The Origins of Writing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Origins of Writing Sandstone sphinx found in Serabit el-Khadim in Sinai, with Proto- Sinaitic signs on the left base, some of which resemble Egyptian hieroglyphs (inscribed on the sphinx’s right shoulder and base – not shown), 1800–1500 BC. The Proto-Sinaitic signs are thought to be part of the world’s first alphabet, inspired by Egyptian hieroglyphs. When and how did people first begin to write down ideas? Andrew Robinson investigates The origins of writing Writing is generally agreed to be among from its frequent appearance in pictorial quality, whereas the second the greatest inventions in human history, exquisite hieroglyphic inscriptions on frequently retained it. Furthermore, in perhaps the greatest invention, since objects in the tomb. both of these neighbouring cultures, it made history possible – as well as So where, when and how did writing the representation of ideas, words and today’s digital world. When H. G. Wells come into existence? Wells hazarded the syllables that could not be directly published A Short History of the World in following explanation, again perceptive, pictured was made possible through the 1922 he concisely expressed writing’s if inevitably far more speculative: ‘At use of rebuses (Latin for ‘by things’). significance to civilisation as follows: first writing was merely an abbreviated For example, according to Wells the two ‘The command of the priest or king and method of pictorial record. Even before syllables (so to speak) of the familiar his seal could go far beyond his sight Neolithic times men were beginning to Scottish name ‘Campbell’ might be and voice and could survive his death’, write.’ Thus, in certain Palaeolithic cave represented in rebus writing by a picture citing the artistically carved sealstones paintings of Europe, the artists created of a camp with tents beside a picture of of early Mesopotamia impressed in full human figures but also abbreviated a bell. These two developments then led clay. As if to confirm the truth of this human figures with just a vertical mark to the alphabet: ‘All the true alphabets observation, in November 1922, just and one or two transverse strokes. of the later world derived from a after Wells’s book was published, the ‘From this to a conventional condensed mixture of the Sumerian cuneiform tomb of an unknown pharaoh who picture writing was an easy transition’, and the Egyptian hieroglyphic (priest ruled more than three millennia ago Wells claimed, which occurred in both writing). Later in China there was to was discovered in Egypt’s Valley of ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt, in develop a conventionalised picture the Kings. The pharaoh’s name was the cuneiform and hieroglyphic scripts, writing, but in China it never got to the immediately identified as Tutankhamun the first of which soon abandoned its alphabetical stage.’ 42 British Museum Magazine Autumn 2020 The earliest Neolithic Chinese Chinese pottery marks from characters the Banpo culture inscribed on a of the Yellow River Shang Dynasty valley, 5000–4000 oracle bone, BC. c.1200 BC. Late Uruk proto-cuneiform clay tablet from Mesopotamia, 3300–3100 BC, with a human head and a triangular object representing bread in front of it, and three different types of numerical symbols. A century after Wells’s suggestive and all thought’ – to quote an influential China’s Neolithic pottery marks outline, how much of it is still accepted? definition by Sinologist John DeFrancis dating from 5000–4000 BC – notably And how much further advanced is our in his book Visible Speech: The Diverse those from the Banpo culture of the understanding of the origin of writing? Oneness of Writing Systems. Yellow River valley found in 1953 The answer is, broadly speaking, most However, Wells’s notion of the – have stimulated speculation about of it. Writing began with pictures, then monogenesis of writing in Mesopotamia their connection with today’s Chinese came pictography, then rebuses, then (the ‘cradle of civilisation’) closely characters. The characters’ earliest from c.3300 BC Sumerian cuneiform followed by Egypt, which was favoured clearly recognisable versions occur and soon afterwards Egyptian by most scholars until the later 20th on the so-called ‘oracle bones’ of the hieroglyphs. Finally, in the mid-second century, has been progressively Shang culture dating from c.1200 BC, millennium in Palestine, came the first abandoned. ‘Origin’ has tended accidentally discovered by Chinese ‘Proto-Canaanite’ alphabet, influenced towards ‘origins’. Generally speaking, scholars in Beijing in 1899. They record by the hieroglyphic signs. These stages the archaeological discoveries of the royal divinations in sophisticated detail. are still widely seen by modern scholars past century – and the decipherments Certain Neolithic marks resemble as being essential to the development of of ancient scripts such as Linear B of Shang characters, but the marks writing, as it evolved from proto-writing, Crete/Greece and the Mayan glyphs of generally occur in isolation, not in capable of limited communication like Mesoamerica – have complicated, rather sequence like the characters, and the the earliest ‘proto-cuneiform’ tablets than simplified, our understanding of apparent resemblances may be simply and also modern airport symbols, to early writing. Let us look at just three coincidental, rather than definitive. full writing, that is, ‘a system of graphic scripts: in China, South Asia and Rapa Moreover, the gap in time between symbols that can be used to convey any Nui (Easter Island). the Neolithic marks and the Shang British Museum Magazine Autumn 2020 43 culture – more than three millennia – seems implausibly long for the developmental stages of a sophisticated writing system: it is the same time span in which cuneiform and hieroglyphs both originated and operated as mature writing systems. ‘At present, the most that can be said for Neolithic origins is that certain habits of drawing, patterning and combining elements in Neolithic pottery marks might have endured for many centuries before they provided some sort of basis for the first invention of writing signs’, wrote former British Museum curator Oliver Moore in his BM guide, Reading the Past: Chinese. Current scholars therefore hold differing opinions about the origin of Shang writing and Chinese characters. Some favour a gradual development of full writing from 5000 BC – so far undetected by archaeologists – from the proto-writing of the Neolithic marks, viewing Chinese writing as wholly indigenous. But most continue to support a much later emergence of writing in the Shang culture c.1200 BC, without being able to account for how this occurred. Might such apparently rapid emergence be explained by the import of the basic idea of writing from Mesopotamia via some forerunner of the Silk Roads that operated between Europe and China from the end of the 1st millennium BC until modern times? Conceivably so – yet there is no clear evidence for such a long-distance link. Classic Mayan In South Asia, an entirely unsuspected carved limestone civilisation in the Indus River valley lintel from Mexico (modern Pakistan and northwest India) showing a bloodletting ritual dating from about 2500–1900 BC, performed by the was discovered by British and Indian king of Yaxchilan archaeologists in the early 1920s. It used and his wife in 709 AD, with an exquisite script inscribed mainly glyphs indicating on steatite sealstones, some of which the event and the are displayed in the British Museum. date, produced in 723–6. Unfortunately, the Indus signs have resisted an agreed decipherment for almost a century, notwithstanding dozens of highly imaginative proposals. They – along with enigmatic emblems of objects, yogic figures and animals, Indus sealstone from Harappa including ‘unicorns’, inscribed next with a ‘unicorn’ to many of the signs – resemble those and undeciphered of no other contemporary ancient inscription, 2500–1900 BC. script. Probably Indus sealstones and signs were markers of personal 44 British Museum Magazine Autumn 2020 identification like the clay cylinder seals origin of the script. Intriguingly, some of the Rongorongo of Mesopotamia. A stone boss on the Our third mystery relates to Rapa Nui glyphs closely resemble 40–50 far-distant back of sealstones with a hole drilled in the Pacific Ocean, one of the most ancient Indus signs, leading to far-fetched in it suggests that they were carried on remote inhabited islands on the planet, claims of Indus influence across oceans strings around the neck of the owner. famous for its giant human figures in and millennia. Did the islanders invent Intriguingly, a small number of Indus stone, the moai. In the 19th century, Rongorongo unprompted, or did they seals (20 in all) have been discovered at and possibly long before, Rapa Nui also borrow it from another place, perhaps excavations in Mesopotamia. There is had a script, although the script does Polynesia or Mesoamerica (home of also an Akkadian cuneiform cylinder not appear on the moai. Engraved only the less ancient Mayan glyphs), via seal dating from c.2300 BC (the time of on wooden tablets – maybe with the trans-Pacific contacts? Or did it emerge Sargon) that may show a Mesopotamian tooth of a shark, a flake of obsidian following the first visit of European ruler in negotiation with Indus or a sharpened bird bone – some 25 sailors on Spanish ships to Rapa Nui in merchants, according to its inscription, examples of this undeciphered script are 1770, after the islanders saw the sailors’ which refers to Meluhha: the apparent scattered around the world’s museums, alphabetic writing? If the independent Akkadian name for the Indus region. including the British Museum. None invention of Rongorongo on isolated Without doubt, the Indus civilisation of the tablets is formally dated. The Rapa Nui were ever to be proved, traded extensively with Mesopotamia script is known as Rongorongo – the this would enormously strengthen by sea during the third millennium name means ‘chants or recitations’ in the argument that writing had several BC.
Recommended publications
  • Universal Iconography in Writing Systems Evidence and Explanation in the Easter Island
    Universal Iconography in Writing Systems Evidence and Explanation in the Easter Island and Indus Valley Scripts Richard E. McDorman © 2009 Summary Iconography has played a central role in the development of writing systems. That all independently derived ancient scripts began as arrangements of pictograms before evolving into their elaborated forms evinces the fundamental importance of iconography in the evolution of writing. Symbols of the earliest logographic writing systems are characterized by a number of iconographic principles. Elucidation of these iconographic principles provides a theoretical framework for the analysis of structural similarities in unrelated, independently evolved writing systems. Two such writing systems are the ancient Indus Valley and Easter Island scripts. Although separated by vast tracts of time and space, the two writing systems share between forty and fifty complex characters, a problem first identified by Hevesy in 1932. Previous attempts to explain the similarities between the Indus Valley script and the rongorongo of Easter Island, which have relied on notions of cultural contact or historical derivation, have proved unfruitful. In reconsidering the problem, a novel approach based on comparative iconographic principles can explain the resemblances between the two scripts as the product of the universal iconography displayed by all writing systems in their pictographic and logographic stages of development. The principle of iconography in writing systems It has been noted that graphically similar symbols have been employed to represent semantically cognate ideas in a number of early, unrelated writing systems. 1 One explanation for this phenomenon is that there exist universal iconographic principles that bear upon the minds of those creating these scripts, thereby influencing the graphical form of the glyphs 2 that comprise the newly created writing systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Encoding Diversity for All the World's Languages
    Encoding Diversity for All the World’s Languages The Script Encoding Initiative (Universal Scripts Project) Michael Everson, Evertype Westport, Co. Mayo, Ireland Bamako, Mali • 6 May 2005 1. Current State of the Unicode Standard • Unicode 4.1 defines over 97,000 characters 1. Current State of the Unicode Standard: New Script Additions Unicode 4.1 (31 March 2005): For Unicode 5.0 (2006): Buginese N’Ko Coptic Balinese Glagolitic Phags-pa New Tai Lue Phoenician Nuskhuri (extends Georgian) Syloti Nagri Cuneiform Tifinagh Kharoshthi Old Persian Cuneiform 1. Current State of the Unicode Standard • Unicode 4.1 defines over 97,000 characters • Unicode covers over 50 scripts (many of which are used for languages with over 5 million speakers) 1. Current State of the Unicode Standard • Unicode 4.1 defines over 97,000 characters • Unicode covers over 50 scripts (often used for languages with over 5 million speakers) • Unicode enables millions of users worldwide to view web pages, send e-mails, converse in chat-rooms, and share text documents in their native script 1. Current State of the Unicode Standard • Unicode 4.1 defines over 97,000 characters • Unicode covers over 50 scripts (often used for languages with over 5 million speakers) • Unicode enables millions of users worldwide to view web pages, send e-mails, converse in chat- rooms, and share text documents in their native script • Unicode is widely supported by current fonts and operating systems, but… Over 80 scripts are missing! Missing Modern Minority Scripts India, Nepal, Southeast Asia China:
    [Show full text]
  • Translation Rights / Fall 2020
    Translation Rights / Fall 2020 Simonetta Agnello Hornby / Sibilla Aleramo / Eleonora Marangoni / Agnese Codignola / Paolo Settis / Franco Baresi / Guido Tonelli / Paolo Sorrentino / Silvia Ferrara / Giovanni Testori / Giuseppina Torregrossa / Boris Pasternak / Tomasi Di Lampedusa / Luce D’Eramo / Alessandro Vanoli / Gad Lerner / Barbara Fiorio / Stefano Benni / Francesco Stoppa / Arianna Cecconi / Marco D’Eramo / Massimo Recalcati / Federica Brunini SIMONETTA AGNELLO HORNBY Fiction © Dario Canova SIMONETTA AGNELLO HORNBY Piano nobile / Piano nobile was born in Palermo but has been living Palermo, summer 1942. On his deathbed, the Baron Enrico Sorci in London since 1972 where she worked sees the recent history of his family pass before his eyes, as in a lucid as a solicitor for the community legal delirium. He sees the devotion of his wife, his daughters (Maria aid firm specialized in domestic violence Teresa, Anna and Lia) and his sons (Cola, Ludovico, Filippo and that she co-founded in 1979. She has Andrea), at the same time he sees the destiny of a city that, at the been lecturing for many years, and was a turn of the century, is full of opportunities and new wealth and of part-time judge at the Special Educational trains passing by loaded with goods. Needs and Disability Tribunal for eight Before dying, the baron orders to wait before announcing his passing. years. Her novels: La zia marchesa (2004), His relatives therefore gather around the large table in the dining Boccamurata (2007), Vento scomposto room for a crowed symposium held amidst silence, twinkles, tensions, (2009), La Monaca (2010), La cucina del squabbles, ancient rivalries and new ambitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Rongorongo and the Syllable Sequence of Ancient Chants from the Easter Island
    Comparison between Rongorongo and the syllable sequence of ancient chants from the Easter Island Fumihiko Yamaguchi Keio University Department of Information and Computer Science Hiyoshi, Kanagawa, 3-14-1, JAPAN [email protected] Abstract. Rongorongo is sequence of symbols engraved on the surface of wooden artifacts made in the Easter Island. Rongorongo is considered to be script, but has not yet been deciphered. As Rongorongo is assumed to be the record of chant, we syntactically compare Rongorongo with chants in the Easter Island. A simple exhaustive search method is ap- plied to find correspondence between the order of symbols in Rongorongo and that of syllables in the chants. However, the correct correspondence is unknown. Therefore, the proposed method is adapted to a similar problem of matching kanji-hiragana mixed text with katakana text in order to characterize the method. After confirming that the method pro- duces higher precision when there are more kind of frequent symbols. As a result, some correspondences are found, whereas no correspondence is found in most pairs of Rongorongo lines and verses of the chants. 1 Introduction In the Easter Island, sequence of symbols engraved in wooden artifacts are remained which is called Rongorongo. Rongorongo is considered that may be scripts, however it has not yet been deciphered. The first European visitors to the Easter Island is Roggeveen, who is a Dutch explorer, arrived on Easter Day 1722. But they made no mention of written characters. The second European is Don Felipe arrived in 1770. There is a record that Easter Island people signed on the Spanish document with local symbols.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Systems • 1 1 Writing Systems Andrew Robinson
    9780198606536_essay01.indd 2 8/17/2009 2:19:03 PM writing systems • 1 1 Writing Systems Andrew Robinson 1 The emergence of writing 2 Development and diffusion of writing systems 3 Decipherment 4 Classification of writing systems 5 The origin of the alphabet 6 The family of alphabets 7 Chinese and Japanese writing 8 Electronic writing 1 The emergence of writing istrators and merchants. Still others think it was not an invention at all, but an accidental discovery. Many Without writing, there would be no recording, no regard it as the result of evolution over a long period, history, and of course no books. The creation of writ- rather than a flash of inspiration. One particularly ing permitted the command of a ruler and his seal to well-aired theory holds that writing grew out of a extend far beyond his sight and voice, and even to long-standing counting system of clay ‘tokens’. Such survive his death. If the Rosetta Stone did not exist, ‘tokens’—varying from simple, plain discs to more for example, the world would be virtually unaware of complex, incised shapes whose exact purpose is the nondescript Egyptian king Ptolemy V Epiphanes, unknown—have been found in many Middle Eastern whose priests promulgated his decree upon the stone archaeological sites, and have been dated from 8000 in three *scripts: hieroglyphic, demotic, and (Greek) to 1500 bc. The substitution of two-dimensional sym- alphabetic. bols in clay for these three-dimensional tokens was a How did writing begin? The favoured explanation, first step towards writing, according to this theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Evidence for Cosmogonic Texts in the Rongorongo Inscriptions of Easter Island Steven R
    Rapa Nui Journal: Journal of the Easter Island Foundation Volume 9 Article 1 Issue 4 Rapa Nui Journal 9#4, December 1995 1995 Further Evidence for Cosmogonic Texts in the Rongorongo Inscriptions of Easter Island Steven R. Fischer Follow this and additional works at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/rnj Part of the History of the Pacific slI ands Commons, and the Pacific slI ands Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Fischer, Steven R. (1995) "Further Evidence for Cosmogonic Texts in the Rongorongo Inscriptions of Easter Island," Rapa Nui Journal: Journal of the Easter Island Foundation: Vol. 9 : Iss. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/rnj/vol9/iss4/1 This Research Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Hawai`i Press at Kahualike. It has been accepted for inclusion in Rapa Nui Journal: Journal of the Easter Island Foundation by an authorized editor of Kahualike. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fischer: Further Evidence for Cosmogonic Texts in the Rongorongo Inscriptions of Easter Island Further Evidence for Cosmogonic Texts in the Rongorongo Inscriptions ofEaster Island Steven Roger Fi cher Auckland, New Zealand . l In the latest Issue of the Journal ofthe Polynesian Society 3629" and that earlier had enabled the identification of the I announce what is perhaps the first scientifically verifiable procreation triads in these three inscriptions. identification of the genre of three rongorongo inscriptions. The recent discovery of cosmogonies in the rongorongo The article detailing this announcement demonstrates that the inventory of Easter Island and its subsequent elaboration to rongorongo texts on the "Santiago Staff' (RR IO), the reverse include most of rongorongo's surviving inscriptions of the 'Small Santiago Tablet" (RR 8v), and "Honolulu 3629" constitute two significant breakthroughs in the archaeological (RR J I) appear to consist, either exclusively (RR 10 and 11) decipherment of Easter Island's rongorongo script.
    [Show full text]
  • ONIX for Books Codelists Issue 47
    ONIX for Books Codelists Issue 47 31 October 2019 DOI: 10.4400/akjh Go to latest Issue All ONIX standards and documentation – including this document – are copyright materials, made available free of charge for general use. A full license agreement (DOI: 10.4400/nwgj) that governs their use is available on the EDItEUR website. All ONIX users should note that this issue of the ONIX codelists does not include support for codelists used only with ONIX version 2.1. ONIX 2.1 remains fully usable, using Issue 36 of the codelists or earlier, and Issue 36 continues to be available via the archive section of the EDItEUR website (https://www.editeur.org/15/Archived-Previous-Releases). These codelists are also available within a multilingual online browser at https://ns.editeur.org/onix. Codelists are revised quarterly. Layout of codelists This document contains ONIX for Books codelists Issue 46, intended primarily for use with ONIX 3.0. The codelists are arranged in a single table for reference and printing. They may also be used as controlled vocabularies, independent of ONIX. This document does not differentiate explicitly between codelists for ONIX 3.0 and those that are used with earlier releases, but lists used only with earlier releases have been removed. For details of which code list to use with which data element in each version of ONIX, please consult the main Specification for the appropriate release. Occasionally, a handful of codes within a particular list are defined as either deprecated, or not valid for use in a particular version of ONIX or with a particular data element.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Pattern Recognition in Linear a Jajwalya Karajgikar, Amira Al-Khulaidy, Anamaria Berea
    Computational Pattern Recognition in Linear A Jajwalya Karajgikar, Amira Al-Khulaidy, Anamaria Berea To cite this version: Jajwalya Karajgikar, Amira Al-Khulaidy, Anamaria Berea. Computational Pattern Recognition in Linear A. In press. hal-03207615 HAL Id: hal-03207615 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03207615 Preprint submitted on 26 Apr 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Computational Pattern Recognition in Linear A Jajwalya R. Karajgikar1*, Amira Al-Khulaidy 2 , Anamaria Berea3 1 Computational Sciences, MS, George Mason University 2 Computational Social Sciences, PhD student, George Mason University 3 Computational and Data Sciences, Associate Professor, George Mason University *Corresponding author: Jajwalya R. Karajgikar1 Abstract Linear A is an ancient Mycenaean Greek language that is as of yet undeciphered. Computational analysis of the symbols using natural language processing and data mining techniques can aid to better understand this logogram language, and to help us uncover interesting statistical and information-theoretic patterns even without deciphering the language. Using information theory and data science techniques, we show an exploratory analysis of these symbols. We use n-gram analysis to summarize and predict the possible symbols on lost stone tablets, while symbols are clustered by topic modeling as well as k-means, for comparison.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Stones “Foundation Stones” of the Library
    Thompson Library Floor Inlays & Elevator Etchings Foundation Stones “Foundation Stones” of the Library Set in the terrazzo of the William • Abugidas have unit letters Guides to the Floor Inlays Oxley Thompson Memorial Library’s for simple syllables and diacritic ground and first floors are 49 metal marks to indicate different vowels or Ground Floor tablets documenting forms of writ- the absence of a vowel. Devanagari 1 Avestan - language of the Zoroastrian ten communication from around the (3), Tibetan (31), Thai (16), and Bur- holy books, NE Iran, ca. 7th c. BCE world. Forty-five additional etchings mese (#3, First floor elevator door) 2 Glagolitic - the oldest Slavic alphabet, are featured in the decorative framing ca. 9th c. CE show how these systems ramified as of the Stack Tower elevators. These they spread from India. 3 Letters of Devanagari - used for Sanskrit, examples include full writing systems Hindi and other Indic languages that have evolved over the past 4,000 4 Braille - devised in 1821 by Louis Braille to 5,000 years, some of their precur- • Syllabaries can be large, sors, and a few other graphic forms like Chinese (8), or small, like Japa- 5 Letters of the precursor of Ethiopic that collectively give a sense of the nese hiragana (9). The Linear B (32) syllabary (southern Arabia, early 1st millennium CE). immense visual range of inscriptive of pre-Homeric Greek was a sylla- techniques. Writing systems estab- bary. Mayan (44), the best-known of 6 Cherokee - the syllabary devised and publicly demonstrated by Sequuoyah lish the foundation upon which all the Meso-Americans scripts, was a in 1821 library collections are built, and it is syllabary, as are recently invented fitting that these “foundation stones” scripts for indigenous North American 7 Modern Korean - a headline font decorate this building.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Index with Hyperlinks to PDF Files
    Index A allography, 129, 134, 136, 232, 233 alphabet, 89, 144–148, 150, 152, abbreviation, 14, 15, 32, 33, 60–63, 154, 155, 157, 166, 168– 76, 77, 91, 269, 282, 378, 170, 172, 177, 180, 182, 514, 631, 719, 819, 946, 185–187, 218, 223–230, 1078 232, 234–236, 241, 242, marker, 15 244, 429, 432, 463, 473, abjad, 51, 53, 54, 60, 76, 134, 178, 569, 763, 765, 807, 810, 180, 228, 625, 781, 807– 811, 822, 825, 829, 831, 811, 820, 822, 910, 1109 837, 841, 888, 907, 908, Abkhaz, 115 910, 916, 1109, 1112 abstract, 561, 563, 565, 567 a monument to hidebound object, 9 conservatism, 114 abugida, 54, 162, 163, 165, 177, Arabic, 910 180, 184, 228, 625, 807– Aramaic, 166 811, 818–820, 822 Armenian, 166, 185, 186 acrophonic, 208, 232 Bougainvillian, 837 principle, 168, 224, 232 Carian, 181, 182, 232, 233 acrostics, 1109, 1111–1113, 1116 consonantal, 208, 218, 810, Adobe, 441 811 Aegean, 807, 809 Coptic, 184, 775, 776, 778, 780 Aidarus, 980 Cyrillic, 115, 154, 1068, 1070, Ajami, 971 1080 Akkadian, 59, 116, 117, 216, 218, dual, 14 929, 1112 English, 825 al-Busiri, 980 Entlehnungs-, 150 al-Inkishafi, 977 Etruscan, 170, 171, 916 Albanian, 166, 373, 392 Georgian, 793 aleph, 466, 1114, 1115 Gothic, 166, 224 Algerian (typeface), 397 Greek, 115, 167–171, 182, 187, Algernon, 276, 278 225, 226, 230–232, 234, Alice in Wonderland, 350, 351 775–779, 781 alloglottoepy, 790 Hebrew, 231, 497 alloglottography, 790 history, 157 βʹ Index Korean, 807 476, 478, 479, 497, 498, Latin, 147, 151, 154, 171, 176, 530, 564, 568, 580, 622, 182, 300, 305, 443, 445, 625, 760, 810, 835,
    [Show full text]
  • ONIX for Books Codelists Issue 46
    ONIX for Books Codelists Issue 46 10 July 2019 DOI: 10.4400/akjh Go to latest Issue All ONIX standards and documentation – including this document – are copyright materials, made available free of charge for general use. A full license agreement (DOI: 10.4400/nwgj) that governs their use is available on the EDItEUR website. All ONIX users should note that this issue of the ONIX codelists does not include support for codelists used only with ONIX version 2.1. ONIX 2.1 remains fully usable, using Issue 36 of the codelists or earlier, and Issue 36 continues to be available via the archive section of the EDItEUR website (https://www.editeur.org/15/Archived-Previous-Releases). These codelists are also available within a multilingual online browser at https://ns.editeur.org/onix. Codelists are revised quarterly. Layout of codelists This document contains ONIX for Books codelists Issue 46, intended primarily for use with ONIX 3.0. The codelists are arranged in a single table for reference and printing. They may also be used as controlled vocabularies, independent of ONIX. This document does not differentiate explicitly between codelists for ONIX 3.0 and those that are used with earlier releases, but lists used only with earlier releases have been removed. For details of which code list to use with which data element in each version of ONIX, please consult the main Specification for the appropriate release. Occasionally, a handful of codes within a particular list are defined as either deprecated, or not valid for use in a particular version of ONIX or with a particular data element.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spread of the World's Major Writing Systems to 1492
    Copyrighted Material 75° the1492 spread of the world’s major writing systems to 1492 Runic inscription Arctic Circle from Sweden, early The adoption of writing marks the end of a society’s 11th century ad. prehistory. Writing has been invented independently many times during world history and is a natural expression of the human capacity for abstract and symbolic thought. Roman inscription from the emperor Trajan’s reign in the Latin alphabet. Writing was a response to growing social and economic complexity and as such it is often considered one of the Ogam defining characteristics of civilization. Runic The earliest known writing system was the Sumerian Mongol pictographic script which developed c. 3400 bc. In the 45° 3rd millennium the pictographs were gradually refined Etruscan Chinese pictographic and simplified, developing into the cuneiform script. Latin Cyrillic alphabet Luvian Proto-Canaanite alphabet Chinese logographic The Sumerian scripts were adopted widely. Sumerian Phoenician-Canaanite alphabet hieroglyphic Korean Mycenaean Linear B Japanese pictographic was adopted by the Elamites and perhaps Sumerian pictographic alphabet Greek alphabet Aramaic script inspired the Indus valley pictographic script. Cuneiform Minoan hieroglyphic Cuneiform Indus was adopted by the Assyrians, Babylonians, Elamites Valley Tibetan Egyptian Elamite script Hittites and Persians among others. pictographic hieroglyphic Nabataean Despite its superficial similarity, the Egyptian Olmec Kufic Brahmic hieroglyphic script, which developed c. 3100 bc, was Epi-Olmec Tropic of Cancer Chinese cursive probably invented independently of Sumerian pictographic. Mixtec Egyptian hieroglyphic inscription script, used from from the 4th century bc. Its influence was limited to Nubia, Minoan Crete and the Zapotec Maya Sabaean Han dynasty times Hittite empire.
    [Show full text]