry into Early Intervention services. Cardiovascular (Heart) Birth Defects in South Carolina 5 Learning that a child has a birth defect can be difficult for a family. Families often feel alone when they find out about a birth defect. They are not alone. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, birth Interview with a Parent of a Child with a Critical Congenital Heart Birth Defect 7 defects affect 1 in 33 babies born every year and cause 1 in 5 infant deaths. In 2004, South Carolina government officials created a way to track these important conditions through a law called “The South Carolina Birth Orofacial Birth Defects 11 Defects Act.” The South Carolina Birth Defects Program (SCBDP) was created through this law.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectrum of Clinical and Associated MR Imaging Findings in Children with Olfactory Anomalies
    Published March 17, 2016 as 10.3174/ajnr.A4738 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PEDIATRICS Spectrum of Clinical and Associated MR Imaging Findings in Children with Olfactory Anomalies X T.N. Booth and X N.K. Rollins ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The olfactory apparatus, consisting of the bulb and tract, is readily identifiable on MR imaging. Anom- alous development of the olfactory apparatus may be the harbinger of anomalies of the secondary olfactory cortex and associated structures. We report a large single-site series of associated MR imaging findings in patients with olfactory anomalies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search of radiologic reports (2010 through 2014) was performed by using the keyword “olfactory”; MR imaging studies were reviewed for olfactory anomalies and intracranial and skull base malformations. Medical records were reviewed for clinical symptoms, neuroendocrine dysfunction, syndromic associations, and genetics. RESULTS: We identified 41 patients with olfactory anomalies (range, 0.03–18 years of age; M/F ratio, 19:22); olfactory anomalies were bilateral in 31 of 41 patients (76%) and absent olfactory bulbs and olfactory tracts were found in 56 of 82 (68%). Developmental delay was found in 24 (59%), and seizures, in 14 (34%). Pituitary dysfunction was present in 14 (34%), 8 had panhypopituitarism, and 2 had isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. CNS anomalies, seen in 95% of patients, included hippocampal dysplasia in 26, cortical malformations in 15, malformed corpus callosum in 10, and optic pathway hypoplasia in 12. Infratentorial anomalies were seen in 15 (37%) patients and included an abnormal brain stem in 9 and an abnormal cerebellum in 3. Four patients had an abnormal membranous labyrinth.
    [Show full text]
  • Endosomal Trafficking Defects Alter Neural Progenitor Proliferation And
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.254037; this version posted August 17, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 2 Endosomal trafficking defects alter neural progenitor proliferation 3 and cause microcephaly 4 5 Jacopo A. Carpentieri1, Amandine Di Cicco1, David Andreau1, Laurence Del Maestro2, Fatima 6 El Marjou1, Laure Coquand1, Jean-Baptiste Brault1, Nadia Bahi-Buisson3, Alexandre D. 7 Baffet1,4,# 8 9 1- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR144, 75005 Paris, France 10 2- Centre Épigénétique et destin cellulaire, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 7216, 75013 Paris, 11 France 12 3- INSERM U1163, Institut Imagine, Necker Hospital, 75015 Paris, France 13 4- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (Inserm) 14 # Corresponding author: [email protected] 15 16 Abstract 17 Primary microcephaly and megalencephaly are severe brain malformations defined by reduced 18 and increased brain size, respectively. Whether these two pathologies arise from related alterations at 19 the molecular level is unclear. Microcephaly has been largely associated with centrosomal defects, 20 leading to cell death. Here, we investigated the consequences of WDR81 loss of function, which cause 21 severe microcephaly in patients. We show that WDR81 regulates endosomal trafficking of EGFR, 22 and that loss of function leads to reduced MAP kinase pathway activation. Mouse radial glial 23 progenitor cells knocked-out for WDR81 display reduced proliferation rates, leading to reduced brain 24 size.
    [Show full text]
  • WES Gene Package Disorders of Sex Development (DSD)
    Whole Exome Sequencing Gene package Disorders of Sex Development (DSD), version 7, 18‐2‐2019 Technical information DNA was enriched using Agilent SureSelect Clinical Research Exome V2 capture and paired‐end sequenced on the Illumina platform (outsourced). The aim is to obtain 8.1 Giga base pairs per exome with a mapped fraction of 0.99. The average coverage of the exome is ~50x. Duplicate reads are excluded. Data are demultiplexed with bcl2fastq Conversion Software from Illumina. Reads are mapped to the genome using the BWA‐MEM algorithm (reference: http://bio‐bwa.sourceforge.net/). Variant detection is performed by the Genome Analysis Toolkit HaplotypeCaller (reference: http://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/). The detected variants are filtered and annotated with Cartagenia software and classified with Alamut Visual. It is not excluded that pathogenic mutations are being missed using this technology. At this moment, there is not enough information about the sensitivity of this technique with respect to the detection of deletions and duplications of more than 5 nucleotides and of somatic mosaic mutations (all types of sequence changes). HGNC approved Phenotype description including OMIM phenotype ID(s) OMIM median depth % covered % covered % covered gene symbol gene ID >10x >20x >30x AKR1C1 No OMIM phenotype 600449 90 100 100 96 AKR1C4 {46XY sex reversal 8, modifier of}, 614279 600451 59 100 98 91 AMH Persistent Mullerian duct syndrome, type I, 261550 600957 97 100 100 100 AMHR2 Persistent Mullerian duct syndrome, type II, 261550 600956
    [Show full text]
  • Proximal Microdeletions and Microduplications of 1Q21.1 Contribute to Variable Abnormal Phenotypes
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2012) 20, 754–761 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1018-4813/12 www.nature.com/ejhg ARTICLE Proximal microdeletions and microduplications of 1q21.1 contribute to variable abnormal phenotypes Jill A Rosenfeld1, Ryan N Traylor1, G Bradley Schaefer2, Elizabeth W McPherson3, Blake C Ballif1, Eva Klopocki4, Stefan Mundlos4, Lisa G Shaffer*,1 and Arthur S Aylsworth5, 1q21.1 Study Group6 Chromosomal band 1q21.1 can be divided into two distinct regions, proximal and distal, based on segmental duplications that mediate recurrent rearrangements. Microdeletions and microduplications of the distal region within 1q21.1, which are susceptibility factors for a variety of neurodevelopmental phenotypes, have been more extensively studied than proximal microdeletions and microduplications. Proximal microdeletions are known as a susceptibility factor for thrombocytopenia-absent radius (TAR) syndrome, but it is unclear if these proximal microdeletions have other phenotypic consequences. Therefore, to elucidate the clinical significance of rearrangements of the proximal 1q21.1 region, we evaluated the phenotypes in patients identified with 1q21.1 rearrangements after referral for clinical microarray testing. We report clinical information for 55 probands with copy number variations (CNVs) involving proximal 1q21.1: 22 microdeletions and 20 reciprocal microduplications limited to proximal 1q21.1 and 13 microdeletions that include both the proximal and distal regions. Six individuals with proximal microdeletions have TAR syndrome. Three individuals with proximal microdeletions and two individuals with larger microdeletions of proximal and distal 1q21.1 have a ‘partial’ TAR phenotype. Furthermore, one subject with TAR syndrome has a smaller, atypical deletion, narrowing the critical deletion region for the syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint Genetics Neuronal Migration Disorder Panel
    Neuronal Migration Disorder Panel Test code: MA2601 Is a 59 gene panel that includes assessment of non-coding variants. Is ideal for patients with a clinical suspicion of neuronal migration disorder. About Neuronal Migration Disorder Neuronal migration disorders (NMDs) are a group of birth defects caused by the abnormal migration of neurons in the developing brain and nervous system. During development, neurons must migrate from the areas where they are originate to the areas where they will settle into their proper neural circuits. The structural abnormalities found in NMDs include schizencephaly, porencephaly, lissencephaly, agyria, macrogyria, polymicrogyria, pachygyria, microgyria, micropolygyria, neuronal heterotopias, agenesis of the corpus callosum, and agenesis of the cranial nerves. Mutations of many genes are involved in neuronal migration disorders, such as DCX in classical lissencephaly spectrum, TUBA1A in microlissencephaly with agenesis of the corpus callosum, and RELN and VLDLR in lissencephaly with cerebellar hypoplasia. Mutations in ARX cause a variety of phenotypes ranging from hydranencephaly or lissencephaly to early-onset epileptic encephalopathies, including Ohtahara syndrome and infantile spasms or intellectual disability with no brain malformations. Availability 4 weeks Gene Set Description Genes in the Neuronal Migration Disorder Panel and their clinical significance Gene Associated phenotypes Inheritance ClinVar HGMD ACTB* Baraitser-Winter syndrome AD 55 60 ACTG1* Deafness, Baraitser-Winter syndrome AD 27 47 ADGRG1
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Diagnosis/Conditions for Eligibility in AEIS
    Medical Diagnosis/Conditions for Eligibility in AEIS 1) Achondroplasia 2) Agenesis of Corpus Callosum 3) Agyria (Lissencephaly) 4) Albinism 5) Amniotic Band syndrome 6) Anencephaly 7) Angelman’s syndrome 8) Anophthalmia 9) Apert syndrome 10) Aplasia of the brain (brain malformation/abnormality) 11) Arhinencephaly (Holoprosencephaly) 12) Arnold-Chiari syndrome 13) Arthrogryposis 14) Asperger syndrome/disorder 15) Asphyxiating Thoracic Dystrophy (Jeune syndrome) 16) Attachment disorder 17) Autism/Autism Spectrum disorder 18) Bardet-Biedl syndrome 19) Brain injury/degeneration 20) Brain malformation/abnormality 21) Cerebral Palsy (all types) 22) CHARGE syndrome 23) Chiari Malformation 24) Childhood Depression 25) Childhood Disintegrative disorder 26) Cornelia de Lange syndrome 27) Cortical vision impairment (vision loss/impairment) 28) Cri-du-Chat syndrome 29) Cytomegalovirus (CMV) 30) Dandy Walker syndrome/variant 31) De Morsier syndrome (Septo-Optic Dysplasia) 32) Developmental Apraxia 33) DiGeorge syndrome 34) Dilantin syndrome (Fetal Hydantoin syndrome) 35) Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21) 36) Edwards syndrome (Trisomy 18) 37) Encephalomalacia 38) Encephalopathy 39) Epilepsy (seizure disorder) 40) Fetal Alcohol syndrome 41) Fetal Hydantoin syndrome (Dilantin syndrome) 42) Fragile X syndrome 43) Genetic/Chromosomal malformation/abnormality (not listed) 44) Hearing Loss/Impairment 45) Heart Disease/Defect (not listed) 46) Hemiplegia 47) Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) 48) Holoprosencephaly (Arhinencephaly) 49) Holt Oram syndrome 50) Hydraencephaly
    [Show full text]