Protein Interaction Networks and Their Applications to Protein Characterization and Cancer Genes Prediction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Protein Interaction Networks and Their Applications to Protein Characterization and Cancer Genes Prediction Ramón Aragüés Peleato Protein interaction networks and their applications to protein characterization and cancer genes prediction PhD Thesis Barcelona, May 2007 1 The image of the cover shows the happiness protein interaction network (i.e. the protein interaction network for proteins involved in the serotonin pathway) ii Protein Interaction Networks and their Applications to Protein Characterization and Cancer Genes Prediction Ramón Aragüés Peleato Memòria presentada per optar al grau de Doctor en Biologia per la Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Aquesta Tesi Doctoral ha estat realitzada sota la direcció del Dr. Baldo Oliva al Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut de la Universitat Pompeu Fabra Baldo Oliva Miguel Ramón Aragüés Peleato Barcelona, Maig 2007 The research in this thesis has been carried out at the Structural Bioinformatics Lab (SBI) within the Grup de Recerca en Informàtica Biomèdica at the Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona (PRBB). The research carried out in this thesis has been supported by a “Formación de Personal Investigador (FPI)” grant from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia awarded to Dr. Baldo Oliva. A mis padres, que me hicieron querer conseguirlo A Natalia, que me ayudó a conseguir hacerlo ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................................ III THESIS ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................................V CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................7 1.1 INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................9 1.2 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................9 1.2.1 Molecular cell biology.......................................................................................................................9 1.2.2 Bioinformatics and Computational Biology ....................................................................................11 1.3 GENOMICS AND PROTEOMICS ...................................................................................................................12 1.3.1 Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry.........................................................12 1.3.2 Three-dimensional structure determination.....................................................................................13 1.3.3 Gene Expression Profiling...............................................................................................................13 1.3.4 Protein chips....................................................................................................................................13 1.3.5 ChIp-on-Chip...................................................................................................................................14 1.3.6 Fluorescent tagging.........................................................................................................................14 1.3.7 Methods for the detection of protein-protein interactions ...............................................................14 1.4 REPOSITORIES OF BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION ..........................................................................................18 1.4.1 Bio-sequences repositories ..............................................................................................................18 1.4.2 Gene expression studies repositories...............................................................................................18 1.4.3 Protein domains, families and functional sites ................................................................................18 1.4.4 Protein function repositories ...........................................................................................................20 1.4.5 Protein-protein interactions repositories.........................................................................................21 1.5 PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORKS...........................................................................................................23 1.5.1 Protein interaction networks properties ..........................................................................................25 1.5.2 Protein interaction networks applications.......................................................................................26 1.6 BIOLOGICAL DATA INTEGRATION .............................................................................................................27 1.6.1 Genes and proteins nomenclature ...................................................................................................29 1.6.2 Protein-protein interactions integration..........................................................................................30 1.7 SOFTWARE ...............................................................................................................................................32 1.7.1 Software for translating gene and protein identifiers......................................................................32 1.7.2 Software for protein interaction data integration, analysis and visualization.................................32 1.8 THE ROLE OF BIOINFORMATICS IN CANCER RESEARCH .............................................................................34 1.9 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION......................................................................................................................36 OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................................................39 LIST OF PUBLICATIONS.............................................................................................................................41 CHAPTER II - PIANA (PROTEIN INTERACTIONS AND NETWORK ANALYSIS) ..........................42 CHAPTER III - PROTEIN HUBS CHARACTERIZATION BY INFERRING INTERACTING MOTIFS FROM PROTEIN INTERACTIONS ............................................................................................66 CHAPTER IV - AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO PREDICTING CANCER GENES....................92 CHAPTER V - OTHER APPLICATIONS OF PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS.....................124 CHAPTER VI - DISCUSSION .....................................................................................................................146 6.1.1 Providing universal access to PIANA............................................................................................149 6.1.2 Representation and analysis of transient and permanent interactions ..........................................150 6.1.3 Biological Interactions And Network Analysis (BIANA) ...............................................................150 6.1.4 Interaction Confidence Score ........................................................................................................151 6.1.5 Visualization of protein interaction networks................................................................................152 6.1.6 Integrating sequence information into the method for delineating interacting motifs...................152 6.1.7 PIANA and Diseases......................................................................................................................153 6.1.8 Using PIANA to detect remote homologs ......................................................................................153 6.1.9 The path is consensus, not integration...........................................................................................154 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................156 EPILOGUE.....................................................................................................................................................160 THESIS REFERENCES................................................................................................................................162 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I know this is the section of the thesis that most people read; in fact, it might be the only section of the thesis most people ever think about reading. Maybe in your case this acknowledgements thing is even more pronounced than it usually is, and it has become the central part of your life and it is all you care about. Or perhaps, you didn’t even know there was an acknowledgements section in a PhD thesis, and you just told yourself: “let’s read it!”. Whatever it is that made you read this, you are going to regret it, because these are going to be the most disappointing acknowledgements in human history. At least, for those who do not know the answers… http://www.aragues.com/thesis_ack.php iii iv THESIS ABSTRACT The importance of understanding cellular processes has prompted the development of experimental approaches that detect protein-protein interactions. Recently, most approaches have been focused on large-scale screenings of protein-protein interactions, such as two- hybrid assays and affinity purifications followed by mass spectrometry.
Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Materials
    DEPs in osteosarcoma cells comparing to osteoblastic cells Biological Process Protein Percentage of Hits metabolic process (GO:0008152) 29.3 29.3% cellular process (GO:0009987) 20.2 20.2% localization (GO:0051179) 9.4 9.4% biological regulation (GO:0065007) 8 8.0% developmental process (GO:0032502) 7.8 7.8% response to stimulus (GO:0050896) 5.6 5.6% cellular component organization (GO:0071840) 5.6 5.6% multicellular organismal process (GO:0032501) 4.4 4.4% immune system process (GO:0002376) 4.2 4.2% biological adhesion (GO:0022610) 2.7 2.7% apoptotic process (GO:0006915) 1.6 1.6% reproduction (GO:0000003) 0.8 0.8% locomotion (GO:0040011) 0.4 0.4% cell killing (GO:0001906) 0.1 0.1% 100.1% Genes 2179Hits 3870 biological adhesion apoptotic process … reproduction (GO:0000003) , 0.8% (GO:0022610) , 2.7% locomotion (GO:0040011) ,… immune system process cell killing (GO:0001906) , 0.1% (GO:0002376) , 4.2% multicellular organismal process (GO:0032501) , metabolic process 4.4% (GO:0008152) , 29.3% cellular component organization (GO:0071840) , 5.6% response to stimulus (GO:0050896), 5.6% developmental process (GO:0032502) , 7.8% biological regulation (GO:0065007) , 8.0% cellular process (GO:0009987) , 20.2% localization (GO:0051179) , 9.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2015/065964 Al 7 May 2015 (07.05.2015) W P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2015/065964 Al 7 May 2015 (07.05.2015) W P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agents: KOWALSKI, Thomas, J. et al; Vedder Price C12N 15/90 (2006.01) C12N 15/113 (2010.01) P.C., 1633 Broadway, New York, NY 1001 9 (US). C12N 15/10 (2006.01) C12N 15/63 (2006.01) (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (21) International Application Number: kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, PCT/US2014/062558 AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (22) International Filing Date: DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, 28 October 2014 (28.10.2014) HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (25) Filing Language: English KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (26) Publication Language: English PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (30) Priority Data: SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 61/96 1,980 28 October 20 13 (28. 10.20 13) US TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. 61/963,643 9 December 2013 (09.
    [Show full text]
  • SLFN11 Promotes CDT1 Degradation by CUL4 in Response to Replicative DNA Damage, While Its Absence Leads to Synthetic Lethality with ATR/CHK1 Inhibitors
    SLFN11 promotes CDT1 degradation by CUL4 in response to replicative DNA damage, while its absence leads to synthetic lethality with ATR/CHK1 inhibitors Ukhyun Joa,1, Yasuhisa Muraia, Sirisha Chakkab, Lu Chenb, Ken Chengb, Junko Muraic, Liton Kumar Sahaa, Lisa M. Miller Jenkinsd, and Yves Pommiera,1 aDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20814; bNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Functional Genomics Laboratory, NIH, Rockville, MD 20850; cInstitute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University, 997-0052 Yamagata, Japan; and dLaboratory of Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 Edited by Richard D. Kolodner, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA, and approved December 8, 2020 (received for review July 29, 2020) Schlafen-11 (SLFN11) inactivation in ∼50% of cancer cells confers condensation related to deposition of H3K27me3 in the gene broad chemoresistance. To identify therapeutic targets and under- body of SLFN11 by EZH2, a histone methyltransferase (11). lying molecular mechanisms for overcoming chemoresistance, we Targeting epigenetic regulators is therefore an attractive com- performed an unbiased genome-wide RNAi screen in SLFN11-WT bination strategy to overcome chemoresistance of SLFN11- and -knockout (KO) cells. We found that inactivation of Ataxia deficient cancers (10, 25, 26). An alternative approach is to at- Telangiectasia- and Rad3-related (ATR), CHK1, BRCA2, and RPA1 tack SLFN11-negative cancer cells by targeting the essential SLFN11 overcome chemoresistance to camptothecin (CPT) in -KO pathways that cells use to overcome replicative damage and cells. Accordingly, we validate that clinical inhibitors of ATR replication stress.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials
    Supplementary Materials COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSCRIPTOME, PROTEOME AND miRNA PROFILE OF KUPFFER CELLS AND MONOCYTES Andrey Elchaninov1,3*, Anastasiya Lokhonina1,3, Maria Nikitina2, Polina Vishnyakova1,3, Andrey Makarov1, Irina Arutyunyan1, Anastasiya Poltavets1, Evgeniya Kananykhina2, Sergey Kovalchuk4, Evgeny Karpulevich5,6, Galina Bolshakova2, Gennady Sukhikh1, Timur Fatkhudinov2,3 1 Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia 2 Laboratory of Growth and Development, Scientific Research Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia 3 Histology Department, Medical Institute, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia 4 Laboratory of Bioinformatic methods for Combinatorial Chemistry and Biology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 5 Information Systems Department, Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 6 Genome Engineering Laboratory, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia Figure S1. Flow cytometry analysis of unsorted blood sample. Representative forward, side scattering and histogram are shown. The proportions of negative cells were determined in relation to the isotype controls. The percentages of positive cells are indicated. The blue curve corresponds to the isotype control. Figure S2. Flow cytometry analysis of unsorted liver stromal cells. Representative forward, side scattering and histogram are shown. The proportions of negative cells were determined in relation to the isotype controls. The percentages of positive cells are indicated. The blue curve corresponds to the isotype control. Figure S3. MiRNAs expression analysis in monocytes and Kupffer cells. Full-length of heatmaps are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Pharmacology of Cancer Therapy in Human Colorectal Cancer by Gene Expression Profiling1,2
    [CANCER RESEARCH 63, 6855–6863, October 15, 2003] Molecular Pharmacology of Cancer Therapy in Human Colorectal Cancer by Gene Expression Profiling1,2 Paul A. Clarke,3 Mark L. George, Sandra Easdale, David Cunningham, R. Ian Swift, Mark E. Hill, Diana M. Tait, and Paul Workman Cancer Research UK Centre for Cancer Therapeutics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG [P. A. C., M. L. G., S. E., P. W.]; Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey [D. C., M. E. H., D. M. T.]; and Department of Surgery, Mayday Hospital, Croydon, Surrey [M. L. G., R. I. S.], United Kingdom ABSTRACT ment with a single dose of MMC4 and during a continuous infusion of 5FU. In this study, we report for the first time gene expression Global gene expression profiling has potential for elucidating the com- profiling in cancer patients before, and critically, during the period of plex cellular effects and mechanisms of action of novel targeted anticancer exposure to chemotherapy. We have demonstrated that the approach agents or existing chemotherapeutics for which the precise molecular is feasible, and we have detected a novel molecular response that mechanism of action may be unclear. In this study, decreased expression would not have been predicted from in vitro studies and that would of genes required for RNA and protein synthesis, and for metabolism were have otherwise been missed by conventional approaches. The results detected in rectal cancer biopsies taken from patients during a 5-fluorou- also suggest a possible new therapeutic approach. Overall our obser- racil infusion. Our observations demonstrate that this approach is feasible and can detect responses that may have otherwise been missed by con- vations suggest that gene expression profiling in response to treatment ventional methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Study of RNA Polymerase II and III Snapc-Bound Promoters Reveals a Gene Transcribed by Both Enzymes and a Broad Use of Common Activators
    Genomic Study of RNA Polymerase II and III SNAPc-Bound Promoters Reveals a Gene Transcribed by Both Enzymes and a Broad Use of Common Activators Nicole James Faresse1., Donatella Canella1., Viviane Praz1,2, Joe¨lle Michaud1¤, David Romascano1, Nouria Hernandez1* 1 Center for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2 Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland Abstract SNAPc is one of a few basal transcription factors used by both RNA polymerase (pol) II and pol III. To define the set of active SNAPc-dependent promoters in human cells, we have localized genome-wide four SNAPc subunits, GTF2B (TFIIB), BRF2, pol II, and pol III. Among some seventy loci occupied by SNAPc and other factors, including pol II snRNA genes, pol III genes with type 3 promoters, and a few un-annotated loci, most are primarily occupied by either pol II and GTF2B, or pol III and BRF2. A notable exception is the RPPH1 gene, which is occupied by significant amounts of both polymerases. We show that the large majority of SNAPc-dependent promoters recruit POU2F1 and/or ZNF143 on their enhancer region, and a subset also recruits GABP, a factor newly implicated in SNAPc-dependent transcription. These activators associate with pol II and III promoters in G1 slightly before the polymerase, and ZNF143 is required for efficient transcription initiation complex assembly. The results characterize a set of genes with unique properties and establish that polymerase specificity is not absolute in vivo. Citation: James Faresse N, Canella D, Praz V, Michaud J, Romascano D, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Radiation Hybrid Map of Chicken Chromosome 4
    A radiation hybrid map of chicken Chromosome 4 Tarik S.K.M. Rabie,1* Richard P.M.A. Crooijmans,1 Mireille Morisson,2 Joanna Andryszkiewicz,1 Jan J. van der Poel,1 Alain Vignal,2 Martien A.M. Groenen1 1Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen University, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands 2Laboratoire de ge´ne´tique cellulaire, Institut national de la recherche agronomique, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France Received: 15 December 2003 / Accepted: 16 March 2004 Comparative genomics plays an important role in Abstract the understanding of genome dynamics during ev- The mapping resolution of the physical map for olution and as a tool for the transfer of mapping chicken Chromosome 4 (GGA4) was improved by a information from species with gene-dense maps to combination of radiation hybrid (RH) mapping and species whose maps are less well developed (O‘Bri- bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) mapping. The en et al. 1993, 1999). For farm animals, therefore, ChickRH6 hybrid panel was used to construct an RH the human and mouse have been the logical choice map of GGA4. Eleven microsatellites known to be as the model species used for this comparison. located on GGA4 were included as anchors to the Medium-resolution comparative maps have been genetic linkage map for this chromosome. Based on published for many of the livestock species, in- the known conserved synteny between GGA4 and cluding pig, cattle, sheep, and horse, identifying human Chromosomes 4 and X, sequences were large regions of conserved synteny between these identified for the orthologous chicken genes from species and man and mouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature Regulates Splicing Efficiency of the Cold-Inducible RNA-Binding Protein Gene Cirbp
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Temperature regulates splicing efficiency of the cold-inducible RNA-binding protein gene Cirbp Ivana Gotic,1 Saeed Omidi,2 Fabienne Fleury-Olela,1 Nacho Molina,2,3 Felix Naef,2 and Ueli Schibler1 1Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland; 2The Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland In mammals, body temperature fluctuates diurnally around a mean value of 36°C–37°C. Despite the small differences between minimal and maximal values, body temperature rhythms can drive robust cycles in gene expression in cultured cells and, likely, animals. Here we studied the mechanisms responsible for the temperature- dependent expression of cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRBP). In NIH3T3 fibroblasts exposed to simulated mouse body temperature cycles, Cirbp mRNA oscillates about threefold in abundance, as it does in mouse livers. This daily mRNA accumulation cycle is directly controlled by temperature oscillations and does not depend on the cells’ circadian clocks. Here we show that the temperature-dependent accumulation of Cirbp mRNA is controlled primarily by the regulation of splicing efficiency, defined as the fraction of Cirbp pre-mRNA processed into mature mRNA. As revealed by genome-wide “approach to steady-state” kinetics, this post-transcriptional mechanism is widespread in the temperature-dependent control of gene expression. [Keywords: Cirbp; splicing efficiency; temperature; circadian rhythms] Supplemental material is available for this article. Received July 12, 2016; revised version accepted August 19, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of UMI ( 8 Bases )
    TAN TANTA CU O USLA 20180030515A1DA MATA MATA MALTA MARTINI ( 19) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication (10 ) Pub. No. : US 2018/ 0030515 A1 Regev et al. (43 ) Pub . Date : Feb . 1 . 2018 ( 54 ) DROPLET -BASED METHOD AND Related U . S . Application Data APPARATUS FOR COMPOSITE (63 ) Continuation - in -part of application No . PCT/ SINGLE - CELL NUCLEIC ACID ANALYSIS US2015 / 049178 , filed on Sep . 9 , 2015 . ( 71) Applicants : The Broad Institute Inc ., Cambridge, (60 ) Provisional application No . 62 /048 ,227 , filed on Sep . MA (US ) ; Massachusetts Institute of 9 , 2014 , provisional application No. 62 / 146 ,642 , filed Technology , Cambridge , MA (US ) ; on Apr. 13 , 2015 . President and Fellows of Harvard College, Cambridge, MA (US ) Publication Classification (51 ) Int . CI. (72 ) Inventors : Aviv Regev , Cambridge, MA (US ) ; C120 1 /68 (2006 .01 ) Evan Zane MACOSKO , Cambridge , GO6K 19 / 06 ( 2006 . 01 ) MA (US ) ; Steven Andrew ( 2006 .01 ) MCCARROLL , Cambridge , MA (US ) ; C12N 15 / 10 Alexander K . SHALEK , Cambridge, (52 ) U . S . CI. MA (US ) ; Anindita BASU , Cambridge , CPC .. .. C12Q 1/ 6809 ( 2013. 01 ) ; C12N 15 / 1096 MA (US ) ; Christopher B . FORD , (2013 . 01 ) ; C12Q 1 /6869 ( 2013 .01 ) ; C12Q Cambridge, MA (US ) ; Hongkun 1 /6834 ( 2013. 01 ) ; G06K 19 / 06 ( 2013. 01 ) PARK , Lexington , MA (US ) ; David A . (57 ) ABSTRACT WEITZ , Bolton , MA (US ) The present invention generally relates to a combination of molecular barcoding and emulsion - based microfluidics to (21 ) Appl. No. : 15 / 453 ,405 isolate , lyse , barcode , and prepare nucleic acids from indi (22 ) Filed : Mar. 8 , 2017 vidual cells in a high - throughput manner . Synthesis of UMI ( 8 bases) 8 rounds of synthesis • Millions of the same cell barcode per bead • 48 differentmolecular barcodes (UMIS ) per bead Patent Application Publication Feb .
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Cross-Association Between Mrna Expression and Rnai Efficacy for Predictive Target Discovery in Colon Cancers
    cancers Article Analysis of Cross-Association between mRNA Expression and RNAi Efficacy for Predictive Target Discovery in Colon Cancers 1, 2, 2 2 1,2, Euna Jeong y, Yejin Lee y, Youngju Kim , Jieun Lee and Sukjoon Yoon * 1 Research Institute of Women’s Health, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Biological Sciences, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea; [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (Y.K.); [email protected] (J.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-710-9415 These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 7 October 2020; Accepted: 23 October 2020; Published: 23 October 2020 Simple Summary: This study focused on finding genes for which mRNA expression was able to predict the anticancer efficacy of its RNAi treatment. Predictive target discovery is of critical importance in developing biomarker-based strategies of precision medicine. We demonstrated this carrying out cross-association analysis on collateral mRNA expression and RNAi treatment data of ~12,000 genes on a colon cell line panel. The analysis revealed several genes with significant association between mRNA expression level and the inhibitory efficacy of its RNAi treatment. The experimental validation confirm that this simple approach has general applications for studying gene association between omics data from diverse cancer lineages. Abstract: The availability of large-scale, collateral mRNA expression and RNAi data from diverse cancer cell types provides useful resources for the discovery of anticancer targets for which inhibitory efficacy can be predicted from gene expression. Here, we calculated bidirectional cross-association scores (predictivity and descriptivity) for each of approximately 18,000 genes identified from mRNA and RNAi (i.e., shRNA and sgRNA) data from colon cancer cell lines.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Identify Physiologically Relevant Protein Interactions Using Covalent-Capture Halotag® Technology Rob Chumanov, Phd, MBA
    How to Identify Physiologically Relevant Protein Interactions Using Covalent-capture HaloTag® Technology Rob Chumanov, PhD, MBA ©2013 Promega Corporation. Confidential and Proprietary. Not for Further Disclosure. Outline 1. What is HaloTag® technology? 2. Why use HaloTag for pull-down assays? 3. Capturing small and large protein complexes 4. Studying physiologically relevant protein:protein interactions 5. FindMyGene™ Promega-Madison ©2013 Promega Corporation. Confidential and Proprietary. Not for Further Disclosure. HaloTag® Platform One Fusion Protein Tag for Multiple Apps Proteomic Analysis Cell-Based Analysis In-vivo models • Protein:Protein interactions • Localization • Fluorescent Imaging • Protein:DNA interactions • Real-time imaging • Protein Purification • Protein trafficking Fluorescent proteins (e.g. GFP, RFP) Affinity tags (e.g. GST, Flag, His) Antibodies HaloTag® ©2013 Promega Corporation. Confidential and Proprietary. Not for Further Disclosure. HaloTag™ Technology Covalent Binding Mechanism • HaloTag is a protein fusion tag engineered to covalently bind a synthetic chloroalkane ligand. Chloroalkane Functional group Protein of HT Interest + Surface attachment & Cl- Fluorescent ligands Protein of Interest HT Covalent bond = Irreversible attachment!!! ©2013 Promega Corporation. Confidential and Proprietary. Not for Further Disclosure. HaloTag™ Ligand Diversity Multiple Ligands to Meet Your Application Needs HaloTag ligand HaloTag fluorescent ligands . Multiple fluorophores HaloTag . Cell-permeable ligands . Cell-impermeable
    [Show full text]
  • Dazl Regulates Germ Cell Survival Through a Network of Polya-Proximal Mrna Interactions
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/273292; this version posted February 28, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Dazl regulates germ cell survival through a network of polyA-proximal mRNA interactions Leah L. Zagore1, Thomas J. Sweet1, Molly M. Hannigan1, Sebastien M. Weyn-Vanhentenryck2, Chaolin Zhang2, and Donny D. Licatalosi1* 1 Center for RNA Science and Therapeutics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, USA 2 Center for Motor Neuron Biology and Disease, Columbia University, New York, New York, 10032, USA Keywords: germ cell survival; post-transcriptional regulation; 3’UTR, RNA networks; spermatogenesis; RNA binding protein; Dazl Running title: mRNA regulation and germ cell survival *To whom correspondence should be addressed Donny D. Licatalosi Center for RNA Science and Therapeutics Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA Tel: (216) 368-4757 Fax: (216) 368-2010 Email: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/273292; this version posted February 28, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract The RNA binding protein Dazl is essential for gametogenesis, but its direct in vivo functions, RNA targets, and the molecular basis for germ cell loss in DAZL KO mice are unknown.
    [Show full text]